Professional Documents
Culture Documents
x
2
+ y
2
from the plane to R
n
x
2
1
+ ... + x
2
n
. Or tensor calculus as a generalisation of vector
calculus. All these are generalizations of a pattern. In this case one can carry the pattern
further into abstractions such as metric spaces or groups. See Tall ([69], p. 11) for the
distinction between generalization (easy extension of a pattern) and abstraction (hard
reconstruction of a pattern).
4. Mason ([53], p15) discusses a tactic that encourages students to develop and express
generalities.
Exercise
Identify useful patterns in your own teaching that may illustrate important points in your lecture.
Help students to build up connections by providing roadmaps and overviews of dif-
cult sequences of arguments - try to express proofs sensibly, as much as logically
This is related to the previous item about patterns, but particularly relevant with a long proof. You can
write down a summary of the steps to begin with, or provide a handout. Try to make each step sensible
(not necessarily the same as logical) - why would you do that, why did the originator do that? Sometimes
the standard proof is presented in a sanitized, perfect, logically most efcient way that often prompts the
question Why?! from any curious student. Sometimes it may be best to use a different form of the proof
that does make each step fairly obvious. And the classic rabbit out of a hat trick of pure mathematics
where a form of expression is selected, or a particular condition is stipulated, can be exposed for what it
often is - a device to make the proof work.
Examples
1. The proof of a major theorem such as Cauchys theorem cries out for some sort of road-
map linking all the steps and showing how they build up into the nal picture. You
can treat it as a group exercise within the lecture, only going through it for the students
yourself when they have had a good try. Here the basic idea is to build up the proof by
rst deriving it for triangles, using a reduction process on smaller and smaller triangles
to provide estimations for the integrals required. This can then be used to derive the
anti-derivative theorem and hence Cauchys theorem.
2. A similar example is the proof of Lagranges theorem in Group Theory. In this case the
structure is one of continual searching for cosets by a repetitive process until the group is
exhausted. The connections and structure of the proof can be lost in the technical details
if attention is not drawn to it.
101
3. Mason ([53], p. 54) advocates using tree diagrams to illustrate the structure of a proof
and to bring together the various ideas and steps.
Exercise
Choose a few of your lectures and study the major ideas in each of them. Can the complexities of
these be illustrated by appropriate roadmaps and overviews? Devise exercises that might help the
students to construct these themselves.
Alert students to the fact that some teaching and learning is provisional, and may
have to be revised at a later date
As higher levels of mathematics are reached it becomes increasingly necessary to compromise between
exactitude and economy of explanation. Due to time or other limitations we sometimes have to be a little
economical with the truth in the interests of progress through the material. We perhaps avoid a subtlety
that the students will revisit in a later course. On such occasions at least warn them, as a matter of intel-
lectual honesty, that that is what you are doing, and that you cannot at the moment give them the whole
picture. The students dont have to believe that everything they learn is the absolute last word - indeed,
informed scepticism is an essential asset for any educated person. The rst two examples below are cases
where at some stage in a childs mathematical education they are taught rmly established facts usually
without qualication, which are later overturned to reveal whole new realms of mathematics. Rules in
mathematics are made to be broken! John Bell - All no-go theorems show is a lack of imagination.
Examples
1. Students do not always realise for themselves that such things as Pythagoras, 180 degrees
in a triangle, etc are restricted to plane geometry and do not for example hold in general
on a sphere. But then, when alerted to this fact, they may protest that one would not
hesitate to calculate the diagonal of a eld using Pythagoras, despite the fact that it is
on a spherical earth. This is an example where their previous teachers have had to be
incomplete in their explanation to avoid muddying the waters. Point out that this will
often happen, because we are continually adapting to newcircumstances in mathematics.
We cannot at every stage go into all the detailed restrictions on our statements.
2. Ditto for the oft-quoted assertion in early school mathematics that we cant take the
square root of a negative number.
3. Tall [69] makes the point that we teach students a great deal about solving differential
equations analytically, and this might give them the impression that most equations can
be solved in this way. Of course, the number of differential equations that can be solved
analytically is negligible and they are the exception - thats why we need numerical meth-
ods. We can explain this to the students and perhaps show them a few differential equa-
tions that cant be solved in analytical form.
Exercise
When are you being economical with the truth in your lectures - do you need to give any health
warnings? You often feel this when you make some statement and then immediately think to
yourself Ah, but, ... At this point it is probably best to be open with the students and add a qualier
There are occasions when this breaks down, but these cases dont concern us here.
102
We have deliberately gone into great detail in this subsection on explanation, because it is so fundamental
to teaching. Good skills in explanation will not only help the students, but also save you time by enabling
you to progress more rapidly and reduce the likelihood of students coming to you for clarication.
3.11 Evaluating and Developing the Lecture
Even the most experienced lecturer sometimes nds something to improve in a lecture they may have
given a number of times. Certainly, in your rst years of teaching, every lecture is actually a learning
experience as much for you as for the students, and so each one needs to be evaluated so that you can
develop it further and improve your teaching. The Higher Education Academy UK Professional Stan-
dards Framework (http://www.heacademy.ac.uk) holds as one of its professional values a willingness
on the part of practitioners to regularly evaluate and develop their performance and teaching practice.
Your institution may have mechanisms for this as its own quality assurance and enhancement policies.
So it is likely that you will have some sort of formal evaluation of your lecturing in your rst few years of
teaching at least. This is NOT the subject of this section, although its results may of course feed into your
development. Such formal arrangements will usually follow some specied protocol that will normally
be explained to you through your institutional staff development unit. What we are referring to here is
the continual day to day process of learning and self-improvement that most academics take as a matter
of course.
In fact this area is important, because it is how we measure the effectiveness of the impact of any training
we receive. Baumslag ([7]) gives a delightful and memorable analogy to illustrate this - the difference
between a good and an indifferent carpenter. The good carpenter sharpens his tools before putting them
away after nishing a job. So the good lecturer, on leaving a lecture, spends a few minutes jotting (or
tapping!) down the main topics of the lecture, good and bad points, ideas for doing things differently
next time. This takes a little time, but is invaluable. You may put off doing this, because you think the
things are so clear that you will remember them - but you probably wont. Occasionally give the students
a very quick feedback form to see how things are going. By now you will be getting a fairly good idea
of what makes for a good lecture in theoretical terms, so construct for yourself a checklist of the sort of
things you might want to think about after the lecture.
Wankat and Oreovicz [72, p 321] recommend setting minute papers at the end of a lecture, containing
such questions as What is the most important thing you learned today? or What questions do you still
have.
And, of course there is the minute by minute micro-evaluation we do throughout the lecture, in which
we watch the students to get a feel for how the class is going. It helps if you can cultivate a couple of the
students who you can rely upon to give you feedback on progress. If students make comments, good or
bad, dont take it personally. During the lecture is by far the easiest time for a student to sort out problems
and misconceptions, and almost certainly other students will benet from the issues addressed. This is
one reason why you should identify in advance the difcult areas where you know most students will
have a problem, then you can address them there and then.
Exercise
Design a short checklist for use in evaluating how a lecture has gone, including questions for the
students and for yourself.