Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1) Make certain all Comm constraints are turned off.
2) Refresh the Link Budget report. Entries for Flux Density should range between
approximately 122 and 100 dB(watts/m
2
).
Now suppose you wish to exclude from consideration links with a Flux Density less
than 110 dB(watts/m
2
).
3) Enter this value as the Min for Flux Density for the Transmitter Properties.
4) Click Apply. Observe the effects in the 2D visualization window and in the
(refreshed) Link Budget report.
CommConstraints 9
Like RIP (above), Flux Density is not susceptible to improvement through
adjustment of receiver properties but can be increased by changing transmitter
parameters. Try, for example, increasing the transmitter's power or removing the 1
dB pointing loss in the Post Transmit Gains & Losses window.
NOTE: Turn off the constraint, and restore the transmitter to its original settings
before proceeding to the next section.
Carrier to Noise Ratio Constraints
One of the most commonly used criteria for assessing link performance is Carrier to
Noise Ratio (CNR). This can be expressed independently of bandwidth as:
eq
r a p
T k
g L L EIRP
N C
) (
/
0
where L
p
= free space loss, L
a
= atmospheric losses, g
r
= receiver gain, k =
Boltzmann's constant = 1.3806 x 10
-23
W/KHz, and T
eq
= equivalent noise
temperature. To factor in bandwidth, multiply the denominator by the reference
bandwidth (B
RF
):
RF eq
r a p
B T k
g L L EIRP
N C
) (
/
For the communications link in this exercise, C/N
0
and C/N fall in the approximate
ranges 65 to 92 dB/Hz and -10 to 18 dB, respectively. You can constrain link
performance with respect to either of these criteria.
1) Bring the receiver properties up.
2) Impose a 10 dB Min C/N constraint.
3) Observe the effect in the 2D visualization window and (refreshed) Link Budget
report.
10 CommConstraints
In contrast to other link criteria we have considered, C/N
0
and C/N can be improved
via receiver as well as transmitter adjustments, since receiver gain appears in the
numerator of both equations. Leave the C/N constraint in place, and from the
receivers Basic/Definition page, try each of the following adjustments one at a time
resetting each parameter to its original value before proceeding to the next. Note
the changes in the access graphics in the 2D visualization window:
Increase Gain to 25 dB
Reduce Receiver Noise Figure to 1 dB
Add (Right Hand or Left Hand) Circular Polarization
In the Additional Gains and Losses frame, add a Pre-Receive gain of 1 dB (give it any name
you like)
For the Rain Model, increase the Outage Percent to 0.03
Reset the Rain Model value to 0.01, but leave the C/N constraint in place.
An interesting transmitter adjustment to try out is a change in the Modulation Type.
1) Open transmitters properties.
2) Select the Basic Definition page.
3) Select the Modulator tab.
4) Change the Modulation Type to MSK.
NOTE: The default modulator was BPSK. Restore the original transmitter settings,
and remove the C/N constraint before proceeding.
Constraints on Digital Systems
For digital communications systems, the receiver bit energy to noise ratio is defined
as:
T N C N E
b
) / ( /
0 0
CommConstraints 11
where T = the bit period. As reflected in the Link Budget report (refreshed after
removing any constraints), the communications link in this exercise exhibits E
b
/N
0
values ranging from approximately -6 to 20.
1) Open transmitters properties.
2) Select the Basic Definition page.
3) In the Modulator tab, set the Data Rate to 12 Mbps.
4) Select the Constraints Comm page.
5) Set the Min E
b
/N
0
to 15 dB.
As with CNR, link performance can be improved by tweaking receiver or transmitter
parameters. This increases the bit period T, which leads directly to an improvement
in E
b
/N
0
.
NOTE: Remove the E
b
/N
0
constraint, and restore the Data Rate to its default value
before you proceed.
A direct measure of link performance for a digital system is Bit Error Rate (BER),
which expresses the probability that a bit will be received in error. According to the
Link Budget report (again refreshed, etc.), BER values in this exercise range from
approximately 1 x 10
-25
to 2.5 x 10
-1
. A typical desired BER is 10
-6
. Enter that value as
a Max BER constraint and note the results. BER is a function of E
b
/N
0
, and you can
improve it through adjustments in the receiver or transmitter, including reductions
in Data Rate.
NOTE: Remove the BER constraint before you proceed.
Refracted Elevation and Range Constraints
Constraints can be set in terms of the refracted elevation and range of the transmitter
with respect to the receiver.
1) Open the Refraction page of the receiver's Basic properties.
2) Turn on Use Refraction in Access Computations.
3) Open the Constraints Basic page.
4) Enter a Min value of 5 deg in the Elevation Angle frame:
This excludes links with satellites deemed to be too close to the horizon, which can be
unreliable due to the relatively long path through the atmosphere to be traversed by
the signal. Click Apply, and note the effect in the 2D visualization window. As you
will see, portions of the ground track of the satellite where it is just coming into or
disappearing from view are clipped off.
The calculation of the refracted elevation or range depends on the selected refraction
model. As you may recall, you selected an ITU model satisfying empirical criteria.
5) Open the Refraction page of the receiver's Basic properties.
