By Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari

Glorification of Sher Shah:

Sher Shah Suri, The Tiger King, founder of the Suri Dynasty, was born at
arnaul in in !"#$ and died on %ay &&, !'"' at Kalin(ar) *is original name
was +arid Khan) *is father *asan was a ,agirdar at Sasaram, ) -ll.treated
by his ste/mother, he left home at an early age) *e went to ,aun/ur where
he set himself to serious study and there he ac0uired good command o1er
the 2rabic and 3ersian languages) Because of his abilities, he was soon
a//ointed by his father to manage the family ,agir at Sasaram) 4!5
3icture of Sher Shah
+arid Khan e6/loited this o//ortunity to accumulate riches by highway
robbery and /lundering the wealth and riches of the *indus, ta7ing their
women and children as ca/ti1es and selling them as sla1es, following the
foot ste/s of Ba7hiyar Khal(i, the famoue warlord of , who li1ed in early
!8
th
century 2D) -n one occasion, +arid succeeded to 7ill a tiger and hence
earned the title Sher 9tiger: Khan) The money that Sher Khan
accumulated by ;riminal means hel/ed him raise a small army and hence
to begin his /olitical career) <ater on, Sher Khan could consolidate his
/ower by gaining the /ossession of the ;hunar +ort by marrying the
widow of Ta( Khan Sarang.Khani, the Go1erner of -brahim <odi)
-t may be mentioned here that ;hunar is in the %ir=a/ur District of >ttar
3radesh state, -ndia) Though a small town, ;hunar has a great influence in
-ndian history) The ;hunar +ort was built by %ahara(a ?i7ramaditya, the
King of >((ain, in honour of the stay of his brother Ra(a Bhrithari) 2s /er
*indu records, ;hunar is the corru/t of Sans7rit ;haranadri as <ord
?ishnu had ta7en his first ste/ here in his ?aman incarnation) The /lace
was also well 7nown as ainagarh)
*owe1er, Sher Khan gained considerable strength after defeating the
combined army of and *amayun with his own Bihari army and some
3ashtun tribes men, in !'8@) Then he defeated *umayun at the of Kanau(
on %ay !@, !'"A, and ascended the throne of with the title Sher Shah) *is
reign barely s/anned fi1e years, but the so called secular historians of ,
who are not /re/ared to miss e1en a single o//ortunity to glorify the
%uslim in1aders, /ortray it as a landmar7 in the history of the Sub.
continent) They /ro(ect Sher Shah as a rare genius and say that he made
many brilliant additions and im/ro1ements to the e6isting system of
administration) 4&5
They narrate Sher shah as an outstanding military genius, a great ci1ilian
administrator and, according to themB he left not e1en a single area of
administrati1e syatem where he had not set u/ reforms) But to an
unbiased reader, all such narrations a//ear to be nothing but coc7.and.
bull stories) 2ccording to these s/ineless sla1e historians, Sher Shah had
re1olutioni=ed the re1enue syatem which 27bar later on co/ied) But
according another grou/ of historians, Todar %al, a Ra(/ut minister of
27barCs court, had im/lemented all such reforms connected to re1enue
administration, which are now being wrongly attributed to Sher Shah) 4&5
Road Building of Sher Shah:
The most interesting /art of the e/isode is that, theses s/ineless historians
are /ro(ecting Sher Shah as a great builder, /articularly a road
builder) +rom their childhood, the students of are being taught that Sher
Shah Suri had built the road which is now 7nown as the 9 :) But how far is
this correctD <et us read further to find more information on this matter)
During the days of undi1ided , the said ran from Sonargaon near Dha7a
9now in : u/ to the ban7 of Ri1er -ndus in ) *istorian R);) %a(umdar
writes, Length of the road was 1,500 kos or 3,000 miles (4,800
km).485According to another historian, hri At!l "handra #o$, the length of
the road was 1,400 miles or less than half of # " %a&!mdar's fig!res)
4"5 %oreo1er, R);) %a(umdar holds that the cham/ion road.builder, Sher
Shah, undertoo7 construction of three more roads and com/leted them in
his lifetime) (ne road from Agra towards so!th !) to *!rhan)!r (+00
miles), the second road from Agra ,ia "hittor !) to -odh)!r (.00 miles) and
