Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Each day you are bombarded with messages that try to influence youthat
urge you to buy a particular brand of shoes, to support a particular cause, to
vote in an upcoming election, and to see the latest blockbuster film. Dealing
with these competing messages requires that you examine ideas, ask questions,
challenge arguments, and decide which viewpoints are worth acceptingin
other words, that you think critically. Much of the information you absorb
in college will be obsolete in a few years, but the critical and analytical skills
you develop will serve you the rest of your life.
In college, a crucial element of critical thinking involves learning to read
critically, because much of what you write and think about is in response to
what you read.
8a How do you read to understand
complex material?
College reading assignments pose special challenges. In high school, teach-
ers may cover a textbook chapter in a few days or a week; in college, instruc-
tors often assign several chapters in the same amount of time, along with
supplementary readings from scholarly journals, literary texts, and other
sources. College assignments may also address more abstract ideas and use
more complicated language. Whereas you may be accomplished at reading
sources that summarize and analyze issues for youas high school text-
books or popular magazines doin college youll often have to weigh
issues, interpret data, or negotiate a range of primary and secondary sources
on your own.
But the classroom isnt the only place youll encounter difficult texts.
Youll also sift through competing viewpoints and complex material when
you research campaign issues before voting, follow news coverage of a local
event, participate in online discussions, or draft a report at work. To navi-
gate these texts, youll need to be an active, engaged reader.
8 How Do You Read
and Think Critically?
C H A P T E R
6938.RUSZ_PT02_pp075-180.qxd 12/21/09 4:42 PM Page 103
1 Preview the text. Just as you can navigate an unfamiliar city more
easily when you have a map, youll find it easier to read an unfamiliar text if
you first scope out its features.
Title. What does the title tell you about the pieces content and purpose?
Point of view. Is the authors point of view known and relevant? What
are the interests and biases of the publisher or the sponsoring institu-
tion? Does the text purport to be objective, or does it present itself as
subjective and personal?
Before reading, also determine your goals: Are you skimming to see if a text
is relevant to a paper youre writing? Are you interested in general concepts
and arguments, or do you need to know details? Do you want to develop
your own opinions on the subject? These goals should influence how much
time you spend reading and which strategies you use.
2 Look up unfamiliar terms and concepts. Understanding diffi-
cult material is easier if you have the relevant background knowledge. When
you preview a text, circle key terms, concepts, or topics that sound unfamil-
iar. For instance, youll feel completely at sea reading an article about the
African diaspora if you dont know what diaspora means and your knowl-
edge of the geography of the continent is fuzzy. A look at a dictionary and
an encyclopedia entry on Africa will put you on more solid ground.
3 Slow down. Read slowly and reread two or three times to fully grasp
a complex argument or explanation. Some experts advise reading everything
twice: the first time just to understand what the writer is saying, the second
to focus on your own reactions and opinions. If you are reading a literary
104 How Do You Read and Think Critically?
8a
crit
6938.RUSZ_PT02_pp075-180.qxd 12/21/09 4:42 PM Page 104
105 Critical Reading
8a
crit
text for a class in which your instructor will expect you to conduct a close
analysis, rereading is especially important; see Chapter 11 for more details.
4 Annotate the text to clarify and respond to its content.
Critical reading involves more than passively absorbing words on a page. Its
an active process. One way to read actively is to annotatethat is, attach
notes, comments, and questions directly to the text, either by writing on a
printed source (or a photocopy of it) or by using the commenting features
of your word-processing program.
If youre not accustomed to taking notes on your reading, here are some
useful strategies.
Context notes. Notes can also help you follow a texts structure. At
crucial transitions, jot down a key word or two that explains where the
argument is going or how a new point fits in: Opposing argument,
Previous theories, Example 3, for instance.
Response notes. Dont just accept what a text says; talk back. Carrying
on a dialogue with your reading develops your own perspective on the
issues raised. Does an authors proposal excite or anger you? Write Yes!
or Bad logic. If the text raises questions, write them down: But what
about the innocent victims? or Does this argument follow?
