Tesco 1

Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit CAPR v1 Job Ref: 10070710155 Date: Nay 22, 2007
Page 1 of 8

Audit Type
Third Party (Sedex Associate Auditor) First Party
Third Party (Commercial) Second Party
Third Party (NGO) Nulti-stakeholder
Third Party (Union)

Bureau Veritas CPS
Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit

Audit Details

REPORT #: 10070710155
Audit Date: May 22,2007
Date of Follow-Up Audit: N/A
Audit Type: !nitial Re-Audit Follow-Up ____ (1,2,3.)
Previous Audit date: NfA
Previous Audit type: Re-Audit Follow-Up ____ (1,2,3.)
Date CAPR Last Updated
N/A
Supplier Name: Ginger Clothing Pvt. Ltd.
Auditor Name{s): NS.Noovendranf N.Babukumar
Facility Country: !ndia
Facility Name: Ginger Clothing Pvt. Ltd.
Facility Contact: Nr.Rahul Dev Singh
Contact Title: Factory Nanager
Facility Address # 3f275 Annur Nain Road, Kittampalayam ( Post) Karumatham patti, Coimbatore- 6+1 659
Facility Address: Tamil Nadu,!ndia
Facility Phone: +91-+22-2362127f3097185
Facility E-Mail: Rahul@gingerclothing.com

Products Being
Manufactured at Facility e.g
Garments, Electricals, Toys
Knitted Garments- Men's, Ladies & Children

NfC N
o
New or
Carried
Over
Details Recommended
Corrective
Actions
Recommended
Completion
Timescale
verification
Nethod
(Desktop or
Follow-Up audit)
Agreed by
Nanagement
(YfN) and
name of
responsible
person
verification
EvidencefComments
Status
(ClosedfOpen)
The
reference
number of
the non-
compliance
from the
Audit
Report
e.g H8S
No. 7

!s this a new
non-
compliance
identified at
the follow-up
or an old one
that is still
outstanding,
and therefore
Carried
Over".
Type N or C
Details of Non-Compliance Details of actions
to be taken to
clear non-
compliance
Timescale
(!mmediate, 30,
60, 90,180,365)
Desktop f
Follow-Up
Note if
management
agree to the
non-
compliance,
and document
name of
responsible
person
Details on corrective
action evidence taken by
factory.
OpenfClosed or
comment

Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (CAP) V1 09.05.06 .doc Page 2 of 8
Guidance:
The Corrective Action Plan Report summarizes the factory audit findings and a corrective and preventative action plan that both the auditor and the factory
manager believe is reasonable to ensure conformity with the ET! Base Code, Local Laws and additional audited requirements. After the initial audit, the form is
used to rerecord actions taken and to categorise the status of the non-compliances and potential issues.
Please note that the recommended completion date should be discussed between the factory management and the auditor at the closing meeting to agree on
realistic timeframes. This date is only guidance and it is the responsibility of the factory to discuss exact dates or changes with their local client contact if
appropriate.
Next Steps:
1. The factory shall request via Sedex that the audit body uploads the audit report and non-compliances to sedex
2. The factory shall action its non-compliances and document its progress via Sedex
3. Once the factory has effectively progressed through its actions then is shall request via Sedex for the audit body to verify its actions.
+. The audit body shall verify corrective actions taken by the factory by either" Desktop" review process via Sedex.
5. However some non-compliances that cannot be closed off by Desk-Top review may need to be closed off via a 1 Day Follow Up audit" charged at
normal fee rates. !f this is then case then the factory will be notified after it's submission of documentary evidence relating to that non-compliance.

!f you have not registered with Sedex or do not know how to request the upload of your audit report the please take the following actions..
For information on registering with Sedex please go to www.sedex.org.uk
For information on requesting a report to be uploaded or for corrective actions to be verified then please see the various information sources
below..
- Guidance Notes on the Sedex web site (Only if you have already registered)
OR
- !nformation on the original audit booking form that the payee of this audit completed
OR
- The www.cps.bureauveritas.com/sedex web page

NfC N
o
New or
Carried
Over
Details Recommended
Corrective
Actions
Recommended
Completion
Timescale
verification
Nethod
(Desktop or
Follow-Up audit)
Agreed by
Nanagement
(YfN) and
name of
responsible
person
verification
EvidencefComments
Status
(ClosedfOpen)
The
reference
number of
the non-
compliance
from the
Audit
Report
e.g H8S
No. 7