the third road from Lahore to %!ltan (100 miles).4'5
Thus, according to the estimate of R);) %a(umdar, the total length of all the
roads built by Sher Shah stands at 8,EAA miles or $,&"A 7m) These
historians also say that Sher Shah /lanted trees on both sides of these
roads to /ro1ide shades for the tra1elers and, in addition to that, he set u/
sarais 9inns: at an inter1al of & 7os along the roads where the tra1elers
could ta7e rest) -n these sarais, Sher Shah /ro1ided se/arate
accommodation facilities for the *indus and the %uslims) *e also
em/loyed Brahmin and %uslim coo7s for /re/aring the meals of the
*indu and %uslim 1isitors) The reader should 7ee/ in his mind that all
these things Sher Shah did within ' years, des/ite his hectic military
acti1ities)
-t has been mentioned abo1e that the history boo7s also tell that Sher Shah
ascended the throne of on %ay !@, !'"A, by defeating *umayun in a battle
near Kannau( and in the same year organised a military cam/aign to
su//ress the re1olt of the Ga77ars in ) *e mo1ed east, the ne6t year, to
su//ress a similar re1olt in in %arch, !'"! 2D) The ne6t year, he mo1ed
against the Ra(/ut 7ings in central and con0uered %alwa) The 1ery ne6t
year 9i)e) in !'"8 2D:, he organised a cam/aign against the *indu 7ing
3uran %al and too7 control of the fort at Raisin and then mo1ed against
the Ra(/ut 7ing of %arwar) -n !'"" he subdued the Rathore 7ing, %alde1
and in the subse0uent year, he died in an accident in !'"' 2D, in Kalin(ar)
So, the rule of Sher Shah lasted only for fi1e years and out of these fi1e
years, he s/ent nearly one year to gain control o1er the fort of Kalin(ore)
4$5 During the rest of his reign, he was on hectic mo1ement from east to
west and north to south for su//ressing re1olts or con0uering new forts) -t
should be mentioned here that the /eriod under consideration was a
/eriod of /olitical chaos and lawlessness and to restore order, Sher Shah
had to fight many battles and that too with /artial success) Thus the
0uestion naturally arises.Fas it /ossible for Sher Shah 9or any other ruler
of that time: to build such long roads within such a short s/an of
timeD +urthermore, is it /ossible to ma7e roads, nearly $,&"A Km long,
today using modern technology, within a /eriod of " or ' yearsD The real
story is that, 2bbas Khan, a court.chronicler of Sher Shah had written
some lies to /lease and glorify his master and our historians too7 those
narrations at their face 1alue, without a//lying their common sense to
estimate the credibility of those blatant lies)
2 close scrutiny of e1ents, during the time of Sher Shah, also re1eals that,
des/ite his 1ast efforts, he did not succeed in bringing the 1ast stretch of
land, from Dha7a in Bengal and Ri1er -ndus in , under his control) So,
how could Sher Shah carry out such a gigantic /ro(ect li7e ma7ing a road
from Bengal to , when the territory in 0uestion was not under his
su/reme controlD
2 %uslim chronicler, Shei7h urul *a0ue, most /robably honest, who
mentioned in his/!0dat!t 1awarikh, the road.building endea1our of Sher
Shah, and wrote, her hah made the road which now r!ns from 2elhi to
Agra, 0$ c!tting trees in &!ngles, remo,ing o0stacles and 0!ilt serais. *efore
that time )eo)le had to tra,el thro!gh the doa0 0etween these two
)laces.4@5 This descri/tion seems /lausible and Sher Shah could ha1e
built a road, 8AA Km long, within his reign of " years) -t is im/ortant to
note thatthis chronicler did not mention a single word about building a
road from Bengal to by Sher Shah)
*owe1er, regarding the road building acti1ities of Sher Shah, 2bbas Khan,
a court chronicler of Sher Shah, in his 1arikh3i3her hah, writes, %a$
glor$ and 0lessings 0e !)on his eminent dignit$4 5or the con,enience in
tra,eling of )oor tra,elers, on e,er$ road, at a distance of two kos, he made
a sarai (inn)6 and one road with sarais he made from the fort which he 0!ilt
in the 7!n&a0 to the cit$ of , which is sit!ated in the of , on the shore of the
ocean.. Another road he made from the cit$ of to *!rhan)!r, which is on
the 0orders of the kingdom of the 2ekhin, and he made one from the cit$
