Presentation of the experiences on a value based approach of public procurement, with the Best Value Procurement Method as example of how a procurement procedure could be create more focus on added value instead of lowest price.
Presentation of the experiences on a value based approach of public procurement, with the Best Value Procurement Method as example of how a procurement procedure could be create more focus on added value instead of lowest price.
Presentation of the experiences on a value based approach of public procurement, with the Best Value Procurement Method as example of how a procurement procedure could be create more focus on added value instead of lowest price.
Warszawa, May 23 th 2014 1 Projects Energy industry Infrastructure Research PhD research on EU public procurement law Effect of Quality in procurement procedures Consultancy Advisory / readiness reviews Education Tender evaluation Mediation J.H. Merema BBE LLM 2 dzie dobry! Long long time ago. building a canal Employers Request for Tender Both specifications and functional design Little procedural rules Whats so difficult? 3 Complex projects A lot of stakeholders Time is precious Environmental issues A lot of rules Innovative technology But nowdays 4 Contract authority (CA) has to follow tender procedures it is not a free zone CA has to accept the winning offer fear of a forced marriage CA is obligated to create a effective market place with level playing field and to stimulate fair competition CA has public governance to deal with instead of profit only Public values in a political system are often unpredictable and not always stable Why is public procurement so special? 5 During tender: the promise department (what the Client thinks he bought) CAs dilemma: A bid is a promise 6 CAs dilemma: fulfilling the promise? 7 After signing the contract: The sorry department (What the Client actually payed for) 1. Is the cheapest offer often the best solution for your needs? 2. Is the company who offers cheaply most of the time a expert and a good party to work with? Questions 8 No, because our experience is that it leads to: Focus on legal aspects and formalities Claims during procedure / after awarding (nr. 2) A lot of stress in project execution Projects take longer Projects become more expensive We dont want that! Answers 9 We look for best value by answering these questions: What is the best offer? Who is the best expert for the project? For contractors for public works We focus on the quality of the bid - MEAT For contractors and engineering services We focus on the quality of the bid - MEAT and on the level of expertise of the bidder - MEAT Essence of Value Based Procurement 10 We want to minimize risks from the beginning We try to identify the Expert Golden rule: we measure objectively! Experts have to be SMART in their bid Specific Measurable Achievable (and understandable) Result-oriented (description of what) Time tabled (description of when) Usage of EU restricted procedure, or EU competitive dialogue Best Value Procurement: goals and conditions 11 Bidders dont have to describe all the specific solutions of the bid leads to a cheaper process Important for bidders to understand the question or needs of the Employer / Contracting Authority leads to more discussion about value instead of costs We look for opportunities, not only for risks again, focus on added value We ask for realisation of functions, not technicalities gives room for innovation, optimisation and more quality of product and process Best Value Procurement: procedure 12 Basics of BVP 13 Selection Clarification Pre- award Project exec. Simple requirements Non technical (no criminals) First technical review Risk assessment Value added Budget matching Detailed technical review Basic Engineering Contract Sum Risk management Quality Control (ISO9001) Contract management Which products? 14 Selection Clarification Pre- award Project exec. By references based on similar activities instead of project-look-a -likes Approach Plan Interviews Conceptual design Opportunity / risk file High level cost break down (max price) Finalizing and signing the contract Project delivery Milestones First BVP projects (2008-2012) 15 Selection Clarification Pre- award Project exec. approx. 5-25 bidders 3 1 5 Signing contract Best Practice (2013-now) 16 Selection Clarification Pre- award Project exec. 3 1 Signing contract approx. 5-25 bidders Time schedule 17 Selection Clarification Pre- award Project exec. 3 1 4 weeks 8-10 weeks 12-20 weeks Signing contract RFT approx. 5-25 bidders Bid consist of: Interviews Risk plan Project Capability Plan Value Added Plan (conceptual design) And Milestone (for contractmanagement purposes) Cost / Financial proposal (for contractmanagement purposes) Products in procedure 18 National level: Ministry of Infrastructure BVP used in tendering of 31 contracts total value of 580.000.000 euro 15 projects completed and delivered satisfactory 2014-2015: 20 more projects in pipeline Local departments / agencies BVP used in 100+ projects (est.) BVP aspects are incorporated in normal MEAT tenders Experiences in NL 19 Best Value Procurement works very good within EU laws (both old 2004/18 and 2004/17 Directives and the new ones which should be implemented in Q1 2016) Tenderers keep interest of Client in mind during tender nd project excecution Tenderers (and Employer) have siginificantly lower transaction costs Tender takes less time than classical procedures Goals accomplished 20 more value for taxpayers money a faster process to both sides a cheaper process for Engineers and Contractors more focus on chances and values of CA a foundation of continuing cooperation after signing the contract between CA, Engineers, Consultants and Contractors What BVP has to offer 21 Training and practice and Training and practice and Training and practice and Effort on understanding - from both sides of the table Work on communication skills of people involved A functional view of the project What BVP requires. 22 Preparation is key: prepare a BVP procedure thoroughly Create a centre point of knowledge (eg. a national institute) Do objective evaluations of the first BVP tender procedures with all parties (client, consultants, contractors) Agree with each other to accept mistakes dont kill the innovation from the start Make transparency matter: fair play Share your experiences, and learn from mistakes (preferably the ones others make) Lessons: Keys to success 23 Best Value Procurement a new and simple way to procure the best? Warszawa, May 23 th 2014 24 j.merema@pro6managers.nl +31 6 10 65 04 79 LinkedIn Thank you!