1 | P a g e

DESIGN OF WINGS


By

MAYANK
(Reg No. 100933006)
3
rd
Semester





Department of Aeronautical Engineering
MIT, MANIPAL


2 | P a g e

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page no

1. Introduction 4
2.Study of wing Parameters and its design... . 5
2.1. Number of Wings 5
2.2.Vertical position relative to the fuselage(High, Mid or Low). 7
2.3. Horizontal position relative to fuselage. 9

2.4. Aerofoil........... 10

2.5. Aspect Ratio... 11

2.6. Taper Ratio. 15

2.7. wing loading 18

2.8. MAC........... 19

2.8. Wing Area 22

3. Conclusion 23
4. References...................................................................................................................... 24











3 | P a g e


ABSTRACT
Aerodynamics is the branch of dynamics concerned with
studying the motion of air, particularly when it interacts with a
moving object. This project deals with the wing design and the
parameters involved in a RC model which in turn helps to study this
motion.
This project is majorly concerned with the study, design and
implementation of the wing so as to acquire greater lift. The study of
the parameters includes the weight, height and length of the RC
model of the plane is to be carried out in this project. A great deal of
information regarding the lift, drag and weight is studied and
understood for the given specifications of RC model. The
information achieved is analysed using graphs and presented. The
advantages and disadvantages of the models are also discussed.









4 | P a g e



CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

What is aerodynamics? The word AERODYNAMICS comes from
two Greek words: aerios, concerning the air, and dynamics, which
means force. Aerodynamics is the study of forces and the resulting
motion of objects through the air. Judging from the story of Daedalus
and Icarus, humans have been interested in aerodynamics and flying
for thousands of years, although flying in a heavier-than-air machine
has been possible only in the last hundred years. Aerodynamics is the
way air moves around things. The rules of aerodynamics explain how
an airplane is able to fly. Anything that moves through air reacts to
aerodynamics. A rocket blasting off the launch pad and a kite in the
sky react to aerodynamics. Aerodynamics even acts on cars, since air
flows around cars. The work concentrated in the field of
aerodynamics specifies about the wing design in the RC model and
also its parameters.The wing gives the major contribution of the lift
for an aircraft to fly in the air. These configurations are presented and
are available in various open sources such as books, pdf's and online
documents. The study of the parameters includes weight, height,
length, breadth of a plane is designed with the RC model that helps in
improving greater lift, less drag, less weight.The main concern about
this RC model is in the study, design and implementation of the wings
for greater lift and is discussed along with wing parameters.


5 | P a g e



CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE SURVEY

2. Study of wing parameters and its design

2.1. Number of wings

Wing is a part of aircraft,which contributes more lift.There are two
types of wings that are studied in this design.

i. Monoplane - Is an aircraft with the one fixed wing.
ii. Biplane - Is an aircraft with two set of wings.

i.Monoplane
The design for the wing is considered much here in the monoplane.
The monoplane design has been universally adopted over multiplane
configuration because of airflow interference between adjacent wings
reduces efficiency.

i(a) Advantages
Fixed wing configuration.
Due to only one set of wings, the drag is less.
6 | P a g e

Weight is less, since monoplane has only one wing.
Smooth flow of air around the wing.
Load factor is high.
Small head resistance due to the entire absence of vertical
supporting post.
Load distribution is varying according to the section it makes
structurally advantage, due to dihedral configuration.
Cost effective as only one set of wings is present.

i(b) Disadvantages
Presence of only one set of wings makes the lift to be
comparatively less.

ii. Biplane
An aeroplane having two pairs of wings fixed at different levels,
especially one above and one below the fuselage.
ii(a) Advantages
Approximately more than 20% lift generating is achieved by the
biplane as compared with that of the monoplane.
Low induced drag.

ii(b) Disadvantages
The increase in drag due to the presence of two set of wings.
The upper wing and the lower wing heavily flow (downwards).
It will combine when having trailing edge of the wing. The
lower and upper wing drag is thus combined.
7 | P a g e

Biplane has a smaller span but larger length when compared to
that of a monoplane. Hence the load increases.
iii. Triplane
A triplane is a fixed-wing aircraft equipped with three vertically-
stacked wing planes.
iii(a) Disadvantages
Drag is more.
Weight is more.
Maneuverability is less.
Pressure distribution is comparatively less and pressure
interaction is more.

