You are on page 1of 13

International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World

(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
1

ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES (ESP)
FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF IRANIAN ESP TEACHERS

Amir Hamid Forough Ameri (M.A.)
Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran
Address: Soosan 14, Rezvan 24, Algadir Township, Islamic Republic Boulevard, Kerman, Iran
Phone Number: (098)-0341-2820494, 09133985547
E-mail: ahfameri@gmail.com


ABSTRACT
This study aimed to investigate English for specific purposes (ESP) teachers attitudes toward
ESP courses. Specifically, the purpose of this study was to explore ESP teachers agreement
with the ESP courses and their attitudes as to what ESP course objectives should be and whether
those objectives are supported by ESP materials. Moreover, ESP teachers views about their
approaches toward assessing ESP students learning as well as ESP teachers evaluation of both
the materials and the ESP course were the focus of this study. The participants were 15 ESP
teachers. They were asked six questions each of which was related to one of the objectives of this
study. The analysis of the data revealed that first, most teachers consider ESP courses useful;
second, the main objectives of ESP courses should be the translation of specialized texts and then
reading comprehension of specialized texts which, in their opinion, have also been supported by
the materials; third, ESP teachers reported they conducted a process-oriented approach; fourth,
almost half of the teachers considered the materials useful, and finally, the majority of the ESP
teachers evaluated the ESP courses to be useful.


KEY WORDS: English for specific purposes (ESP), ESP objectives, ESP students, ESP teachers


INTRODUCTION
What is ESP?
Farhady (2005, p.7) stated that we do not find any theory in the literature formulated
exclusively for ESP, and emphasized that ESP has been more under the control of
practitioners than theoreticians. According to Fiorito, (2002) English for Specific Purposes
(ESP) is different from English as a Second Language (ESL). The most important difference lies
in the learners and their purposes for learning English. ESP students are usually adults who
already have some acquaintance with English and are learning the language in order to
communicate a set of professional skills and to perform particular job-related functions. He
noted that an ESP program is built on an evaluation of purposes and needs for which English is
required.

Moreover, Fiorito (2002) added that ESL and ESP are different not only in the nature of the
learner, but also in the aim of instruction (p. 1). In fact, as a general rule, while in ESL all four
language skills; listening, reading, speaking, and writing are stressed equally, in ESP it is a needs
International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
2

analysis that determines which language skills are most needed by the students, and the syllabus
is designed accordingly.

From the early 1960's, ESP has grown to become one of the most prominent areas of EFL
teaching today. According to Anthony (2007), ESP has had a relatively long time to mature and
so we would expect the ESP community to have a clear idea about what ESP means. Strangely,
however, this does not seem to be the case. In 1998, Dudley-Evans and ST John gave an
extended definition of ESP in terms of 'absolute' and 'variable' characteristics:

Absolute Characteristics
1. ESP is defined to meet specific needs of the learners
2. ESP makes use of underlying methodology and activities of the discipline it serves
3. ESP is centered on the language appropriate to these activities in terms of grammar, lexis
register, study skills, discourse and genre.
Variable Characteristics
1. ESP may be related to or designed for specific disciplines
2. ESP may use, in specific teaching situations, a different methodology from that of General
English
3. ESP is likely to be designed for adult learners, either at a tertiary level institution or in a
professional work situation. It could, however, be for learners at secondary school level
4. ESP is generally designed for intermediate or advanced students.
5. Most ESP courses assume some basic knowledge of the language systems

Robinson (1991) has also defined ESP, accepting the primacy of needs analysis in her definition.
Her definition is based on two key defining criteria and a number of characteristics. The key
criteria are that ESP is normally goal-directed, and that ESP courses develop from a needs
analysis, which aims to specify as closely as possible what exactly it is that students have to
do through the medium of English (Robinson, 1991, p. 3). The characteristics of definition are
that ESP courses are generally restricted by a limited time period, and are taught to adults
in homogeneous classes.

