Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section 3
Design Principles
A. General
1. Scope
This Section contains definitions and principles for using
the formulae in the following Sections as well as indications
concerning structural details.
2. Permissible stresses and required sectional
properties
In the following Sections permissible stresses have been
stated in addition to the formulae for calculating the section
moduli and cross sectional areas of webs of frames, beams,
girders, stiffeners etc. and may be used when determining
the scantlings of those elements by means of direct strength
calculations. The permissible stresses may be increased
by up to 10% where exact stress analyses are carried out
in accordance with approved calculation methods, e.g. where
the finite element method is applied or else proof is
presented by full scale measurements.
The required section moduli and web areas are related on
principle to an axis which is parallel to the connected
plating.
For profiles usual in the trade and connected vertically to
the plating in general the appertaining sectional properties
are given in tables.
Where webs of stiffeners and girders are not fitted vertically
to the plating (e.g. frames on the shell in the flaring fore
body) the sectional properties (moment of inertia, section
modulus and shear area) have to be determined for an axis
which is parallel to the plating.
For bulb profiles and flat bars the section modulus of the
inclined profile can be calculated simplified by multiplying
the corresponding value for the vertically arranged profile
by sin where is the smaller angle between web and
attached plating.
Note
For bulb profiles and flat bars in general needs only be
taken into account where is less than 75.
Furthermore, with asymmetric profiles where additional
stresses occur according to L. the required section modulus
must be increased by the factor k
sp
depending on the type
of profile, see L.
3. Plate panels subjected to lateral pressure
The formulae for plate panels subjected to lateral pressure
as given in the following Sections are based on the
assumption of an uncurved plate panel having an aspect
ratio b/a 2,24. >
e
m1
/e 0 0,36 0,64 0,82 0,91 0,96 0,98 1,00 1,00
e
m2
/e 0 0,20 0,37 0,52 0,65 0,75 0,84 0,89 0,90
e
m1
is to be applied where girders are loaded by uniformly
distributed loads or else by not less than 6 equally spaced single
loads.
e
m2
is to be applied where girders are loaded by 3 or less single
loads.
Intermediate values may be obtained by direct interpolation.
= length between zero-points of bending moment curve,
i.e. unsupported span in case of simply supported girders
and 0,6 x unsupported span in case of constraint of both
ends of girder
e = width of plating supported, measured from centre to
centre of the adjacent unsupported fields.
2.2 The effective cross sectional area of plates is not to
be less than the cross sectional area of the face plate.
2.3 Where the angle between web of stiffeners or else
of girders and the attached plating is less than 75 the
required section modulus is to be multiplied by the factor
1/sin .
2.4 The effective width of stiffeners and girders subjected
to compressive stresses may be determined according to
F.2.2, but is in no case to be taken greater than determined
by 2.1.
3. Cantilevers
Where cantilevers are fitted at every frame, the effective
Section 3 - Design Principles F 3 - 4
width of plating may be taken as the frame spacing.
Where cantilevers are fitted at a greater spacing the effective
width of plating at the respective cross section may
approximately be taken as the distance of the cross section
from the point on which the load is acting, however, not
greater than the spacing of the cantilevers.
F. Proof of Buckling Strength
1)
1. Definitions
a = length of single or partial plate field in [mm]
b = breadth of single plate field in [mm]
= aspect ratio of single plate field
=
a
b
n = number of single plate field breadths within the
partial or total plate field
longitudinal : stiffiner in the direction of the length a
transverse : stiffiner in the direction of the length b
Fig. 3.2 Definition of plate fields subject to buckling
t = nominal plate thickness in [mm]
= t
a
t
K
in [mm]
t
a
= plate thickness as built in [mm]
t
K
= corrosion allowance according to K. in [mm]
x
= membrane stress in x-direction in [N/mm
2
]
y
= membrane stress in y-direction in [N/mm
2
]
= shear stress in the x-y plane in [N/mm
2
]
Compressive and shear stresses are to be taken positive,
tension stresses are to be taken negative.
