Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Core
TM
2 Quad Processors with a clock speed of 2.3GHz and 2 GB
RAM
Software modules ARTEMiS
Number of CPUs 3
Time Step 50 microseconds
CPU3: Tc = 17 s
CPU1:
Tc = 30 s
CPU3: Tc = 16 s
Image adapted from:
S.A. Zidi, S. Hadjeri, M. K. Fellah, "The performance analysis
of an HVDC link", Electronic Journal <Technical Acoustics>,
November 2004
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
53
AD-GRID-16: First CIGRE Benchmark for HVDC control studies
Keywords: HVDC simulation, FACTS simulation, 12-pulse thyristor converters, weak AC
systems
This demo models the first CIGRE benchmark for HVDC link protection studies rated at 1000 MW
with a DC voltage of 500 kV and a DC current of 2 kA. The monopolar DC-link is modeled as a
back-to-back link with a smoothing reactor on each side and a capacitor in the middle. Tap
changers are not simulated and fixed taps are assumed. Both AC systems are modeled with a
short-circuit ratio (SCR) of 2.5, which is considered as a weak AC system. This condition makes
the AC systems voltage stability harder and thus, the HVDC controls more difficult because they
are bound to operate near the stability margin. The benchmark is also defined in a way that
creates composite resonances between the AC and the DC system, also creating tough
conditions for HVDC controls. Two circuit breakers are used to apply faults on the inverter AC
side and the rectifier DC side.
System Configuration
Hardware enclosure Dual Intel
Core
TM
2 Quad Processors with a clock speed of 2.3GHz and 2 GB
RAM
Software modules ARTEMiS
Number of CPUs 1
Time Step 50 microseconds
Image taken from :
M. Szechtman, T. Wess, C.V. Thio, "First Benchmark Model
for HVDC Control Studies", Electra, No. 135, April 1991.
345kV,50Hz
CIGRE Benchmark equivalent network
CIGRE
Inverter
Filters
CIGRE
Rectifier
Filters
230kV,50Hz
CIGRE Benchmark equivalent network
12 pulse
thyristor
rectifier
12 pulse
thyristor
inverter
Rectifier
controls &
protection
Inverter
controls &
protection
1 CPU: Tc = 29 s
Image taken from:
M. Szechtman, T. Wess, C. V. Thio, "First Benchmark Model for
HVDC Control Studies", Electra, No. 135, April 1991
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
54
AD-GRID-17: Multi-terminal HVDC System
Keywords: HVDC simulation, 12-pulse thyristor rectifier, FACTS simulation
This demo models a multi-terminal HVDC system. It includes eight 12-pulse valve groups with
converter transformers, smoothing reactors and generic controls. There are three HVDC
converter stations. One station has four 12-pulse valve groups (two bi-polar in parallel), and the
other two stations have 2 12-pulse valve groups (one bi-polar) each. In each station, there are 15
3-phase AC filter sub-banks on the AC side and eight branches of filter banks on the DC sides
(four at positive pole and four at negative pole) with breakers. The AC filter sub-banks are tuned
to filter harmonics of 11
th
, 13
th
, and above 24
th
, and gives 15 tiers of VAR compensation. In each
station, there are two simplified SVCs (Static Var Compensator), six synchronous generators
along with their controls, and a grid source (represented by ideal source via an impedance), are
connected to the AC systems.
