To,

Honble Chairman,
Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board,
Panchkula.
Subject: Appeal against order dated 15-12-2009 of Chief Executive regarding.
Sir,
Kindly refer to the communication received from the Board that my Efficiency bar, which
was due as on 1-4-2001 was examined and filed by then Chief executive, on 15-12-2009,
violating the instructions issued by the office of the Chief Secretary, Haryana and ignoring
the facts, where as then Member Secretary along with the Establishment branch proposed
crossing of EB, after examining whole facts and found fit case of EB crossing because my
ACRs were not recorded by the competent Authorities, as per time frame policy, decided
by the Chief Secretary of Haryana, where as Honble Lokayukyta observations are also
conveyed to all Head of Department by the Chief Secretary, Haryana.
Hence I strongly protest against the impugned orders dated 15-12-2009 because facts were
twisted by the Section Officer (Legal and Recovery) with the consultation of then CE, who
is holding position of Vice Chairman of tau Devi Lal Trust, after retirement, hence the said
order was politically motivated because in past also, then CE illegally imposed recovery on
me, ignoring the actual facts and I was hold responsible for nothing, appeal against that
order also placed before your good self.
So you are requested to please consider my appeal, against order dated 15-12-2009, which
were never conveyed to me and I have obtained noting portion, under RTI Act, 2005, which
are attached here with for ready references and self explanatory. Please give me
opportunity to explain in person and said order dated 15-12-2009 may kindly be set aside
and my EB, which was due as on 1-4-2001 may please be crossed, for natural justice and
fair, transparent administration, where as it was a great financial loss to me along with
major hardship.
History defined as under:
1. I have obtained the noting portion of personnel files along with the relevant notes under
Right to Information Act, 2005 about dealing and processing the matter and
representations for crossing of Efficiency bars of Naresh Kadian, T.S (L).
2. Noting page 221 to 231 completely defined and processed the matter of crossing of EB of
TS (L), which was due as on 1-4-2001. On page No. 227 and 228, instructions issued vide
letter dated 6-12-2001 by the Chief Secretary explained as "It was also made clear that the
period for which ACR has not been written for any reason like suspension, absence due to
leave or illness, termination of services or any other reason, ACR for the period should be
treated as blank and the case be examined on the basis of available records". P-229
explained that ACR's of Naresh Kadian, TS (L) for the period 2000-01 and 2001-02 were
sent to then non official Member Secretary, which were not recorded by him, P-230 then
Member Secretary recorded as "I recommend to treat the ACRs of Sh. Naresh Kadian for
the period 2000-01 to 2003-04 (Four Years) as 'Unrecorded' for the purpose of examining
the record of the employee for the consideration of EB case as well as for other matters
concerning administration".
3. Page 31 to 33 proved that the services of Naresh Kadian were verified by the account
branch on 10-6-2009 as per NP 30 and ACRs of Naresh Kadian since 1990-91 up to 1999-
2000 were found suitable, hence Establishment Branch proposed the crossing of Efficiency
bars, due as on 1-4-2001 for orders before the Chief Executive, now whole matter twisted
by the Section Officer (Legal and Recovery) along with the CE, as on P-34 and baseless
facts and unjustified, irrelevant position explained by the SO (L and R) that " EB in new
pay scale has been crossed, as per new rules, he further stated that old EB can not crossed
due to non availability of ACR's and due to leave sanctioned, hence as per old rules old EB
can not be crossed due to non availability of ACR's and proposed to file the matter, which
signed by the CE with out any speaking orders and all it happen with the consultation of
CE after discussion. It would be pertinent to mention here that the SO (L and R) date 15-
12-2009 have cutting, overwriting, where as said observation of SO (L and R) are baseless,
irrelevant, damaging career, financial loss to the official concerned Naresh Kadian with
criminal conspiracy because due to non crossing of EB, annual increments from 1-4-2000
up to 1-7-2009 were not granted along with the second ACP, which creates major hardship
to the Naresh Kadian, when everything was justified and cleared up to the level of Member
Secretary in previous noting page, they found fit case for clearing EB then SO (L and R)
along with CE, both are responsible and liable to punishment and departmental action,
Annual increment due as on 1-7-2013 was also not granted, with held for no reasons,
suspension allowances are also not released as per instructions of the Government.
It would be pertinent to mention here that due to non crossing of EB, many annual
increments have been with held illegally along with 2
nd
and 3
rd
ACP.
Sincerely yours,
Naresh Kadian,
Technical Supervisor (Leather),
Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board,
Panchkula.
Correspondence address: C-38, Rose Apartment, sector-14,
Rohini, Delhi 10085.