Professional Documents
Culture Documents
=
6.0 10
30
2.0 10
17
= 3.0 10
13
m
3
Step 3 Now calculate the radius of the star using
V =
4
3
r
3
4
3
r
3
= 3.0 10
13
r =
3
3 3.0 10
13
4
1.9 10
4
m
The radius of the neutron star is about 19 km.
Compare this with the radius of our Sun, which is
700 000 km.
Worked example 1
hyperlink
destination
hyperlink
destination
Chapter 18: The nature of the universe
267
It is useful to remember that the distance to the Sun is
approximately 150 million km.
For measuring distances between stars in our
galaxy, astronomers tend to use light-years (ly),
which is a much bigger distance.
We can easily determine the light-year by multiplying
the speed of light in a vacuum (3.0 10
8
m s
1
) by
the time of one year in seconds (see SAQ 4). The
distance to the nearest star from the Sun is about
4.2 ly. The radius of the solar system is roughly 2.0 ly.
For measuring distances between stars and
galaxies, astronomers tend to use the parsec
(pc). The parsec is defned from a technique that
astronomers have used to measure the distance to
other stars nearby in our galaxy. These stars show
parallax; that is, their apparent position against the
background of other, more distant stars alters when
they are observed at different times during the year.
This is a consequence of the Earths orbiting around
the Sun. Figure 18.10 shows the Earth at opposite
ends of its orbit (E
1
and E
2
). If the star 61 Cygni is
observed from these two positions, it is observed to
move through an angle 2p. The angle p is called the
parallax of the star, and it is such a small angle that it
is measured in seconds of arc.
SAQ
a 1 In Figure 18.9, which part shows the life-
history of the Sun?
Explain why the Sun will b
never become a black hole.
a 2 When a star forms, what force causes a cloud
of dust and gas to collapse inwards?
State the force that causes planets to form b
around a new star.
State the force that causes a massive c
neutron star to become a
black hole.
3 A neutron star consists of a vast number of
neutrons, closely packed together.
a Use the following data to
determine the density of
a neutron.
mass of neutron = 1.7 10
27
kg
radius of neutron = 1.3 10
15
m
b A particular neutron star has a mass of
4.0 10
30
kg. Using your answer to part a,
estimate the radius of the neutron star.
c The material of a neutron star consists of
spherical neutrons with small gaps between
them. Explain whether this means that your
answer to part b is an underestimate or an
overestimate.
d The mass of the Sun is 2.0 10
30
kg; its radius
is 7.0 10
8
m. Explain why the neutron stars
radius is so different from that
of the Sun.
Measuring the universe
In science, we generally use SI units. However,
because of the vast scale of the universe, other
units have come into use which can give a better
impression of the distances involved. We will look
at three of these units, their defnitions, and their
relationships to the metre, the SI unit of distance.
For measuring distances in our solar system, it is
convenient to use the astronomical unit (AU). For
example, the planet Uranus is 19.2 AU from the Sun.
The astronomical unit (AU) is the average
distance of the Earth from the Sun.
1 AU = 1.496 10
11
m 1.5 10
11
m
The light-year (ly) is the distance travelled by
light through a vacuum in one year.
1 ly 9.46 10
15
m 9.5 10
15
m
There are 60 arc seconds in a minute of arc, and
60 arc minutes in a degree. Hence:
1 arc second =
1
3600
degrees
Answer
Answer
Hint
Answer
Chapter 18: The nature of the universe
268
The term parsec comes from the words parallax
and second.
Clearly, stars with smaller values of p are at greater
distances, so:
distance (pc) =
1
parallax (arc seconds)
or
d (pc) =
1
p (arc second)
For 61 Cygni, p = 0.3 arc seconds, so its distance
from the Sun is 1/0.3 = 3.3 pc.
From the defnition of the parsec, it can be shown
that (as in Worked example 2):
1 pc 3.1 10
16
m 3.3 ly
Sun
p
p
E
1
E
2
2p
61 Cygni
orbit of Earth
distant stars
apparent position
of 61 Cygni from E
1
apparent position
of 61 Cygni from E
2
1 AU
1 AU
Figure 18.10 Measuring the parallax p of a nearby star.
Show that a parsec (1 pc) is equal to 3.1 10
16
m.
Step 1 For a star at a distance of 1 pc, we can
draw a triangle similar to Figure 18.10. The side
of the triangle opposite to the star has a length of
1 AU see Figure 18.11.
Worked example 2
star
Sun
1 pc
1 arc second
1 AU
Earth
Figure 18.11 This triangle defnes the parsec;
note that it is not drawn to scale the page would
have to be at least 1 km wide.
Step 2 Use the triangle to determine the parsec.