The origins of ESP
Certainly, a great deal about the origins of ESP could be written. Notably, there are three reasons
common to the emergence of all ESP: the demands of a Brave New World, a revolution in
linguistics, and focus on the learner (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987).

They (1987) noted that two key historical periods breathed life into ESP. First, the end of the
Second World War brought with it an " ... age of enormous and unprecedented expansion in
scientific, technical and economic activity on an international scale ! for various reasons, most
notably the economic power of the United States in the post-war world, the role [of international
language] fell to English" (p. 6). Second, the Oil Crisis of the early 1970s resulted in Western
money and knowledge flowing into the oil-rich countries. The language of this knowledge
became English.
International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
3

The general effect of all this development was to exert pressure on the language teaching
profession to deliver the required goods. Whereas English had previously decided its own
destiny, it now became subject to the wishes, needs and demands of people other than language
teachers (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987).

The second key reason cited as having a great effect on the emergence of ESP was a revolution in
linguistics. Whereas traditional linguists set out to describe the features of language,
revolutionary pioneers in linguistics began to focus on the ways in which language is used in real
communication. Hutchinson and Waters (1987) pointed out that one significant discovery was in
the ways that spoken and written English vary. In other words, given the particular context in
which English is used, the variant of English will change. This idea was taken one step farther. If
language in different situations varies, then tailoring language instruction to meet the needs of
learners in specific contexts is also possible. So, in the late 1960s and the early 1970s there were
many attempts to describe English for Science and Technology (EST).

The final reason Hutchinson and Waters (1987) cited as having influenced the emergence of ESP
has less to do with linguistics and everything to do with psychology. Rather than simply focus on
the method of language delivery, more attention was given to the ways in which learners acquire
language and the differences in the ways language is acquired. Learners were seen to employ
different learning strategies, use different skills, enter with different learning schemata, and be
motivated by different needs and interests. Therefore, focus on the learners' needs became
equally paramount as the methods employed to disseminate linguistic knowledge.

Characteristics of ESP courses
Carter (1983) has stated that there are three features common to ESP courses: a) authentic
material, b) purpose-related orientation, and c) self-direction. If we consider Dudley-Evans and
ST Johns (1998) claim that ESP should be offered at an intermediate or advanced level, use of
authentic learning materials is completely possible. The use of authentic content materials,
modified or unmodified in form, are indeed a feature of ESP, particularly in self-directed study
and research tasks.

As Gatehouse (2001) has claimed Purpose-related orientation refers to the simulation of
communicative tasks required of the target setting (p. 5). Finally, self-direction is characteristic
of ESP courses in that the ... point of including self-direction ... is that ESP is concerned with
turning learners into users" (Carter, 1983, p. 134). In order for self-direction to occur, the learners
must have a certain degree of freedom to decide when, what, and how they will study.

Recent world events have emphasized the need to increase understanding and to improve
communication among all citizens. To meet their communication needs, more and more
individuals have highly specific academic and professional reasons for seeking to improve their
language skills: for these students, usually adults, courses that fall under the heading English for
Special Purposes (ESP) are particularly interesting. ESP programs focus on developing
communicative competence in a specific field, such as aviation, business, or technology.

International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
4

How is ESP different from general English language courses?
Hortas (1995, p. 2) considers the following as different ways in which ESP is different from
general English language courses:

1. The words and sentences learned, the subject matter discussed, all relate to a particular field
or discipline, for example, a lawyer writing a brief, or a diplomat preparing a policy paper.
The courses make use of vocabulary and tasks related to the field such as negotiation skills
and effective techniques for oral presentations.
2. ESP programs use printed and audio-visual materials that are specially designed to meet the
needs of a specific group of learners, usually adults. Typical ESP textbooks are English for
Corporate Communications and English for Information Systems.
3. Tuition for an ESP course may be somewhat higher than that of a general English language
course. (The specialized teaching, requiring professionals, the broad range of supporting
activities and facilities explain this higher cost.), although a highly specialized course lasting
only two or three weeks might be designed to meet the needs of a specific group. Apart from
differences in ESP programs' duration and cost, these courses have a common purpose: to
increase students' skill and confidence in using English.

