Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit (Report) Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 2 of 19 Audit Conducted By Third Party (Sedex Associate Auditor) First Party Third Party (Commercial) Second Party Third Party (NGO) Nulti-stakeholder Third Party (Union)
Bureau Veritas SEDEX Members Ethical Trade Audit
Audit Details
REPORT #: 10070710155 Date of Audit: May 22,2007 Audit Type: !nitial Follow-Up __ (1,2,3.) Re-audit Previous audit date: N/A Previous audit type: NfA Follow-Up __ (1,2,3.) Re-audit Report Date: May 29,2007 Supplier Name: Ginger Clothing Pvt. Ltd. Auditor Name{s): NS.Moovendran & N.Babukumar Report Written by: NS.Moovendran Report Reviewed by: Prashant Bhandare Facility Country: India Facility Name: Ginger Clothing Pvt. Ltd. Facility Contact: Mr.Rahul Dev Singh Contact Title: Factory Manager Facility Address: # 3/275 Annur Main Road, Kittampalayam (Post) Karumatham patti, Coimbatore- 641 659,Tamilnadu, India. Facility Phone: +91-422-2362127/3097185 Facility Fax: // Facility E-Mail: Rahul@gingerclothing.com Time DAY 1Time Arrive On site: 11.00am Time Leave Site: 5.00pm
Products Being Manufactured at Facility e.g. garments, electricals, toys Knitted Garments- Men's, Ladies & Children
This report provides a summary of the findings and other applicable information foundfgathered during the social audit conducted on the above date only and does not officially confirm or certify compliance with any legal regulations or industry standards. The social audit process requires that information be gathered and considered from records review, worker interviews, management interviews and visual observation. Nore information is gathered during the social audit process than is provided here. The audit process is a sampling exercise only and does not guarantee that the audited facility prior, during or post-audit are in full compliance with the Code being audited against. The provisions of this Code constitute minimum and not maximum standards, and this Code should not be used to prevent companies from exceeding these standards. Companies applying this Code are expected to comply with national and other applicable law and where the provisions of law and this Code address the same subject, to apply that provision which affords the greater protection. The ownership of this report remains with the party who has paid for the audit. Release permission must be provided by the owner prior to release to any third parties. Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 3 of 19
Audit Scope Details Please select the Code and Additional Requirements that were audited against during this audit
ET! Base Code A: Entitlement to Work 8 !mmigration B: Code and System !mplementation C: Sub-Contracting 8 Homeworking Additional Requirements
D: Environmental
Note: The main focus of this ethical audit is on the ET! Base Code and local law. The additional elements A,B,C,D will not be audited with such depth or scope but the audit process will still highlight any specific issues.
Non-Compliance Table
Area of Non-Conformity (Only check box when there is a non- conformity)
Issue ETI Base Code Local Law Additional Elements Rating (Currently only to be completed as a specific client requirement)
1 Employment Freely Chosen 2 Freedom of Association 3 Safety and Hygienic Conditions + Child Labour 5 Wages and Benefits 6 Working Hours 7 Discrimination 8 Regular Employment 9 Harsh or !nhumane Treatment A Entitlement to Work B Code 8 System !mplementation C Sub-Contracting 8 Home-working D Environment
Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page + of 19
Audit Overview
Facility Description: (!nclude size, location, age, structure, number of buildings)
The audited factory Ginger Clothing Pvt Ltd., was established in April 2005 at # 3/275 Annur Main Road, Kittampalayam (Post) Karumatham patti, Coimbatore- 641 659,Tamilnadu, India. The factory premises are situated in a total area of 37,000 sq.ft and the factory has one main and two ancillary building blocks as follows.
Main Block: Office, Store room, Checking, Sewing, Cutting and Finishing Ancillary Block 1: Canteen /Dining hall, Creche and Rest room Ancillary Block 2: Dormitory (Not in use)
The factory employs about 182 employees (Staff-29, Workers-145 and Security-8) of them 63 were Male and 119 were Female. On the day of audit 110 employees were present (Staff-29, Workers-76 and Security-5) of them 48 were Male and 62 were Female.