1 AU = 1.496 10
11
m
= 1 arc second = 1/3600 degrees
tan =
1 AU
1 pc
1 pc =
1 AU
tan
=
1.496 10
11
tan (1/3600)
3.1 10
16
m
continued
The parsec is defned as the distance that gives a
parallax angle of 1 arc second.
hyperlink
destination
hyperlink
destination
hyperlink
destination
Chapter 18: The nature of the universe
269
a Copy Table 18.1 and complete the last two
columns of the table as follows: Calculate d
in pc using the conversion 1 pc = 3.3 ly; then
calculate p d.
b Explain signifcance of the
last column.
Star p/arc
sec
d/ly d/pc p d/pc
arc sec
Altair 0.20 16
Arcturus 0.090 36
Capella 0.073 45
Sirius 0.38 8.7
Vega 0.12 26
Table 18.1 See SAQ 7.
SAQ
4 Given that the speed of light in a vacuum is
c = 299 792 458 m s
1
and that 1 year = 365.25636
days, show that 1 light-year is
approximately 9.46 10
15
m.
5 The nearest star (other than the Sun) is Proxima
Centauri. It has a parallax of 0.76 seconds of arc.
Calculate its distance from Earth:
a in parsecs
b in light-years
c in metres.
6 The Moons average distance from the Earth is
4.0 10
5
km. What is this distance
in astronomical units (AU)?
7 The distance d of a star can be determined from its
parallax p. Table 18.1 shows details of some of the
brightest stars in our night sky. The parallax p is in
arc seconds and the distance d is in light years.
Isaac Newton (16421727) suggested that the
universe must be infnitely large and roughly
uniform in its composition. In other words, the
universe has stars scattered throughout it and it goes
on for ever, in all directions. He thought it must be
infnite because he realised that a fnite universe
would collapse under the pull of its own gravity. An
infnite universe has no centre and so it would not
collapse. (In a fnite universe, every star is pulled
towards the centre of gravity of the universe; in an
infnite universe, every star is pulled equally in all
directions so that there is no resultant force on it.)
This idea was challenged in 1826 by Heinrich
Olbers. He pictured a universe that was:
infnite
uniform
static.
Static means neither expanding nor contracting.
He had the idea that, if we lived in such a universe,
Olbers paradox
the sky would always be brightly lit, even at night.
He argued this by saying that, in no matter what
direction you looked, your line of sight would
eventually reach a star. So every point in the sky
would be lit by a star. Although the most distant stars
are very dim, there must be large numbers of them,
which would compensate for their dimness. The
universe would be full of starlight and the surface of
the Earth would be as hot as the surface of a star.
There is another mathematical argument which
also suggests that the night sky ought to be bright.
In an infnite universe with an infnite number
of stars:
the number of stars increases with the square
of the distance. (Imagine a sphere of radius r
sprinkled with stars. The number of stars in this
shell will be proportional to the surface area of
the shell; that is 4r
2
.)
continued
hyperlink
destination
hyperlink
destination
hyperlink
destination
hyperlink
destination
hyperlink
destination
Answer
Answer
Answer
Answer
Extension
Chapter 18: The nature of the universe
270
The expanding universe
Edwin Hubble (Figure 18.12) was an American
astronomer working in the early decades of the
twentieth century. This was a time when big
telescopes were being constructed, which allowed
many thousands of distant and dim galaxies to be
observed. Hubble photographed many galaxies and
made a catalogue of them, classifying them according
to their different shapes. He also became expert in
measuring the distances to galaxies.
These modern telescopes were ftted with
spectrometers which made it possible to record the
spectra of light from individual stars or galaxies.
The lines in the spectra can be interpreted to identify
the elements present in the star. (Every atom of a
particular element produces a line spectrum and the
wavelengths of the lines are characteristic of the
element; see Chapter 20 in Physics 1.)
Another American, Vesto Slipher, had noticed an
interesting phenomenon when he looked at the spectra
of other galaxies. Although they showed the same
pattern of lines (indicating that the same elements
were present as in our own galaxy), the lines were
slightly out of position. The entire spectrum was
shifted, either towards the red end of the spectrum
or towards the blue end. For most galaxies, the lines
were shifted towards the red end of the spectrum. In
other words, their wavelengths were slightly increased
by an amount called the redshift. Figure 18.13 shows
spectra for four galaxies with increasing redshifts.
You can see that each line in the spectrum has been
progressively shifted to longer wavelengths and that
the effect is greater for some galaxies than for others.
Slipher explained these redshifts in terms of the
Doppler effect (see Chapter 17). Electromagnetic
waves (such as light) emitted by a source that is
moving away from the observer are stretched out,
increasing their wavelength from to + see
Figure 18.14. The faster the source is receding, the
the intensity of light from these stars decreases
according to the inverse square with distance.
These two effects cancel each other and hence the
night sky ought to be bright!
Because we know that the sky at night is dark,
Olbers said that at least one of his assumptions
about the universe must be incorrect. It must be
fnite or non-uniform or expanding/contracting, or
some combination of these.
