Professional Documents
Culture Documents
) with 1/
being the
sampling rated. Then the spectrum sensing problem becomes
the following hypothesis test problem:
() =
{
1
: () +()
0
: ()
= 1, . . . , (1)
where
0
represents the hypothesis that the primary user
is idle and
1
represents the hypothesis that the primary
user is active. = 1, 2, . . . , index the -th signal sam-
ples with being the assigned sensing time. () is the
received signal by the secondary user with () denotes the
transmitted symbol by the primary user, and () is the
additive noise at the secondary user and is further modeled
as an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) circularly
symmetric complex Gaussian (CSCG) random variable with
zero mean and variance
2
, that is () (0,
2
) and
(),
() (0,
2
/2) where
() and
() represent
the real and imaginary components of the noise, respectively.
We also assume that () and () are independent of each
other.
978-1-4244-7555-1/10/$26.00 2010 IEEE
As to the detection performance of spectrum sensing algo-
rithm, there are two measurements: the detection probability
which
is the probability that the secondary user falsely announce the
presence of primary signal when the secondary user is actually
idle.
III. NEW AND EFFICIENT ENERGY DETECTOR
A. Conventional Energy Detector
The test statistic of the conventional energy detector under
complex Gaussian noise is dened as [7][9]
=
=1
()
2
2
=
=1
()
2
+
()
2
2
. (2)
And several kinds of distribution have been proposed to
approximate the distribution of the test statistic under
0
and
1
, respectively. Specically, under
0
the probability
density function (PDF) of can be approximated by the Chi-
square distribution with degrees of freedom or the Gaussian
distribution with mean and 2 variance. That is,
(
0
) =
(
0
) :
1
2
/2
(
2
)
2
1
exp
(
2
)
(
0
) :
1
4
exp
{
()
2
4
}
(3)
where () is the gamma function. On the other hand, under
1
the PDF of can be approximated by the non-central Chi-
square distribution with degrees of freedom and parameter
or the Gaussian distribution with (+) mean and 2(+2)
variance:
(
1
) =
(
1
) :
1
2
(
2
)exp(
2+
2
)
1
(
2)
(
1
) :
1
4(+2)
exp
{
()
2
4(+2)
}
(4)
where =
=1
()
2
2
is times the average SNR at
the output of the energy detector and
() is the th-order
modied Bessel function of the rst kind.
The decision rule of the energy detector is given by
0
(5)
where is the corresponding decision threshold. According to
the (3) and (4), the theoretical detection performance of the
conventional energy detector for a specic decision threshold
will be
= {
0
} =
{
:
(
2
,
2
)
(
2
)
: (
2
)
(6)
and
= {
1
} =
{
: 1 (, , )
: (
2(+2)
)
(7)
where () is the complementary cumulative distribution
function (CDF), i.e., () =
exp(
2
/2)/
2; and
() is the noncentral chi-square CDF, i.e., (, , ) =
=0
[
(
1
2
)
!
exp
2
](
2
+2
).
B. The Efcient Energy Detector
For the conventional energy detector, we nd that the theo-
retical detection probability is far from the actual one, which
implies that there is lack of accurate theoretical detection
performance expressions of the conventional energy detector
for the existing sensing optimizations under complex Gaussian
noise. To solve this problem and improve the detection perfor-
mance of the conventional energy detector, an efcient energy
detector is proposed in this paper with certain improvement
of the conventional energy detector. The test statistic of the
improved energy detector is
=1
()
2
2
/2
=
=1
()
2
2
/2
+
=1
()
2
2
/2
. (8)
As a result of the modication, under
0
,
0
) =
1
2
()
(1)
exp
(
2
)
. (9)
Also according to the central limit theorem when the number
of samples is large enough (e.g., 10 in practice), the test
statistic
0
) =
1
8
exp
{
2)
2
8
}
. (10)
Similarly, under
1
the test statistic
1
) =
1
8( + 2)
exp
{
2 2)
2
8( + 2)
}
.
(11)
In [10], Gamma distribution has been proposed to approximate
the distribution of the test statistic under
1
in the situation of
real signals. Here we extend this approximation to the situation
of complex signals. That is,
1
) =
1
()
(1)
exp
(
)
(12)
where = 2(1 +/) and = .
The decision rule of the improved energy detector is similar
to (5)
(13)
where
= {
0
} =
:
(,
2
)
()
: (
4
)
(14)
and
= {
1
} =
{
: (
22
4(+2)
)
: 1 (
, , )
(15)
where (, , ) =
0
1
()
(1)
exp(
) denotes the
CDF of a Gamma distribution with scale parameter and
shape parameter .
Note that although here we focus on the situation of AWGN
channel, the results (14) and (15) can be easily extended
to the fading channels. Specically, the detection probability
will be averaged over the particular statistics of the SNR ()
of the corresponding fading channel, while the false alarm
probability remains the same as a result of its independence
of the SNR of the channel.
IV. NUMERICAL RESULTS
In this section, we provide simulations to illustrate the
performance of the proposed energy detector, and compare
it with that of the conventional energy detector. Given the
target false alarm probability, the decision threshold can be
calculated according to the approximated distributions under
0
. Then the theoretical detection probability can be obtained
by using the approximated distributions and the corresponding
decision threshold. Note that the decision threshold can be
calculated according to the Chi-square CDF (
and
) or
the Gaussian CDF (
and
or ED:
), its actual
(New-ED:
of the
proposed energy detector using
(New-ED:
) is more
close to the target one than the conventional energy detectors.