Guidance
If the stresses in the x- and y-direction contain already the
Poisson - effect, the following modified stress values may
be used:
x
=
x
0,3
y
0,91
y
=
y
0,3
x
0,91
, = stresses containing the Poisson-effect
x
y
= edge stress ratio according to Table 3.3
F
1
= correction factor for boundary condition at
the long. stiffeners according to Table 3.2
Table 3.2 Correction Factor F
1
Correction factor F
1
1,0 for stiffeners sniped at both ends
Guidance values * : 1,05 for flat bars
where both ends 1,10 for bulb sections
are effectively 1,20 for angle and tee-sections
connected to 1,30 for girders of high rigidity
adjacent structures (e.g. bottom transverses)
* Exact values may be determined by direct calculations.
F
2
= weighting factor according to Table 3.3 and/ or
3.4 accounting for the effect of linear buckling
on plate buckling for the stress direction con-
sidered, linear buckling occurs when F
2
> 0.
e
= reference stress
= [kN/m
2
] 0,9 E
t
b
2
E = Young's modulus
= [N/mm
2
] for steel 2,06 10
5
= [N/mm
2
] for aluminium alloys 0,69 10
5
R
eH
= nominal yield point in [N/mm
2
] for hull structural
steels according to Section 2, B.2.
= 0,2 % proof stress in [N/mm
2
] for aluminium
alloys
S = safety factor
= 1,1 in general
= 1,2 for structures which are exclusively exposed
to local loads
= 1,05 for combinations of statistically independent
loads
1)
The calculation method is based on DIN-standard 18800.
Section 3 - Design Principles F 3 - 5
Table 3.3 Plane Plate Fields
Load case
Edge stress
ratio
Aspect ratio
Buckling factor K
Reductions factor
Weighting factor F
2
1
1 >
>
0
> 1
K =
8,4
1,1
x
= 1 for
c
x
= for > c c
1
0,22
2
c = (1,25 0,12) <
1,25
c
=
c
2
1 1
0,88
c
0 > > 1 K = 7,63 (6,26 10 )
<
1 K = (1 )
2
5,975
2
1 >
>
0 >
1
K = F
1
1
1
2
2
2,1
( 1,1)
y
= c
1
R F
2
(H R)
2
c = (1,25 0,12) <
1,25
R = for <
c
1
c
R = 0,22 for
c
F = 0 1
K
0,91
1
2
p
c
1
=
2
0,5 1 3
2
P
2
P
c
1
= 1 for due to direct
y
loads
c
1
= 0 for due 1
F
1
y
to bending (in general)
c
1
= 0 for due to bending
y
in extreme load cases
(e.g. w. t. bulkheads)
H = R
2
c (T T
2
4)
T =
14
15
1
3
0 > > 1 1 <
<
1,5
K =
F
1
1
1
2
2
2,1
1,1
(1 )
2
( 13,9 10 )
> 1,5
K =
F
1
1
1
2
2
2,1
1,1
(1 )
2
(5,87 1,87
2
8,6
2
10 )
<
1 1 <
<
(1 )
3
4
K = F
1
1
2
5,975
> (1 )
3
4
K = F
1
1
2
3,9675
0,5375
1
4
1,87
3
1 >
>
0
> 0
K =
4 0,425
1
2
3 1
x
= 1 for 0,7
x
= for > 0,7
1
2
0,51
0 > >
1 K =
4 0,425
1
2
(1 )
5 (1 3,42 )
4
1 >
>
1
> 0
K = 0,425
1
2
3
2
Section 3 - Design Principles F 3 - 6
Table 3.3 Plane Plate Fields (Cont.)