Moreover, ESP is known as a learner-centered approach to teaching English as a foreign or
second language. It meets the needs of (mostly) adult learners who need to learn a foreign
language for use in their specific fields, such as science, technology, medicine, leisure, and
academic learning (Yildiz, 2004).

Yildiz (2004, p. 1) has identified ESP objectives as follows:

To develop an understanding about the factors that led to the emergence of ESP and the
forces, both theoretical and applied, that have shaped its subsequent development.
To assist students develop needs assessments and genre analyses for specific groups of
learners.
To provide guidelines to adapt or create authentic ESP materials in a chosen professional
or occupational area and to critically evaluate currently available materials, including
technology-based ones.
To become knowledgeable about assessment procedures appropriate for ESP and apply
this knowledge in developing course and lesson evaluation plans in their professional or
occupational area.

In fact, as T. Nazarova (1996, as cited in Sysoyev, 2000) showed, for many years ESP instruction
was limited to training special lexicon and translating numerous texts. Of course, such methods
did not reflect students' interests and resulted in low learner motivation and poor participation.
With the spread of the student-centered approach and the continued increase of international
contacts in various spheres, much attention has been paid to the design of ESP courses that can
prepare students for professional communication.


International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
5

Formulation of goals and objectives of the course
As Sysoyev (2000) has noted formulating goals and objectives for a particular course allows the
teacher to create a clear picture of what the course is going to be about (p. 2). As Graves (1996)
explained, goals are general statements or the final destination, the level students will need to
achieve. Objectives express certain ways of achieving the goals. In other words, objectives are
teachable chunks, which in their accumulation form the essence of the course (Sysoyev, 2000,
p. 2). Clear understanding of goals and objectives will help teachers to be sure what material to
teach, and when and how it should be taught. In his book Nunan (1988) gives a clear description
of how one should state objectives. Depending on what is desired, objectives may sound like the
following:

Students will learn that ...
Students will be aware of ...
Students will develop ...

Selecting and developing ESP materials
Do ESP textbooks really exist? This is the central question Johns (1990) addressed. One of the
core dilemmas he presented was that "ESP teachers find themselves in a situation where they are
expected to produce a course that exactly matches the needs of a group of learners, but are
expected to do so with no, or very limited, preparation time" (Johns, 1990, p. 91).

In the real world, many ESL instructors/ESP developers are not provided with enough time for
needs analysis, materials research and materials development. There are many texts which claim
to meet the needs of ESP courses. Johns (1990) commented that no one ESP text can live up to its
name.

For many teachers, selection of teaching materials is based on their availability. Furthermore,
chosen materials determine the content of the course. Quite often it serves as a justification and
explanation of the use of the same syllabus with different students. In student-centered
instruction, the appropriateness of materials includes student comfort and familiarity with the
material, language level, interest, and relevance.

However, in some situations teachers are dependent on the materials and are required to use the
same textbook over and over again. Potentially there is nothing bad in using the same teaching
materials, if everything is conceptualized through a learner-centered approach. The same article
or audio story can be used for developing reading or listening comprehension skills, cultural
awareness, expanding vocabulary, etc (Sysoyev, 2000, p. 3). Thus, as Graves pointed out,
teaching materials are "tools that can be figuratively cut up into component pieces and then
rearranged to suit the needs, abilities, and interests of the students in the course (Graves, 1996,
p. 27).

Course-development as an on-going process
Developing a new course is not just planning a course. In teaching, instructors are constant
learners. With professional experience, our views, teaching concepts, and methodological
International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
6

knowledge are continuously changing. From year to year, we have different students with
different needs and background. That will inevitably make it necessary and important to modify
every course and adjust it to a particular group of students. Furthermore, quite often in the
classroom things take place in an unexpected or unplanned way. Flexible teachers are open to
making necessary changes while teaching. They can see what can or should be modified, added,
or changed to make the course reflect students' interests and needs(Sysoyev, 2000, p. 4).

