5 - YEAR DROPOUT RATE PER YEAR LEVEL 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 I 0 0 8 23 22 II 0 9 15 31 III 0 13 17 23 IV 0 3 12 13 Number of Beneficiaries (Total number served since the intervention was started) 65 students number of SARDO's actually served: 65 Students Budget 28,770.00 Source of Fund SBM 2012 III.
5 - YEAR DROPOUT RATE PER YEAR LEVEL 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 I 0 0 8 23 22 II 0 9 15 31 III 0 13 17 23 IV 0 3 12 13 Number of Beneficiaries (Total number served since the intervention was started) 65 students number of SARDO's actually served: 65 Students Budget 28,770.00 Source of Fund SBM 2012 III.
5 - YEAR DROPOUT RATE PER YEAR LEVEL 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 I 0 0 8 23 22 II 0 9 15 31 III 0 13 17 23 IV 0 3 12 13 Number of Beneficiaries (Total number served since the intervention was started) 65 students number of SARDO's actually served: 65 Students Budget 28,770.00 Source of Fund SBM 2012 III.
ENRIQUETA MONTILLA DE ESTEBAN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL Pulupandan, Negros Occidental
I. 5 YEAR DROPOUT RATE PER YEAR LEVEL 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 I 0 0 8 23 22 II 0 0 9 15 31 III 0 0 13 17 23 IV 0 0 3 12 13 TOTAL 0 0 33 67 46 % 0% 0% 5.5% 2.5% 3.42%
II. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION Intervention Title: BRIDGING GAPS; A TRANSITION TO A BETTER EMEMHS Cause/s of Dropping Out Addressed Poverty, Engagement to Part-time/Full time jobs, Early Pregnancy, Health Problems, Dysfunctional Family & Indifference of Parents to Education Duration (Since when was the interventions implemented? S.Y 2012-2013. S.Y. 2013-2014 Number of Beneficiaries (Total number served since the intervention was started) 65 students Number of SARDOs actually served: 65 Students Budget 28,770.00 Source of Fund SBM 2012
III. Brief Description of Interventions As part of Enriqueta Montilla De Esteban Memorial High School Dropout Reduction Program, we have intensified our E-Tracking or Attendance Monitoring. Every section has it own class monitors to consistently check the attendance. The use of PROJECT EASE Modules for Alternative Delivery mode of instruction to reduce or eliminate dropouts was used as one of the major intervention implemented by the school. In school ALS Instructional Manager have helped in the reduction of SARDOs due to regular contact of the clientele and follow up through home visitation. IV. Highlights of the Results of Interventions Zero percent (0%) dropout achieved. Factors of prevalence absence were identified and necessary interventions were given. Those students who were engaged to part-time and full time jobs, those with health problems were enrolled to Alternative Delivery Mode of Education. Agreements were made and improved in attendance of students were achieved. Promotion rate increased from 98% to 100% Completion rate increased from 76% to 96% Retention rate increased from 93% to 98% Graduation rate has been maintained to 98%
V. Factors Critical to the Success of the Implementation of the Interventions Advocacy with the parents and stakeholders. Full cooperation and involvement of the parents and the timely assessment of class advisers Positive attitude and commitment of Teachers and parents Partnership with stakeholders. E-Tracking mechanisms. Constant engagement with the SARDOS VI. Implementation Challenges Schedules and assignment of teachers who will handle the intervention. Time Constraints to conduct home visitation due to other duties and responsibilities. Perception of students and parents to the Alternative Delivery Mode of Instruction (ADM) Indifferent attitudes of some parents. Prepared by: MARILYN N. GALVEZ Principal III