- In 1962, Lazaro Tañedo executed a deed of sale regarding his future inheritance in favor of his eldest brother, Ricardo Tañedo. In 1981, Lazaro executed another deed of sale for the same property in favor of Ricardo. However, Lazaro also sold the same property to his children (the petitioners) in 1980.
- The petitioners filed for recission and damages, arguing the inheritance was meant for them based on documents from Lazaro and their grandfather. Ricardo presented a deed of revocation from Lazaro in 1981, but Lazaro later denied this deed.
- The Supreme Court ruled that (1) the 1962 sale of future inheritance was void, but the
- In 1962, Lazaro Tañedo executed a deed of sale regarding his future inheritance in favor of his eldest brother, Ricardo Tañedo. In 1981, Lazaro executed another deed of sale for the same property in favor of Ricardo. However, Lazaro also sold the same property to his children (the petitioners) in 1980.
- The petitioners filed for recission and damages, arguing the inheritance was meant for them based on documents from Lazaro and their grandfather. Ricardo presented a deed of revocation from Lazaro in 1981, but Lazaro later denied this deed.
- The Supreme Court ruled that (1) the 1962 sale of future inheritance was void, but the
- In 1962, Lazaro Tañedo executed a deed of sale regarding his future inheritance in favor of his eldest brother, Ricardo Tañedo. In 1981, Lazaro executed another deed of sale for the same property in favor of Ricardo. However, Lazaro also sold the same property to his children (the petitioners) in 1980.
- The petitioners filed for recission and damages, arguing the inheritance was meant for them based on documents from Lazaro and their grandfather. Ricardo presented a deed of revocation from Lazaro in 1981, but Lazaro later denied this deed.
- The Supreme Court ruled that (1) the 1962 sale of future inheritance was void, but the
Facts: - On October 20, 1962, Lazardo Taedo eec!ted a deed o" sa#e regarding $is future inheritance in "a%or o" $is e#dest brot$er, &icardo Taedo. - On Febr!ar' 2(, 19(0, Lazardo)s"at$er died and $e *ade a Affidavit of Conformity to t$e 1962 sa#e. - On +an!ar' 1,, 19(1, Lazardo eec!ted another deed of sale in "a%or o" &icardo regarding t$e sa*e #ot in 1962. --n Febr!ar' 19(1, &icardo #earned t$at Lazaro sold the same property to his children .petitioners/ t$ro!g$ a deed o" sa#e dated 0ece*ber 29, 19(0. - On +!ne 1, 19(2, &icardo registered t$e deed o" sa#e. 2etitioners t$en "i#ed "or recission and da*ages presenting doc!*ents "ro* t$e *atias .Fat$er/ and Lazardo s$o3ing t$at t$e in$eritance 3as to be gi%ing to t$e*. - &icardo presented a 40eed o" &e%ocation o" a 0eed o" Sa#e4 dated 5arc$ 12, 19(1, 3$erein Lazaro re%o6ed t$e sa#e in "a%or o" petitioners. Later Lazaro iss!ed a s3orn state*ent den'ing t$e deed o" re%ocation, b!t #ater testi"ied t$at $e so#d t$e propert' to &icardo and t$at a #a3'er #ater ind!ced $i* to se## $is propert' to $is c$i#dren. ISSUE7 1/-s t$e sa#e o" a "!t!re in$eritance %a#id8 2/-s t$e +an!ar' 12, 19(1 sa#e %a#id8 RULING7 1/ 9rt.1,:1 4no contract *a' be entered into !pon a "!t!re in$eritance ecept in cases epress#' a!t$orized b' #a3.4 t$e 1962 contract is %oid. But the 1981 sale is valid as not using future inheritance 2/9rt.1;:: i" i**o%ab#e propert' is so#d to di""erent b!'ers, o3ners$ip s$a## be#ong to t$e person ac<!iring it 3$o in good "ait$ "irst recorded it in t$e &egistr' o" 2ropert'. !etitioners failed to sho" #ad faith on Ricardo$s part Tria# =o!rt)s "indings on e%idence a""ir*ed in "a%or o" &icardo.