Therefore, course development can be seen as an on-going process. In fact, as Johns and Price-
Machado (as cited in Celce-Murcia, 2001, p. 47) have quoted Widdowson (1981) a process
oriented approach accepts from the outset that the language data given to the learner will not be
preserved in store intact, but will be used in the mental mill.


LITERATURE REVIEW
Having reviewed the related literature, the present researcher could just find two articles which
were indirectly related to the objectives of this study. In fact, to the extent of the current
researchers knowledge, no line of research has been conducted to investigate any of the
objectives of this study in an Iranian EFL context.

One of the above-mentioned studies was conducted by Mahdavi-Zafarghandi (2005) on 57
students of dentistry at Guilan university of Medical Sciences. In this study, He gave an account
of the assessment of the extent to which students having successfully completed English for
Science and Technology (EST) courses failed to achieve any of the objectives of the EST course,
namely to understand educational films, and to read EST texts skillfully. Mahdavi-Zafarghandis
(2005) research showed that the students fell short of proficient listening and reading skills. He
suggested that listening be included into the curriculum.

The other study was conducted by Anari (2005) which dealt with what he considered to be the
main problems of ESP practice in Iran. He identified three major problems: unpreparedness of
the majority of students for their ESP courses, the ESP textbooks high level of difficulty, and
inappropriate materials design and development.

Using a mixture of personal experience and the theoretical views of such figures as Hutchinson
and Waters (1987), he has suggested certain ways of overcoming these problems. However, he
considered reading comprehension of the specialized texts in different fields of study to be the
main objective of the ESP course, and tried to investigate different obstacles in the way of
achieving this objective.


RESEARCH QUESTIONS
This study aimed at seeking answers to the following research questions which are all from the
perspective of ESP teachers:
1) Do ESP teachers generally agree with the presentation of ESP courses?
2) What should the objectives of ESP courses be?
International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
7

3) Which objectives are supported by the materials offered to students in ESP courses?
4) Do ESP teachers follow a process-oriented approach or a product-oriented one?
5) How do ESP teachers evaluate the texts and/or materials offered in ESP courses?
6) How do ESP teachers evaluate ESP courses offered?


METHODOLOGY
Participants
The participants of this study were 15 teachers (9 male and 6 female) teaching at different
departments at Bahonar and Azad Universities of Kerman, Iran. Five teachers from each of the
following departments were selected: Accounting Department, Sociology Department, the
Department of Trade Management, the Department of Economy, and the Department of Persian
literature. The departments from which these participants were selected were randomly chosen.
Also, random sampling was applied to select the teachers from the above mentioned departments.

Instruments
The instrument used in this study was a structured interview conducted by the current researcher
during which all the participants were consistently asked six questions each of which sought to
collect the required data related to one of the research questions of the study. The first question
was a Yes/No type question asking the subjects if they generally agreed with the presentation of
ESP courses. The second and third questions were open ended questions. The former asked the
participants about what the objectives of ESP courses should be, and the latter about whether
those objectives were supported by ESP texts and/or materials offered in ESP courses. The fourth
question, a two-choice question, asked about the emphasis of the ESP teachers on a) final exam
scores or b) class activities throughout the term. In fact, this item was intended to determine
indirectly whether the ESP teachers conducted a process-oriented approach or a product-oriented
one. Finally, the fifth and sixth questions were asked and scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 =
absolutely useful to 5 = absolutely useless). The former demanded the teachers to evaluate the
texts or materials offered in ESP courses, and the latter to evaluate the ESP course generally.

Data Collection Procedure
As the subjects of the present study were all university professors as well as ESP teachers, it was
actually difficult to find them all in one place and at a certain time. In fact, the researcher
managed to conduct the interviews with the subjects, and so to collect the necessary data, in
different locations such as computer sites for faculty members, different classes, and so on, and
over a period of eight months (about two-semester long).