System Configuration
Hardware enclosure Dual IntelCoreTM 2 Quad Processors with a clock speed of 2.3GHz and 2 GB
RAM
Software modules ARTEMiS
Number of CPUs 7
Time Step 50 microseconds and 100us for controller
Line (300km)
Line (300km)
0.5H smoothing
reactor
0.5H smoothing
reactor
0.5H
smoothing
reactor
0.5H smoothing
reactor
0.5H smoothing
reactor
Line (300km)
Line (300km)
A
C
F
i
l
t
e
r
(
3
0
0
M
V
a
r
)
A
C
F
i
l
t
e
r
(
3
0
0
M
V
a
r
)
SVC Group
& Controls
SVC Group
& Controls
A
C
F
i
l
t
e
r
(
3
0
0
M
V
a
r
)
HVDC Controls
& Protections
0.5H smoothing
reactor
Generator
group
Generator
group
Generator
group
12 pulse
thyristor
inverter
12 pulse
thyristor
rectifier
12 pulse
thyristor
rectifier
12 pulse
thyristor
rectifier
CPU5: Tc = 35 s
CPU6: Tc = 35 s
CPU7: Tc = 22 s
CPU4: Tc = 40 s
CPU2: Tc = 40 s
CPU3: Tc = 40 s
CPU1: Tc = 20 s
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
55
AD-GRID-18: Train-traction model
Keywords: 2-level Inverter, DC-Link Fault, deadtime
This demo models a Train Traction Drive System, with two separate identical DC systems. To
achieve hard-real-time simulation the rectifier and inverter were modeled with RT-EVENTS Time-
Stamped Bridges and ARTEMiS. The VSC-based 2-arm rectifiers providing the DC voltage (1500
V rating) to each link are AC-fed by a single-phase Catenary Panto rated 25 kV, 50 Hz, through a
double secondary traction transducer. The two DC links are parallel connected through diodes, to
a simple RL load. Each DC-link has a filter tuned at 100 Hz (2
nd
harmonic). The drive systems
(one on each DC-link) consist in two (2) sets of two (2) asynchronous motors, with each set being
fed by 3-arm IGBT inverters. The asynchronous machines are star connected machines, rated
297 kW and 991 Vrms LL. The machines are speed controlled.
This model allows the study and validation of various phenomena, such as DC-Link to ground
fault, three- or single-phase fault at IGBT output, loss of the catenary as well as multiple
contingencies on the gating signals of the IGBT drives.
System Configuration
Hardware enclosure Dual IntelCoreTM 2 Quad Processors with a clock speed of 2.3GHz and 2 GB
RAM
Software modules ARTEMiS, RT-EVENTS
Number of CPUs 2
Time Step 50 microseconds
4
4
25kV
1PH,50Hz
external secondary
impedance of
Transformer
external secondary
impedance of
Transformer
100Hz
filter
100Hz
filter
ASM
ASM
ASM
ASM
Traction
Motor 1
Traction
Motor 4
Traction
Motor 3
Traction
Motor 2
6
6
Load
smoothing
inductor
smoothing
inductor
1500 VDC
Bus
1500 VDC
Bus
Control for
Inverter
Control for
Rectifier
CPU2: Tc = 18 s CPU2: Tc = 22 s
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
56
AD-GRID-19: 3-level, 72-pulse STATCOM
Keywords: Multi-level converters, Multi-pulse converters, STATCOM, FACTS
This model is a 3-level STATCOM with 72 switches for the voltage stabilization of a 77 kV bus. A
multi-pulse transformer allowing for a three-phase to 18-phases AC system is interfacing the
FACTS system to the grid. A relatively low frequency PWM switching algorithm is applied (300 Hz
carrier frequency) to reduce switching losses in the STATCOM. However, the multi-pulse
topology with six (6) 3-level bridges allows for characteristic harmonics elimination as each bridge
carrier signals are interlaced with a phase shift of 1/6 of the carrier period.
Figure 1. A simplified STATCOM schematic (72-switch).
System Configuration
Hardware enclosure Dual IntelCoreTM 2 Quad Processors with a clock speed of 2.3GHz and 2 GB
RAM
Software modules RT-EVENTS
Number of CPUs 1
Time Step 50 microseconds
Inspired from Operating
performance of the
STATCOM in the Kanzaki
substation, CIGRE 2005,
by H. Yonezawa, et al.