2.2. Vertical position relative to the fuselage (High, Mid or Low)
i. Low wing
Low wing is the configuration in which the wing is attached to the
lower part of the fuselage.
i(a) Advantages
The landing gear can be placed in the wing.
The flow of vortices will not either affect the vertical stabilizer
or the horizontal stabilizer.
The engine mount can be placed over the wing. So the thrust of
the engine will not affect the tail portion.
Dihedral angle can be introduced.
It can carry more load as it is directly attached to the fuselage
without the help of any truss and struts.
Better advantage of grounding effect.
8 | P a g e

Due to equal lift distribution from tip to tip, the speed will be
more.
The simple structure provides more manoeuvrability.

i(b) Disadvantages
The interaction between the fuselage and the wing tends to be
more.

ii. High Wing
High wing is the configuration in which the wing is attached to the
higher portion of the fuselage.
ii (a)Disadvantages
The down wash arising from the trailing edge of all the wings
affects the tail portion.
Low banking is achieved.
Low manoeuvrability is present.
Slower than low wing.
It is not more aerobatic.
The presence of vortices makes the tail load to be more.
Leads to poor visibility up and behind the plane.
iii. Mid Wing
The configuration where the wings are connected to the middle part of
the fuselage is known as mid wing configuration.
iii(a) Disadvantages
This configuration affects the tail portion.
The presence of mid wing leads to structural disadvantages.
9 | P a g e

The bending moment arising from the wing lift must be carried
through the fuselage in some manner.
The aircraft structure is heavier, due to the necessity of
reinforcing wing root at the intersection with the fuselage.
The mid wing is more expensive compared with high and low
wing configuration.

2.3. Horizontal position relative to fuselage
i. Dihedral Angle
When we look at the front view of an aircraft, the angle between the
chord-line plane of a wing with the xy plane is referred to as the
wing dihedral. The chord line plane of the wing is an imaginary plane
that is generated by connecting all chord lines across span. For the
purpose of aircraft symmetricity, both right and left sections of a wing
must have the same dihedral angle. There are several advantages and
disadvantages for dihedral angle. In this section, these characteristics
are introduced, followed by the design recommendations to determine
the dihedral angle.
The purpose of dihedral is to improve the aircraft stability during
flight. Dihedral angle is added to the wings for later or rolls stability.
When the aircraft encounters a slight roll displacement caused by
distribute from air stream or a gust of wind. An aircraft wings with
some dihedral will naturally return to its original position.

The front view of this wing shows that the left and right wing do not
lie in the same plane but meet at an angle. The aircrafts wing is
inclined upward an angle from root to tip. The angle that the wing
makes with the local horizontal is called the dihedral angle.
10 | P a g e

If the wing tip is higher than the xy plane, the angle is called positive
dihedral or simply dihedral, but when the wing tip is lower than the
xy plane, the angle is called negative dihedral or anhedral.

2.4. Aerofoil
The aerodynamic cross section of a body such as a wing that creates
lift as it moves through the air. The shape of airfoil strongly affects
the amount of lift.

NAME = NACA 1315-53, #Pts=71, Re=3000000

ReyN = 3000000



AOA Cl Cd Cm

-5

0.008 -0.018

-4 -0.362 0.0078 -0.019

-3 -0.24 0.0075 -0.02

-2 -0.118 0.0072 -0.02

-1 0.005 0.0071 -0.021

0 0.127 0.0068 -0.022

1 0.249 0.0071 -0.023

2 0.371 0.0073 -0.023

3 0.493 0.0071 -0.024

4 0.615 0.0075 -0.025

5 0.736 0.008 -0.026

6 0.858 0.0087 -0.026

7 0.979 0.0098 -0.027

8 1.097 0.0106 -0.028

9 1.191 0.0118 -0.029

10 1.268 0.0129 -0.03

11 | P a g e

11 1.329 0.0141 -0.03

12 1.375 0.0162 -0.031

13 1.406 0.018 -0.032

14 1.422 0.0198 -0.033

15 1.423 0.0219 -0.034

16 1.41 0.0242 -0.035




The above plot represents the curve between coefficient of lift
(C
L
) and angle of attack


The above plot represents the curve between the coefficient of
drag (C
D
) and coefficient of lift (C
L
)

-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
Series1
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Cd
Cd
12 | P a g e

2.5. Aspect Ratio
Aspect ratio is an indicator of the general performance of an aircraft
wing. In aerodynamics, the aspect ratio of a wing is defined as the
square of the span divided by the wing chord. It is a measure of how
long and slender a wing is from tip to tip. For high aspect ratio
aircraft wing indicates long, narrow wings, whereas a low aspect
ratio wing indicates short and stubby. Higher aspect ratio has the
effect of a higher rate of lift increase, as angle of attack increases,
than lower aspect ratio wings. The wing planform area with a
rectangular or straight tapered shape is defined as the span times the
mean aerodynamic chord. Thus, the aspect ratio shall be redefined as:

Several rectangular wings with the same platform area but
different aspect ratio.
13 | P a g e

The designer has infinite options to select the wing geometry. For
instance, consider an aircraft whose wing reference area has been
determined to be 30. A few design options are as follows:



A rectangular wing with a 30 m span and a 1 m chord (AR
=30)2.
A rectangular wing with a 20 m span and a 1.5 m chord (AR
=13.333)3.
A rectangular wing with a 15 m span and a 2 m chord (AR =
7.5)4.
A rectangular wing with a 10 m span and a 3 m chord (AR =
3.333)5.
A rectangular wing with a 7.5 m span and a 4 m chord (AR =
1.875)6.
A rectangular wing with a 6 m span and a 5 m chord (AR =
1.2)7.
A rectangular wing with a 3 m span and a 10 m chord (AR =
0.3)8.
A triangular (Delta) wing with a 20 m span and a 3 m root chord
(AR = 13.33; here to note that the wing has two sections (left
and right))9.
A triangular (Delta) wing with a 10 m span and a 6 m root chord
(AR = 3.33)
14 | P a g e



2.5.1 Aspect Ratio Affect on the Stall Angle of Attack of RC
Airplane
Let us now consider the effect of Aspect ratio on the Stall Angle of
Attack of RC Airplanes. Consider the graph below, on the x-axis is
Wing Angle of Attack in degrees and on the y-axis is the Wing Lift
Coefficient (C
L
). Lift curve of different RC Airplanes Wings are
drawn with increasing Aspect ratio.
Here to note, that the maximum Lift coefficient is considered the
same for all the RC Airplanes Wings with different Aspect Ratio.
From the graph, we can see that an RC Airplane with small Aspect
Ratio stalls at a higher Angle of Attack. On the other hand we can see
that when the Aspect Ratio of the RC Airplane Wing is increased the
wing stalls at a lower Angle of Attack.
So, from this we can conclude that a wing with a smaller value of
Aspect ratio stalls at a higher Angle of Attack and a wing with a
higher Aspect Ratio stalls at a lower value of angle of attack. Now,
we know that Aspect Ratio is defined as, (Wing Span*Wing Span) /
Wing Area or b
2
/S. When the value of Aspect Ratio is higher, the
wing reaches the maximum lift coefficient at a smaller angle of
15 | P a g e

attack. Further, increase of the angle of attack will cause the flow
separation and the wing will stall. When the aspect ratio is smaller,
higher values of angle of attack are required to achieve the maximum
lift coefficient and thus the wing stalls at a higher value of Angle of
Attack.

Triangular (Delta) wing with a 10 m span and a 6 m root chord (AR = 3.33)

2.6. Taper Ratio
The taper ratio of a wing is simply the tip chord divided by the root
chord. High aspect ratio wings with low taper ratio (tip chord much
less than root chord) are extremely prone to tip stalls so it is best to
avoid using both on the same wing.
If we want a highly tapered wing then we have to contribute the
aspect ratio. If we want a high aspect ratio wing then keep the taper
ratio closer to 1 (same root and tip chord).
Knowing the taper ratio, aspect ratio and wing area allows you to
calculate the root and tip chords assuming the wing does not have
multiple tapers. This definition is applied to the wing, as well as the
horizontal tail, and the vertical tail.
16 | P a g e

The geometric result of taper is a smaller tip chord. In general, the
taper ratio varies between zero and one. Three major planform
geometries relating to taper ratio are rectangular, trapezoidal and delta
shape which are presented. In general, a rectangular wing planform is
aerodynamically inefficient, while it has a few advantages, such as
performance, cost and ease to manufacture. A wing with a rectangular
planform has a larger downwash angle at the tip than at the root.
Therefore, the effective angle of attack at the tip is reduced compared
with that at the root. Thus, the wing tip will tend to stall later than the
root. The spanwise lift distribution is far from elliptical; where it is
highly desirable to minimize the induced drag. Hence, one of the
reasons to taper the planform is to reduce the induced drag.





In addition, since the tip chord is smaller than root chord, the tip
Reynolds number will be lower, as well as a lower tip induced
downwash angle. This is undesirable from the viewpoint of lateral
17 | P a g e

stability and lateral control. On the other hand, a rectangular wing
planform is structurally inefficient, since there is a lot of area
outboard, which supports very little lift. Wing taper will help resolve
this problem as well.


The above figure shows the wings with various taper ratios


The typical effect of taper ratio on lift distribution

18 | P a g e

2.6.1 Elliptical Wing
Elliptical wings are very efficient but difficult to build particularly
elliptical wings having elliptical thickness. Wood doesn't like
compound curves. Some designs get around this by adjusting the
airfoil (rib height) to create a straight taper in thickness from root to
tip which never looks right.
The way to build a wing easily while approaching the efficiency of an
elliptical wing is to build a taper wing.


