When learning a language, the most effective method is immersion being surrounded by the language at every turn. Think of how a child learns to speak. She hears her parents talk to her from the moment she is born. Music plays in the back ground, the television blares, chatter is all around the infant. As the child grows, she begins to mimic those sounds, eventually producing words and then simple sentences. It takes 3-5 years of constant bombardment for her to have enough vocabulary to carry on a conversation with an adult. It will be several more years before she will feel like a master in her first tongue. Imagine that child, still in the learning stages of her primary language aquisition, being thrust into a second language. Regardless of the reason, now this child must begin the learning process all over again. True, her tongue is better prepared for making sounds than when she was an infant, but there are new sounds to make, and her tongue is struggling to break muscle memory and move in new ways to make those new sounds. Now see that child learning that new language in an isolated environment. Instruction is given in her native laguage; she does worksheets, simple oral excersises, and listens to audio recordings through head phones for a finite class period. Then she continues her day in her native tongue, learning other subjects, interacting with her peers, hearing her own language for more than twelve hours of her day. Her only exposure to her new language is in that isolated, capsulated class. How can she learn enough to become fluent? Evidence suggests that students with disabilites do not show significant educational gains when educated in segregated special education programs (Dyson, 1999) The same could be argued of second language learners. When English is taught in a self contained enviroment, students have little incentive to use it outside of class. Thus the skill mastered for regurgitation on a test are not cemented and will atrophy quickly with insufficent use. Central to learning any subject taught in school, regardless of the grade level, is the content specific vocabulary. Without the required academic as well as vernacular vocabulary, much of what is being taught goes over the learners head and learning is lost. Compound that with aquiring general conversation skills and rudimentary vocabulary and second language students are confonted with an uphill challenge. With a full inclusion approach to a second language aquisition, this same student would be surrounded by her new language for at least 5 hours a day. This additional time will increase her acquisition and reinforce the knowledge for future use. Her vocabulary will increase faster than through rote memorization. She will begin to pick up on the idioms and nuances that are difficult to explain through a text. Inclusion not only promotes adacemic growth, but also social competence, social skills, and positive peer relations among students of different academic ability ( Artiles & Ortiz, 2002) Full inclusion signals the commitment of the education system to support the academic progress of all of its students. (Shepherd et al.) When all students, regardless of language or ability, are part of the school data and culture, teachers become invested in their success and growth. No longer ignored or marginalized because their scores are not included in school report cards, ELL and special needs students receive an equal opportunity to be exposed and gain knowledge of academic skills they will need in their adult lives. They are pushed to stretch in sometimes uncomfortable ways, but in the discomfort comes growth and progress.
References Artiles, A and Ortiz, A. (Eds.) (2002) English language learners with special education needs: identification, assessment and instrcution. National Library of Education: Washington DC. Dyson, A. (1999). Inclusion and inclusions: Theories and discourses in inclusive educaton. In H. Daniels & P. Garner (Eds.), World Yearbook of education 1999: Inclusive education (pp. 36-53). London: Kogan Page. Shepard, L., Taylor, G., Betebenner, D. (1998) Inclusion of Limited-English-Proficient Students in Rhode Islands Grade 4 Mathematics Performance Assessment, CSE Technical Report 486. Center of Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence, University of California, Santa Cruz.