Factory works from 08:30 to 17.20 hours with a lunch break from 12.40 13.10 hours and 2 tea breaks from 10.30 - 10.40 hours and 15.10-15.20 hours. As per reviewed records and worker interviews, overtime is carried out for 2 hours per day from 18.00 20.30 hours (3 to 6 days in a week). The working days are Monday to Saturday and Sunday is weekly off day for all. The factory is manually recording the time In and Out of the workers. Workers are paid on daily basis and the wages are distributed on or before 7 th of every next month.
Based on the management interview, the factory didnt have any peak and lean season as the orders are distributed evenly throughout the year. Factory provided attendance and payroll records for the last one year. Factory has employed 8 security guards through Globe Detective Agency on contract basis.
Process Overview: (!nclude products being produced, main operations, number of lines, main equipment used)
This factory is manufacturing and exporting mens, ladies and kids Knitted garments like T-Shirts, Outer wears. Factory has not done any orders for the client so far. Factory has Cutting, Sewing, Checking, Ironing and Packing processes inside the premises and the total production capacity is 75,000 pieces/month. Factory has Juki, Sirupa and Brother branded sewing machines. 8 Ramsons branded Ironing machines in the ironing section and 2 stain removing machines in the Finishing section, one needle detector (conveyor type) machine and one Strapping machine in the packing section.
Attitude of Workers: (!nclude their attitude to management, workplace and the interview process. Both positive and negative information should be included) Note: Do not document any information that could put workers at risk
Auditors conducted interviews of 26 randomly selected workers individually and in groups. Interview was conducted by the auditors confidentially without the presence of factory management. Workers were happy with the working environment of the factory, both with respect to treatment by management as well as working conditions. Employees were aware of workplace requirements. It was observed that the workers responded spontaneously and they were not coached for interview.
Summary of Main Findings: (positive and negative)
Management stated they are in the process of implementing the WRAP requirements as they are going for WRAP certification next month. The factory management was courteous during the entire audit process and adequately co- operative.
Non-compliances were observed in the area of Working conditions are safe and hygienic like safety guards such as needle guards/pulley guards were not provided to the machines and medical examination for the canteen workers has been carried out. Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 5 of 19
Non-compliances were observed in the area of Living wages are paid like Overtime wages are not paid at double the rate of the normal wages and the ESI Contributions/Deductions were not made on the overtime wages. Non-compliances were observed in the area of Working hours are not excessive like Working hours exceed for production workers and no approval to employ women workers after 7.00pm
Non-compliances were observed in the area of Code and system implementation like leave book was not issued to individual workers and the renewed factory license was not obtained.
Non-compliances were observed in the area of environmental like Consent for operation/ NOC for air and water were not renewed by the factory.
All the findings were discussed with the management in the closing meeting. The management was receptive of all the findings and give the auditors the probable deadline to take appropriate corrective actions.
Facility activities e.g. growingfpackingfmachining Cutting, Sewing, Finishing, Checking and Packing Where appropriate records available to verify hours of worker and wage compliance: Yes No !f no" refer to comments in summary section Applicable business and other legally required licence numbers: e.g. (liability insurance) CB 1273+ Nonth(s) of peak season (if applicable): NfA Normal Work Days: e.g. Non Sat Nonday to Saturday Nax. overtime hours found (per day, week, month): 2 hoursf day, 15 hoursfweek and 29 hoursfmonth (April 2007) What is the general overtime pay rate? Double the rate of normal wages Overtime paid correctly? Yes No Approx. 160 of the rate of normal wages given for overtime instead of 200 Combined hours (reg. 8 OT) over 60 per week found? Yes No !f Yes" refer to comments in summary section
of piece rate workers (if applicable) NfA !s there any night production work at the facility? Yes No Factory works overtime maximum from 18.00 to 20.30 Hrs. of workers living in dorms (if applicable): NfA (Note: Factory has got 14 rooms at the dormitory, which were used in the past. As of now, these rooms are kept unused due to administrative reasons and the workers have been relocated to their own living place out side the factory). Are workers paid by cashfchequefBACS? (if not explain) Yes No Wages paid by cash Youngest worker found: 20 years 6 months Workers under 18 subject to hazardous work assignments? Yes No Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 6 of 19 Were workers aware of the audit? Yes No
Which time keeping system is used? Time cards Swipe cards Nanual Other: !f applicable, name of union and union representative: NfA
!f no union what is parallel means of consultation with workers?
