Satellites broadcast a radio signal towards the Earth 2. Receivers record the signal and convert it into satellite-receiver distances 3. Post-processing consist of converting these distances into positions Precision:! $100 receiver! 100 m! $10,000 receiver! 1 mm "
Satellites broadcast a radio signal towards the Earth 2. Receivers record the signal and convert it into satellite-receiver distances 3. Post-processing consist of converting these distances into positions Precision:! $100 receiver! 100 m! $10,000 receiver! 1 mm "
Satellites broadcast a radio signal towards the Earth 2. Receivers record the signal and convert it into satellite-receiver distances 3. Post-processing consist of converting these distances into positions Precision:! $100 receiver! 100 m! $10,000 receiver! 1 mm "
Earthquake distribution is not random: very narrow deforming zones
(= plate boundaries) versus large areas with no earthquakes (= rigid
plate interiors) Tectonic plates and their boundaries today -- continents are embedded in the plates and move with them Ocean-ocean subduction ! island arc Oceanic spreading center ! creation of new oceanic crust Ocean-continent subduction ! volcanism Continental rift ! break-up of a continent Lithospheric plates float on a viscous mantle. Deformation (e.g., earthquakes) occur at their boundaries: divergent (spreading centers), convergent (subductions), or strike-slip Transform fault ! strike-slip motion lithosphere viscous mantle viscous mantle lithosphere The Global Positioning System Three steps: 1. Satellites broadcast a radio signal towards the Earth 2. Receivers record the signal and convert it into satellite-receiver distances 3. Post-processing consist of converting these distances into positions Precision: ! $100 receiver ! 100 m ! $10,000 receiver ! 1 mm Principle of GPS positioning satellite 1 Earth " 1 satellite 3 " 3 " 2 You are here x " 2 satellite 2 Satellites broadcast signals on 1.2 GHz and 1.5 GHz frequencies: Satellite 1 sends a signal at time t e1 Ground receiver receives it signal at time t r The range measurement ! 1 to satellite 1 is: ! 1 = (t r -t e1 ) x speed of light We are therefore located on a sphere centered on satellite 1, with radius ! 1 3 satellites => intersection of 3 spheres Or use the mathematical model: A! The receiver clocks are mediocre and not synchronized with the satellite clocks Time difference between the satellite clocks and the receiver clock Additional unknown => we need 4 observations = 4 satellites visible at the same time 2 2 2 ) ( ) ( ) ( r s r s r s s r Z Z Y Y X X ! + ! + ! = " Principle of GPS positioning GPS data = satellite-receiver range measurements (!) Range can be measured in two ways: 1. Measuring the propagation time of the GPS signal: Easy, cheap Limited post-processing required As precise as the time measurements ~1-10 m 2. Counting the number of cycles of the carrier frequency More difficult Requires significant post-processing As precise as the phase detection ~1 mm Earth x t e t r data = (t r -t e ) x c data = # x n # ~ 20 cm From codes: From carrier: (unit = meters) (unit = cycles) Principle of GPS positioning ! GPS phase equation (units of cycles): ! Range model: ! Phase equation linearized ! Form a system of n_data equations for n_unknowns (positions, phase ambiguities, tropospheric parameters) ! Solve using weighted least squares (or other estimation techniques) ! End product: position estimates + associated covariance ! " i k (t) = # i k (t) $ f c + h k (t) % h i (t) ( ) $ f + ion i k (t) + trop i k (t) % N i k +& ! " i k = (X k # X i ) 2 + (Y k #Y i ) 2 + (Z k # Z i ) 2 " = phase measurement = DATA ! i k = geometric range = CONTAINS UNKNOWNS X i ,Y i ,Z i X k ,Y k ,Z k = satellite positions (GIVEN) t = time of epoch i = receiver, k = satellite f = GPS frequency, c = speed of light h k = satellite clock error, h i = receiver clock error ion i k = ionospheric delay, trop i k = tropospheric delay N i k = phase ambiguity, $ = phase noise Principle of GPS positioning !Precise GPS positioning requires: Dual-frequency equipment Rigorous field procedures Long (several days) observation sessions Complex data post-processing Magnitude Treatment Error source ~ 1 cm Use correction tables Antenna phase center ~ 0.5 m Choose good sites! Multipath ??? Choose good operators! Site setup centimeters Precession, Nutation, UT, Polar motion Geodetic models centimeters Tides (polar and solid Earth), Ocean loading Geophysical models 2 cm to 100 m Get precise (2-3 cm) orbits Satellite orbits 1-50 m Dual frequency measurements Ionospheric refraction 0.5-2 m External measurement or estimation of tropospheric parameters Tropospheric refraction meters Double difference or direct estimation Receiver clock errors ~1 m Double difference or direct estimation Satellite clocks errors < 1 mm None Phase measurement noise Campaign measurements Continuous measurements ! Field strategy: Network of geodetic benchmarks perfectly attached to bedrock -- Separation typically 10-100 km 2 to 3 measurement sessions of 24 hours ! Advantages: Large number/density of sites with few receivers Relatively low cost ! Problems: Transient deformation Monumentation and antenna setup ! Typical setup: Antenna mounted permanently on a stable geodetic monument, measurements 24h/day, 365 days/year Site protected and unattended Data downloaded daily or more frequently if needed (and if possible) ! Advantages: Better long-term precision Better detection of transient signals ! Problems: Cost and number of sites Power and communication Continents show consistent pattern of displacement They move at speeds ~few cm/yr = the speed your fingernails grow Repeated GPS measurements show that the longitude of Algonquin (Canada) is changing at a rate of 1.5 cm/yr Norabuena et al. (1999): deceleration back to at least 20 My, initiation of Andes growth Consequence of construction of the Andes? Increased friction and viscous drag as leading edge of Sa thickens? Norabuena et al., Science, 1998 Hutton et al., GJI, 2001 Jalisco earthquake, October 1995, Mw=8.0 Episodic Tremors and Slip Dragert et al., Science 2001 http://www.pgc.nrcan.gc.ca/seismo/ETS/ETS.htm Juan de Fuca subduction Typical interseismic strain accumulation Episodes of aseismic slip every 13 to 16 months Typically 10 day long, 5 mm surface displacement Episodic Tremors and Slip Modeling shows: ~ 2 cm slip on the subduction Slip area ~50 km x 300 km Depth of ~25 km to 45 km Equivalent to a M6.7 earthquake (similar to 2001 Nisqually earthquake near Seattle) Cause? Consequences? (e.g. for future earthquakes) Vertical motions: post-glacial rebound, up to cm/yr Sella et al., 2007 Time dependent vertical motions: hydrological loading VanDam et al., 2001 Bevis et al., 2005 Comparison between GPS observations at Manaus (Amazonian basin, red dots) and the predicted flexure of an elastic plate under water loading. A model of the peak-to-peak amplitude of vertical motions due to hydrological loading (=water + snow)