West Wight Alpacas land accessed off main road wellow Yarmouth Isle of wight PO41 continue siting of caravan for use as agricultural worers dwelling. Planning application is invalid because there is no material difference between it and Mr Payne's previous application which was refused in +ov "$! by the Planning Inspectorate. The owners have continued to put money into the business and now they have started to sell land 01)""2 to put bac. Into the business& suggesting
West Wight Alpacas land accessed off main road wellow Yarmouth Isle of wight PO41 continue siting of caravan for use as agricultural worers dwelling. Planning application is invalid because there is no material difference between it and Mr Payne's previous application which was refused in +ov "$! by the Planning Inspectorate. The owners have continued to put money into the business and now they have started to sell land 01)""2 to put bac. Into the business& suggesting
West Wight Alpacas land accessed off main road wellow Yarmouth Isle of wight PO41 continue siting of caravan for use as agricultural worers dwelling. Planning application is invalid because there is no material difference between it and Mr Payne's previous application which was refused in +ov "$! by the Planning Inspectorate. The owners have continued to put money into the business and now they have started to sell land 01)""2 to put bac. Into the business& suggesting
West Wight Alpacas land accessed off Main Road Wellow Yarmouth Isle Of Wight PO41
Continued siting of caravan for use as agricultural worers dwelling
!CP"#$%$1"&' P"$$%$("14 I object to this application for reasons including but not limited to: a) *alidit+ This Planning Application is invalid because there is no material difference between it and Mr Payne's previous application TCP!"#"$%& P"$'()$* which was refused in +ov *"$! by the Planning Inspector, This application is actually only an appeal against the appeal which should& by law& according to the Planning Inspectorate& have been made through the court& not the -PA, ,) -eed There is no need for an agricultural wor.er to reside on/site, This was the finding of the Planning Inspector& and the view of the -PA& and nothing has changed since then, c) .ustaina,ilit+ The sustainability of the business is highly uncertain, The owners have continued to put money into the business and now they have started to sell land 01)"&"""2 to put bac. into the business& suggesting a worsening of the business, They are still not paying sustainable living wages to any wor.ers& according to the application, 3urther large e4penses and operational cost are li.ely to fall on the business later this year as a result of d2 below, d) Change in legal and regulator+ environment 5637A and 896 re:uirements are li.ely to re:uire considerable e4penditure simply to comply with regulations, ;y the Autumn& 5637A e4pect to introduce new testing for bovine tuberculosis 0bT;2 and other procedures which have not been budgeted for, bT; in alpacas and llamas is becoming an increasingly worrying issue& both for human and animal health, Controls are e4pected to be introduced by the Autumn *"$)& according to 5637A, If animal/movement restrictions are brought/in the entire business model may become obsolete and it is hard to see how the business could continue in its dual agricultural and tourism niche, <hen I spo.e to 5637A on *# th %une *"$) they told me that the consultation period had ended and that while the ;ritish Alpaca 9ociety 0;A92 are still lobbying 5637A the outcome is not certain to go in ;A9's favour, This might also reduce the worth of alpacas in the => mar.et generally& reducing the capital base of <est <ight Alpacas, The ?overnment has a long/term commitment to ma.e the whole of 6ngland an @fficially ;ovine Tuberculosis 3ree 9tatus Aone and a 9trategy document was issued in April *"$) In parallel& there has been a BConsultation on tuberculosis 0T;2 animal disease controls for deer and camelidsC which closed on # th May, The 8D9 re:uirements as laid down in various government documents suggest that considerable wor.s will be re:uired to ma.e the alpaca farm 8D9 compliant particularly but not e4clusively to reduce the ris. of 6,coli "$E' and a repeat of the '?odstone' incident, I have wor.ed on a fuller report however I have received correspondence from Mr and Mrs Payne's solicitors and I need to see. some advice before presenting a full case against the application, I have discussed this with the Case @fficer and it has been agreed that my full submission will be made at a later time after further discussions with the -PA, 3or this reason& my submission at this time before the cut/off date of *' th %une is not complete or supported with the documentation that will follow,