Works Committee meetings Was the union's or workers' representative involved in the audit? (if no, explain) Yes No
The percentage of workers at the site covered by collective bargaining with one or more recognised trade unions NfA The percentage of workers at the site covered by negotiation with workers' representatives who are NOT members of one or more recognised trade unions NfA Were workers aware of the code? Yes No Audit results reviewed with facility management? Yes No Were union reps. or workers' reps. present at opening and closing meeting? Opening Yes No Closing Yes No
Audit Results by Clause
1: Employment is Freely Chosen ETI 1.1 There is no forced, bonded or involuntary prison labour. 1.2 Workers are not required to lodge "deposits" or their identity papers with their employer and are free to leave their employer after reasonable notice.
Non-compliance: Nothing to report
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Personal files of 26 workers (randomly selected) were verified. Files were documented with Worker's Job application, Appointment letter, Personal details and Age proof documents. Workers were free to leave at the end of their shift and the job after 30 days notice. Nanagement withholds no original document or deposit amount.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 7 of 19
2: Freedom Of Association & Right To Collective Bargaining Are Respected: ETI 2.1 Workers, without distinction, have the right to join or form trade unions of their own choosing and to bargain collectively. 2.2 The employer adopts an open attitude towards the activities of trade unions and their organisational activities. 2.3 Workers' representatives are not discriminated against and have access to carry out their representative functions in the workplace. 2.+ Where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining is restricted under law, the employer facilitates, and does not hinder, the development of parallel means for independent and free association and bargaining.
Non-compliance: Nothing to report
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) No workers union existed in the factory. But factory has formed (alternatefparallel means) different works committees like workers, sexual harassment, grievances, safety and canteen committees with employees as member of committees. These committees meet once in two month f or monthly and are actively involved to identify and solve the issues. !f any. Workers are free to express their views with the management either directly or through the suggestion boxes fixed at factory. This was cross-verified through minutes of the committee meetings, worker and management interview.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
3: Working Conditions are Safe & Hygienic
ETI 3.1 A safe and hygienic working environment shall be provided, bearing in mind the prevailing knowledge of the industry and of any specific hazards. Adequate steps shall be taken to prevent accidents and injury to health arising out of, associated with, or occurring in the course of work, by minimising, so far as is reasonably practicable, the causes of hazards inherent in the working environment. 3.2 Workers shall receive regular and recorded health 8 safety training, and such training shall be repeated for new or reassigned workers. 3.3 Access to clean toilet facilities and to potable water, and, if appropriate, sanitary facilities for food storage shall be provided. 3.+ Accommodation, where provided, shall be clean, safe, and meet the basic needs of the workers. 3.5 The company observing the code shall assign responsibility for health 8 safety to a senior management representative.
Non-compliance:
Description of non-compliance 1: No safety guards such as needle guards to 6 single sewing machines, pulley guards to 7 sewing machines and 2 Genset motor were provided. Local law: According to Rule 53 schedule 1 of 3{3) of The Tamil Nadu Factories Rules 1950, -All Belts, Pulley, Gears, Chains, Sprocket wheels, and other dangerous moving parts of machinery which either form part of the machinery or are used in association with it, shall be securely guarded. Recommended corrective action: The factory shall provide necessary safety guards to all the machines and equipments as per local law. Objective evidence observed: During the factory tour, it was observed that needle guards were not provided to 6 single needle machines, pulley guards were not provided to 7 sewing machines and 2 motor fan of Genset. Nanagement was receptive of the issue Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 8 of 19 and assured to take immediate corrective action.
