This document discusses emotional dissonance (E-D) in employees and its organizational causes and consequences. It proposes a model to understand the organizational factors that lead to E-D in employees. The model identifies seven main E-D causal factors including role ambiguity/conflict, unfavorable work environment, lack of organizational justice, strict decision-making processes, low perceived organizational support, poor communication practices, and work-family conflict. The document also discusses moderators like social support that can impact the relationship between E-D causal factors and consequences like reduced organizational commitment.
This document discusses emotional dissonance (E-D) in employees and its organizational causes and consequences. It proposes a model to understand the organizational factors that lead to E-D in employees. The model identifies seven main E-D causal factors including role ambiguity/conflict, unfavorable work environment, lack of organizational justice, strict decision-making processes, low perceived organizational support, poor communication practices, and work-family conflict. The document also discusses moderators like social support that can impact the relationship between E-D causal factors and consequences like reduced organizational commitment.
This document discusses emotional dissonance (E-D) in employees and its organizational causes and consequences. It proposes a model to understand the organizational factors that lead to E-D in employees. The model identifies seven main E-D causal factors including role ambiguity/conflict, unfavorable work environment, lack of organizational justice, strict decision-making processes, low perceived organizational support, poor communication practices, and work-family conflict. The document also discusses moderators like social support that can impact the relationship between E-D causal factors and consequences like reduced organizational commitment.
Employees Emotional Dissonance : The Organizational
Causal Factors, Consequences and Moderators Nitin Arora Timothy A Falade ABSTRACT This paper examines the subject of emotional dissonance(E-D) in its cause and effect form. The literature utilized to find the various causes of emotional dissonance of employees are broken down to few causal factors known as E-D causal factors. Further, these E-D causal factors were categorized into two heads: favourable E-D causal factors and unfavourable E-D causal factors. The categorization act was done to ease down the selection of factors by the service sector employers out of given set of E-D causal factors so as to be most effective in minimizing the Emotional dissonance of employees while implementing the antidote. The selection of factors was done carefully after reading the empirical direction of variable in the chosen literature. Keywords : Emotional dissonance, emotional labor, organizational consequences, Work-lifeConflict INTRODUCTION Employee should hide their inner whirlpool of feelings everywhere and everytime else service sector oriented organizations might loose customer base. This is just the es- sence of preaching of employers to their employees during the employees ongo- ing tenure bombarded with events lead- ing to emotional dissonance. The inner conflict, the emotional display rules, the customer interaction techniques etc. is what that needs to be understood by the implications of emotional dissonance. Invertis Journal of Management Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011 pp 7-15 IJM/3(1)/8 Employee emotions are inseparable from the workplace. Many researchers have since specified emotional dissonance as a dimension of the emotional labor con- struct. In addition, emotional dissonance has been empirically established as a rea- son for negative outcomes of emotional labor (Prati, 2004). Since emotional disso- nance is considered as a stressor (Mont- gomery, Panagopolou & Benos, 2005) for employees, the effort of this paper is dedi- cated to find out those Emotional disso- nances causal factors that lead to Emotional Dissonance. Emotional dissonance is of more concern to the Service sector as the level of interaction of employees with the customers is significantly higher. Hence, the chances of employees emotional spillover to the customer are very high and needs close attention. Consequently, an employees emotional display is no longer a private experience, but a public act that is controlled by employer supervision. Rules for emotional display are therefore developed, and training programs are being made mandatory for the employees to adhere (Chu, 2002). THE RESEARCH OBJECTIVE The research will encompass factors due to which an employee (atleast having a supervisory grade) is finding himself / herself into a dilemma, or a unspeakable situation or similar emotionally decisive situations which