1 CPU: Tc = 36 s
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
57
AD-GRID-20: Thyristor Controller Series Capacitor test system
Keywords: power system compensation, FACTS, simulation, TCR, TCSC, power transfer
improvement
This demo models a Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor placed on a 500kV, long transmission
line, to improve power transfer. The TCSC consists of a fixed capacitor and a parallel Thyristor
Controlled Reactor (TCR) in each phase. When the TCSC is bypassed, the power transfer is
around 110MW. The test system is as described in [32].
The effects of operating the TCSC in capacitive, inductive or manual alpha modes can be
analyzed. The effects of varying the reference impedance on the power transfer can also be
viewed. In the capacitive mode the range for impedance can be varied from 120 to 136 Ohm.
This range corresponds to approximately 490 to 830MW power transfer range (100%-110%
compensation). When compared with the power transfer possible of 110 MW with an
uncompensated line, the TCSC enables significant improvement in power transfer level. In the
inductive and alpha modes the range for impedance can be varied from 19 to 60 Ohm to see that
the power transfer ranges varies from 100 to 85 MW.
TCSC Test System
TCSC
control
system
TCR pulses V
TCSC
I
ABC
Z
REF
Control Mode
Line
Firing Unit
AC system 2 AC system 1
TCSC
System configuration
Hardware enclosure Dual Intel Core 2 Quad Processors with a clock speed of 2.3
GHz and 2 GB RAM
Software modules ARTEMiS,
Number of CPUs 1
Time Step 50 microseconds
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
58
AD-GRID-21: 330-bus HVAC Network
Keywords: Transmission network, Transient analysis, synchronous machine, multi-target
simulation
Introduction
This model demonstrates the capability of eMEGAsim to simulate large-scale power systems in
real-time across multiple targets. A large 500 kV transmission network consisting of 330 3-phase
buses is modeled and simulated.
Model description
The power system in this model is a 500 kV 60Hz network, consisting of 330 3-phase buses, 517
transmission lines (ARTEMiS distributed parameter line model), 42 generation plants and one
swing bus, and 90 loads. Each plant is simulated as one combined synchronous machine (SM)
with turbine and governor, excitation system, and power system stabilizer, connected to grid
through a 3-phase 2-winding step-up transformer. The swing bus is simulated as an ideal voltage
source connected to the bus through equivalent impedance. In each load bus, the load is
simulated as a combined load of three-phase series RLC.
This entire system is decoupled into 18 zones and each zone is simulated on one subsystem. All
generator controllers are simulated in a separate control subsystem. In real time, the 19
subsystems are simulated on 19 CPUs across 3 eMEGAsim targets. Signals are communicated
between the targets through the use of a low-latency Dolphin PCIexpress connection.
Phenomena
This model can be used to study typical power system phenomena of steady state and
electromechanical/electromagnetic transients. Four types of fault, namely bus grounding, line
grounding, line open, and generator loss, can be applied to the system. For different faults, one-,
two-, or three-phase fault can be selected. Other phenomena, such as system stability, islanding,
and resonance, can be studied and validated with this model.
