This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of pre-treatment leukocyte differential counts and the prediction of endometrial cancer using leukocyte markers. Results: Mean white blood cell (wbc) counts were 6676 (6440-6913) cells / mL in endometriac cancer patients compared to 5663 (5542-5784) cells /mL in healthy controls (P 0.001) area under curve (aUC) for CA125 was 0.689 with a
This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of pre-treatment leukocyte differential counts and the prediction of endometrial cancer using leukocyte markers. Results: Mean white blood cell (wbc) counts were 6676 (6440-6913) cells / mL in endometriac cancer patients compared to 5663 (5542-5784) cells /mL in healthy controls (P 0.001) area under curve (aUC) for CA125 was 0.689 with a
This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of pre-treatment leukocyte differential counts and the prediction of endometrial cancer using leukocyte markers. Results: Mean white blood cell (wbc) counts were 6676 (6440-6913) cells / mL in endometriac cancer patients compared to 5663 (5542-5784) cells /mL in healthy controls (P 0.001) area under curve (aUC) for CA125 was 0.689 with a
Pre-treatment diagnosis of endometrial cancer through a
combination of CA125 and multiplication of neutrophil
and monocyte Bo Wook Kim 1 , Young Eun Jeon 1 , Hanbyoul Cho 1 , Eun Ji Nam 2 , Sang Wun Kim 2 , Sunghoon Kim 2 , Young Tae Kim 2 and Jae-Hoon Kim 1 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, and 2 Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Koreajog_1694 48..56 Abstract Aim: This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of pre-treatment leukocyte differential counts and the prediction of endometrial cancer using leukocyte markers. Material and Methods: Medical records of 238 women with pathologically conrmed endometrial cancer between March 2000 and June 2009 at two Korean hospitals were reviewed and compared to 596 healthy people visiting the Health Promotion Center in Gangnam Severance Hospital. For all study subjects, leukocyte differential counts and CA125 levels in serum obtained prior to operation were recorded. Multiplication of neutrophil and monocyte (MNM) was determined by multiplying neutrophil and monocyte counts then dividing by 10 000. Differences between endometrial cancer patients and healthy controls were compared. The sensitivity and specicity for each marker as well as the combined use of CA125 and other leukocyte markers were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Mean white blood cell (WBC) counts were 6676 (64406913) cells/mL in endometrial cancer patients compared to 5663 (55425784) cells/mL in healthy controls (P < 0.001). The area under curve (AUC) for CA125 was 0.689 with a sensitivity of 49.13%and specicity of 83.1%using an optimal cut-off value of 18.7 U/mL. The AUC for MNM was 0.696 with a sensitivity of 62.9% and specicity of 69.1%. The combination of CA125 and MNM showed a higher AUC of 0.760 than use of CA125 or MNM alone. Conclusion: The combination of MNM and CA125 is a simple and cost-effective method for predicting endometrial cancer. Key words: CA 125, endometrial cancer, leukocyte, monocyte, neutrophil. Introduction Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common malig- nancy in women and the most common in the female genital tract in the USA. 7780 deaths resulting from endometrial cancer were expected, while 42 160 women were estimated to be newly diagnosed in 2009. 1 Vaginal bleeding commonly occurs in the early stage of endometrial cancer. Because patients usually visit medical institutions during this stage, an early diagno- sis can be made in most cases. In some cases of endome- trial cancer, however, asymptomatic metastasis is found in the lymph node or intra-abdominal space, of which prognosis is commonly poor. Regardless, in cases in Received: March 23 2011. Accepted: April 27 2011. Reprint request to: Dr Jae-Hoon Kim, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 146-92 Dogok-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 135-720, Korea. Email: jaehoonkim@yuhs.ac doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01694.x J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. Vol. 38, No. 1: 4856, January 2012 48 2011 The Authors Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology which the presence of endometrial cancer is suspected due to the presence of bleeding, it is necessary to perform a non-invasive test prior to invasive tests, such as an endometrial biopsy. In high-risk patients, such as breast cancer patients taking tamoxifen, patients who