All the subjects of the study were first assured about the fact that the results of this research
would be used for research purposes only. They were told that there is no right or wrong answer
to any of the questions and that they could leave the interview session at any time they would like
to. They were further assured that the information would be kept completely confidential.

Then, they were all consistently asked the six questions each of which sought to collect the
required data related to one of the research questions of the study. All the interviews were done
International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
8

individually and the subjects were asked one question at a time followed by any explanations if
necessary on the part of the interviewees. All interview sessions lasted about 10 to 15 minutes.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The teachers agreement or disagreement to present ESP courses
The collected data show that 13 teachers agreed and two teachers disagreed to present ESP
courses. The statistics related to simple frequencies and percentages are depicted in Table 1.

Table 1: The frequency distribution of the teachers agreement or disagreement to present ESP courses
f p
Yes 13 86.6
No 2 13.4
N 15 100

The teachers attitudes as to what the objectives of ESP courses should be?
The collected data indicate that ESP teachers believed that the objectives of ESP courses should
be improving first, the translation of specialized texts; second, the reading comprehension of
specialized texts; third the range of specialized vocabulary; fourth, the grammatical skills; and
finally, the writing of specialized texts (Table 2).

Table 2:The frequency distribution of the teachers attitudes as to what the objectives of ESP courses should be
Total p Total f Objectives
100 73.3
26.6
15 11
4
Yes
No
1.Translation of
specialized texts
100 60
40
15 9
6
Yes
No
2. Reading
comprehension
100 33.3
66.7
15 5
10
Yes
No
3. specialized
vocabulary
100 20
80
15 13
12
Yes
No
4. Grammatical
skills
100 13.3
86.7
15 2
13
Yes
No
5. Writing of
specialized texts

The teachers attitudes as to which objectives are supported by the materials?
The collected data indicate that ESP teachers believed that the objectives of ESP courses which
are practically supported by the ESP materials include improving first, the translation of
specialized texts; second, the reading comprehension of specialized texts; third the range of
specialized vocabulary; fourth, the grammatical skills; and finally, the writing of specialized texts
(Table 3).





International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
9

Table 3: The frequency distribution of the teachers attitudes as to which objectives are supported by the materials
Total p Total f Objectives
100 66.7
33.3
15 10
5
Yes
No

1.Translation of
specialized texts
100 46.6
53.4
15 7
8
Yes
No
2. Reading
comprehension
100 46.6
53.4
15 7
8
Yes
No
3. specialized
vocabulary
100 13.3
86.7
15 2
13
Yes
No
4. Grammatical
skills
100 6.6
93.4
15 1
14
Yes
No
5. Writing of
specialized texts

The teachers attitudes as to whether they follow a process-oriented approach or a product-
oriented one
The collected data show that four teachers believed that they emphasized more on the final exam
scores and 11 teachers believed that they emphasized more on class activities during the term.
The statistics related to simple frequencies and percentages are depicted in Table 4.

Table 4: The frequency distribution of the teachers attitudes as to whether they follow a process-oriented approach
or a product-oriented one
p f Type of emphasis
26.7 4 Final exam scores
73.3 11 Class activities
100 15 Total

The teachers evaluation of the texts and/or materials offered in ESP courses
Table 5 summarizes the statistics regarding the teachers assessment of the texts and/or materials
offered in ESP courses. It indicates that most of the teachers have evaluated the materials to be
useful.

Table 5: The frequency distribution of the teachers evaluation of the texts and/or materials offered in ESP courses
f p
Absolutely useful 2 13.4
Almost useful 3 20
useful 6 40
Almost useless 3 20
Absolutely useless 1 6.6
Total 15 100

The teachers general evaluation of the ESP courses offered
Table 6 summarizes the statistics regarding the teachers general assessment of the ESP courses
offered. It indicates that the majority of the teachers have evaluated the ESP courses to be useful
generally.