System information
Num. of CPU/Target CPU type Min. step size Software modules Package
19 / 3
2 Quad-Core
Intel Xeon 2.33GHz
51 us ARTEMiS, RT-LAB E1 Series
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
59
Figure 1. 330-Bus 500kV Network
System Diagram
2B6
3M15
3B15
3B14
3B13
3B10
3B9
3B12
3B11
2B9
2B11 2B10
2M10
2B4
2B5
2B8 2B7
2B1
2B2
2M1
2B3
3B8
1B9
3B7
3B5
3B6
1M10
1B5 1B6 1B7 1B8
1B4
1B3
1B2
1B1
1M1
3B4
3B3
3B2
3M4
3M3
3M11
1B10
1B11 1B12
1B13
1B16
2B12
1B15 1B14
2B13
2B14
2B15
2B16
3B1
3B16
PLANT
TRANSFORMER
BUS
LOAD
500KVHVAC
5B6
6B9
5B9
5B11 5B10
5M10
5B4
5B5
5B8 5B7
5B1
5B2
5M1
5B3
6B8
4B9
6B7
6B5
6B6
4M10
4B5 4B6 4B7 4B8
4B4
4B3
4B2
4B1
4M1
6B4
6B3
6B2
6M4
6M3
4B10
4B11 4B12
4B13
4B16
5B12
4B15 4B14
5B13
5B14
5B15
5B16
6B1
6B15
6B14
6B13 6B12 6B11
6M11
6B16
6B10
8B6
9M15
9B15
9B14
9B13
9B10
9B9
9B12
9B11
8B9
8B11 8B10
8M10
8B4
8B5
8B8 8B7
8B1
8B2
8M1
8B3
9B8
7B9
9B7
9B5
9B6
7M10
7B5 7B6 7B7 7B8
7B4
7B3
7B2
7B1
7M1
9B4
9B3
9B2
9M4
9M3
9M11
7B10
7B11 7B12
7B13
7B16
8B12
7B15 7B14
8B13
8B14
8B15
8B16
9B1
9B16
11B6
12B9
11B9
11B11 11B10
11M10
11B
4
11B5
11B8 11B7
11B1
11B2
11M1
11B3
12B8
10B9
12B7
12B5
12B6
10M10
10B5 10B6 10B7 10B8
10B4
10B3
10B2
10B1
10M1
12B4
12B3
12B2
12M4
12M3
10B10
10B11 10B12
10B13
10B16
11B12
10B15 10B14
11B13
11B14
11B15
11B16
12B1
12B15
12B14
12B13
12B12 12B11
12M11
12B16
12B10
14B6
15B15
15B14
15B13
15B10
15B9
15B12
15B11
14B9
14B11 14B10
14M10
14B4
14B5
14B8 14B7
14B1
14B2
14M1
14B3
15B8
13B9
15B7
15B5
15B6
13M10
13B5 13B6 13B7 13B8
13B4
13B3
13B2
13B1
13M1
15B4
15B3
15B2
15M4
15M3
15M11
13B10
13B11 13B12
13B13
13B16
14B12
13B15 13B14
14B13
14B14
14B15
14B16
15B1
15B16
17B6
18B9 17B9
17B11 17B10
17M10
17B4
17B5
17B8 17B7
17B1
17B2
17M1
17B3
18B8
16B9
18B7
18B5
18B6
16M10
16B5 16B6 16B7 16B8
16B4
16B3
16B2
16B1
16M1
18B4
18B3
18B2
18M4
18M3
16B10
16B11 16B12
16B13
16B16
17B12
16B15 16B14
17B13
17B14
17B15
17B16
18B1
18B15
18B14
18B13
18B12 18B11
18M11
18B16
18B10
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
60
AD-GRID 22: 7-Three-Phase Bus Transmission and Distribution System
This model simulates a 230-kV, 60 Hz transmission system consisting of
- 7 3-phase busses.
- 4- Lines with a fault point (7 half-lines in total).
- 2 fixed impedance loads of 40 MW each.
- 4 100-MVA hydraulic generation plant (detailed synchronous machine models with turbines and all
regulators).
- 6 transformers.
- 1 ideal source.
- 17 three-phase breakers (including 3 breakers to simulate the faults).
REAL TIME SIMULATION PERFORMANCE
This real time simulation ran on a dual-Xeon-based, 3.33 GHz and RT-LAB simulator with a time step of 25s.
The overall system was run using only one CPU core out of 12 processor cores available. The processors
allocation and Real-Time Performance are summarized in Table below.
CPUs Descriptions Components Content Model Calculation Time Minimum
time step
Acceleration
factor
CPU 1: (25 s)
SM_Transmission
(complete system of Figure 1)
15 s 22 s 70
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
61
AD-GRID 23: 6-Three-Phase Bus Transmission and Distribution System
This model simulates a 230-kV, 60 Hz transmission system consisting of
- 6 3-phase busses.
- 3- Lines with a fault point (6 half-lines in total).
