In this new century, a museum is no
longer a place for simply collecting,
conserving and exhibiting artifacts. It is
becoming an inseparable part of urban life.
How should the museum fulfill this new
role in the era of supertechnologies? How
should a traditional establishment turn
this challenge to their advantage? These
issues were discussed in the autumn of
2012 at an international conference in Tbilisi
entitled "Why Museums Now? Keeping
the Past – Facing the Future" by specialists,
managers and architects from the British
Museum (London), the Smithsonian Institution
(Washington D.C.), Prussian Cultural
Heritage Foundation / The State Museums
of Berlin, the Metropolitan Museum (New
York), UNESCO and the Georgian National
Museum. Importantly, the last day of
the conference was devoted to the South
Caucasus and post-Soviet countries. Armenian,
Azeri, Belorussian, Kazakh, Russian,
Ukrainian, Uzbek and Georgian experts
participated in a regional workshop entitled
"Museums of Eastern Europe, Central
Asia and the Caucasus in the 21st Century".
After the international conference, its
participants said that the Georgian National
Museum could become an example of
development and progress in the region,
thanks to its innovative projects.
In this new century, a museum is no
longer a place for simply collecting,
conserving and exhibiting artifacts. It is
becoming an inseparable part of urban life.
How should the museum fulfill this new
role in the era of supertechnologies? How
should a traditional establishment turn
this challenge to their advantage? These
issues were discussed in the autumn of
2012 at an international conference in Tbilisi
entitled "Why Museums Now? Keeping
the Past – Facing the Future" by specialists,
managers and architects from the British
Museum (London), the Smithsonian Institution
(Washington D.C.), Prussian Cultural
Heritage Foundation / The State Museums
of Berlin, the Metropolitan Museum (New
York), UNESCO and the Georgian National
Museum. Importantly, the last day of
the conference was devoted to the South
Caucasus and post-Soviet countries. Armenian,
Azeri, Belorussian, Kazakh, Russian,
Ukrainian, Uzbek and Georgian experts
participated in a regional workshop entitled
"Museums of Eastern Europe, Central
Asia and the Caucasus in the 21st Century".
After the international conference, its
participants said that the Georgian National
Museum could become an example of
development and progress in the region,
thanks to its innovative projects.
In this new century, a museum is no
longer a place for simply collecting,
conserving and exhibiting artifacts. It is
becoming an inseparable part of urban life.
How should the museum fulfill this new
role in the era of supertechnologies? How
should a traditional establishment turn
this challenge to their advantage? These
issues were discussed in the autumn of
2012 at an international conference in Tbilisi
entitled "Why Museums Now? Keeping
the Past – Facing the Future" by specialists,
managers and architects from the British
Museum (London), the Smithsonian Institution
(Washington D.C.), Prussian Cultural
Heritage Foundation / The State Museums
of Berlin, the Metropolitan Museum (New
York), UNESCO and the Georgian National
Museum. Importantly, the last day of
the conference was devoted to the South
Caucasus and post-Soviet countries. Armenian,
Azeri, Belorussian, Kazakh, Russian,
Ukrainian, Uzbek and Georgian experts
participated in a regional workshop entitled
"Museums of Eastern Europe, Central
Asia and the Caucasus in the 21st Century".
After the international conference, its
participants said that the Georgian National
Museum could become an example of
development and progress in the region,
thanks to its innovative projects.
