SUPREME COURT Judges Hiding Crime Information

S.O.
S e - Voice For Justice - e-news weekly

Spreading the light of humanity & freedom
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.09..Issue.36........06/09/2014

JUD!s or "rokers of Justice #
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-
justice

SUPREME COURT Judges Hiding Crime Information

APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005
( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will
be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They
will fght among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day
would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in
the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the
forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal ,
corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants & Judges. Some of the
below mentioned judges , police & public servants fall among the category of
churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.

Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing
unavailability. If at all information is not truly available , why didnt the CPIO
TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law ,
Justice , Respective High Courts , etc.

The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby ,
CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO &
RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up
judges & their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a
day , we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still
paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks
amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do their
constitutional duties properly.

GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES ,
POLICE & PUBLIC SERVANTS MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB
SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.

We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament &
state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO
HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE
INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS
ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL
STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN
APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW
IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM ,
UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL
CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY
CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS
AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-
blind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,

RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

Hereby , we do request CPIO , Central Vigilance Commission , Satarkata Bhawan ,
A Block , GPO complex , INA , New Delhi - 110023.
to answer the following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national security ,
National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the
judiciary & police. If requested information is not available in your ofce please
transfer the application to the respective department / ofce where information is readily
available. At the end , I want information regarding criminals in the garb of police &
judges.

1 . How many judges are booked for graft , sexual crimes , crimes against women ,
irregularities , amassing disproportionate wealth , failure of duty , getting illegal allotment
of sites & other crimes since independence till date , yearwise ?
2. what action taken casewise ?
3. are the action taken similar to commoners , common people committing same type of
crimes ?
4. did all the cases handled by tainted judges subjected to review , retrial by other
honest judges ?
5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for infuencing witnesses / evidences ,
for tutored / concocted evidences , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what
action ? if not why ?
6. how many police ofcials / law enforcing ofcials were prosecuted by court for
infuencing , intimidating witnesses through threats , 3rddegree torture , for concocted
evidences , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
7. how many police / law enforcement ofcials were prosecuted for lock-up deaths ,
fake encounters , illegal detention , 3rd degree torture , etc since independence till date ,
yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
8. in how many cases police / law enforcement ofcials were made to pay compensation
to innocent victims who were wrongly charged , detained & tortured , murdered by
police , since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
9. in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the judgement of
lower court. In how many such cases , lower court judge is made to pay compensation
to victims of their wrong judgement , since independence till date yearwise ? what
action ? if not why ?
10. how many judges have defaulted in fling their annual fnancial returns giving out
their wealth , income details , yearwise since independence till date ? what action ? if
not why ?
11. how you are verifying the annual fnancial returns of judges ?
12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to death by
hanging , yearwise ?
13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ?
14. how many police ofcials were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for
defamation , when innocents falsely charged by police were acquitted , dropped from
charges by courts ? if not why ?
15. how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for
defamation , when innocents wrongly convicted by lower court , but on appeal higher
courts acquitting , dropping them of charges ? if not why ?
16. are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses on liquor /
alcohol , body massages , etc in their TA DA bill while on tour , ofcial visits , ofcial
parties hosted by judges ?
17. how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation of human &
fundamental rights , threat to lives / livelihood , etc were made to supreme court of india
, by nagaraja mysore raghupathi alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till date ?
appeals were made through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web through
DARPG , DPG. What ACTION taken by supreme court of india with respect to each
appeal ?
18. due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices were meted out
to public & public are still sufering injustices. Crimes which could have been prevented
by SC happened eventhough brought to early notice of supreme court. What action
against erring SC Judges ? if not why ?
19. I have repeatedly ofered my services to supreme court of india , to apprehend
criminals within judiciary , police & public service. What action taken by supreme court
of india ? if not why ?
20. in my legal struggle for justice , due to negligence / connivance of SCI judges I
have sufered murder attempts on my life , job losses , my newspaper closed , not
getting press accreditation to my web news papers , threats by rowdies , police , etc.
what action against erring chief justice of india ? if not why ?
22. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear as amicus
curie before supreme court of india & jain commission of enquiry regarding late PM
Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. I was not permitted why ?
23. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? what action
taken ? if not why ?
24. Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law interpretation is not same
for common people , Judges & Police ? why ?

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO
YEAR 1990-2014 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.

1. A .PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS
REQUIRED :
CPIO , Central Vigilance Commission , Satarkata Bhawan , A Block , GPO
complex , INA , New Delhi - 110023.

1.B. FEES PAID : IPO 22F 282811 for rupees ten only

2.A. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :
CPIO , Ministry of Home Afairs, Government of India , North Block, New Delhi -
110001


3.A. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :
CPIO , Ministry of Law and Justice, GOI , 4th Floor, A-Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New
Delhi-110 001.


DATE : 26.08.2014 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

RBI GOVERNOR Hiding Crime Information




below mentioned public servants fall among the category of churchills men
Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY ,
I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO
THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE
UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.

DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION
REQUIRED from CPIO , C/o PCGM and Secretary , Secretarys Department , Reserve
Bank of India , 16 th foor, Central Ofce Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg ,
Mumbai 400 001 :
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS - WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )
ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.
WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991 AT 21
ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEET NO staf no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985
Amended charge sheet staf no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985
1. Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid of 1979 ?
2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection division working properly ?
3. why there is no security check up of ofcers during entry & exit
out of premises ?
4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of
value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value of notes issued for sorting ?
5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the employees of those sections ?
6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective
documents relating to such high profle crime ?
7. why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited till 1983 ?
8. Why RBI has left out , so many ofcers ( who worked in the same
sections for more period than accused ofcers ) from domestic
enquiry ?
9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before
the court ?
10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested
interests ?
11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead of
independent investigation ?
12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of
evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?
13. in normal times , what is the period specifed in RBI regulations
for preserving old documents / records ?
14. after noticing such a high profle crime the RBI must have taken
utmost care to preserve such old records for indefnite time , for
producing before courts of law as & when demanded. But it didn't ,
why ?
15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,
with the criminals ?
16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead
of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of
defense ?
17. RBI authorities have stated that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one
another. However RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour
the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?
18. The alleged crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?
19. didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,
manipulate evidences ?
20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?
21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
ofcers - S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,
if not why ?
22. is it not due to inefciency , negligence of duty by such high
ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?
23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefcient ,
negligent higher ofcials ?
24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the
line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative
of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become
illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?
25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why RBI has denied his
pension ?
26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't
reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?
27. even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is
proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?
28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000
to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing left over to recover , still RBI completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram , why ?
29. ideally, domestic enquiry fndings / disciplinary actions should
be completed frst , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.
To cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond court orders date & gave fndings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the enquiry ofcer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?
30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court
against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But
it was not done , why ?
31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period ?
32. the undue delay in fling charge sheet , consequent destruction of
key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in
giving fndings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board's sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher
management. What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?
33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?
34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate
mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge
sheet ?
35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual
happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards fxed innocents from actual criminals ?
36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of
bundled verifed defective note packets ?
37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted
ofcers illegal ?
38. how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went
missing ?
39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?
40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head /
expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed
from packets made into new bundles , right ?
41. as per his statement , entire certifcates , seals of some asst
treasurers are there , who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?
42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals ,
putting some innocents seals over the notes ?
43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verifcation
section ?
44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?
45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?
46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore ofce was not done between 1975 &
1979 ?
47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing
internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court
proceedings ?
48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are
smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has
clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he
himself is not 100% sure ?
49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this ,
on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?
50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud.
However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no
action has been taken ?
51. why you didn't produce all records of all persons , who have
specifcally worked in alleged sections , the registers of those
departments with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet
nos , bag nos , etc ?
52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of
innocent ofcers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?
53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not
there to prove the presence of charge sheeted ofcers in the alleged
sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what
date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn't it ?
54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up
ofcers they dislike & falsely implicating them ?
55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from
original criminals ?
56. why no action was taken against currency ofcer of 1977-79
mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefts were not
withheld ?
57. what is your justifcation , supporting evidence , records for
picking up only three ofcers including mr.G.Hariram for legal
prosecution and leaving the majority of probables ?
58. why you have dropped charges against fve asst treasurers ? why
you didn't even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone
legal prosecution ?
59. Is it RBI's & CBI's way of fair play & justice ?
60. as inly 5% sampling of verifed note bundles are done , there are
more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed
95% lot , isn't it ?
61. you have left out so many ofcers who worked in those sections,
some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being
charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?
62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the
alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?
63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted ,
dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?
64. you don't have any internal statuotary records to prove that
mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency ofcer's
ofce note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the
alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted
just to fx mr.G.Hariram ?
65. where as you have records of other ofcials attendance in those
departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?
66. three ofcers of staf grade A daily work in three sections out
of 40 ofcers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of
1095 working days , he has worked for only 223 days in those
sections , still those ofcers who worked for more days in those
sections are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management
expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction
certifcates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say
on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they
were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by
mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI
higher authorities to fx innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?
67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of
crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst
treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let of
why ?
68. the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of
defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say
substitution of defaced notes only ? is not there diference between
loss of one number of note & 100 number of notes ?
69. as per the normal course of duty , staf ofcers does not
count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of
bundles only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles
containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the
failure of statuotary system of work practices ?
70. does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI
were hell bent to fx mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original
criminals ?
Questions with respect to other cases :
71. how do you monitor the work of bank ofcials nominated as
directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?
72. how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks
have invested ?
73. how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank
ofcials , who work in shares investment / equity funds section ,
etc ?
74. inspite of project reports by bank ofcials , over
assessment of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank
ofcials , the loans become NPAs & full value cann't be realized in
the market by selling of the assets of debtor companies also. In such
cases , what action is taken against erring bank ofcials who collude
with criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than
permissible ?
75. give bankwise specifc fgures of NPAs.
76. give names of industrial groups / promoters whose
companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them ,
before investing in new companies promoted by them.
77. is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through
rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?
78. why not criminal complaints fled against bank mangers for
aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?
79. if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.
10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a
debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ?
but debtors of crores of rupees is let of coolly by banks , why ?
80. what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer
by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?
81. what action has been taken against those involved ?
82. have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi
during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are
powerful & bigwigs ?
83. how you are controlling the illegal fnance activities ,
money lending by individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?
84. how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations ,
foreign donations by many NGOs ?
85. how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn
brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal fnance activities ?
Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE
86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at
security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?
87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for
what criminal roles ?
88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the
security set-up in R.B.I ?
90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are
accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?
91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process
are accounted for?
92. How the fnished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?
93. Who keeps physical fgures & possession of goods, inventory of
all the above?
94. How the scrap paper is disposed of ?
95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?
96. Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?
97. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?
98. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the
post of process assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the
year 1996-1998 ?
99. is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary
laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?
100. still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous
information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons
will come out of cubboard ?
101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI
Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of
rupees ? if not why ?
102. give me specifc fgures bank wise with respect to loss caused
to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?
103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing
huge losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?
YEAR
1988 onwards . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :
CPIO , C/o PCGM and Secretary , Secretarys Department , Reserve Bank of India , 16
th foor, Central Ofce Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg , Mumbai 400 001

FEES PAID : IPO 22F 282808 for rupees ten only



REVENUE Ofcials Hiding Crime Information






READ DETAILS AT :

Main A :
1. The land encroachments & illegal buildings and its continued existence since
years is not possible without tacit , covert support of jurisdictional revenue ofcials.
What disciplinary action has been taken against concerned ofcials with respect to
each case of land encroachment & illegal buildings , case wise ?
2. If not , why ?
3. Is not land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME itself illegal ?
4. Is not the move of government of Karnataka to legalise land encroachments &
illegal buildings , in itself illegal ?
5. Till date in some cases of land encroachers are evicted & some buildings violating
building byelaws demolished , you could have spared them to enjoy the beneft of land
akrama sakrama scheme. Why you didnt spare them ?
6. Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?
7. Does this scheme also beneft rich people above BPL ?
8. Does this scheme also beneft big land developers , land developing companies ?
9. To my previous RTI appeals to MUDA , BDA only partial information was given ,
conveniently hiding the truth. Is it not violation of RTI act ?
10. Does not hiding information about land crimes , in itself also a crime ?
11. I have shown in detail some land crimes in Karnataka. What action by government
of Karnataka , casewise ?
12. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
13. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
14. Does not hiding a land crime , embolden land grabber to commit more land
crimes ?

Main B : RTI QUESTIONS Mysore DC , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE
URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) & COMMISSIONER OF MCC
( MYSORE CITY CORPORATION ) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modifed
the mysore city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modifcation
by the authorities ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site
to commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already
full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate
diference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating
building bye-laws no set of , no parking space , no emergency fre exit , no
earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?
9. how much of MUDA's / MCC's / GOVERNMENT's lands , sites , buildings & houses
have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such
illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has
legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA's / MCC's resolution
instead of of reallotting the same through public notifcation to the next senior most in
the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not
done so why ?
12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of
lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?
13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have
mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate frms among
them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since
1987 till date ?
14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT fled criminal complaints against such illegal
housing societies & illegal real estate frms ? if not why ?
15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate frms &
housing societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic
amenities , parking space , emergency fre exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of
people frst. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as
penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing
those
violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT . When public people die , sufer injuries / accidents say during a fre
tragedy in a complex due to lack of fre exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in
front of a business complex as the complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own ,
the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents ,
injuries & deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for those
accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn
allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists ,
politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have
benefted from these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ? specifc
fgures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have
violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live
On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA /
AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute
force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC /
GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning thousands
of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even fles police complaint against
them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fne. Why this
double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC
/ GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise fgures ?
22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal
occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered
the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
24. have you fled police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if not
why ?
25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufcient time to
bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the
same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it
at a premium , by way making profts just like a real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers,
forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers
have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the beneft of
whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA /
MCC /
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about
welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , flled
with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other land developers ?
31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many
are created till date ?
32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential
areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT
lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle
of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks ,
rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of
taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of
electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under
& surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specifc fgures yearwise since 1987 castewise ,
religionwise ?
34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA & private
developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC &
other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , fats , residential layouts developed by private real
estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in
their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the
environment & creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring
sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore city ? what
action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise
since 1987 till date .
38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired
by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single frm or single
owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands
to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA /
MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial
usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / frm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it
legal ? is it within the KIADB's
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?
40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for
objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA's / MCC's CDP & KIADB's
industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers & Private companies ? on
what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya
Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while
building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been
alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance
to MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning of the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was
there any pre-qualifcation to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used
for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open
for alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper .
no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated of
their dues & the private frm made huge profts. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime
lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare.
however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial
purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been
taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date?
what action taken by MUDA , MCC & government action taken report yearwise since
1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or
authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media
publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE
ofcials & their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage
conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either
partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before
the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of
leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?

Main C : RTI QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA
PALIKE ( BBMP ) & CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT
BOARD ( KIADB) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised /
modifed the Bangalore city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modifcation
by the authorities ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site
to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already
full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting
market rate diference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating
building bye-laws no set of , no parking space , no emergency fre exit , no
earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report
yearwise ?
9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings &
houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against
each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same
through public notifcation to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice
of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in
reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure
followed ?
13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have
mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate frms among
them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & how many
not ? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT fled criminal complaints against
such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate frms ? if not why ?
15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real
estate frms & housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic
amenities , parking space , emergency fre exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of
people frst. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a
pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators
& legalizing those violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected
by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public people die , sufer injuries /
accidents say during a fre tragedy in a complex due to lack of fre exit , when people
park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn't have
a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on
road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of
Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges ,
journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have
benefted from these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT? specifc fgures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have
violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live
On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts &
evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally
occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build
big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT or authorities not even fles police complaint against them instead
regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fne. Why this double standard
by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise fgures ?
22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are
under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
24. have you fled police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if not
why ?
25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufcient time
to bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for
the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from
farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profts just like a real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers,
forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers
have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the beneft of
whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay
compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , flled
with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or
other land developers ?
31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create
new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?
32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential
areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT
lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle
of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks ,
rented out advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending
lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of
electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under & surrounding HT
lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specifc fgures yearwise since 1987
castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT & private developers , the sewage water generated in those
areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT & other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , fats , residential layouts developed by private real
estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in
their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the
environment & creating public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since
1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around bangalore city ? what
action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report
yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are
acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single frm
or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold
those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from
agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / frm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it
legal ? is it within the KIADB's comprehensive industrial area development plan ?
40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice
calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT's industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP &
INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &
Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya
Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while
building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been
alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance
to MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning of the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was
there any pre-qualifcation to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used
for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open
for alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper .
no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated of
their dues & the private frm made huge profts. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime
lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare.
however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial
purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been
taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date?
what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken report
yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media
publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT ofcials & their family members , who have land acquisition /
denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have
sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the
sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?
56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter
no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.
57. why BDA didn't fle police complaint to evict encroachers?
58. why BDA didn't inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of
their allotment ?
59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?
60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the
resolution of BDA committee legal ?
61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , frst it must have informed the
original allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufcient time to reply with
public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the
senior most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal
encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?
62. BDA ofcials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the said fle concerning
this issue cann't be found ie lost . is it legal ?
63. has the BDA fled police complaint regarding theft of fle from the record room ?
HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING
ARTICLE.


CPIO , Chief Ministers ofce , GOK , Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore .




DOT Ofcials Hiding Crime Information





M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , Mysore renamed as M/s RPG Telecom Ltd again
renamed as M/s RPG Cables Ltd once again renamed as M/s KEC International ,
Mysore used to manufacture PIJF & OFC telecables and supplied it to department
of telecommunications , government of india , Indian Railways and GAIL , PGCIL of
Ministry of Petroleum . DOT used to pay hundreds of crores of rupees from public
exchequer to buy these cables . There is also one more company by name M/s
Concepta Cables Ltd , Mysore belonging to the same industrial group supplying PIJF
& OFC telecables to DOT. As a public , as a citizen of india and as a tax payer I
want to know whether those crores of rupees from public exchequer are well spent.

1. How many times the above said companies were blacklisted by DOT , Supreme
Court of India and other quasi judicial bodies , casewise ?
2. What action taken by DOT & judicial bodies against the above companies ,
casewise ?
3. How many cable kms of cable supplied by above companies , were rejected by
DOT from the feld yearwise , since 1986 ?
4. Did the above companies replace all the cables rejected by DOT & make good all
the losses , yearwise ?
5. If not , why ?
6. What action taken by DOT , casewise ?
7. How many cable kms of cables supplied by above companies were accepted on
deviation by DOT yearwise ? on what basis ?
8. Has the DOT authorised usage of recycled materials in the manufacture of
cables ?
9. If yes , on what basis ?
10. Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing process by above
companies to third parties , casewise ?
11. How many cable kms of telecom cables supplied by above companies have failed
during usage within the warranty period , yearwise ?
12. Did the above companies honour warranty contract in all such cases ?
13. If not why , casewise ?
14. What action by DOT , casewise ?

CPIO , Department of Telecommunications , GOI , Sanchar Bhawan , Raf Marg , New
Delhi - 110001 .




$%%!$& U'D!( S!) *+ ,-. OF (/0 $)/ 1223 OF OV!('4!'/ OF 0'D0$
& OV!('4!'/ OF 5$('$/$5$
$%%&0)$/0O' FO( 0'FO(4$/0O' $S %!( (/0 $)/ 1223
, S!! (U&! 11 OF (/0 $)/ 1223 .

(/0 First $ppeal "efore 6
Shri . 4.5. 7an8ura 9
(egistrar & (/0 First $ppellate $uthority 9
Supreme )ourt of 0ndia 9
'ew Delhi .

(ef 6 Dy 'o *2:;<(/0<*;-*3<S)0 dated 2+.2=.12*;

FU&& '$4! OF /7! $%%&0)$'/ 6 '$$($J$.4.(.

$DD(!SS OF /7! $%%&0)$'/ 6 '$$($J$.4.(.9
!D0/O( 9 SOS !-VO0)! JUS/0)! & SOS !-)&$(0O' OF D$&0/ 9
> &0-1 < =:*9 O%% ?$/!( ?O(5S OFF0)!9
7UD)O F0(S/ S/$!9 &$@405$'/$'$$(9
7!""$&9 4ASO(! 9 5$('$/$5$ %0' B 3=22*=.

C%ower will go to the hands of rascals9 9 rogues and freeDooters. $ll 0ndian
leaders will De of low caliDre and men of straw. /hey will haEe sweet
tongues and silly hearts. /hey will fight among themselEes for power and
will De lost in political sFuaDDles . $ day would come when eEen air &
water will De taGed.C Sir ?inston made this statement in the 7ouse of
)ommons 8ust Defore the independence of 0ndia & %akistan. Sadly 9 the
forewarning of &ate ?inston )hurchill has Deen proEed right Dy some
of our criminal 9 corrupt peopleHs representatiEes 9 police 9 puDlic
serEants & Judges. Some of the Delow mentioned 8udges fall among
the category of churchillHs men B (ogues 9 (ascals & FreeDooters.

!Eenthough the information is readily aEailaDle with S)0 9 information
was denied citing unaEailaDility. 0f at all information is not truly aEailaDle
9 why didnHt the )%0O /($'SF!( rti application to concerned
departments of S)0 9 4inistry of &aw 9 Justice 9 (espectiEe 7igh )ourts 9
etc.

/he action of )%0O S)0 amounts to coEer up of 8udges & their crimes.
/hereDy 9 )%0O is also committing a crime. ?ith respect to preEious
(/0 $ppeals also )%0O & (/0 First $ppellate $uthority S)0 haEe
repeatedly committed crimes Dy coEering up 8udges & their crimes.
"illions of indians are Darely sustaining on a single piece meal a day 9 we
lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees
Dut still paying taG. 0s it not shame to them < shame to JUD!s that they
draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money 9 from
taGes paid Dy us still not do their constitutional duties properly.

0V! ?7$/ $)/0O' 7$S "!!' /$5!' $$0'S/ /7! U0&/A JUD!S
4!'/0O'!D 0' /7! "!&O? 4!'/0O'!D ?!" S0/!S & FO&&O?0'
$(/0)&!S.

?e salute honest few in puDlic serEice 9 Judiciary 9 police 9
parliament & state legislatiEe assemDlies. our whole hearted respects to
them. 7!(!"A 9 0 DO 7U4"&A (!IU!S/ AOU /O 0V! 4! ?(0//!'
S/$/!4!'/S < $'S?!(S /O /7! FO&&O?0' IU!S/0O'S B ?70)7 0'
0/S!&F , ie answers . $(! /7! 0'FO(4$/0O' SOU7/ "A 4!. 7!(! ?0/7 0
$4 S!!50' 'O/ /7! O%0'0O'S $"OU/ SO4! 7A%O/7!/0)$& 0SSU!S 9 "U/
AOU( OFF0)0$& S/$'D 9 &!$& S/$'D O' 0SSU!S ?70)7 $(! OF
F(!IU!'/ O))U((!')! ?70)7 $(! V0O&$/0' %!O%&!HS FU'D$4!'/$&
(07/S & 7U4$' (07/S. ?! DO 7$V! 707!S/ (!S%!)/S FO(
JUD0)0$(A & $&& %U"&0) 0'S/0/U/0O'S 9 /70S 0S $' $%%!$& FO( /(U/7 9
0'FO(4$/0O' SO /7$/ /O $%%(!7!'D )O((U%/ F!? 0' %U"&0) S!(V0)!9
?7O $(! $0D0' & $"!//0' /!((O(0S4 9 U'D!(?O(&D & )(040'$&S. 0
7$V! S7O?' 0' D!/$0& ?0/7 &0V! 9 $)/U$& )$S!S 9 !@$4%&!S 9 7O?
0'D0$' &!$& SAS/!4 0S 4$'0%U&$/!D "A )(040'$&S ?0/70' JUD0)0$(A 9
%O&0)! 9 %(OS!)U/0O' 9 !/). (!$D D!/$0&S $/ 6
https6<<sites.google.com<site<eclarionofdalit<wheeling-dealing-8udges-
police 9
Atrocities o !o"e #$ %&'(E)
*tt+s://sites.google.co"/site/eclarioo,dalit/atrocities-#$-judges

$ B J of 4anipulation of 0ndian &egal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18757520/!-"-of-#$%ipul$tio%-of-&%di$-'eg$l-
()stem *
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17+85,5,1/-hief-.ustice-of-&%di$-!--rimi%$l *

.ustice ($th$siv$m - !re )ou /0!1 /2#3 4 3'&5/
https://sites.google.com/site/ecl$rio%ofd$lit/justice-s$th$siv$m---$re-)ou-
de$f-dumb-bli%d *
6$jiv 7$%dhi !ss$ssi%$tio% -over-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/r$jiv-g$%dhi-
$ss$ssi%$tio%-cover-up *
(8!#0 (8!#0 #9s 4 #'!s
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/sh$me-sh$me-mps-ml$s
*
.2/70s or 3rokers of .ustice
justice *

6:& 4 '$%d 7olm$$l
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-l$%d-golm$$l-i%-
k$r%$t$k$ *
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/l$%d-gr$bbers-i%-m-u-d-$
*
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-l$%d-
sc$ms *

7ereDy 9 we do reFuest )%0O O<O 7onouraDle )hief Justice of 0ndia 9
Supreme )ourt of 0ndia 9 'ew Delhi to answer the following Fuestions in
puDlic interest 9 for safeguarding national security 9 'ational unity &
integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals 9 criminals within the
8udiciary & police.