- 2 100-MVA hydraulic generation plant (detailed synchronous machine models with turbines and all
regulators).
- 4 transformers.
- 1 ideal source.
- 9 three-phase breakers (including 3 breakers to simulate the faults).
REAL TIME SIMULATION PERFORMANCE
This real time simulation ran on a dual-Xeon-based, 3.33 GHz and RT-LAB simulator with a time step of 20s.
The overall system was run using only one CPU core out of 12 processor cores available. The processors
allocation and Real-Time Performance are summarized in Table below.
CPUs Descriptions Components Content Model Calculation Time Minimum
time step
Acceleration
factor
CPU 1: (20 s)
SM_Transmission
(complete system of Figure 1)
8 s 12 s 33
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
62
AD-GRID 24: 8- Bus, 2 mutually coupled transmission lines, 6-machines Transmission and
Distribution System
This model simulates a 230-kV, 60 Hz transmission system consisting of
- 8-3-phase busses.
- 2- Lines with a fault point (2* 2- lines mutually coupled).
- 5-100-MVA hydraulic generation plant (detailed synchronous machine models with turbines and all
regulators).
- 1-120-MVA hydraulic generation plant (detailed synchronous machine models with turbines and all
regulators).
- 6 - transformers.
- 7- tree-phase breakers (including 2 breakers to simulate the faults).
- 1-Three phase resistive load
REAL TIME SIMULATION PERFORMANCE
This real time simulation ran on a dual-Xeon-based, 3.33 GHz and RT-LAB simulator with a time step of 30s.
The overall system was run using only one CPU core out of 12 processor cores available. The processors
allocation and Real-Time Performance are summarized in Table below.
CPUs Descriptions Components Content Model Calculation Time Minimum
time step
Acceleration
factor
CPU 1: (30 s)
SM_Transmission
(complete system of Figure 1)
16 s 27 s 66
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
63
AD-GRID 25: 8- Bus, 6-machines Transmission and Distribution System
This model simulates a 230-kV, 60 Hz transmission system consisting of
- 8-3-phase busses.
- 3- lines with a fault point (6-half lines in total).
- 4-100-MVA hydraulic generation plant (detailed synchronous machine models with turbines and all
regulators).
- 1-120-MVA hydraulic generation plant (detailed synchronous machine models with turbines and all
regulators).
- 5 - Transformers.
- 10- tree-phase breakers (including 6 breakers to simulate the faults).
- 1-Three phase 100MW resistive load
REAL TIME SIMULATION PERFORMANCE
This real time simulation ran on a dual-Xeon-based, 3.33 GHz and RT-LAB simulator with a time step of 35s.
The overall system was run using only one CPU core out of 12 processor cores available. The processors
allocation and Real-Time Performance are summarized in Table below.
CPUs Descriptions Components Content Model Calculation Time Minimum
time step
Acceleration
factor
CPU 1: (35 s)
SM_Transmission
(complete system of Figure 1)
18 30 66
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
64
AD-GRID 26: 16- Bus, 3-machines Transmission and Distribution System
This model simulates a 230-kV, 60 Hz transmission system consisting of
- 16-3-phase busses.
- 9- Lines including one mutually coupled line and one line with a fault point.
- 3-100-MVA hydraulic generation plant (detailed synchronous machine models with turbines and all
regulators).
- 2 Ideal sources
- 4 - Transformers.
- 5- three-phase breakers (including 1 breaker to simulate the faults).
- 4-Three phase 20MW resistive load
REAL TIME SIMULATION PERFORMANCE
This real time simulation ran on a dual-Xeon-based, 3.33 GHz and RT-LAB simulator with a time step of 30s.
The overall system was run using only one CPU core out of 12 processor cores available. The processors
allocation and Real-Time Performance are summarized in Table 1.