These results conrm the accuracy of the proposed distribution
approximations of the test statistic of our efcient energy
detector under
0
, as well as the efciency of the proposed
theoretical false alarm probability expressions (14).
Match of the detection probability: Next, simulations are
conducted to investigate the match between the theoretical
detection probability and the actual detection probability of
the energy detectors. Here both
) and
) are
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
A
c
t
u
a
l
V
a
l
u
e
s
o
f
P
f
.
(a) Target Values of P
f
with N=10
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
A
c
t
u
a
l
V
a
l
u
e
s
o
f
P
f
.
(b) Target Values of P
f
with N=20
ED:
C
ED:
G
NewED:
C
NewED:
G
)
is used to calculate the theoretical detection probability based
on the previous ndings.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
b
o
.
(a) Target P
f
, SNR=10dB
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
b
o
.
(b) Target P
f
, SNR=6dB
Simu:
C
Simu:
G
Theo: P
d
Gau
Theo: P
d
Chi
Fig. 2. Comparison of the theoretical
to the simulated
of the
conventional energy detector with = 20.
Fig. 2 plots the theoretical and actual
of the conventional
energy detector versus the target
(Simu:
(Simu:
or Theo:
(Simu:
than that
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
b
o
.
(a) Target P
f
, SNR=10dB
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
b
o
.
(b) Target P
f
, SNR=6dB
Simu:
C
Simu:
G
Theo: P
d
Gau
Theo: P
d
Gam
Fig. 3. Comparison of the theoretical
to the simulated
of the proposed
energy detector with = 20.
using
(Simu:
the proposed
energy detector can make sure its actual
almost as same
as the target one, as displayed in Fig. 1. As to the accuracy
of the different theoretical expressions of
, it is easy to
see that the Gamma approximation (Theo:
) can match
very well with the actual detection performance. While the
values of the Gaussian approximation (Theo:
) deviate a
little from the actual detection performance. It means that the
theoretical expressions
in (14) and
in (15) should
be used for the design of spectrum sensing optimization.
Detection probability comparison: Fig.4 plots the simulated
and
around 0.2
which is almost three times of that of the conventional energy
detector. Fig.4-(b) shows the simulated
of different energy
detectors versus SNR with the same target
of 0.1. One
sees that obvious performance improvement can be achieved
by the proposed energy detector over the conventional energy
detector with about 1dB average gain. So the new energy
detector is of great superiority to the original energy detector
in terms of both the actual detection performance and the
accuracy and efciency of theoretical detection performance
expressions which are critical to the sensing optimization.
V. CONCLUSIONS
A new and efcient energy detector is proposed for spec-
trum sensing in cognitive radio under complex Gaussian noise,
as well as the theoretical expressions of its detection perfor-
mance. Series of simulations verify the efciency of the pro-
posed energy detector and its superiority to the conventional
one. That is, its theoretical detection performance can match
10
2
10
1
10
2
10
1
10
0
S
i
m
u
l
a
t
e
d
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
b
o
.
(a) Target P
f
SNR=10dB
10 8 6 4 2 0 2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
S
i
m
u
l
a
t
e
d
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
b
o
.
(b) SNR (dB) Target P
f
=0.1
ED: N=20
NewED: N=20
ED: N=50
NewED: N=50
Fig. 4. Actual
is
within certain realistic region. Some interesting extensions of
this work may include studying the sensing optimization based
on the new energy detector.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foun-
dation of China (60872024), the Cultivation Fund of the Key
Scientic and Technical Innovation Project (708059), Natural
Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No.Y2007G04),
open research fund of National Mobile Communications Re-
search Laboratory (W200802), and the State Key Lab. of
Integrated Services Networks (ISN9-03).
REFERENCES
[1] F. C. Commission, Spectrum policy task force, Rep. ET Docket, Tech.
Rep., Nov. 2002, no.02-135.
[2] S. Haykin, Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communica-
tions, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 201220,
Feb. 2005.
[3] V. Kostylev, Energy detection of a signal with random amplitude, in
Proc. ICC, New York, May 2002, pp. 16061610.
[4] F. Digham, M.-S. Alouini, and M. Simon, On the energy detection of
unkown signals over fading channels, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 55,
no. 1, pp. 2124, Jan. 2007.
[5] H.-S. Chen, W. Gao, and D. G. Daut, Signature based spectrum sensing
algorithms for ieee 802.22 WRAN, in IEEE Intern. Conf. Comm., Jun.
2007, pp. 64876492.
[6] S. Haykin, D. J. Thomson, and J. H. Reed, Spectrum sensing for
cognitive radio, Proc. IEEE, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 849877, May 2009.
[7] Z. Quan, S. Cui, and A. H. Sayed, Optimal linear cooperation for
spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks, IEEE J. Select. Signal
Processing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 2840, Feb. 2008.
[8] J. Shen, T. Jiang, S. Liu, and Z. Zhang, Maximum channel throughput
via cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks, IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 51665175, Oct. 2009.
[9] W. Zhang, R. Malik, and K. Letaief, Optimization of cooperative
spectrum sensing with energy detection in cognitive radio networks,
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 57615766, Dec.
2009.
[10] Y. Chen, Improved energy detector for random signals in gaussian
noise, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 558563, Feb.
2010.