Holy Angel University

College of Engineering & Architecture

Department of Computer Engineering
PROJECT STUDY EVALUATION FORM PROPOSAL DEFENSE!
Name of Panelist : _________________________________________ Signature: ____________________
Date of Defense : __________________________________________ Venue of Defense: SH-AVR
Proect Stu!" #itle : ____________________________________________________________________________________________
A" ORAL PRESENTATION #$%!
Criteri& M&' (r&)e
$% Content
Extent of coverage, difficulty level of coverage, clarity of coverage,
consistency of the presentation with the submitted documents
*
&% 'rgani(ation
')erall
Coherent, good coordination, easy to follow, concise, clear and
appropriate
*ntro!uction
Gained the panels interest and immediate attention, stated purpose
clearly and identified the topic and defined the scope of the
presentation
+o!"
Main points were supported with details, documented facts where
necessary, sounded believable and persuasive, and informative
Conclusion
Signaled the ending, summarized main points and closed smoothly
*
,% Deli)er" St"le
resentation delivered in a poised and professional manner! Good
posture and appearance, maintained eye contact with panel, facial
expressions, hand control, body movements, voice and pacing, and use
of time!
+$ + , - . * #
-% Presentation .e!ia
Clear, well organized, readable, visually appealing, and used effectively
to direct the panels attention!
+$
/% 0anguage
Complexity, grammar, pronunciation and enunciation, stress and
intonation, vocabulary, and fluency
*
1% 2uestion an! Ans3er Perio!
Confi!ence in 4no3le!ge of topic
A5ilit" to ans3er reasona5le 6uestions
Ans3ers are 5rief an! accurate%
Stu!ents e7hi5it a5ilit" to infer or h"pothesi(e an ans3er from a)aila5le
information%
,*
+ , - . * #
/" THESIS DRAFT .$%!
Criteri& M&' (r&)e
$% #itle
Clear an! informati)e
Hints at scope8 approach an! argument
0
&% *ntro!uction
Esta5lishes purpose clearl"
Pro5lem an! h"potheses are clearl" state!
Pro5lem is significant
*mportant terms are operationall" !efine!
Re)ie3 of Relate! 0iterature
Co)erage of the literature is a!e6uate
Re)ie3 of the literature is organi(e!
Stu!ies are e7amine! criticall"
Relationship of the pro5lem to the pre)ious research is ma!e
clear
+*
,% .etho!olog" an! S"stem Design
Research is full" !escri5e! 5" a general 5loc4 !iagram an! a
mo!ular !iagram%
Data gathering metho!s are appropriate an! are use! correctl"
Vali!it" an! relia5ilit" of !ata gathering metho!s are
esta5lishe!%
+$
-% .anner of 9riting
St"le
Effective organization, clearly written, logically organized, smooth
transitions, avoids empty or pretentious language, does not use
contractions, clear sentences, ob"ective and open#minded tone
:ormat
$ollows guidelines, consistent and correctly applied %% format,
attractively and neatly presented, cites to materials as appropriate
.echanics
Correct spelling, correct grammar, free from typographical errors,
no missing sources, variety of sentence and paragraph length
1

#'#A0:
+ , - . * #