Zelick, S. (2013). The Perception of Web 2.0 Technologies on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Case Study. Creative Education, 4, 53-93. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.47A2010.
The selected article was a case study examining the perception of Web 2.0 technologies on teaching and learning in higher education. The researcher prepared a survey on Survey Monkey that questioned university educators on their perceptions of online learning. The respondents were asked to answer a series of questions that were prepared by the researcher. The answers to the questions were posed using a Likert scale. The results indicated that there is a relationship between faculty members perception of teaching college courses utilizing Web 2.0 technologies versus the tradition classroom method. According to the researcher the limitations of the study was that faculty members, outside of the United States who dont teach at public universities, generalizations were not relevant. The researcher basically believes that this study did not have any limitations. The researcher surveyed full and part time faculty members at Public Universities in the United States. 1207 people participated in the survey however, 988 or 82% of them were disqualified as they did not meet the criteria. Additional surveys were discarded as the results were incomplete. The total sample size was 178 individuals. The researcher believed that the studys findings can be used to give extra support and training to the groups that were found to have difficulty and negative perceptions of using and implementing Web 2.0 technologies in their classrooms. I believe additional research should be done with a larger sample size, including a global perspective and private universities.
Critique
There were 7 research questions associated with this study. They are listed under the heading Research questions. There was one main question, To what extent do faculty members teaching college courses utilizing Web 2.0 technologies perceive that this method is a practical alternative to the traditional classroom method? Then there were 6 secondary questions, they are To what extent do faculty members perceive that there is an adequate level of development programs available to create their course content utilizing Web 2.0 technologies? To what extent do faculty members perceive that the faculty development programs affecting technology integration are effective? To what extent do faculty members perceive that the impact of the barriers affecting technology integration is hindering their ability to utilize Web 2.0 technologies? Is there a difference in male and female faculty members perceptions regarding their use of Web 2.0 technologies in their courses? Is there a difference in faculty members perceptions regarding their use of Web 2.0 technologies in their courses respective to their age? Is there a difference in faculty members perceptions regarding their use of Web 2.0 technologies in their courses respective to their employment status? There was no formal review of literature, however there is a short section called Background of the Study which looks into research done in the aspects of informational technologies, the use of technology and internet in increasing student engagement and active learning, and Web 2.0 technologies and their integration into learning systems. It does a good progression from the beginning of the internet to cover the full integration of Web 2.0 technologies into online learning and the challenges in doing so. The article was well written with very few errors in grammar and mechanics. The tables and graphs were integrated into the text of the article instead of appearing in a separate Appendix, which can cause some readers to get confused or disoriented. The Article was published in the journal Creative Education and both its diction and publication make it easily accessible to its appropriate audience as well as anyone else interested in looking over the perceptions of instructors on the usefulness of Web 2.0 Technologies. By the end of the article it was clear what knowledge the researcher gained. There is a total of 14 pages that explain the results of the study and analyzes the charts and graphs of information that accompany the findings of the study. There is also a section labeled Discussion of Findings which explains the results without all of the technical aspects that were included in the Results section of the article. According to the Conclusion there is a relationship between facultys perceptions of teaching using Web 2.0 verses in person teaching and there is a relationship between facultys age and gender and their perceptions of teaching using Web 2.0 technologies. However there is not a relationship between faculties perceptions of development programs and creating course content using Web 2.0 and technology integration and effectiveness. The implicit theory being tested in this research study looks at how the perception of Instructors has an impact on their fluency and use of Web 2.0 resources in their classrooms. This theory isnt explicitly stated in either the Introduction or conclusion; however through the title of the Article and the 7 research questions being studied it is implied.
Conclusion
The largest limitations of this study was the small sample size. The researcher should have contacted more schools and included more faculty in the study. Since this study determined perception, age and gender were all factors in the implementation of Web 2.0 technologies to create classroom content this study showed it is valuable and more studies should be completed with larger sampling sizes. This study is useful because it gives recommendations based on the findings that could help an organization implementing Web 2.0 technologies in their schools. The study can be used to determine which sets of faculty will need more support and reassurance in using Web 2.0 technologies so their perceptions will not negatively affect the creation of course content. The knowledge that males are less likely to utilize Web 2.0 technologies and that faculty over 50 have never used most types of Web 2.0 technologies can allow specialized training to be in place to help these particular groups to implement the tools in their course content. While I have been using Web 2.0 technologies for quite some time, having been part of various online schools, I dont believe the results of this study can help me directly; however they can help me to point out groups of people in my work setting who may need more support or be more apprehensive when asked to use these tools.
American Journal of Psychiatry Volume 133 Issue 3 1976 (Doi 10.1176 - Ajp.133.3.349) ROME, HOWARD P. - The Working Brain - An Introduction To Neuropsychology Luria's Neuropsychological Investigation