are severely obese, patients with diabetes mellitus or those with heredi- tary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) syndrome, a cost-effective screening test may be helpful for early detection of endometrial cancer. Sonography and endometrial biopsy are recommended for diagnosis of endometrial cancer. To date, however, effective sero- logical markers have not been introduced. Elevated serum CA125 levels have been detected in 1020% of patients with early-stage disease and approximately 25% of patients with asymptomatic recurrent dis- ease. 2,3 Moreover, serum CA125 elevation greater than 35 U/mL is not sufciently accurate to stratify patient risk and the prognostic cut-off value for CA125 levels to guide other therapeutic plans is undened. 4,5 Other biomarkers, including CA 199, M-CSF, insulin and leptin have been studied, but they are less clinically effective. 69 It is well established that in cases in which unop- posed estrogen is persistently present, the endome- trium can progress to endometrial cancer due to excessive proliferation and resultant DNA damage. Recently, inammation and elevated leukocyte count have shown proven associations with various can- cers of the lung, breast, ovary, colon and liver. 1015 Such cytokines associated with inammation as COX-2, PGE2 and NF-kB have been reported at a higher concentration in endometrial cancer. 16 Accord- ing to a prospective study, white blood cell (WBC) counts were relatively higher in the endometrial cancer of postmenopausal women. 17 It can therefore be inferred that the development of endometrial cancer is associated with the inammatory and immune responses. Recently, diagnostic and prognos- tic tumor markers using leukocytes subsets have been reported, with the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and multiplication of neutrophil and monocyte counts (MNM) being recently introduced in various cancers. 15,1820 The present study aimed to investigate the clinical value of pre-treatment leukocyte differential counts and its diagnostic and prognostic importance in endometrial cancer. We hypothesized that leukocyte count differences between endometrial cancer pati- ents and healthy women could be found, and these differences may be useful indices of diagnostic and prognostic markers for endometrial cancer, especially in combination with CA-125. Material and Methods Study population The present study was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Institute of Review Boards (IRBs # 3-2009-0161) of Severance and Gangnam Sev- erance Hospitals. The study involved a retrospective medical record review of 238 women with pathologi- cally conrmed endometrial cancer between March 2000 and June 2009 at two Korean academic institu- tions. All endometrial cancer patients were surgically staged according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. Recurrence status was determined using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Healthy controls consisted of 596 women visiting the Health Promotion Center in Gangnam Severance Hospital between June 2007 and June 2009 with no history of cancer or gynecological disease. WBC counts and CA125 level for healthy controls were collected from retrospective medical records. There were no abnor- malities in the laboratory examinations or gynecologi- cal sonography, and participants with a history of hematological abnormality were excluded. Hematological analysis For all study subjects, peripheral venous blood was collected 3 days before operation for leukocyte differ- ential counts and CA125 levels. While the interval of endometrial biopsy to staging surgery was less than 2 weeks, WBC counts prior to endometrial biopsy were selected because endometrial biopsy can affect WBC count elevation. Leukocyte differential counts were analyzed by the ADIVA 120/2120 Hematology system (Bayer Health Care, Diagnostics Division, Tarrytown, NY, USA), and CA125 levels were mea- sured with CA125 II ECLIA (electrochemilumines- cence immunoassay) on the Roche/Hitachi Modular Analytics E170 (Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). Calculated leukocyte markers were NLR and MNM. The NLR was dened as the absolute neutrophil count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count. 19 The MNM was dened as the multiplication of neu- trophil counts and monocyte counts then divided by 10 000. 