12 CommConstraints
6) Select the Effective Radius Method model, which computes the apparent
elevation due to refraction.
7) Ensure the Effective Radius Factor is set to 1.33.
8) Click Apply.
Using this model, the 2D visualization window should reflect a marginally larger
portion of the satellite's orbit satisfying the elevation constraint than under the more
empirically grounded ITU model.
Note: When Use Refraction in Access Computations is checked,
object visibility, range, elevation angle, and link angle of the antenna
boresight are computed with refraction taken into account.
Refraction is applied to access computations for any receivers that have the Use
Refraction in Access Computations option checked.
Remember to switch back to the ITU model and turn off the Refracted Elevation
constraint before proceeding.
An Everyday Use of C/N Constraints
It is a common practice for a receiver vendor to stipulate a minimum required C/N
value that must be satisfied in order for its equipment to perform to specification.
Imposing a C/N constraint on accesses between a receiver and a transmitter is an
easy way to model this requirement in the design of communications links. For
example, if the manufacturer specifies that its equipment requires a C/N value of at
least 5 dB to function properly, you can simply enter a Min value of 5 for the C/N
constraint, which will reduce the number and/or length of calculated periods of
access between the receiver and transmitter.
For greater confidence in the quality and reliability of a link, it is a good idea to add a
fade margin to other requirements that must be met. A natural way to do this is to
increase the Min value of the C/N constraint to include that margin. Thus, to model a
fade margin of 3 dB for a receiver requiring a minimum C/N value of 5 dB, just set
the Min value for C/N to 8 dB. You can then enjoy a higher degree of confidence in
the access periods displayed in the 2D visualization window or listed in the Link
Budget report.
1
STK / SEET MAGNETIC FIELD TUTORIAL
Contents
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1
PROBLEM STATEMENT............................................................................................. 1
GETTING STARTED ................................................................................................. 2
SOLUTION APPROACH............................................................................................. 2
Create the Scenario...................................................................................... 2
Configure the Magnetic Field Model ................................................................. 3
Configure the Display 3D Vector ..................................................................... 3
Create a report giving the magnetic vector components...................................... 5
Configure and perform magnetic conjugacy study.............................................. 6
RESULTS AND ANALYSES......................................................................................... 8
Licenses Needed
This tutorial requires that you be licensed for the STK Space Environmental Effects Tool (SEET).
Introduction
The Magnetic Field component computes the full vector magnetic field along the satellite
path, as well as performing field-line tracing, using standard models. Typically, the Inter-
national Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) is used to model the Earth main (core)
field contribution. The IGRF is a multi-pole spherical harmonic approximation fit to
measurements of the magnetic field produced by currents flowing beneath the Earth's sur-
face. In addition, an external field model is provided to estimate the contribution of the
solar-wind magnetic field to the near-Earth environment. Many spacecraft fly directional
magnetometers to measure their local vector magnetic field (denoted as B by convention)
which can, in combination with a suitable field model, be used for navigation or attitude
control.
Another aspect of magnetic fields is the concept of lines of force or magnetic field-
lines (such as the patterns produced in iron filings by a bar magnetic). The field-lines play
an important role in understanding the physics of the near-Earth space environment be-
cause high-energy charged particles that populate near-Earth space spiral along these
field-lines. In this context, scientists are often interested in knowing when two points
such as a ground magnetometer station and a satellite are connected by the same field
line, a condition known as magnetic conjugacy.
Problem Statement
For a given space-vehicle configuration and orbit, and for a specified ground station, de-
termine the local magnetic vector location along the orbit and the times when the space-
craft location is magnetically conjugate to the ground station.
2
Getting Started
The primary decisions to make before developing a Magnetic Field model scenario using
STK involve balancing model accuracy versus computational speed:
Decide which field model(s) to use. The IGRF main-field with the Olson-Pfitzer
external field gives the highest accuracy. Fast-IGRF is reasonably accurate alter-
native to the IGRF (within 1%) which offers some improvement in speed. The
centered-dipole model is a good choice when computational speed is a high prior-
ity. Analyses under about 15000 km altitude generally do not require the external
field model.
Choose the IGRF update rate. The harmonic coefficients of the IGRF main-field
change slowly with time and are maintained in tables having nodal values added
every five years typically. Between these nodes, the coefficients are linearly in-
terpolated. The update rate determines how frequently the IGRF model coeffi-
cients are re-interpolated from the table. The default of one (1) day should be fine
for most circumstances, but increasing this value to up to 30 days for very long
orbits can improve computational speed.
Solution Approach
Build a scenario that will cover the desired time period for the satellite orbit of interest.
Add a ground station of interest. Set the relevant model parameters to achieve the desired
balance between accuracy and computational speed. Configure STK properties as needed
to obtain the desired display.
Create the Scenario
1. Create a new scenario by using the New Scenario Wizard, by selecting New
from the File menu, or by clicking the corresponding toolbar button . Fill in the
scenario name and description as desired. For the analysis period, enter 14 Oct
2009 16:00:00.000 UTCG to 15 Oct 2009 16:00:00.000 UTCG. Hit OK.