!s this a new
non-
compliance
identified at
the follow-up
or an old one
that is still
outstanding,
and therefore
Carried
Over".
Type N or C
to be taken to
clear non-
compliance
Timescale
(!mmediate, 30,
60, 90,180,365)
Desktop f
Follow-Up
Note if
management
agree to the
non-
compliance,
and document
name of
responsible
person
factory.
OpenfClosed or
comment


H8S # 1

N
No safety guards such as
Needle guards to 6 single
sewing machines, pulley
guards to 7 sewing
machines and 2 Genset
motor were provided.
The factory
shall provide
necessary
safety guards
to all the
machines and
equipments as
per local law.

!mmediate Follow up
audit
Yes
Nr.Rahul
Factory
Nanager

H8S # 2

N
Detailed medical
examination has not been
done for the 3 canteen
workers employed through
contract.

Factory shall
ensure that
detailed
medical
examination,
including the
routine and
bacteriological
testing of
faeces and
urine for
germs of
dysentery and
typhoid fever,
routine blood
examination
and other
examination
30 days Desktop Yes
Nr.Rahul
Factory
Nanager

NfC N
o
New or
Carried
Over
Details Recommended
Corrective
Actions
Recommended
Completion
Timescale
verification
Nethod
(Desktop or
Follow-Up audit)
Agreed by
Nanagement
(YfN) and
name of
responsible
person
verification
EvidencefComments
Status
(ClosedfOpen)
The
reference
number of
the non-
compliance
from the
Audit
Report
e.g H8S
No. 7

!s this a new
non-
compliance
identified at
the follow-up
or an old one
that is still
outstanding,
and therefore
Carried
Over".
Type N or C
to be taken to
clear non-
compliance
Timescale
(!mmediate, 30,
60, 90,180,365)
Desktop f
Follow-Up
Note if
management
agree to the
non-
compliance,
and document
name of
responsible
person
factory.
OpenfClosed or
comment

including
chest X rays
are done for
the 3 canteen
workers as per
law.

Wages
# 1

N Overtime wages are not
paid at double the rate of
the normal wages.

The factory
shall pay the
workers
overtime rate
of wages
(twice the
ordinary rate
of wages)
based on the
current
minimum rate
of wages as
per local law.

30 days Follow up
audit
Yes
Nr.Rahul
Factory
Nanager

Wages
# 2

N ContributionsfDeductions
were not made on the
overtime wages towards
the Employees State
!nsurance.
The factory
shall ensure to
make
contributionsf
deductions for
30 days Follow up
audit
Yes
Nr.Rahul
Factory
Nanager

NfC N
o
New or
Carried
Over
Details Recommended
Corrective
Actions
Recommended
Completion
Timescale
verification
Nethod
(Desktop or
Follow-Up audit)
Agreed by
Nanagement
(YfN) and
name of
responsible
person
verification
EvidencefComments
Status
(ClosedfOpen)
The
reference
number of
the non-
compliance
from the
Audit
Report
e.g H8S
No. 7

!s this a new
non-
compliance
identified at
the follow-up
or an old one
that is still
outstanding,
and therefore
Carried
Over".
Type N or C
to be taken to
clear non-
compliance
Timescale
(!mmediate, 30,
60, 90,180,365)
Desktop f
Follow-Up
Note if
management
agree to the
non-
compliance,
and document
name of
responsible
person
factory.
OpenfClosed or
comment

overtime
wages paid to
the workers
towards the
Employees
State
!nsurance
Scheme.

Working
Hours #
1

N Overtime hours worked by
the workers exceed the
legal limits of 2 hoursfday,
12 hoursfweek and 50
hoursfquarter.

Factory shall
ensure to
carry out the
overtime
hours as
specified in
the local law.

30 days Follow up
audit
Yes
Nr.Rahul
Factory
Nanager

Working
Hours #
2

N Factory did not obtain the
approval from the
concerned authority for
the employment of women
workers after 7pm for
overtime hours.

The factory
shall obtain
the approval
to employ
women
workers after
7 pm for the
overtime work
as per law.

