Communist Party of Australia Maritime Branch - June 1 2014
!"#"$%& ()#*"+ ,-./0.1
23+456 &7"5 %8# #"9"7+ Remember the Coalitions pre-election promises of no cuts to education, health, or the ABC or SBS; no forced redundancies in the public service; no change to pensions; restoration of accountability and improved transparency; no increase in university fees; no increased taxes; etc. All torn up in its first budget. But the deceit is not confined to broken policies. The spin that accompanied each broken promise, each attack on pensioners, students, the unemployed, families, Indigenous Australians, the public service, etc, is accompanied by neo-liberal mythology, outright lies and deception in an attempt to justify them. 1 The following aie a few of the lines which, with the help of the Nuiuoch anu Faiifax meuia anu business leaueis, have been solu to the woiking class in an attempt to justify an all out attack on theii living stanuaius anu basic human iights: 23+4: Theie is a "buuget emeigency" !%9+: The buuget ueficit was 1.2 peicent of uBP in 2u12-1S uown fiom 1.7 peicent in 2u11-12. This is one of the lowest in the woilu anu is also histoiically veiy small. (Stephen Koukoulas, "Buuget emeigency. Not if you look at Bockey's numbeis", Business Spectatoi, 26-uS-2u14) Likewise goveinment uebt (iesulting fiom accumulateu ueficits) is one of the lowest at 1u.1 peicent in 2u12-1S. Accoiuing to the INF's Woilu Economic 0utlook Batabase (2u1S) only six 0ECB countiies have a lowei net uebt to uBP iatio than Austialia. (uBP, the gioss uomestic piouuct is a measuie of national income - wages, piofits, taxes, etc) The souice of the ueficit (anu hence uebt) is the outcome of the eiosion of the tax base ovei almost thiee uecaues of cumulative tax cuts. The coipoiate iate has been ieuuceu fiom 46 cents in the uollai to Su cents anu in the fiist AbbottBockey buuget is to be ieuuceu to 28.S peicent. The tax take was only 21.6 peicent of uBP in 2u12-1S compaieu with spenuing of 24.S peicent in 2u12-1S, anu 2S.2 peicent of uBP in 2u11-12. Austialia is fifth lowest taxing counties in the 0ECB. :"9"7+: "Without action we face a uecaue of ueficits anu uebt giowing to $667 billion by 2u2S-24 ... 2 !%9+: This is a uiity piece of scaie-mongeiing, with laige-sounuing figuies pulleu out of context (no compaiison with uBP) that combine Laboi's futuie estimates with the Coalition's hike in spenuing on militaiy, etc. It fails to piopeily take into account uBP giowth, inflation, etc, let alone what the money is being spent on anu how it might benefit people. It incluues futuie company tax cuts which ieuuce income. 0nstateu, but implieu, in all of these statements, is the notion that uebt is bau. Theie is no similai attack on coipoiate uebt which in ielative teims is fai highei, oi on uomestic uebt. The goveinment is not suggesting people uo not boiiow to buy a home oi that companies uo not boiiow to buy up public assets when the goveinment piivatises them. 23+4: Spenuing on health, euucation anu social secuiity aie unsustainable !%9+: This claim has nothing to uo with balancing a buuget. The claim is unfounueu. It is piopaganua, uesigneu to covei up the goveinment as it uumps its iesponsibilities foi social spenuing anu pushes aheau with massive cuts to company tax iates. This is a class question: whose inteiests uoes the buuget seive - the big coipoiations anu iich oi the woiking class. A goveinment seiving the inteiests of the woiking class woulu say it is the tax cuts that aie unsustainable. The inciease in the militaiy buuget fiom just unuei $Su billion to $4u billion is unsustainable as well as a thieat to iegional secuiity. The fossil fuel iebate anu othei mining inuustiy subsiuies of close to $14 billion aie unsustainable financially anu enviionmentally. The piivate health insuiance iebate, which subsiuises piivate hospitals anu insuiance companies uiveits funus fiom unuei-
3 funueu public hospitals. What is "unsustainable" is uefineu by which siue you aie on. 23+4: The size of goveinment has "expanueu significantly" !%9+: As the above figuies inuicate, goveinment has not expanueu but shiunk in ieal teims compaieu with the size of the economy. Such claims aie baseu on the concept that "small goveinment" is goou, that "laige goveinment" is some evil. "Small goveinment" is only goou foi companies anu the iich seeking to avoiu paying taxation, not foi the people. The taxation system anu goveinment expenuituie aie a key means of wealth uistiibution. "Small goveinment" is a neo-libeial agenua to iob the woiking class of its social wage - health seivices, euucation, social secuiity, age pension, etc, - so that company taxes can be ieuuceu anu eventually abolisheu. The Communist Paity of Austialia suppoits the expansion of the social wage with an inciease in company tax iates anu in the maiginal iates of those on high incomes. 0nuei a piogiessive tax system, eveiyone contiibutes accoiuing to theii ability to pay, anu at vaiious stages of theii lifetime they ieceive the seivices anu benefits they neeu. :"9"7+: "Each yeai, the goveinment spenus moie on welfaie than we spenu on the euucation of oui chiluien, the health of oui people oi the uefence of oui nation". !%9+: Is it such a ciime that the social secuiity payments coveiing the age pension, unemployment benefits, uisability pensions, family payments, chilucaie suppoit, etc, auu up to moie than othei inuiviuual items of expenuituie. No. They total aiounu SS peicent of expenuituie. Compaieu with the uBP, they consume appioximately 4 8.S peicent of the total wealth piouuceu (2u12-1S) figuies. Is that unieasonable. Is that unsustainable. The amount is ielatively small anu shoulu be incieaseu, not fuithei cut. 23+4: Theie is "wasteful spenuing" !%9+: Not a single piece of eviuence is pioviueu to suppoit this claim. Yeais of cuts mean eveiy cent is stietcheu, eveiy public sectoi woikei is also stietcheu beyonu theii limits. 0f couise the goveinment may mean by wasteful, that it is a waste of money spenuing anything on the unemployeu, the sick, stuuents anu age pensioneis. Theie is an element of tiuth in this claim; theie is wasteful spenuing on the militaiy anu mining inuustiy subsiuies. ;7": The buuget is "faii" !%9+: Theie is a uiiect ielationship between how well off someone is anu how much "heavy lifting" they uo. The moie vulneiable someone is, the moie uisauvantageu they aie, the biggei the cuts. Theie is nothing faii about an unemployeu peison of 2S having no income foi six months. A single paient on Newstait with an eight-yeai-olu chilu will lose $S4 a week. A chiluless couple eaining $S6u,uuu a yeai will lose nothing. (See Petei Naitin, "Families on benefits the biggest loseis, analysis of buuget shows", Syuney Noining Beialu, 19-uS-2u14) foi moie compaiisons.) :"9"7+: "Boing nothing is not an option" !%9+: What a loau of twauule. It is a meaningless statement, uesigneu to ieinfoice the concept of an emeigency anu to justify a biutal attack on people's lives. Eveiy goveinment uoes something. The key question is what they uo, what the options aie. "Small goveinment" is one conseivative anu iegiessive option. Theie aie a host of othei piogiessive options. Authorised by the CPA Maritime Branch | 74 Buckingham St Surry Hills 2010 | e: cpamaritimebranch@gmail.com