of to and "hitor6 and one road with sarais from the cit$ of to . Altogether
he 0!ilt 1800 sarais on ,ario!s roads6 and in e,er$ sarai he 0!ilt se)arate
lodgings , 0oth for 9ind!s and %!s!lmans, and at the gate of e,er$ sarai he
had )laced )ots f!ll of water, that an$ one might drink6 and in e,er$ sarai he
settled *rahmans for the entertainment of 9ind!s, to )ro,ide hot and cold
water, and 0eds and food, and grain for their horses6 and it was a r!le in
these sarais, that whoe,er entered them recei,ed )ro,ision s!ita0le to his
rank, and food and litter for his cattle from :o,ernment.4#5
;illages were esta0lished all ro!nd the sarais. <n the middle of e,er$ sarai
was a well and a mas&id of 0!rnt 0rick6 and he )laced an imam and a
m!e==in in e,er$ mas&id, together with c!stodians (shahna), and se,eral
watchmen6 and all these were maintained from the land near the sarai. <n
e,er$ sarai, two horses were ke)t, that the$ might >!ickl$ carr$ news. <
ha,e heard that 9!ssain 1ashtdar once, on an emergenc$, rode 300 kos in
one da$. (n 0oth sides of the highwa$, her hah )lanted fr!it30earing trees,
s!ch as also ga,e m!ch shade, that in the hot wind tra,elers might go along
!nder the trees6 and if the$ sho!ld sto) 0$ the wa$, might rest and take
re)ose. <f the$ )!t !) at a sarai, the$ 0o!nd their horses !nder the trees,
2bbas Khan continues)4#5

Sher ShahCs %ausoleum at Sasaram
+rom what has been said abo1e, it becomes e1ident that 2bbas
Khan wrote dar7est lies in his 1arikh3i3her hah, to /lease and glorify his
master and our historians sim/ly co/ied those narrations without
considering the credibility of those narrations) To any unbiased reader, it
would a//ear utterly im/ossible for Sher Shah to build such long roads,
e1en if he would ha1e de1oted his ' or " years of rein entirely for road
building setting his military and /olitical as/ects aside) *owe1er, it is a
shame that the s/ineless secular historians of , to glorify the foreign
in1aders, are belie1ing in these coc7 and bull stories which, /erha/s, e1en
a don7ey would refuse to admit)
2s a matter of fact, is a great country and its ci1ili=ation is oldest in the
world) 2nd it is needless to say that such a grand ci1ili=ation could not
ha1e de1elo/ed and sustained without e6tensi1e trade and commerce, and
without good roads such large scale trade and commerce could not ha1e
been /ossible)) So, sim/le common sense tells us that there were networ7s
of good roads in e6istence throughout the country from 1ery ancient
times, centuries before the arri1al of the %uslim in1aders) Gne should
remember that, in those days, military cam/aigns among the *indu 7ings
were 1ery common affair) *ow could these military cam/aigns ha1e been
/ossible without good roadsD -t means that there were good roads, wide
enough for chariots drawn by four horses, e1en in 1ery ancient times) +or
e6am/le, the e/ic %ahabharata describes how 7ings from remote corners
of this country had assembled at Kuru7shetra with their army to
/artici/ate in the war) Did they come to Kuru7shetra through (unglesD

3icture of ;hunar +ort on
Gther ;redits 2ttributed to Sher Shah:
2ccording to our historians, Sher Shah was not only a cham/ion road
builder but her hah )lanted shade3gi,ing trees on 0oth sides of the roads
and sarais or rest ho!ses at an inter,al of . kos, where se)arate
arrangements were )ro,ided for the %!slims and the 9ind!s.4E5 *ow
could Sher Shah do all these things within a /eriod of about four
yearsD o sane man would belie1e in this garbage of lies e6ce/t the
secular historians of )
To glorify Sher Shah, our historians write, her hah was indeed a striking
)ersonalit$ in the histor$ of medie,al <ndia ? 9is militar$ character was
marked 0$ a rare com0ination of ca!tion and enter)rise, his )olitical
cond!ct was, on the whole, &!st and h!mane6 his religio!s attit!de was free
from medie,al 0igotr$6 and his e@cellent taste in 0!ilding is well attested,
e,en toda$, 0$ his no0le ma!sole!m at asaram. 9e a))lied his
indefatiga0le ind!str$ to the ser,ice of the state, and his reforms were well