longer a place for simply collecting, conserving and exhibiting artifacts. It is becominganinseparablepart of urbanlife. Howshould the museumfulfill this new role in the era of supertechnologies? How should a traditional establishment turn this challenge to their advantage? These issues were discussed in the autumn of 2012 at an international conference inTbi- lisi entitled "Why Museums Now? Keeping the Past Facing the Future" by specialists, managers and architects from the British Museum (London), the Smithsonian Insti- tution (Washington D.C.), Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation / The State Museums of Berlin, the Metropolitan Museum (New York), UNESCO and the Georgian Natio- nal Museum. Importantly, the last day of the conference was devoted to the South Caucasus andpost-Soviet countries. Arme- nian, Azeri, Belorussian, Kazakh, Russian, Ukrainian, Uzbek and Georgian experts participated in a regional workshop enti- tled "Museums of Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Caucasus in the 21 st Century". After the international conference, its participants said that the Georgian Natio- nal Museumcould become an example of development and progress in the region, thanks to its innovative projects. AMUSEUMDISTRICT A thematic exhibition was held within the framework of the conference. The exhibition, which opened at the Simon Ja- nashia Museumof Georgia in cooperation with the Goethe Institute of Georgia and The State Museums of Berlin, presented a museum-centered concept for both Tbili- si and Berlin. In the case of Berlin there is an existing concept of a Museum Island, while in Tbilisi a project will turn the mu- seum section of Rustaveli Avenue into a completely new urban space. French ar- chitect Jean Franois Milou is the author of the project. His plan was presented at the exhibition along with sketches of Gu- diashvili Street madeby Georgianarchitect Vladimer Kurtishvili in the 1970s. What is the idea behind Berlins Museum Island? What role does it play in the city's overall urban scene, what does it add to it, how does it make it more vibrant? How does such a systemof museums deal with the issue of protecting and exhibiting col- lections? These were questions raised by the exhibition that opened at the Museum, and answered by graphic presentations andphotos, items andaccompanyingtexts, as well as a filmfor exhibition visitors. These two projects exhibited side by side one implemented and one planned allowed visitors to clearly grasp the scale of chan- ges that a project suchasMuseumDistrict wouldentail. Based on Berlins Museum Island exam- ple we can assume that Museum District Tbilisi will soon become a model for pla- cing and protecting collections in optimal spaces, and for the effective allocation of expositionspace. This will bea process that will extend beyond museum walls and, through the joint efforts of politicians and representatives of business and academia will transformthecapital's center intoadis- trict of art and knowledge. The project covers an area that includes the National Gallery, Alexander's Garden, Gudiashvili Street, Simon Janashia and Shalva Amiranashvili Museums and ad- jacent territories. The transformation has already begun at the Simon Janashia Mu- seum, where a ticket-free zone has been opened with a cafe and a gift shop, with a courtyard that hosts interesting events. Once the museum street is fully operatio- nal it will beoneof thecentral components unifying Rustaveli Avenue and Gudiashvili Street. NEWSTANDARDS ATTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM The Twinning Project is an EU-funded program of cooperation that helps pu- blic institutions in East European coun- tries harmonize their standards with those of the EU through trainings, semi- nars, consultations, reorganization and legislative changes. It entails the part- nership between public institutions of a EU member state and a country aspiring to become an EU member, to promote reforms and further development. Twinning projects have been success- fully implemented in various countries for more than 10 years, and the agreement on cooperation with the Georgian National Museum was signed five years ago. The goal was to provide the Museumwith ins- titutional support, and was the first Twin- KEEPING THE PAST FACING THE FUTURE PROJECT > Tamar Babuadze The Twinning Project is an EU-funded program of cooperation that helps public institutions in East European countries harmonize their standards with those of the EU through trainings, seminars, consultations, reorganization and legislative changes. It entails the partnership between public institutions of a EU member state and a country aspiring to become an EU member, to promote reforms and further development. GEORGIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM 25 24 ning project in the cultural sphere, with The State Museums of Berlin as the Natio- nal Museum's partner. Leading experts of The State Museums of Berlin from40 diffe- rent sectors shared their experience in re- organizingamuseuminatransitionperiod withthe Georgiancolleagues