can have a marked in- fluence on Organizational Commitment. The research is focused towards the fol- lowing three-fold objectives 1. What organizational factors constitute Emotional Dissonance (ED) as a whole 2. Categorizing those factors into favourable and unfavourable ED Fac- tors 3. The determination of moderating fac- tors which can catalyze appropriately the relationship between the ED causal factors and the Organizational Com- mitment. EMOTIONAL DISSONANCE : 360 DEGREE OVERVIEW The service literature has documented rea- sons of how critical employees emotional display is in determining customers ser- vice quality perceptions. First, customer- contact employees are the interface be- tween customers and organizations, and thus represent the organization to custom- ers. If an employee is rude to a customer, this rudeness will leave nothing but a bad impression about the company in the customers mind. Second, the nature of service (i.e., intangibility, heterogeneity, variability, and inseparability between service providers and customers) makes the interaction between employees and customers a critical component in deter- mining customers perceptions of service quality. The following 360 degree over- view will shed light on the E-D factors in- dicating the premium that is placed on them. EMOTIONAL LABOUR : THE BASIS OF EMOTIONAL DISSONANCE It was in her 1983 book : The Managed Heart: The commercialization of feeling that Arlie Russell Hochschild first coined the term Arora &
Falade IJM/3(1)/9 emotional labor to refer to the manage- ment of feeling to create a publicly observ- able facial and bodily display (Johnson, n.d). When our job roles require us to dis- play particular emotions and suppress oth- ers, we do our emotion management for a wage. Hochschild termed this regulation of ones emotions to comply with occupa- tional or organizational norms as emo- tional labor. She defined emotional labor as the management of feeling to create a publicly observable facial and bodily dis- play; emotional labor is sold for a wage and therefore has exchange value (Chu, 2002). The inability of the employees to cope up with this expected display rules leads to an inner conflict and is known as Emotional Dissonance (a gap between felt emotions and expressed emotions). This understand- ing is further complexed by seven dimen- sionsfrequency of emotional displays, varieties of emotional displays and the at- tentiveness to the required display rules, object of focus, depth of acting, and effect of emotional manipulation on employee (gender issues), conflict between genuinely felt emotion and organizationally pre- scribed emotions (Chu, 2002; Johnson, n.d.). In comparison with Hochschilds (1983) perspective, Ashforth and Humphrey (Grandey, 2000) were more concerned with emotional labor as an observable be- havior than as a management of feelings. In addition, they argued that emotional la- bor does not necessarily require conscious effort. In fact, they suggested that surface and deep acting may become routine and effortless for the employee, rather than sources of stress. Morris and Feldman (Grandey, 2000) defined emotional labor as the effort, planning, and control needed to express organizationally desired emotion dur- ing interpersonal transactions. Based on the past literature survey a model is proposed in this study that makes an effort to un- derstand the Organizational causes and consequences emotional dissonance. EMOTIONAL DISSONANCE CAUSAL FACTORS (See Fig1 : The Proposed Model) a. Role ambiguity/conflict : It leads to anxiety in the employees, formation of unclear expectations (Gregersen & Black, 1992; Szilagyi, Sims & Keller, 1976) making employees emotionally drained and leading them to a di- lemma (Leiter & Maslach, 1988)
which further exacerbates the emotional dis- sonance of employees. b. Organization work environment : The work environment collectively constitutes a source of emotional dis- sonance to the employees. The sys- tem i.e. bureaucratic and political (Randall etal, 1999); work obstruction, workplace mistreatment and emo- tional neglect (Harlos & Axelrod, 2005) contributes to the building up of emo- tional dissonance. c. Organizational Justice : Fair treatment in various organizational decisions is ex- pected by employees but if not received becomes the cause of employees emo- tional dissonance. Emotional dissonance arises due to discrimination in Employees Emotional Dissonance : The Organizational.... Moderators IJM/3(1)/10 employees promotion (Bagdali & Paoletti, 2000) policies, biased distribu- tion of organizational resources (Brewer, 1996), and biased procedural and dis- tributive justice practices. d. Organizational decision Making : The strict control of centralization system of decision making (Bateman & Strasser, 1984), and futility of em- ployees psychological participation (Brewer, 1996)
