Edu 528, WEEK 4: Adult Learning Within the Human Resource Development. In this lesson, we will discuss Human Resource Development goals. To gain respect within the organization HRD must position itself as a strategic partner.
Edu 528, WEEK 4: Adult Learning Within the Human Resource Development. In this lesson, we will discuss Human Resource Development goals. To gain respect within the organization HRD must position itself as a strategic partner.
Edu 528, WEEK 4: Adult Learning Within the Human Resource Development. In this lesson, we will discuss Human Resource Development goals. To gain respect within the organization HRD must position itself as a strategic partner.
EDU 528, WEEK 4, PART 2: Adult Learning Within the Human Resource Development
Slide # Topic Narration
Slide 1 Introduction Welcome to Methods of Teaching in Adult Education. In this lesson, we will discuss Adult Learning Within the Human Resource Development.
Next slide. Slide 2 Topics The following topics will be covered in this lesson:
Human resource development goals;
Human resource development and performance improvement;
Human resource development and adult learning;
The premise of individuals controlling their own learning; and
The phases of the adult learning planning process;
Next slide. Slide 3 Topics, continued We will also cover the following topics:
Adults determine their own learning needs;
Adults create and implement their own learning; and
Adults evaluate their own learning.
Next slide. Slide 4 Human Resource Development Goals Both human resource development or HRD and adult education or AE view adult education as central to their theory and practice. HRD and AE differ on the issues related to control of the goals and purposes for which adult education is employed.
There are two perspectives on what the HRD should focus on: Some argue that HRD should focus on increasing the performance requirements of its organization by developing the organizations workforce; Others say HRD should focus on individual development and personal fulfillment without using organizational performance as a measure of its worth.
Hortons taxonomy of performance outcomes and performance drivers bridges the gap between the two perspectives on the priorities of HRD. Horton argues HRD professionals should pay attention to both performance outcomes and performance drivers. Organization performance such as high quality service delivered to customers can be linked to performance drivers such as learning and process improvement.
One can look at HRD as a subsystem that functions within the larger organizational system. To gain respect within the organization HRD must position itself as a strategic partner and attain the same level of importance as the other traditional core organizational processes such as finance production, and marketing.
Among the resources that a firm or an organization depends on, the human resource is probably the most important. Human resources are in some ways similar to the other resources in that firms expect a return on the money they invest in the resources. It would not make economic sense for an organization to invest money on their employees if they do not contribute to the profitability and the viability of the organization.
Performance is the means by which organizations measure their goals. This can be measured through a number of ways such as rate of return, cycle of return, and quality of output. Performance can be measured at organizational, process, and individual levels.
Next slide. Slide 5 Human Resource Development and Performance Improvement There are a number of ways in which human resource development can improve performance at the individual, process, and organizational levels.
Within each cell are enabling questions that permit diagnosis of performance. Each cell in the matrix can also serve as a conceptual framework for classifying performance interventions.
There are a number of questions that can be asked at the different performance levels. For example consider the mission/goal performance variable.
Organizational Level: Does the organizations mission/goal fit internal and external realities such as economic, cultural and political forces? The answer this question will determine whether there is a need for intervention. Process Level: Do the process goals enable the organization to meet the organizational and individual goals? Individual level: Are the professional and personal mission/goals of individuals in line with the organizations?
Business and industry leaders use the knowledge and expertise that fits within and between the fifteen cells of the matrix to talk about the core competence to the life of their companies.
Adult learning has a part to play in almost all the fifteen cells of the performance diagnosis matrix. For example, if HRD wants to change the organizational culture, then principles and practices of adult learning will play an important role as the employees develop and learn new norms. The role of HRD is to build the organizations strategic capability; therefore, adult learning is critical to maintain the performance of the existing system and to improve on that system.
Next slide. Slide 6 Human Resource Development and Adult Learning There are a number of definitions for human resource development. Here are two examples, one by Swanson and the second one by McLagan.
Swanson: HRD is a process of development and/or unleashing human expertise through organizational development and personal training and development for the purpose of improving performance at the organization, work process, and individual levels.
McLagan: HRD is the integrated use of training and, organizational development and career development to improve individual, group, and organizational effectiveness.
The two definitions show that the outcome of HRD is performance improvement and that learning is the core component of HRD. However, it should be noted that there is more to HRD than training or adult learning. HRD can initiate interventions that do not have any planned educational component. This requires what is called unleashing human expertise.