1 . 8ow m$%) judges $re booked for gr$ft * se;u$l crimes * crimes $g$i%st
wome% * irregul$rities * $m$ssi%g disproportio%$te we$lth * f$ilure of dut) *
getti%g illeg$l $llotme%t of sites 4 other crimes si%ce i%depe%de%ce till d$te
* )e$rwise <
2. wh$t $ctio% t$ke% c$sewise <
+. $re the $ctio% t$ke% simil$r to commo%ers * commo% people committi%g
s$me t)pe of crimes <
,. did $ll the c$ses h$%dled b) t$i%ted judges subjected to review * retri$l
b) other ho%est judges <
5. how m$%) $dvoc$tes were prosecuted b) court for i%flue%ci%g wit%esses /
evide%ces * for tutored / co%cocted evide%ces * etc si%ce i%depe%de%ce till
d$te * )e$rwise < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
. how m$%) police offici$ls / l$w e%forci%g offici$ls were prosecuted b)
court for i%flue%ci%g * i%timid$ti%g wit%esses through thre$ts * +rddegree
torture * for co%cocted evide%ces * etc si%ce i%depe%de%ce till d$te *
)e$rwise < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
7. how m$%) police / l$w e%forceme%t offici$ls were prosecuted for lock-up
de$ths * f$ke e%cou%ters * illeg$l dete%tio% * +rd degree torture * etc si%ce
i%depe%de%ce till d$te * )e$rwise < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
8. i% how m$%) c$ses police / l$w e%forceme%t offici$ls were m$de to p$)
compe%s$tio% to i%%oce%t victims who were wro%gl) ch$rged * det$i%ed 4
tortured * murdered b) police * si%ce i%depe%de%ce till d$te * )e$rwise <
wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
=. i% some c$ses * o% $ppe$l judgeme%ts of higher court tur%s dow% the
judgeme%t of lower court. &% how m$%) such c$ses * lower court judge is
m$de to p$) compe%s$tio% to victims of their wro%g judgeme%t * si%ce
i%depe%de%ce till d$te )e$rwise < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
10. how m$%) judges h$ve def$ulted i% fili%g their $%%u$l fi%$%ci$l retur%s
givi%g out their we$lth * i%come det$ils * )e$rwise si%ce i%depe%de%ce till
d$te < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
11. how )ou $re verif)i%g the $%%u$l fi%$%ci$l retur%s of judges <
12. si%ce i%depe%de%ce * how m$%) co%victs h$ve bee% se%te%ced to >de$th
b) h$%gi%g? * )e$rwise <
1+. how m$%) de$th se%t$%ces were c$rried out 4 how m$%) $re pe%di%g <
1,. how m$%) police offici$ls were m$de to p$) compe%s$tio% 4 prosecuted
for def$m$tio% * whe% i%%oce%ts f$lsel) ch$rged b) police were $c@uitted *
dropped from ch$rges b) courts < if %ot wh) <
15. how m$%) lower court judges were m$de to p$) compe%s$tio% 4
prosecuted for def$m$tio% * whe% i%%oce%ts wro%gl) co%victed b) lower
court * but o% $ppe$l higher courts $c@uitti%g * droppi%g them of ch$rges < if
%ot wh) <
1. $re judges getti%g p$id from public e;che@uer * for their e;pe%ses o%
li@uor / $lcohol * bod) m$ss$ges * etc i% their :! /! bill while o% tour *
offici$l visits * offici$l p$rties hosted b) judges <
17. how m$%) $ppe$ls for justice co%cer%i%g public welf$re * viol$tio% of
hum$% 4 fu%d$me%t$l rights * thre$t to lives / livelihood * etc were m$de
to supreme court of i%di$ * b) %$g$r$j$ m)sore r$ghup$thi $li$s %$g$r$j$ #
6 $li$s m)self si%ce 1==0 till d$te < $ppe$ls were m$de through ordi%$r)
post * registered post * e-m$il 4 b) web through /!697 * /97. Ah$t
!-:&B5 t$ke% b) supreme court of i%di$ with respect to e$ch $ppe$l <
18. due to %eglige%ce / co%%iv$%ce of supreme court judges i%justices were
meted out to public 4 public $re still sufferi%g i%justices. -rimes which
could h$ve bee% preve%ted b) (- h$ppe%ed eve%though brought to e$rl)
%otice of supreme court. Ah$t $ctio% $g$i%st erri%g (- .udges < if %ot wh) <
1=. & h$ve repe$tedl) offered m) services to supreme court of i%di$ * to
$pprehe%d crimi%$ls withi% judici$r) * police 4 public service. Ah$t $ctio%
t$ke% b) supreme court of i%di$ < if %ot wh) <
20. i% m) leg$l struggle for justice * due to %eglige%ce / co%%iv$%ce of (-&
judges & h$ve suffered murder $ttempts o% m) life * job losses * m)
%ewsp$per closed * %ot getti%g press $ccredit$tio% to m) web %ews p$pers *
thre$ts b) rowdies * police * etc. wh$t $ctio% $g$i%st erri%g chief justice of
i%di$ < if %ot wh) <
22. & repe$tedl) $ppe$led to supreme court of i%di$ to permit me to $ppe$r
$s $micus curie before supreme court of i%di$ 4 j$i% commissio% of e%@uir)
reg$rdi%g l$te 9# 6$jiv 7$%dhi $ss$ssi%$tio% c$se. & w$s %ot permitted
wh) <
2+. who $re the judges coveri%g-up 6$jiv 7$%dhi $ss$ssi%$tio% c$se < wh$t
$ctio% t$ke% < if %ot wh) <
2,. '$w is o%e 4 s$me for $ll * but l$w e%forceme%t 4 l$w i%terpret$tio% is
%ot s$me for commo% people * .udges 4 9olice < wh) <

A!$( /O ?70)7 $"OV! %!(/$0'S 6 4$JO(0/A OF DO)U4!'/S %!(/$0'S
/O A!$( *++2-12*; . SO4! OF /7! DO)U4!'/S $(! D$/!D "$)5 /O
*+;=.
%U"&0) 0'FO(4$/0O' OFF0)!( ?7O F$0&!D /O 0V! 0'FO(4$/0O' 6
)%0O 9 o<o )hief Justice of 0ndia 9 SU%(!4! )OU(/ OF 0'D0$ 9 '!?
D!&70.

F!!S %$0D 6 0%O 11F 1K1K23 for rupees ten only

D$/! 6 *3.2K.12*; LLLLL..LLLLLLLLL'$$($J$.4.(.

%&$)! 6 4ASO(! 9 0'D0$L.. LLLLLLLLL., $%%&0)$'/.

?ritten $rgument B (/0 $%%!$&

$t the outset 9 we eGpress our whole hearted respects to the honest
few puDlic serEants in puDlic serEice including 8udiciary. 7oweEer9 the
corrupt in puDlic serEice donHt deserEe respect as indiEiduals B as they
are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they occupy
Dut not the corrupt indiEiduals.

$ll the following articles < issues 9 whole articles puDlished in the
weDlinks mentioned Delow forms part of this appeal. /he
term MJUD!Nmentioned throught includes all puDlic serEants
discharging 8udicial functions right from taluk magistrates 9 Fuasi-8udicial
officers to )hief Justice of 0ndia.

0ndian &egal < Judicial System is manipulated at Earious stages & is for
sale. 0t is a S7$4!. /he persons who raise their Eoice seeking 8ustice
are silenced in many ways. /he criminal neGus has already attempted to
silence me in many ways . 0f anything untoward happens to me or to my
family memDers 9 my dependents 9 7onouraDle )hief Justice of 0ndia
together with 8urisdictional police officer will De responsiDle for it.

7ereDy9 we do once again offer our conditional serEices to the
honouraDle supreme court of 0ndia & other goEernment authorities9 in
apprehending criminals including corrupt 8udges & police. 7erewith 9 we
once again appeal to the honouraDle supreme court of 0ndia 9 to
consider this as a %0& $ppeal in puDlic interest.

/o my repeated appeals for 8ustice 9 repeated appeals to utiliOe my
serEices to apprehend criminals 9 repeated %0& petitions 9 repeated
appeals for information under (/0 act 9 your response was silence with
respect to (/0 applications literally no information was giEen to ++P
of Fueries nor you transferred the Fueries to respectiEe department
which can proEide answer . /his silence or intentional negligence of
duty amounts to crime coEer Bup. Due to improper action on
your part crimes which could haEe Deen nipped at the Dud ,information
of crime giEen Dy us to S)0. happened 9 which amounts to aDetting
crime. Once again if you deny me information to following Fueries 9
you are reinforcing the proof that concerned supreme court of india
8udges are also )(040'$&S themselEes. $nswer following Fuestions 6

1 . 8ow m$%) judges $re booked for gr$ft * se;u$l crimes * crimes $g$i%st
wome% * irregul$rities * $m$ssi%g disproportio%$te we$lth * f$ilure of dut) *
getti%g illeg$l $llotme%t of sites 4 other crimes si%ce i%depe%de%ce till d$te
* )e$rwise <
2. wh$t $ctio% t$ke% c$sewise <
+. $re the $ctio% t$ke% simil$r to commo%ers * commo% people committi%g
s$me t)pe of crimes <
,. did $ll the c$ses h$%dled b) t$i%ted judges subjected to review * retri$l
b) other ho%est judges <
5. how m$%) $dvoc$tes were prosecuted b) court for i%flue%ci%g wit%esses /
evide%ces * for tutored / co%cocted evide%ces * etc si%ce i%depe%de%ce till
d$te * )e$rwise < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
. how m$%) police offici$ls / l$w e%forci%g offici$ls were prosecuted b)
court for i%flue%ci%g * i%timid$ti%g wit%esses through thre$ts * +rddegree
torture * for co%cocted evide%ces * etc si%ce i%depe%de%ce till d$te *
)e$rwise < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
7. how m$%) police / l$w e%forceme%t offici$ls were prosecuted for lock-up
de$ths * f$ke e%cou%ters * illeg$l dete%tio% * +rd degree torture * etc si%ce
i%depe%de%ce till d$te * )e$rwise < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
8. i% how m$%) c$ses police / l$w e%forceme%t offici$ls were m$de to p$)
compe%s$tio% to i%%oce%t victims who were wro%gl) ch$rged * det$i%ed 4
tortured * murdered b) police * si%ce i%depe%de%ce till d$te * )e$rwise <
wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
=. i% some c$ses * o% $ppe$l judgeme%ts of higher court tur%s dow% the
judgeme%t of lower court. &% how m$%) such c$ses * lower court judge is
m$de to p$) compe%s$tio% to victims of their wro%g judgeme%t * si%ce
i%depe%de%ce till d$te )e$rwise < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
10. how m$%) judges h$ve def$ulted i% fili%g their $%%u$l fi%$%ci$l retur%s
givi%g out their we$lth * i%come det$ils * )e$rwise si%ce i%depe%de%ce till
d$te < wh$t $ctio% < if %ot wh) <
11. how )ou $re verif)i%g the $%%u$l fi%$%ci$l retur%s of judges <
12. si%ce i%depe%de%ce * how m$%) co%victs h$ve bee% se%te%ced to >de$th
b) h$%gi%g? * )e$rwise <
1+. how m$%) de$th se%t$%ces were c$rried out 4 how m$%) $re pe%di%g <
1,. how m$%) police offici$ls were m$de to p$) compe%s$tio% 4 prosecuted
for def$m$tio% * whe% i%%oce%ts f$lsel) ch$rged b) police were $c@uitted *
dropped from ch$rges b) courts < if %ot wh) <
15. how m$%) lower court judges were m$de to p$) compe%s$tio% 4
prosecuted for def$m$tio% * whe% i%%oce%ts wro%gl) co%victed b) lower
court * but o% $ppe$l higher courts $c@uitti%g * droppi%g them of ch$rges < if
%ot wh) <
1. $re judges getti%g p$id from public e;che@uer * for their e;pe%ses o%
li@uor / $lcohol * bod) m$ss$ges * etc i% their :! /! bill while o% tour *
offici$l visits * offici$l p$rties hosted b) judges <
17. how m$%) $ppe$ls for justice co%cer%i%g public welf$re * viol$tio% of
hum$% 4 fu%d$me%t$l rights * thre$t to lives / livelihood * etc were m$de
to supreme court of i%di$ * b) %$g$r$j$ m)sore r$ghup$thi $li$s %$g$r$j$ #
6 $li$s m)self si%ce 1==0 till d$te < $ppe$ls were m$de through ordi%$r)
post * registered post * e-m$il 4 b) web through /!697 * /97. Ah$t
!-:&B5 t$ke% b) supreme court of i%di$ with respect to e$ch $ppe$l <
18. due to %eglige%ce / co%%iv$%ce of supreme court judges i%justices were
meted out to public 4 public $re still sufferi%g i%justices. -rimes which
could h$ve bee% preve%ted b) (- h$ppe%ed eve%though brought to e$rl)
%otice of supreme court. Ah$t $ctio% $g$i%st erri%g (- .udges < if %ot wh) <
1=. & h$ve repe$tedl) offered m) services to supreme court of i%di$ * to
$pprehe%d crimi%$ls withi% judici$r) * police 4 public service. Ah$t $ctio%
t$ke% b) supreme court of i%di$ < if %ot wh) <
20. i% m) leg$l struggle for justice * due to %eglige%ce / co%%iv$%ce of (-&
judges & h$ve suffered murder $ttempts o% m) life * job losses * m)
%ewsp$per closed * %ot getti%g press $ccredit$tio% to m) web %ews p$pers *
thre$ts b) rowdies * police * etc. wh$t $ctio% $g$i%st erri%g chief justice of
i%di$ < if %ot wh) <
22. & repe$tedl) $ppe$led to supreme court of i%di$ to permit me to $ppe$r
$s $micus curie before supreme court of i%di$ 4 j$i% commissio% of e%@uir)
reg$rdi%g l$te 9# 6$jiv 7$%dhi $ss$ssi%$tio% c$se. & w$s %ot permitted
wh) <
2+. who $re the judges coveri%g-up 6$jiv 7$%dhi $ss$ssi%$tio% c$se < wh$t
$ctio% t$ke% < if %ot wh) <
2,. '$w is o%e 4 s$me for $ll * but l$w e%forceme%t 4 l$w i%terpret$tio% is
%ot s$me for commo% people * .udges 4 9olice < wh) <

/he puDlic serEants & the goEernment must De role models in law
aDiding acts 9 for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is eGcusaDle & can De corrected Dy the teacher. if the teacher
himself makes a mistake 9 all his students will do the same mistake. if a
thief steals 9 he can De caught 9 legally punished & reformed . if a police
himself commits crime 9 many thieEes go scot- free under his patronage.
eEen if a police 9 puDlic serEant commits a crime 9 he can De legally
prosecuted & 8ustice can De sought Dy the aggrieEed. 8ust think 9 if a
8udge himself that too of apeG court of the land itself commits crime -
Eiolations of (/0 $ct 9 constitutional rights & human rights of puDlic and
oDstructs the puDlic from performing their constitutional fundamental
duties 9 what happens # it giEes a Dooster dose to the rich & mighty 9
those in power 9 criminals in puDlic serEice to committ more crimes.
that is eGactly what is happenning in india. the educated puDlic must
raise to the occassion & peacefully 9 democratically must oppose this
criminalisation of 8udiciary 9 puDlic serEice. then alone 9 we can Duild a
($4 ($JA$ OF 4$7$/4$ $'D70QS D(!$4.

.idl$ go t*roug* t*e ,ollo/ig articles 0 +ro1ide justice #$ gi1ig
co"+lete trut*,ul i,or"atio to us 2 #$ +u#licl$ as/erig t*e
,ollo/ig 3uestioaire i a ua"#iguous "aer.

4*e costitutio o, Idia *as +rescri#ed certai 5&N'AMEN4A6 '&4IE)
to eac* citi7es o, Idia. It is t*e dut$ o, e1er$ citi7e to +rotect 0
u+*old t*e digit$ 2 *oour o, our de"ocratic istitutios 2 to
+rotect our atioal itegrit$ 2 to res+ect 0 +rotect t*e rig*ts o, our
,ello/ citi7es. No costitutioal aut*orit$ *as t*e rig*t to o#struct
t*e disc*arge o, t*ese duties #$ citi7es o, Idia. No legal +ri1ileges o,
costitutioal ,uctioaries is su+erior o1er t*e 5&N'AMEN4A6 '&4IE)
85 9I4I:EN;) 85 IN'IA.
!e eed rig*ts to +er,or" our duties. 9ostitutio o, Idia *as
guarateed t*ose rig*ts as 5&N'AMEN4A6 RI(<4) to all citi7es o, Idia
0 #$ #irt* itsel, e1er$oe o, us *as secured <&MAN RI(<4) as
idi1iduals. 4o e=+ress oursel1es 2 /e eed i,or"atio 2 data ,eed
#ac> 2 to ascertai /*et*er /e are gettig e3ual o++ortuit$ 2 /*et*er
/e are gettig e3uita#le justice 2 etc 2 /e eed i,or"atio . so 2
#asicall$ Rig*t 4o I,or"atio is a ialiea#le +art o, our
,uda"etal rig*ts 0 *u"a rig*ts. !*at R4I Act *as doe is ,i=ed ti"e
li"it 2 res+osi#ilities o, +u#lic ser1ats u+ to certai e=tet.
<o/e1er t*e citi7e;s ,uda"etal rig*t 0 *u"a rig*t to see>
i,or"atio e=teds ,ar #e$od t*e sco+e o, R4I Act.
<ere#$ 2 /e see> co"+lete trut*,ul i,or"atio ,ro" su+re"e court o,
Idia 2 /it* res+ect to "$ R4I a++licatio a++eal. <ERE?@ 2 !E ARE
8N6@ )EE.IN( A998&N4A?I6I4@ 85 A&?6I9 )ERVAN4) IN A&?6I9
IN4ERE)4 0 %&)4I9E. <ere#$ 2 /e re3uest $ou to register t*is a++eal
as a AI6 +etitio 0 to ascertai t*e stad o, a+e= court o 1arious
"atters raised i "$ R4I A++licatio 2 i +u#lic iterest 0 e3uita#le
justice. Read :

'otice to )J0 Justice ( 4 &odha
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/%otice-to-cji-justice-r-m-
lodh$ 9

?hy 'O/ %unishment for (apist Judges & %olice #
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/wh)-%ot-pu%ishme%t-for-
r$pist-judges-police

?e salute honest few in puDlic serEice 9 Judiciary 9 police 9 parliament
& state legislatiEe assemDlies. our whole hearted respects to them.
7!(!"A 9 0 DO 7U4"&A (!IU!S/ AOU /O 0V! 4! ?(0//!' S/$/!4!'/S <
$'S?!(S /O /7! FO&&O?0' IU!S/0O'S B ?70)7 0' 0/S!&F , ie
answers . $(! /7! 0'FO(4$/0O' SOU7/ "A 4!. 7!(! ?0/7 0 $4
S!!50' 'O/ /7! O%0'0O'S $"OU/ SO4! 7A%O/7!/0)$& 0SSU!S 9 "U/
F(!IU!'/ O))U((!')! ?70)7 $(! V0O&$/0' %!O%&!HS FU'D$4!'/$&
(07/S & 7U4$' (07/S. ?! DO 7$V! 707!S/ (!S%!)/S FO(
JUD0)0$(A & $&& %U"&0) 0'S/0/U/0O'S 9 /70S 0S $' $%%!$& FO( /(U/7 9
0'FO(4$/0O' SO /7$/ /O $%%(!7!'D )O((U%/ F!? 0' %U"&0) S!(V0)!9
?7O $(! $0D0' & $"!//0' /!((O(0S4 9 U'D!(?O(&D & )(040'$&S. 0
7$V! S7O?' 0' D!/$0& ?0/7 &0V! 9 $)/U$& )$S!S 9 !@$4%&!S 9 7O?
0'D0$' &!$& SAS/!4 0S 4$'0%U&$/!D "A )(040'$&S ?0/70' JUD0)0$(A 9
%O&0)! 9 %(OS!)U/0O' 9 !/). 0 do hope sense of constitutional
propriety 9 8ustice will preEail. J$0 70'D. V$'D! 4$/$($4.

Date 6 *3.2K.12*; AourHs
sincerely9
%lace 6 4ysore 'agara8a.4.(.

%$A U% Justice ( 4 &odha 9 Shri 4 5 7an8ura & Smt Smita Vats Sharma
- D$4$!S %$A4!'/ / F0'$& S7O?-)$US! 'O/0)! /O )70!F JUS/0)!
OF 0'D0$

0 donHt know whether secretariat staff of )J0 office & D$(% < D%
officials are forwarding my appeals for 8ustice 9 e-mails to you or not.
/hey will De held accountaDle for their lapses if any. /his notice is
against the repeated failure of constitutional duties & indirect collusion
with criminals Dy preEious )70!F JUS/0)!s OF 0'D0$. 'otice is serEed
against them 9 to the office of )J0 9 'O/ personally against you. $t the
indiEidual leEel 0 do whole heartedly respect 7onouraDle Justice ( 4
&odha 9 Shri 4 5 7an8ura & Smt Smita Vats Sharma.
%lease refer my appeal for 8ustice through D$(% R
D&&$<!<12*-<221+1
D!%OJ<!<12*-<22:=+

0n india democracy is a farce 9 freedom a mirage. the most Dasic freedom
(07/ /O 0'FO(4$/0O' & !@%(!SS0O' 9 is not honoured Dy
the goEernment9as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.0.%s &
leads to their ill-gotten wealth. /he puDlic serEants are least
Dothered aDout the liEes of people or 8ustice to them. these type of fat
cats 9 parasites are a drain on the puDlic eGcheFuer . these
people want 9wish me to see dead 9 wish to see 7U4$' (07/S ?$/)7
closed . so that9 a Eoice against in8ustices is silenced foreEer 9 the crimes
of V.V.0.%s closed 9 Duried foreEer.
/o my numerous appeals 9 7(?Hs appeals to you 9you haEe not
yet replied. 0t clearly shows that you are least Dothered aDout the
liEes of people or 8ustice to them .it proEes that you are hell Dent
to protect the criminals at any cost. you are 8ust pressurising the police
to enFuire me 9to take my statement9 to repeatedly call me to police
station all with a Eiew to silence me.all of you en8oy Mlegal immunity
priEilegesN 9why donHt you haEe giEen powers to the
police < inEestigating officer to summon all of you for enFuiry #or else
why donHt all of you are not appearing Defore the police Eoluntarily
for enFuiry #at the least why donHt all of you are not sending
your statement aDout the case to the police either through legal counsel
or through post# you are aiding criminals 9Dy denying me
8oD oppurtunities in (.".0 )U((!')A 'O/! %(!SS mysore 9 city ciEil court
9Dangalore 9 distict court 9 mysore 9etc & Dy illegally closing my
newspaper.
there is a gross9 total mismatch Detween your actions and your oath
of office. this amounts to puDlic cheating & moral turpitude on
your part.
*.you are making contempt of the Eery august office you hold.
1.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
-.you are making contempt of citiOens of india.
;.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organiOed crime.
3.you are Eiolating the fundamental & human rights of the citiOens
of india and of neighDouring countries.
:.you are Eiolating & making contempt of the U.' 7U4$' (07/S
)7$(/!( to which india is a signatory.
=.you are oDstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as
a citiOen of india.
K. $s a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you haEe
caused me damages < losses to the tune of (U%!!S /?O )(O(! O'&A.
you are hereDy called upon to %ay damages to me and S7O?-)$US!
within -2 days 9 why you cannHt De legally prosecuted for the aDoEe
mentioned crimes .

0f i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of
inEestigations 9 the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages 9
transportation 9 8oD 9 etc must De Dorne Dy the goEernment. preEoiusly
the police < 0" personnel repeatedly called me the complainant ,sufferer
of in8ustices. to police station for Fuestioning 9 Dut neEer called the
guilty culprits eEen once to police station for Fuestioning 9 as the culprits
are high & mighty . this type of one sided Fuestioning must not De done
Dy police or inEestigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me
or to my family memDers like loss of 8oD 9 meeting with hit & run
accidents 9 loss of liEes 9 etc 9 the 8urisdictional police together with
aDoEe mentioned accussed puDlic serEants 9 )hief Justice of 0ndia &
Jurisdictional District 4agistrate will De responsiDle for it. !Een if
criminal neGus leEels fake charges 9 police file fake cases against me or
my dependents to silence me 9 this complaint is & will De effectiEe.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents 9 the goEernment
of india is liaDle to pay (s. /?O crore as compensation to surEiEors of
my family. if my whole family is eliminated Dy the criminal neGus 9then
that compensation money must De donated to 0ndian $rmy ?elfare Fund.
afterwards 9 the money must De recoEered Dy O0 as land arrears from
the salary 9 pension 9 property 9 etc of guilty 8udges 9 police officials 9
puDlic serEants & )onstitutional fuctionaries. /hanking you. Jai 7ind 9
Vande 4ataram.

Date 6 *3.2K.12*;LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL..yourHs sincerely9
%lace 6 4ysore 9 0ndiaLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL.'agara8a 4 (

)hief Justice of 0ndia , )J0 . a )riminal #
- %0& $ppeal to 7onoraDle Supreme court of 0ndia For ?rit of 4andamu
s

:o*
8o%our$ble 6egistr$r *
(upreme -ourt of &%di$ *
5ew /elhi.

(ubject : 9&' $ppe$l for A6&: B1 #!5/!#2( 4 /iscipli%$r) $ctio% *
crimi%$l proceedi%gs $g$i%st -hief .ustice of &%di$

0 donHt know whether secretariat staff of )J0 office & D$(% < D%
officials are forwarding my appeals for 8ustice 9 e-mails to you or not.
/hey will De held accountaDle for their lapses if any. /his notice is
against the repeated failure of constitutional duties & indirect collusion
with criminals Dy preEious )70!F JUS/0)!s OF 0'D0$. 'otice is serEed
against them 9 to the office of )J0 9 'O/ personally against you. $t the
indiEidual leEel 0 do whole heartedly respect 7onouraDle Justice ( 4
&odha.
%lease refer my appeal for 8ustice through D$(% R
D&&$<!<12*-<221+1
D!%OJ<!<12*-<22:=+

:he chief justice of i%di$ is %ot repl)i%g to m) repe$ted show-c$use %otices *d$m$ge
p$)me%t %otices %or t$ki%g $ppropri$te leg$l $ctio%s * i% time . 8owever the
public serv$%ts t$ke their thous$%ds of rupees s$l$r) 4 perks well i% time without f$il
o% 1st of ever) mo%th. !s $ result of co%ti%ued %eglige%ce of
co%stitutio%$l duties si%ce )e$rs we public $re sufferi%g i%justices * crimes
which could h$ve bee% preve%ted $re t$ki%g pl$ce. :hereb) -.& is $idi%g the crimi%$ls
i% committi%g crimes 4 cover up of crimes * i% the course becomi%g $ crimi%$l
himself. Ae s$lute our freedom fighters * milit$r) perso%%el 4 m$rt)rs for $ll
the s$crifices m$de b) them. 'et us build $ stro%g * (ecul$r * /emocr$tic &%di$
b) getti%g rid off few corrupt eleme%ts * $%ti %$tio%$ls * tr$itors $mo%g
public serv$%ts * $mo%g judici$r) 4$mo%g police who $re gre$ter thre$t to &%di$C
securit) 4 i%tegrit) th$% 9$kist$%i terrorists or chi%ese milit$r).

&%form$tio% i%put forms p$rt of process of o%eCs e;pressio%. B%eCs e;pressio% i% $%)
forms D writte% * or$l * etc becomes i%form$tio% i%put to the opposite perso% * i%
tur% he e;presses his repl). &%form$tio% 4 0;pressio% $re i%sep$r$ble p$rts 4
form lifeli%e of $ democr$c). :h$t is the re$so% * 6ight to 0;pressio% is the
b$sic fu%d$me%t$l right $s well $s hum$% right of ever) &%di$% citiEe%. Ahe%
$ perso%Cs right to e;pressio% is viol$ted * his other rights to e@u$lit) * justice *
etc $lso $re viol$ted. (uppressio% of &%form$tio% $mou%ts to curbi%g of 0;pressio%. &%
$ democr$c) * people h$ve $ right to k%ow how the public serv$%ts $re fu%ctio%i%g .
8owever till d$te publicserv$%ts $re hidi%g behi%d the veil of Bffici$ls (ecrets !ct
Fwhich is of british vi%t$ge cre$ted b) british to suppress %$tive &%di$%s G. 3) this
cover-up public serv$%ts $re hidi%g their ow% corruptio% *
crimes * mism$%$geme%t * f$ilures * etc. eve% 6:& !ct is %ot bei%gfollowed i%toto b)
public serv$%ts. 8owever the rece%t delhi high court ruli%g $ffirmi%g th$t -.& is
u%der 6:& purview 4 bou%d to $%swer 6:& re@uest * is %ote worth). Bur
previous 6:& re@uest to -.& * u%io% home secret$r) of 7B&* 9reside%t of &%di$ * /7
4 &79 of 7BH $%d others were %ot ho%ored. :he i%form$tio% is sought were $%swers
to the followi%g @uestio%s me%tio%ed i% the below me%tio%ed websites . the
@uestio%s co%cer%ed the p$st * prese%t co%ti%ui%g i%justices meted out to
millio%s of &%di$% citiEe%s * due to wro%g / illeg$l workpr$ctices of
&%di$% judges * police 4 public serv$%ts . :he i%form$tio% we sought would
e;pose the tr$itors * $%ti-%$tio%$ls * crimi%$ls i% public service .:he i%form$tio% we
$re seeki%g $re %o defe%se secrets * %o %$tio%$l secrets .:he truthful i%form$tio%
e;poses the $%ti-%$tio%$ls * tr$itors i% the public service 4 stre%gthe%s our %$tio%$l
securit) * %$tio%$l u%it) 4 i%tegrit).

