Professional Documents
Culture Documents
= 4.80
E
Th
= ,
Short circuit the 12V voltage source,
R
Th
= (3238 || 2162) + 980 ,
= 2.276kO =
= 1.753mA
I
L
= 1.753mA
2.276kO
462O
4.80 V
Refer to Figure 2,
Mesh analysis,
12+( 3238 + 2162 )i
1
2162i
2
= 0 mesh 1
( 2162 + 980 + 462 )i
2
2162i
1
= 0 mesh 2
From mesh 2,
i
1
= (2162+980+462)i
2
2162 (i)
Sub (i) into mesh 2,
12 + (3238 + 2162)|(2162 + 980 + 462)i
2
2162| 2162i
2
= 0
i
2
= 1.754mA
i
2
= I
L
,
therefore I
L
= 1.754mA
3238O 980O
462O
2162O
i
1
i
2
Nodal analysis,
At node V
,
V = 2.53V
I
L
=
= 1.755mA
%difference =
||
100% %difference =
||
100%
= 0.06% = 0.11%
The value of I
L
calculated from Mesh analysis and Nodal analysis is 1.754mA and 1.755mA
respectively, their %difference are 0.06 % and 0.11% respectively. The value of I
L
calculated
form Mesh analysis and Nodal analysis is approximately the same with the value of I
L
from
Part 1 (b).
3238O 980O
462O
2162O
V
Measurement
V
L
(measured) = 0.818V
I
L
(calculated from V
L
) =
=1.770mA
% difference of I
L
=
||
100%
= 0.97%
The value of
I
L
from measurement is 1.770mA. The % difference of I
L
is 0.97% which shows
that the values are approximately the same.
Determining the R
Th
and E
Th
Table 1
Calculated Values
of E
Th
and R
Th
[ For Part 1(a)]
Measured Values
of E
Th
and R
Th
[ For Part 1(e) and 1(f)]
% Difference
E
Th
= 4.8V
E
Th
=4.83V
||
100% = 0.62%
R
Th
=2.320kO
R
Th
= 2.281kO
||
100% = 1.68%
Part 2 Maximum Power Transfer (Validating the Condition R
L
= R
Th
)
Table 2
R
1
(measured) = 325.3O
R
L
V
L
L
L
R
V
=
2
(mW)
0O 0 V 0 mW
50O 1.046V 21.88 mW
100O 1.798V 32.33 mW
200O 2.991V 44.73 mW
300O 3.767V 47.30 mW
400O 4.370V 47.74 mW
600O 5.140V 44.03 mW
800O 5.640V 39.76 mW
1000O 6.000V 36.00 mW
Graph of P
L
versus R
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
P(mW)
R (O)
- Refer to Graph 1, the value of R
L
resulted in maximum power transfer is 330O.
% difference =
||
100%
= 0.00%
Therefore, we can conclude that the theoretical value of R
L
and the measured value of
R
L
is the same since there is no % difference. R
L
= R
TH
.
- E is the power supply, E is remain constant. Whereas V
L
will increase when R
L
increases but the value of V
L
will never greater or equal to E.
- The measured value of V
L
under maximum power transfer condition is 4.04V.
% different =
||
100%
= 1.00%
The % different of V
L
by calculation and measurement is 1.00%.
Discussion
Based on Part 1 of the experiment, it is found that the experiment value of I
L
has only
a percentage different of 0.97% from the calculated value, which shows that the values are
approximately the same. Moreover, the E
Th
value has only a percentage difference of 0.62%,
whereby the R
Th
value has a percentage difference of 1.68%. The calculated values are
slightly different from the experimental values due to some minor experimental error that
might have occurred during the experiment. Thus, verifying Thevenins theorem.
In Part 2 of the experiment, a graph of P
L
against R
L
was plotted to analyse the
relationship between P
L
and R
L
. From the graph, it is found that when the resistor value of
R
L
increase the power, P
L
dissipated from the resistor also increases until it reaches a peak at
330O. After 330O, the P
L
starts decreasing when R
L
is increasing. Since the peak of P
L
is at
330O, therefore we can say that, that is the maximum power transfer. According to the
condition of maximum power transfer where R
L
= R
TH
, thus the value obtain from the result
was compared to the calculated value by calculating its percentage difference which gives no
percentage difference at all. In this set up, E is the power supply, so E is remained constant.
Whereas V
L
will increase when R
L
increases but the value of V
L
will never greater or equal to
E. The measured value of V
L
under maximum power transfer condition is 4.04V and gives a
percentage difference of 1.00% from the calculated value. Hence, we can say that the
maximum power transfer condition when R
L
= R
TH
is demonstrated.
Throughout the experiment, the experimental values are deviated from the calculated
values due to some errors. For example, the connecting wires used are not equal in length and
diameter, thus the internal resistance might slightly differ from one another. Although, the
resistance of the wires are often negligible, but most of the wires are quite long and thick,
which may led to the slight percentage difference between the experimental and calculated
values. Besides, the potentiometer used for this experiment is very sensitive causing it to be
very hard to adjust it to get the exact resistance. Therefore, for some cases, when the values
adjusted is only 1 or 2 unit away from the exact value, we will assume that, that is the value.
Consequently, leading to a slight percentage difference because the resistance value we get is
not precise and accurate. Moreover, as we are running current through the circuit for a period
of time, the currents might have slightly increased the temperature of the circuits, causing
slight increase in its resistance value. Hence, the percentage difference are small and can be
said to be approximately the same.
Conclusion
From the experiment, the percentage difference between the calculated value and the
experimental are very small. Thus, can be concluded as approximately the same. Hence,
Thevenins theorem is verified and the condition of maximum power transfer where R
L
= R
TH
is demonstrated.