in Organizational key decision points causes a sense of aloofness and brings mild to big shock to employees thereby forcing them to be in the state of emotional dissonance for long time. e. Perceived Organization Support : Perceived organizational support is the degree to which the employees perceived the organization supportive and value their individual contribu- tions. If the employees perceive this Arora &
Falade Fig. 1 : The Proposed Model ANTECEDENTS ORGANIZATIONAL CONSEQUENCES MODERATORS IJM/3(1)/11 organization support, the sense of emotional bonding, family member like feeling is achieved else the emo- tional dissonance inside i.e. the feel- ing of getting neglected and sense of unimportance happens leading to re- duced employee commitment (Schaubroeck & Fink, 1998). f. Organization Communication : Emo- tional dissonance also arises due to vari- ous bad communication practices adopted by organization like top man- agement attitude towards organizational silence, communication opportunities, policies on repatriation (Gregersen & Black, 1992) and rules of organization (Vandenberghe & Peiro, 1999). g. Work-family Conflict : The potential conflicting influence of family on work attitudes cant be subdued. The rel- evant factors which influence the em- ployee commitment are Spouse sup- port, family work conflict (Saheffer etal, 2001), home demands and em- ployee characteristics (Heymann etal, 2003), work schedule and quality of family life, and wifes employment (Parsuraman etal, 1989). MODERATORS Displayed emotions will not only be seen as characteristic of the individual, but will be ascribed to the organization as well (Johnson, n.d.). Hence, the relationship between emotional dissonance and the organizational factors like Organization commitment, Job satisfaction needs to be moderated. a. It is proposed that Social Support as an organizational characteristic, buff- ers the negative effects of emotional labor (Chu, 2002). Social support which includes peer support, super- visor support, friendship and other significant support acts as a modera- tor that minimizes the impact of emo- tional exhaustion on the Job satisfac- tion and Professional satisfaction (Tetrick, et al., 2000), Organization commitment (Abraham, 1999). b. Researchers have believed that the ef- fect of emotional dissonance on its consequences also depends on other variables including Job Characteristics like Job autonomy (Chu, 2002), job control and working conditions. c. Individual factors i.e. age (Williams & Laaker, 2002), gender (Erickson & Ritter, 2001), emotional intelligence and emotional expressivity and affec- tivity are also capable to influence the spillover effect of emotional disso- nance on Individual well being and Organizational well-being (Totterdell & Holman, 2003). d. Low self-esteem individuals will ex- perience greater dissatisfaction and emotional exhaustion from emotional dissonance and vice versa. Self Esteem acts as a moderator to the relationship between emotional dissonance and Job satisfaction (Abraham, 1999). e. Self-monitoring (Abraham, 1999) moderates the emotional dissonance- job satisfaction relationship; high self- Employees Emotional Dissonance : The Organizational.... Moderators IJM/3(1)/12 monitors experience significantly less dissatisfaction than low self-moni- tors. Self monitoring is the ability to control expressive behaviour to match the expression and self-presentation of others in social situations. THE ORGANIZATIONAL CONSEQUENCES The emerging consequences due to face to face interaction with emotional disso- nance are mentioned as under : Positive Consequences a. Jobs involving emotional dissonance, requiring more emotional labor, are more satisfying than those not involv- ing emotional labor. Therefore, if or- ganizations choose frontline service employees based on their interper- sonal skills and individuals seek jobs compatible with their personality, the fit between job demands and per- sonal qualities may be high in these positions, thereby leading to in- creased Job satisfaction 5 and Organi- zational Commitment (Gregersen & Black, 1992; Brewer, 1996). Negative Consequences a. Emotional exhaustion or Burnout is a specific stress-related reaction that re- fers to a state of depleted energy caused by the excessive psychological and emotional demands that occur among individuals who work with people in some capacity (Griffin, 2003; Johnson, n.d.). Burnout is a stress out- come that is comprised of three dimen- sions, emotional exhaustion, deper- sonalization (Rozilio, n.d.), and re- duced personal accomplishment. Burnout will occur if an employee is emotionally invested in interactions with customers and has little recourse to recuperate from the drain on emo- tional resources. It comes along with (1) Contact overload is a recognizable syndrome in interactive