CPUs Descriptions Components Content Model Calculation Time Minimum
time step
Acceleration
factor
CPU 1: (30 s)
SM_Transmission
(complete system of Figure 1)
20 27 51
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
65
References
[1] RT-LAB 8.1, Opal-RT Technologies inc., 1751 Richardson, bureau 2525, Montral, Qc, H3K 1G6 www.opal-rt.com
[2] S. Abourida, C. Dufour, J. Blanger, Real-Time and Hardware-In-The-Loop Simulation of Electric Drives and Power
Electronics: Process, problems and solutions, Proceedings of the International Power Electronics Conference Niigata
(IPEC-Niigata 2005), 2005
[3] C. Dufour, J. Blanger, T. Ishikawa, K. Uemura, Advances in Real-Time Simulation of Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Vehicles,
Proceedings of 21st Electric Vehicle Symposium (EVS-21), Monte Carlo, Monaco, April 2-6 2005
[4] T. Matsumoto, N. Watanabe, H. Sugiura, T. Ishikawa, Development of Fuel-Cell Hybrid Vehicle, The 18th International
Electric Vehicle Symposium, Berlin, 2001
[5] T. Ishikawa, S. Hamaguchi, T. Shimizu, T. Yano, S. Sasaki, K. Kato, M. Ando, H. Yoshida Development of Next Generation
Fuel-cell Hybrid System, Proceedings of 2004 SAE International Conference
[6] C. Dufour, T. K. Das, S. Akella,Real Time Simulation of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle, Proceedings
of the 2005 Global Powertrain Congress (GPC-05), Sept. 27-29, 2003, Ann Harbor, MI, USA.
[7] C. Dufour, S. Abourida, J. Belanger, Real-Time Simulation of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Traction Drives, Proceedings of the
2003 Global Powertrain Congress (GPC-03), Sept. 23-25, 2003, Ann Harbor, MI, USA.
[8] M. Harakawa, H. Yamasaki, T. Nagano, S. Abourida, C. Dufour and J. Blanger, Real-Time Simulation of a Complete PMSM
Drive at 10 us Time Step, Proceedings of the 2005 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC 2005) April 4-8, 2005
, Niigata, Japan.
[9] C. Dufour, L. Wei, T. A. Lipo, Real-Time Simulation of Matrix Converter Drives, Proceedings of the 11th European
Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE-2005), Dresden, Sept. 11-14, 2005
[10] C. Dufour, J. Blanger, Real-time Simulation of a 48-Pulse GTO STATCOM Compensated Power System on a Dual-Xeon PC
using RT-LAB, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Power Systems Transients (IPST-05), June 19-23, 2005,
Montral, QC, Canada.
[11] C. Dufour, J. Blanger, A Real-Time Simulator for Doubly Fed Induction Generator based Wind Turbine Applications,
Proceedings of IEEE 35th Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC 2004), Aachen, Germany, June 20-25, 2004
[12] C. Dufour, J. Blanger, Real-Time Simulation of Doubly Fed Induction Generator for Wind Turbine Applications
Proceedings of the 11th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE-PEMC 2004), Sept. 2-4 2004,
Riga, Latvia
[13] C. Dufour, S. Abourida, J. Blanger, Real-Time Simulation of Electrical Vehicle Motor Drives on a PC Cluster, Proceedings
of the 10th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE-2003), Toulouse, Sept. 2-4, 2003.
[14] M.A. Ouhrouche, N. Lchevin, S. Abourida, RT-LAB Based Real-Time Simulation of a Direct Field-Oriented Controller for
an Induction Motor, Proceedings of Electrimacs, 2002, Montreal, Canada.
[15] S. Abourida, C. Dufour, J. Blanger, G. Murere, N. Lechevin, Y. Biao, Real-time PC-based simulator of electric systems and
drives, Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2002.