International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
10


Table 6: The frequency distribution of the teachers general evaluation of the ESP courses offered







Discussion
Regarding the first research question, the results of the present study show that 13 ESP teachers
(86.6 percent) agreed to present ESP and two (13.4 percent) disagreed to present ESP. This
possibly shows that most of the teachers consider ESP courses necessary to be presented. It may
also indicate that the teachers differentiate ESP from general English very well and know that
general English alone cannot fulfill their students future needs and that the students will have
some very specific needs in English.

Regarding the second research question, the results of the present study indicate that the ESP
teachers consider the skills of translation and reading comprehension of specialized texts as the
most important ESP objectives. In fact, this finding shows that the teachers are fully aware of
their own students needs as well as their future needs for translation and reading comprehension
of specialized texts. So they believe that the most important ESP objectives are the improvement
of these two skills.

Moreover, according to the results, ESP teachers considered improving the range of specialized
vocabulary as the third and grammatical skills as the fourth most important objectives of this
course implying that they are concerned about the specialized vocabulary and grammatical skills
that their students need or will possibly need for both translation and reading comprehension of
specialized texts. However, ESP teachers considered the writing of specialized texts as the least
important skill to be developed by ESP. This probably shows that either the ESP teachers believe
their students writing is already good enough or they can improve it on their own.

In accordance with the findings of the present study, ESP teachers have not mentioned improving
listening comprehension and/or speaking skills as any of the objectives which they think should
be included in ESP courses. This might be due to the fact that the teachers living in an EFL
context believe that their students will not possibly need the aural-oral skills in future and/or their
future careers, or that they can improve such skills by themselves or they may not need such
capabilities to continue their studies at higher academic levels.

Regarding the third research question, the results of the present study demonstrate that the
teachers believed that all the objectives they regarded as necessary for ESP courses were actually
reinforced by the presented materials in the same order of importance. This shows that there is a
complete agreement between what the teachers see as ESP objectives and what they regard as
being practically supported by the materials they present to their students.
f p
Absolutely useful 1 6.6
Almost useful 3 20
Useful 7 46.6
Almost useless 2 13.4
Absolutely useless 2 13.4
Total 47 100
International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
11

However, there is a slight reduction in the percentage points illustrating ESP teachers attitudes
as to which objectives are supported by the materials in comparison with those indicative of the
teachers attitudes as to what the objectives of ESP courses should be, with the case of specialized
vocabulary being an exception. Generally speaking, this decrease implies that ESP texts and/or
materials might need some revision to better support the objectives ESP teachers considered
important. This reduction is most notable in the case of reading comprehension which implies
that ESP texts and/or materials might need some special attention on the part of curriculum
developers and/or material designers in this respect, that is, improving reading comprehension
skill.

Regarding the fourth research question, the results of the present study illustrate that four
teachers (26.7%) believed that they emphasized more on the final exam scores and 11 teachers
(73.3%) believed that they emphasized more on class activities during the term. Therefore, it can
be concluded that the ESP teachers approaches to assess ESP students learning were mostly
process-oriented rather than product-oriented.

Regarding the fifth research question, the results of the present study show that just two teachers
(13.4%) have considered the presented materials and texts as absolutely useful and one teacher
(6.6%) has considered them as absolutely useless, whereas most of the teachers (40 %) have
regarded the materials to be useful. This probably indicates that the materials presented in ESP
courses were neither absolutely appropriate nor absolutely inappropriate but were just proper
enough to fulfill ESP students needs. Once again, the implication might be for material designers
to try to modify ESP materials according to the objectives ESP teachers have considered
necessary to be covered by ESP materials.

Finally, regarding the sixth research question, the results of the current study demonstrates just
one teacher (6.6%) has considered the ESP courses as absolutely useful and four teachers
(13.4%) have considered them as absolutely useless, whereas most of the teachers (46.6 %) have
regarded the ESP courses to be useful. This might be because of the teachers awareness of their
students needs for ESP in future. However, it is likely that because of the teachers possible
awareness of other ways for their students to fulfill their needs on their own, some of them (about
27%) have regarded ESP as almost useless and useless.


