British Columbia School Trustees say they are not "reliable" or "good" in times like these. Are they being "honest" or "effective" in protecting children's education, says sally kohn. Kohn: If you have been put in place to oversee and protect something is your inaction "good"
British Columbia School Trustees say they are not "reliable" or "good" in times like these. Are they being "honest" or "effective" in protecting children's education, says sally kohn. Kohn: If you have been put in place to oversee and protect something is your inaction "good"
British Columbia School Trustees say they are not "reliable" or "good" in times like these. Are they being "honest" or "effective" in protecting children's education, says sally kohn. Kohn: If you have been put in place to oversee and protect something is your inaction "good"
To The British Columbia School Trustees Association,
A Trustee, according the Merriam Webster Dictionary, is one to whom something
is entrusted. The word Trustee is derived from the word trust which, according to the same dictionary is the belief that someone or something is reliable, good, honest, effective, etc. Entrenched in the very title of the position, you accepted, is your role to act on behalf of those that have entrusted you with protecting their childrens education.
As a parent I would hope that someone, whose very title, calls on them to be reliable, must speak up in times like these. I have not heard very much from school Trustees. For whatever reason, only a brave few have stood up and voiced their opinion on this job action. Does this make you reliable? Can parents count on you to protect what they have entrusted you with?
What about being good. If you have been put in place to oversee and protect something is your inaction good? I know as a parent I start to question why a Trustee would not speak out. When they see their districts falling into debt, constantly cutting services, would it not be good to stand up against such tyranny. Is it good to hold on to some personal belief that you may keep some political doors open by staying complacent? To sit in the corner with your mouth held closed because you dont want to stir the pot? Well, as people keep telling teachers, you took the job and all of the responsibility that comes with it.
How about being honest? Are you being honest? By keeping quiet and sitting on the sidelines are you being honest about what is happening to public education? Because, by remaining silent, you are saying that what the government is doing is alright with you. You are telling the people that have entrusted you with their children, that below average funding is alright with you, that cutting much needed programs and services are alright with you, and that increased costs to districts without a matching increase in funds is alright with you. If you are being honest is this alright with you?
Lastly, is what you are doing effective? Are you making the education of the children entrusted to you better? According to the British Columbia School Trustees (BCSTA) website [t]rustees engage their communities in building and maintaining a school system that reflects local priorities, values and expectations. I would hazard a guess that most parents would expect that you speak up and demand proper funding as a priority, a local priority. I would argue that letting things get worse is not effective unless you support the governments priority, which does not seem to fit into this statement. I have not heard one parent within my community say, below average funding is good, lets cut more specialist teachers, I love when apprenticeship programs close down! I am however, pretty sure it is part of the governments mandate to allow the degradation of public education, to turn parents against teachers, to place stress on the districts so that they have to cut programs, to put pressure on parents to make the decision to move to the private system, and to put more public money into the private system increasing the income gap. By staying silent you are effectively helping this course of action. As Premier Clark stated in her mandate letter to Education Minister Peter Fassbender [t]he only way to secure long-lasting prosperity is to ensure that private sector investments are welcomed and encouraged in our province. That is the path we have chosen and that is the path upon which we will continue for the remainder of our term. If you dont stand up against this obvious move to privatize education, are you being effective. Are you protecting the children that you have been entrusted with? Remember you have a lot of them to protect considering that, according to Statscan, BC has the highest Child Poverty rate in Canada.
According to the BCSTAs own Strategic Priorities a positive relationship with the Ministry of Education seems to be number one. However, at this point it seems that other strategies are being ignored, for example: Strongly advocate for the statutory, meaningful involvement of Boards of Education in the K-12 bargaining mandate and process. Are you being effective in this mandate by remaining silent? What about your Core Priorities? Things like [i]ncreased predictable, and stable funding for Boards of Education, [s]uccess for all students, and engag[ing] media on a strategic basis. A good and effective strategy for engaging media would be to stand up and explain how increased predictable, and stable funding creates success for all students.
With the further privatization of education and continued below average funding will the children entrusted to you have equal opportunity to the best education this province can provide? Can the parents of you districts count you as someone who is reliable? Is what you are currently doing good and effective? Now ask yourself, are you being honest? I trust that you will do what is right.