8ereb) * i do re@uest the ho%our$ble supreme court of i%di$ * for $ (upreme -ourt
mo%itored -3& 0%@uir) i%to this whole issue $s k$r%$t$k$ police $re helpless * the)
do%It h$ve leg$l powers to prosecute high 4
might) *co%stitutio%$l fu%ctio%$ries. :he) h$ve %ot eve% e%@uired the guilt)
JJ&9s eve% o%ce however 2%der pressure from higher-ups the)
repe$tedl) c$lled me the compl$i%$%t to police st$tio% took st$teme%ts from
me $ll for closi%g the files. 8ereb) * & do re@uest the ho%or$ble supreme court of
&%di$ to co%sider this $s $ 9&' for : >writ of #$%d$mus? $%d to issue i%structio%s to the
co%cer%ed public serv$%ts i% the followi%g c$ses to perform their duties 4 to $%swer
the @uestio%s. !s the tri$l court .udges cross verif) the $%tecede%ts * histor) of the
p$rties i% $ c$se to $scert$i% p$rt)Cs ho%est) *i%tegrit) * $s the i%vestig$ti%g
police officers cross check the $%tecede%ts * histor) of $
compl$i%$%t / $ccussed /wit%esses to $scert$i% their ho%est) * i%tegrit) of the
$ccussed / compl$i%$%t *i% the s$me w$) the p$rties i% $ c$se * $s compl$i%$%t /
$ccussed / wit%essesh$ve $ right to $scert$i% the i%tegrit) * ho%est) of the tri$l court
judge 4 i%vestig$ti%g police officers to e%sure the) $re %ot bi$sed $%d
provide $ f$ir *level grou%d. .!& 8&5/. J!5/0 #!:!6!#.

/$te: 2.0,.201,
KourCs si%cerel) *
9l$ce : #)sore 5$g$r$j$.#.6

e;--.& 3$l$krish%$% pushed for elev$tio% of corrupt judge
!fter t$rgeti%g former -hief .ustice of &%di$ (8 H$p$di$* 9ress -ou%cil of
&%di$ F9-&G ch$irperso% .ustice #$rk$%de) H$tju o% #o%d$) tr$i%ed gu%s $t
the the% -hief .ustice of &%di$ F-.&G H7 3$l$krish%$%.
(toki%g $ fresh co%trovers)* H$tju $lleged -.& 3$l$krish%$% h$d pushed for
the elev$tio% of $ #$dr$s 8igh -ourt judge with Lb$d reput$tio%L to the
(upreme -ourt.
8e s$id th$t the collegium he$ded b) .ustice 3$l$krish%$% $%d $lso h$vi%g
.ustice H$p$di$ L$lmost suceededL i% bri%gi%g the judge to the $pe; court
but l$w)ers i% the south &%di$% st$te of :$mil 5$du thw$rted it b) produci%g
Lvolumi%ous docume%t$r) evide%ce of his corruptio%.L
.ustice H 7 3$l$krish%$%* ch$irm$% of the 5$tio%$l 8um$% 6ights
-ommissio% F586-G* w$s %ot immedi$tel) $v$il$ble for comme%ts with his
office st$ti%g th$t he is o% $% offici$l tour to #$l$)si$ $%d will be b$ck this
weeke%d.
H$tju h$d e$rlier $ccused .ustice 3$l$krish%$% $%d two other former -.&s of
Limproper compromisesL i% ret$i%i%g $ :$mil 5$du judge u%der corruptio%
cloud duri%g 2%ited 9rogressive !lli$%ce rule. .ustice 3$l$krish%$% h$d
dubbed the $lleg$tio%s $s b$seless.
! former judge of the (upreme -ourt* H$tju m$de the fresh cl$ims o% his
blog while $lso re$cti%g to rem$rks m$de b) .ustice H$p$di$* i% respo%se to
his (u%d$)Is post. .ustice H$p$di$ h$d s$id th$t he h$d %ot brought to
(upreme -ourt $%) u%fit judge.
H$tju $lso ch$rged three former -hief .ustices of &%di$ i%cludi%g KH
($bh$rw$l $%d H7 3$l$krish%$% of succumbi%g to the pressure from the the%
gover%me%t he$ded b) /r. #$%moh$% (i%gh. H$tju though did %ot %$med the
souter% politic$l p$rt) for e;erti%g the pressure* it w$s $ k%ow% f$ct th$t he
w$s referri%g to the /#H which h$d 18 #9s i% the 29! &. :he judge i%
@uestio% .ustice (. !shok Hum$r died i% 200=.
L& m$) remi%d him FH$p$di$G th$t the (upreme -ourt collegium* he$ded b)
Fthe%G -.& H 7 3$l$krish%$%* $%d of which .ustice H$p$di$ w$s $ member*
$lmost succeeded i% bri%gi%g $ tot$ll) u%fit perso% i%to the (upreme -ourt*L
H$tju s$id.
L:h$t judge w$s $ judge of the #$dr$s 8igh -ourt whe% & w$s -hief .ustice
there* so & k%ew $ll $bout his b$d reput$tio%. '$ter* he w$s m$de -hief
.ustice of $%other 8igh -ourt* $%d w$s bei%g co%sidered for elev$tio% to the
(upreme court*L he further s$id.
H$tju s$id th$t o%e d$) duri%g lu%ch i%terv$l* he we%t to .ustice H$p$di$Is
ch$mber $%d told him $bout the Lb$d reput$tio%L of th$t judge* givi%g
det$ils.
L& told him th$t & w$s %ot i% the (upreme -ourt collegium* but he w$s* $%d
%ow it w$s for him to do wh$tever he thi%ks proper* $%d & h$ve do%e m)
dut). :here w$s %o use i%formi%g .ustice 3$l$krish%$% si%ce it w$s he who
w$s pushi%g for the judgeIs elev$tio% to the (upreme -ourt*L he wrote.
H$tju further s$id th$t $fter liste%i%g to him* .ustice H$p$di$ th$%ked him
$%d s$id th$t i% future $lso if he h$s such i%form$tio% it should be p$ssed o%
to him.
L/espite this* the collegium* of which .ustice H$p$di$ w$s $ member*
recomme%ded the %$me of th$t judge h$vi%g @uestio%$ble i%tegrit)* $%d he
would h$ve defi%itel) bee% elev$ted to the (upreme -ourt but for the :$mil
5$du l$w)ers who produced volumi%ous docume%t$r) evide%ce of his
corruptio%*L H$tju wrote.
1ormer !ttor%e) 7e%er$l (oli (or$bjee s$id the collegium s)stem is %ot
perfect but $tt$cki%g it the w$) it h$s bee% b) $ former (- judge is %ot
desir$ble.
LKou c$%%ot level perso%$l $tt$cks like this o% -hief .ustice $%d some of the
other judges*L he s$id respo%di%g to H$tjuIs blog.
1ormer 8igh -ourt judge 6( (odhi s$id the judici$r) should %ot be tre$ted i%
this m$%%er. L/o%It go $rou%d m$lig%i%g it bec$use )ou $re goi%g to be
u%dermi%i%g the effic$c) of the i%stitutio%. .udici$r) c$%%ot be c$lled
corrupt like th$t.L
(e%ior $dvoc$te #$jeed #emo% s$id the f$ith of the commo% m$% i%
judici$r) is sh$ki%g. LAe should work together %ot o%l) to sust$i% but $lso
e%h$%ce the f$ith of the people i% the s)stem*L he s$id.
H$tju rec$lled th$t the judge i% @uestio% w$s co%se@ue%tl) tr$%sferred to $
sm$ll 8igh -ourt* $%d l$ter impe$chme%t proceedi%gs were brought $g$i%st
him i% 9$rli$me%t* which l$psed whe% he resig%ed.
L(o .ustice H$p$di$Is cl$im th$t he did %ot bri%g $%) corrupt judge to the
(upreme -ourt* h$s to be @u$lified b) $t le$st o%e i%st$%ce where he For
r$ther the collegium of which he w$s $ memberG $lmost succeeded*L H$tju
s$id.
8e further $dded th$t eve% though he h$d i%formed .ustice H$p$di$ $bout
th$t LjudgeIs reput$tio%L* %either the collegium* %or .ustice 3$l$krish%$%
ever co%sulted him o% the m$tter.
:his w$s obviousl) do%e b) .ustice 3$l$krish%$% Lk%owi%g th$t if co%sulted &
would give $% $dverse report. 3ut wh) did .ustice H$p$di$ %ot tell .ustice
3$l$krish%$% to co%sult me<*L he $dded.
H$tju s$id th$t he h$d l$ter remi%ded .ustice H$p$di$ th$t he h$d i%formed
him $bout the Lb$d reput$tio%L of th$t judge* but %o heed w$s p$id to his
words. & s$id th$t the (upreme -ourt could h$ve bee% s$ved so much
emb$rr$ssme%t if m) $dvice h$d bee% sought* H$tju wrote.
L.ustice H$p$di$ $dmitted th$t & h$d i%formed him* but s$id th$t .ustice
3$l$krish%$%* the -.&* w$s $d$m$%t* $%d so the recomme%d$tio% w$s m$de*L
he $dded.
-orruptio% i% .udici$r)

:here w$s $ .udge i% $ 8igh -ourt who h$d $ ver) b$d reput$tio% $bout his
i%tegrit)* $%d o% this $ccou%t w$s tr$%sferred to !ll$h$b$d 8igh -ourt. '$ter
with p$ss$ge of time he bec$me ver) se%ior $%d !cti%g -hief .ustice of
!ll$h$b$d 8igh -ourt.

(ome people st$rted dem$%di%g th$t he be m$de -hief .ustice of some 8igh
-ourt* $%d l$ter brought to the (upreme -ourt.

:he the% -hief .ustice of &%di$* .ustice H$p$di$* h$d received sever$l
compl$i%ts $bout this .udge th$t eve% $t !ll$h$b$d he w$s i%dulgi%g i%
corruptio%*$%d .ustice H$p$di$ re@uested me to fi%d out the true f$cts
$bout th$t .udge F & w$s the% $ .udge of the (upreme -ourtG.

!t th$t time & h$d to go to !ll$h$b$d* m) home tow% for $tte%di%g $
fu%ctio%* $%d while there & co%t$cted some l$w)ers & k%ew* $%d got + mobile
%umbers of the $ge%ts of this .udge through whom he w$s t$ki%g mo%e). B%
retur%i%g to /elhi & g$ve these + mobile %umbers to .ustice H$p$di$* $%d
suggested th$t he get these %umbers t$pped through i%tellige%ce $ge%cies.

!bout 2 mo%ths there$fter .ustice H$p$di$ told me th$t he h$d do%e $s &
h$d suggested* $%d the co%vers$tio%s t$pped reve$led the corruptio% of this
.udge.

!fter this* .ustice H$p$di$ should h$ve c$lled this .udge to /elhi $%d $sked
for his resig%$tio%* f$ili%g which he would refer the m$tter to 9$rli$me%t for
impe$chme%t* but he did %o such thi%g*Fthough he did %ot $llow the .udge
to become -hief .ustice of $%) 8igh -ourt or $ (upreme -ourt .udgeG

#ost -hief .ustices of &%di$ $re reluct$%t to e;pose corruptio% i% the
judici$r) thi%ki%g th$t this will def$me the judici$r)* $%d so the) prefer to
bur) corruptio% u%der the c$rpet* %ot re$liEi%g th$t the bulge u%der the
c$rpet will show.

(ome thi%k th$t e;posi%g corruptio% def$mes the judici$r). #) repl) to such
people is : /oes corruptio% b) .udges def$me the judici$r)* or does e;posi%g
such corruptio% def$me it <

& m$) give $%other e;$mple. Ahe% & w$s !cti%g -hief .ustice of !ll$h$b$d
8igh -ourt & we%t to /elhi $%d met .ustice '$hoti* the the% -hief .ustice of
i%di$* $%d g$ve him $ chit co%t$i%i%g %$mes of 5 judges of !ll$h$b$d 8igh
-ourt who were doi%g shocki%g thi%gs. .ustice '$hoti $sked me wh$t should
be do%e < & replied th$t if he permitted* & would solve the problem i% 2,
hours. 8e $sked* how <

& replied th$t & w$s goi%g b$ck to !ll$h$b$d b) the %ight tr$i%* $%d o%
re$chi%g there would c$ll the 6egistr$r 7e%er$l $%d tell him to telepho%e
these 5 .udges* $%d tell them th$t the -hief .ustice h$d i%structed th$t the)
would %ot be $llowed e%tr) i%to the 8igh -ourt premises. 9olice w$s bei%g
posted $t the g$te of the 8igh -ourt with i%structio% from me th$t these
judges were %ot to be $llowed e%tr). :heir ch$mbers h$d bee% locked* $%d
the) will receive their s$l$r) checks $t home* $%d the) %eed %ot come to
the 8igh -ourt. & did %ot w$%t to see them i%side the 8igh -ourt premises $s
the) h$d disgr$ced the 8igh -ourt.

Ahe% & s$id this .ustice '$hoti s$id L9le$se do %ot do this* bec$use the% the
politici$%s will get $ h$%dle* $%d the% the) will set up $ 5$tio%$l .udici$l
-ommissio%L. & replied th$t si%ce he w$s %ot permitti%g me to do this* i
would %ot* but he m$) t$ke wh$tever $ctio% he thought fit.

'$ter some of the 5 judges whose %$mes & g$ve were tr$%sferred to $%other
8igh -ourt.

3ut is tr$%sfer $ solutio% < (uch corrupt judges should be s$cked* but this is
%ot do%e to I $void def$mi%g the judici$r)I. & $g$i% $sk : does corruptio% b)
.udges def$me the judici$r)* or does e;posi%g such corruptio% def$me it <

& h$ve give% o%l) two i%st$%ces of corruptio% i% this post* but & c$% give
sever$l more.

JUD!s or "rokers of Justice #
justice

()stem *

)<AME 48 98RR&A4 RAAI)4 %&'(E) 85 IN'IA

walior additional 8udge says she was seGually harassed Dy 7) 8udge9
Fuits

!% $dditio%$l district $%d sessio%s judge i% 7w$lior* who w$s he$di%g the
Jish$k$ committee $g$i%st se;u$l h$r$ssme%t* could %ot s$ve herself from
the pr)i%g e)es of $ #$dh)$ 9r$desh high court judge $%d h$d to resig% from
judici$l service to protect her Ldig%it)* wom$%hood $%d self-esteemL.
!fter pr$ctici%g l$w for 15 )e$rs i% /elhi courts* she p$ssed the #9 8igher
.udici$l (ervice e;$m $%d w$s posted i% 7w$lior o% !ugust 1* 2011. !fter
tr$i%i%g u%der .ustice / H 9$liw$l* she w$s posted $s $dditio%$l district $%d
sessio%s judge i% 7w$lior i% Bctober 2012.
&% !pril 201+* she w$s $ppoi%ted ch$irperso% of /istrict Jish$k$ -ommittee.
8er $%%u$l co%fide%ti$l report of .$%u$r) 201, termed her work Le;celle%t
$%d outst$%di%gL. 3ut th$t w$s %ot e%ough. :he $dmi%istr$tive judge from
7w$lior be%ch of #$dh)$ 9r$desh 8- kept pesteri%g her to visit him i% his
bu%g$low $lo%e* she $lleged.
&% her compl$i%t to -hief .ustice of &%di$ 6 # 'odh$ $%d (upreme -ourt
judges .ustices 8 ' /$ttu* : ( :h$kur* !%il 6 /$ve* /ip$k #isr$ $%d !ru%
#isr$* $s well $s the #9 8- chief justice* she s$id the $dmi%istr$tive judge
se%t her $ mess$ge through the district registr$r to Lperform d$%ce o% $%
item so%gL $t $ fu%ctio% i% his reside%ce. (he $voided the fu%ctio% o% the
prete;t of her d$ughterIs birthd$).
6espo%di%g to her compl$i%t* .ustice 'odh$ s$id* L:his is the o%l) professio%
where we refer to our colle$gues $s brothers $%d sisters. :his is
u%fortu%$te. & will t$ke $ppropri$te $ctio% $fter the compl$i%t is pl$ced
before me.L
:he ver) %e;t d$) of se%di%g $ mess$ge to d$%ce i% his reside%ce* the
$dmi%istr$tive judge told her th$t Lhe missed the opportu%it) of viewi%g $
se;) $%d be$utiful figure d$%ci%g o% the floor $%d th$t he is desper$te to
see the s$meL* she $lleged.
:he judge got $%gr) whe% she did %ot p$) heed to his Lv$rious $dv$%ces $%d
m$licious $spir$tio%sL. (he w$s subjected to i%te%se scruti%) b) the
$dmi%istr$tive judge. 8e got more $git$ted whe% %o f$ult w$s fou%d* she
s$id.
L& st$rted comme%ci%g court $t 10.+0 $m i%ste$d of 11 $m $%d e;te%ded the
worki%g hours i% the eve%i%g b) o%e hour to pm*L she s$id but compl$i%ed
th$t this did %ot $ppe$se the $dmi%istr$tive judge* who co%ti%ued to h$r$ss
her.
:ired of h$r$ssme%t* she $lo%g with her husb$%d o% .u%e 22 we%t to meet
the $dmi%istr$tive judge* who w$s Lirrit$tedL to fi%d her with her husb$%d
$%d $sked her to meet him $fter 15 d$)s. 3ut eve% before 15 d$)s could
h$ve el$psed* she w$s served with $ tr$%sfer order.
&% her compl$i%t* she s$id* L:he $dmi%istr$tive judge* $lo%g with district
judge $%d district judge Fi%spectio%G* possibl) m$de $ f$lse* frivolous*
b$seless $%d m$licious reporti%g to the chief justice of #9 $%d got me
tr$%sferred o% .ul) 8* i% the mid-$c$demic sessio% of m) d$ughters to $
remote pl$ce (idhi b) overruli%g the tr$%sfer polic) of #9 8-.L
8er represe%t$tio% for eight-mo%th e;te%sio% to $llow her d$ughters
complete the $c$demic sessio% w$s rejected. 'eft with %o choice* she c$lled
o% the $dmi%istr$tive judge $%d ple$ded $g$i%st the $brupt tr$%sfer s$)i%g
it would $ffect the studies of her child who w$s i% -l$ss 12.
&% her compl$i%t* she s$id* L#ocki%gl)* he replied th$t & f$ced this mid-
$c$demic sessio% tr$%sfer to (idhi for %ot fulfilli%g his $spir$tio%s $%d for
%ot visiti%g his bu%g$low $lo%e eve% o%ce $%d he $lso thre$te%ed me th$t
%ow he will spoil m) c$reer completel) $%d m$ke sure th$t & f$ce rui%ous
prospects $ll m) life.L
(he cl$imed the 8- chief justice decli%ed to meet her whe% she w$%ted to
$pprise him of the situ$tio%. L& w$s left with %o optio% but to resig%* so* &
resig%ed o% .ul) 15 i% compelli%g* humili$ti%g $%d disgr$ceful circumst$%ces
to s$ve m) dig%it)* wom$%hood* self-esteem $%d c$reer of m) d$ughter.L
(eeki%g justice from the -.&* she s$id* LB%l) bec$use the perpetr$tor is $s
powerful $s $% I$dmi%istr$tive judgeI th$t he c$% c$st $% evil e)e o% me* $%d
& do %ot eve% get $ he$ri%g. Ah$t s)stem $re we followi%g $%d le$di%g this
democr$c) to< &f this is how $ mother* sister $%d wife c$% be tre$ted* who is
herself %o less th$% $ judici$l officer dut)-bou%d to protect societ) $%d l$w*
wh$t co%stitutio%$l go$ls $re we servi%g<L

4adhya %radesh seGual assault on ?oman Judge

-$ses of h$r$ssme%t $t the workpl$ce h$ve become $% ever)d$) $ff$ir. 3ut
this time* the victim is %ot $ regul$r office goer. (he is $% !dditio%$l /istrict
$%d (essio%s -ourt .udge i% #$dh)$ 9r$desh. :he wom$% judge i%cide%t$ll)
w$s $lso he$di%g the Jish$k$ -ommittee $g$i%st se;u$l h$r$ssme%t* but
could %ot s$ve herself from the s%oopi%g e)es of $ #$dh)$ 9r$desh 8igh
-ourt .udge $%d h$d to give up her service to protect her dig%it) $%d self-
esteem.
!s if this w$s %ot e%ough* the wom$% .udge w$s $sked to d$%ce to $
3oll)wood item so%g b) her h$r$sser. !ccordi%g to reports* the
$dmi%istr$tive judge $sked her to >perform d$%ce o% $% item so%g? $t $
fu%ctio% $t his home $%d i%flue%ced her tr$%sfer to $ remote loc$tio%
despite her re@uests. 8owever* she e;cused herself citi%g her d$ughterCs
birthd$).
&% her compl$i%t* she $lleged th$t the 8igh -ourt .udge $lso forced her to
visit his bu%g$low $lo%e* which she %ever did. :he wom$% .udge w$s
tr$%sferred i% the middle of her d$ughterCs -l$ss 12 $c$demic sessio%. Ahe%
she protested* she w$s told this w$s h$ppe%i%g bec$use she did %ot fulfill
his $spir$tio%s. &% her compl$i%t* she s$id* >#ocki%gl)* he replied th$t &
f$ced this mid-$c$demic sessio% tr$%sfer to (idhi for %ot fulfilli%g his
$spir$tio%s $%d for %ot visiti%g his bu%g$low $lo%e eve% o%ce $%d he $lso
thre$te%ed me th$t %ow he will spoil m) c$reer completel) $%d m$ke sure
th$t & f$ce rui%ous prospects $ll m) life.?

(he cl$imed the 8- -hief .ustice decli%ed to meet her whe% she w$%ted to
$pprise him of the situ$tio%. >& w$s left with %o optio% but to resig%. (o &
resig%ed o% .ul) 15 i% compelli%g* humili$ti%g $%d disgr$ceful circumst$%ces
to s$ve m) dig%it)* wom$%hood* self-esteem $%d c$reer of m) d$ughter.?
&% her compli$%t to -hief .ustice of &%di$ 6# 'odh$ $%d (upreme -ourt
judges .ustices 8' /$ttu* :( :h$kur* !%il 6 /$ve* /ip$k #isr$ $%d !ru% #isr$*
$s well $s the #$dh)$ 9r$desh 8- -hief .ustice* she s$id* >B%l) bec$use the
perpetr$tor is $s powerful $s $% M!dmi%istr$tive .udgeC th$t he c$% c$st $%
evil e)e o% me $%d & do %ot eve% get $ he$ri%g. Ah$t s)stem $re we
followi%g $%d le$di%g this democr$c) to< &f this is how $ mother* sister $%d
wife c$% be tre$ted N who is herself %o less th$% $ judici$l officer dut)-
bou%d to protect societ) $%d l$w N wh$t -o%stitutio%$l go$ls $re we
servi%g<?* $ :imes of &%di$ report s$id.
(he further st$tes th$t the $dmi%istr$tive judge* $lo%g with district judge
$%d district judge Fi%spectio%G* possibl) m$de $ f$lse* frivolous* b$seless $%d
m$licious reporti%g to the -hief .ustice of #9 $%d got me tr$%sferred o%
.ul) 8* i% the mid-$c$demic sessio% of m) d$ughters to $ remote pl$ce (idhi
b) overruli%g the tr$%sfer polic) of #9 8-.?
:he :imes of &%di$ report further @uotes .ustice 'odh$ s$)i%g* >:his is the
o%l) professio% where we refer to our colle$gues $s brothers $%d sisters.
:his is u%fortu%$te. & will t$ke $ppropri$te $ctio% $fter the compl$i%t is
pl$ced before me.?
:he victim p$ssed the #9 8igher .udici$l (ervice e;$m $%d w$s posted i%
7w$lior o% !ugust 1* 2011. !fter tr$i%i%g u%der .ustice /H 9$liw$l* she w$s
posted $s $dditio%$l district $%d sessio%s judge i% 7w$lior i% Bctober 2012.
&% !pril 201+* she w$s $ppoi%ted ch$irperso% of /istrict Jish$k$ -ommittee.
8er $%%u$l co%fide%ti$l report of .$%u$r) 201, termed her work >e;celle%t
$%d outst$%di%g?. 3ut th$t w$s %ot e%ough.
&t h$s bee% more th$% $ )e$r si%ce the (e;u$l 8$r$ssme%t of Aome% $t
Aorkpl$ce !ct w$s p$ssed. 3ut it seems th$t the !ct is powerful o%l) o% the
p$per $%d %othi%g more $s sever$l comp$%ies f$il to impleme%t them. :he
v$st m$jorit) of comp$%ies $%d sever$l est$blishme%ts $re still tr)i%g to
figure out wh$t to do. !ccordi%g to the 9ress &%form$tio% 3ure$u of the
7over%me%t of &%di$* >:he !ct will e%sure th$t wome% $re protected $g$i%st
se;u$l h$r$ssme%t $t $ll work pl$ces* be it i% public or priv$te. :his will
co%tribute to re$lis$tio% of their right to ge%der e@u$lit)* life $%d libert)
$%d e@u$lit) i% worki%g co%ditio%s ever)where. :he se%se of securit) $t the
workpl$ce will improve wome%Cs p$rticip$tio% i% work* resulti%g i% their
eco%omic empowerme%t $%d i%clusive growth.?
8owever* it is $% iro%) th$t this c$se comes $t $ time whe% the -e%tr$l
7over%me%t h$s directed $ll the (t$te 7over%me%ts to provide ++ per ce%t
reserv$tio% for wome% i% their police forces to effectivel) de$l with c$ses of
se;u$l viole%ce $%d crime $g$i%st wome%. B%l) time will tell if this will
become $ re$lit) soo% or %ot.

