Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fight against terrorism is one of the greatest challenges the Union is facing today. The challenge
lies in the complex nature of this phenomenon. Hence, if the EU wanted to be successful in
fighting terrorism, it needed a strategic document which would reflect the comprehensive nature
of EUs response to terrorism.
"This page of the Sub-section related to the European fight against terrorism gives a general
presentation in two parts:
Part I covers the latest developments which occurred within the recent years.
Part II gives a general view of the accomplishments and the acuis at European level of the
matter concerned."
I Latest Developments
n !ecember "##$ the %ustice and Home &ffairs 'ouncil adopted the European Union
Counter-Terrorism Strategy. ()!F File *+, -./ The 0trategy was also welcomed by the
Heads of 0tates and 1overnments on *$ and *2 !ecember "##$. The aim of the document is to
ta3e the agenda of wor3 set out at the 4arch "##5 European 'ouncil in the wa3e of the 4adrid
bombings constituting the EU &ction )lan on Terrorism ()!F File "## -./ into the next
phase.
The 0trategy commits the European Union to combat terrorism globally while respecting human
rights! and to ma"e Europe safer! allowing its citi#ens to live in an area of freedom! security and
$ustice. t ma3es clear that terrorism is a threat to all 0tates and to all peoples. Terrorism is
considered to be a criminal and un6ustifiable act under any circumstances.
n order to be successful in reducing threat posed by terrorism and EUs vulnerability to attac3,
the 0trategy re7uires wor3 at national, European and international levels. The 0trategy is divided
into the four pillars 8 Prevent, Protect, Pursue and Respond. &ctions covered by each pillar
cut across policy areas.
<hough the 0trategy suggests that 4ember 0tates have the primary responsibility for
combating terrorism, the EU adds value y!
0trengthening national capabilities9
Facilitating European cooperation9
!eveloping collective capability9and
)romoting international partnership.
&s a community based on democratic values and principles, the EU has to pursue its goals in a
democratic and accountable way. The European Council "ill revie" progress on the Strategy
once every si# months$ Every six months before this review process the %igh-level political
dialogue on counter-terrorism will ta3e place. This dialogue will bring together the 'ouncil,
the European 'ommission and the European )arliament to consider progress and to promote
transparency and balance in the EUs approach.
II &eneral Conte#t
'our pillars o( the Strategy ) Prevent, Protect, Pursue and Respond
Prevent
Under this heading the EU aims to prevent people turning to terrorism by tac"ling the factors or
root causes which can lead to radicalisation and recruitment! both in Europe and
internationally.
-ey priorities:
!evelop common approaches to spot and tac3le problematic behaviour, in particular the
misuse of the internet9
&ddress incitement and recruitment in 3ey environments (for example prisons and places
of religious training or worship/ notably by introducing new criminal offences covering
such behaviour9
!evelop a media and communication strategy to explain EU policies more effectively9
)romote good governance, democracy, education and economic prosperity through
'ommunity and 4ember 0tate assistance programmes9
!evelop inter;cultural dialogue within the Union and outside it9
!evelop a non;emotive lexicon for discussing the issues9 and
To further develop our understanding of the issues and policy responses through
continued research and the sharing of experience and analysis.
Protect
)rotection of citi<ens and infrastructures is essential. n its actions the EU see3s to reduce our
vulnerability to attac"! through improved security of borders! transport and critical
infrastructure.
-ey priorities:
mprove the secure nature of EU passports through the introduction of biometrics9
Establish the =isa nformation 0ystem (=0/ and the second generation 0chengen
nformation 0ystem (00/9
!evelop effective ris3 analysis of the EUs external border through Frontex9
mplement agreed common standards on civil aviation, port and maritime security9
&gree a European programme for critical infrastructure protection9 and
4a3e best use of EU and 'ommunity level research activity.
Pursue
The ob6ective of the Union is to pursue and investigate terrorists both within the EU and
globally. t is crucial to impede terrorist planning! travel! and communications. Terrorist
networ3s should also be disrupted by cutting off the supply of both financial finding and
operational materials. %ore generally! the aim is to bring terrorists to $ustice.
-ey priorities:
0trengthen national capabilities to combat terrorism, in light of the recommendations of
the peer evaluation of national anti;terrorism arrangements9
4a3e full use of Europol, Euro6ust and the %oint 0ituation 'entre9
Further develop mutual recognition of 6udicial decisions, including by adopting the
European Evidence >arrant9
Ensure full implementation and evaluation of existing legislation as well as the
ratification of relevant international Treaties and 'onventions9
!evelop the principle of availability in the exchange of law enforcement information
between 4ember 0tates9
Tac3le terrorist access to weapons and explosives, ranging from components for home;
made explosives to '.?@ materials9
Tac3le terrorist financing, by implementing agreed legislation, wor3ing to prevent the
abuse of the non;profit sector, and reviewing the EUs overall performance in this area9
and
)rovide technical assistance to priority third countries in order to enhance their own
counter;terrorism capabilities.
Respond
>hen )revention, )rotection and ?esponse fail, we have to be prepared, in the spirit of
solidarity! to manage and minimise the conseuences of a terrorist attac". This can be done by
improving capabilities to deal with the aftermath! the co-ordination of response and the needs of
victims.
-ey priorities:
&gree EU 'risis 'o;ordination &rrangements and supporting operational procedures9
?evise the legislation on the 'ommunity 4echanism for civil protection9
!evelop ris3 assessment as a tool to help inform the building of capabilities to respond to
an attac39
mprove co;ordination with international organisations on managing responses to terrorist
attac3s and other disasters9 and
0hare best practice, and develop approaches for, the provision of assistance to victims of
terrorism and their families.
Strategies for Countering Terrorism:
Lessons from the Israeli Experience
1
Jonathan B. Tucker
March 2003
Jonathan B. Tucker, Ph.D., is a policy analyst specializing in chemical
and biological weapons proliferation and control. He is a 200203 senior
fellow at the .!. "nstit#te of Peace in $ashington, D%, on lea&e from
the Monterey "nstit#te's %enter for (onproliferation !t#dies. )efore
*oining the center in +,,-, he ser&ed for si. years in .!. go&ernment
positions at the Department of !tate, the %ongressional /ffice of
0echnology 1ssessment, and the 1rms %ontrol and Disarmament
1gency. "n +,,2, he was a ( biological weapons inspector in "ra3. He
holds a ).!. in biology from 4ale and a Ph.D. in political science from the
Massach#setts "nstit#te of 0echnology. "n addition to n#mero#s papers
and reports, he is the a#thor of Scourge: The Once and Future Threat of Smallpox and the
editor of Toxic Terror: Assessing Terrorist Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons.
Introduction
Eer since its founding in !"#$% the state of &srael has faced the threat of terror attac's
from re(ectionist organi)ations such as the *opular Front for the +i,eration of *alestine%
-amas% *alestinian &slamic .ihad% and -i),ollah.