Description of non-compliance 2: Detailed medical examination has not been done for 3 canteen workers employed through contract. Local law or ETI requirement: According to Section 67 {A) of The Tamil Nadu Factories Rules, 1950, Every member of the canteen staff who handles foodstuffs shall be medically examined by the Factory Nedical Officer or the certifying surgeon and such examination shall include the following namely,- (i) Routine and bacteriological testing of faeces and urine for germs of dysentery and typhoid fever at intervals of not more than six months. (ii) Routine blood examination at intervals of not more than twelve months. (iii) Any other examination including chest X rays that may be considered necessary by the Factory Nedical Officer or the Certifying Surgeon. Any person, who in the opinion of the Factory Nedical Officer as confirmed in writing by the Certifying Surgeon, is unsuitable for employment on account of possible risk to the health of others, shall not be employed as canteen staff. Recommended corrective action: Factory shall ensure that detailed medical examination, including the routine and bacteriological testing of faeces and urine for germs of dysentery and typhoid fever, routine blood examination and other examination including chest X rays to be done for the 3 canteen workers as per law requirement. Objective evidence observed: During the documentfrecord review and interview with the management, it was observed that 3 canteen workers have not been medically examined (with all the necessary tests). However the fitness certificate has been obtained from a medical practitioner for these 3 workers. Nanagement accepted the finding and assured to take corrective action immediately.
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Factory has drafted/displayed the health and safety policy and formed health and safety committee to take care of health & safety issues of the workers. Fire Safety, First aid activities (including training) are followed as per the legal requirements and the records are maintained/ updated periodically. Factory has given appropriate PPEs to the workers, wherever required. No hazardous process/materials observed in side the factory.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
4: Child Labour Shall Not Be Used ETI +.1 There shall be no new recruitment of child labour. +.2 Companies shall develop or participate in and contribute to policies and programmes which provide for the transition of any child found to be performing child labour to enable her or him to attend and remain in quality education until no longer a child. +.3 Children and young persons under 18 shall not be employed at night or in hazardous conditions. +.+ These policies and procedures shall conform to the provisions of the relevant !LO Standards.
Non-compliance: Nothing to report
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 9 of 19 Factory has not employed any workers less than the age of 18 years. Factory has framedfdisplayedfcommunicated Child labor policy throughout the organization. As per the policy the factory shall not employ the workers less than the age of 18 years. Before the appointment of a worker, the factory verifies the age proof documents and retains copies on appointment. Auditors verified 26 workers personal files all of them were documented with valid doctor's certificate.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
5: Living Wages Are Paid ETI 5.1 Wages and benefits paid for a standard working week meet, at a minimum, national legal standards or industry benchmark standards, whichever is higher. !n any event wages should always be enough to meet basic needs and to provide some discretionary income. 5.2 All workers shall be provided with written and understandable information about their employment conditions in respect to wages before they enter employment and about the particulars of their wages for the pay period concerned each time that they are paid. 5.3 Deductions from wages as a disciplinary measure shall not be permitted nor shall any deductions from wages not provided for by national law be permitted without the expressed permission of the worker concerned. All disciplinary measures should be recorded.
Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 10 of 19 Wages analysis Sample size (number of wages checked and which weeks or months): 26 ( + from April 2007, 2 each from march, April, may, June, July, August, September, October, November, December 2006, Jan, Feb, and Narch 07 ) were reviewed in order to verify the overtime hour work performed and payment made thereafter
Legal minimum wage for standard time: INR S5.S3Jday and INR 2231.60Jmonth for Helpers (8 hoursfday and 30 fmonth) as per Zone -C Industry norm for this region: As per Zone -C wages. Legal overtime premium for weekdays: Double the rate of normal wages Legal overtime premium for rest days: Double the rate of normal wages Legal overtime premium for holidays: Thrice the rate of normal wages
For the following table please select one worker's records from each Worker Type" and populate the boxes Regular Day OT Rest Day OT Statutory Holiday OT Worker Type Pay Period (mmfweek) Employee Namef Staff !D#f Dept Contract Nonthlyf Daily Regular Working Hours Regular Work Pay Rate Hour Wage* Hour Wage Hour Wage Total OT Hours !ncentivesf Bonusf Allowances etc. Gross Wages Social !nsurance and Other Deductions Actual Wage Paid After Deduction Process Operator {Highest paid) April 2007 E.Ramesh/ 1106-Cutter 138. 25 3450 26 717.60 /
/
/
/ 26
/ 4167. 60 414+61 3692.60 Process Operator {Average paid) April 2007 R.Baby/366- Tailor 100 24 2400 29 580
/
/
/
/ 28
/ 2880 288+42 2070 Process Operator {Lowest paid) February 2007 C.Valarmathi/ 56- Checker 95 20.5 1947.5 14 266
/
/
/
/ 14
/ 2213. 5 234+35 1678.5 Note: Wages are in !NR- *ES! deduction not made form the overtime wages and Overtime wages paid at 160 instead of 200
Comments: Please state here any specific reasonsfcircumstances that explain the lowest and highest gross wages. As per Zone-C job category and according to worker's competencyfperformance.