The box on page 106 shows how one reader used these three strategies to
annotate the opening passage of an opinion piece she read while researching
a paper on women in math and science professions. She made response
notes in the left-hand margin and content and context notes in the right-
hand margin; notice how these notes help her follow a fairly complicated
argument.
When youre working on a project that involves research, its especially
important to take notes. Your annotations identify ideas and information
worth returning to, highlight passages you want to quote in your paper, and
help you to synthesize and engage in dialogue with the authors and texts
you are encountering. See Chapters 46 and 47 for more on incorporating
material youve read into a research paper.
6938.RUSZ_PT02_pp075-180.qxd 12/21/09 4:42 PM Page 105
106 How Do You Read and Think Critically?
8a
crit
Highlight Sample Annotations
Caryl Rivers
# of women
in science is
decreasing
they are asking
whether teach-
ers can help
reverse this
trend
Possible cause
#1: girls brains
not suited for
math
look up
fact or his
opinion? when
published?
The Persistence of Gender Myths
in Math
By Rosalind Chait Barnett and Caryl Rivers
(Education Week, October 13, 2004)
Should we be worried that young girls are not
pursuing math-related careers at the same rate as
young men? After all, in our technological era,
many of tomorrows well-paying jobs will require
competence at mathematics. But today, women
make up only 19 percent of the science,
engineering, and technology workforce. In 1998,
only 16 percent of computer science degrees were
awarded to women, down from nearly 40 percent in
1984, and the downward trend continued in 2003.
Can teachers have a role in changing this
picture? Or would they just be going up against
innate biological differences in a futile attempt at
social engineering?
Some argue that girls dont have the right
brain structures to be good at math. Cambridge
University Psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen, the
author of The Essential Difference, goes so far as to
say that men have systematizing brains well-
suited for the hard sciences. Women, in contrast,
have empathizing brains, designed for
caretaking and mothering. And the best-selling
author Michael Gurian (The Wonder of Boys) says
that only 20 percent of girls have the right brain
structure for performing well at math.
It is indeed the case that men far outnumber
women in math-related fields. But is this evidence
for innate male superiority? The answer is no.
New research finds few sex differences in the math
abilities of boys and girls. In 2001, sociologists
Erin Leahey and Guang Guo of the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill looked at some
20,000 math scores of students between the ages
of 4 and 18 and found no differences of any
magnitude, even in areas that are supposedly male
domains, such as reasoning skills and geometry.
The finding astonished the researchers, who said,
Based on prior literature . . . we expected large
gender differences to emerge as early as junior
high school, but our results do not confirm this.
And a meta-analysis of SAT scores for some 3
million students found that girls and boys
performed virtually identically in math.
new study
w/opposite
finding
6938.RUSZ_PT02_pp075-180.qxd 12/21/09 4:42 PM Page 106
5 Apply your critical skills when reading online. Although
most critical reading strategies apply to both print and online environ-
ments, electronic texts pose special challenges. Experts on reading have
coined the term screen literacy to describe the unique skills readers need to
navigate online texts.
Online texts are less stable and more loosely structured than printed
texts. Reading a Web site or blog, for example, you may scroll through long
passages without page markers, follow complicated series of links, and
encounter several media simultaneously. The content or format of the text
may change periodically. These features can make it hard to find your place
within a text and to return to important material.
The boundaries that separate one online text from another are also
blurred. In researching a paper for your American literature class, for exam-
ple, you may wonder whether a link to biographical information on the
poet Walt Whitman thats embedded in an online text of Leaves of Grass is a
part of that text or a separate text.
These differences mean that you should adjust your reading process
when you read online. Here are some strategies that experts recommend:
Be selective about what you choose to read. Scan to find the most rele-
vant items.
Approach reading with your own agenda rather than always following
the authors preferred path through a text.
How much evidence does the writer present? Does the amount of
support seem substantial enough, or does the writer rely on just one or
two examples?