2. Next, add a satellite to the scenario that will exercise the Magnetic Field model in
the desired manner. This tutorial will use an existing DMSP satellite. This satellite
transits a sun synchronous orbit at around 850km altitude.
If the Insert New Object Tool dialog box is not already visible, select New
from the Insert menu. In the Insert STK Objects dialog box, select Satellite un-
der Scenario Object and Select from Satellite Database under Select a Method
and hit Insert. In the SSC Number edit box, enter 29524 and hit the Search button.
A single satellite named DMSP 5D-3 F17 D should appear in the list. Select it
and hit Insert. Close the Insert from Satellite Database dialog box.
3. Close the Insert STK Objects panel. Save the scenario.
3
Configure the Magnetic Field Model
4. Display satellite properties for modification by right-clicking on the satellite ob-
ject in the Object Browser panel and select Properties. In the properties panel
tree, under Basic, select SEET Environment. The upper dialog box contains the
magnetic field parameters. Since we are in a LEO orbit and will be considering a
relatively short time period, we will use the default selections: IGRF main-field,
no external field, and 1 day IGRF update rate.
Configure the Display 3D Vector
5. Within the satellite properties under 3D Graphics, select Vector. In the vector list,
select the Show checkbox for Nadir(Centric) Vector. De-selecting the Show La-
bel option.
6. In the vector list, select the Show checkbox for Velocity Vector. De-select the
Show Label option.
7. Click the Add button to bring up the Add Vector Geometry Components dia-
log. Under the satellite object, select the SEET_GeomagneticField vector and add
it to the selected Name list. Hit OK.
8. Back in the 3D Graphics Vector panel, select the Show checkbox for the
SEET_GeomagneticField. Change the color and de-select Show Label option.
Select Show Magnitude if desired. Click the Apply button to apply changes.
4
9. To view the vectors selected in the previous step, display the 3D viewing window
(select the 3D Graphics tab). If the 3D Graphics Toolbar is not visible, select View
-> Toolbars -> 3D Graphics in the main menu. On this toolbar, click on the
View To/From button and select the DMSP satellite for both the View From
and View To menu boxes.
5
10. To observe the behavior of the geomagnetic field vector over time, select the Play
button from the Animation toolbar. Press the Reset button when finished.
Save the scenario.
Create a report giving the magnetic vector components
11. In the Object Browser, right-click on the DMSP satellite and select Report &
Graph Manager.
12. In the Report and Graph Manager dialog box, right-click on My Styles. Select
New and then Report. Enter a name for the report (e.g., Magfield Vector) and hit
Enter.
13. In the Report Style dialog box, scroll through the Data Providers list to the SEET
Magnetic Field set and expand the set by clicking the plus symbol . Move
Time, B Field ECF x, B Field ECF y, and B Field ECF z to the Re-
port Contents list by highlighting them and clicking the arrow button . Hit OK
to close the panel.
6
14. Returning to the Report and Graph Manager dialog, select Generate. A report
window will be displayed containing the data selected for the report.
Configure and perform magnetic conjugacy study
15. Insert a ground facility (here Boston). From the main menu, select Insert -> Fa-
cility From City Database. Type in Boston in the City Name box and click
Search. Highlight Boston, Massachusetts, Insert and Close.
16. In the Object Browser, right click on the Boston icon and select Properties. Un-
der Constraints, select Basic and de-select the option labeled Line-of-sight,
then click Apply.
17. Go to the DMSP satellite properties page. Under Constraints, select Basic and
de-select the option labeled Line-of-sight, and then click Apply.
18. Staying on the DMSP satellite properties page, under 2D Graphics, select
SEET Environment. Within the Magnetic Field Line Contour pane, select
Show 3D and Show L-shell value label, and then click Apply.
19. Staying on the DMSP satellite properties page, under Constraints select
SEET. In the Magnetic Field Line Separation box, check the box by Min and
enter 0 deg; check the box by Max and enter 10 deg. Click OK.
7
20. In the Object Browser, right click on the DMSP satellite icon and select Access
Tool. Click on Boston in the Associated Objects box, then click Compute.
8
Results and Analyses
21. Produce an Access Report between the spacecraft and the facility by bringing up
the Report and Graph Manager page. For the Object Type, choose Access. Un-
der Installed Styles, double-click on Access Intervals by Constraint.
22. Produce a Geomagnetic Conjugacy Report by returning to the Report and Graph
Manager page. For the Object Type, change to Satellite. Under Installed
Styles, double-click on SEET Geomagnetic Conjugacy. When the Available
Objects options box appears, make sure that Boston is highlighted and click OK.
23. Return to the 3D Graphics window and select the Play button from the Anima-
tion toolbar. Press the Reset button when finished. Save the scenario.
24. Choose a time from the Geomagnetic Conjugacy Report when the Separation an-
gle is near minimum, e.g. 14 Oct 2009 21:36:55.000. Paste this value from the re-
port and into the epoch display for the 3D Graphics window. Something similar to
the following screenshot should appear.