18 Diagnosis of endometrial cancer 2011 The Authors 49 Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Statistical analysis Data were summarized with number of patients, mean SD and 95% condence intervals (CI) for the mean. Comparisons of leukocyte counts between the two study groups were analyzed using independent t-test and ANOVA post hoc test. To evaluate the odds ratios (OR) for development of endometrial cancer, binary logistic regression was applied. For construction of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, a predicted probability for development of endometrial cancer was calculated for each patient using the logistic regression formula. Sensitivity and specicity for each marker were assessed using ROC curves, with the resulting area under the curve (AUC) indicating average sensitivity of a marker over the entire ROC curve. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically signicant. Results Patient characteristics of 238 endometrial cancers are shown in Table 1. The majority of patients had early- stage, favorable histological cell type and risk factors. Meanages of endometrial cancer patients andhealthy controls were 52.1 years and 50.7 years, respectively, with no signicant difference between the groups (Table 2). Mean CA 125 of controls and endometrial cancer patients were 14.1 and 42.0 U/mL (P < 0.001), respectively. WBC counts were 6676 cells/mL in the endometrial cancer group and 5663 cells/mL in healthy controls (P < 0.001). Neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte differential counts (4023, 2033 and 319 cells/ mL, respectively) were signicantly higher in endome- trial cancer patients when compared to controls (P < 0.001); however, eosinophil and basophil differen- tial counts did not show signicant difference (P = 0.64 and P = 0.523, respectively). NLR and MNM signi- cantly differed between the two groups (2.27 vs 1.91 [P = 0.012] and 134.6 vs 86.8 [P < 0.001], respectively). Table 3 shows leukocyte differentials according to pathological characteristics in endometrial cancer patients. Neutrophil counts, MNM and CA125 were increased in the advanced stage of cancer (P = 0.033, 0.016 and 0.041, respectively). Monocyte counts were elevated in positive peritoneal cytology (P = 0.013). Table 4 shows OR for the association of leukocyte differentials, NLR, MNM, andCA125 with endometrial cancer using binary logistic regression. WBC counts including their subsets revealed increased OR in devel- opment of endometrial cancer as leukocyte levels increased. Elevated MNM and CA125 35 U/mL also showed an increased OR. Table 5 discloses the diagnostic sensitivity and speci- city of CA 125, neutrophil, monocyte subsets, NLR, MNM and marker combinations. The AUC of CA125 was 0.689 with a sensitivity of 49.1% and specicity of 83.1%. For monocyte, the AUC was 0.706 with 55.0% sensitivity and 77.3% specicity. As single markers, the AUC of monocyte was higher than CA125, neutrophil and MNM. When markers were combined, CA125 and monocyte presented the highest AUC of 0.785 with 64.5% sensitivity and 79.8% specicity. The combina- tion of CA125 and MNM produced an AUC of 0.760 with 71.7% sensitivity and 69.6% specicity. Figure 1 illustrates composite analysis of MNM and CA125 levels in patients with endometrial cancer and Table 1 Patient characteristics of 238 endometrial cancers Frequency % Age 52.1 FIGO stage I 192 80.7 II 17 7.1 III 21 8.8 IV 8 3.4 Total 238 100 Tumor grade 1 122 52.8 2 75 32.5 3 34 14.7 Total 231 100 Myometrial inltration <50 200 84.0 >50 38 16.0 Total 238 100 Cervical stromal invasion Negative 217 91.6 Positive 20 8.4 Total 237 100 LVSI Negative 197 83.1 Positive 40 16.9 Total 237 100 Peritoneal cytology Negative 207 93.2 Positive 15 6.8 Total 222 100 Histological type Endometrioid 186 78.2 Non-endometrioid 52 21.8 Total 238 100 Mean value. FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion. B. W. Kim et al. 50 2011 The Authors Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology healthy controls. In endometrial cancer patients, CA125 was not elevated in 186 (78.1%) of 238 patients. Of these 186 patients who were false negative for CA125, 116 (62.3%) showed a positive MNM cut-off value of 100.1, which maximized the sum of sensitivity and specicity. Discussion Routine screening methods for endometrial cancer are not yet proven. Transvaginal sonography and endome- trial biopsy are recommended to diagnose endome- trial cancer in postmenopausal bleeding or high-risk patients. Hematological marker has not been intro- duced to diagnose endometrial cancer in such patients. CA125 has limitation to diagnose because of sensitivity. However, less invasive andcost-effective hematological marker couldbe helpful todiagnose endometrial cancer in such patients. In the current study, we observed that neutrophil and monocyte counts were elevated in endometrial cancer. The MNM, which was a combina- tion of two parameters, showed a similar AUC of CA125 alone. However, the combination of CA125 and MNM showed higher diagnostic accuracy than single markers, CA125 or MNM. CA125 is insufcient to diagnose endometrial cancer due to low sensitivity; however, MNM was shown to complement CA125. Transvaginal sonography for diagnosis of endome- trial cancer in postmenopausal women produced 9096% sensitivity and 5461% specicity with a 5-mm cut-off value. 