Professional Documents
Culture Documents
]
Where :
KR-21 : Kuder-Richardson Reliability Coefficient
K : Number of Items in the Test
M : Mean of Sets of the Test
SD : Standard Deviation of the Test Scores
To get standar deviation, the formula is as follows :
Mean :
N = Number of items test
X = The Scores of items test
Dealing with it, Fraenkel and Wallen in (Erlangga, 2010:19) states that for
research purposes, a useful rule is that the reliability coefficient should be at least
0.70 and preferably higher.
21
8.6 Technique for Analyzing the Data
To find out the correlation between students competence in vocabulary mastery
and reading comprehension, the writer uses the correlation formula by Pearson
Product Moment Correlation to test significant correlation between them.
According to Biegier and Gerlach (1996:4), the formula used as follows :
} ) ( }{ ) ( {
) )( (
2 2 2 2
Y Y n X X n
Y X XY n
r
xy
Mean :
N = the Number of Student Respondents
X = the Students Score in Vocabulary
Y = the Students Score in Reading Comprehension
X = the Sum of Vocabulary Score
Y = the Sum of Reading Comprehension Score
X
2
= the Sum of Square of Vocabulary Scores
Y
2
= the Sum of Square of Reading Comprehension Scores
(X)
2
= the Square of the Sum of Vocabulary Scores
(Y)
2
= the Square of the Sum of Reading Comprehension Scores
XY
= the Sum Multiplication of Vocabulary Scores and Reading
Comprehension Scores.
Correlation Pearson Product Moment denoted (r). According to Biegier and
Gerlach (1996:4), the coefficient of correlation is a number that varies between -1.0
and +1.0 and that indicates the strength of the relationship between two variables. A
correlation coefficient of +1.0 indicates that there is a perfect positive relationship
22
between the two variables. A correlation -1.0 indicates a perfect negative relationship
between two variables. While the price of the meaning of r will be consulted with the
interpretation table r as follows :
TABLE 4
TABLE r PERSON PRODUCT MOMENT
Interval Coefficient Interpretation
0,80 1,000
0,60 0,799
0,40 0.599
0,20 0,399
0,00 0,199
Very High
High
Moderate
Low
Very Low
23
REFERENCES
Bieger, George R. and Gail J. Gerlach. 1996. Educational Research: A Practical
Approach. New York: Delmar Publishers.
Daiek, Deborah and Nancy Anter. 2004. Critical Reading for College and Beyond.
New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
Djiwandono, P. Istiarto. 2001. Strategi Membaca Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta:Gramedia
Pustaka Utama.
Erlangga, Gusti. 2010. Teaching English Vocabulary by Using Pictures in the Theme
Parts of Body to the Sixth Grade Pupils of SD Negeri 3 Pagaralam. Thesis.
Palembang: University of PGRI Palembang.
Fraenkel, Jack R, et all. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.
New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
Graves, Michael F. 2004. Essential Reading On Vocabulary Instruction. Alexandria:
ASCD.
Grellet, F. 1999. Developing Reading Skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Hackman, Sue. 2008. Teaching Effective Vocabulary. Departement for Children,
Schools and Families.
Heaton, J.B. 1988. Writing English Language Tests. New York: Longman Inc.
Herrel, Andrienne L. and Michael Jordan.2006. 50 Strategies For Improving
Vocabulary, Comprehension and Fluency : An Active Learning Approach. New
Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Hiebert, Elfrieda H. and Michael L. Kamil. 2005. Teaching And Learning
Vocabulary : Bringing Research To Practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Inc.
24
Howards, Melvin. 1980. Reading Diagnosis and Instruction : An Integrated
Approach. Virginia: Prentice-Hall Company.
Jackson, Howards and Etienne Ze Amvela. 2004. Words, Meaning And Vocabulary :
An Introduction To Modern English Lexicology. New York: Cromwell Press.
Richards, Jack C and Ricahrd Schmidt. 2002. Longman Dictionary of Language
Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Fakenham, Norfolk: Fakenham Photosetting
Ltd.
Walch, J. Wetson. 1998. Speed Reading For Better Grades. Portland, Maine,: J.
Wetson Walch Publisher.
Weaver, Constance. 2002. Reading Process And Practice. Portsmouth: Reed Elsevier
Inc.