CCNA 3 - Module 6

1. Refer to the exhibit. Which three statements describe the network design shown
in the exhibit? (Choose three.)
- This design will not scale easily.
- The roter merges the !"#$s into a single broadcast domain.
- This design ses more switch and roter %orts than are necessary.
- This design exceeds the maximm nmber of !"#$s that can be attached to a
switch.
- This design re&ires the se of the '(" or )*+.1& %rotocol on the links between
the switch and the roter.
- 'f the %hysical interfaces between the switch and roter are o%erational, the
de-ices on the different !"#$s can commnicate throgh the roter.
+. # roter has two .ast/thernet interfaces and needs to connect to for !"#$s in
the local network. 0ow can this be accom%lished sing the fewest nmber of
%hysical interfaces withot nnecessarily decreasing network %erformance?
- 'm%lement a roter-on-a-stick configration.
- #dd a second roter to handle the inter-!"#$ traffic.
- 1se a hb to connect the for !"#$( with a .ast/thernet interface on the roter.
- 'nterconnect the !"#$s -ia the two additional .ast/thernet interfaces.
2. Refer to the exhibit. #ll de-ices are configred as shown in the exhibit. 3C+ can
sccessflly %ing the .*4* interface on R1. 3C+ cannot %ing 3C1. What might be
the reason for this failre?
- R1 interface .*41 has not been configred for sbinterface o%eration.
- (1 interface .*45 needs to be configred for o%eration in !"#$1*.
- (1 interface .*4) is in the wrong !"#$.
- (1 %ort .*45 is not in !"#$1*.
6. Refer to the exhibit. The commands for a roter to connect to a trnked %link
are shown in the exhibit. # %acket is recei-ed from '3 address 17+.15).1.86. The
%acket destination address is 17+.15).1.1+*. What will the roter do with this
%acket?
- The roter will forward the %acket ot interface .ast/thernet *41.1 tagged for
!"#$ 1*.
- The roter will forward the %acket ot interface .ast/thernet *41.+ tagged for
!"#$ 5*.
- The roter will forward the %acket ot interface .ast/thernet *41.2 tagged for
!"#$ 1+*.
- The roter will not %rocess the %acket since the sorce and destination are on the
same sbnet. - The roter will dro% the %acket since no network that incldes the
sorce address is attached to the roter.
8. What distingishes traditional roting from roter-on-a-stick?
- Traditional roting is only able to se a single switch interface. Roter-on-a-stick
can se mlti%le switch interfaces.
- Traditional roting re&ires a roting %rotocol. Roter-on-a-stick only needs to
rote directly connected networks.
- Traditional roting ses one %ort %er logical network. Roter-on-a-stick ses
sbinterfaces to connect mlti%le logical networks to a single roter %ort.
- Traditional roting ses mlti%le %aths to the roter and therefore re&ires (T3.
Roter-on-a-stick does not %ro-ide mlti%le connections and therefore eliminates
the need for (T3.
5. Which statement is tre abot #R3 when inter-!"#$ roting is being sed on
the network?
- When roter-on-a-stick inter-!"#$ roting is in se, each sbinterface has a
se%arate 9#C address to send in res%onse to #R3 re&ests.
- When !"#$s are in se, the switch res%onds to #R3 re&ests with the 9#C
address of the %ort to which the 3C is connected.
- When roter-on-a-stick inter-!"#$ roting is in se, the roter retrns the 9#C
address of the %hysical interface in res%onse to #R3 re&ests.
- When traditional inter-!"#$ roting is in se, de-ices on all !"#$s se the same
%hysical roter interface as their sorce of %roxy #R3 res%onses.
:. What two statements are tre regarding the se of sbinterfaces for inter-!"#$
roting? (Choose two.)
- sbinterfaces ha-e no contention for bandwidth
- more switch %orts re&ired than in traditional inter-!"#$ roting
- fewer roter %orts re&ired than in traditional inter-!"#$ roting
- sim%ler "ayer 2 trobleshooting than with traditional inter-!"#$ roting
- less com%lex %hysical connection than in traditional inter-!"#$ roting
). Which three elements mst be sed when configring a roter interface for
!"#$ trnking? (Choose three.)
- one sbinterface %er !"#$
- one %hysical interface for each sbinterface
- one '3 network or sbnetwork for each sbinterface
- one trnked link %er !"#$
- a management domain for each sbinterface
- a com%atible trnking %rotocol enca%slation for each sbinterface
7. Refer to the exhibit. Which two statements are tre abot the o%eration of the
sbinterfaces? (Choose two.)
- 'ncoming traffic that has a !"#$ '; of + is %rocessed by sbinterface fa*4*.+.
- 'ncoming traffic with !"#$ '; * is %rocessed by interface fa*4*.
- (binterfaces se ni&e 9#C addresses by adding the )*+.1< !"#$ '; to the
hardware address.
- Traffic inbond on this roter is %rocessed by different sbinterfaces, de%ending
on the !"#$ from which the traffic originated.
- Reliability of both sbinterfaces is %oor becase #R3 is timing ot.
- =oth sbinterfaces remain % with line %rotocol %, e-en if fa*4* line %rotocol is
down.
1*. Refer to the exhibit. 3ort .a*4* on roter R1 is connected to %ort .a*41 on
switch (1. #fter the commands shown are entered on both de-ices, the network
administrator determines that the de-ices on !"#$ + are nable to %ing the
de-ices on !"#$ 1. What is the likely %roblem?
- R1 is configred for roter-on-a-stick, bt (1 is not configred for trnking.
- R1 does not ha-e the !"#$s entered in the !"#$ database.
- (%anning Tree 3rotocol is blocking %ort .a*4* on R1.