'otice to )J0 Justice ( 4 &odha
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/%otice-to-cji-justice-r-m-
lodh$ 9

0ndian police Qgang-rape woman after she fails to pay DriDeQ
Aom$% s$)s she w$s $tt$cked $t $ police st$tio% i% 2tt$r 9r$desh $fter goi%g
there to seek her husb$%dIs rele$se

!% &%di$% wom$% h$s s$id she w$s g$%g-r$ped b) four officers $t $ police
st$tio%* the l$test i% $ stri%g of se; $tt$cks i% the st$te of 2tt$r 9r$desh.
:he wom$% s$id she w$s $tt$cked whe% she we%t to the st$tio% over%ight o%
#o%d$) i% the 8$mirpur district to seek her husb$%dIs rele$se.
L!t 11.+0pm whe% there w$s %o o%e i% the room the sub-i%spector took me
to his room $%d r$ped me i%side the police st$tio%*L the wom$% told -55-
&35.
(he filed $ compl$i%t with $ se%ior officer o% Aed%esd$) over the $tt$ck*
which $llegedl) occurred whe% she refused to p$) $ bribe to secure the
rele$se of her husb$%d. Jire%dr$ Hum$r (hekh$r* $ police offici$l from
8$mirpur* s$id: L:he procedure will be followed. :he victim h$s filed $
compl$i%t $%d the guilt) will be $rrested soo%.L
(ub-i%spector 3$lbir (i%gh s$id $ crimi%$l c$se h$d bee% lodged $g$i%st four
officers from the st$tio%.
:he c$se is the l$test i% $ stri%g of r$pes $%d murders i% 2tt$r
9r$desh* &%di$Is most populous st$te* where the chief mi%ister* !khilesh
K$d$v* is u%der growi%g politic$l pressure over his h$%dli%g of l$w $%d order.
'$st mo%th* two girls* $ged 12 $%d 1,* were g$%g-r$ped $%d l)%ched i% their
vill$ge. :he) were $tt$cked $fter goi%g i%to $ field to relieve themselves $t
%ight bec$use the) did %ot h$ve $ l$v$tor) $t home.
:heir f$milies refused to cut the bodies dow% from the tree for hours i%
protest* s$)i%g police h$d f$iled to t$ke $ctio% $g$i%st the $tt$ckers
bec$use the girls were from $ low c$ste.
:he prime mi%ister* 5$re%dr$ #odi* * i% his first comme%ts o% the issue si%ce
the h$%gi%g of the girls sp$rked public outr$ge* o% Aed%esd$) urged $ll
politici$%s to work together to protect wome%. #odi w$r%ed politici$%s
$g$i%st Lpoliticisi%g r$peL* s$)i%g the) were Lpl$)i%g with the dig%it) of
wome%L i% his first speech to p$rli$me%t si%ce sweepi%g to power $t l$st
mo%thIs electio%.
&%di$ brought i% tougher l$ws l$st )e$r $g$i%st se;u$l offe%ders $fter the
f$t$l g$%g-r$pe of $ stude%t i% 5ew /elhi i% /ecember 2012* but the) h$ve
f$iled to stem the tide of viole%ce $g$i%st wome%.
!lso o% Aed%esd$)* $ ,5-)e$r-old wom$% w$s fou%d h$%gi%g from $ tree i%
2tt$r 9r$desh. 8er f$mil) s$id she h$d bee% r$ped $%d murdered. ! police
officer s$id five me% were bei%g @uestio%ed over the i%cide%t* which
occurred sever$l kilometres from her home i% 3$hr$ich district. L:he) Oher
husb$%d $%d so%P h$ve $lleged th$t the wom$%* before bei%g stru%g up from
the tree* w$s r$ped $%d murdered b) these me%*L the district
superi%te%de%t 8$pp) 7upt$% told !19.

($%0S/ Judges & (apist %olice - 'o punishment #
?hen a Judge 7imself )ommits )rime 9 ?hen a %O&0)! 7imself
roDs 9 4urders L.

&% the r$pe c$se of #s.5irbh$)$ committed l$st )e$r i% 5ew /elhi * $ll the
$ccussed were from lower middle cl$ss b$ckgrou%d. (o * the whole societ) *
medi$ * police r$ised voiced $g$i%st them $%d the guilt) were rightl)
prosecuted.
3ut t$ke the rece%t c$se of (upreme -ourt .udges $ccussed of se;u$l
offe%ces #r. ! . (. 7!572'K * #r. (A!:8!5:06 H2#!6 or /79 (9( 6$thore
i%volved i% 6uchik$ c$se or some some #i%isters * #'!s * #9s* the medi$ *
societ) * police 4 9rosecuti%g judges $re bi$sed tow$rds the $ccussed.
3ec$use the $ccussed $re rich 4 might) * belo%g to ruli%g elite cl$ss.

$re not the laws & itHs enforcements fair 9 eFuitaDle 9 8ust and same for
one & all #
/he puDlic serEants & the goEernment must De role models in law aDiding
acts 9 for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is
eGcusaDle & can De corrected Dy the teacher. if the teacher himself
makes a mistake 9 all his students will do the same mistake. if a thief
steals 9 he can De caught 9 legally punished & reformed . if a police
himself commits crime 9 many thieEes go scot-free under his patronage.
prosecuted & 8ustice can De sought Dy the aggrieEed.

8ust think 9 if a 8udge himself that too apeG court of the land itself
commits crime - Eiolations of (/0 $ct 9 constitutional rights & human
rights of puDlic and oDstructs the puDlic from performing their
constitutional fundamental duties 9 what happens #

it giEes a Dooster dose to the rich & mighty 9 those in power 9 criminals in
puDlic serEice to commit more crimes. that is eGactly what is happening
in india. the educated puDlic must raise to the occasion & peacefully 9
democratically must oppose this criminaliOation of 8udiciary 9 puDlic
serEice. then alone 9 we can Duild a ($4 ($JA$ OF 4$7$/4$ $'D70QS
D(!$4.

& h$ve show% i% the followi%g $tt$chme%t how justice is bought *
purch$sed * m$%ipul$ted i% &5/&! with $ctu$l c$ses. .ust see the
rece%t e;$mples of supreme court judges i%volved i% se;u$l $ss$ult
c$se 4 6BB(: 6esort #)sore (e; sc$%d$l i%volvi%g judges * if $%)
ordi%$r) fellow h$d committed the s$me crimes he would h$ve bee%
h$uled over the co$l fire. .ust t$ke $%other rece%t e;$mple of 9riso%er
#ovie $ctor s$%j$) dutt * :!/! provisio%s were diluted b) the judge to
f$vour him $%d %ow he is getti%g p$role week $fter week while the
ordi%$r) co%victs %ever get $ si%gle p$role throught their se%te%ce. Ah$t
3rilli$%t .udges * wh$t brilli$%t police sirji.

!ditorial 6 7ang (apist Judges to &amp %osts - JUD!S & S!@U$&
)(04!S

$t the outset 9 we eGpress our whole hearted respects to the honest few
puDlic serEants
in puDlic serEice including 8udiciary & %olice. 7oweEer9 the corrupt in
puDlic serEice donHt deserEe
respect as indiEiduals B as they are parasites in our legal system. Still we
respect the
chairs they occupy Dut not the corrupt indiEiduals.
$ll the following articles < issues 9 past cases of seGual assaults on women
Dy 8udges ,hushed up #. 9 whole articles puDlished in the weDlinks
mentioned
Delow forms part of this appeal. /he term MJUD!N mentioned throught
includes all puDlic
serEants discharging 8udicial functions right from taluk magistrates 9
Fuasi-8udicial
sale. 0t is a S7$4!.
/he persons who raise their Eoice seeking 8ustice are silenced in many
ways. /he
criminal neGus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . 0f
anything untoward
happens to me or to my family memDers 9 my dependents 9 7onouraDle
)hief Justice of
0ndia together with 8urisdictional police officer will De responsiDle for it.
honouraDle supreme court
of 0ndia & other goEernment authorities9 in apprehending criminals
including corrupt
8udges & police. 7erewith 9 we once again appeal to the honouraDle
supreme court of
0ndia 9 to consider this as a %0& $ppeal in puDlic interest.
)onsider the cases of seGual assault Dy JUD!S 9 %O&0)! on women . /he
JUD!S
haEe legal immunity with respect to their official duties9 official actions
Dut not their
indiEidual actions amounting to )(04!S.
/he puDlic serEants & the goEernment must De role models in law aDiding
acts 9 for others
to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is eGcusaDle & can De
corrected Dy
the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake 9 all his students will
do the same
mistake. if a thief steals 9 he can De caught 9 legally punished & reformed
. if a police
eEen if a police 9
puDlic serEant commits a crime 9 he can De legally prosecuted & 8ustice
can De sought Dy
the aggrieEed. 8ust think 9 if a 8udge himself that too of apeG court of the
land itself
commits crime - Eiolations of (/0 $ct 9 constitutional rights & human
rights of puDlic and
duties 9 what
happens # it giEes a Dooster dose to the rich & mighty 9 those in power 9
criminals in
puDlic serEice to committ more crimes. that is eGactly what is
happenning in india. the
educated puDlic must raise to the occassion & peacefully 9 democratically
must oppose
this criminalisation of 8udiciary 9 puDlic serEice. then alone 9 we can
Duild a ($4 ($JA$ OF 4$7$/4$ $'D70QS D(!$4.

7ereDy 9 we reFuest the honouraDle court to reopen all hushed up old
cases of seGual assault inEolEing 8udges and to punish the guilty 8udges.

Read Is 9<IE5 %&)4I9E 85 IN'IA a#o1e 6A! BBB
*tt+s://sites.google.co"/site/sose1oice,orjustice/c*ie,-justice-a#o1e-
la/ 2

Is 9<IE5 %&)4I9E 85 IN'IA a#o1e 6A! BBB
*tt+s://sites.google.co"/site/sose1oice,orjustice/c*ie,-justice-a#o1e-
la/ 2

&aw student seGually harassed Dy eG-Supreme )ourt 8udge6 case is not
uniFue9 Dut speaking out is nearly impossiDle

http6<<www.legallyindia.com<12*-****;2++<0nterEiews<seGual-
harassment-supreme-court-is-common 9

<AN( RAAI)4 98RR&A4 %&'(E)
*tt+s://sites.google.co"/site/eclarioo,dalit/*ag-ra+ist-corru+t-judges

'othing Dut the truth
"y 0ndira Jaising
! midst the risi%g di% of the dem$%d for de$th pe%$lt) for r$pists comes the
%ews th$t three judges of the H$r%$t$k$ 8igh -ourt h$ve bee% i%volved i%
wh$t h$s come to be described $s $ Ise; sc$%d$lI o% the outskirts of #)sore
$t $ pl$ce c$lled 6oost 6esorts.
Bur $tte%tio% is %ow directed to those who dispe%se justice r$ther th$%
those who k%ock $t the doors of justice. &% both c$ses* we $re t$lki%g $bout
the use $%d $buse of wome% N those who $re victims of se;u$l $buse* $%d
those who $re used $s se;u$l objects* willi%gl) or u%willi%gl).
!fter the reports i% loc$l %ewsp$pers th$t three high court judges were
fou%d with wome% $t $ resort* there w$s the usu$l crop of de%i$ls. !lthough
the #)sore police were c$lled i% to settle $ br$wl* o% bei%g told th$t the
perso%s i% @uestio% were judges the) s$id th$t the) he$rd %o evil $%d s$w %o
evil.
!%d ever)o%e thought the m$tter e%ded there.
!ttempts to get the %$mes of the judges or of the wome% i% @uestio% drew $
bl$%k. :he b$r $ssoci$tio% $lso drew $ bl$%k $s most people s$id* L/o%It
@uote meQ butQL
B% 5ovember +0* the 3$%g$lore editio% of :he :imes of &%di$ published $
fro%t-p$ge stor) givi%g the %$mes $%d photogr$phs of the three judges $%d
co%firmi%g th$t the &%tellige%ce 3ure$u h$d do%e $% i%vestig$tio% $%d come
to the co%clusio% th$t the i%cide%t h$d i%deed occurred. :here were still %o
det$ils of the i%cide%t* though it w$s st$ted th$t the report h$s bee% give%
to the chief justice of &%di$.
:here were reports o% the s$me d$) th$t the H$r%$t$k$ 8igh -ourt chief
justice h$d sought the tr$%sfer of the three judges to 9$t%$* .$mmu $%d
H$shmir $%d 7uw$h$ti. !pp$re%tl)* the chief justice h$s $greed to this
re@uest $%d the tr$%sfer orders h$ve bee% issued.
:he% c$me the %ews th$t the chief justice of &%di$ h$s set up $ committee
of i%@uir) u%der the Ii%-houseI procedure co%sisti%g of the chief justice of
the !%dhr$ 9r$desh 8igh -ourt* the chief justice of the #$dr$s 8igh -ourt
$%d the chief justice of the 9$t%$ 8igh -ourt.
:here were still %o det$ils i% the press $bout the $ctu$l i%cide%t $%d the
e%tire episode co%ti%ued to be referred to $s $ Ise; sc$%d$lI.
Ah$t is i%teresti%g $bout these reports is %ot wh$t the) reve$l* but wh$t
the) co%ce$l. &t is $ co%spir$c) of sile%ce. &f the i%form$tio% is %ow $v$il$ble
to the chief justice of &%di$* wh) is it %ot bei%g m$de public< /o we* the
public* %ot h$ve the right to i%form$tio%< &ro%ic$ll)* the mor%i%g %ewsp$pers
brought the %ews th$t the 1reedom of &%form$tio% !ct h$s bee% p$ssed.
Ah$t $re the legitim$te limits of the right to freedom of i%form$tio% $%d
the re@uireme%t of keepi%g i%form$tio% $ secret< :his episode would m$ke
$% i%teresti%g c$se stud).
Ah$t e;$ctl) is $t st$ke here< :here is much th$t should co%cer% the %$tio%
$bout the i%cide%t. :his is %ot $ c$se $bout the priv$te mor$lit) of the
judges* be th$t $s it m$)* but $bout the $buse of office th$t the) hold. Ah$t
h$s %ot bee% m$de k%ow% is th$t the three wome% i% @uestio% $re wome%
l$w)ers pr$ctisi%g i% their courts.
Ah$t is $t st$ke here is the pollutio% of the stre$m of justice $t its ver)
source. :here must be cou%tless c$ses i% which these wome% $ppe$red
before these ver) judges d$) i% $%d d$) out of their routi%e pr$ctice. -$%
o%e ho%estl) s$) th$t i% such $ situ$tio% justice is bei%g do%e Lwithout fe$r
or f$vourL< .udges swe$r o% o$th of $llegi$%ce to Lbe$r true f$ithL to the
-o%stitutio% $%d do justice Lwithout fe$r or f$vourL. 8ow well h$ve these
judges ho%oured this o$th<
Ah$t is $t st$ke here is the c)%ic$l use of wome% $s se;u$l commodities.
:he usu$l justific$tio%s h$ve $lre$d) begu% m$ki%g the rou%ds. &f the wome%
h$ve %ot compl$i%ed* wh$t objectio% c$% $%)o%e else h$ve* it is $sked.
Ah$t is lost sight of is the f$ct th$t the judges $re i% $ positio% of
domi%$%ce vis-R-vis the wome%* i% $ positio% to do f$vours th$t pert$i% to
their office.
Ah$t is $t st$ke here is the c)%ic$l use of public office* the se$t of justice*
for perso%$l pett) g$i%. &t is irrelev$%t whether the wome% co%se%ted or
%ot. :he usu$l bl$me g$me will %ow begi% N bl$mi%g the victim r$ther th$%
the perpetr$torS the usu$l loose t$lk $bout the ch$r$cter of the wom$% i%
@uestio%S the usu$l $ttempt to cover up b) diverti%g $tte%tio% from the
$ctu$l i%cide%t to the motives of those who brought the i%cide%t to light.
Ah$t is $t st$ke here is the perceptio% of wome% $s se;u$l commodities b)
those who $re respo%sible for sitti%g i% judgme%t over c$ses brought for $%d
o% beh$lf of wome%.
:he issues $t st$ke here co%cer% o%e h$lf of &%di$%s. Aith wh$t f$ith c$%
&%di$% wome% $ppro$ch the courts dem$%di%g the right to e@u$lit)* the right
to be free from se;u$l h$r$ssme%t or r$pe $%d the right to live with dig%it)*
if the persecutio% of judges who sit i% judgme%t over them is %o%-
%egoti$ble<
&% the circumst$%ces* the suggested solutio% is worse th$% the offe%ce N to
tr$%sfer them to 9$t%$* 7uw$h$ti $%d .$mmu $%d H$shmir. Ah) these
p$rticul$r cities< !re the) %ot $% i%tegr$l p$rt of the cou%tr)* or $re the)
mere isl$%ds withi% the cou%tr) th$t $re co%sidered Ipu%ishme%t posti%gsI
where people $re se%t $ l$ Icrossi%g H$l$ 9$%iI of the old d$)s< :o the credit
of the 7uw$h$ti 3$r !ssoci$tio%* it protested $g$i%st the proposed tr$%sfer.
:he o%l) dece%t thi%g to do is for the chief justice of &%di$ to disclose full
det$ils of the i%cide%t so th$t rumour-mo%geri%g comes to $% e%d. :his
would be i% the best i%terest of the judici$r) itself.
!s thi%gs st$%d* the rumours $re m$ki%g the rou%ds th$t there were more
th$% three judges i%volved* th$t the wome% were professio%$l c$ll girls*
m$%) of which $re b$seless. Ae* the people* h$ve the right to k%ow. :he
co%spir$c) of sile%ce must be broke%.
:he judges i% @uestio% must %either be $ssig%ed $%) judici$l fu%ctio%s
pe%di%g $% i%@uir) %or be tr$%sferred to sit i% judgme%t over others. :wo of
the judges $re st$ted to be $dditio%$l judges. :he) must %ot be co%firmed.
&f there is prim$ f$cie evide%ce $g$i%st the o%e rem$i%i%g judge* the chief
justice must recomme%d his impe$chme%t.
&t is time for $ll co%cer%ed b$r $ssoci$tio%s* b$r cou%cils $%d other m$le-
domi%$ted bodies of leg$l professio%$ls to $ct $%d e%sure th$t there is %o
cover-up. :here is little poi%t i% showi%g s)mp$th) to wome% i% judgme%ts
$%d i% semi%$r rooms* or i% recomme%di%g the de$th pe%$lt) for r$pe if we
c$%%ot de$l with the me% who dispe%se justice.
:here $re co%tempt of court petitio%s pe%di%g i% the H$r%$t$k$ 8igh -ourt
$g$i%st some of the public$tio%s for disclosi%g det$ils of the i%cide%t. -ivil
societ) $%d wome%Is org$%is$tio%s must dem$%d th$t justice is %ow do%e
whe% it comes to the judges themselves.
:he l$w of co%tempt c$% offer %o solutio% to the crisis of credibilit) i% the
judici$r) th$t this i%cide%t h$s throw% up. B%e positive $spect of the
i%cide%t is th$t it is o%l) $fter the chief justice of the high court issued $
public %otice i%viti%g i%form$tio% th$t he received 20 represe%t$tio%s*
which led to the discover) of the truth.
'et the truth %ow be m$de public.

Judge accused of molesting 1 rape surEiEors in U%

$ sitting 8udicial magistrate seGually assaulted them

29: :wo r$pe victims cl$im th$t $ sitti%g judici$l m$gistr$te se;u$ll)
$ss$ulted them. :he girls
$lleged th$t whe% the) we%t to the m$gistr$teCs ch$mber to give their
st$teme%t* he $llegedl)
m$de them strip $%d molested them.
B%e of the girls is $ mi%or $%d the police h$ve filed $ compl$i%t. :he girls
$lso cl$imed th$t the
judge thre$te%ed them to %ot spe$k of the i%cide%t to $%)o%e.
'$w)ers $%d the ge%er$l public i% 7o%d$ l$u%ched $ protest $g$i%st the
judge.

JUD! S!'D0' O"S)!'! S4S /O ?O4!'

&ucknow /aking cognisance of the allegation against a ciEil Judge ,8unior
diEision. of
"udaun court that he sent oDscene S4Ses to a woman lecturer9 the
(egistrar eneral of
$llahaDad 7igh )ourt today sought a report from the district 8udge into
the matter.
/he ciEil 8udge of unnor suD-diEision court of "udaun S %ramod 5umar
angwarS was
accused of sending oDscene S4Ses from his cellphone to a woman
lecturer of )lassic
)ollege of &aw9 "areilly. $ lecturer of the same college9 ViEek upta9 was
named in the F0(
lodged Dy the Eictim while angwarHs name surfaced in the primary
inEestigation.
(egistrar eneral Dinesh upta said9 M/he district 8udge of "udaun has
Deen asked to
send a detailed report into the allegations. $ppropriate action would De
taken on the Dasis
of the report.N
District Judge Suresh 5umar SriEastaEa said9 M0 haEe asked the "areilly
district police to
send a report aDout the matter. /he report on the Dasis of the police
inFuiry would De sent
to the $llahaDad 7igh )ourt (egistrar eneral.N
M0 am not aware aDout the matter9 as the "areilly police did not intimate
me Defore initiating
the proDe against the ciEil 8udge. /hey should haEe informed me when
they had receiEed
any such complaint9N the 8udge added.
4eanwhile9 "areilly )O 00 (a8 5umar9 who is inEestigating the case9 today
recorded the
statement of the Eictim. M0 haEe collected the call details of the
cellphone used for sending
the S4Ses9 Dut 0 haEe yet to get the address of the person who is
suDscriDer of the S04
card9N he said.
M/he proDe is on to Eerify if the accused in the case were present on the
location recorded
in the call details when the S4Ses were sent. /he details of the findings
of the
inEestigation would De sent to the "udaun district court to seek the
direction9N the )O
added.
$sked if the inEestigation was earlier conducted into the matter9 (a8
5umar said9 M/he S%
,)rime. had initiated proDe into the matter9 Dut 0 am not aware if the
inEestigation had
reached to any conclusion.N
/he woman lecturer had lodged an F0( at the 4ahila police station on
/hursday alleging
she had receiEed oDscene S4Ses on her cellphone inEolEing her colleague
ViEek upta.
/he preliminary inFuiry into the case Dy the police yesterday had found
that the moDile
phone used in the crime Delongs to the ciEil 8udge.

&okayukta6 D) demanded seG from widow

In the midst of a national outrage over former Haryana DGP SPS Rathore
molesting a teenager,
the Karnataka Lokayukta on Saturday made a startling revelation that the
state government was
shielding a top ureau!rat who had demanded se"ual favours from a young
widow#
'ok$)ukt$ .ustice ($%tosh 8egde disclosed th$t the offici$l co%cer%ed* who
w$s the deput)
commissio%er of o%e of the districts whe% he dem$%ded se; from the widow
i% retur% for
disch$rgi%g his duties $s public serv$%t* h$s si%ce bee% promoted to $ se%ior
positio%.
.ustice 8egde* i% the course of $% i%ter$ctio% with jour%$lists $t the /ecc$%
8er$ld office
($turd$) $fter%oo%* s$id the u%%$med widow h$d d$red the deput)
commissio%er $%d
$ppro$ched the 'ok$)ukt$Cs office with $ compl$i%t $g$i%st the officer.
B% e;$mi%$tio% of the compl$i%t* the 'ok$)ukt$ h$d fou%d sufficie%t
grou%ds to recomme%d to
the st$te gover%me%t the suspe%sio% $%d prosecutio% of the /- co%cer%ed.
:he
recomme%d$tio% w$s subse@ue%tl) co%sidered b) the co%cer%ed dep$rtme%t
he$d $s well $s
the chief secret$r) $%d both e%dorsed it.
3ut* $ccordi%g to .ustice 8egde* %o $ctio% w$s i%iti$ted $g$i%st the /- $s
the s$me offici$l who
h$d e%dorsed the recomme%d$tio% subse@ue%tl) fou%d %o b$sis for i%iti$ti%g
dep$rtme%t$l $ctio%
$g$i%st him. &%ste$d* the offici$l cle$red the /-Cs %$me for promotio% i% the
super-sc$le.
9rese%tl)* the offici$l holds $ se%ior positio% i% the gover%me%t.
:he widow* i% her l$te 20s* h$d $ppro$ched the /- with $ represe%t$tio% to
sort out some
problems. 3ut she w$s shocked whe% the /- dem$%ded se;.
.ustice 8egde did %ot ide%tif) the offici$l i% @uestio% or the compl$i%$%t.
5or did he offer to %$me
the district where the offici$l w$s servi%g $s deput) commissio%er. 3ut the
i%cide%t h$s
h$ppe%ed sometime i% the course of l$st three )e$rs $s .ustice 8egde took
over $s the
'ok$)ukt$ i% mid-200.

--year 8ail term for TdirtyH 8udge

$amily !ourt %udge Ramrao Gangaram &hise attempted to get se"ual
favours from a housewife in
'(()
1$mil) court judge 6$mr$o 7$%g$r$m 3hiseCs $ttempts to e;tr$ct se;u$l
f$vours* i% $dditio% to $
bribe* from $ housewife* !lk$ 7$ikw$d N who h$d sought $% i%cre$se i% her
mo%thl)
m$i%te%$%ce $llow$%ce from her estr$%ged husb$%d* i% 1==7 N proved
costl) to him.
9ro%ou%ci%g him guilt) o% both cou%ts* the speci$l court he$ri%g $%ti-
corruptio% bure$u F!-3G
m$tters se%te%ced him to three )e$rs rigorous impriso%me%t $%d $
collective fi%e of 6s55* 000*
o% #o%d$).
!ccordi%g to the 1&6 i% the c$se registered $g$i%st 3hise b) the !-3*
(ur)$k$%t 7$ikw$d h$d
filed for divorce from his wife* !lk$* before the 3$%dr$ f$mil) court. !lk$* $
housewife* i% tur%*
filed $ petitio% seeki%g mutu$l coh$bit$tio% with her husb$%d. :he the%
f$mil) court judge* #eer$
Hh$d$kk$r* directed the husb$%d to p$) her $% i%terim m$i%te%$%ce
$llow$%ce of 6s750 per
mo%th.
(ubse@ue%tl)* i% .$%u$r) 1==7* !lk$ filed $%other $pplic$tio% before the
s$me f$mil) court F%ow
presided over b) 3hiseG seeki%g to i%cre$se the mo%thl) m$i%te%$%ce
$mou%t to 6s+*500. >B%
Bctober 27* 1==7* 3hise issued $% i%terim order* i%cre$si%g the m$i%te%$%ce
$llow$%ce to
6s2*000 to be p$id b) (ur)$k$% to his estr$%ged wife till the dispos$l of the
c$se. &mmedi$tel)
$fter issui%g the order* 3hise $sked !lk$ to meet him $%d g$ve her his
reside%ti$l telepho%e
%umber* $ski%g her to c$ll him whe% the court hours e%ded. 8e told her th$t
he would $sk her
husb$%d to p$) her $ lump sum of 6s2 l$kh i% $dditio% to the mo%thl)
m$i%te%$%ce* provided she
c$lled him up*? the 1&6 st$tes.
Ahe% she c$lled up the judge $t 7 pm the s$me d$)* 3hise told her th$t she
would h$ve to p$)
him $ sum of 6s2*000 i% $dditio% to gr$%ti%g his se;u$l f$vours if she w$%ted
$% order i% her
f$vour. 8e $lso directed her to meet him $t the 8$ji !li bus stop with the
bribe $mou%t the
followi%g eve%i%g.
>!lk$ $ppro$ched the !-3* which sought permissio% from the -hief .ustice
of the 3omb$) 8igh
-ourt before l$)i%g $ tr$p o% the first cl$ss judici$l m$gistr$te F3hiseG. :he
8- while gr$%ti%g the
permissio% desig%$ted $ court offici$l to be$r wit%ess to the eve%ts le$di%g
to the tr$p. !lk$*
u%der video c$mer$ surveill$%ce of !-3 sleuths* $lo%g with the court offici$l
$%d other wome%
wit%esses met 3hise $t 8.+0 pm $t the 8$ji !li bus stop. 3hise took hold of
!lk$Cs wrist $%d whe%
she protested* repe$ted his dem$%ds*? the 1&6 st$tes.
!lk$ w$s the% t$ke% to $ %e$rb) hotel* (h$rd$* where the judge $ccepted
the bribe $mou%t. 3ut
before he could do $%)thi%g else* !-3 sleuths swooped i% $%d $rrested him.