We have discussed before that HRD and AE differ on the issues related to control of the goals and purposes for which adult education is employed. If the organization holds the control to approve or disapprove learning interventions, adult learning is HRD. HRD and AE are discrete disciplines. Their area of intersection occurs within adult learning.
When adult learning outcomes and learning process decisions about individuals are bounded by the rules of and requirements of the organization, then adult learning is HRD. When adult learning outcomes and learning process and requirements are located in the individual then adult learning is AE. Some activities of HRD do not focus on adult learning. For HRD, adult learning focuses on development interventions with two attributes: The context is organizational, and the desired outcome is learning-that will impact the performance goals of the organization.
There can be tension in terms of organizational control if the individuals needs and goals are not congruent with the organizational performance requirements. Learning professionals in HRD must balance the two. Sometimes it is not possible for an organization to implement all the adult learning principles. For example, it is inconceivable for an organization to invest in learning programs for its employees that do not lead to performance improvement over the long run.
Next slide. Slide 7 The Premise of Individuals Controlling Their own Learning There is a common belief that better outcome results when the learner has control throughout the learning phases. This is one of the popular ideas in adult education. However, there is no consensus on how much control individual learners want and can handle.
There was a discussion in the eighties about embracing self-directed learning as a unifying theory and goal for the field of AE. Brookfield, one of the leading proponents observed that self-directed learning is more complex that it was first proposed.
The core assumptions of andragogy do not raise learner self-directedness to the same level as has been proposed by many AE theorists and practitioners. According to andragogy, adults have a self-concept and expect others to treat them as capable of self-direction. AE suggests that the purpose of learning is to develop self-directed learning capacity in adults. HRD practice is generally in agreement with the andragogical notion of self-concept, but does not share the goals and purpose of adult education.
HRD focuses on performance outcomes, so the significance of learner control is viewed as secondary by most professionals in HRD.
Next slide. Slide 8 The Phases of the Adult Learning Planning Process Adult learning is defined as the process of adults gaining knowledge and expertise. Here we will discuss the issues surrounding the core idea of learners controlling their own learning process.
The adult learners controlling their learning planning process framework can be used to discuss the issues surrounding the core idea of learners controlling their own learning process. It has four phases: These are used to search for what is known about the learners controlling their own learning process.
Need: Determine what learning is needed to achieve goals; Create: Create a strategy to achieve the learning goals; Implement: Implement the learning strategy and use the learning resources; and Evaluate: Assess the attainment of the learning goal and the process of reaching it.
Next slide. Slide 9 Adults Determine Their own Learning needs Adults who show control in the need phase of the framework for Adult learners control their learning planning process will be able to determine the learning needs to achieve their personal goals.
The idea of control at the need determination phase can be better examined through the perspective of four types of learning:
Unintended learning: There is no locus of control; Self-directed learning: This is learner controlled; Mediated learning: There is shared control between the learner and some external authority; and Authority directed learning: This is authority controlled.
Most of the adults want to learn on their own because they want to retain control of the learning process. Literature in the AE portrays learning professionals as reacting to the needs expressed by adult learners. This approach is neither strategic nor tactical. There are a number of assumptions about students that this approach makes such that the learner is fully aware of his or her needs, the learner can accurately assess the specific learning required.
The idea of adults determining their own learning needs can be extended to HRD. HRD can conduct a learning or training wants survey. The training options with the highest votes will then be used as a basis for the course offering. The problem with this approach is that it does not take care of individual, work process, and the organization. Sometimes the individual may not have the expertise to analyze their needs. It is not effective for improving performance.
Next slide. Slide 10 Adults Create and Implement Their own Learning The second and third phases of the adult learning planning process involve creating a strategy to achieve the learning goals and the resources to achieve the learning goal and implementing the learning strategy and using the learning resources.
There isnt enough relevant literature in adult education that dwells much on the learner control of the creation and implementation planning phases. Some have concluded from research that high motivation could lead to high satisfaction and achievement without participant planning involvement. This could be interpreted in a number of ways such as, the students involvement at the needs phase is critical for the purpose of motivation and that learner involvement at the other phases is not as important.
It is always the struggle for the HRD to strike a balance to meet organizational goals and at the same time engage the learners.
