Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philosophy of Religion
Robby K. Magee
The Soul of Science
I tend to enjoy reading books that focus on scientific issues from a Christian
perspective. Although The Soul of Science was a great book, it was a very challenging
read to say the least. For this reason, I will treasure the information gained and will most
likely read it again in the near future to gain an even better understanding of what its
authors Charles Thaxton and Nancy Pearcey look to convey. J.P. Moreland says this
book would be “an excellent text for courses on science and religion.” James Sire says
“this book should destroy for all time the persistent myth that Science and Christianity
I am not a scientist so this was a very tough book for me to wrap my arms
around. I was looking for answers to the history of science and why the rest of the world
has turned its back on Christian Science (as a majority). The answers I would later find
were fascinating and enlightening to say the least. The underlying philosophy of science
and Christianity creates a new perspective for the unknowing Christian. We no longer
need to consider Christianity apart from Science because Christianity was the “soil in
which Science was planted.” Science in and of itself is a devised method to observe and
empirically study or predict outcomes under factual circumstances. What I had not
realized were the philosophical underpinnings that must exists to allow Science to
succeed. Science begins with a presupposition that our world is real. Not all societies
have agreed to this, hence the reason many societies developed and disappeared
without the utilization of scientific reasoning. Our Christian worldview says there is both
a God, and a world that God created. This caused early scientists to understand the
world that God created which translated into a means of knowing God and praising Him.
I was also intrigued by the notion that there is some kind of hostility between
The Soul Of Science
Philosophy of Religion
Robby K. Magee
science and Christianity. Thaxton and Pearcey prove this to be false because the only
presuppositions. The basic philosophies described by the authors are: Aristotelian, Neo-
believed that all forms of motion are accomplished because of inherent purpose that is
built into an object. Aristotle described things by using terminology from living organisms
and not machines. Aristotelianism viewed God as a rational mind whose thoughts are
believed the world was a living organism. Their explanation is where the difference was.
Natural forms were disregarded and the power of spiritual forces were regarded as
divine and possible avenues for the world to remain. The mechanistic worldview
rejected Aristotelianism and Neo-Platonism because it did not see the world as an
organism but as a machine with God at the control panel calling the shots. I might even
picture a locomotive engineer with the throttle and steering wheel ready to drive.
The Soul of Science had a good technical section on DNA and yet another on
mathematics. Some of the terminology used was quite advanced and required the use
evidence has now convinced me that my faith is only blind to the fact that we are
fearfully and wonderfully made. I sincerely believe that DNA can prove this faith.
The Soul of Science has helped me to look beyond the facts I have taught by
secular secondary education and learn from a Christian theistic perspective. From an
apologetic standpoint, I believe every seminarian should read this book. From a
Christian standpoint, I believe every pastor should read this book. Thanks to Dr. Howell
for the assignment. Max Planck wrote perhaps the best quote towards science: “Over
The Soul Of Science
Philosophy of Religion
Robby K. Magee
the entrance to the gates of the temple of science are written the words: ‘Ye must have
faith.’”