2.7. Wing loading
Weight the model, fully assembled, in ounces. Include all
accessories normally used during a flight, such as fuel, batteries,
engine and propeller. We should be very careful about the
measurement to ensure the math turns out correctly.
Measure the wing dimensions (in inches).
Measure the wingspan (tip to tip) and the chord line (leading
edge to trailing edge).
If the wings taper down towards the wingtips, then we should
measure an average chord line about halfway from wing-root to
wingtip.
Determine the surface area of the model's main wings. For total
surface area in square inches, multiply wingspan times chord line.
Surface Area= (Wingspan) x (Chord line)
Divide the RC model's weight by the wing's total surface area to
obtain wing loading in ounces per square inch.
(Weight)/(Wing Area)=Wing Loading.
A good wing loading is .15 ounces per square inch, with anything
falling between .11 and .20 ounces per square inch being acceptable.

19 | P a g e




2.8. MAC
MAC is nothing but the abbreviation for mean aerodynamic chord.
MAC can be traced on a wing by using the following steps.
1. Measure the root and tip chord.



Then draw the following lines on the plans:
At the root of the wing, draw a line parallel to the centerline of
the fuselage extending forward from the leading edge and
20 | P a g e

rearward from the trailing edge. Both lines should be the length
of the tip chord.
Do the same thing at the tip but drawing the lines the length of
the root chord.
Connect the ends of the lines so that they create an "X" over the
wing panel. Where the two lines intersect is the spanwise
location of the Mean Aerodynamic Chord.
If the plan indicates that the CG should be located at some
percentage of the MAC, then measure the MAC and put the CG
the given percentage back from the leading edge along the
MAC. For example, if the MAC is 10" and the plan indicates
the CG should be 25% back from the leading edge, then the CG
is 2-1/2" back from the leading edge at the MAC.
This drawing will help us to visualize what we need to do:

21 | P a g e

The lines cross at the spanwise location of the MAC. It is not the
fore/aft CG location (unless the CG happens to be located at 50%
MAC).
The following formula will give the measurement (chord) of the
MAC. It does not give the span wise location of the MAC.
where
rc = Root Chord
t = Taper Ratio = (Tip Chord Root Chord)
MAC = rc x 2/3 x (( 1 + t + t
2
) ( 1 + t ))

Using the drawing above, let's say the root chord is 11" and the tip
chord is 6"
t = 6 11 = .5455
Now pluging into the formula to find the MAC. Here the point to
note that the wingspan and sweep do not matter. No matter what the
span or how much the wing is swept, the MAC will always be the
same length.
MAC = 11 x 2/3 x (( 1 + .5455 + .5455
2
) ( 1 + .5455 ))
MAC = 22/3 x ( 1.8431 1.5455 )
MAC = 7.3333 x ( 1.8431 1.5455)
MAC = 7.3333 x 1.19254
MAC = 8.7453"
My thanks to Alasdair Sutherland, author of Basic Aeronautics for
Modelers (Traplet Publications), for providing us with this
information.

22 | P a g e

2.9 Wing Area
It is better to determine the wing area based on the target wing
loading which is based on target weight. For this example we're
building a model to weigh 55lbs with a wing loading of 20 oz./ft
2
.
Plug those numbers into the wing loading equation to find the wing
area:
Given:
Wing Loading = 20 oz./ft
2

Target Weight = 55lbs
Find the Wing Area:
Wing Loading = (Weight x 2304) Wing Area

Rearrange the equation to find the wing area:
Wing Area = (Weight x 2304) Wing Loading
Plug in given parameters:
Wing Area = (55 x 2304) 20
Wing Area = 79.59in
2







23 | P a g e




CHAPTER 3
CONCLUSION

From the above studies and discussions, the most preferred wing
design for a RC plane will be a monoplane, low wing dihedral model.
The RC plane should be made monoplane as a monoplane offers less
drag and less weight when compared to other models. The dihedral
angle model is chosen as it will make the RC plane much more stable.
The low wing is preferred in this study over high wing and mid wing
because there is not much interference with the landing gear as it is
placed on the wing and also the selection of such a low wing model
provides a high aspect ratio to the plane. The simple structure of the
low wing model helps solving various manoeuvrability problems in
the plane. Taper ratio is chosen close to 1 so as to provide a high
aspect ratio plane. The studies finally also show how to calculate the
best wing area, wing loading and MAC to enable








24 | P a g e





CHAPTER 4
REFERENCES
1. John .D. Anderson Aircraft performance and design Tata
McGraw-Hill Education Edition 2010.
2. Ajoy Kumar Kundu Aircraft Design Cambridge Aerospace
series.
3. L.J Clancy,Aerodynamics.
4. Theodore A. Tally Introduction to the Aerodynamics of
flight NASA 1975.
5. www.wings.avkids.com/book
6. www.sdsefi.com
7. www.quest-global.com