- The sbinterfaces on R1 ha-e not been broght % with the no shtdown
command yet.
11. Refer to the exhibit. 3C1 has attem%ted to %ing 3C+ bt has been nsccessfl.
What cold accont for this failre?
- 3C1 and R1 interface .*4*.1 are on different sbnets.
- The enca%slation is missing on the R1 interface .*4*.
- #n '3 address has not been assigned to the R1 %hysical interface.
- The enca%slation command on the R1 .*4*.2 interface is incorrect.
1+. Refer to the exhibit. R1 is roting between networks 17+.15).1*.*4+) and
17+.15).2*.*4+). 3C1 can %ing R1 interface .*41, bt cannot %ing 3C2. What is
casing this failre?
- 3C1 and 3C2 are not in the same !"#$.
- The 3C2 network address configration is incorrect.
- The (1 interface .*411 shold be assigned to !"#$2*.
- The .*4* and .*41 interfaces on R1 mst be configred as trnks.
12. ;e-ices on the network are connected to a +6-%ort "ayer + switch that is
configred with !"#$s. (witch %orts *4+ to *46 are assigned to !"#$ 1*. 3orts
*48 to *4) are assigned to !"#$ +*, and %orts *47 to *41+ are assigned to !"#$
2*. #ll other %orts are assigned to the defalt !"#$. Which soltion allows all
!"#$s to commnicate between each other while minimi>ing the nmber of %orts
necessary to connect the !"#$s?
- Configre %orts *412 to *415 with the a%%ro%riate '3 addresses to %erform
roting between !"#$s.
- #dd a roter to the to%ology and configre one .ast/thernet interface on the
roter with mlti%le sbinterfaces for !"#$s 1, 1*, +*, and 2*.
- ?btain a roter with mlti%le "#$ interfaces and configre each interface for a
se%arate sbnet, thereby allowing commnication between !"#$s.
- ?btain a "ayer 2 switch and configre a trnk link between the switch and roter,
and configre the roter %hysical interface with an '3 address on the nati-e !"#$.
16. Which two statements are tre abot the interface fa*4*.1* command? (Choose
two.)
- The command a%%lies !"#$ 1* to roter interface fa*4*.
- The command is sed in the configration of roter-on-a-stick inter-!"#$
roting.
- The command configres a sbinterface.
- The command configres interface fa*4* as a trnk link.
- =ecase the '3 address is a%%lied to the %hysical interface, the command does not
inclde an '3 address.
18. Refer to the exhibit. What two conclsions can be drawn from the ot%t that is
shown? (Choose two.)
- The no shtdown command has not been issed on the .ast/thernet *4*
interface.
- =oth of the directly connected rotes that are shown will share the same %hysical
interface of the roter.
- # roting %rotocol mst be configred on the network in order for the inter-!"#$
roting to be sccessfl.
- 'nter-!"#$ roting between hosts on the 1:+.15.1*.*4+6 and 1:+.15.2*.*4+6
networks is sccessfl on this network.
- 0osts in this network mst be configred with the '3 address that is assigned to
the roter %hysical interface as their defalt gateway.
15. What are the ste%s which mst be com%leted in order to enable inter-!"#$
roting sing roter-on-a-stick?
- Configre the %hysical interfaces on the roter and enable a roting %rotocol.
- Create the !"#$s on the roter and define the %ort membershi% assignments on
the switch.
- Create the !"#$s on the switch to inclde %ort membershi% assignment and
enable a roting %rotocol on the roter.
- Create the !"#$s on the switch to inclde %ort membershi% assignment and
configre sbinterfaces on the roter matching the !"#$s.
1:. Refer to the exhibit. The network administrator correctly configres RT# to
%erform inter-!"#$ roting. The administrator connects RT# to %ort *46 on (W+,
bt inter-!"#$ roting does not work. What cold be the %ossible case of the
%roblem with the (W+ configration?
- 3ort *46 is not acti-e.
- 3ort *46 is not a member of !"#$1.
- 3ort *46 is configred in access mode.
- 3ort *46 is sing the wrong trnking %rotocol.
1). What is im%ortant to consider while configring the sbinterfaces of a roter
when im%lementing inter-!"#$ roting?
- The %hysical interface mst ha-e an '3 address configred.
- The sbinterface nmbers mst match the !"#$ '; nmber.
- The no shtdown command mst be gi-en on each sbinterface.
- The '3 address of each sbinterface mst be the defalt gateway address for each
!"#$ sbnet.
17. 'n which sitation cold indi-idal roter %hysical interfaces be sed for
'nter!"#$ roting, instead of a roter-on-a-stick
configration?
- a network with high traffic re&irements
- a network with a limited nmber of !"#$s
- a network with ex%erienced s%%ort %ersonnel
- a network sing a roter with one "#$ interface
+*. Refer to the exhibit. (witch1 is correctly configred for the !"#$s that are
dis%layed in the gra%hic. The configration that is shown was a%%lied to RT# to
allow for inter!"#$ connecti-ity between hosts attached to (witch1. #fter testing
the network, the administrator logged the following re%ort@
0osts within each !"#$ can commnicate with each other.
0osts in !"#$8 and !"#$22 are able to commnicate with each other.
0osts connected to .a*41 throgh .a*48 do not ha-e connecti-ity to host in other
!"#$s.
Why are hosts connected to .a*41 throgh .a*48 nable to commnicate with
hosts in different !"#$s?
- The roter interface is sht down.
- The !"#$ ';s do not match the sbinterface nmbers.
- #ll of the sbinterface addresses on the roter are in the same sbnet.
- The roter was not configred to forward traffic for !"#$+.
- The %hysical interface, .ast/thernet*4*, was not configred with an '3 address.