Professional Documents
Culture Documents
+ A
=
Where
AS = Opening Sulphur Final Sulphur
Mg % = Residual Mg content
Mg Rec. = Recovery of Magnesium, for all practical
For example:
Calculating quantity of cored wire to be injected
and cost of treatment as practiced at one of the
renowned SG iron foundry in India is as follows:
The existing parameters are:
Treatment Parameters Quantity /Units
Quantity of Metal treated : 1000 kgs
S (i) (Initial Sulphur) : 0.02%
S(f) (Final Sulphur) : 0.007%
AS (S (i) -S(f) ) : 0.013%
Mg (f) : 0.04
Cored Wire : Mg 20 with 20% Mg
Wire Density : 120 +/-10 gms/Mtr
Treatment : 1400 1450C
With practical consideration it is found that Mg
recovery is more than 45%.
) 1000 (
24 45
04 . 0 ) 013 . 0 76 . 0 (
) 1000 ( ) (
+
= mt Length Wire
Length of Wire (mtr) = 46 mtr (i.e. 5.5 Kgs of Powder)
Cost of Treatment /MT of LM = 5.5 kgs x Rs.180/-
= Rs.990/- /MT of LM
Although the cost comparison with other process as
sandwich or other, is very difficult, because type/
grades of alloy, cost of alloy are used and recovery
of Mg etc. Suppose using FeSiMg 7% Mg alloy is
used to treat above metal and the Mg recovery is
45-50% the alloy consumed can be calculated using
the following empirical formula, for all parameters
given above as change in sulphur AS, final Mg in
melt Mgf
R
t S
Mg
Mg
W W
FeSiMg
f
ladle FeSiMg
+ A +
=
%
3
10 %) ( 76 . 0
= 1000 x (0.04 + 0.76(0.013)) / (7x 0.45)
= 15.8 Kgs
If assumed price of FeSiMg of Mg 7% is more than
Rs. 90/-. Thus the price of treatment will be
15.8 x 90 = Rs. 1422 /- . Thus the Mg treatment of
iron with cored wire injection is cheaper than
sandwich process.
This is one of the examples, but the cost of
treatment varies from foundry to foundry because
it depends on various parameters. Cost of one
foundry cannot be applied to another foundry, it
has to be well experimented.
Advantages
Various advantages of cored wire injection process
are summarized below according to above
discussion.
Improved Metallurgical results achieved by
precise addition of Mg Cored Wire resulting
in close control of the residual Mg in the iron.
Very flexible with any composition of iron,
especially with Sulphur which is very
difficult to treat with other process
Lower loss than alloy process.
Better efficiency.
Reliable and consistent process.
Ease of operations.
Less slag formation and ladle buildup
Less slag inclusions in the castings.
Favorable cost of treatment.
Desulphurization and Spheroidization can be
done simultaneously.
Reduced labor requirements.
Less capital investment and treatment cost.
Harmless to the environment as emission
can be controlled and drawn off easily.
Process supports futuristic alloy like CG Iron
production.
Scope for Total Automation
Fig. 3: The effect of different wire feeding speed
(a) Too High Speed (b) Too low speed (c) Normal speed
a) b) c)