[16] C. Dufour, J. Blanger, S.Abourida, Accurate Simulation of a 6-pulse Inverter with Real Time Event Compensation in
ARTEMiS, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Modeling and Simulation of Electrical Machine, Converters
and Systems, (ELECTRIMACS 2002), Montreal, Canada, August 2002
[17] C. Dufour, J. Blanger, Discrete Time Compensation of Switching Events for Accurate Real-Time Simulation of Power
Systems, Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Industrial Electronics Society Conference (IECON'01), Nov 29-Dec 2 2001, Denver,
Colorado, USA
[18] C. Dufour, J. Blanger, S.Abourida, Real-Time Simulation of Onboard Generation and Distribution Power Systems,
Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Modeling and Simulation of electrical Machine, Converters and Systems,
(ELECTRIMACS 2005), April 17-20, 2005, Hammamet, Tunisia
Opal-RT Technologies Inc. Product Information & Simulation Applications
66
[19] C.A. Rabbath, M. Abdoune, J. Belanger, Effective real-time simulations of event-based systems, Proceedings of the 2000
Winter Simulation Conference.
[20] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, McGraw-Hill, 1994, Example 12.6, p. 813
[21] Klein, Rogers, Moorty and Kundur: "Analytical investigation of factors influencing PSS performance,"IEEE Trans. on EC,
Vol. 7 , No 3, September 1992
[22] C. Dufour, S. Abourida, J. Blanger,V. Lapointe, Real-Time Simulation of Permanent Magnet Motor Drive on FPGA Chip for
High-Bandwidth Controller Tests and Validation, 32nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society(IECON-
06),, Paris, France, November 7-10, 2006.
[23] C. Dufour, S. Abourida, J. Blanger,V. Lapointe, InfiniBand-Based Real-Time Simulation of HVDC, STATCOM, and SVC
Devices with Commercial-Off-The-Shelf PCs and FPGAs, 32nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society
(IECON-06), Paris, France, November 7-10, 2006
[24] S. Abourida, C. Dufour, J. Blanger, T. Yamada, T. Arasawa, Hardware-In-the-Loop Simulation of Finite-Element Based
Motor Drives with RT-LAB and JMAG, Proceedings of the EVS-22 Symposium, Yokohama, Japan, October 23-28, 2006.
[25] R. Majumber, B.C. Pal, C. Dufour, P. Korba, Design and Real-Time Implementation of Robust FACTS Controller for
Damping Inter-Area Oscillation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 809-816, May 2006.
[26] C. Dufour, Deux contributions la problmatique de la simulation numrique en temps rel des rseaux de transport
dnergie (in French), Ph.D. thesis, Laval University, Qubec, Canada, may 2000
[27] L.-F. Pak, O. Faruque, X. Nie, V. Dinavahi, A Versatile Cluster-Based Real-Time Digital Simulator for Power Engineering
Research, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 455-465, May 2006.
[28] C. Dufour, J.-N. Paquin, V. Lapointe, J. Blanger, L. Schoen, PC-Cluster-Based Real-Time Simulation of an 8 synchronous
machines network with HVDC link using RT-LAB and TestDrive, Paper accepted for the Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference on Power Systems Transients (IPST 2007), Lyon, France, June 2007.
[29] Hanmin Lee, Gildong Kim, Sehchan Oh, Gilsoo Jang, Sae-hyuk Kwon, Fault analysis of Korean electric railway system,
Electric Power Systems Research 76, pp 317 326, 2006
[30] C. Dufour, J. Blanger, S. Abourida, V. Lapointe, FPGA-Based Real-Time Simulation of Finite-Element Analysis Permanent
Magnet Synchronous Machine Drives, Proceeding of the 38th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC
07), Orlando, Florida, USA, June 17-21, 2007
[31] C. Dufour, J. Blanger, V. Lapointe, S. Abourida, Real-Time Simulation of Finite-Element Analysis Permanent Magnet
Synchronous Machine Drives on a FPGA card, Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Power Electronics and
Applications (EPE-2007), Aalborg, Danemark, Sept. 2-5, 2007
[32] D.Jovcic, G.N.Pillai "Analytical Modelling of TCSC Dynamics" IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol 20, Issue 2, April
2005, pp. 1097-1104