(a8asthan 8udge is indicted for seeking seGual faEours

-hief .ustice of &%di$ 7 3 9$tt$%$ik retires to%ight $%d he does%Ct h$ve
much to write home $bout
o% the u%precede%ted drive he l$u%ched to e%force judici$l $ccou%t$bilit).
!fter the 99(- sc$m fi$sco* reported i% :he &%di$% 0;press tod$)* comes the
c$se of the
6$j$sth$% judge who h$s bee% i%dicted i% $ se; sc$%d$l $%d )et h$s esc$ped
$ctio%Npe%di%g
$%other i%@uir).
B% /ecember 1,* $ three-judge committee set up b) 9$tt$%$ik co%firmed
the MMi%volveme%tCC of
.ustice !ru% #$d$% of the 6$j$sth$% 8igh -ourt i% $ propositio% to $ wom$%
doctor to h$ve se;
with him i% e;ch$%ge for $ judici$l f$vour.
:he committee* he$ded b) the -hief .ustice of the 9u%j$b $%d 8$r)$%$ 8igh
-ourt .ustice 3 H
6o)* submitted its report to 9$tt$%$ik* i%dicti%g #$d$% o% $ compl$i%t m$de
from .odhpur b) the
wom$% co%cer%ed* (u%it$ #$lvi)$.
3ut 9$tt$%$ik h$s %ot $%%ou%ced $%) $ctio% $g$i%st #$d$%. Ahe% co%t$cted
b) :he &%di$%
0;press* 9$tt$%$ik co%firmed th$t the committee h$d i%dicted #$d$% $%d
his MMb$d reput$tio%CC i%
seeki%g se;u$l f$vours i% retur% for judici$l o%es.
8owever* 9$tt$%$ik s$id th$t %o $ctio% w$s bei%g t$ke% si%ce the committee
h$d $lso me%tio%ed
$lleg$tio%s of corruptio% $g$i%st #$d$%. !%d so he h$d ordered $ further
i%@uir) b) the s$me
committee i%to the corruptio% ch$rges.
Ahe% $sked wh$t he did with the i%dictme%t of #$d$% i% the se; sc$%d$l*
9$tt$%$ik s$id* MM:h$t
is o% hold bec$use & could %ot h$ve t$ke% pieceme$l $ctio% $g$i%st himQ.&
$m pr$)i%g to 7od
th$t the fi%$l report will give some t$%gible m$teri$l to t$ke $ctio%.CC
8ighl) pl$ced sources told :he &%di$% 0;press th$t whe% the committee
recorded st$teme%ts l$st
week i% .odhpur of $bout +0 perso%s over four d$)s* it $lso c$me to k%ow of
sever$l $lleg$tio%s
of corruptio% $g$i%st #$d$% $%d $%other judge of the s$me high court. :he
committee put these
o% record $s well.
9$tt$%$ik s$id th$t whe% he summo%ed #$d$% to 5ew /elhi l$st week* he
did %ot r$ise the se;
sc$%d$l issue $%d i%ste$d limited himself to s$)i%g th$t he w$s orderi%g $
further i%@uir) i%to
corruptio% $lleg$tio%s.
&% effect* 9$tt$%$ik h$s %ow p$ssed the 6$j$sth$% buck to his successor
.ustice J 5 Hh$re.
:he gist of #$lvi)$Cs compl$i%t is th$t #$d$% m$de $ se;u$l propositio% to
her i% Bctober
through $ deput) registr$r of the high court* 7ovi%d H$lw$%i* who s$id th$t
the judge would help
her* i% tur%* get out of $ crimi%$l c$se booked $g$i%st her.
Aith this* 9$tt$%$ikCs much-touted i%-house judici$l $ccou%t$bilit) seems to
h$ve hit $ w$ll. :he
first committeeCs report i%to the 99(- sc$m e;o%er$ted o%e judge despite
evide%ce $%d let two
others off with $ mere sl$p o% the wrist. :he third committee is %ow bus)
probi%g the i%volveme%t
of judges i% the #)sore se; sc$m.

/en reasons why criminals in khaki get away
(iddh$rth J$r$d$r$j$%

3ehi%d ever) m$% like (.9.(. 6$thore who $buses his $uthorit) st$%d the
ge%er$ls $%d
footsoldiers who help $%d support him. Ae %eed to t$ke them $ll dow%.
(.9.(. 6$thore* the crimi%$l former top cop of 8$r)$%$* m$) $ppe$r $lo%e
tod$) but we must
%ever forget th$t he w$s $ble to get $w$) with the se;u$l molest$tio% of $
)ou%g child $%d the
illeg$l h$r$ssme%t of her f$mil) for 1= )e$rs bec$use he h$d hu%dreds of
me% who supported
him i% his effort to ev$de justice.
:he f$ct th$t these me% D fellow police officers* bure$ucr$ts* politici$%s*
l$w)ers* judges* school
$dmi%istr$tors D were willi%g to be%d the s)stem to $ccommod$te $ m$%
$ccused of molesti%g $
mi%or spe$ks volumes for the mor$l impoverishme%t of our est$blishme%t
$%d cou%tr). /ece%t
societies shu% those i%volved i% se;u$l offe%ces $g$i%st childre%. 0ve%
crimi%$ls j$iled for
Tordi%$r)I crimes like murder tre$t those servi%g time for molesti%g childre%
$s be)o%d the p$le.
3ut i% &%di$* me% like 6$thore h$ve their uses for their m$sters* so the
s)stem circles its w$go%s
$%d protects them.
:he -3&Is $ppe$l m$) le$d to the e%h$%ceme%t of 6$thoreIs se%te%ce $%d
perh$ps eve% the
sl$ppi%g of $betme%t to suicide ch$rges* si%ce his )ou%g victim killed herself
to put $% e%d to the
crimi%$l i%timid$tio% her f$mil) w$s bei%g subjected to b) 6$thore $%d his
me%. 3ut the s)stemic
rot which the c$se h$s e;posed will %ot be remedied u%less sust$i%ed public
pressure is put o%
9rime #i%ister #$%moh$% (i%gh $%d 2%io% 8ome #i%ister 9. -hid$mb$r$m*
two me% who h$ve
it i% their power to push for simple remedies i% the w$) the &%di$% l$w
e%forceme%t $%d justice
deliver) s)stem works.
1irst* $bolish the %eed for offici$l* i.e. politic$l s$%ctio% to prosecute
bure$ucr$ts* policeme% $%d
securit) forces perso%%el whe% the) $re $ccused of committi%g crimes. :he
origi%$l i%te%t behi%d
this built-i% st$)-out-of-j$il c$rd w$s to protect st$te fu%ctio%$ries from
$cts do%e i% the course of
disch$rgi%g their duties i% good f$ith. (omewhere $lo%g the li%e* this h$s
come to me$%
protecti%g our custodi$%s of l$w $%d order whe% the) murder i%%oce%t
civili$%s Feg. the i%f$mous
9$%ch$lth$% c$se i% H$shmir where the tri$l of $rm) me% i%dicted b) the -3&
for murderi%g five
vill$gers i% 2000 still c$%%ot t$ke pl$ce bec$use the -e%tr$l gover%me%t will
%ot gr$%t
permissio%G* or $ss$ult or molest wome% $%d childre%. 5o civilised*
democr$tic societ) gr$%ts
such impu%it). &t is disgusti%g to see former offici$ls $%d bure$ucr$ts from
8$r)$%$ s$)i%g how
the) h$d w$%ted 6$thore prosecuted but were preve%ted from doi%g so
bec$use of pressure.
(uch offici$ls should either be m$de form$ll) to testif) i% $ crimi%$l c$se
$g$i%st the politici$%s
who so pressured them or the) should themselves be h$uled up for
perverti%g the course of
justice.
(eco%d* stop t$lki%g $bout how m$ki%g the police $%d $rm) $%swer$ble to
the l$w will somehow
demor$lise their mor$le. /oes $%)bod) c$re $bout the mor$le of ordi%$r)
citiEe%s $%) more< Br
the mor$le of upright police $%d $rm) officers* who do %ot thi%k it is right
for their colle$gues to be
$ble to get $w$) with crimi%$l $cts<
:hird* bri%g $% e%d to the cos) rel$tio%ship betwee% the police $%d
politici$%s. 6$thore w$s
protected b) four chief mi%isters of 8$r)$%$. 8e served them $%d the)
served him b) e%suri%g
his u%fettered rise. &t is $bsurd th$t the &%di$% 9olice is still gover%ed b) $
colo%i$l-er$ !ct d$ti%g
b$ck to 181. ! %umber of commissio%s h$ve m$de recomme%d$tio%s for
reformi%g the police
over the )e$rsS but %o gover%me%t or politic$l p$rt) w$%ts to give up its
$bilit) to use $%d misuse
the police for their ow% be%efit
1ourth* e%sure th$t police officers who $buse their $uthorit) $%d e%g$ge i%
m$l$ fide
prosecutio%s $re dismissed from service $%d se%te%ced to j$il for $ lo%g
period of time. #r.
-hid$mb$r$m should use the co%sider$ble resources $t his comm$%d to fi%d
out who were the
policeme% i%volved i% fili%g 11 bogus c$ses $g$i%st the tee%$ged brother of
the )ou%g girl
6$thore molested. 8e should the% m$ke sure crimi%$l proceedi%gs $re
i%iti$ted $g$i%st $ll of
them. :he mess$ge must go out to ever) policem$% i% the cou%tr): &f )ou
$buse the l$w $t the
behest of $ superior* )ou will suffer leg$l co%se@ue%ces.
1ifth* e%sure th$t crimi%$l ch$rges $g$i%st l$w e%forceme%t perso%%el $re
f$st-tr$cked $s $
m$tter of routi%e so th$t $ powerful defe%d$%t is %ot $ble to use his positio%
to del$) proceedi%gs
the w$) 6$thore did for )e$rs o% e%d. :he destructio% or dis$ppe$r$%ce of
m$teri$l evide%ce i%
such c$ses must be tre$ted $s $ gr$ve offe%ce with strict crimi%$l li$bilit)
imposed o% the
i%dividu$l respo%sible for bre$ki%g the ch$i% of custod).
(i;th* empower the 5$tio%$l 8um$% 6ights -ommissio% with teeth so th$t
police dep$rtme%ts
$%d st$te gover%me%ts c$%%ot brush $side their orders $s h$ppe%ed i% the
6$thore c$se. :his
would $lso re@uire $ppoi%ti%g to the 586- wome% $%d me% who h$ve $
prove% record of
defe%di%g hum$% rights i% their professio%$l life* somethi%g th$t is do%e
tod$) o%l) i% the bre$ch.
:he $ttitude of the #$%moh$% (i%gh gover%me%t to this commissio% $%d
others like the 5$tio%$l
-ommissio% for Aome% F5-AG $%d 5$tio%$l -ommissio% for #i%orities is
shocki%g. J$c$%cies
$re %ot filled for mo%ths o% e%d.
(eve%th* e%sure the e$rl) e%$ctme%t of pe%di%g legisl$tio% bro$de%i%g the
$mbit of se;u$l
crimes* i%cludi%g se;u$l crimes $g$i%st childre%. 3etwee% r$pe* defi%ed $s
forced pe%etr$tive
se;* $%d the v$gue* Jictori$%-er$ crime of Toutr$gi%g the modest) of $
wom$%I* the &%di$% 9e%$l
-ode recog%ises %o other form of se;u$l viole%ce. !s $ result* $ll forms of
se;u$l molest$tio%
$%d $ss$ult short of r$pe $ttr$ct f$irl) le%ie%t pu%ishme%t* of the ki%d
6$thore got. &% his c$se* the
judge did %ot eve% h$%d dow% the m$;imum se%te%ce* citi%g co%cer%s for
the crimi%$lIs $ge.
($dl)* he did %ot t$ke i%to $ccou%t the $ge of the victim $%d %either does
the &9-* which f$ils to
disti%guish betwee% Toutr$gi%g the modest)I of $% $dult wom$% $%d $ )ou%g
child.
! dr$ft l$w ch$%gi%g these provisio%s $%d bri%gi%g &%di$ i%to li%e with the
rest of the moder%
world h$s bee% pe%di%g with the 5-A $%d '$w #i%istr) for )e$rs. 9erh$ps
the gover%me%t m$)
%ow be sh$med i%to pushi%g it through 9$rli$me%t $t the e$rliest.
0ighth* t$ke steps to i%troduce $ s)stem of protectio% of wit%esses $%d
compl$i%$%ts. :he f$te
th$t the f$mil) of 6$thoreIs )ou%g victim h$d to e%dure is test$me%t to the
f$ct th$t people who
seek justice i% &%di$ do so $t their ow% peril.
5i%th* e%sure th$t robust i%terrog$tio% tech%i@ues like %$rco-$%$l)sis* which
$re routi%el) used
$g$i%st other $lleged crimi%$ls* $re $lso emplo)ed $g$i%st police officers
$ccused of crimes.
:e%th* the medi$ $%d the higher judici$r) must $lso tur% the light i%w$rd
$%d $sk themselves
whether the) were $lso derelict i% their dut). :he 6$thore c$se did %ot
$ttr$ct the ki%d of co%st$%t
medi$ $tte%tio% it deserved* %or do other c$ses i%volvi%g servi%g police
officers $ccused of
crimes $g$i%st wome%* workers* pe$s$%ts $%d mi%orities. !s for the upper
courts* their record is
too p$tch) to i%spire co%fide%ce. &t w$s* $fter $ll* the high court which
chose to disreg$rd the
-3&Is re@uest for i%cludi%g $betme%t to suicide ch$rges.
He)words: (iddh$rth J$r$d$r$j$%* (.9.(. 6$thore* crimi%$ls* kh$ki* former
/79 of
8$r)$%$* custodi$%s* se;u$l viole%ce* 586-

%orDandar 8udge accused of dowry harassment

! compl$i%t h$s bee% filed $g$i%st /istrict $%d (essio%s judge of 9orb$%d$r
for $llegedl)
h$r$ssi%g his d$ughter-i%-l$w for dowr)* police s$id here o% (u%d$).
/$rsh$%$ /$ve* $ %$tive of !mreli* h$s filed $ compl$i%t $g$i%st her husb$%d
Hi%%$r* f$ther-i%l$w
$%d district judge !rvi%d /$ve* mother-i%-l$w 9r$tibh$ $%d brother-i%-l$w
9r$sh$%t* the
police $dded.
/$rsh$%$ m$rried Hi%%$r two )e$rs $go. 8er compl$i%t s$)s th$t she w$s
h$r$ssed from the
begi%%i%g* $%d w$s eve% be$te% up b) the husb$%d $%d i%-l$ws* who were
dem$%di%g 6s 10
l$kh $s dowr).
(he h$s $lso $lleged th$t she w$s throw% out of the house $ few mo%ths
b$ck* $%d her husb$%d
is %ow seeki%g divorce* the police s$id.
!mreli (uperi%te%de%t of 9olice 8 6 #uli)$%$ co%firmed to h$ve received
the compl$i%t $g$i%st
the judge $%d others. 8e s$id th$t $ctio% will be t$ke% $fter verif)i%g the
compl$i%t.
:his is the seco%d compl$i%t rel$ted to dowr) h$r$ssme%t filed $g$i%st $
judge i% the st$te i% the
rece%t p$st.
0$rlier* $ wom$% h$d filed $ compl$i%t $g$i%st $dditio%$l sessio%s judge of
.etpur $fter her
d$ughter $%d the judgeIs wife committed suicide.

urgaon 8udge to also face dowry harassment charge

7urg$o%Is -hief .udici$l #$gistr$te 6$v%eet 7$rg* booked for the murder of
his wife* will $lso
f$ce dowr) h$r$ssme%t ch$rge* police here s$id #o%d$).
9olice h$ve issued %otices to the -.#Is f$ther H.H. 7$rg $%d mother 6$ch%$
7$rg* who h$ve
$lso bee% %$med i% the dowr) h$r$ssme%t c$se.
:he -.#Is f$ther re$ched here #o%d$) mor%i%g from 8$r)$%$Is 9$%chkul$
tow% $%d co%t$cted
police* who w$%ted to @uestio% him.
LAe h$d c$lled -.#Is p$re%ts...H.H. 7$rg w$s @uestio%ed b) speci$l
i%vestig$tio% te$m F(&:G*L
7urg$o% 9olice -ommissio%er !lok #itt$l s$id.
#itt$l s$id o% the b$sis of writte% compl$i%t filed b) the p$re%ts of the
-.#Is wife 7eet$%j$li*
pe%$l sectio%s of dowr) h$r$ssme%t $%d e;tr$-m$rit$l $ff$ir were i%cluded
i% the 1&6 lodged
$g$i%st the -.# ($turd$).
7eet$%j$li* 2,* bore three bullet wou%ds - o% her chi%* chest $%d stom$ch -
but %o bullets were
fou%d i% her bod) th$t w$s recovered here :hursd$). :he -.#Is lice%sed
fire$rm w$s fou%d %e$r
the bod)* police s$id.
#itt$l s$id two bullets were seiEed from the sce%e of crime $%d would be
se%t for b$llistic
e;$mi%$tio% #o%d$)* $ d$) $fter b$llistic e;perts e;$mi%ed the crime spot.
L:he (&: (u%d$) @uestio%ed two wome% rel$tives of 6$v%eet 7$rg for hours
$t his gover%me%t
$llotted house here i% the Bfficers -olo%)*L s$id #itt$l.
LAe h$ve $sked -.# to produce supporti%g evide%ces to prove his
st$teme%t*L he s$id.
:he -.# $llegedl) s$id th$t his driver $%d domestic help m$) throw some
light o% his wifeIs
de$th.
.udge 7$rgIs i%-l$ws $lleged th$t two c$rs were provided to the $ccused o%
his $%d his f$mil)Is
dem$%d. 6s.2 l$kh were $lso delivered to him $t the time of the $dmissio%
of his d$ughters i%
school i% #$).
7eet$%j$liIs brother 9r$deep !gg$rw$l ($turd$) lodged $ first i%form$tio%
report $g$i%st 7$rg
$%d his p$re%ts* $ccusi%g them of murder.
L6$v%eet $%d 7eet$%j$li got m$rried i% 5ovember 2007. 0ver)thi%g w$s fi%e
for $ few )e$rs but
the $ttitude of 6$v%eet $%d his p$re%ts tow$rds 7eet$%j$li st$rted ch$%gi%g
$fter she delivered
two b$b) girls F%ow $ged $rou%d four $%d $ h$lf $%d three )e$rsG*L !gg$rw$l
s$id i% his
compl$i%t.
8e dem$%ded $ probe b) the -e%tr$l 3ure$u of &%vestig$tio% F-3&G i%to his
sisterIs murder.

seGual harassment6 0ntern moEes S) for inFuiry against Justice Swatanter
5umar

'ew Delhi6 ! former l$w i%ter%* who h$s m$de se;u$l h$r$ssme%t
$lleg$tio%s $g$i%st .ustice (w$t$%ter Hum$r* tod$) moved the (upreme
-ourt seeki%g i%@uir) $g$i%st the retired judge.
! be%ch he$ded b) -hief .ustice 9 ($th$siv$m* before whom the m$tter w$s
me%tio%ed for urge%t he$ri%g* $greed to t$ke up the c$se o% .$%u$r) 15.
:he i%ter%* i% the petitio%* ch$lle%ged the $pe; courtIs /ecember 5* 201+
full court resolutio% i% which it w$s decided th$t %o compl$i%t $g$i%st its
retired judges will be e%tert$i%ed.

:he petitio%er $lso submitted th$t $ proper forum be co%stituted to co%duct
i%@uir) i% such c$ses $%d her compl$i%t be $lso looked i%to b) the $pe;
court like it w$s do%e i% the c$se of se;u$l h$r$ssme%t $lleg$tio%s $g$i%st
.ustice FretdG ! H 7$%gul).
:he i%ter% h$s m$de .ustice Hum$r* (ecret$r) 7e%er$l of the (upreme -ourt
$%d 2%io% of &%di$ p$rties i% the c$se.
(he submitted th$t .ustice Hum$r w$s $ sitti%g judge $t the time of the
$lleged i%cide%t $%d the $pe; court must look i%to the compl$i%t $s per
Jish$k$ guideli%es.
.ustice Hum$r* who is curre%tl) he$di%g the 5$tio%$l 7ree% :ribu%$l* h$s
described the $lleg$tio%s $s Li%credulous $%d f$lseL $%d Lsome ki%d of
co%spir$c)L.

0" confirms 4ysore (oost (esort seG scandal

:he &%tellige%ce 3ure$u h$s provided the -e%tre with $ det$iled $ccou%t of
the esc$p$de
i%volvi%g three H$r%$t$k$ 8igh -ourt judges o% 5ovember + i% $ resort o%
the outskirts of
#)sore* highl) pl$ced sources told :he :imes of &%di$ o% 1rid$).
!ccordi%g to $ se%ior offici$l* >#ost of the i%form$tio% sought h$s %ot o%l)
co%firmed the ver$cit)
of the i%cide%t but the gover%me%t h$s crosschecked it with $%other police
$ge%c). 3oth the
reports m$tch.?
:he i%cide%t w$s widel) reported i% the medi$. Ah$t h$s surprised the
-e%tre is the >dogged
refus$l? of the H$r%$t$k$ police to co%firm the i%cide%t. >#)sore 9olice
-ommissio%er -.
-h$%dr$sekh$r first de%ied th$t the i%cide%t ever took pl$ce. B%l) whe% $
public %otice w$s
issued through the high court registr$r seeki%g i%form$tio% o% the #)sore
sc$%d$l* did the f$cts
come out i% the ope%. 9ublic protest helped $ lot*? s$)s the source.
Ah$t tr$%spired $t the resort* s$)s the source* >c$%%ot be e;pected from
$%)o%e i% civil societ)*
le$ve $lo%e perso%s swor% to upholdi%g the l$w?. !ccordi%g to him* >:he &3
report co%sists of
u%me%tio%$ble f$cts $%d $lso m$kes it $mpl) cle$r th$t the #)sore i%cide%t
is %ot the first time
such thi%gs h$ve h$ppe%ed. -$% $%)o%e e;pect upholders of the l$w to pick
$ fight with people
who compl$i%ed to the police whe% c$ught i% $ compromisi%g positio%<?
&% $ rel$ted developme%t* H$r%$t$k$ 8igh -ourt -hief .ustice 5.H. .$i% h$s
writte% to -hief
.ustice of &%di$ .ustice 7.3. 9$tt$%$ik $ski%g th$t three judges be
tr$%sferred. .$i% h$s proposed
th$t .ustice 5.(. Jeer$bh$dr$i$h be tr$%sferred to the 9$t%$ 8igh -ourt*
.ustice
-h$%dr$sekh$r$i$h to .$mmu 4 H$shmir $%d .ustice J. 7op$l$ 7owd$ to the
7$uh$ti 8igh
-ourt.
Ahile .$i% is u%derstood %ot to h$ve give% $%) re$so%s* highl) pl$ced
sources s$) the propos$l
for tr$%sfers is li%ked to the #)sore i%cide%t.
8owever* the source s$)s th$t %ow the gover%me%t is worried $bout the
$ppropri$te >remedi$l
me$sures?. &% such c$ses* tr$%sferri%g $ judge to $ remote high court
does%Ct $lw$)s work. 8e
s$)s* >3$r $ssoci$tio%s $%d the people of %orthe$ster% st$tes were up i%
$rms whe% some
judges of the 9u%j$b $%d 8$r)$%$ high courts were tr$%sferred there. Ae
e;pect simil$r protests
if the -.& $ccepts .ustice .$i%Cs propos$l to tr$%sfer the three judges of the
H$r%$t$k$ 8igh
-ourt.?
:he 3$r -ou%cil of &%di$ o% 1rid$)* while e;pressi%g its $%guish $t the
H$r%$t$k$ i%cide%t* c$lled
for >follow-up $ctio%?.
>2%less prompt $%d $ppropri$te $ctio% is t$ke%* it will erode the f$ith of
public i% the o%l)
i%stitutio% co%sidered to be the b$stio% of our fighti%g f$ith i% democr$c)*?
it s$id i% $ st$teme%t.
:he 3-& h$s >l$me%ted? i%$ctio% i% this c$se b) >the higher judici$r) $%d
the gover%me%t?.

6e$d more: &3 co%firms #)sore se; sc$%d$l D :he :imes of &%di$
http://timesofi%di$.i%di$times.com/cit)/b$%g$lore/&3-co%firms-#)sore-
se;sc$%d$l/$rticleshow/2=8012.cmsUi;EE1379tv1d2 *

6e$d full det$ils i% the $tt$chme%t
https://docs.google.com/viewer<
$Vv4pidVsites4srcidV"7JmKWJsd76vbA1pb%;Eb+5ldm=pK2Jmb+.@dW50$A5
lf7d,Bjc+#j2EB72,5/20"/1lB/g *
https://docs.google.com/viewer<
$Vv4pidVsites4srcidV"7JmKWJsd76vbA1pb%;Eb+5ldm=pK2Jmb+.@dW50$A5
lf7d,Bjc+#j2EB72,5/20"/1lB/g *

%anel names former 0ndia Supreme )ourt 8udge anguly in seG
harassment allegation

(hocked* sh$ttered b) $lleg$tio%s: former (upreme -ourt judge 7$%gul)
5ew /elhi: ! three-member p$%el th$t probed the ch$rge of se;u$l
h$r$ssme%t of $ )ou%g l$w)er b) $ (upreme -ourt judge h$s submitted its
report* ide%tif)i%g the judge $s ! H 7$%gul)* court sources s$id o% 1rid$).
:he report w$s submitted o% :hursd$) $fter the committee of three judges
met si; times. :his is the first time $% $lleged perpetr$tor h$s bee% %$med.
:he report* submitted to -hief .ustice 9 ($th$siv$m* $lso c$rries the
st$teme%ts of the victim* who i%ter%ed i% the (upreme -ourt* $%d th$t of
the %ow-retired .ustice 7$%gul)* the sources s$id.
:he gr$du$te of Holk$t$-b$sed 5$tio%$l 2%iversit) of .udici$l (cie%ces
F52.(G h$d $lleged se;u$l h$r$ssme%t b) 7$%gul) while i%ter%i%g for him i%
/ecember 2012.
:he committee* which held si; sitti%gs o% 5ovember 1+* 1=* 21* 2* $%d 27*
submitted its report to -hief .ustice ($th$siv$m o% 5ovember 28.
:he victim $ppe$red before the committee o% 5ovember 1= $%d w$s
e;pected to $ppe$r $g$i% o% 5ovember 21 but chose to st$) $w$).
(he first me%tio%ed the i%cide%t i% $ blog for .our%$l of &%di$% '$w $%d
(ociet) o% 5ovember $%d l$ter told the s$me i% $% i%terview with 'eg$ll)
&%di$ website.
:he victim* who is worki%g with 5$tur$l .ustice: '$w)ers for -ommu%ities
$%d 0%viro%me%t* s$id she he$rd th$t there were three other girls besides
her who were se;u$ll) h$r$ssed b) the s$me judge.
(he $lso cl$imed to h$ve k%owledge of four more girls who were $llegedl)
h$r$ssed b) other judges i% their ch$mbers.
/e%)i%g $%) se;u$l h$r$ssme%t* 7$%gul) o% 1rid$) s$id he w$s >shocked $%d
sh$ttered? b) the ch$rges $g$i%st him.
>& $m de%)i%g ever)thi%g. & h$ve told the committee th$t $ll the $lleg$tio%s
levelled b) the i%ter% $re wro%g. & do%Ct k%ow how such $lleg$tio%s h$ve
bee% levelled $g$i%st me*? he s$id.
>& $m $ victim of situ$tio%s*? he told televisio% ch$%%els.
>& $m %ot $sh$med of $%)thi%g*? he s$id i% repl) to $ @uestio% reg$rdi%g the
$lleged episode which c$me out i% public $fter the victim spoke $bout it i%
the leg$l port$l e$rlier this mo%th.
8e s$id the ch$rges $g$i%st him were tot$ll) wro%g. :he girl h$d %ot r$ised
$%) se;u$l h$r$ssme%t issue with him* he s$id* $ddi%g th$t he h$d %ot do%e
$%) ph)sic$l h$rm to her.
:he former judge s$id the i%ter% worked with him though she w$s %ot
offici$ll) $lloc$ted to him. (he c$me i% the pl$ce of $%other i%ter% who h$d
go%e $bro$d $fter m$rri$ge. >& %ever put up $ poster. (he c$me o% her
ow%.?
8e s$id the girl h$d come to his house o% $ %umber of occ$sio%s i%
co%%ectio% with work.