1. Contracted OJT premium for ... Weekdays: Double the rate of normal wages Rest days : Double the rate of normal wages Holidays: Thrice the rate of normal wages 2. Actual OJT premium paid in sample for ... Weekdays: 160 of the rate of normal wages Rest days: NfA Holidays : NfA 3. Average wage paid to operators: !NR 105f day and !NR 2730 f month for operator.
Non-compliance:
Description of non-compliance 1: Overtime wages are not paid at double the rate of the normal wages. Local law or ETI requirement: According to Section 59 {1) of The Factories Act, 194S where a worker works in a factory for more than 9 hours in any day or more than +8 hours in any week, he shall in respect of overtime work be entitled to wages at the rate of twice his `ordinary' rate of wages. Where there is increase in working hours but the increase is below the maximum working hours, a workman is entitled to proportionate extra wages for this extra work. Recommended corrective action: The factory shall pay the overtime wages at double the normal rate of wages for all the workers as per law requirement. Objective evidence observed: Upon reviewing the workers payroll records and through employeef management interview it was observed that the workers who have worked overtime work on regular days were not paid the overtime wages at double the rate. Presently for 2 hours overtime work were paid at + hours wages, which is almost 160 instead of 200. Nanagement acknowledged the finding and assured to take corrective action as per the local law requirement immediately. Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 11 of 19 immediately.
Description of non-compliance 2: ContributionsfDeductions were not made on the overtime wages towards the Employees State !nsurance. Local law or ETI requirement: According to Section 2{22) of The Employees State Insurance Act 194S, Wages means all remuneration paid or payable in cash to an employee, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied were fulfilled and includes any payment to an employee in respect of any period of authorized leave, lock-out, strike, which is not illegal or layoff and other additional remuneration, if any, paid at intervals not exceeding two months, but does not include- a) any contribution paid by the employer to any pension fund or provident fund or under this Act; b) any traveling allowance or the value of any traveling concession; c) any sum paid to the person employed to defray special expenses entailed on him by the nature of his employment ; or d) Any gratuity payable on discharge Recommended corrective action: The factory shall ensure to make contributionsfdeductions for overtime wages paid to the workers towards the Employees State !nsurance Scheme. Objective evidence observed: During payroll review, workers interview and as observed that the factory has worked overtime work in Production sections. Factory has paid 160 of the regular wages for such work. But the factory has not made any ES! contributionsfdeductions for the there after. Nanagement acknowledged the same and assured to take immediate corrective action.
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) 26 payroll records were verified. Workers are paid wages as per the legal minimum wagesfagreement and they are covered under the medical and social benefits of Employee State !nsurance and Provident Fund. All the relevant documentsfrecords were available to verify these benefits made.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
6: Working Hours Are Not Excessive: ETI 6.1 Working hours comply with national laws and benchmark industry standards, whichever affords greater protection. 6.2 !n any event, workers shall not on a regular basis be required to work in excess of +8 hours per week and shall be provided with at least one day off for every seven-day period on average. Overtime shall be voluntary, shall not exceed 12 hours per week, shall not be demanded on a regular basis and shall always be compensated at a premium rate.