calc!lated to sec!re the interests of the )eo)le.4!A5
Fhat Sher Shah Really was:
But, in reality, Sher Shah was a %uslim 3athan from and li7e any other
%uslim in1aders, he was e0ually treacherous and cruel to the *indus) *is
court chronicler, 2bbas Khan, in his 1ari>3i3her hah, says that in !'"8,
Sher Shah in1aded the 7ingdom of the *indu 7ing, 3uran %al, and /ut his
Raisin fort under siege which com/elled the *indu army to
surrender) 3uran %al sought a safe /assage for his royal family and army)
Sher Shah agreed) So 3uran %al and his army came out of the fort and
too7 shelter in a /re.arranged cam/ /ro1ided by Sher Shah, (ust outside
the fort)
-n the meantime, the 3athan army started massacring the *indus and to
describe the wholesale slaughter, 2bbas Khan writes, Ahile the 9ind!s
were em)lo$ed in )!tting their women and families to death, the Afghans on
all sides commenced sla!ghtering of the 9ind!s. 7!ran %al and his
commanders, like )igs at a 0a$, failed to e@hi0it ,alo!r and gallantr$, and
within the twinkle of an e$e, all were slain. !ch of their wi,es and families,
as were not slain, were ca)t!red. (ne da!ghter of 7!ran %al and three sons
of his 0rother were taken ali,e and the rest were all killed. her hah ga,e
the da!ghter of 7!ran %al to some itinerant minstrels (0a=igars) that the$
might make her dance in the 0a=aars, and ordered the 0o$s to 0e castrated,
so that the race of the o))ressors (i.e. the 9ind!s) might not increase. 4!!5
2t that time, the Rohtas fort in Bihar was under the control of the *indu
7ing, *ari Roy, who was a friend of Sher Shah) -n !'8@, *umayun
launched a military cam/aign against Sher Shah and /roceeded to attac7
the fortress at ;hunar) Sher Shah had !,AAA women in his harem in the
said fort at ;hunar) 2//rehending the fall of ;hunar fort, Sher Shah
re0uested Ra(a *ari Krishna to /ro1ide a safe /lace for his harem in the
Rohtas fort) Gnce u/on a time, the Ra(a had gi1en, in a similar crisis,
shelter to %ia a=im 9younger brother of Sher Shah: and hence Sher Shah
could re0uest the Ra(a for a similar bene1olence) 2t first, King *ari
Krishna was hesitant)
*owe1er, on Sher ShahCs /romise by touching the Huran, the Ra(a agreed
to gi1e shelter, but could smell a rat) 2s soon as Ra(a *ari Krishna agreed,
Sher Shah hatched a /lan to ca/ture the fort) 2bout !,&AA dolis
9/alan0uins: were made ready o1ernight and two 2fghan soldiers, clad in
bur0as, occu/ied each doli) The security staff in the fort chec7ed the first
few dolis and failing to detect the cons/iracy, allowed the rest to enter the
fort) early &,'AA 3athan soldiers succeeded in entering the fort and in the
mid.night they started 7illing the *indu security guards and thus occu/ied
the fort) King *ari Krishna somehow managed to esca/e the fort through
a secret /assage) 4!&5 Gur s/ineless historians describe this incident as
e6hibit of e6em/lary military acumen and bra1ery of Sher Shah) 4!85
But *ari Krishna Roy did not 7now that the Koran instructs the %uslims
that they can enter into any agreement with the 7afirs and brea7 that
agreement in the o//ortune moment, for the benefit of -slam) %oreo1er,
2llah designates such a treachery with the 7afirs as ta0iyah or holy
dece/tion and attaches merit for such treacherous acti1ities)
This 7ind of treachery is still going on today and an incident may be cited
in this conte6t) Fhen -ndian 3rime %inister 2 B ?a(/ayee and 3a7istani
3rime %inister awa= Sharf were ha1ing /eace tal7s at Rawal/indi in
!EE#, the 3a7istani army, at the instigation of awa= Sharif, was crossing
the <ine of ;ontrol 9<G;: between -ndia and the 3a7 occu/ied Kashmir
93GK: and occu/ying the military bun7ers on the -ndian side at Kargil)
*owe1er, our so.called secular historians carefully a1oid all these as/ects
in their 1ersions of history and /refer to follow two fundamental
guidelines, as mentioned abo1e, to glorify the %uslim rulers)
*ow +arid Khan became Sher Shah:
-t has been mentioned earlier that the so called secular and %ar6ist
historians distort the %uslim colonial /eriod of -ndian history following
the guidelines.