(uchika irhotra case6 Family giEes up fight against eG-7aryana D%
!j$) (ur$* :55 X .u% 2* 2012* 0,.0=9# &(:

-8!5/&7!68: :he f$mil) of 6uchik$ 7irhotr$* $ mi%or girl who $llegedl)
committed suicide $fter molest$tio% b) former 8$r)$%$ director ge%er$l of
police F/79G (9( 6$thore* h$s give% up its fight for justice i% the court of
l$w $fter 22 )e$rs.
:he speci$l -3& court 9$%chkul$ o% 1rid$) $ccepted the closure report
submitted b) the -e%tr$l 3ure$u of &%vestig$tio% F-3&G i% two c$ses -
$ttempt to murder $%d forger) of docume%ts- filed $g$i%st former 8$r)$%$
/79 (9( 6$thore.
6uchik$Is f$ther (ubh$sh $%d brother !shu r$ised %o objectio% to the closure
report.

!dmitti%g th$t he w$s %ot i% $ positio% to pursue the m$tter further*
(ubh$sh s$id* L& do %ot see $%) hope %ow. Ae feel che$ted. #) f$mil) is
vul%er$ble. :he circumst$%ces h$ve pushed us b$ck b) 20 )e$rs.L
LAhe% 6$thore w$s co%victed i% 200=* & met u%io% home mi%ister 9 -
-hid$mb$r$m who $ssured me of justice. & thought time $%d s)stem h$d
ch$%ged $%d d$red to move fresh compl$i%ts $g$i%st 6$thore.L B% .$%u$r)
12* 2010 the -3& registered three fresh 1&6s $g$i%st 6$thore - $ttempt to
murder* $betme%t to suicide $%d doctori%g of docume%ts. 8owever* i%
5ovember 2010* the -3& submitted the closure report i% two c$ses. :he
closure report w$s $ccepted b) the court o% 1rid$).
L3ut %ow $fter fi%di%g th$t the s)stem c$%%ot be ch$%ged* we decided %ot
to pursue it further*L 7irhotr$ s$id.
6uchik$Is disillusio%ed f$ther s$id th$t he h$d prese%ted $ lot of m$teri$l
$%d some wit%esses rel$ted to the fresh c$ses before the $ge%c). L3ut the
$ge%c) w$s $d$m$%t o% closi%g the c$se.L
(ubh$sh forced his so% $%d f$mil) i%to e;ile $fter 6uchik$Is de$th* fe$ri%g
further h$r$ssme%t $t the h$%ds of the former /79. /uri%g this period* the
f$mil) shifted betwee% sever$l cities $%d retur%ed to 9$%chkul$ m$%) )e$rs
l$ter o%l) to le$d $% i%co%spicuous life.
:he third c$se $g$i%st 6$thore- $betme%t to suicide - is still pe%di%g. :he
-3& could %ot file $%) report $s the 9u%j$b $%d 8$r)$%$ high court h$s
ordered st$tus @uo o% it. 3esides 6$thore* former !mb$l$ (9 H9 (i%gh* sub-
i%spector 9rem /utt $%d $ssist$%t sub-i%spectors .$i 5$r$)$% $%d (ew$ (i%gh
were $lso %$med i% the 1&6.
&% its closure report* the -3& h$s s$id th$t the $lleg$tio%s levelled b)
(ubh$sh 7irhotr$ $%d his so% !shu $g$i%st 6$thore were u%fou%ded. :he -3&
$lso cl$imed th$t the $lleg$tio%s could %ot be subst$%ti$ted L$s per the
docume%t$r) evide%ce $%d or$l testimo%) of wit%esses.L
(uchika )ase---/imeline
!ugust 12* 1==0-- (9( 6$thore* the% &7 $%d 9reside%t* 8$r)$%$ '$w% :e%%is
!ssoci$tio% F8':!G molested 6uchik$
(eptember 1==0--6uchik$ e;pelled from school for Ii%discipli%eI followi%g her
$lleg$tio%s $g$i%st 6$thore
(eptember +* 1==0-- !% &%@uir) report i%dicts 6$thore
Bctober 2+* 1==+-- 6uchik$Is brother $rrested i% sever$l theft c$ses
/ecember 28* 1==+-- 6uchik$ co%sumed poiso%ous subst$%ce
/ecember 2=* 1==+-- 6uchik$ died
!ugust 21* 1==8-- 8igh -ourt directs -3& to co%duct i%@uir)
/ecember 21* 200=-- -3& court se%te%ced si; mo%thsI rigorous impriso%me%t
to 6$thore
.$%u$r) 12* 2010-- -3& registered three fresh 1&6s leveli%g ch$rges of
$ttempt to murder* $betme%t to suicide $%d doctori%g docume%ts
5ovember 10* 2010-- -3& filed closure

1ighti%g (e;u$l Jiole%ce &% ! -ou%tr) Ahose 9olice /oes%Ct 6espo%d :o
/istress -$lls
"y Samar

:he c$lls were %ot getti%g $%swered* %ot $ si%gle o%e of them. :he frie%d
w$s recou%ti%g the t$le of $ fem$le frie%d held host$ge b) some people i%
her ow% house with horror. & w$s c$lli%g the (e%ior (uperi%te%de%t of 9olice
$%d other officers* district $dmi%istr$tio%* the loc$l police st$tio%. 0ver)
p$ssi%g mi%ute w$s se%di%g shivers dow% m) spi%e* he co%ti%ued.
Aorst w$s the respo%se of the police st$tio% where full ri%gs we%t with
%obod) $%sweri%g them. Ah$t for these police st$tio%s $re if the) c$%%ot
respo%d to such emerge%cies< :he stor)* i% short* w$s eeril) simil$r to
cou%tless other stories of bodies of wome% bei%g tur%ed i%to the site of
Mho%ourC $%d b$ttles for the s$me. :he )ou%ger brother of the wom$% i% this
c$se h$d m$rried $ girl out of love $%d the% the couple eloped for s$fet).
:he c$se did %ot i%volve $%) c$ste co%flicts* iro%ic$ll)* $s both of them
belo%ged to the s$me c$ste. &t w$s the girlCs decisio% to choose her life
p$rt%er o% her ow% th$t h$d irked the f$mil) members* self-desig%$ted
custodi$%s of the girl i% $%) p$tri$rch$l societ). &t w$s this the) w$%ted to
$ve%ge $%d h$d* therefore* l$%ded o% the wom$%Cs house i% the de$d of the
%ight $%d held her host$ge.
:he) h$d $lso co%fisc$ted her pho%es for stoppi%g her from seeki%g $%)
help. (he w$s $sked to tell where the couple w$s $%d thre$te%ed with r$pe
$%d getti%g p$r$ded %$ked if she did %ot. (he* i% f$ct* did %ot k%ow. Ket*
she $sked for her pho%e o% the e;cuse th$t $ frie%d might k%ow the coupleCs
loc$tio% $%d she will $sk her. :h$t is how the frie%d & w$s t$lki%g to c$me to
k%ow $bout the i%cide%t. (he* i% tur%* tried to co%t$ct ever) possible perso%
who could help st$rti%g with the loc$l police.
!s & s$id before* the police did %ot $%swer the c$lls eve% o%ce le$vi%g her
flummo;ed. :he% she st$rted co%t$cti%g her frie%ds i% medi$ $%d wome%Cs
moveme%t who could* fi%$ll)* re$ch the police $%d m$ke them $ct. :he
host$ge situ$tio% w$s broke% %e;t mor%i%g $fter hours lo%g orde$l for the
wom$%. . :h$%kfull)* she w$s rescued before getti%g viol$ted despite bei%g
kept i% illeg$l co%fi%eme%t. :h$t too* it broke bec$use the wom$% w$s well
co%%ected $%d her frie%d could re$ch people i% positio%s of helpi%g Ah$t
would h$ppe% to $% ordi%$r) wom$% with %o such co%t$cts is $%)bod)Cs
guess.
:his h$ppe%ed i% $ cou%tr) which s$w $ %$tio%$l outpouri%g of $%ger $g$i%st
viole%ce $g$i%st wome% $fter brut$l g$%g r$pe $%d subse@ue%t de$th of $
)ou%g girl i% /elhi l$st /ecember. :he popul$r protests h$d sh$ke% the
gover%me%t of the d$) i%to $ctio% $%d it c$me up with %ew l$ws $g$i%st
r$pe $%d promised heighte%ed securit) for wome% $cross &%di$. :h$t the
ch$%ges were cosmetic gets betr$)ed b) stories $fter stories of viole%ce
$g$i%st wome% bei%g committed i% the cou%tr). 2tt$r 9r$desh* most
populous provi%ce of the cou%tr) h$s bee% i% %ews for sp$te of g$%g r$pes
$%d murders. #$dh)$ 9r$desh which h$s %ot bee% i% %ews despite
performi%g worse is offici$ll) $ck%owledged r$pe c$pit$l of the cou%tr).
0ve% pl$ces which were co%sidered s$fer for wome% i% the p$st h$ve see% $
rise i% i%cide%ts of se;u$l viole%ce. #umb$i* for i%st$%ce* wit%essed $
p$sse%ger $tt$cki%g $ fem$le bus co%ductor $%d te$ri%g her clothes i% bro$d
d$)light.
:he %ew l$w* evide%tl)* h$s %ot worked o% the grou%d. &t will %ot for l$ws*
however good* %eed i%stitutio%s to work $%d if i%stitutio% $re defu%ct
$%d/or devi$%t the) $re bou%d to f$il. Ah$t l$w c$% s$ve $ wom$% if the
police would %ot do $s much $s t$ki%g $ distress c$ll< Ah$t l$w would s$ve
someo%e from getti%g r$ped if she is held host$ge for hours i% her ow%
house< Ah$t l$w would s$ve $ girl w$%ti%g to m$rr) out of her ow% choice if
the police c$%%ot offer $s much $s protectio% to her< :he cou%tr) h$s see%
c$ses of Hh$p 9$%ch$)$ts Fc$ste cou%cilsG killi%g couple h$vi%g police
protectio% $%d the% thre$te%i%g the judge who se%te%ced those respo%sible.
&%teresti%gl)* the loc$l police did %ot beef up the securit) cover for the
judge despite her repe$ted ple$s $s the) were h$%d i% gloves with the
murderers.
&%troduci%g %ewer* h$rsher l$ws is %ot goi%g to curb se;u$l viole%ce i% &%di$.
B%l) thi%g th$t c$% is r$dic$l restructuri%g of the crimi%$l justice s)stem b)
m$ki%g it respo%sive $%d respo%sible. 8$vi%g dedic$ted te$ms to respo%d to
emerge%cies might be $ begi%%i%g but u%til $%d u%less imp$rti$l
i%vestig$tio%s e%di%g i% speed) co%victio%s become the %orm* %othi%g will
ch$%ge o% the grou%d.
:ill the%* we c$% m$ke do police st$tio%s which do %ot respo%d to distress
c$lls.

(ethinking (ule Of &aw 0n /he /imes Of (ape "id On $ Judge
"y Samar

!% $ttempt to r$pe $ judge* th$t too i% .udgesC -ompou%d i% !lig$rh which
rem$i%s u%der twe%t) four hour vigil of the 9rovi%ci$l !rmed -o%st$bul$r)
spe$ks volumes $bout the st$tus of l$w $%d order i% 2tt$r 9r$desh* the most
populous st$te of &%di$. Aho will be s$fe o% the streets whe% eve% $ judge is
%ot sp$red b) the r$pists< 5o o%e* i% f$ct is* $s evide%ced b) the rece%t
sp$te of i%cide%ts of se;u$l viole%ce $g$i%st wome% from m$rgi%$lised $%d
dispossessed b$ckgrou%ds. :he gruesome g$%g r$pe $%d murder of two
mi%ors i% 3$d$u%* the most gh$stl) of them* h$s c$used $ %$tio%$l outr$ge
just $ few d$)s before this i%cide%t. :he br$Ee% $tt$ck o% the mother of $
r$pe survivor i% order to force her to withdr$w the compl$i%t $g$i%st the
$ccused* curre%tl) i% j$il* i% %e$rb) 0t$h w$s $%other gl$ri%g e;$mple of
tot$l coll$pse of rule of l$w i% 2tt$r 9r$desh.
($dl)* the st$te h$s %ever bee% k%ow% for m$i%t$i%i%g eve% l$w $%d order*
forget e%forci%g rule of l$w. &t h$s r$ther h$d the dubious disti%ctio% of
bei%g the proverbi$l 3$d '$%ds* the cou%tr)side ru% b) might $%d %ot b)
rulebooks. Aith both politic$l $%d bure$ucr$tic le$dership oscill$ti%g
betwee% the de%i$l to dodgi%g mode* the rece%t c$ses of se;u$l $ss$ults
h$ve merel) rei%forced the im$ge. :hi%k of $ -hief #i%ister s$)i%g th$t
r$pes were commo% $%d $ 7oogle se$rch would retur% m$%) >3$d$u% like
i%cide%tsC. :hi%k of his f$ther* $ former chief mi%ister $%d curre%t
p$rli$me%t$ri$%* termi%g r$pe $s mi%or mist$ke. :he /irector 7e%er$l of
9olice of the st$te* however* took the crow% b) justif)i%g the i%cide%ts of
r$pe $s M%orm$lC i% $ st$te of the siEe $%d popul$tio% of 2tt$r 9r$desh.
:here were others* l$rgel) i% the secul$r liber$l i%tellige%tsi$ of the
cou%tr)* who s$w $ politic$l co%spir$c) h$tched b) the 8i%du right behi%d
def$mi%g the st$te. :he) c$me up* rightl)* with the d$t$ from the 5$tio%$l
-rime 6ecords 3ure$u th$t shows #$dh)$ 9r$desh $s the r$pe c$pit$l of
&%di$ $%d r$ised @uestio%s over the u%due scruti%) of 2tt$r 9r$desh. :he
i%tellige%tsi$* u%fortu%$tel)* seems to h$ve got it wro%g o%ce $g$i%* first
time bei%g its sile%ce o% the c$ses where victims c$me from dispossessed
$%d m$rgi%$lised commu%ities. :he l$ck of outr$ge over se;u$l viole%ce
$g$i%st wome% from /$lit* trib$l* mi%orities $%d other such commu%ities
u%til the c$ses $re re$ll) gor)* $s 3$d$u% w$s* h$s led to $ sectio% of people
losi%g f$ith i% them* it would do better %ot to lose $ll.
:he @uestio%* however* is if the f$ilure of $ st$te i% providi%g securit) to its
wome% c$% be used $s $% e;cuse to defe%d the tot$l coll$pse of rule of l$w
i% $%other< (hould %ot $ si%gle c$se of r$pe be horrif)i%g e%ough for the
st$te to w$ke up $%d fi; the s)stem< -$% $ st$te re$ll) t$ke refuge i%
competitive st$tistics $%d shirk from its respo%sibilit) of m$i%t$i%i%g l$w
$%d order* $t le$st< :his is e;$ctl) where th$t the gover%me%t of 2tt$r
9r$desh h$s f$iled $%d f$iled $bsolutel). :h$tCs %ot biE$rre if o%e sees the
%umber of crimi%$ls i% it right from its r$%ks $%d files to the mi%istr). !fter
$ll* the st$te h$s $ dubious disti%ctio% of seeki%g the withdr$w$l of r$pe
ch$rges $g$i%st $ mi%ister i% Mpublic i%terestC.
&t is i% this co%te;t th$t the r$pe $ttempt o% $ sitti%g judge must be see% $s
$ w$keup c$ll for both the citiEe%r) $%d the st$te. 5o people c$% live i%
perpetu$l fe$r of viole%ce $g$i%st wome% $%d st$teIs i%$ctio% will merel)
i%cre$se both vigil$%tism $%d co%trol of the mobilit) of wome% i% the %$me
of s$fet)* $ d$%gerous thi%g for $ democr$c). 9$rr)i%g $w$) the @uestio%s
over the st$te of gover%$%ce i% 2tt$r 9r$desh is %ot goi%g to serve $%)
purpose* o%l) bri%gi%g the crimi%$ls to justice will. :he st$te gover%me%t
must e%sure speed) $%d imp$rti$l justice to the victims $%d their f$milies to
restore their f$ith i% the s)stem.

$%%!$& U'D!( S!) *+ ,-. OF (/0 $)/ 1223 OF OV!('4!'/ OF 0'D0$
& OV!('4!'/ OF 5$('$/$5$
(ef 6 D!%OJ<!<12*;<223-* (/0 First $ppeal sent Eia D$(%
$%%&0)$/0O' FO( 0'FO(4$/0O' $S %!( (/0 $)/ 1223
, S!! (U&! 11 OF (/0 $)/ 1223 .

(/0 First $ppeal "efore 6
Shri . 4.5. 7an8ura 9
(egistrar & (/0 First $ppellate $uthority 9
Supreme )ourt of 0ndia 9
'ew Delhi .

FU&& '$4! OF /7! $%%&0)$'/ 6 '$$($J$.4.(.

$DD(!SS OF /7! $%%&0)$'/ 6 '$$($J$.4.(.9
!D0/O( 9 SOS !-VO0)! JUS/0)! & SOS !-)&$(0O' OF D$&0/ 9
> &0-1 < =:*9 O%% ?$/!( ?O(5S OFF0)!9
7UD)O F0(S/ S/$!9 &$@405$'/$'$$(9
7!""$&9 4ASO(! 9 5$('$/$5$ %0' B 3=22*=.

$t the outset 9 we eGpress our whole hearted respects to the honest
few puDlic serEants in puDlic serEice including 8udiciary. 7oweEer9 the
corrupt in puDlic serEice donHt deserEe respect as indiEiduals B as they
are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they occupy
Dut not the corrupt indiEiduals.

$ll the following articles < issues 9 whole articles puDlished in the
weDlinks mentioned Delow forms part of this appeal. /he
term MJUD!Nmentioned throught includes all puDlic serEants
discharging 8udicial functions right from taluk magistrates 9 Fuasi-8udicial

sale. 0t is a S7$4!. /he persons who raise their Eoice seeking 8ustice
are silenced in many ways. /he criminal neGus has already attempted to
silence me in many ways . 0f anything untoward happens to me or to my
family memDers 9 my dependents 9 7onouraDle )hief Justice of 0ndia
together with 8urisdictional police officer will De responsiDle for it.

honouraDle supreme court of 0ndia & other goEernment authorities9 in
apprehending criminals including corrupt 8udges & police. 7erewith 9 we
once again appeal to the honouraDle supreme court of 0ndia 9 to
consider this as a %0& $ppeal in puDlic interest.

/he puDlic serEants & the goEernment must De role models in law
aDiding acts 9 for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is eGcusaDle & can De corrected Dy the teacher. if the teacher
himself makes a mistake 9 all his students will do the same mistake. if a
thief steals 9 he can De caught 9 legally punished & reformed . if a police
prosecuted & 8ustice can De sought Dy the aggrieEed. 8ust think 9 if a
8udge himself that too of apeG court of the land itself commits crime -
Eiolations of (/0 $ct 9 constitutional rights & human rights of puDlic and
duties 9 what happens # it giEes a Dooster dose to the rich & mighty 9
those in power 9 criminals in puDlic serEice to committ more crimes.
that is eGactly what is happenning in india. the educated puDlic must
raise to the occassion & peacefully 9 democratically must oppose this
criminalisation of 8udiciary 9 puDlic serEice. then alone 9 we can Duild a
($4 ($JA$ OF 4$7$/4$ $'D70QS D(!$4.

.idl$ go t*roug* t*e ,ollo/ig articles 0 +ro1ide justice #$ gi1ig
co"+lete trut*,ul i,or"atio to us 2 #$ +u#licl$ as/erig t*e
,ollo/ig 3uestioaire i a ua"#iguous "aer.

4*e costitutio o, Idia *as +rescri#ed certai 5&N'AMEN4A6 '&4IE)
to eac* citi7es o, Idia. It is t*e dut$ o, e1er$ citi7e to +rotect 0
u+*old t*e digit$ 2 *oour o, our de"ocratic istitutios 2 to
+rotect our atioal itegrit$ 2 to res+ect 0 +rotect t*e rig*ts o, our
,ello/ citi7es. No costitutioal aut*orit$ *as t*e rig*t to o#struct
t*e disc*arge o, t*ese duties #$ citi7es o, Idia. No legal +ri1ileges o,
costitutioal ,uctioaries is su+erior o1er t*e 5&N'AMEN4A6 '&4IE)
85 9I4I:EN;) 85 IN'IA.
!e eed rig*ts to +er,or" our duties. 9ostitutio o, Idia *as
guarateed t*ose rig*ts as 5&N'AMEN4A6 RI(<4) to all citi7es o, Idia
0 #$ #irt* itsel, e1er$oe o, us *as secured <&MAN RI(<4) as
idi1iduals. 4o e=+ress oursel1es 2 /e eed i,or"atio 2 data ,eed
#ac> 2 to ascertai /*et*er /e are gettig e3ual o++ortuit$ 2 /*et*er
/e are gettig e3uita#le justice 2 etc 2 /e eed i,or"atio . so 2
#asicall$ Rig*t 4o I,or"atio is a ialiea#le +art o, our
,uda"etal rig*ts 0 *u"a rig*ts. !*at R4I Act *as doe is ,i=ed ti"e
li"it 2 res+osi#ilities o, +u#lic ser1ats u+ to certai e=tet.
<o/e1er t*e citi7e;s ,uda"etal rig*t 0 *u"a rig*t to see>
i,or"atio e=teds ,ar #e$od t*e sco+e o, R4I Act.
<ere#$ 2 /e see> co"+lete trut*,ul i,or"atio ,ro" su+re"e court o,
Idia 2 /it* res+ect to "$ R4I a++licatio a++eal. <ERE?@ 2 !E ARE
8N6@ )EE.IN( A998&N4A?I6I4@ 85 A&?6I9 )ERVAN4) IN A&?6I9
IN4ERE)4 0 %&)4I9E. <ere#$ 2 /e re3uest $ou to register t*is a++eal
as a AI6 +etitio 0 to ascertai t*e stad o, a+e= court o 1arious
"atters raised i "$ R4I A++licatio 2 i +u#lic iterest 0 e3uita#le
justice.

?e salute honest few in puDlic serEice 9 Judiciary 9 police 9 parliament
& state legislatiEe assemDlies. our whole hearted respects to them.
7!(!"A 9 0 DO 7U4"&A (!IU!S/ AOU /O 0V! 4! ?(0//!' S/$/!4!'/S <
$'S?!(S /O /7! FO&&O?0' IU!S/0O'S B ?70)7 0' 0/S!&F , ie
answers . $(! /7! 0'FO(4$/0O' SOU7/ "A 4!. 7!(! ?0/7 0 $4
S!!50' 'O/ /7! O%0'0O'S $"OU/ SO4! 7A%O/7!/0)$& 0SSU!S 9 "U/
F(!IU!'/ O))U((!')! ?70)7 $(! V0O&$/0' %!O%&!HS FU'D$4!'/$&
(07/S & 7U4$' (07/S. ?! DO 7$V! 707!S/ (!S%!)/S FO(
JUD0)0$(A & $&& %U"&0) 0'S/0/U/0O'S 9 /70S 0S $' $%%!$& FO( /(U/7 9
0'FO(4$/0O' SO /7$/ /O $%%(!7!'D )O((U%/ F!? 0' %U"&0) S!(V0)!9
?7O $(! $0D0' & $"!//0' /!((O(0S4 9 U'D!(?O(&D & )(040'$&S. 0
7$V! S7O?' 0' D!/$0& ?0/7 &0V! 9 $)/U$& )$S!S 9 !@$4%&!S 9 7O?
0'D0$' &!$& SAS/!4 0S 4$'0%U&$/!D "A )(040'$&S ?0/70' JUD0)0$(A 9
%O&0)! 9 %(OS!)U/0O' 9 !/). (!$D D!/$0&S $/ 6
https6<<sites.google.com<site<eclarionofdalit<wheeling-dealing-8udges-
police 9
Atrocities o !o"e #$ %&'(E)
*tt+s://sites.google.co"/site/eclarioo,dalit/atrocities-#$-judges

()stem *

.ustice ($th$siv$m - !re )ou /0!1 /2#3 4 3'&5/
https://sites.google.com/site/ecl$rio%ofd$lit/justice-s$th$siv$m---$re-)ou-
de$f-dumb-bli%d *
6$jiv 7$%dhi !ss$ssi%$tio% -over-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/r$jiv-g$%dhi-
$ss$ssi%$tio%-cover-up *
(8!#0 (8!#0 #9s 4 #'!s
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/sh$me-sh$me-mps-ml$s
*

7ereDy 9 we do reFuest %0O O<O 7onouraDle )hief Justice of 0ndia 9
%0O 9 O<O 7.!.7onoraDle %resident of 0ndia 9 %0O O<O 7onoraDle Speaker
of &ok SaDha 9 %0O O<O Dy )hairman of (a8ya SaDha 9 %0Os of 5arnataka
(a8 "hawan 9 5arnataka )4O 9 Union 7ome 4inistry O0 and D & 0 of
%olice of oEernment of 5arnataka to answer the following Fuestions in
puDlic interest 9 for safeguarding national security 9 'ational unity &
integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals 9 criminals within the
8udiciary & police.
4ain $ 6
*. ?hat action you haEe taken against 8udges inEolEed in
atrocities against women 9 casewise # if not 9 why #
1. ?hat action you haEe taken against 8udges inEolEed in land
scams 9 casewise # if not 9 why #
-. 0 haEe shown with actual cases how manipulation < fiGing
takes place 9 from complaint filing to 8udicial pronouncement
stage. $re the 8udges & police 9 aDoEe law #
;. 0 haEe numerous %0&s 9 (/0 appeals Defore supreme court of
india. "ut they were not registered 9 not honoured 9 why #
3. /o my legal notice < show cause notice < damage payment
notice to supreme court of india & chief 8ustice of india 9 till date 0
haEe not receiEed the reply 9 why #
:. 0s it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life
& liDerty of all 0ndian citiOens #
=. 0s it not the failure of supreme court of india9 when it failed
to protect the life of a complainant #
K. "y negligence of their duties 9 are not supreme court 8udges
aiding & aDetting criminals 9 anti nationals & terrorists #
+. ?hile crores of 0ndians are Darely surEiEing on a single piece
meal a day 9 people dying due to starEation 9 supreme court 8udges
are getting salary & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from the
same suffering puDlic < puDlic eGcheFuer. $re not those duty
shirking 8udges ashamed #
*2. ?hat action you haEe taken against 8udges inEolEed in hushing
up late prime minister ra8iE andhi assassination case #
**. ?hy the supreme court of india didnHt allow me to appear
Defore it in the said case of late %4 (a8iE andhi $ssassination
)ase #
*1. ?hy the supreme court of india didnHt protect my life 9 my 8oD
oppurtunities 9 my newspaper from the wrath of criminal neGus #
*-. ?hen eEen caDle /V 8ournalists 9 weD 8ournalists are getting
%(!SS < 4!D0$ accreditation 9 my weD news papers 9 myself are not
getting %(!SS accreditation since + years 9 why #
*;. $re the supreme court 8udges hand in gloEes with the
criminal neGus #

4ain " 6
Aou haEe not taken appropriate action to my preEious (/0 reFuests 9
'umerous appeals for 8ustice & police complaints. Aou haEe not replied
to show-cause notice also. Aour inaction has helped the criminals in
manipulating & destroying eEidences.