CONCLUSIONS
Considering the above-mentioned findings and discussions, it can be concluded that the majority
of ESP teachers seem to be generally pleased with ESP courses and the materials they presented
to their students in these courses. Actually, most of them have considered ESP courses as useful
which shows that they believe these courses have been efficient to fulfill their needs.
Furthermore, the ESP teachers have reported that they conducted a process-oriented approach
rather than a product-oriented one to assess their learning, and that the main goals of ESP courses
have been first the translation of specialized texts and then reading comprehension of such texts
which, in their opinion, have also been supported by materials and texts they presented.

International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
12

There were some limitations conducting this study, including the small sample size and their
basis on just the specific sample of Iranian ESP teachers which raises concern about the
generalizability of the results. Moreover, the researchers of the present study encountered the
following two problems when collecting data which restricted the present study. First, the
cooperation of the ESP teachers with the researcher was very little, hence the researcher limited
the study just to 15 ESP teachers. Second, the curriculum developers attitudes towards ESP has
not been the focus of this study. Finishing with limitations, some recommendations for future
research are noteworthy. It would be worthwhile to examine the research questions among larger
samples in order to gain more conclusive results. Also, further studies could be done to
investigate curriculum developers attitudes towards ESP. The last suggestion for further studies
would be that they should include other qualitative tools such as diaries and think-aloud protocols
which might provide further insight into issues related to ESP.


REFERENCES
Anari, S. M. (2005). Obstacles to achieving the goal of ESP in universities. In G. R. Kiany and
M. Khayyamdar (Eds), Proceedings of the first national ESP/EAP conference. (Vol. I).
Tehran, SAMT.
Anthony, L. (2007). English for Specific Purposes: What does it mean? Why is it different?
Retrieved October 25, 2012, from http://www.ice.ous. ac.jp
Carter, D. (1983). Some propositions about ESP. The ESP Journal, 2, 131-137.
Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.). (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. (3
rd
ed.).
Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary
approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farhady, H. (2005). Reflections on and directions for ESP materials development in SAMT. In
G. R. Kiany and M. Khayyamdar (Eds), Proceedings of the first national ESP/EAP
conference. (Vol. III). Tehran, SAMT.
Fiorito, L. (2002). Teaching English for specific purposes. Retrieved October 25, 2012, from
http://www.UsingEnglish.com/
Gatehouse, G. (2001). Key issues in English for Specific Purposes (ESP)curriculum
development. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.khae-service.com/
Graves, K. (1996). Teachers as course developers. England: Cambridge University Press.
Hortas, J. D. (1995). English for Specific Purposes. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from
http://www. StudyUSA.com
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning- centered
approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johns, A. M., & Price-Machada, D. (2001). English for specific purposes (ESP): Tailoring
courses to students' needs-and to the outside world. In Johns, G. (1990). ESP textbooks:
Do they really exist? English for Specific Purposes, 9, 89-93.
Mahdavi-Zafarghandi, A. (2005). Failure of EST objectives. In G. R. Kiany and M. Khayyamdar
(Eds), Proceedings of the first national ESP/EAP conference. (Vol. II). Tehran, SAMT.
Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World
(IJLLALW)
!"#$%& ( )*+, -$#. /0123 141* !"#"$%& ()*#+, (- .
567789 //:;4/<*< = 67789 //:;4*/2> ///-+01121/-"#%
13

Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitioners guide. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall
International.
Sysoyev, P. V. (2000). Developing an English for Specific Purposes course using a learner
centered approach: A Russian experience. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. VI, No. 3,
March 2000. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Sysoyev-
ESP.html
Yildiz, S. (2004). Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from
http://www.eric.com

Bio Data
Amir Hamid Forough Ameri has an MA in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL).
His main research interests include psycholinguistics, learner variable as well as ESP. He
announces that this work has not been published elsewhere. He is currently teaching at Iran
Language Institute (ILI). He has already published two articles in the Iranian EFL Journal.

You might also like