Working hours analysis
Sample size checked {number of workers): (+ from April 2007, 2 each from march, April, may, June, July, August, September, October, November, December 2006, Jan, Feb, and Narch 07 ) were reviewed in order to verify the overtime hour work performed
Legal standard work-week {hours): +8 + 12 hours
1. Contracted standard work-week this factory {hrs) 4S as per the production Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 12 of 19 appointment 2. Actual standard work-week averaged over sample {hrs) 4S 3. Lowest basic hours worked 40 4. Highest basic hours worked 4S
Legal permitted overtime hours: 2 hoursJday; 12 hoursJweek and 50 hoursJquarter Any local waivers for this factory: Nil
Comments: Please state here any specific reasonsfcircumstances that explain the highest working hours. To meet the committed delivery date and shipment urgency
1. Actual overtime hours {averaged over sample) 2 hoursfday; 15 hoursfweek 8 29 hoursf month 2. Range of overtime hours over all operators {quote highest and lowest) 0-2 hoursfday; 7 -15 hoursf week 8 7.5 - 29 hoursf month 3. Peak seasons Evenly distributed throughout the year
Non-compliance: Description of non-compliance 1: Overtime hours worked by the workers exceed the legal limits of 2 hoursfday, 12 hoursfweek and 50 hoursfquarter. Local law or ETI requirement: According to Section 64{4) of the Factories Act 194S, !n making rules under this section, the State Government shall not exceed, except is respect of exemption under clause (a) of sub-section (2) the following limits of work inclusive of overtime- (i) The total number of hours of work in any day shall not exceed ten, (ii) The spread over, inclusive of intervals for rest, shall not exceed twelve hours in any one day, (iii) The total numbers of hours in a week, including overtime, shall not exceed sixty, (iv) The total numbers of hours of overtime shall not exceed fifty for any one quarter. Note: Quarter" means a period of three consecutive months beginning on the 1 st January, the 1 st April, the 1 st July or the 1 st October. Recommended corrective action: Factory shall ensure to carry out the overtime hours within the legal requirements as specified in the law. Objective evidence observed: Upon reviewing the payroll and attendance records, it was observed that the workers in production sections are working more than the legally prescribed overtime hours per day, week and quarter. The maximum overtime hours worked by the workers is 2 hoursfday, 15 hoursfweek, 29 hoursfmonth (April 2007) and 70 hours fquarter (January-Narch 2007). However the securities are working in three shifts and 8-hoursfshift bases and no overtime is carried out. This was also confirmed with the workers through interview. Nanagement acknowledged the finding and assured to take corrective action as per the local law.
Description of non-compliance 2: Factory did not obtain the approval from the concerned authority for the employment of women workers after 7pm for overtime hours. Local law or ETI requirement: According to Section 66 of The Factories Act, 194S, {1) {b) no woman shall be (required or allowed to work in any factory) except between the hours of 6.00am and 7.00pm. Recommended corrective action: The factory shall obtain the approval to employ women workers after 7 pm for the overtime work as per law. Objective evidence observed: During review of the documents and workerf management interview, it was observed that women workers in the production section are employed after 7.00pm for overtime work (from 6.00 to 8.30pm). But the factory did not obtain Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 13 of 19 approval from the concerned authority for the employment of women workers after 7pm. However the factory takes care of the safety of the women workers back home. The management has accepted the finding and has assured to make corrective actions accordingly.
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) 26 time records were verified. Factory has manual time card system to record the in 8 out time. As per these records, the overtime work hours done by the workers exceed the legal limits of 2 hoursfday, 12 hoursfweek and 50 hoursfquarter. Workers and the Securities are provided with weekly off regularly. These were corroborated with production records, notice on working hours displayed at notice board and workers interview.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
7: No Discrimination Is Practised ETI 7.1 There is no discrimination in hiring, compensation, access to training, promotion, termination or retirement based on race, caste, national origin, religion, age, disability, gender, marital status, sexual orientation, union membership or political affiliation.
Non-compliance: Nothing to report
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Workers are provided employment and remuneration based on their competency and job requirements and also promotion 8 training opportunity is based on the workers willingness and competency. The factory has policy and procedures on non-discrimination, which has been communicated to the workers. As per the workers interview there were no practice of discrimination found in the factory.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
S: Regular Employment Is Provided ETI 8.1 To every extent possible work performed must be on the basis of recognised employment relationship established through national law and practice. 8.2 Obligations to employees under labour or social security laws and regulations arising from the regular employment relationship shall not be avoided through the use of labour- only contracting, sub-contracting, or homeworking arrangements, or through apprenticeship schemes where there is no real intent to impart skills or provide regular employment, nor shall any such obligations be avoided through the excessive use of fixed-term contracts of employment.