Aour inaction < delay in performing your duties not only amounts to
denial of information 9 Dut amounts to Eiolation of our fundamental &
human rights 9 coEer-up of crimes 9 aiding & aDetting criminals . /he
criminal neGus tried to silence me in many ways. 0s not these acts of
yourHs a crime in itself #

0f your acts of crime coEer-ups 9 information < eEidence coEer-ups 9
aiding & aDetting criminals 9 silencing a crusader is 8ust & legal. /he
same type of acts of crimes performed Dy other citiOens will also De legal
#

4ain ) 6
$t the outset 9 we eGpress our whole hearted respects to all
constitutional institutions & to the honest few in puDlic serEice.
)ontempt of constitutional institutions 9 citiOens of 0ndia is Deing made
Dy the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselEes. /his is an
appeal to the honest few in puDlic serEice 9 constitutional positions 9 to
Dring their corrupt colleagues to Dook.

*. does the action of 4%s 9 4&$s taking money < receiEing
faEors from Eested interests 9 to formulate policy decisions 9 to raise
Fuestions in parliament < legislatiEe Dodies or to aDstain from Eoting
legal #
1. why transparent 9 fair inEestigation is not done in such
cases #
-. 8ust rememDer 9 the Eulgar acts of 4r."ora "aDu Singh in
state legislature & how some 4&$s Eulgarly DehaEed with 4s.Jayalalita
in state legislature 9 years ago. $re these type of Eulgar actions Dy 4%s &
4&$s legal # does not these constitute contempt of the house Dy 4%s &
4&$s themselEes #
;. all the peopleHs representatiEes from panchayath memDer
to president of 0ndia must read $")D Of Democracy proEide along
with.since independence of 0ndia till date 9 4%s & 4&$s are forcing
pro8ects on people against the wishes of people 9 formulating policies
against the wishes of people. $re not such pro8ects 9 goEernment policies
& &aws 9 undemocratic & illegal #
3. is the election commission of 0ndia Eerifying the
authenticity of affidaEits suDmitted Dy electoral candidates #
:. how many candidates haEe Deen caught so far for giEing
false affidaEits # are all the Eiolators prosecuted#
=. are the 4%s 9 4&$s suDmitting their wealth details on
affidaEits yearly to Eigilance authorities # defaulters 9 Eiolators how many
#
K. what legal action taken against Eiolators 9 defaulters 9 for
giEing false affidaEits #
+. who is checking the authenticity of those affidaEits
suDmitted Dy 4%s 9 4&$s #
*2. the agricultural incomes of some 4%s 9 4&$s 9 their kih & kin
raises eEen during the time of seEere drought 9 floods 9 fall in prices of
agricultural products 9 their companies register increase in turnoEer <
profits eEen during recession 9 the trusts < 'Os set up Dy them receiEe
huge donations. $re all these income legal #

4ain D 6
*. we do once again offer our conditional serEices to the
goEernment of india 9 all state goEernments & supreme court of india 9 in
apprehending taG eEaders 9 land graDDers 9 corrupt police 9 corrupt
8udges 9 corrupt puDlic serEants 9 laDor law Eiolators 9 etc. whom the the
goEernment officials 9 Eigilance authorities haEe failed to apprehend.
?hy the authorities 9 courts 9 supreme court of 0ndia 9 are not ready to
utiliOe our serEice # are they afraid of Deing caught #
1. the puDlic serEants 9 courts theselEes are delaying giEing
information < records to us in many cases. So in the issues < cases raised
Dy us 9 the clause of time Dar doe not apply. $re these delaying tactics of
puDlic serEants 9 courts legal #
-. why no proper 9 timely action was not taken Dased on
numerous police complaints made Dy us #
;. why D & 0% 9 oEernment of 5arnataka 9 has not made
any efforts to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VV0%s , mentioned in
our complaint . 9 from union & state home ministries #
3. the criminal neGus is trying to silence me in many ways 9
Dut the supreme court of 0ndia & national human rights commission has
failed to undo the in8ustices 9 why # is it Decause it is not a high profile
case # is it Decause it is not hi-fi 9 does not get image ratings 9 /(%s #
:. the puDlic serEants are aiding underworld 9 naGalites &
terrorists 9 Dy their delaying tactics & denial of information 9 records.
?hat action has Deen taken against such anti-national elements in puDlic
serEice #
=. how many complaints are made Dy 'agara8 .4.(. 9 7uman
(ights $ctiEist 9 4ysore ,editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-Eoice for
8ustice. to 5arnataka police 9 to national human rights commission to
supreme court of 0ndia till date # what action taken with respect to each
complaint #
K. the delay in taking action Dy puDlic serEants with respect
to following cases has resulted in more crimes 9 destruction <
manipulation of eEidences 9 records and more in8ustices to commonman.
?hy the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in
following cases #

)8) A++eal to )&AREME 98&R4 o, IN'IA
*tt+://e-clarioo,dalit.#logs+ot.co"/2010/0C/s-o-s-a++eal-to-su+re"e-
D
'EA6) IN 98&R4) 0 A86I9E )4A4I8N) REA' :
*tt+://sites.google.co"/site/eclarioo,dalit/sat$a"e1a-ja$ate 2
*tt+://e-clarioo,dalit.#logs+ot.co"/2011/01/sat$a"e1a-ja$ate.*t"l 2
A99&)E' 9*ie, %ustice o, Idia
*tt+://sites.google.co"/site/eclarioo,dalit/accused-c*ie,-justice-o,D
2
*tt+://e-clarioo,dalit.#logs+ot.co"/2011/02/accused-c*ie,-justice-o,D
9R8)) EEAM 85 <8N8&RA?6E 9<IE5 %&)4I9E 85 IN'IA 2 )&AREME 98&R4
85
IN'IA -
*tt+://crosscji.#logs+ot.co"/ 2
*tt+://crosse=a"o,c*ie,justice.#logs+ot.co"/ 2
*tt+://cri"eso,su+re"ecourt./ord+ress.co"/ 2
*tt+://crosscji./ord+ress.co"/ 2
*tt+://crosse=a"o,c*ie,justice./ord+ress.co"/ 2
9R8)) EEAM 85 &NI8N <8ME )E9RE4AR@ 2 (8I 2 NE! 'E6<I F
9R8)) EEAM 85 '(0I( 85 A86I9E 2 (8. 2 ?AN(A68RE F
9R8)) EEAM 85 (8VERN8R 2 RE)ERVE ?AN. 85 IN'IA
*tt+://t*e,tir#i.#logs+ot.co"/ 2 *tt+://t*e,tir#i.redi,,#logs.co"/
2 *tt+://t*e,tir#i./ord+ress.co"/
9R8)) EEAM 85 M&'A 98MMI))I8NER 2 M&'A 2 M@)8RE F
*tt+://cri"eso,"uda.#logs+ot.co"/ 2 *tt+://"ai1aa"uda.#logs+ot.
co"/
2 *tt+://cri"esat"uda"$sore./ord+ress.co"/ 2
9R8)) EEAM 85 ?'A 98MMI))I8NER 2 ?'A 2 ?AN(A68RE F
*tt+://cri"eso,#da.#logs+ot.co"/ 2 *tt+://#dacri"es./ord+ress.co"/ 2
98RA8RA4E 9RIME) RA( 9A?6E) 6IMI4E'
*tt+://cri"esatr+g.#logs+ot.co"/ 2
*tt+://cri"esatr+g./ord+ress.co"/ 2
*tt+://grou+s.$a*oo.co"/grou+/ag*r//"essage/21C
ME(A 5RA&' ?@ (8VERNMEN4 85 IN'IA
*tt+://"ega,raud#$goi.#logs+ot.co"/ 2
*tt+://"ega,raud#$goi./ord+ress.co"/ 2
*tt+://grou+s.$a*oo.co"/grou+/ag*r//"essage/196
are $ou read$ to catc* ta= t*ie1es B
M8?I6E A<8NE) 2 9&RREN9@ )9AN'A6)
reliace idustr$ /*ere is accouta#ilit$ B
cri"es at i,os$s ca"+us
*tt+://cri"eati,$.#logs+ot.co"/ 2
*tt+://cri"eati,$./ord+ress.co"/ 2
cri"es #$ ?.'.A agaist a +oor /o"a
*tt+://cri"eso,#da.#log+ot.co"/ 2
*tt+://#dacri"es./ord+ress.co"/ 2
cri"es o, lad "a,ia i Idia
*tt+://ladsca"siidia.#logs+ot.co"/ 2
*tt+://ladsca"./ord+ress.co"/ 2
currec$ t*e,ts i R?I Aress
*tt+://t*e,tir#i.#logs+ot.co"/ 2
*tt+://t*e,tir#i./ord+ress.co"/ 2
*tt+://grou+s.$a*oo.co"/grou+/ag*r//"essage/C0
>iller colas 0 >iller "edicies o, Idia
*tt+://deat*cola.#log+ot.co"/ 2
*tt+://deat*cola./ord+ress.co"/ 2
<8N8R 85 IN'IAN AA6IAMEN4 58R )A6E
http6<<sites.google.com<site<eclarionofdalit<honor-of-indian-parliament-
for-sale
%ersecuted 0(O4 S7$(40&$ of %uttaparthi $% B pushpa kolasani on
hunger strike in anantapur district 8ail $ndhra %radesh
http6<<sites.google.com<site<eclarionofdalit<persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-
puttaparthi-ap

+. how many 8udges are caught Dy authorities for doing
improper 9 immoral & illegal acts 9 since independence till date # what
action taken in each case #
*2. what action taken against copy cat 8udges caught red handed
while copying in puDlic eGamination in $ndhra %radesh #
**. haEe you reEiewed all the preEious 8udicial decisions taken
Dy such 8udges of douDtful integrity & honesty #
*1. is it not the duty of goEernment & supreme court of 0ndia 9 to
protect the fundamental rights & human rights of all 0ndian citiOens #
*-. why the goEernment & supreme court of 0ndia has failed to
protect the fundamental rights & human rights of me & those
mentioned in my complaint #
*;. how many former )J0s 9 supreme court & high court 8udges
haEe disproportionate wealth #
*3. Aour denial of information to my preEious (/0 reFuests
amounts to suppression of eEidence 9 hiding crimes 9 what action against
erring puDlic serEants #
*:. why my preEious (/0 reFuests or part there of was not
transferred to appropriate authorities and information giEen to me in a
consolidated form #