2123 In the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), trans- vaginal sonography to predict endometrial cancer showed 80.5% sensitivity and 85.7% in postmeno- pausal women with a 5-mm cut-off value. 24 Although this study included endometrial hyperplasia and was not designed for endometrial cancer, it showed favor- able sensitivity in postmenopausal women. Biological marker in our study showed lower diagnostic power than sonography as a single marker. However, biologi- cal marker could complement the low positive predic- tive value of sonography and be a useful marker for detecting recurrence depending on markers. Chronic inammation has been reported to have a relationship with malignancy of epithelial origin. 25 Chronic inammation featuring elevated WBC is associated with cancer development and progression in bladder, cervical, gastric, intestinal, esophageal, ovarian, prostate andthyroidcancers. 2630 Ingynecologi- cal cancers, ovarian and cervical cancer have revealed elevated whole blood cells counts, including elevated neutrophil and monocyte counts. 15,18,31 Margolis et al. reported that elevated WBC counts were observed in endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women as well as in breast, colorectal and lung cancer. 17 In the current study, meanleukocyte counts, includingneutrophil and monocyte counts, were more elevated in the endome- trial cancer groupthaninhealthy controls, as they are in other gynecological cancers. In cases of colorectal, ovarian and cervical cancer, NLR and MNM have been reported to be high, 15,18,19 as they were in our study. Although the mechanisms by which neutrophil and monocyte counts increase in cancer are not fully understood, tumor cells secrete various cytokines and chemokines, and these cells are eventually involved in the proliferation of leuko- cytes, including neutrophils and monocytes. The toxic granule of neutrophilic cytoplasm attacks the cancer Table 2 Mean counts of leukocyte subsets, NLR, MNM and combination markers in the study subjects Mean (95% CI) P-value Control (n = 596) Endometrial cancer (n = 238) Age 50.7 (50.151.4) 52.1 (50.553.2) 0.06 CA125 14.1 (13.314.9) 42.0 (31.152.8) <0.001 WBC (cells/mL) 5663 (55425784) 6676 (64406913) <0.001 Neutrophil (cells/mL) 3300 (32033396) 4023 (38214226) <0.001 Lymphocyte (cells/mL) 1826 (17841867) 2033 (19472120) <0.001 Monocyte (cells/mL) 248 (242255) 319 (305333) <0.001 Eosinophil (cells/mL) 141 (131151) 133 (116150) 0.38 Basophil (cells/mL) 36 (3538) 36.1 (3239) 0.54 NLR 1.91 (1.841.98) 2.27 (20.12.50) <0.001 MNM 86.8 (82.691.0) 134.6 (124.0145.3) <0.001 Probability of a difference between mean leukocyte differential counts of endometrial cancer and control groups by independent t-test. MNM, multiplication of monocyte and neutrophil counts then divided by 10 000; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; WBC, white blood cells. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer 2011 The Authors 51 Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology cells, which is considered one of the immunological defense mechanisms. However, neutrophilic releases of vascular endothelial growth factor and IL-8 are con- tributors to cancer related angiogenesis. 32 Normally, monocytes are present in peripheral blood and differ- entiate into dendritic cells or macrophages in tissue by inuence of chemokines and cytokines in inam- mation or tumor development. Tumor-associated Table 3 Leukocyte differentials, NLR, MNM and CA125 according to pathological characteristics in the endometrial cancer group Mean (95% CI) WBC Neutrophil Lymphocyte Monocyte NLR MNM CA125 All patients (n = 238) 6676 4023 2033 319 2.27 134.6 42.0 (64406913) (38214226) (19472120) (305333) (20.12.50) (124.0145.3) (31.152.8) Stage I-II (n = 208) 6596 3906 2062 314 2.19 127.4 35.9 (63636829) (37134099 ) (19682155) (300329) (1.952.43) (117.3137.4) (25.346.4) III-IV (n = 30) 7238 4835 1851 350 2.86 183.6 83.7 (63248152) (40055665) (16432059) (305396) (2.213.52) (139.4227.8) (38.9128.5) P-value 0.174 0.033 0.110 0.088 0.053 0.016 0.041 Grade 1 (n = 122) 6487 