STK / SEET PARTICLE IMPACTS TUTORIAL
Contents
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1
PROBLEM STATEMENT .......................................................................................................... 1
GETTING STARTED............................................................................................................... 1
SOLUTION APPROACH .......................................................................................................... 2
Create the Scenario................................................................................................... 2
Set Particle Environment and Satellite Surface Properties................................................. 2
Generate a report detailing the damaging impacts on the satellite ..................................... 3
Generate the associated graph .................................................................................... 4
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS....................................................................................................... 6
Licenses Needed
This tutorial requires that you be licensed for the STK Space Environmental Effects Tool (SEET).
Introduction
The SEET Particle Impacts component computes the probabilistic distributions and rates of im-
pact of small meteoroid and orbital debris particles upon a spacecraft of given cross-section and
orbit, as a function of time or particle mass. It can also determine the portion of these particles
that cause damage, for specified surface properties and damage threshold.
Problem Statement
For a given vehicle configuration and orbit, determine the degree of exposure to potentially dam-
aging debris and meteoroid impacts over the course of its mission lifetime.
Getting Started
The following information should be determined before developing a Particle Impacts scenario
using STK:
Satellite orbital path to be studied. Note that the Debris module calculations are based
on average satellite altitude, and only apply for spacecraft for which the average altitude
is between 300 and 2250km.
The time period of study.
The cross-sectional area of the satellite surface.
If damaging impact information is desired, the material of the satellite surface, and the
impact depth threshold for functional/operational damage.
Determine the types of particle impact results to be generated:
- Impacts from meteoroid particles?
- Impacts from orbital debris particles?
- All particle impacts or only impacts that cause a certainly level of damage to the sat-
ellite surface?
- Impact rates as a function of time (meteoroid particles only)?
- Total number of impacts during the study period?
- Mass distribution of the impacts during the study period?
Solution Approach
Build a scenario that will cover the desired time period for the satellite orbit of interest. Specify
the environmental and satellite surface properties. Generate a report and graph containing the
desired impact information.
Create the Scenario
1. To create a new scenario, select New from the File menu or use the corresponding
toolbar button . Fill in the scenario name and description for the scenario as desired.
Set the analysis period from 22 Dec 2009 16:00:00.000 UTCG to 25 Dec 2009
16:00:00.000 UTCG. Hit OK.
2. Add the desired satellite to the scenario. This tutorial will use the existing GRACE-1 sat-
ellite. If the Insert New Object Tool dialog box is not already visible, select New
from the Insert menu. In the Insert STK Objects dialog box, select Satellite under Sce-
nario Object and Select from Satellite Database under Select a Method. Hit Insert. In
the Satellite Database dialog, either scroll down the list until GRACE-1 is shown, or en-
ter the name in the search on common name. Select the satellite and hit Insert, then
Close.
3. Close the Insert STK Objects panel. Save the scenario.
Set Particle Environment and Satellite Surface Properties
4. Display satellite properties for modification by right-clicking on the satellite in the Object
Browser panel and select Properties. In the properties panel tree, under Basic, select
SEET Particle Flux. Those properties related to the calculation of impact information
will be displayed in the Basic SEET Particle Flux panel. The following settings are avail-
able:
Debris impact calculations require the F
10.7
solar flux average from the 13 months
prior to the time period of study. A static F
10.7
value may be specified, or the value
may be calculated automatically from the solar flux data source file.
Specify the satellite cross-sectional area for potential impacts.
If damaging impact results are desired, select the surface material and specify the as-
sociated pit depth threshold. Custom material property values may be specified when
the User Defined material is selected.
Optionally, the contribution of Sporadic Meteors (cosmic dust) to the impact calcula-
tions may be excluded.
5. For GRACE-1, set the Cross-Sectional Area to 2.5 m^2, the Pit Depth to 0.002 m, and the
material to Mylar. Hit OK or Apply.
Generate a report detailing the damaging impacts on the satellite
6. In the Object Browser, right-click on the GRACE-1 satellite. Select Report and Graph
Manager.
7. In the Report and Graph Manager dialog box, right-click on My Styles. Select New and
then choose Report. Enter a name for the report and hit Enter.
8. In the Report Style dialog box, scroll through the Data Providers list to the SEET Parti-
cle Flux Model set and expand the set by clicking the plus symbol . Highlight Defini-
tion from the expanded list and hit the arrow button to move it to the Report Con-
tents list Next, open the SEET Meteor Flux data provider and Damaging Impacts
folder. Concurrently highlight (using the Ctrl key) Time, Impact flux and Impact
rate, and hit the arrow button again. A new section containing these parameters will
be added in the Report Contents list. Hit OK or Apply.
9. In the Report and Graph Manager dialog, select Generate (A pause may be experi-
enced while STK/SEET computes the values to be reported.) A report window will be
displayed containing the data selected for the report.
Generate the associated graph
10. In the Report and Graph Manager dialog box, right-click on My Styles. Select New and
then Graph. Enter a name for the report and hit Enter.
11. In the Graph Style dialog box, scroll through the Data Providers list to the SEET Meteor
Flux data provider and expend the Damaging Impacts folder. Highlight Impact rate
and hit the arrow button associated with the Y-Axis pane. Hit OK or Apply.