4ain ! 6
I*. ?hy not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in
lock-up < fake encounters #
I1. ?hy not death sentence to corrupt police who apply -rd degree
torture on prisoners #
I-. ?hy not death sentence to corrupt police 9 who conniEe with
criminals & DackstaDs our motherland 9 itHs national security #
I;. DonHt the police haEe suo-motto powers to take action in the interest
of puDlic welfare 9 law & order #
I3. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds Dy police 9 puDlic
serEants 9 industrialists 9 etc in the media . /hen why not police taking
any action with respect to them #
I:. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams 9 scandals Dy
constitutional functionaries 9 puDlic serEants in the media. 0nstead of
wasting money 9 killing time Dy prolonging formation of parliamentary
committees 9 8udicial commissions 9 why not suD8ect those accussed
puDlic serEants to narco analysis 9 lie deector test 9 etc to ascertain truth
& proEide timely 8ustice #
I=. 0f a commonman files a complaint 9 police < courts wants eEidences 9
witnesses to take action against the rich & mighty crooks. ?here as if a
rich person 8ust giEes a complaint against a poor chap 9 he is arrested 9
tortured eEenthough there are no eEidences 9 witnesses. ?hy this douDle
standard #
IK. 0f a poor chap tries to collect eEidences as per his fundamental rights
or as per (/0 $)/ 9 the puDlic serEants donHt giEe full 9 truthfull
information. Still 9 police < courts donHt take action against those puDlic
serEants hiding crimes. ?hy #
I+.why 0 was not permitted to appear as an Mamicus curieN Defore 8ain
commission of enFuiry or supreme court of india proDing late prime
minister ra8iE andhi assassination case #
I*2. /he criminal neGus tried to silence me 9 Dy closing my news paper 9
Dy snatching away my 8oD oppurtunities in goEernment serEice9 Dy
physically assaulting me 9 Dy threatening me of false fiG-ups in cases & Dy
attempts to murder me. "ut no action against culprits 9 why #
I**. ?hereas 9 0 was enFuired numDer of times Dy police & intelligence
personnel aDout this case 9 Dut the culprits were not enFuired eEen
once 9 why #
I*1.who compensates the losses 0 haEe suffered due to these in8ustices #
are not police responsiDle for it #
I*-. 0s it not the duty of police to protect the liEes 9 liEelihood of
witnesses & all parties inEolEed 9 Doth during case & afterwards #
I*;. 7ow do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in
their familyHs wealth year after year #
I*3. ?hile getting appointed into goEernment serEice from the rank of
peon to 0$S officer 9 police Eerification is mandatory. ?hile appointing to
sensitiEe defense estaDlishments 9 research institutes in addition to
police Eerification 9 central intelligence agencies cross-check candidateHs
Dackground. 7oweEer is there no Dackground checks of constitutional
functionaries 9 4%s 9 4&$s 9 9 who are priEy to national secrets # why #
I*:. (ecently 9 the opposition parties haEe made allegations during
presidential allegations that close relatiEe of one of the front running
candidates haEe swindled puDlic money Dy their Dank 9 misused puDlic
money through one of their 'O. 0s it true #
I*=.has O0 funded any terrorist outfits in india or aDroad #
I*K.india preaches non-Eiolence 9 panchasheel principles to the world.
0n india 9 more than half the population are poor 9 people are starEing to
death. 0nspite these Dackground 9 O0 funded & aided terrorist outfits in
former east %akistan ensuring the creation of "angladesh 9 O0 has
funded & aided terrorist outfits like &//! 9 /U&F 9 !/) in srilanka 9 4I4
in %akistan. 0n turn these terrorist outfits haEe murdered thousands of
innocents in those countries. $re these acts of O0 8ust & legal # 0s not
O0 responsiDle for all those murders of innocents # has O0 paid any
compensation to those Eictims or their family meDers # why not #
I*+.within india 9 to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups 9
O0 has funded & aided couter terrorist groups 9 is it right & legal #
I12. 0n Jharkhand 9 chattisgarh 9 etc 9 the goEernment has armed 9
trained & funded Msalwa 8udumN to counter naGalites. Salwa 8udum
cadres are terroriOing innocents 8ust like naGalites. 0s this action of
goEernment 8ust & legal #
I1*.in india9 /$D$ 9 %O/$ is Deing rampantly misused Dy police. !Een
where there are no proDlems of terrorism 9 /$D$ < %O/$ is Deing slapped
against innocents 9 eEen children. 0n 4.4.7ills of 5arnataka state 9 S/F
personnel charged triDal people with /$D$ on friEolous charges of taking
lunch to Eeerappan 9 stiching dress for the forest Drigand9 etc. where as
the prominent political9 film 9 sports personalities who haEe links with
underworld 9 anti national elements & attended parties hosted Dy
dawood 0Drahim 9 other dons in gulf countries 9 else where. "ut these hi-
fi people are not charged with /$D$ < %O/$ # why #
I11. Film actor san8ay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully
knowing well the criminal oD8ectiEes of criminals 9 hid the dangerous
arms & ammunition in his home 9 which were intended for terroriOing
puDlic. 7oweEer mr.dutt is not charged with /$D$ < %O/$ instead he is
charged with illegal possession of arms act , which is normally applied to
farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals 9 Dirds in
their farms .. ?hy this faEouraDle treatment of mr.dutt Dy police #
prosecution # is this Decause dutt is politically mighty & rich #
I1-. &aw is one & same for all 9 the puDlic serEants9 police interpretes 9
enforces it differentially Detween rich & poor # why this differentiation #
I1;.recently in "angalore police naDDed criminals Delonging to
international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia moDiles. !Eery
nokia moDile comes with *3 digit 04!0 numDer 9 this numDer is also used
Dy police for tracking criminals. 0n consumer dispute at consumer
disputes redressal forum 4ysore )D ;+<23 9 nokia company stated that all
itHs products come with 04!0 numDer only & stated that the product in
dispute sold Dy tata indicom dealer 4<S 0'/O/O )O44U'0)$/0O'S 9
4ysore are not theirHs as it doesnHt haEe 04!0 numDers. Further nokia
stated they donHt haEe any Dusiness relationship with either tata indicom
or itHs dealer. 7oweEer the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his
products are genuine 9 first hand products 9 Dut doesnHt haEe 04!0
numDers . this proEes the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling
illegal nokia moDile hand sets & cheating the puDlic. /hese moDiles are
eEading taGes 9 as well as these are without 04!0 numDers Dest Duy for
criminal elements who want to eEade police tracking. ?hat police are
doing
I13. ?ho 9 of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to
close a case ie to file M"N report 9 when after certain time limit no leads
are found in inEestigation #
I1:. 7ow do you monitor corrupt police personnel 9 who purposefully
fail to inEestigate case properly 9 so that either the case can De closed
with M"N report or the prosecution fails to proEe the case in court #
I1=. ?ho among police takes the decision to appeal against the Eerdict
of a lower court 9 when the prosecution fails #
I1K. ?ho took the decision 9 not to appeal against the argentina court
order acFuitting mr.Fuatrochi accussed in Dofors scandal #
I1+. Do you treat all the prison conEicts same in the prison or does the
notorious Dig time rich criminals get spacious Darracks with tE9 news
paper 9 adeFuate food 9 medical care 9 etc while small time criminals 9
poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with :2-=2 inmates without any
Dasic reFuirements #
I-2. ?hat is the status of my complaint made to the D & 0 of police 9
goEernment of 5arnataka on *2<*1<122; # the copies of complaint was
released at press meet at patrakartara DhaEan 4ysore on same day9 eEen
copies were giEen to police & intelligence personnel #
I-*. ?hy no action 9 reply regarding the complaint till date #
I-1. Our constitutional frame workers gaEe legal immunity priEileges to
certain constitutional functionaries 9 so that they are not Durdened with
friEolous court cases & can concentrate on their constitutional duties.
"ut these priEileges doesnHt coEer the indiEidual actions of those puDlic
serEants like rape 9 murder 9 dowry harassment 9 taG eEasion 9 misuse of
office 9 etc. Dut still law enforcement < police department is Dound to
send reFuest to home ministry seeking permission & home ministry sits
oEer files for months. /his giEes the accussed ample time to destroy
eEidences. 0s it right & legal #
I--. Does legal immunity priEileges coEer their official actions alone # if
not what does it coEer #
I-;. ?hat is the time limit for home ministry to giEe sanction for the
prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries #
I-3. 7ow many present 4%s 9 4&$s 9 4U'0)0$%$& )O(%O($/O(S 9 other
peopleHs representatiEes are facing criminal charges #
I-:. 0n the past 9 how many 4%s 9 4&$s 9 corporators were facing
criminal charges 9 yearwise since *+K= # how many of them were
eEentually conEicted #
I-=. 7ow many 4%s 9 4&$s 9 prominent film 9 sports personalities haEe
haEe contacts with underworld 9 foreign intelligence agencies #
I-K. 7ow many of them haEe attended freFuent parties hosted Dy
underworld dons in gulf countries 9 else where #
I-+. 7ow many 4% 9 4&$ 9 other peopleHs representatiEes are wanted Dy
police in Earious cases . Dut shown in the police records as aDsconding
Dut in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual #
I;2. ?hen did smt. Sonia andhi Decame a citiOen of india # did she
occupy any puDlic office Defore naturaliOation #
I;*. 0n india 9 how many 4%s 9 4&$s 9 4&)s are of foreign origin or haEe
a spouse of foreign origin #
I;1. Does smt. Sonia andhi haEe citiOenship of any other country #
I;-. Did she occupy any puDlic office while en8oying dual citiOenship #
I;;. 7ow do you monitor puDlic serEants who haEe spouses of foreign
origin & while they are on foreign tour 9 from national security
perspectiEe #
I;3. 0s mr. 4.S SU""$ memDer of parliament a citiOen of india #
I;:. ?hat is the status of complaint made Dy former union minister
mr.suDramanya swamy alleging that late %.4 ra8iE gandhiHs family
receiEed money from foreign intelligence agencies #
I;=. 0n many cases like mass riots inEolEing certain political parties 9
when that culprit party comes to power all the cases inEolEing itHs
partymen are withdrawn Dy the goEernment orelse prosecution fails to
proEe itHs case & prefers not to appeal. Just rememDer "omDay riot case
inEolEing shiE sainiks & others 9 when shiE sena B "J% came to power in
4aharashtra 9 all the cases against itHs partymen were withdrawn. $re
these type of decisions Dy goEernment 8ust & legal #
I;K.what damages has Deen done to indiaHs national security due to mole
in the %4O9 as alleged Dy former union minister mr.natwar singh #
I;+. ?hat action Dy the goEernment #
I32. 7ow many 0ndians are in the custody of police < military in Earious
foreign countries #
I3*. 7ow many foreigners are there in 0ndian prisons #
I31. 7ow O0 is protecting the human rights of these prisoners #
I3-. 0s the goEernment paying any compensation to Eictims of police
failures 9 fiG-ups 9 9 who suffer in 8ail for years & acFuitted Dy courts
upon finding them as not guilty #
I3;. Do you register murder charges < attempt to murder charges against
guilty police officers who are responsiDle for lock-up deaths 9 fake
encounters & -rd degree torture #
I33. 7ow many cases has Deen filed since *+K= till date #
I3:. ?hat action has Deen taken against guilty police officers 9 S/F
personnel who were responsiDle for gross human rights Eiolations 9
-rddegree torture 9 lock-up deaths of innocents in forest Drigand
EeerappanHs territory 9 Dased on 8ustice $.J.SadashiEa commission
findings # if not why #
I3=. 0 9 as a citiOen of india as my Mfundamental dutyN hereDy do offer
my conditional serEices to O0 & O5 to apprehend corrupt puDlic
serEants. $re you ready to utiliOe my serEices #
I3K. %olice personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes 9
mass fury 9 riots 9 etc. they suffer more & eEen their family memDers
suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the goEernment proEide
insurance coEerage to police & their family memDers on the lines of
defense forces #
I3+. ?hat is the amount of coEerage to a police constaDle & his family #
I:2. ?ho makes the premium contriDutions #
I:*. Do the goEernment proEide oEertime allowance 9 food allowance to
police who daily work Deyond K hours of duty #
I:1. 0s the goEernment giEing any training to police personnel in puDlic
interaction 9 human rights #
I:-. 0s it right to post professionally trained police to sentry 9 orderly
duties of ministers #
I:;. ?hat is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india
since *+K= #
I:3. 0S /7! OV!('4!'/ 0V0' $D!IU$/! FOOD9 4!D0)$& )$(! 9
)&O/70' 9 &0V0' S%$)! /O %(0SO' 0'4$/!S 9 $S (!IU0(!D "A $
'O(4$& 7U4$' !0' $))O(D0' /O ?.7.O 'O(4S #
I::. 0s the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis 9
lie-detector test 9 etc under the control of police department #
I:=. 0s it not right to put it under impartial control of '7() or like
Dodies #
I:K. 0s the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings
& suDtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the
conseFuences 9 is it right & legal # this happens mostly in real estate
matters.
I:+. Did goEernment make any ransom payments to forest Drigand
Eeerappan during his Earious kidnappings #
I=2. ?hat action has Deen taken Dased on reEealations Dy karim telgi
during narco analysis aDout puDlic serEants inEolEement #
I=*. 7ow many cases of allegations against 8udges were made in the
media aDout misuse of office 9 criminal acts Dy 8udges from munsiff court
to supreme court of 0ndia # since *+;= till date
I=1. are the enFuiry report findings9 action taken reports of such cases
accessiDle to puDlic # if not why #
I=-. what action has Deen taken against guilty 8udges #
I=;. are the guilty 8udges legally prosecuted in all such cases # or has it
8ust ended with their resignation from serEices or his superior 8udge not
allotting him any 8udicial work #
I=3. why some high ranking 8udges are not legally prosecuted for their
wrong doings #
I=:. are 8udges aDoEe law # are not eEeryDody eFual Defore law #
I==. do the 8udiciary suD8ect 9 all the cases handled Dy accussed <
tainted 9 guilty 8udges to reEiew 9 to undo past un8ust 8udgements #
I=K. how # if not why #
I=+. how do the 8udiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some 8udges
including the wealth in the name of 8udgeHs family memDers #
IK2. do all the 8udges file their annual income 9 wealth statements on
sworn affidaEits to the higher 8udiciary # defaulters how many #
IK*. how does the 8udiciary Eerifies those statements #
IK1. is such statements made puDlic 9 on weD #
IK-. when the 8udgement of a lower court is turned down Dy the higher
court 9 what action is initiated against lower court 8udge for making
un8ust 8udgement & meating out in8ustice #
IK;. when allegations of corruption 9 misuse of office 9 etc against 8udges
are made 9 why the accussed B 8udges are not suD8ected to tests like
Mpoly graph 9 lie detector 9 Drain mapping 9 etcN 9 in the interest of
8ustice & truth #
IK3. 8udges are not employees of goEernment 9 so they are ineligiDle to
De the memDers of M5arnataka state goEernment 8udicial department
house Duilding co-operatiEe societyN. /hen how come 9 many 8udges
including supreme court 8udges are admitted as memDers of this society
& allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few
thousands Dy the said society at said societyHs B 8udicial layout 9
yelahanka 9 "angalore # while the ordinary memDers like peons 9 clerks in
8udicial department are waiting for a site since years 9 is not the whole
thing grossly illegal #
IK:. in more than =2P of cases Defore all courts in 0ndia 9 central
goEernment or state goEernment or goEernment agency is one of the
parties. 7ow many 8udges or their family memDers 9 haEe receiEed out of
turn 9 faEouraDle allotments of sites 9 gas agency 9 petrol pumps 9 etc Dy
the goEernment # is not such allotments illegal # what action #
IK=. when a person under police custody or 8udicial custody suffer
-rd degree torture Dy police 9 is not the 8udge of the respectiEe court
which is handling that tortured personHs case responsiDle for it #
IKK. has the higher 8udiciary legally prosecuted respectiEe 8udges & the
police officers for committing -rd degree torture 9 on charges of attempt
to murder & murder # if not why #
IK+. registrar 9 4ysore district & sessions court 9 has called for the
candidatures to Earious Eacancies in that court from the puDlic Eide
notification no 6 $D4'<$<*2K13<122- dated *+<**<122-. %lease furnish
me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit
ranking for the post of peon.
I+2. registrar 9 "angalore city ciEil court 9 has called for the
candidatures to Earious Eacancies in that court from the puDlic Eide
notification no 6 $D4-0,$.;11<2- dated *+<23<122-. %lease furnish me
merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
I+*. when a person doesnHt get adeFuate food 9 medical care while
under police custody or 8udicial custody 9 is not the respectiEe 8udge
dealing that personHs case responsiDle for it # what action #
I+1. how 8udiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners #
I+-. numerous accussed persons are suffering in 8ail under 8udicial
custody 9 for periods far eGceeding the legally stipulated sentence
periods. For eGample 6 a pick-pocketer is in 8ail for one year 9 the 8udge
finds him guilty of offence & giEes him - months sentence. ?hat aDout
the eGcess punishment of + months. 0s not the 8udge responsiDle for the
illegal 9 eGcess punishment of the conEict # what action against the 8udge
in such cases #
I+;. numerous innocents suffer in 8ail for years & finally the 8udge finds
them as innocents & acFuits them of the charges. ?hat aDout the prison
sentence 9 the innocent has already serEed # is not the 8udge responsiDle
for this illegal 9 un8ust punishment to an innocent # remedy # what action
against the 8udge #
I+3. does the priEileges of 8udges coEer Doth their official actions & the
actions arising out of misuse of office #
I+:. does the priEileges of 8udges coEer Doth their official actions as
8udges & their personal actions as indiEiduals #
I+=. are the fundamental rights of citiOens supreme or the priEileges of
8udges 9 constitutional functionaries supreme #
I+K. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of 8udges #
I++. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of adEocates from
Dar 9 as the 8udges #
I*22. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired 8udges 9 as
goEernors of states 9 memDers or as chairman of commissions 9 etc #
I*2*. how many 8udges Delonging to oppressed classes B scheduled
caste 9 scheduled triDe 9 other Dackward classes 9 minorities & women
are their in supreme court 9 state high courts & suDordinate courts #
kindly proEide specific figures .
I*21. what are the legal measures enforced Dy 8udiciary 9 to enforce the
accountaDility of 8udges & to check corruption in 8udiciary #
I*2-. are not these measures a failure 9 looking at present state of
affairs of 8udiciary #
I*2;. does the 8udges arrange for distriDution of alchoholic drinks at the
official meetings 9 parties 9 at the taG payerHs eGpense #
I*23. does any 8udges haEe included their consumption of alchoholic
drinks 9 in their hotel Dill & claimed traEeling allowance #
I*2:. what action has Deen taken against B selectors ie 5arnataka high
court 8udges & newly selected women 8udges inEolEed in roost resort
scandal in 4ysore 9 5arnataka #
I*2=. when common people < taG payers & eEen goEernment employees
are not getting proper health care from goEernment at goEernment
hospitals. 0s it right & 8ust to proEide premium health care to 8udges 9
constitutional functionaries at 3-star priEate hospitals in 0ndia 9 aDroad 9
all at taG payerHs eGpense #
I*2K. are the 8udges suD8ected to periodical health check-ups to
ascertain their health 9 mental faculties & mental Dalance in the midst of
all work pressures 9 emotional tensions #
I*2+. what is the criteria adopted Dy 8udiciary for accepting applications
seeking puDlic interest litigations #
I**2. why numerous appeals for %0& Dy me 9 were not considered #
I***. what is the criteria adopted Dy 8udiciary 9 for appointing Mamicus
curieN in a case #
I**1. why my appeal to honouraDle supreme court 9 to make me as an
Mamicus curieN in late %.4 (a8iE andhiHs assassination case 9 was not
considered Dy the court #
I**-. what is the criteria adopted Dy 8udiciary 9 for initiating suo-motto
action #
I**;. numerous cases of in8ustices are reported in the media daily 9 with
supporting eEidences . why not the 8udiciary take suo-motto action in all
such cases #
I**3. legal aid Doards pre-8udge the cases in the name of taking legal
opinion 9 Defore proEiding legal aid to the needy # is it not needy
personHs rights Eiolation #
I**:. is not the safety of witnesses 9 parties in cases responsiDility of the
court 9 Doth during hearing of the case & afterwards #
I**=. is the use of -rd degree torture Dy police on prisoners 9 during the
police custody < 8udicial custody < prison sentence right # what action #
I**K. when the corrupt police officer & goEernment prosecution
adEocate together coEer-up eEidences 9 conducts improper inEestigation
intentionally to fail the case B to coEer-up rich crooks 9 high & mighty
people 9 what action 8udge takes in such cases #
I**+. how does the 8udiciary monitor the wealth growth of police 9
goEernment adEoctes 9 taG officials 9 officials of licensing authorities 9 to
ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against rich & mighty #
I*12. what are the status of appeals made Dy human rights actiEist
'$$($J.4.(. to the honouraDle supreme court of 0ndia #
I*1*. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to Fuasi-8udicial
positions like district < taluk magistrates 9 taG officers 9 reEenue officers 9
land acFuisition officers 9 etc. how the 8udiciary monitors oEer their
Fuasi-8udicial actions #
I*11. suD8ect to conditions 9 0 9 '$$($J.4.(. 9 editor 9 e-Eoice of
human rights watch 9 do offer my free serEices to honouraDle supreme
court of 0ndia 9 to apprehend corrupt 8udges 9 are you B the honouraDle
court ready to utiliOe it #
I*1-. what are the status of my appeals 9 sent to the honouraDle
supreme court of 0ndia 9 through goEernment of indiaHs on-line grieEance
system , D% & D$(% . 6
D%<4<122:<K222K 9 D$(%<!<122:<2223=9 D$(%<!<122:<22113 9
D%<4<122:<K221* 9 D$(%<!<122:<2213- 9 D%<4<122:<K22-1 9
D$(%<!<122:<2**;+ 9 D%<4<122:<K22;= 9 D$(%<!<122:<2**:; 9
D%<4<122:<K22;- 9 D%<4<122:<K22K3 9 D$(%<!<122:<2:=2; 9
D$(%<!<122:<2=2*= 9 D$(%<!<122:<2=2*K 9 D%<4<122:<K2*3+ 9
D%<4<122:<K2*:1 9 D$(%<!<122:<2=K:; 9 D%<4<122:<K2*:3 9
D$(%<!<122:<2=K== 9 D%<4<122:<K2*:= 9 D$(%<!<122:<2K21K 9
D$(%<!<122:<2K21+ 9 D$(%<!<122:<2K2-1 9 D$(%<!<122:<2K2;- 9
D$(%<!<122:<2K2;; 9 D%<4<122:<K2*=; 9 D%<4<122:<K2*+- 9
D$(%<!<122=<222;; 9 D%<4<122=<K222- 9 D%<4<122=<K22*2 9
D$(%<!<122=<22*:; 9 D$(%<!<122=<22*:3 9 D%<4<122=<K22*; 9
D%<4<122=<K2213 9 D%<4<122=<K22;+ 9 D%<4<122=<K2233 9
D%<4<122=<K223: 9 D%<4<122=<K22=K 9 D%<4<122=<K22K1 9
D$(%<!<122=<21:*K
I*1;. the appeals made to the honouraDle supreme court of 0ndia 9
copies of which are aEailaDle at following weD pages
http6<<groups.yahoo.com<group<naghrw<message<*K1 9
http6<<groups.yahoo.com<group<naghrw<message<12: 9
http6<<groups.yahoo.com<group<naghrw<message<12K 9
http6<<groups.yahoo.com<group<naghrw<message<1*1 9
http6<<groups.yahoo.com<group<naghrw<message<12+ 9
http6<<groups.yahoo.com<group<naghrw
what are the status of those appeals #
I*13. in the media 9 we haEe seen reports aDout 8udges committing
crimes B rape 9 attempt to murder 9 swindling goEernment money 9
untouchaDility practice 9 the disrespect to national flag 9 sale of 8udicial
orders 9 Dail 9 receipt of monetary gains Dy way of royalty for Dooks 9
prime real estate purchase at discounted rate 9 taking round aDout long
foreign tours along with family in the name of official work 9 etc. Dy this
way 9 8udges themselEes are making contempt of court 9 constitution of
0ndia & citiOens of 0ndia. 7ow you are protecting the honour of the
8udiciary 9 constitution of 0ndia & citiOens of 0ndia # please answer.
I*1:. 0s the goEernment giEing any facilities < affirmatiEe actions to
policemenHs family as Deing giEen to defense personnel 9 eG-serEicemen
& their families 9 like preferential site allotment 9 lpg agency 9 ration
depot 9 reserEation in college admission 9 soft Dank loans 9 etc #
I*1:. if not 9 why # after all 9 the contriDution of police to national
security is on par with defense forces.
I*1=. is not some high police officials addressing their suDordinates in
singular term 9 aDusing them with Eulgar words wrong #
I*1K. is not some police personnel calling puDlic with singular term9
aDusing puDlic with Eulgar words wrong #
I*1+. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health9 liEes
of prison in-mates #
I*-2.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged
an innocent person of criminal acts 9 resulting in his confinement in 8ail 9
finally acFuitted Dy court as found to De innocent #
I*-*. is it not right to with hold salary 9 gratuity 9 pension to such guilty
police personnel & pay it as compensation to Eictims of police failures &
atrocities #
I*-1. does our 0ndian constitution legally permit a citiOen of foreign
origin naturaliOed Dy marriage to an 0ndian or naturaliOed Dy option 9 to
occupy any constitutional office #
I*--. during Dritish rule in india & Earious other Dritish colonies 9
criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in 0ndia & other
Dritish colonies. $fter indiaHs independence what happened to those
cases # did our 0ndian goEernment close all such cases or did it continue
with the prosecution #
I*-;. in how many cases O0 & other state goEernment continued with
the prosecution $$0'S/ OU( F(!!DO4 F07/!(S # why #
I*-3. what aDout the status of cases against shri.neta8i suDash )handra
Dose #
I*-:. has O0 deported any freedom fighters to "ritain or itHs colonies 9
to face prosecution after 0ndia gained independence # 7$S O0 (!)!0V!D
$'A (!IU!S/ F(O4 "(0/$0' /O /7$/ !FF!)/ # if yes 9 why 9 whom #
I.*-=. the honouraDle supreme court of 0ndia failed proEide information
to me as per my (/0 reFuest appeal no 6 +* < 122= in response to your
letter no 6 F* < (/0 < $.+* < 122= dt *-.*1.2= 9 why #
I*-K . the honouraDle union home secretary failed to giEe me
information as per my rti reFuest 9 he transferred my application to
others 9 in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally 9
complete truthful information was not giEen 9 why # as the union home
secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred (/0
application 9 will he send me a consolidated reply to my present (/0
reFuest #
I*-+. in a high profile case Defore the honouraDle delhi high court 9 we
haEe seen how defense adEocate mr. (.S.$'$'D & prosecution adEocate
mr. 0.U.57$' made a secret pact to win the case in faEour of rich
criminal 9 totally manipulating prosecution witnesses 9 eEidences &
prosecution stand 9 totally making mockery of 8ustice system . how you
are ensuring the deliEery of 8ustice 9 there Deing numerous such
adEocates in practice #
I*;2. Smt. Sonia andhi is person of foreign origin 9 she wields
enormous clout more than the %rime 4inister himself oEer the
goEernment of 0ndia Deing the chair person of U%$. 0s she legally
permitted to summon confidential official records 9 minutes of the
caDinet 9 to hold the caDinet meeting of union ministers #
I*;*. $s per law 9 is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like
prime minister of 0ndia or president of 0ndia 9 etc #
I.*;1. ?hat are the fundamental rights of a citiOen guaranteed under
the constitution ,$rticle 1*. #
I*;-. ?hat are the priEileges conferred on legislators &
parliamentarians Dy the constitution of 0ndia#
a. 0nside the 7ouse D. Outside the 7ouse
I*;;. ?hat are priEileges conferred on constitutional functionaries9 like
a. %resident of 0ndia D. %rime 4inister of 0ndia
c. )hief Justice of 0ndia d. )hairman of '7()
e. )entral Vigilance )ommissioners.
I*;3. $re the priEileges legal immunity conferred on aDoEe mentioned
constitutional functionaries #
a. )oEer all their official actions irrespectiEe of merit.
D. )oEer Doth their official & personal actions.
I*;:. $re the priEileges defined & codified #
I*;=. $re these priEileges aDoEe freedom of the press #
I*;K. $re the liDerty & fundamental rights of the citiOens guaranteed Dy
the constitution9 aDoEe the priEileges of the constitutional functionaries
or eFual or Delow #
I*;+. )an the 0ndian legislatures & parliament De eFuated to the 7ouse
of commons in !ngland which is considered to De a superior court and
court of records #
I*32. )an the diEision of powers9 namely the legislature9 the eGecutiEe
and the Judiciary9 De eFuated to the functioning of the 7ouse of
commons and 7ouse of &ords in !ngland #
I*3*. )an a citiOen De said to haEe committed Dreach of priEilege of the
7ouse or court and causing contempt of the house or court Dy raising the
issues of accountaDility of constitutional functionaries #
I*31. )an a &egislature or %arliament enact a new law9 to circumEent or
to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings Dy peoples
representatiEes & eGecutiEe # does not it amount to infringement of
Judicial powers & contempt of the court Dy the 7ouse.
I*3-. $re the FU'D$4!'/$& DU/0!S of a citiOen more important than
constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or eFual in
importance to it #
I*3;. )an a constitutional functionary commit crimes9 anti-national
actiEities in the name of constitutional duties9 Dehind the legal Eeil of
officialHs secret act & go unaccountaDle for his actions and go unpunished
Dy his legal immunity priEileges
I*33. $re the &egislators memDers of parliament9 7igh court & Supreme
court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify
their priEileges for the reason that if codified their priEileges would De
curtailed and their action would De suD8ected to legal scrutiny. #
I*3:. "y Eotes of citiOens &egislators and parliamentarians get seats in
the legislature and %arliament out of taG payerHs money9 they get their
pay9 perks & lead 3-Star luGurious lifestyles. 7ence whether a Eote of a
citiOen is aDoEe ,4ore Ealid. or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is
aDoEe or more Ealid in a democracy #
I*3=. Judges & )onstitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed Dy
Eoters < taG payers. Out of taG payers money9 they get their pay9 perks &
lead 3-star luGurious lifestyles. 7ence9 whether the Eote of a citiOen9
fundamental duties of a taG payer is aDoEe ,more Ealid. or a seat of 8udge
< constitutional functionary is aDoEe ,more
Ealid. in a democracy #
I*3K. 0f there is a Eacuum in the &egislature or parliament9 who is to fill
up that Eacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts
proEide a solution Dy performing its role Dy enacting proper legislation to
coEer the field ,Eacuum. #
I*3+. ?hile it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to De a Judge
in his own cause9 is it not worse for the memDers of the legislature and
parliament to De 8udges in their own cause #
I*:2. $re the /echnicalities of the case more important to a 8udge or
Justice to a citiOen9 protection of fundamental rights of citiOen.#
I*:*. ?hy not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action
with respect to numerous cases of in8ustices reported in 4edia #
I*:1. ?hy not the Judges admit Earious cases of 0n8ustices affecting
puDlic9 as the %uDlic 0nterest &itigationN # 0n some cases9 the %uDlic or
the person representing them is unaDle to afford the high cost of the
case. ?hy not free legal aid is giEen #.
I*:-. ?hat is the criteria for admitting a %.0.&. & giEing free legal aid #
I*:;. )ommunication B free flow of information is the lifeline of a
democracy. ?hy the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the
(ight to 0nformation of )itiOens #
I*:3. (ecently 9 while assuming office as honouraDle chief 8ustice of
5arnataka 9 8ustice. %.D.D0'$5$( 9 gaEe a Dlanket withdrawal of all
internal departmental enFuiries against approGimately 122 8udges 9 is it
8ust & legal # giEe me the names of accused 8udges & description of
charges against them #
I*::. does it not show that 8udges are more eFual than others #
I*:=. who are inEolEed in %F scam # what action against guilty 8udges #
I*:K. ?hy you did not giEe information to me as per (/0 $ct inspite of
appeal # refer. F*<(/0<$+*<122=.
I*:+. $lmost a year ago 9 in the 5arnataka state new chief 8ustice of
5arnataka high court honDle 4r.Dinakar ,now eleEated to supreme court
of 0ndia. 8ust on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary
inFuiry proceedings against 122U erring 8udges. 0n such a short time no
human Deing can study all the cases in detail 9 then how come he arriEed
at this Eital decision in such short time# ?ho are those 122U 8udges
facing enFuiry #
I*=2 .(ecently in the 5arnataka state 9 high court found out that a
district 8udge without conducting hearings properly 9 entering fictious
dates of hearings ,which happens to De goEernment holidays . facilitated
in eGonerating a top politician . has the court enFuired into the preEious
8udgements of the accussed 8udge # did it find any wrongdoings#
I*=*. $s per law 9 while on duty a person should not De drunk 9 under
the influence of alchohol 9 as it limits the functioning of his senses &
Drain. /hat is why the acts & sayings of drunkards 9 committed < said
when they are drunk are not taken seriously. 7oweEer most of the police
officers after eEening hours are drunk 9 in that state only they apprehend
many suspects & produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates
Defore magistrate during wee hours < night. Some of of the 8udges are
also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police & 8udges
work properly to do their respectiEe duties in identifying criminals 9
apprehending them & to issue 8udicial orders. $re these actions of police
& 8udges in drunken state legal #
I *=1 . ?hat action has Deen taken in Dhopal gas leak case against the
guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carDide
officials #
I *=- . ?hat action has Deen taken against guilty police officials 9
district magistrate 9 state ministers & central ministers who fully aided
the criminals B Union )arDide official 4r. $nderson to escape law 9 to
8ump Dail & flee the country without courtHs permission #
I *=; . ?hat action has Deen taken against the aDoEe said guilty with
respect to their contempt of court & for aiding a criminal to escape #
I *=3. ?hat action has Deen taken against the chief 8ustice of 0ndia 9
who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should De tried #
what action has Deen taken against the )J0 who Decame an official of
the trust Delonging to the criminal #
I *=: . ?hat action has Deen taken against the 0ndian %uDlic serEant who
decided to withdraw cases from US )ourts with respect to "hopal gas
tragedy #
I *== . ?hat action has Deen taken against the state laDour department
& pollution control Doard officials who haEe failed in their duties 9 inspite
of earlier warnings Dy 8ournalists #
I *=K . ?hat action has Deen taken against state caDinet ministers who
decided the Fuantum of compensation money to faEour the criminal
although they donHt haEe right to do so #
I *=+ . ?hat action has Deen taken against %residing Judge of the trial
court 9 )hief Justice of 0ndia 9 state police officials 9 puDlic prosecutors &
)entral "ureau of 0nEestigation officials who kept Fuite all along and
didnHt press for the eGtradition of the criminal 4r.$nderson 9 for
producing the criminal accussed no.* Defore the trial court #
I *K2 . 0s it not S7$4!FU& for the 8udiciary 9 police 9 goEernment
officials & peopleHs representatiEes who Decame part of Operation )rime
7ush Up & aided criminals responsiDle for ghastly murders of thousands
& maiming of lakhs of hapless puDlic in "hopal as &eak /ragedy#
I *K* . $re these )orrupt %olice 9 corrupt 8udges 9 corrupt ministers 9
corrupt laDour < pollution control Doard officials 7U4$' "!0'S #
I *K1 ?hy police are not registering my complaint against )J0 &
other VV0%S 9!Een after years #
I *K- donHt the police of Ei8ayanagar police station mysore haEe
legal 8urisdiction to register the case against these VV0%s # or 8ust
Decause the criminals happens to De VV0%s 9they are not Dooked Dy
police# 0f the said police donHt haEe legal 8urisdiction to Dook these
VV0%s 9 they should haEe transferred the complaint to those authorities
who haEe 8urisdiction & authority to Dook & prosecute these VV0%s 9
Dut not done so 9 why #
I *K; are not all these actions 9 of VV0%s & police amounting to coEer
up of crimes & criminals # are not these coEer ups itself is a crime #
I *K3. !Een an appeal for 8ustice Dy post card must De treated as %0& Dy
courts of 8ustice . howeEer my appeals for 8ustice concerning puDlic
welfare 9 national security sent through post 9 e-mail to supreme court
of india are not admitted as %uDlic interest litigation 9 why # does not
these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals 9 anti nationals#
I *K: $re not the honouraDle chief 8ustice of india together with the
8urisdictional police & (eEenue district magistrate responsiDle to
protect the fundamental & human rights of people # why the )J0 9
4ysore D) & Jurisdictional %olice haEe failed to protect the fundamental
& human rights of people including mine # For all the preEious in8ustices
0 haEe suffered at the hands of the criminal neGus 7onouraDle )J0 9
4ysore reEenue district magistrate & 8urisdictional police are together
responsiDle 9 if anything untoward happens to me or to my family
memDers or to my dependents the Fuartet B 7onouraDle )hief Justice of
0ndia 9 7onouraDle District 4agistrate 9 4ysore 9 7onouraDle %olice
)ommissioner of 4ysore city & )ircle 0nspector of police 9 Ei8ayanagar
police station 9 mysore will De responsiDle .
/hese corrupt parasites will feel 9 understand the pain only when they
also suffer in the same manner. &et us pray to almighty B 0n whose )ourt
of 8ustice 4$/)7 F0@0' is not there & eEery Dody is eFual 9 let us pray
to that god to giEe these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less
nothing more.

A!$( /O ?70)7 $"OV! %!(/$0'S 6 4$JO(0/A OF DO)U4!'/S %!(/$0'S
/O A!$( *++;-12*; . SO4! OF /7! DO)U4!'/S $(! D$/!D "$)5 /O
*+;=.

%U"&0) 0'FO(4$/0O' OFF0)!( ?7O F$0&!D /O 0V! FU&& 0'FO(4$/0O'6
)%0O 9 SU%(!4! )OU(/ OF 0'D0$ 9 '!? D!&70.

F!!S %$0D 6 0%O 11F 1K1K*; for rupees ten only

D$/! 6 1*.2:.12*; LLLLL..LLLLLLLLL'$$($J$.4.(.

%&$)! 6 4ASO(! 9 0'D0$L.. LLLLLLLLL., $%%&0)$'/.

LLLLLLLL..D!)&$($/0O'LLLLLLLLL

'ame 6 ...........................'$$($J$.4.(.
$ddress 6 ...................&0-1 < =:* 9 7UD)O F0(S/ S/$! 9 O%%
?$/!( ?O(5S OFF0)! 9 &$5S7405$'/$'$$( 9 7!""$& 9 4ASO(! -
3=22*= 0'D0$
%rofessional < /rade /itle 6 S.O.S - e B Voice For Justice
%eriodicity 6 ?!!5&A
)irculation 6 FO( F(!! D0S/(0"U/0O' O' ?!"
Donations 6 'O/ $))!%/!D. Self financing . 'eEer accepted any
donations 9 suDscriptions either for ourselEes or on Dehalf of other
organiOations < indiEiduals .
4onetary gains 6 nil 9 neEer made any monetary gain Dy way of
adEertisements on my weDsites or weD news paper or otherwise.
Owner<editor<printer<puDlisher 6 '$$($J$.4.(.
'ationality 6 0'D0$'
"ody Donation 6 %hysical "ody of 'agara8a 4 ( 9 !ditor 9 S.O.S- e B clarion
of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS 4edical )ollege 9
4ysore , Donation 'o. *:= dated 11 < *2 < 122- . 9 0n case of either
Unnatural death or 'atural Death at the hands of criminal neGus 9 my
Dody must De handed oEer to JSS 4edical )ollege 9 4ysore for the study
purposes of medical students.
!ye Donation 6 "oth !A!S of 'agara8a 4 ( 9 !ditor 9 S.O.S- e B clarion of
Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to 4ysore !ye "ank 9
4ysore 9 0n case of either Unnatural death or 'atural Death at the hands
of criminal neGus 9 my eyes must De handed oEer to 4ysore !ye "ank 9
4ysore ?0/70' : 7ours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.
7ome page 6
*tt+://i.grou+s.$a*oo.co"/grou+/sose1oice,orjustice/ 2
*tt+://grou+s.google.co.i/grou+/*r/e+a+er / 2 *tt+://sites.google.co"
/site/sose1oice,orjustice / 2 *tt+://e1oiceo,*u"arig*ts/atc*./ord+res
s.co" / 2 *tt+://ag*r/.tri+od.co"/e1oice/ 2
*tt+://e-1oiceo,*u"arig*ts/atc*.#logs+ot.co" 2 http://p$per.li/f-
1+8+=2,=
)ontact 6 naghrwV yahoo.com 9 nagara8hrwVhotmail.com 9

U0D $adhaar 'o 6 3=2- 3--+ -;=+
)ell 6 +* +-;*K12-*-
0 9'$$($J$.4.(. hereDy do declare that information giEen aDoEe are
true to the Dest of my knowledge & Delief. 0f i am repeatedly called to
police station or else where for the sake of inEestigations 9 the losses i do
incurr as a result like loss of wages 9 transportation 9 8oD 9 etc must De
Dorne Dy the goEernment. preEoiusly the police < 0" personnel repeatedly
called me the complainant ,sufferer of in8ustices. to police station for
Fuestioning 9 Dut neEer called the guilty culprits eEen once to police
station for Fuestioning 9 as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of
one sided Fuestioning must not De done Dy police or inEestigating
agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family memDers
like loss of 8oD 9 meeting with hit & run accidents 9 loss of liEes 9 death
due to improper medical care 9 etc 9 the 8urisdictional police 9 reEenue
officials 9 District 4agistrate & )hief Justice of 0ndia together with aDoEe
mentioned accused puDlic serEants will De responsiDle for it. !Een if
criminal neGus leEels fake charges 9 police file fake cases against me or
my dependents to silence me 9 this complaint is & will De effectiEe.
0f 0 or my family memDers or my dependents are denied our fundamental
rights 9 human rights 9 denied proper medical care for ourselEes 9 0f
anything untoward like hit & run cases 9 murder attempts 9 unnatural
deaths 9 etc happens to me or to my dependents or to my family
memDers - 0n such case )hief Justice of 0ndia together with the
8urisdictional reEenue & police officials will De responsiDle for it 9 in
such case the goEernment of india is liaDle to pay (s. /?O crore as
compensation to surEiEors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated
Dy the criminal neGus 9then that compensation money must De donated
to 0ndian $rmy ?elfare Fund. $fterwards 9 the money must De recoEered
Dy O0 as land arrears from the salary 9 pension 9 property 9 etc of guilty
police officials 9 guilty Judges 9 guilty puDlic serEants & guilty
)onstitutional fuctionaries.
date 6 1:.2K.12*;..LLLLLLLLL..AourQs sincerely9
place 6 0ndiaLLLLLLLLLL............'agara8a.4.(.

Edited2 +rited 2 +u#lis*ed o/ed #$ NA(ARA%A.M.R. G H 6I(-
2 No I612<&'98 5IR)4 )4A(E 2
8AA
!A4ER !8R.) 2 6AEMI.AN4ANA(AR 2 <E??A6
2M@)8RE F JI001I .ARNA4A.A
IN'IAD cell : 91 9341C20313 2 91 C9I031C202
7ome page 6
*tt+://i.grou+s.$a*oo.co"/grou+/sose1oice,orjustice/ 2
*tt+://grou+s.google.co.i/grou+/*r/e+a+er / 2
*tt+://sites.google.co"/site/sose1oice,orjustice / 2 *tt+://e1oiceo,*u"
arig*ts/atc*./ord+ress.co" / 2
*tt+://ag*r/.tri+od.co"/e1oice/ 2
*tt+://e-1oiceo,*u"arig*ts/atc*.#logs+ot.co" 2
http://p$per.li/f-1+8+=2,= *

9otact : ag*r/G$a*oo.co" 2 agaraj*r/G*ot"ail.co" 2
*tt+://///.a"est$.org/e/user/ag*r/
A Me"#er o, A"est$ Iteratioal

SUPREME COURT Judges Hiding Crime Information

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SUPREME COURT Judges Hiding Crime Information

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

S.O.

S e - Voice For Justice - e-news weekly

You might also like