3850 2069 316 2.10 125.4 121 (61846789) (35984102) (19532185) (298334) (1.832.37) (113.3137.4) (23.651.7) 2 (n = 75) 6857 4113 2019 322 2.29 141.5 73 (64067307) (37404486) (18612176) (294351) (1.982.59) (118.6164.4) (27.076.2) 3 (n = 34) 7025 4448 1998 329 2.60 153.7 33 (63697682) (38605036) (17372259) (296362) (1.923.28) (125.0182.3) (20.862.6) P-value 0.190 0.108 0.806 0.222 0.222 0.139 0.546 Myometrial inltration, % <50 (n = 200) 6607 4007 2024 318 2.30 133.2 38.6 (63626853) (37934221) (19292118) (302333) (2.042.56) (122.0144.4) (27.549.8) 50 (n = 38) 7041 4108 2094 325 2.16 140.9 59.9 (63547729) (35494668) (18792309) (291359) (1.762.56) (110.7171.2) (24.295.6) P-value 0.178 0.713 0.557 0.695 0.663 0.597 0.160 Cervical stromal invasion No (n = 217) 6615 3944 2054 317 2.20 130.5 36.3 (63786853) (37464142) (19622145) (303331) (1.972.43) (120.0141.0) (26.346.4) Yes (n = 20) 7217 4758 1825 335 3.07 173.1 78.0 (61998234) (37665750) (15642086) (275395) (1.944.20) (121.4224.9) (33.3122.7) P-value 0.157 0.108 0.147 0.482 0.130 0.107 0.071 LVSI No (n = 197) 6615 3931 2051 318 2.19 130.3 36.7 (63706860) (37284134) (19572146) (302333) (1.952.43) (119.3141.3) (25.348.0) Yes (n = 40) 6997 4475 1972 323 2.69 154.4 68.1 (63067688) (38325118) (17542190) (289356) (2.023.36) (122.7186.0) (35.9100.2) P-value 0.227 0.110 0.498 0.785 0.166 0.154 0.069 Peritoneal cytology Negative (n = 207) 6691 4003 2054 314 2.25 131.2 36.0 (64466935) (37964210) (19612147) (299328) (2.012.50) (120.5142.0) (26.145.9) Positive (n = 15) 7178 4837 1834 386 2.95 200.6 96.6 (58098546) (35576117) (15392129) (314458) (1.933.97) (130.2270.9) (14.9178.3) P-value 0.322 0.189 0.223 0.013 0.15 0.055 0.136 Histological type Endometrioid (n = 168) 6696 4012 2054 323 2.20 135.7 44.4 (64296963) (37894235) (19572151) (307339) (1.992.41) (123.6147.8) (30.957.9) Non-endometrioid (n = 52) 6608 4063 1967 303 2.56 129.9 33.5 (61247093) (36064520) (17782157) (277329) (1.843.28) (108.3151.5) (20.246.8) P-value 0.760 0.836 0.413 0.235 0.340 0.654 0.413 Cells/mL. LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; MNM, multiplication of monocyte and neutrophil counts then divided by 10 000; NLR, neutrophil/ monocyte ratio; WBC, white blood cells. B. W. Kim et al. 52 2011 The Authors Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology macrophages (TAM) derived from monocytes are a substantial component of inammatory inltrates in neoplastic tissues. TAM have two contrary roles in tumor conditions. First, they kill neoplastic cells by activation from IL-2, interferon and IL-12. Second, TAM produce various potent angiogenic growth factors, cytokines and proteases to potentiate tumor progression. 2630 In colorectal, ovarian, gastric and pancreatic cancers, increased neutrophil counts and decreased lymphocyte Table 4 Odds ratios for the association of leukocyte differentials, NLR, MNM, and CA125 with endometrial cancer Range No. cases OR (95% CI) P-value WBC <4000 444 1.00 (reference) 40006000 278 2.67 (1.903.78) <0.001 >6000 112 5.22 (3.358.14) <0.001 Neutrophil
<4000 558 1.00 (reference)
40006000 231 2.13 (1.532.98) <0.001 <6000 45 5.82 (3.0910.99) <0.001 Lymphocyte <2000 506 1.00 (reference) 20003000 286 1.57 (1.142.17) 0.006 >3000 42 4.29 (2.258.17) <0.001 Monocyte <200 190 1.00 (reference) 200300 362 2.19 (1.333.62) <0.001 >300 282 6.30 (3.8410.33) <0.001 NLR <2.0 526 1.00 (reference) 2.03.0 212 1.26 (0.881.78) 0.204 >3.0 96 1.70 (1.082.69) 0.022 MNM <100 476 1.00 (reference) 100200 289 3.04 (2.184.25) <0.001 >200 69 7.37 (4.3012.62) <0.001 CA125 <35 U/mL 764 1.00 (reference) >35 U/mL 66 8.28 (4.7014.60) <0.001 Cells/mL. MNM, multiplication of monocyte and neutrophil counts then divided by 10 000; NLR, neutrophil/monocyte ratio; OR, odds ratio; WBC, white blood cells. Table 5 Diagnostic sensitivity and specicity of CA125, neutrophil, monocyte subset, NLR, and MNM in endometrial cancer AUC Sensitivity (%) Specicity (%) P-value CA125 (18.7 U/mL) 0.689 49.1 83.1 <0.001 Neutrophil 0.641 79.4 23.7 <0.001 Monocyte 0.706 55 77.3 <0.001 NLR 0.539 51.2 59.1 0.076 MNM 0.696 62.9 69.1 <0.001 CA125 + MNM 0.76 71.7 69.6 <0.001 CA125 + Neutrophil 0.721 73.5 59.5 <0.001 CA125 + Monocyte 0.785 64.5 79.8 <0.001 CA125 + NLR 0.689 49.5 82 <0.001 Neutrophil + Monocyte 0.668 62.8 65.9 <0.001 AUC, area under curve; MNM, multiplication of monocyte and neutrophil counts then divided by 10 000; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer 2011 The Authors 53 Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology counts have been reported. Consequently, the increased NLR was related with poor prognosis. 