12. Returning to the Report and Graph Manager dialog, select Generate (A pause may be
experienced while STK/SEET computes the values to be graphed.) A graph window will
be displayed containing the data selected.
13. To view the details of the graph, double-click the graph and choose the Axis tab. Set the
Min Y axis value to zero, and the Max Y-axis value to 5e-008. Hit OK.
Results and Analysis
Note the short up-and-down variation of the damaging meteoroid flux of each orbit. This is due
to the satellite passing behind the Earth relative to the respective travel directions of the various
meteor showers active during this time period. The overall plot trend, peaking late on 22 Dec, is
due to the variation of the Ursids meteor shower activity. The Ursids annual shower is a brief,
but intense meteor shower. This trend will vary throughout the year, as it depends on the specific
periods of activity of the many showers contained in the meteoroid environment database.
1
STK / SEET RADIATION ENVIRONMENT TUTORIAL
Contents
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1
PROBLEM STATEMENT............................................................................................. 2
GETTING STARTED ................................................................................................. 2
SOLUTION APPROACH............................................................................................. 2
Create the Scenario...................................................................................... 3
Configure the Magnetic Field model for use with the Radiation Environment ........... 3
Configure the Radiation Environment for a long time base dose-depth analysis....... 4
Configure the Radiation Environment for a high resolution dose-depth analysis....... 5
Configure the Radiation Environment for a min/max flux comparison.................... 6
Licenses Needed
This tutorial requires that you be licensed for the STK Space Environmental Effects Tool (SEET).
Introduction
The Radiation Environment component provides a suite of models for computing ener-
getic particle fluxes and fluences in near-Earth space, as well as ionizing dose rates and
integrated doses behind user-specified shielding thicknesses (dose-depth curves). The
flux models provided include the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) CRRES models
as well as the standard NASA AE8 and AP8 models for both protons and electrons. For
dose quantities, the data based APEXRAD and CRRESRAD models are provided, which
give total dose only for a limited set of shielding thicknesses, as well as the standard
SHIELDOSE2 model, which is highly configurable in terms of, for example, shielding
thickness and detector type, and can provide the dosing due to protons, electrons and
brems-strahlung separately, but is computationally much slower than the data based mod-
els.
The models for this component are essentially climatological databases obtained by
binning satellite data in a magnetic coordinate space (specifically, L
M
and B/B
eq
); there-
fore, a particular magnetic field model must be specified in order to access the data. Here,
L
M
is the McIlwain L parameter, a mathematical way of indicating an energetic particle's
drift shell, and B/B
eq
is the ratio of the local magnetic field to the minimum magnetic
field along the field-line passing through the local point in space. L
M
and B/B
eq
are com-
puted internally from the user-specified magnetic field model.
*
*
For more background information, see the STK / SEET Magnetic Field Tutorial and the SEET manual
located in the <STK install folder>\Help\STK\pdf.
2
Problem Statement
For a given space vehicle configuration and orbit, determine:
a low resolution dose-depth curve for a long time base-line orbit (several weeks),
a high resolution dose-depth curve for a short time base-line orbit (several revolu-
tions), and
a min/max flux comparison on an intermediate time base-line orbit (fraction of a
day).
Getting Started
The primary decisions to make when developing a Radiation Environment scenario using
STK involve determining which models to use and balancing accuracy or resolution of
results versus computational speed.
Decide which field model(s) to use. The IGRF main-field with the Olson-Pfitzer
external field gives the highest accuracy. Fast-IGRF is reasonably accurate alter-
native to the IGRF (within 1%) which offers some improvement in speed. The
centered-dipole model is a good choice when computational speed is a high prior-
ity. Analyses under about 15000 km altitude generally do not require the external
field model.
Choose the IGRF update rate. The harmonic coefficients of the IGRF main-field
change slowly with time and are maintained in tables having nodal values added
every five years typically. Between these nodes, the coefficients are linearly in-
terpolated. The update rate determines how frequently the IGRF model coeffi-
cients are re-interpolated from the table. The default of one (1) day should be fine
for most circumstances, but increasing this value to up to 30 days for very long
orbits can improve computational speed.
Decide which Radiation Environment models to use. For scenarios longer than a
day for which dose information is computed, the APEXRAD, CRRESRAD, or
Radiation-only option should be selected; these are fast models based on data.
However, for access to the full range of SHIELDOSE2 options (selectable depths,
different detector types, species-resolved doses, greater spatial range of validity),
the CRRES or NASA models will need to be selected. The NASA models cover
the broadest spatial and energy ranges, but the CRRES models are based on more
recent data (1990s).
Solution Approach
Build a scenario that will cover the desired time period for the satellite orbit of interest.
Add a ground station of interest. Set the relevant model parameters to achieve the desired
balance between accuracy and computational speed. Configure STK properties as needed
to obtain the desired display.
3
Create the Scenario
1. Create a new scenario by using the New Scenario Wizard, by selecting New
from the File menu, or by clicking the corresponding toolbar button . Fill in the
scenario name and description as desired. For the analysis period, enter 1 Oct
2009 00:00:00.000 UTCG to15 Oct 2009 00:00:00.000 UTCG. Hit OK.
