Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VULNERABILITY
Relative vulnerability of national econonomies to potential impact
of CC on their fisheries
Very low
Low
Moderate
High
No data
Allison et al 2009
Fore loop with relatively predictable dynamics and back loop marked
by uncertainty and experimentation (from Walker and Salt 2006)
What can we learn from resilience
theory
In fisheries almost all the emphasis up till now has been on the growth
(r) and conservation (K) phases
Under the influence of drivers, often ‘external’ drivers, systems can
enter a release phase (Ώ), disassemble and re-organize (α) in very
different forms
Climate change is likely to be a powerful driver of change
We are coming to accept that humans cannot control ecosystems, and
social-ecological stability is the exception rather than the norm
Resilience reduces the likelihood of release and increases the
likelihood that, in the event of release, re-organization will not result
in major changes
Resilience requires, above all, diversity (genetic and species), low stress
from other factors, ‘healthy’ and productive populations.
Effective EAF (in ecological and human dimensions) should lead to
resilient social-ecological systems.
Responding to the impacts: adaptation to climate
change through broader vulnerability reduction
• Ecological Resilience –
implementation of ecosystem
approach to fisheries and
aquaculture, principles of the Code
of Conduct for Responsible
Fisheries
• Economic and Social Resilience –
diversification, flexible access
rights, insurance
• Technological innovation –
aquaculture systems
• Planned adaptation –policy
coherence across sectors (water,
agriculture, CZM)
• Disaster preparedness and response
Typology for adaptation of fisheries to CC
Impact on fisheries Potential adaptation measures Responsibility Timescale
1. Increased variability Diversify livelihood portfolio Private Either
of yield (indirect Insurance schemes Public Anticipatory
ecological)
Precautionary management for Public Anticipatory
resilient ecosystems
Implementation of integrated and Public Anticipatory
adaptive management
2. Change in distribution Private research and development Private Anticipatory
of fisheries (indirect and investments in technologies*
ecological) Migration Private Either
3. Reduced profitability Reduce costs to increase efficiency Private Either
(indirect ecological Diversify livelihoods Private Either
and socio-
economic) Exit the fishery for other liivelihoods Private Reactive
4. Increased Hard defences* Public Anticipatory
vulnerability of Early warning systems and education Public Anticipatory
coastal and riparian
communities and Rehabilitation and disaster response Public Reactive
infrastructure to Integrated coastal management Public Anticipatory
flooding, sea level
Infrastructure provision (protecting Public Anticipatory
and surges (direct)
harbours and landing sites)
General information needs
marine biogeochemistry and water mass properties
changes in atmospheric forcing (wind, heat, freshwater)
monitor trends in resources, communities and ecosystems
prediction of impacts, identify the most vulnerable ecosystsms,
individuals and communities
possible government facilitated adaptation
the constraints on private adaptations
desirable adaptations which contribute to long term reductions in
vulnerabilities, rather than short-term coping strategies which may
enhance vulnerability