15,19,20,33 In the current study, however, NLR was less elevated than MNM. Lymphocyte counts have a tendency to decrease withdisease progerssion, resultinginlower levels inthe advanced stage of cancer. However, the biological behaviors of cancers may differ between anatomic sites. 87.8% of the endometrial cancers in the current study were early stage. Further, it is difcult to analyze the survival rate due to low recurrence and death rate. Therefore, NLR may not be useful in early-stage endometrial cancer. In the present study, we have shown that MNM has greater diagnostic accuracy than NLR. Another mechanism of endometrial cancer develop- ment is chronic inammation induced by hormonal imbalance. In premenopausal women, the endome- trium goes through the cycles of rapid growth, remod- eling, differentiation and angiogenesis. Estrogen inuences endometrial growth by growth factors and cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-a. 3436 Unopposed estrogen where there is a lack of the protective proges- terone triggers excessive mitosis and proliferation of endomertrial cells, leading to DNA mutation. These phenomena have beenwell describedinthe progression to cancer development. During the menstrual cycle, the endometrium is exposed to physiologically chronic inammatory-like processes. 37 Exposure to excessive estrogen leads to secretion of cytokines which are asso- ciated with cancer progression. Obesity, a risk factor for endometrial cancer, causes a chronic inammatory con- dition due to elevation of serum levels of C-reactive protein, IL-6, TNF-a, and leptin, which are known markers of inammation. 38 Progesterone, the antagonist of estrogen, inhibits cytokine-induced transcription of COX-2 and stimu- lates prostaglandin dehydrogenase, an enzyme that breaks down prostaglandins. 39,40 COX-2 protein levels are elevated in patients with endometrial cancer cells. By inhibiting COX-2, progesterone can interfere with cell proliferation and the invasion ability of endome- trial cancer, leading to apotosis. 41 Accordingly, PGE2 induced by COX-2 is elevated in malignant endome- trial epithelial carcinomas. 16 Progesterone provides anti-inammatory activity against these molecules. While unoposed estrogen and insufcient progester- one persistes, the endometrium undergoes inamma- tory, proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects, which are precursors of malignancy. Although chronic endometritis has not been proven to be associated with endometrial cancer, chronic endometritis has been reported to be related with endometrial hyperplasia in animals. 42,43 Endometrial hyperplasia-pyometra complex is a common disease in animals. 44 In human cases, chronic endometritis could arise fromnon-hormonal use. Non-hormonal intrauter- ine device (IUD) has a function to prevent sperm reaching the ovum by local inammation. Most non- hormonal IUD induce mild inammation that does not pose a clinical problem and are accepted as effective and safe. Although non-hormonal IUD has not been proven to be associated with endometrial cancer, some non-hormonal IUDusers develop chronic endometritis and are suggested to be related with endometrial hyperplasia, the precursor of endometrial cancer. 45 When abnormal prolonged bleeding from non- hormonal use occurs, it is recommended that endome- trial biopsy and removal is performed. It should be investigated whether or not endometrial cancer devel- ops from endometrial hyperplasia arising in chronic endometritis. The limitation of the present study is that leukocyte markers are not specic to endometrial cancer. Inam- mation arises from various conditions, such as infec- tion, autoimmune disease and malignancy. More 400 300 200 100 0 1 10 35 CA125 M M M 100 Healthy control Endometrial Cancer 600 Figure 1 Composite analysis of multiplication of neutro- phil and monocyte counts (MNM) and CA125 levels in patients with endometrial cancer () and healthy con- trols (). Dotted line indicates cut-off value (35 U/mL) of CA125 and solid line indicates optimal cut-off value (100.1) of MNM that maximizes the sum of sensitivity and specicity. B. W. Kim et al. 54 2011 The Authors Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology advanced cases of endometrial cancer are required to disclose correlations between leukocyte markers and prognosis. The present study demonstrates that the combination of MNMand CA125 has signicantly higher diagnostic accuracy than single use of CA125 in endometrial cancer. A major advantage of using changes in leuko- cyte differential counts is that these counts can be easily obtained from nearly all patients by routine complete blood counts (CBC) with no additional costs or testing. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Minis- try of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (NRF-2008314-E00121), 311-2006-2-E00339 and 2010- 0011153; by a faculty research grant of the Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2010(6-2010-0110); and a grant funded by Sano-Aventis Korea and Cheil Jedang (CJ). References 1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225249. 2. Duk JM, Aalders JG, Fleuren GJ, de Bruijn HW. CA 125: A useful marker in endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 10971102. 3. Niloff JM, Klug TL, Schaetzl E, Zurawski VR Jr, Knapp RC, Bast RC Jr. Elevation of serum CA125 in carcinomas of the fallopian tube, endometrium, and endocervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 10571058. 4. Hsieh CH, ChangChien CC, Lin H et al. Can a preoperative CA 125 level be a criterion for full pelvic lymphadenectomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer? Gynecol Oncol 2002; 86: 2833. 5. Sood AK, Buller RE, Burger RA, Dawson JD, Sorosky JI, Berman M. Value of preoperative CA 125 level in the man- agement of uterine cancer and prediction of clinical outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 441447. 6. Takeshima N, Shimizu Y, Umezawa S et al. Combined assay of serum levels of CA125 and CA19-9 in endometrial carci- noma. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 54: 321326. 7. Cymbaluk A, Chudecka-Glaz A, Rzepka-Gorska I. Leptin levels in serum depending on Body Mass Index in patients with endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136: 7477. 8. Olt G, Soper J, Ramakrishnan S et al. Preoperative evaluation of macrophage colony-stimulating factor levels in patients with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1316 1319. 9. OMara BA, Byers T, Schoenfeld E. Diabetes mellitus and cancer risk: A multisite case-control study. J Chronic Dis 1985; 38: 435441. 10. Altinoz MA, Korkmaz R. NF-kappaB, macrophage migration inhibitory factor and cyclooxygenase-inhibitions as likely mechanisms behind the acetaminophen and NSAID pre- vention of the ovarian cancer. Neoplasma 2004; 51: 239247. 11. Ardies CM. Inammation as cause for scar cancers of the lung. Integr Cancer Ther 2003; 2: 238246. 12. Bartsch H, Nair J. Oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation- derived DNA-lesions in inammation driven carcinogenesis. Cancer Detect Prev 2004; 28: 385391. 13. Triantallidis JK, Nasioulas G, Kosmidis PA. Colorectal cancer and inammatory bowel disease: Epidemiology, risk factors, mechanisms of carcinogenesis and prevention strate- gies. Anticancer Res 2009; 29: 27272737. 14. Van der Auwera I, Van Laere SJ, Van den Eynden GG et al. Increased angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in inamma- tory versus noninammatory breast cancer by real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR gene expression quantication. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 79657971. 15. Cho H, Hur HW, Kim SW et al. Pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is elevated in epithelial ovarian cancer and predicts survival after treatment. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2009; 58: 1523. 16. Tamura M, Sebastian S, Yang S et al. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin synthesis in endometrial stromal cells by malignant endometrial epi- thelial cells. A paracrine effect mediated by prostaglandin E2 and nuclear factor-kappa B. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 26208 26216. 17. Margolis KL, Rodabough RJ, Thomson CA, Lopez AM, McTiernan A. Prospective study of leukocyte count as a pre- dictor of incident breast, colorectal, endometrial, and lung cancer and mortality in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 18371844. 18. Cho H, Kim JH. Multiplication of neutrophil and monocyte counts (MNM) as an easily obtainable tumour marker for cervical cancer. Biomarkers 2009; 14: 161170. 19. Walsh SR, Cook EJ, Goulder F, Justin TA, Keeling NJ. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in colorec- tal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2005; 91: 181184. 20. Shimada H, Takiguchi N, Kainuma O et al. High preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2010; 13: 170176. 21. Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein V et al. Endo- vaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA 1998; 280: 15101517. 22. Gupta J, Chien P, Voit D, Clark T, Khan K. Ultrasonographic endometrial thickness for diagnosing endometrial pathology in women with postmenopausal bleeding: A meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 779816. 