Professional Documents
Culture Documents
), but it is about 25
away from
the chlorophenyl ring for the 3-Cl-BP and 4-Cl-BP triplets. The
2-chloro substituent also makes the charge distribution on the
triplets different from the others as shown in Table S7, especially
the charge on the chlorine atom. In the U-2-Cl-BP triplet congu-
ration, the chlorine atom bears a positive charge while chlorine
has a negative charge in the 3-Cl-BP and 4-Cl-BP triplets as
expected. All of these could result in the reactivity reduction of
the hydrogen abstraction reaction for the 2-Cl-BP triplet.
2-Chloro substituent reduction of the hydrogen abstraction
ability of the substituted BP triplet
The TR
3
results obtained after 266 nm photolysis of 2-Cl-BP in
IPA with a 319.9 nm probe wavelength clearly showed that the
2-Cl-DPK radical forms slower than the parent and other
chloro-substituted DPK radicals, which demonstrates that the
Figure 6. Comparison the experimental resonance Raman spectrum of
2-Cl-BP obtained in neat MeCN (B) to the DFT calculation predicted
normal Raman spectrum for the D-2-Cl-BP triplet (A) and U-2-Cl-BP triplet
(C) species. The asterisk (*) marks solvent subtraction artifacts and the #
band is due to stray laser line. Dotted lines display the correlation
between the experimental and calculated Raman bands.
Inuence of the chloro substituent position on triplet reactivity of benzophenone derivatives
J. Raman Spectrosc. (2011) Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jrs
2-chloro substituent reduces the hydrogen abstraction ability of
the 2-Cl-BP triplet. In general, carbonyl compounds having a pp*
triplet as the lowest excited state exhibit no or low photoreduction
efciency, such as some electron-donating group substituted BP
derivatives.
[1417]
In addition, the solvent polarity can affect the
hydrogen abstraction ability of the carbonyl compound triplet.
For example, if the lowest excited np* triplet is too close to the
pp* triplet state, the polar solvent can invert these two states or
promote the contribution to the unreactive pp* state. However,
the 2-Cl-BP triplet observed here still has an np* character in both
nonpolar and polar solvents, as presented in Fig. S8, which provides
the TA spectra of 2-Cl-BP triplet in cyclohexane, MeCN and MeCN:
H
2
O/1:1 mixed solvents. The TA spectra for the 2-Cl-BP triplet
obtained in these three solvents are almost identical and indicate
that the solvent polarity does not substantially change the lowest
triplet property and the contributions on the np* and pp* states.
The geometry comparison has revealed that the chloro-
substitution at the ortho- position has a large inuence on the
substituted BP triplet geometries. In addition, the 2-chloro
substituent also strongly changes the electron density of the
lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) for the 2-Cl-BP
triplets as illustrated in Fig. 7, which can provide some insight
into how the 2-chloro substituent reduces the hydrogen
abstraction ability of the 2-Cl-BP triplet. Figure 7 shows that
for 2-Cl-BP the LUMO orbit delocalizes the chlorine atom and
carbonyl. The chlorine atom at the 2-position leads to signicant
interaction with the nearby carbonyl so that it appears like a
pipi interaction that is not present in the 3- and 4- chlorine
substituted BP derivatives. This clearly suggests the chemical re-
activity of the 2-position substituted chloro BP species will be
signicantly different from the 3-Cl-BP and 4-Cl-BP triplets,
which is consistent with the observed experimental results de-
scribed earlier.
Conclusion
A ns-TR
3
spectroscopic investigation of the reactivity of the Cl-BP
triplets has been described. The 3-Cl-BP, 4-Cl-BP and 4,
4-dichloro-BP triplets exhibit similar hydrogen abstraction ability
as has been found previously for the parent BP triplet. In IPA, the
3-Cl-DPK, 4-Cl-DPK and 4,4-dichloro-DPK radicals were observed
and react with DMK radical most likely at the para-position to
form a para-LAT. In a MeCN:H
2
O/1:1 aqueous solvent, these
DPK radicals were also observed but with a slower formation rate.
However, a smaller yield and a slower rate of formation of the
2-Cl-DPK radical were observed compared with the other
chloro-substituted BP derivatives that were investigated here in
IPA. All of these results indicate that the 2-chloro substituent
reduces the hydrogen abstraction ability of the substituted BP
triplet, not as may be expected that an electron-withdrawing
group could increase its photoreduction activity. DFT calculation
results suggest that the chloro-substituent at the ortho position
changes the BP triplet geometry and makes the carbonyl oxygen
less electrophilic from its interaction with the carbonyl moiety.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants from the Research Grants
Council of Hong Kong (HKU 7035/08P) and the University Grants
Committee Special Equipment Grant (SEG-HKU-07) to DLP.
Supporting Information
Supporting information may be found in the online version of
this article.
References
[1] W. Moore, G. Hammond, R. Foss, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 2789.
[2] R. Hochstrasser, J. Wessel, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1973, 19, 156.
[3] R. Hochstrasser, H. Lutz, G. Scott, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974, 24, 162.
[4] M. Topp, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1975, 32, 144.
[5] R. V. Bensasson, J. C. Gramain, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1980,
76, 1801.
[6] H. Miyasaka, N. Mataga, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 131.
[7] X. Cai, M. Sakamoto, M. Fujitsuka, T. Majima, Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11,
6471.
[8] J. Chilton, L. Giering, C. Steel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 1865.
[9] A. Demeter, T. Berces, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem 1989, 46, 27.