!: The /eriod of %uslim rule in was not a colonial /eriod as the %uslim
rulers, though came from outside, stayed bac7 in this country)
&: The said %uslim /eriod of -ndian history should be mentioned as a
golden /eriod of -ndian history, not a colonial /eriod)
8: The ugly face of -slam is to be su//ressed and it should be /ro(ected as a
noble, generous, e6tremely tolerant and socialistic religion, and religion of
uni1ersal brotherhood)
": The *induism is to be e6/osed as a base religion infected with the
inhuman institution li7e casteism and full of des/icable su/erstitions)
': The foreign %uslim rulers are to be narrated as highly ci1ili=ed,
generous, /olished and 1alorous /eo/le and they were far su/erior to the
*indus in military s7ill and bra1ery)
$: During the %uslim rule, the *indus and %uslims li1ed in /eace as good
neighbours and the /resent enmity and hatred between the two
communities was created later on by the British colonialists)
@: -t should ne1er be mentioned that the %uslim rulers had massacred the
*indus in hundreds of thousands, demolished thousands *indu tem/les
or con1erted them into mos0ues)
It should never be mentioned that the Muslim rulers converted the
Hindus at the point of sword. On the contrary, it should be said the
low caste Hindus, being oppressed by the high caste Hindus and
attracted by the generous and socialistic ideals of Islam, accepted
Islam in droves and so on and so forth.
2ccording to the set guidelines as mentioned abo1e, the so called secular
historians are /ro(ecting Sher Shah as a great ruler, a rare genius free
from religious bigotry and by any similar lofty word the might find in the
dictionary) They also say thate6em/lary military s7ill, 7een foresight,
e6treme diligence and /rudence hel/ed Sher Shah rising from humble
+arid Khan and ending u/ ultimately as the Sultan of ) But the real story is
0uite different)
-n an earlier article, it has been /ointed out that -slam has nothing li7e
human resource de1elo/ment /rogram and it has no /lan to de1elo/ its
followers as wealth creators) Gn the contrary, the Koran ins/ires the
%uslims to ac0uire wealth by criminal means such as theft, robbery and
/lunder of the 7afirs by waging (ihad against them) %ost im/ortantly,
their 7ro)het ta!ght his followers this eas$ means for ac>!iring wealth 0$
killing and dri,ing awa$ the -ews from %edina and confiscating and
distri0!ting their wealth and the riches among the 0elie,ers. -t is needless to
say that these teachings of -slam ha1e made its followers, though /oor in
creati1e intelligentsia, e6/ert in criminal acti1ities)
2s a %uslim, +arid Khan also utili=ed that celebrated criminal /ath to
accumulate wealth while he was ser1ing his father to manage his (agir) *e
used to conduct raids on *indu 1illages, /lunder the wealth and riches of
the *indu sub(ects of his fatherCs (agir, to become rich) 2s a /rocedure, he
used to encircle a *indu 1illage, 7ill the adult males and sell the women
and children as sla1es and confiscate their /ro/erties) *e also used
to bring false allegations against the *indu landlords and occu/y their
wealth and /ro/erties after 7illing them en masse or dri1ing them out of
the (agir)
To narrate such a raid in a *indu 1illage, 2bbas *asan in his 1arikh3i3her
hahi, writes, 9is horsemen he directed to )atrol aro!nd the ,illages, to
kill all men the$ meet and to make )risoners of the women and children, to
dri,e in cattle to )ermit no one to c!lti,ate the fields, to destro$ the cro)s
alread$ sown and not to )ermit an$ one to 0ring an$thing in from
neigh0o!ring )arts. 4!"5
To describe how +arid Khan attac7ed and /lundered the wealth of the
*indu =amindars, 2bbas *asan, in his 1arikh3i3her hahi, writes, Barl$
in the morning, 5arid Chan mo!nted and attacked the criminal =amindars,
and )!t all the re0els to death, and making their women and children
)risoners, ordered his men to sell them or kee) them as sla,es and 0ro!ght
other )eo)le (i.e. Afghan %!slims) to the ,illage and settled them
there. 4!"5
Fhile commenting on such o//ression of the %uslim rulers on the
hel/less *indus, * % Illiot writes,Dnder sa!ch r!lers, we cannot wonder
that the fo!ntains of &!stice are corr!)ted6 that the state re,en!es are ne,er
collected witho!t ,iolence and o!trage6 that ,illages are 0!rnt and their
inha0itants m!tilated or sold to sla,er$6 that the officials, so far from
affording )rotection, are themsel,es the chief ro00ers and !s!r)ers6 and
that the )oor find no redress against the o))ressor's wrong and )ro!d
man's cons!mel$. 4!'5
*e also writes, 1he few glim)ses we ha,e of 9ind!s slain for dis)!ting with
the %!hammadans, of )rohi0itions against )rocessions, worshi) and
a0l!tions, and of other intolerant meas!res, of idols m!tilated, of tem)les
ra=ed, of forci0le con,ersions and marriages of )roscri)tions and
confiscations, of m!rders and massacres, and of the sens!alit$ and
dr!nkenness of the t$rants who en&oined them, show !s that this )ict!re is
no o,ercharged, and it is m!ch to 0r regretted that we are left to draw it for
o!rsel,es from o!t of the man of ordinar$ occ!rrences, recorded 0$ writers
who seem to s$m)athi=e with no ,irt!es and to a0hor no ,ices. 4!$5
But it is a shame that the so called secular historians of are /ortraying
o//ressi1e and (ihadi rulers as e6tremely 7ind hearted, generous, tolerant
and /olished /eo/le free of religious bigotry) -t is needless to say that, by
such false /ortrayal of those diabolical rulers, they are committing an
un/ardonable crime)
JJJJJJJJJJJJJ.