In the create and implement phases of planning learning theory and practice, the shared control between the external authority or instructor and the learner is the principal focus rather than the learners self-direction. In the create phase, the professional educators engage learners and potential learners to establish motivation and community and to promote validity of the experience and materials. In the implementation phase, the shared control can take a number of forms such as team learning, formative evaluation and peer instruction.
Next slide. Slide 11 Adults Evaluate Their own Learning Evaluation is defined as a systematic collection of evidence to determine if desired changes are taking place
Who evaluates depends on who was in control of learning in the first place. If the learner has retained and executed control, then the learner should be asking the evaluation question What evidence needs to be collected to determine whether desired changes took place? All the questions on learning are focused on learning outcomes or summative evaluation. The questions are not focused on the process of working toward the learning outcome or formative evaluation.
There are two different measures of outcomes: Some are direct while others are proxy or related measures. Indirect measures have highly questionable validity. Adult learners who depend on proxy measures such as self-assessment of anticipated outcomes may make false conclusions based on invalid data. The learner who wants to retain self- control must reach outside his or her internal reference to gain rational evaluation data. This can be obtained from formal tests or expert judges.
Because HRD functions in an organizational world that demands results and assessing of results, management or work teams will be full partners of evaluation phase of learning outcomes rather than the individual learners.
Next slide. Slide 12 Check Your Understanding
Slide 13 Summary We have now reached the end of the lesson. Lets take a look at what we have covered. We started our discussion by examining human resource development goals. Here, we learnt that both human resource development and adult education view adult learning as central to their theory and practice. However, they differ on the issues related to control of the goals and purposes for which adult education is employed. We also learned that HRD can have two foci, individual first then organization; or organization first then individual. Hortons taxonomy of performance outcomes and performance drivers bridges the gap between the two perspectives on the priorities of HRD. Next, we examined human resource development and performance improvement. Here, we learned that there are a number of ways in which human resource development can improve performance at the individual, process, and organizational levels. The diagnosis of performance can be done by using performance diagnosis matrix of enabling questions. Business and industry leaders use the knowledge and expertise that fits within and between the fifteen cells of the matrix to talk about the core competence to the life of their companies. Also we learned that adult learning has a part to play in almost all the fifteen cells of the performance diagnosis matrix. We then examined human resource development and adult learning. Here, we learned that that the outcome of HRD is performance improvement and that learning is the core component of HRD. We also learned that when adult learning outcomes and learning process decisions about individuals are bounded by the rules of and requirements of the organization, then adult learning is HRD. When adult learning outcomes and learning process and requirements are located in the individual then adult learning is AE. Next, we examined the premise of individuals controlling their learning. Here we learned that there is no consensus on how much control individual learners want and can handle. Self-directed learning is more complex that it was first proposed. Andragogy says that adults have a self- concept and expect others to treat them as capable of self- direction. AE suggests that the purpose of learning is to develop self-directed learning capacity in adults. We then examined the phases of the adult learning planning process. Here, we learnt that adult learning is the process of adults gaining knowledge and expertise. Here, we also learnt that we can use the adult learners controlling their learning planning process framework to discuss the issues surrounding the core idea of learners controlling their own learning process. The framework has four phases: Need, create, implement, and evaluate. Next slide. Slide 14 Summary, continued Next, we examined adults create and implement their own learning. Here, we learnt that adults who show control in the need phase of the Adult learners controlling their own learning process framework will be able to determine the learning needs to achieve their personal goals. There are four types of learning that can be used to examine the idea of control at the need determination phase: Unintended learning; Self-directed learning; Mediated learning; and Authority directed learning The idea of adults determining their own learning needs can be extended to HRD. HRD can conduct a process, and the organization. We then examined adults create and implement their own learning. Here, we learnt that there isnt enough relevant literature in adult education that dwells much on the learner control of the creation and implementation planning phases. We also learnt that it is always the struggle for the HRD to strike a balance to meet organizational goals and at the same time engage the learners. In the create and implement phases of planning learning theory and practice, the shared control between the external authority or instructor and the learner is the principal focus rather than the learners self-direction. Finally, we examined adults evaluate their own learning. Here, we learned that evaluation a systematic collection of evidence to determine if desired changes are taking place. There are two different measures of outcomes: Some are direct while others are proxy or related measures. Indirect measures have highly questionable validity. This completes this lesson.