2. Add a satellite to the scenario that will exercise the Radiation Environment mod-
els. Here we will use a nominal eccentric orbit that covers a large portion of the
inner belt and a smaller portion of the outer belt.
If the Insert New Object Tool dialog box is not already visible, select menu Insert
-> New. Under Scenario Objects, choose Satellite. Under Select a Method,
choose Orbit Wizard and hit the Insert button. In the Orbit Wizard window,
for Type, select Orbit Designer, then fill in the following values: semi-major
axis: 15000 km; eccentricity: 0.4; inclination: 30 deg; argument of perigee: 50
deg; right ascension of the ascending node (RAAN): 90 deg. Hit OK.
3. Close the Insert STK Objects dialog box. Save the scenario.
4. Right-click the scenario icon in the Object Browser and select Properties.
Under Basic, select Units then scroll down to RadiationShieldThickness and
select mm. Returning to Basic, select SEET Radiation. In the NASA Electron
and Proton Activity pane, change the dialog to Solar Max. Click OK.
Configure the Magnetic Field model for use with the Radiation Envi-
ronment
5. Right-click on the satellite object in the Object Browser and select Properties.
Under Basic, select SEET Environment. Within the Magnetic Field Model
pane, set the Main Field to Fast IGRF and the External Field to Olson-Pfitzer.
These settings may be recommended for use with the Radiation Environment.
Leave the IGRF update rate at 1 day. Click Apply.
4
Configure the Radiation Environment for a long time base dose-depth
analysis
6. Next we will configure the Radiation Environment for a long time baseline dose
depth analysis and generate a report. Since these reports can take very long to
compute, we will use the faster database models. On the satellites Properties
page, under Basic, select SEET Radiation. In the Model pane, confirm that
Computational Mode is Radiation Only, and Dose Channel is Total.
Leave other options at their default values, including the Shielding Thicknesses
listed at the right. Note that in Radiation Only, CRRESRAD and APEXRAD Com-
putational Modes, only the prescribed sets of shielding thicknesses may be used.
7. To compute and view the dose-depth report for this computational mode, bring up
the Report and Graph Manager by selecting Analysis -> Report & Graph Man-
ager from the main menu. Set Object Type to Satellite. In the Styles pane,
expand the Installed Styles folder and scroll down to the SEET Radiation Dose
Depth report style and double-click it to launch the report. Note that the report
could take several minutes to generate. It should look like the following:
5
8. The units of the shielding thickness can be changed by right-clicking on (Mils)
in the report to expose an option menu. Go to Shielding thickness -> Units to re-
veal the units panel. Uncheck Use Defaults and set the New Unit Value to Mil-
limeters (mm). Click OK:
Configure the Radiation Environment for a high resolution dose-
depth analysis
9. Now we will configure the Radiation Environment for a high resolution (i.e.,
many depths) dose depth analysis and generate the corresponding report. Since
these generally take very long to compute, we will use a short time baseline for
the report. On the satellites Properties page, under Basic, select SEET Radia-
tion. In the Model pane, for Computational Mode, select NASA, leave the
Detector Type as Silicon and set the Detector Geometry to Spherical.
10. On the same page as the above step, click the Remove All button in the Shielding
Thicknesses pane. Click Add and enter 1 mm in the text box that appears, then
hit the Return or Enter key. Repeat this for the following set of shielding thick-
nesses: 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm. Click Apply.
11. Return to the Report & Graph Manager configuration page. In the Time Proper-
ties pane, select Specify properties, then insert the following Stop time: 1 Oct
2009 04:00:00.000 UTCG.
12. Create a new report by clicking . Type in a new name for the report, such as
SEET Rad All Dose Depth. When you hit the return key, the reports content
panel appears.
13. Scroll down the Data Providers list on the left and expand the SEET Radiation
Dose Depth folder. Add Shielding Thickness, Electron Dose, Electron-
Brehsstrahlung Dose, Proton Dose and Combined Dose to the Report Contents
6
list (using the arrow button).
14. Highlight Shielding Thickness in the Report Contents pane and then click on the
Units button. Uncheck the Use Defaults checkbox and set the New Unit
Value to Millimeters (mm). Click OK. This maintains the reported values in
their native units.
15. Click OK in the Reports & Graphs window to save the new report style. A SEET
Radiation Dose Depth report icon should now be highlighted under the My
Styles folder within the Styles pane of the Reports & Graphs Manager window.
16. Click the Generate button to create the report. Note that this report may take
several minutes to generate.
Configure the Radiation Environment for a min/max flux comparison
17. Return to the Report & Graph Manager page. Set the stop time to 1 Oct 2009
12:00:00.000 UTCG. In the Installed Styles folder, double-click on SEET Radia-
tion Electron Flux to create the graph.
7
18. Return to Satellite Properties -> Basic -> SEET Radiation. Within the Model
pane, set the Computation Mode to CRRES and click Apply.
19. Return to the Report & Graph Manager window again and double-click SEET
Radiation Electron Flux under the Installed Styles folder. Note the difference in
the ranges of validity between the two graphs.