work, whose symptoms include becoming robotic, detached, and unempathetic and (2) feeling of inauthenticity (Wharton, 1999) which is the probable silent killer of employees commitment. Further, there is a clear correlation be- tween ones emotional state and ones physical state. The efforts to display positive emotions or suppress nega- tive emotions often lead to patterns of physiological response that presage somatic illness. THE IMPLICATIONS OF E-D CAUSAL FACTORS Many service sector organizations like hos- pitals (Zammuner, Loot & Galli, 2003; Chu, 2002; Arsenault, Dolan & Amerunger, 1991) retail stores, call centres (Rozilio, n.d.), schools (Dormann & Kaiser, 2002; Arunkumar, Midglev & Urdan, n.d.), air- lines (Ashforth & Humphrey, 1992), po- lice department (Gaines & Jermier, 1983), banks (debt collectors) (Rozilio, n.d.), courts, counselling and guidance (insur- ance, stock broking companies, telecom, monitor their workers to assure that they are expressing the right kind of emotion to their customers (Sutton & Rafaeli, 1988). Arora &
Falade IJM/3(1)/13 Employee evaluations may serve to elimi- nate those employees who do not fit as rep- resentatives of the organization in a service or sales capacity. Organizations do main- tain the use of reward and punishment sys- tems to maintain display rules once social- ization has been completed. The implica- tions of this investigation are particularly important to human resource profession- als, especially to those who manage em- ployees in the service sectors. The areas where this research may have significant impact include selection, training, and evalu- ation. CONCLUSION The natural emotion expressed is just an effect of the E-D factors taken alone or to- gether on the employees interaction with customers in daily affair. Positive emo- tional states in employee plays a major role in their organizations success or failure. Emotions directly influence organizations competitive advantage in todays market- place -Intellectual Capital, Customer Ser- vice, Productivity, Employee Attraction and Retention. Selling more products, dealing with customer complaints ad- equately, ensuring the smooth-running of communicative interactionseven ob- taining confessions from criminals are all positive outcomes thought to be associ- ated with the performance of emotional work. No customer wants to deal with a surly waitress, a crabby bank clerk or a flight attendant who avoids eye contact. 1. This study should be quite useful to the promotion of further research in the areas of emotional labor, emotional intelligence, and general stress re- search. For organizations with a great number of jobs reflecting emotional labor as a primary job requirement, the knowledge this research provides may serve those organizations well in con- trolling for some of the negative con- sequences like employee absenteeism and turnover. 2. Emotions are used as a strategy of in- fluence at both the organizational and Individual levels. Informal training programs for emotional intelligence may be as effective as formal learning situations to prevent the formation of emotional dissonance and thereby minimizing the drastic physical, emo- tional and economical consequences arising consequently. 3. The moderators eg. Social support, self monitoring etc (as mentioned above) should be suggested to the employees to reduce their E-D influence on orga- nizational consequences namely orga- nizational affective commitment. REFERENCES Abraham, R. (1999). Emotional dissonance in or- ganizations: Conceptualizing the roles of self-esteem and job-induced tension. Leader- ship & Organization Development Journal. 20(1), 1825. Arsenault, A., Dolan, S.L. , Ameringer, M.R.V. (1991). Stress and mental strain in hospital work: Exploring the relationship beyond per- sonality. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. 2(6), 483-493. Arunkumar, R. , Midglev, C., Urdan, T. (n.d.). Per- ceiving high or low home-school dissonance longitudinal effects on adolescents emotional Employees Emotional Dissonance : The Organizational.... Moderators IJM/3(1)/14 and academic well being. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 9(4), 441-466. Ashforth, B.E., Humphrey, R.H. (1992). Emo- tional labor in service roles: The Influence of Identity. TheAcademy of Management Review. 18(1), 88-115. Bagdadli, S., Paoletti, F. (2000). The Importance of Organizational Justice In Promotion De- cisions. Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research (MURST). Bateman, T.S., Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. TheAcademy of Management Journal. 27(1), 95-112. Brewer, A.M. (1996). Developing commitment be- tween managers and employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 11(4), 24-34. Chu, K.H.L. (2002). The effects of emotional la- bor on employee work outcomes. [PhD The- sis]. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Dormann, C., Kaiser, D.M. ( 2002). Job conditions and customer satisfaction. European Journal of Work And Organizational Psychology. 11(3), 257283 Erickson, R.J., Ritter C. (2001). Emotional labor, burnout, and inauthenticity: Does gender matter?. Social Psychology Quarterly. 64(2), 146-163. Gaines, J. , Jermier, J.M. (1983). Emotional exhaus- tion in higher stress organization. TheAcad- emy of Management Journal. 26(4), 567-586. Grandey, A.A. (2000), Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 5(1), 95-110 Gregersen, H.B., Black, J.S. (1992). Antecedents to commitment to a parent company and a foreign operation. TheAcademy of Manage- ment Journal. 35(1), 65-90. Griffin, A.E.C. (2003). Display rules for expressed emotion within organizations and gender : Implications for emotional labor and social place marking. [PhD Thesis]. Texas: Gradu- ate Studies of Texas A&M University. Harlos, K.P., Axelrod, L.J. (2005). Investigating hospital administrators experience of work- place mistreatment. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. 37(4), 262-272. Heymann, J ., Baldry, C., Scholrios, D., & Bunzel, D.(2003). Work life imbalance in call centre and software development. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 41(2), 215-239. Johnson, H.A.M.(n.d.). The story behind service with a smile: The effects of emotional labor on job satisfaction, emotional exhaustion, and affective well-being. [PhD Thesis]. Florida: College of Arts and Sciences, Uni- versity of South Florida. Leiter, M.P., Maslach, C. (1988). The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment. Journal of Orga- nizational Behavior. 9(4), 297-308. Montgomery, A.J. , Panagopolou, E, Benos, A. (2005). Emotional labour at work and at home among greek health-care profession- als. Journal of Health Organization and Man- agement. 19 (4/ 5), 395-408. Parsuraman, S; JH Greenhaus; S Ravinowitz; AG Bedeiau & KW Mossholder (1989). Work and family variables as mediators of the relation- ship between wives employment and husbands well being. TheAcademy of Man- agement Journal. 32(1), 185-201. Prati, L.M. (2004). Emotional intelligence as a fa- cilitator of the emotional labor process. [PhD Thesis]. Florida: The Florida State University College of Business. Randall, M.L., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C.A., Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and orga- nizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 20(2), 159-174. Arora &
Falade IJM/3(1)/15 Rozilio, R. (n.d.). Anger, emotional dissonance and general cognitive performance: The cost of being nice to angry customers. Haifa: Technion Israel Institute of Technology, In- dustrial Engineering and Management. Schaubroeck, J., Fink, L.S. (1998). Facilitating and inhibiting effects of job control and social support on stress outcomes and rol e behaviour: A contingency Model. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. 19(2), 167-195. Shaeffer, M.A., Harrison, D.A., Gilley, K.M., Luk, D.M. (2001). Struggling for balance amid tur- bulence on international assignments: Work- family conflict support and commitment. Journal of Management. 27, 99-121. Sutton, R.I. , Rafaeli, A. (1988). Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: The case of conve- nience stores. TheAcademy of Management Journal. 31(3), 461-487 Szilagyi, A.D. Jr., Sims, H.P., Keller, RT. (1976). Role dynamics, locus of control, and em- ployee attitudes and behaviour. TheAcademy of Management Journal. 19(2), 259-276 Tetrick, L.E. , Slack, K.J. Silva, N.D. , Sinclair, R.R. (2000), A comparison of the stress-strain pro- cess for business owners and non-owners: Differences in job demands, emotional ex- haustion, satisfaction, and social support; Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 5(4), 464-476 Totterdell, P. and Holman, D. (2003), Emotion regulation in customer service roles : Testing a model of emotional labor. Journal of Occu- pational Health Psychology. 8(1), 5573. Vandenberghe , C., Peir, J.M. (1999). Organiza- tional and individual values: their main and combined effects on work attitudes and per- ceptions. European Journal of Work and Orga- nizational Psychology. 8(4), 569581. Wharton, A.S. (1999), The psychosocial conse- quences of emotional labor; annals of the american academy of political science. Emo- tional Labor in theServiceEconomy. 561, 158- 176 Williams, P. and Laaker, J. (2002). Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist? Journal of Con- sumer Research, Inc. . 28, 636-649. Zammuner, V.L. , Lotto, L. , Galli, C. (2003). Regu- lation of emotions in the helping professions: Nature, antecedents and consequences. Aus- tralian E-Journal for TheAdvancement of Men- tal Health. Vol 2(1). Employees Emotional Dissonance : The Organizational.... Moderators