Non-compliance: Nothing to report
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 1+ of 19 Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Workers are given continuous employment. Workers employment contracts were reviewed and the terms 8 conditions were found as per law. Nore over as per the employee interviews, the workers are provided with regular work and they were aware of legal wages and no issues were reported so far.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
9: No Harsh Or Inhumane Treatment Is Allowed ET! 9.1 Physical abuse or discipline, the threat of physical abuse, sexual or other harassment and verbal abuse or other forms of intimidation be prohibited. Non-compliance: Nothing to report
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Factory has formed workers and grievance committee. The records related to the formation of the committeesf activities of the committees were verified and found these committees are actively involved in the day-to-day affairs of the factory. As per the observation and employee interviews no inhuman treatment is practiced in the factory.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
A: Entitlement to Work & Immigration Additional Retailer Specific Elements A1 Only workers with a legal right to work shall be employed or used by the supplier. A2 All workers including employment agency staff, must be validated by the supplier for their legal right to work by reviewing original documentation. A3 Employment agencies must only supply workers registered with them. A+ The supplier shall implement processes to enable adequate control over agencies with regards the above points and related legislation.
Non-compliance: Nothing to report
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Factory has directly employed all the workers in production sections and has employed securities through `Globe Detective Agencies' on contract basis as per the legal regulations. Workers are provided with appointment letters and ensured that all the workers were above the legal minimum ages and the terms 8 conditions of contracts were as per laws.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 15 of 19 B: Code and System Implementation: Retailer Specific Additional Elements B1 Suppliers are expected to implement and maintain systems for delivering compliance to this Code. B2 Suppliers shall appoint a senior member of management who shall be responsible for compliance with the Code. B3 Suppliers are expected to communicate this Code to all employees and to their suppliers. B4 Suppliers should, where reasonably practicable extend the principles of this Ethical Code through their supply chain.
Non-compliance: Description of non-compliance 1: Factory did not issue leave book for the reference to individual workers. Local law or ETI requirement: According to the Rules SS of the Tamil Nadu Factories Rules 1950, (1) The manager shall provide each worker who has become entitled to leave during a calendar year, with a book in form no 15 (hereafter called the leave book) not later than the 31 st January of that year. The leave book shall be the property of the worker, and the manager or his agent shall not demand it except to make entries and shall not keep it for more than one week at a time. Recommended corrective action: The factory shall ensure to issue the Leave Book for individual workers in the prescribed formats as per law. Objective evidence observed: During the review of the documentsfrecords, it was observed that the factory has not issued any leave book for the reference of individual workers. However the workers are provided with encashment of leave during the first month of calendar year and the leave with wages register is also maintained. This was confirmed with workers through interview. Nanagement accepted the finding and assured to take corrective action immediately.
Description of non-compliance 2: Renewed factory license was not obtained as the present factory license expired on December 31, 2006. Local law or ETI requirement: According to Rule 6 of the Tamil Nadu Factories Rules 1950, (1) The limits specified in the license granted to a factory in regard to horse power or the number of persons employed shall not be altered or the name of the factory changed unless the license has been amended by the [Deputy chief !nspector of Factories| having jurisdiction over the area where the factory is situated. Recommended corrective action: Factory shall ensure to obtain the renewed factory license as per law. Objective evidence observed: During review of the documents and management interview, it was observed that the present factory license expired on December 31,2006 and the renewed license was not available though the factory had applied for renewal on February 06,2007. Nanagement accepted the finding and assured to take corrective action immediately.
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Standing order, Fire license. etc., are documented and updated. !t was verified and found these documents are with in the validity period during the audit.
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
C: Sub- Contracting & Home-working: C1 There should be no sub-contracting unless previously agreed with the main client. C2 Home-working should be properly managed.
Note to auditor on home-working: Report on whether it is direct or via agents. How many workers, relationship with factory and what control systems are in place.
Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 16 of 19
Summary of sub-contracting andJor homeworking.