References:
[1] http!!www.storyofpa"istan.com!person.asp#perid$%&''
4&5 R);) %a(umdar, *);) Raychaudhury and K) Datta, 2n 2d1anced *istory
of -ndia, %acmillan K ;o 9!E#A:,
"&#."&E)
485 R);) %a(umdar 9General Iditor:, The *istory and ;ulture of the -ndian
3eo/le, Bharatiya ?idya Bha1an 9in !& 1olumes:, %umbai 9!EE$: ?--, #@)
4"5 2tul ;handra Roy, Bharater -tihas 9in Bengali:, %auli7 <ibrary, 9!E#':,
-, #")
4'5 R);) %a(umdar, *);) Raychaudhury and K) Datta, 2n 2d1anced *istory
of -ndia, %acmillan K ;o 9!E#A:, )"8"
4$5 2tul ;handra Roy, ibid, %auli7 <ibrary, 9!E#':, -, &@)
4@5 *)%) Illiot and ,) Dowson, The *istory of .2s Told by -ts Gwn *istorians
9in # 1olumes:, <ow 3rice 3ublication, 9!EE$: -?, "##)
4#5 *)%) Illiot and ,) Dowson, 9ibid: <ow 3rice 3ublication, 9!EE$: -?, "!@.
"!#)
4E5 R);) %a(umdar et al 9ibid: %acmillan K ;o 9!E#A:, "8")
4!A5 R);) %a(umdar et al 9ibid: %acmillan K ;o 9!E#A:, "8')
4!!5 *)%) Illiot and ,) Dowson 9ibid: -?, "A8)
4!&5 *)%) Illiot and ,) Dowson 9ibid: -?, 8$!)
4!85 2tul ;handra Roy, ibid, %auli7 <ibrary, 9!E#':, -, &'))
4!"5 *)%) Illiot and ,) Dowson 9ibid: -?, 8!$)
4!'5 *)%) Illiot and ,) Dowson 9ibid: -, 66)
4!$5 *)%) Illiot and ,) Dowson 9ibid: -, 66i)
9To be continued:
written by Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari

!)
(I)*O+*IO, O- I,(I., HI)*O+/ -O+ M0)1IM .%%2.)2M2,*, %art 3
4 5 6ande,i"hilam Says:
,une !Ath, &AAE at 8:"# /m
4)))5 the rest here: D-STGRT-G G+ -D-2 *-STGRL +GR %>S<-%
233I2SI%IT, 3art " M This entry is filed under 3uran) Lou can follow
any res/onses to this entry through the RSS &)A 4)))5
19 Responses to DISTORTION OF INDIAN HISTORY FOR MUSLIM APPEASEMENT, Part
4
!) !) )umanyu Says:
,une !Ath, &AAE at E:'" am
/erha/s these historians /ortray such 1iolent in1aders and /lunderers as
7ind hearted rulers so that foolish masses thin7 that these historians are
1ery honest and secular in their writings)
i fail to gras/ that if these /lunderers were such nice and 7ind /eo/le then
why did they wage demolitions of ci1ili=ations, why they con0uered other
/eo/les land