Is the evidence fairly and fully presented? Do you suspect that the
writer has manipulated information in order to make his or her case
look better?
Guard against the tendency to gravitate toward arguments that confirm
your own beliefs and to avoid those that dont. Try to find arguments writ-
ten by women and men, liberals and conservatives, and supporters as well as
opponents of a proposal. See Section 9a for more on evaluating the evidence
presented in an argument.
110 How Do You Read and Think Critically?
8b
crit
6938.RUSZ_PT02_pp075-180.qxd 12/21/09 4:42 PM Page 110
4 Assess whether the writers claims go beyond what the evi-
dence actually supports. Does the writer draw conclusions that go
beyond what his or her support warrants? For instance, safety experts once
made claims about the safety of air bags based on crash-test data calculated
for crash dummies the size of adult men. These claims didnt hold true for
children and small women. Faced with dozens of fatalities attributed to
injuries caused by air bags, those experts admitted that their original claims
went beyond what the data had established.
Although overstating ones claims doesnt usually result in such tragic
consequences, you should question any argument that stretches its conclu-
sions too far.
5 Look for whats not there: the unstated assumptions,
beliefs, and values that underlie the argument. Does the writer
take for granted certain knowledge or beliefs? If what someone takes for
granted in an argument can reasonably be disputed, then you should chal-
lenge the authors claims.
Consider the assumptions made in this sentence, taken from an article
advocating the legalization of drugs.
The violence brought about by the black market in drugs is attributable
in large part to the fact that we have chosen to make criminals out of
people who have a disease.
The statement makes two assumptions: (1) People who buy and sell
drugs do so primarily because they suffer from a sicknessaddiction
beyond their control. (2) It is wrong to criminalize behavior that results
from illness. Both assumptions may well be true, but without further expla-
nation and support, a reader might question them on the following
grounds: (1) Drug offenders may engage in illegal behavior not because
theyre sick but for profit, for entertainment, or as a response to peer pres-
sure. (2) Even if drug abuse results from illness, so do many other crimes
punishable by law; we dont legalize drunk driving just because many drunk
drivers are alcoholics. Also see Section 9a on how to spot and evaluate hid-
den assumptions in an argument.
6 Note any contradictions. Look for places where pieces of an argu-
ment dont fit together. Suppose a political candidate advocates mandatory
prison sentences for first-time drug offenders yet dismisses as immature
111 Critical Thinking
8b
crit
6938.RUSZ_PT02_pp075-180.qxd 12/21/09 4:42 PM Page 111
behavior her own use of alcohol and other drugs as a young adult. One
should question why the candidate excuses for herself behavior that she con-
demns in others.
7 Examine the writers word choices to identify underlying
biases. Everyone has biasesits unavoidable. Its only natural that writ-
ers who want to convince others use language that favors their own point of
view. But critical reading requires that you be sensitive to such biases so that
you arent unwittingly swayed by them.
Being a critical reader doesnt mean you have to distrust everything you
read. But you should be alert when writers overload their prose with what
rhetoricians call god terms (words such as democratic, responsible, natural,
fair) or devil terms (words such as destructive, fanatic, immoral, selfish). See
Chapter 15 for a more detailed discussion of biased language.
8 Be skeptical of simple solutions to complex problems, and
resist black-and-white thinking. Be wary of quick, easy answers to
difficult problems. Most serious issues are complexthere is seldom one
right solution.
Consider the complex issue of affirmative action in college admissions
and the calls from many sectors that schools judge prospective students on
merit rather than taking racial, ethnic, and economic background into
account. Here are a few of the questions that complicate this solution.
What, exactly, constitutes merit? Test scores and grades? Special tal-
ent in a single area, such as music or sports? Good character? If all these
factors count, how should each be weighed?
Have you labeled all the important elements so that readers can interpret
numbers, percentages, and headings? Provide a legend if necessary to
explain terms or unfamiliar abbreviations.
Have you argued for no more than the data can actually prove?