1. Number of sub-contractorsJagents used 2 2. Number of homeworkers Total: NJA Male:NJA Female:NJA 3. Is there a facility policy on sub-contracting? No (Under drafting) 4. Is there a facility policy on homeworking? NfA 5. What checks are in place to ensure no child labour is being used and work is safe? No checks performed 6. How does facility ensure worker hours and pay meet local laws for homeworkers? NfA 7. What processes are sub-contracted? Printing 8 Embroidery S. What processes are carried out by homeworkers? NfA 9. Are written agreements in place for homeworkers that include regular employment? NfA
Non-compliance: No non compliant issues found
Potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Factory doesn't subcontractfout source any of the production processes as all the processes are carried out internally. But factory is outsourcing Printing and Embroidery processes from outside suppliers. Factory is in the process of drafting and implementation of Supplier control procedures presently as the factory is going for WRAP certification in next month. Subcontractor Details: Printing: Nithunram Tex, Dharapuram Road, Tirupur, (Contact-Nr.Raaju) Embroidery: Tiptop Embroidery, Palladam Road, Tirupur, (Contact-Nr.Jagan)
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
Additional Requirements
D: Environmental
D1 Suppliers shall seek to make continuous improvements in their environmental performance and, as a minimum, comply with the requirements of local and international laws and regulations. D2 The supplier shall be aware of and comply with their end clients' environmental requirements.
Non-compliance: Description of non-compliance 1: Consent for operationf NOC for air and water were not renewed by the factory. Local law or ETI requirement: According to Section 24& 25 of the Water {Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, No person shall, without the previous consent of the State Board establish or take any steps to establish any industry, operation or process, or any treatment and disposal system or any extension or addition thereto, which is likely to discharge, sewage or trade effluent into a stream or well or sewer of on land. According to Section 21 of the Air {Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 19S1, Restrictions on use of certain industrial plants. - [(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, no person shall, without the previous consent of the State Board, establish or operate any industrial plant in an air pollution control area. Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 17 of 19 Recommended corrective action: Factory shall ensure to obtain the renewed consents for Air and Water from Local Pollution Control Board as per the local law. Objective evidence observed: Upon reviewing the records, it was observed that the factory has not renewed the consent order for Air and Water and the present consents expired on Narch 31,2007. How ever the factory has applied for the renewal on April 0+,2007. Nanagement agreed to take corrective action immediately.
Other potential issues: Nothing to report
Current status: (!f there are no non-compliances then please summarise the systems that the factory has in place to meet this requirement) Nothing to report
Best practices observed: Nothing to report
Worker Interview Summary
Total N of group interviews + [1 Nale 8 3 Female groups|
Total N of individual interviews N2 F+ Total N of interviewed workers (maleffemale) N7 F19 !nterviews were done in private and the confidentiality of the interview process was communicated to the workers? Yes No !n general, what was the attitude of the workers towards their workplace? Favourable Non-favourable !ndifferent What was the most common worker complaint? Nil What did the workers like the most about working at this facility? Good working environment and timely disbursement of wages
Any additional comment(s) regarding interviews: Nil
Local Law
Legal work-week (total hours): Total 60 hours - +8 Regular hours in a week as per section 51 and 12 Overtime hours per week as per Section 6+(+) of The Factories Act, 19+8 Legal maximum allowed overtime hours (per day, week, month): 2 hours f day, 12 hours f week and 50 hours per Quarter as per Section 6+(+) of the Factories Act, 19+8 Legal minimum work age: Above 1+ Years for Restricted work and Above 18 years for unrestricted work Legal minimum wage(s): !NR 85.83f day and !NR 2231.60 f Nonth for Helpers category in Zone-C Legal overtime wage(s): Twice the normal rate of wages as per section 59 of The Factories Act, 19+8.
Agency Workers (Workers sourced from a local agent who are not directly paid by the factory) Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 18 of 19
Number of agencies used (average) One - `Globe Detective Agency (for security guards) Were agency workers' agefpayfhours included within scope of this audit Yes No
Community Benefits (Please list below any specific community benefits that the factory management stated that they were involved in, e.g. H!v programme, education, sports facilities) Factory has provided health and safety awareness programmes to the workers.
Audit Body: Bureau Veritas CPS Report Ref: 10070710155 Date: May 22,2007 Sedex Nembers Ethical Trade Audit Report v1 01_07_2006.doc Page 19 of 19
Photo Form
Factory Exterior view Factory Exterior view Factory Name Board
Finishing section Canteen 8 Dining hall Creche
Sewing machines without Pulley guards Sewing machines without needle guards Genset motor without Pulley guards
Camden Industries Company, Inc. v. Carpenters Local Union No. 1688, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, 353 F.2d 178, 1st Cir. (1965)