This is Olbers paradox:
Olbers paradox is an example of how big
conclusions (in this case, about the nature of the
universe) can be drawn from simple observations.
Before Olbers, everyone knew that the night sky is
dark, but no-one had realised what that observation
can tell us about the nature of the universe.
In the next section, we will look at evidence that
was gathered in the early twentieth century which
helped to give an answers to Olbers paradox.
For an infnite, uniform and static universe,
the night sky should be bright because of light
received in all directions from stars.
Figure 18.12 Edwin Hubble in front of the 2.5 m
telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory. He
was the frst astronomer to measure the distance
to another galaxy, confrming the existence of
galaxies beyond our own.
hyperlink
destination
Chapter 18: The nature of the universe
271
Hubbles law
Hubbles great achievement was to combine his
measurements of the distances of the galaxies with
measurements of their speeds of recession, deduced
from their redshifts. He plotted a graph showing the
recessional speed v of each galaxy against its distance
x from us. A more up-to-date version of this is shown
in Figure 18.15. The pattern is clear. The greater
the distance x to a galaxy, the greater its speed of
recession v:
speed of recession of galaxy distance of galaxy
v x
This relationship is known as Hubbles law. We can
write it as an equation:
v = H
0
x
greater the redshift. The speed of recession v of a
galaxy (or other source) can be deduced from the
fractional change in wavelength. We can show that:
=
v
c
where c is the speed of light. Note that this only tells
us the component of the galaxys velocity along the
line joining the galaxy to the observer, i.e. directly
away from or towards the observer. The galaxy may
have another component of velocity at right angles
to this, across the observers feld of view. The
equation above is known as the Doppler equation
and can only be applied to a galaxy travelling slowly
compared with the speed of light (that is, v c).
Sliphers measurements made it possible to calculate
the speed of recession of galaxies beyond our own,
and the technique was also applied to determine the
motion of individual stars in our own galaxy. (A few
galaxies were found to have blueshifts; characteristic
wavelengths in their spectra were found to be
shortened, indicating that they are moving towards us.)
galaxy A
galaxy B
galaxy C
galaxy D
H+K
Source emits 1 complete wave in time . a
As it does so, the source moves distance
v .
v
b
So the wavelength is stretched by v .
+ (v )
c
c
The change in wavelength is = .
v
c
=
v
c
Hubbles law: speed of recession of a galaxy
distance of galaxy. An equation for Hubbles law is:
v = H
0
x
The age of the universe is related to the Hubble constant
H
0
by the equation:
age
1
H
0
The SI unit for the Hubble constant is s
1
.
Answer
Answer
Glossary
Chapter 18: The nature of the universe
275
Questions
a 1 Explain why a star like the Sun does not collapse as a result of its own
gravitational feld. [2]
Describe some of the characteristics of a red giant and suggest why it emits b
greater power than a star like the Sun. [4]
Describe the evolution of a star that is much more massive than our Sun. [5] c
Explain why a white dwarf is technically not a star. [2] d
[Total 13]
2 The graphs below show the variation of intensity with wavelength for part of the
Suns spectrum and for the same part of the spectrum from a distant star.
119
Intensity
(Sun)
120 121
Wavelength/nm
119
Intensity
(Star)
120 121
Wavelength/nm
Explain how the stars motion causes corresponding minima of intensity to a
occur at different wavelengths. [2]
Use the graphs to calculate the velocity of the star. [4] b
OCR Physics A2 (2825/01) January 2006 [Total 6]
a 3 Explain briefy how the composition of a star is determined. [2]
b The distances to nearby stars may be determined by parallax, and are often
quoted in parsecs.
Explain the meaning of the term i parallax. [2]
Explain how the ii parsec is defned. A diagram may be helpful. [2]
OCR Physics A2 (2825/01) June 2003 [Total 6]
continued
Answer
Answer
Answer
Chapter 18: The nature of the universe
276
a 4 Explain how Olbers paradox and the work of Hubble on the motions of galaxies
provide evidence for a fnite universe. [6]
The Hubble constant b H
0
is given by the equation:
H
0
=
v
r
where v is the speed of recession of a galaxy and r is the distance from the
observer to the galaxy.
Some observations indicate a value for the Hubble constant i H
0
= 70 km s
1
Mpc
1
.
Convert this value into s
1
. [3]
Hence estimate the age of the universe. [1] ii
Use your answer to iii ii to estimate the maximum observable size for
the universe. [2]
State an assumption you have made in answering c b. [1]
OCR Physics A2 (2825/01) January 2004 [Total 13]
a 5 What is meant by stellar parallax? [2]
The frst recorded stellar parallax had a value of 0.314 arc seconds. b
Calculate the distance of the star from Earth, giving your answer in parsecs. [2] i
What is this distance in metres? [1] ii
OCR Physics A2 (2825/01) June 2007 [Total 5]
Hint
Answer
Answer