You are on page 1of 2

International Journal of EmergingTrends & Technology in Computer Science(IJETTCS)

Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org, editorijettcs@gmail.com


Volume 3, Issue 2, March April 2014 ISSN 2278-6856


Volume 3, Issue 2 March April 2014 Page 21


Abstract: It is duty of Search engines to understand the
taste of user and provide them results. It is not practical to
request feedback on searchers perceptions and search
outcomes directly from users, Search engines should be
capable of estimating the satisfaction of user from behavioral
signals including query refinement, result clicks and dwell
times. This analysis of behavior in the aggregate leads to the
development of global metrics such as satisfied result click
through (typically operational zed as result page clicks with
dwell time exceeding a particular threshold) that are then
applied to all searchers behavior to estimate satisfaction
levels. There different kinds of people around the world with
large differences in their ideologies and tastes. In this paper
we model the search according to their needs based on
analyzing the history of their searches.

Keywords: Semantic Web, Ontology, Relevance Based
Search, Content Based Search.

1. INTRODUCTION
Internet is place where data can be found enormously.
The network information grows exponentially due to this.
A search engine is a tool which is mainly used to fetch
data from such a big ocean of internet that enables users
to locate information on the World Wide Web. II. It
makes user to use more time to deal with the information
they are not interested in. Against the background,
personalized meta-search engine is one way to solve the
problem. The meaning of personalization is, search
engine that can help users to sort important information
for them by using user's interest. Search engine will get
the users' interest at the beginning of the results, so it is
very convenient for users to access useful information. In
this paper we introduce the design and implementation of
meta-search engine. We propose a personalized search
approach that can easily extend a conventional search
engine on the client side. This paper suggests a new
approach that is based on some model which considers
semantic aspects and uses them to implement a Meta-
Search Engine.

2. RELATED WORKS
There are a number of areas of related work relevant to
the research described in this paper. These include
methods and metrics for the evaluation of search systems,
and inferring satisfaction and result relevance from
observed search behavior, including individual actions
and connected sequences of search behavior. Search
systems are traditionally evaluated using the classical
methodology involving a collection of documents, a set of
pre-defined queries, and relevance judgments provided by
human judges for subsets of the collection with respect to
the queries. The performance of search systems in
retrieving relevant content from the collection and
ranking it appropriately is determined using retrieval
metrics such as MAP and NDCG. These metrics employ a
user model of how searchers inspect the result sets
presented to them and compute estimates of relevance and
relevance gain at different rank positions. These metrics
are query based and ignore the connection between
multiple queries occurring in a search session.
The relevance judgments that these methods use are also
expensive to collect and potentially noisy given that the
third-party judges have limited knowledge of users
underlying search intent. It is therefore preferable to
explore other methods of measuring engine performance,
especially those that have lower cost, are more scalable,
and are sourced from searchers not third-party judges.
Initial work on implicit feedback focused on client-side
monitoring of events such as document retention as well
as dwell time estimates associating the amount of time
spent examining a document with that documents
relevance. Moving from laboratory settings to Web-scale
experimentation, implicit feedback also has utility in
providing training data for learning-to rank algorithms
and inferring search preferences. Radlinski et al. Showed
that interleaving the results of two ranking functions and
presenting the interleaved results to users can serve as a
good predictor of relative search engine performance.

3 PROPOSED SYSTEM
In the proposed system, we propose a content ontology to
accommodate the extracted content and location concepts
as well as the relationships among the concepts. We
introduce different entropies to indicate the amount of
concepts associated with a query and how much a user is
interested in these concepts. With the entropies, we are
able to estimate the effectiveness of personalization for
different users and different queries.
3.1 Design

Relevancy Based Content Search
in Semantic Web

Vinotha S.R
1
, Vikneshwaran J K
2
and Prashanth S
3


1,2&3
Dhanalakshmi College of Engineering, Department of Computer Science
and Engineering, Chennai, TamilNadu, India
International Journal of EmergingTrends & Technology in Computer Science(IJETTCS)
Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org, editorijettcs@gmail.com
Volume 3, Issue 2, March April 2014 ISSN 2278-6856


Volume 3, Issue 2 March April 2014 Page 22


From the experiments made on the ontological
implementation of search engines, it was able to achieve
90% of desired result and the search engine built by this
methodology paves way for more technical and logical
enhancements in innovation of technology. Here the taste
and preferences of the user were largely able to achieve
based on the study. Technical implementation of study of
people taste is achieved by the code which stands in
browser and observes the users wish in searching the
content. This stood as a great support in reading the
minds of the user for providing better result logically and
technically.

3.2 Procedure
This system consists of a PHP front with the composition
of the background html program. The user interface using
PHP production is used with the user interaction, the
system obtains the keywords entered by the user. It then
turns the query to the URL that can get results from
Google. Then the page crawling module will search
request processing module based on the module generated
by the URL of the web pages to crawl. Due to the page
coming from different sources (respectively from Google),
each page is independently analyzed by engine. This is
page by page analysis engine module to extract the key
content, such as extracting the results of each of the page
URL, title, and text descriptions.
Then word segmentation results are achieved by the page
analysis module. Result modelling module will use the
result of English word segmentation. Otherwise, the
result modelling will use the vector directly. Then the
system will get the user's interest vector, this vector will
use to calculate cosines of angel between result vector and
user vector. The system will use these values to sort the
results and feedback to users.

4. Conclusion
Looking back at the evaluation of investigations into
Ontology based search it has been interesting to see the
depth of interoperability that was able to achieve. The
size/time to create search engine coupled with facility of
user oriented ontology factor is large, but it provides best
user experience and satisfaction. It is the platform that
will improve over time and the adoption of this
technology in modern web applications would yield a
greater result of efficiency. Such detailed note has been
implemented in this project where the data request from
the beginning of search to receiving data are completely
packed for best performance. It provides vast application
in various domain right from social networking to public
uses. It could be adopted in any government operations
for searching any legal records. It can also be used for
accessing files of any type with great security. The
accuracy and speed of retrieval either in form of text or
files been sent is the big advantage of this project or
contributes to further innovation in larger level.

References
[1] J . Cardoso, Idea Group, Inc. Semantic Web Services
Theory, Tools, and Applications, 2007.
[2] T. Berners-Lee, J . Hendler, and O. Lassila, The
SemanticWeb, Scientific Am. Magazine, vol. 284, no. 5,
pp. 34-43, 2001.
[3] M. Burstein, C. Bussler, M. Zaremba, T. Finin, M.N.
Huhns, M. Paolucci, A.P. Sheth, and S. illiams, A
Semantic Web Services Architecture, IEEE Internet
Computing, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 72-81, Sept./Oct. 2005
[4] Web Ontology Language for Services (OWL-S), W3C
Member Submission,
http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/, 2004.



AUTHOR
S.R. Vinotha working as an Assistant
Professor in the Department of CSE
,Dhanalakshmi College of Engineering,
Chennai, India. She received her BE (CSE)
fromErode Sengunthar Engineering College, Perundurai
and ME (CSE) from National Engineering College,
Kovilpatti in 2009. She has five years of teaching
experience in the Department of Computer Science &
Engineering. Her research interests include image
processing, web technology, and data mining. She has
presented nine papers in national/international conferences
conferences and journals.

You might also like