[10] T. Tahara, H. Hamaguchi, M. Tasumi, J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 5875.
[11] G. Porter, P. Suppan, Trans. Faraday Soc. 1966, 62, 3375.
[12] G. Porter, P. Suppan, Trans. Faraday Soc. 1965, 61, 1664.
[13] A. Beckett, G. Porter, Trans. Faraday Soc. 1963, 59, 2038.
[14] A. C. Bhasikuttan, A. K. Singh, D. K. Palit, J. P. Mittal, J. Phys. Chem. A
1998, 102, 3470.
[15] A. K. Singh, D. K. Palit, J. P. Mittal, J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 7002.
[16] P. Aspari, N. Ghoneim, E. Haselbach, M. Von Raumer, P. Suppan,
E. Vauthey, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1996, 92, 1689.
[17] N. Ghoeneim, A. Monbelli, D. Pilloud, P. Suppan, J. Photochem.
Photobiol. A: Chem. 1996, 94, 145.
[18] D. I. Scuster, M. D. Goldstein, P. Bane, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 99, 187.
[19] L. C. T. Shoute, J. P. Mittal, J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 8630.
[20] R. Anandhi, S. Umapathy, J. Raman Spectrosc. 2000, 31, 331.
[21] A. Gilbert, J. Baggott, P. J. Wagner, Essentials of Molecular Photochem-
sitry, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 2000, pp. 307
[22] M. El-Sayed, J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 38, 2834.
[23] B. Shah, D. Neckers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1830.
[24] J. Scaiano, J. Photochem. 1973/74, 2, 81.
[25] N. Turro, Modern molecular photochemistry, Univ. Science Books,
Sausalito, Ca 1991.
[26] L. C. T. Shoute, R. E. Huie, J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 3467.
[27] M. Sakamoto, X. Cai, M. Fujitsuka, T. Majima, J. Phys. Chem. A 2006,
110, 11800.
[28] A. C. Bhasikuttan, A. K. Singh, D. K. Palit, A. V. Sapre, J. P. Mittal,
J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 4703.
Figure 7. Simple schematic diagrams depicting the electron density for the LUMO of the Cl-BP triplets predicted from the DFT calculations. The green
atom in the geometry represents chlorine.
W. Li et al.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jrs Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Raman Spectrosc. (2011)
[29] M. Sakamoto, X. Cai, M. Hara, S. Tojo, M. Fujitsuka, T. Majima, J. Phys.
Chem. A 2004, 108, 8147.
[30] A. Demeter, T. Berces, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1989, 46, 27.
[31] B. K. Shah, M. A. J. Rodgers, D. C. Neckers, J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 6087.
[32] Y. Du, J. Xue, M. D. Li, X. Guan, D. W. McCamant, D. L. Phillips, Chem.
Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6961.
[33] M. Ramseier, P. Senn, J. Wirz, J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 3305.
[34] T. Tahara, H. Hamaguchi, M. Tasumi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 152, 135.
[35] T. Tahara, H. Hamaguchi, M. Tasumi, J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 170.
[36] M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R.
Cheeseman, J. A. Montgomery Jr., T. Vreven, K. N. Kudin, J. C. Burant,
J. M. Millam, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi,
G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara,
K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda,
O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J. E. Knox, H. P. Hratchian, J. B. Cross,
V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O.
Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, P. Y. Ayala,
K. Morokuma, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, V. G.
Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, D. K.
Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, Q.
Cui, A. G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A.
Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith,
M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P. M.
W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, J. A. Pople,
Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004.
[37] Y. Du, C. Ma, W. M. Kwok, J. Xue, D. L. Phillips, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
7148.
[38] S. P. Webb, S. W. Yeh, L. A. Phillips, M. A. Tolbert, J. H. Clark, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7286.
[39] S. P. Webb, S. W. Yeh, L. A. Phillips, M. A. Tolbert, J. H. Clark, J. Phys.
Chem. 1986, 90, 5154.
[40] B. J. Schwartz, L. A. Peteanu, C. B. Harris, J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 3591.
[41] M. B. Ledger, G. Porter, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1972, 68, 539.
[42] D. J. Lougnot, P. Jacques, J. P. Fouassier, J. Photochem. 1982, 19, 59.
[43] D. J. Lougnot, P. Jacques, J. P. Fouassier, H. L. Casal, N. Kim-Thuan,
J. C. Scaiano, Can. J. Chem. 1985, 63, 3001.
[44] M. Mizuno, T. Tahara, J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8823.
[45] Y. Du, J. Xue, C. Ma, W. M. Kwok, D. L. Phillips, J. Raman. Spectrosc.
2008, 39, 1518.
[46] Y. Du, J. Xue, C. Ma, W. M. Kwok, D. L. Phillips, J. Raman. Spectrosc.
2008, 39, 503.
[47] P. Y. Chan, W. M. Kwok, S. K. Lam, P. Chiu, D. L. Phillips, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 8246.
[48] P. Zhu, S. Y. Ong, P. Y. Chan, K. H. Leung, D. L. Phillips, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 2645.
[49] Y. L. Li, K. H. Leung, D. L. Phillips, J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 10621.
[50] J. N. Pitts Jr., R. L. Letsinger, R. P. Taylor, J. M. Patterson, G. Recktenwald,
R. B. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 1068.
[51] M. B. Rubin, Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 4615.
[52] J. C. Fister, J. M. Harris, Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 701.
Inuence of the chloro substituent position on triplet reactivity of benzophenone derivatives
J. Raman Spectrosc. (2011) Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jrs