23. Timmermans A, Opmeer B, Khan K et al. Endometrial thick- ness measurement for detecting endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 160167. 24. Jacobs I, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M et al. Sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasound screening for endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women: A case-control study within the UKCTOCS cohort. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 3848. 25. Jaiswal M, LaRusso NF, Gores GJ. Nitric oxide in gastrointes- tinal epithelial cell carcinogenesis: Linking inammation to oncogenesis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2001; 281: G626G634. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer 2011 The Authors 55 Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 26. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inammation and cancer. Nature 2002; 420: 860867. 27. Goswami B, Rajappa M, Sharma M, Sharma A. Inammation: Its role and interplay in the development of cancer, with special focus on gynecological malignancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 591599. 28. Kundu JK, Surh YJ. Inammation: Gearing the journey to cancer. Mutat Res 2008; 659: 1530. 29. Lu H, Ouyang W, Huang C. Inammation, a key event in cancer development. Mol Cancer Res 2006; 4: 221233. 30. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inammation. Nature 2008; 454: 436444. 31. den Ouden M, Ubachs JM, Stoot JE, van Wersch JW. Whole blood cell counts and leucocyte differentials in patients with benign or malignant ovarian tumours. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 72: 7377. 32. Schaider H, Oka M, Bogenrieder T et al. Differential response of primary and metastatic melanomas to neutrophils attracted by IL-8. Int J Cancer 2003; 103: 335343. 33. Aliustaoglu M, Bilici A, Seker M et al. The association of pre- treatment peripheral blood markers with survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2010; 57: 640 645. 34. Jacobs AL, Sehgal PB, Julian J, Carson DD. Secretion and hormonal regulation of interleukin-6 production by mouse uterine stromal and polarized epithelial cells cultured in vitro. Endocrinology 1992; 131: 10371046. 35. Tazuke SI, Giudice LC. Growth factors and cytokines in endometrium, embryonic development, and maternal: Embryonic interactions. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1996; 14: 231245. 36. von Wolff M, Thaler CJ, Zepf C, Becker V, Beier HM, Strowitzki T. Endometrial expression and secretion of interleukin-6 throughout the menstrual cycle. Gynecol Endocrinol 2002; 16: 121129. 37. Modugno F, Ness RB, Chen C, Weiss NS. Inammation and endometrial cancer: Ahypothesis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14: 28402847. 38. Das UN. Is obesity an inammatory condition? Nutrition 2001; 17: 953966. 39. Ishihara O, Matsuoka K, Kinoshita K, Sullivan MH, Elder MG. Interleukin-1 beta-stimulated PGE2 production from early rst trimester human decidual cells is inhibited by dexamethasone and progesterone. Prostaglandins 1995; 49: 1526. 40. van der Burg B, van der Saag PT. Nuclear factor-kappa-B/ steroid hormone receptor interactions as a functional basis of anti-inammatory action of steroids in reproductive organs. Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2: 433438. 41. Yi Z, Jingting C, Yu Z. Proteomics reveals protein prole changes in cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor-treated endometrial cancer cells. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 326333. 42. Gumber S, Springer N, Wakamatsu N. Uterine endometrial polyp with severe hemorrhage and cystic endometrial hyperplasia-pyometra complex in a dog. J Vet Diagn Invest 2010; 22: 455458. 43. Bigliardi E, Parmigiani E, Cavirani S, Luppi A, Bonati L, Corradi A. Ultrasonographyandcystic hyperplasia-pyometra complex in the bitch. Reprod Domest Anim 2004; 39: 136140. 44. Fieni F. Clinical evaluation of the use of aglepristone, with or without cloprostenol, to treat cystic endometrial hyperplasia- pyometra complex in bitches. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 1550 1556. 45. Ozalp S, Kabukcuoglu S, Tanir H. Should endometrial hyper- plasia be regarded as a reason for abnormal uterine bleeding in users of the intrauterine contraceptive device? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003; 8: 1720. B. W. Kim et al. 56 2011 The Authors Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Copyright of Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.