1
STK / SEET SOUTH ATLANTIC ANOMALY (SAA) TUTORIAL
Contents
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1
PROBLEM STATEMENT............................................................................................. 1
GETTING STARTED ................................................................................................. 1
SOLUTION APPROACH............................................................................................. 2
Create the Scenario...................................................................................... 2
View SAA flux contours at a selectable altitude.................................................. 2
Create a report detailing SAA-induced ionizing radiation exposure........................ 3
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... 4
Licenses Needed
This tutorial requires that you be licensed for the STK Space Environmental Effects Tool (SEET).
Introduction
Satellite designers and mission planners need to be able to quantify the amount of expo-
sure to high levels of ionizing radiation over the course of satellite missions. The data can
be used to minimize exposure and to design adequate shielding in order to prevent single
event upsets and failures of sensitive instrumentation. The SAA (South Atlantic Anom-
aly) feature of STK/SEET supports this need by computing entry and exit times and dura-
tion of exposure to selectable levels of ionizing radiation emanating from the South At-
lantic Anomaly.
Problem Statement
For a given vehicle configuration and orbit, determine the amount of exposure to high
levels of ionizing proton radiation over the course of its mission lifetime due to satellite
interaction with the SAA.
Getting Started
The following information should be decided before developing an SAA scenario using
STK:
Determine the orbital path to be studied. Note that altitudes covered by the SAA
database range from 400 - 1700 kilometers. Orbits outside this range will have
limited exposure to ionizing radiation originating from the South Atlantic Anom-
aly.
Determine the start date and duration of the mission.
2
Select one of four proton energy channels to be analyzed (23, 38, 66, or 94 MeV),
based on the nature and sensitivity of onboard instrumentation and anticipated du-
ration of exposure.
Solution Approach
Build a scenario that will cover the desired time period for the satellite orbit of interest.
Add SAA contour display and satellite entry/exit points to the user interface. Generate a
report containing all the entry and exit positions and times of the satellite to a configured
energy threshold within the SAA, as well as exposure durations.
Create the Scenario
1. Create a new scenario by using the New Scenario Wizard, by selecting New
from the File menu, or by clicking the corresponding toolbar button . Fill in the
scenario name and description for the scenario as desired. Set the analysis period
from 09 Oct 2009 16:00:00.000 UTCG to 10 Oct 2009 16:00:00.000 UTCG. Hit
OK and save the new scenario.
2. Add a satellite to the scenario that will traverse the South Atlantic Anomaly re-
gion in altitude, as well as latitude and longitude. If the Insert New Object Tool
dialog box is not already visible, select New from the Insert menu. In the In-
sert STK Objects dialog box, select Satellite under Scenario Object and Orbit
Wizard under Select a Method. Hit Insert. This will display the Orbit Wiz-
ard dialog box.
3. Give the satellite an appropriate name, like SAA_leo (for low earth orbit). Set
Type to Orbit Designer. Set the semi-major axis to 7000 km. Set the eccentric-
ity to 0.03. Set inclination to 75 degrees. Set right ascension of the ascending
node (RAAN) to 100 deg. Hit OK.
View SAA flux contours at a selectable altitude
4. To display SAA contour lines on the 2D View of the scenario, right-click on the
satellite object in the Object Browser panel and select Properties. Under Ba-
sic, select SEET Environment.
5. In the South Atlantic Anomaly panel select the proton energy channel of interest.
In this case, leave the setting on >23MeV. Change the Flux Level setting to
Tenth of Peak. Hit Apply.
6. Under 2D Graphics, select SEET Environment. In the South Atlantic Anomaly
Contour pane, select the Show 2D and Show 3D checkboxes. Also check that
the Show at Vehicle Altitude button is selected. Hit OK.
3
7. From the Animation toolbar, select the Play icon to run the scenario to see the
satellite crossings of the SAA. Notice that the SAA contour changes with the sat-
ellite altitude. Press the Reset button when finished.
Create a report detailing SAA-induced ionizing radiation exposure
8. In the Object Browser, right-click on the SAA_leo satellite and select Report and
Graph Manager.
9. In the Report and Graph Manager dialog box, right-click on My Styles and select
New and choose Report. Enter a name for the report and hit Enter.
10. In the Report Style dialog box, scroll through the Data Providers list to the set of
items beginning with SEET SAA Highlight all data providers under SEET SAA
Crossing Times and hit the arrow button to move them to the Report Contents list.
Hit OK.
4
11. In the Report and Graph Manager dialog, select Generate
Results and Analysis
A report window will be displayed containing the data selected for the report. Examine
the report to determine the amount of exposure to proton radiation over the time interval
of interest.
STK / SEET VEHICLE TEMPERATURE TUTORIAL
Contents
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1
PROBLEM STATEMENT............................................................................................. 1
GETTING STARTED ................................................................................................. 1
SOLUTION APPROACH............................................................................................. 2
Create the Scenario...................................................................................... 2
Set Temperature Related Properties ................................................................ 2
Create a report of the surface temperature of the satellite panel .......................... 4
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... 6
Licenses Needed
This tutorial requires that you be licensed for the STK Space Environmental Effects Tool (SEET).