inthe course of the 27-month project. Priority spheres included the building planning, storage and workshop space, moving the collec- tions, restoration and conservation of ar- tifacts, museum management and the in- troduction of general museumstandards. The Twinning project consisted of four components. The first envisaged the crea- tion of storage space for works of art, the second created recommendations to im- prove preventive conservation, the third was a test project for moving the collec- tions implemented with the Oriental Art Collectionandthefourthcomponent en- tailed the preparation of a set of museum standards. Eventually, this document defi- ned the Museum's internal standards with regard to public relations, partnerships and legal issues concerning exhibitions and loaning exhibit items. STORAGE SPACE FORWORKS OF ART Oneof thepriority issues intheGeorgian National Museum's reorganization plan was to add one more component to the Twinning project the creation of storage space for works of art. This will be a system of restorationandconservation, diagnostic laboratories and collection storage spaces equipped with modern technologies whe- re all types of items kept in the museum can be brought for restoration, conserva- tion and research. The idea is that the cen- ter will also help the museums of neigh- boring countries in scientific research and restoration, as its purpose andcapacity will be of an unprecedented scale in the South Caucasus. The author of the concept of the stora- ge facility for the works of art, Jean Fran- ois Milou, elaborated the initial draft and main aspects of the concept after consul- tations with the head of the Georgian Na- tional Museum and its leading specialists. The project itself was prepared within the framework of the Twinning Project by the National Museum's Architecture andCons- truction Office group with the help of lea- ding specialists from The State Museums of Berlin. The German colleagues consul- ted the Georgian specialists on each issue including the structural analysis, construc- tionplanningandarchitecture, equipment of storage facilities, restoration workshops and research labs. The second function of the center is the storage of collections from the Shalva Ami- ranashvili Museum of Fine Arts, the Simon JanashiaMuseumof GeorgiaandtheDimitri Shevardnadze National Gallery. According to the preliminary plan, a large space will be allocated in the newbuilding for the collec- tions and equipped with modern technolo- gyfor theprotectionof museumitems. On Gudiashvili Street, a new building will be constructed next to the Museumof Fine Arts and will contain storage and res- torationfacilities for art includingpaintings and graphic arts, paper, glass, textile, cera- mic, metal and wood. The issue of storingthe collections inthe new center is addressed in the Twinning Project as well. All items at the National Museum have been digitized, and accor- ding to each item's size, weight, condition and photo have been entered into a data- base. The floor space of storage facilities for the works of art and laboratories were planned after these data were analyzed. The two components of modern standar- ds andequipment became the basis of the entireconcept of thecenter. Thanks tonew technologies not only restorationandcon- servation can be conducted but it will also be possible to carry out a comprehensive scientific study on any item. THE ORIENTAL ART COLLECTION "New Life for the Oriental Art Collec- tion" is one of the most diverse and rich exhibitions of the Simon Janashia Mu- seum of Georgia. An Egyptian mummy and a sarcophagus; an 8 th -century page from the Quran written on parchment; an easel, a miniature and lacquer pain- tings from China and Japan; Chinese silk paintings and compositions on rice pa- per; metal and ceramic tableware; Chine- se vases from the 14 th to 19 th centuries; and combat weapons made of precious metals are only a part of 180 masterpie- ces from the cultures of Egypt, the Isla- mic world and the Far East now on dis- play, making a lasting impression on the visitors. The exhibition is particularly impor- tant because many items displayed have been restored. Due to unsuitable con- ditions at the Shalva Amiranashvili Mu- seum of Fine Arts, many items had sus- tained damage, making them unfit to be exhibited. Unique items had to be res- cued. Restoring and recording-digitizing the Oriental Art Collection and moving it to new quarters was a main component of the Twinning Project. It was also an experiment since it entailed the creation of instructions for moving works of art into new storage facilities and for con- serving them in the National Museum. This important component of the Twin- ning Project had twofold results: extre- mely rare items from the Oriental Art Collection were treated and restored, while a new set of rules and instructions were elaborated. This will mean that pre- cious items in the Museum will be pro- tected by more qualified and systematic processes. GEORGIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM 27 GEORGIAN NATIONAL MUSEUM 26