For this test first calculate the cumulative frequencies of the observations, in this case n = D = rel F rel F 17, so for the first observation 1/17=0.0588, for the second observation 2/17=0.1176, i i i etc Next, calculate the z-score of each observed cumulative frequency and determine and its probability from the z table. For negative z-scores the table probability is the expected ' cumulative frequency, for positive z-scores it is 1-z probability. D is the absolutei Di = rel Fi1 rel Fi difference between the observed and expected frequencies. D` is the difference betweeni the observed frequency and the next expected frequency, so for this table |0.0588 - 0.1736 = 0.1148|, |0.1176 0.2266 = 0.1090|, etc Find the largest value from either of these two columns (here it is 0.1983) and compare to the D table.
Ho: Village population density is not significantly different than normal. Ha: Village population density is significantly different than normal. (=0.05 n = 17 mean = 5.34 sd = 0.866
Dmax = 0.1983 DCritical = 0.207
Since 0.1983 < 0.207 accept Ho.
Village population density is not significantly different than normal (D0.1983, 0.10 > p > 0.05).
Normality Test
W/S Normality Test Equations taken from Kanji, 1993
w The W/S normality tests is a fairly simple test that require only the sample standard q = deviation and the data range. The test is based on the q statistic, which is the st udentized s range, or the range expressed in standard deviation units. This test should not be confused with the Shapiro-Wilks test, which is a more powerful normality test. The test statistic is q, which is compared to the critical q values from the table, w is the data range, and s is the standard deviation of the data. The critical q value is a range. If the calculated q value falls within this range Ho is accepted (the data are normal), Ho is rejected when the q values are outside the critical range (the data are not normal).
Note: The W/S test does a poor job of rejecting Ho when the data are very skewed, if data are clumped in the tails, or there are outliers. This test should only be used if the data are approximately symmetrical.
Ho: Village population density is not significantly different than Population normal. Village Density Ha: Village population density is significantly different than normal. Aranza 4.13 (=0.05 Corupo 4.53 San Lorenzo 4.69 s = 0.866 Cheranatzicurin 4.76 w = 3.6 Nahuatzen 4.77 Pomacuaran 4.96 3.6 q = = 3.74 Cocucho 5.04 0.962 Charapan 5.1 qCritical = 3.06 4.31 Pichataro 5.36 Comachuen 5.53
Sevina 5.75 Since 3.06 < q=3.74 < 4.31 accept Ho. Quinceo 5.94 Village population density is not significantly different than normal Nurio 6.06 (q3.74, p > 0.05). Turicuaro 6.19 Urapicho 6.3 Arantepacua 7.21 Capacuaro 7.73 Normality Test
DAgostinos D Normality Test Equations taken from Zar, 1984
T n +1| D = where T = i |Xi 3 2 n SS .
DAgostinos D test is a powerful test for departures from normality. Calculating D is relatively simple, but can become cumbersome without the use of a spreadsheet. First the data must be ordered from either smallest to largest or largest to smallest. The squared mean deviates are then calculated for each observation and the sum of squared deviates (SS) determined. Then (n + 1)/2 is subtracted from the order or rank (Xi) of each observation, where n is the sample size, and the result multiplied by the observation value. T is then the sum of these values. Since the range of D is fairly small, it is best to carry out the calculations to at least 5 decimal places. The test statistic D is compared to the critical D values from the table. If the calculated D value falls within this range Ho is accepted (the data are normal), Ho is rejected when the D values are outside the critical range (the data are not normal).
Ho: Village population density is not significantly Population Squared Mean Village i different than normal. Density Deviates Ha: Village population density is significantly different Aranza 4.13 1 1.46410 than normal. (=0.05 Corupo 4.53 2 0.65610 n = 17 San Lorenzo 4.69 3 0.42250 Cheranatzicurin 4.76 4 0.33640 n +1 17 +1 = = 9 Nahuatzen 4.77 5 0.32490 2 2 Pomacuaran 4.96 6 0.14440 T = (i 9)Xi Sevina 4.97 7 0.13690 T = (1 9)4.13+ (2 9)4.53+(17 9)7.73 Arantepacua 5.00 8 0.11560 T = 63.23 Cocucho 5.04 9 0.09000
Since 0.2587 < D = 0.26050 < 0.2860 accept H . Nurio 6.06 14 0.51840 o Turicuaro 6.19 15 0.72250 Village population density is not significantly different than normal (D0.26050, p > 0.20). Urapicho 6.30 16 0.92160
Capacuaro 7.73 17 5.71210 Mean = 5.34 SS = 11.9916