Introduction
The Vehicle Temperature component estimates the mean temperature of a satellite due to
direct solar and reflected Earth radiation, using simple thermal balancing equations. The
nominal case is for a spherical satellite; optionally, this component can compute the tem-
perature on a planar surface of specified geometry and orientation.
Problem Statement
For a given space vehicle configuration and orbit, determine the variation of the mean
temperature of a satellite panel.
Getting Started
The following information should be determined before developing a Vehicle Tempera-
ture model scenario using STK:
Decide whether the vehicle shape is more closely represented by a sphere or by
flat surface panels.
Consider the size of the vehicle. For a spherical satellite this should be defined in
terms of surface area. For a flat panel representation, this would be the area and
orientation of the panel of interest.
Consider the surface material properties of the vehicle. The emissivity, absorptiv-
ity, and heat dissipation characteristics of the material(s) comprising the surface
of the satellite or panel will be required.
Consider the environmental parameters. Earth albedo should be set within the
supported range that most closely approximate the conditions expected to be en-
countered during the mission.
Solution Approach
Build a scenario that will cover the desired time period for the satellite orbit of interest.
Set the relevant satellite size, shape and material properties to achieve the desired level of
accuracy for temperature calculations. Fine tune relevant environmental properties as de-
sired for the scenario.
Create the Scenario
1. Create a new scenario by using the New Scenario Wizard, by selecting New
from the File menu, or by clicking the corresponding toolbar button . Fill in the
scenario name and description for the scenario as desired. Set the analysis period
from 12 Oct 2009 16:00:00.000 UTCG to 13 Oct 2009 16:00:00.000 UTCG. Hit
OK and save the new scenario.
2. Next, add a satellite to the scenario that will exercise the Vehicle Temperature
model in the desired manner. This tutorial will use an existing DMSP satellite.
This spacecraft occupies a sun-synchronous orbit at around 850km altitude.
If the Insert New Object Tool dialog box is not already visible, select New
from the Insert menu. In the Insert STK Objects dialog box, select Satellite un-
der Scenario Object and Select from Satellite Database under Select a Method
and hit Insert. In the Satellite Database dialog, select the Advanced Filter but-
ton. In the Search Criteria dialog box, deselect the Status Set to Active check-
box and hit OK. In the SSC Number edit box, enter 29524 and hit the Search but-
ton. A single satellite named DMSP 5D-3 F17 D should appear in the list. Se-
lect it and hit Insert, then hit Close.
3. Close the Insert STK Objects panel. Save the scenario.
Set Temperature Related Properties
4. Display satellite properties for modification by right-clicking on the satellite ob-
ject in the Object Browser panel and select Properties. In the properties panel
tree, under Basic, select SEET Thermal. Those properties related to the calcula-
tion of satellite temperature will be displayed in the Thermal Model panel.
5. For a DMSP satellite, change the Shape Model property to Plate. Set the Cross-
Sectional Area to 0.8 m
2
. Also, set the Normal Vector property, which identifies
the orientation of the plate, to Earth. For this tutorial, use the default value for al-
bedo, which is near the center of the usual range of this value (to tailor the sce-
nario to more extreme conditions, the Earth environmental properties can be
modified accordingly). Hit OK.
6. To watch the scenario run, by selecting the Play button from the Animation
toolbar. Press the Reset button when finished. Notice that the satellites orbital
plane appears to maintain itself over the Earths terminator, especially if viewed
from the pole. Save the scenario.
Create a report of the surface temperature of the satellite panel
7. In the Object Browser, right-click on the DMSP satellite and select Report and
Graph Manager.
8. In the Report and Graph Manager dialog box, right-click on My Styles folder. Se-
lect New and then Report. Enter a name for the report and hit Enter.
9. In the Report Style dialog box, scroll through the Data Providers list to the SEET
Vehicle Temperature Model set and expand the set by clicking the plus symbol
. Highlight Definition from the expanded list and hit the arrow button to
move it to the Report Contents list.
10. Next, click the New Section button. In the Data Provider listing, double-click the
SEET Vehicle Temperature set to add those contents to second section of the
report. Hit OK.
11. In the Report and Graph Manager dialog, select Generate. A report window
will be displayed containing the data selected for the report.
12. Notice from the report that the temperature varies slightly over time. To graph this
variation, return to the Report and Graph Manager dialog box, right-click on My
Styles folder. Select New and then Graph. Enter a name for the graph and hit En-
ter.
13. In the Graph Style dialog box, scroll through the Data Providers list to the SEET
Vehicle Temperature set and expand the set by clicking the plus symbol .
Highlight Temperature from the expanded list and hit the first arrow button
to move it to the Y-axis pane. Hit OK.
14. In the Report and Graph Manager dialog, select Generate. A graph will be
displayed containing the data selected for the report. Save the scenario.
Results and Analysis
From the report and graph, one concludes that the mean panel temperature fluctuates by
about eight degrees Celsius during the scenario considered. This rather constant tempera-
ture is not unexpected because the panel is not afforded an opportunity to escape solar
heating by entering the shadow of the Earth, based on the report which indicates 100%
percent solar intensity over many revolutions.