30 days Desktop Yes
Nr.Rahul
Factory
Nanager

NfC N
o
New or
Carried
Over
Details Recommended
Corrective
Actions
Recommended
Completion
Timescale
verification
Nethod
(Desktop or
Follow-Up audit)
Agreed by
Nanagement
(YfN) and
name of
responsible
person
verification
EvidencefComments
Status
(ClosedfOpen)
The
reference
number of
the non-
compliance
from the
Audit
Report
e.g H8S
No. 7

!s this a new
non-
compliance
identified at
the follow-up
or an old one
that is still
outstanding,
and therefore
Carried
Over".
Type N or C
to be taken to
clear non-
compliance
Timescale
(!mmediate, 30,
60, 90,180,365)
Desktop f
Follow-Up
Note if
management
agree to the
non-
compliance,
and document
name of
responsible
person
factory.
OpenfClosed or
comment


Code
and
System
#1

N
Factory did not issue leave
book for the reference to
individual workers.

The factory
shall ensure to
issue the
Leave Book
for individual
workers in the
prescribed
formats as per
law.

30 days Follow up
audit
Yes
Nr.Rahul
Factory
Nanager

Code
and
System
#2

N Renewed factory license
was not obtained as the
present factory license
expired on December 31 ,
2006.

Factory shall
ensure to
obtain the
renewed
factory license
as per law.

30 days Desktop Yes
Nr.Rahul
Factory
Nanager

Environ
mental#
1
N Consent for operationf
NOC for air and water
were not renewed by the
factory.

Factory shall
ensure to
obtain the
renewed
consents for
Air and Water
from Local
Pollution
Control Board
as per the
+5 days Desktop Yes
Nr.Rahul
Factory
Nanager

NfC N
o
New or
Carried
Over
Details Recommended
Corrective
Actions
Recommended
Completion
Timescale
verification
Nethod
(Desktop or
Follow-Up audit)
Agreed by
Nanagement
(YfN) and
name of
responsible
person
verification
EvidencefComments
Status
(ClosedfOpen)
The
reference
number of
the non-
compliance
from the
Audit
Report
e.g H8S
No. 7

!s this a new
non-
compliance
identified at
the follow-up
or an old one
that is still
outstanding,
and therefore
Carried
Over".
Type N or C
to be taken to
clear non-
compliance
Timescale
(!mmediate, 30,
60, 90,180,365)
Desktop f
Follow-Up
Note if
management
agree to the
non-
compliance,
and document
name of
responsible
person
factory.
OpenfClosed or
comment

local law.

Potential Issues
Nil

Please sign this document confirming that the above findings have been discussed with and understood by you (facility management)
Factory Representative Signature:
Mr.Rahul Dev Sigh - Signed -

Auditor Signature
NS MoovendranJN.Babukumar - Signed -

Title:
Factory Nanager

Auditors - BvCPS!
Date:
Nay 22,2007
Date:
Nay 22,2007

Please indicate below if you the factory
management dispute any of the findings

! dispute the following numbered non-compliances
Nil

Signed:------ Rahul Dev Sigh -----------------------
Factory Comments:

Agreed all the findings. We will take appropriate corrective actions with in maximum of +5
days or as per the agreed time scale.

NfC N
o
New or
Carried
Over
Details Recommended
Corrective
Actions
Recommended
Completion
Timescale
verification
Nethod
(Desktop or
Follow-Up audit)
Agreed by
Nanagement
(YfN) and
name of
responsible
person
verification
EvidencefComments
Status
(ClosedfOpen)
The
reference
number of
the non-
compliance
from the
Audit
Report
e.g H8S
No. 7

!s this a new
non-
compliance
identified at
the follow-up
or an old one
that is still
outstanding,
and therefore
Carried
Over".
Type N or C
to be taken to
clear non-
compliance
Timescale
(!mmediate, 30,
60, 90,180,365)
Desktop f
Follow-Up
Note if
management
agree to the
non-
compliance,
and document
name of
responsible
person
factory.
OpenfClosed or
comment

Note to facility: This CAP will be subject to a final review by Bv technical personnel. Changes maybe made regarding non-compliances, recommended
corrective actions or timescales. !f on receiving the final CAP you do not agree with these changes then you are entitled to dispute them by completing the
above box and returning to Bv. Please note that Bv only Recommends" corrective actions and timescales. This do not mean that you and your clients cannot
agree a different set of criteria.

Tesco 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tesco 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit CAPR v1 Job Ref: 10070710155 Date: Nay 22, 2007

You might also like