Load case
Edge stress
ratio
Aspect ratio
Buckling factor K
Reductions factor
Weighting factor F
2
5
>
1
0 < < 1
K = K
3
= 1 for 0,84
= for > 0,84
0,84
= 5,34
4
2
K
= 4
5,34
2
6
K = K r
K = K according to line 5
r = Reductions factor
= 1
d
a
a
1
d
b
b
with 0,7 and 0,7
d
a
a
d
b
b
7
>
1,64
K = 1,28
x
= 1 for 0,7
x
= for > 0,7
1
2
0,51
< 1,64 K =
1
2
0,56 0,13
2
8
>
2
3
<
2
3
K = 6,97
x
= 1 for 0,83
x
= 1,13
1
0,22
2
for > 0,83
K =
1
2
2,5 5
2
9
>
4
K = 4
4 > > 1 K = 4
4
3
4
2,74
<
1 K =
4
2
2,07 0,67
2
10
>
4
K = 6,97
4 > > 1 K = 6,97
4
3
4
3,1
<
1 K =
4
2
2,07 4
2
Explanations for boundary conditions : plate edge free
plate edge simply supported
plate edge clamped
Section 3 - Design Principles F 3 - 7
Table 3.4 Curved plate field R/t 2500 <
Load case
Aspect ratio
b / R
Buckling factor K
Reduction factor *
Weighting factor F 2
1a
1b
p
e
= external pressure in
[N/mm
2
]
b
R
<
1,63
R
t
K =
b
R t
3
( R t )
b
0,35
0,175
x
= 1
2)
for 0,4
x
= 1,274 0,686
for 0,4 < 1,2
x
= for > 1,2
0,65
2
b
R
> 1,63
R
t
K = 0,3
b
2
R
2
2,25
R
2
b t
2
2
b
R
<
0,5
R
t
K = 1
2
3
b
2
R t
y
= 1
2)
for 0,25
y
= 1,233 0,933
for 0,25 < 1
y
= 0.3 /
3
for 1 < 1,5
y
= 0.2 /
2
for > 1,5
b
R
> 0,5
R
t
K =
0,267
b
2
R t
3
b
R
t
R
>
0,4
b
2
R t
3
b
R
<
R
t
K =
0,6 b
R t
R t
b
0,3
R t
b
2
as in load case 1a
b
R
>
R
t
K =
0,3
b
2
R
2
0,291
R
2
b t
2
4
K = K
= 1
for 0,4
=
1,274 0,686
for 0,4 < 1,2
=
0,65
2
for > 1,2
b
R
<
8,7
R
t
K
= 28,3
0,67 b
3
R
1,5
t
1,5
0,5
b
R
> 8,7
R
t
K
= 0,28
b
2
R R t
Explanations for boundary conditions : plate edge free
plate edge simply supported
plate edge clamped
1)
For curevd plate fields with a very large radius the -value need not to be taken less than derived for the expanded plane field.
2)
For curved single fields. e.g. the bilge strake, which are located within plane partial or total fields, the reduction factor may be taken as follows:
Load case 1b :
x
= 0,8/
2
1,0 ; load case 2:
y
= 0,65/
2
1,0 <
<
x
S
x
R
eH
e
1
y
S
y
R
eH
e
2
B
x
y
S
2
R
eH
2
S 3
R
eH
e
3
<
1,0
Each term of the above condition must be less than 1,0.
The reduction factors
x
,
y
and
2,0
B
x
and
y
positive
(compression stress)
x
y
5
0
B
x
or
y
negative
(tension stress)
1
2.2 Effective width of plating
The effective width of plating may be determined by the
following formulae:
b
m
= for longitudinal stiffeners
x
b
a
m
= for transverse stiffeners
y
a
see also Fig. 3.2.
The effective width of plating is not to be taken greater
than the value obtained from E.2.1.
Note
The effective width of stiffened flange plates of girders e
m
x
(y) = ( )
x
y
e
c c
y
e
c c
1 1 2 1 2
1 3 4 2 1 2 + +
c
1
= 0 c
1
1
x
x
2
1
c
2
=
( )
15
05
1 2
.
.
" "
e
e e
m m
+
x1
,
x2
= normal stresses in flange plates of adjacent
girder 1 and 2 with spacing e.
= proportionate effective width of and e
m1
e
m1
"
e
m1
'
respectively of girder 1 within the distance
e
= proportionate effective width of and e
m2
e
m2
"
e
m2
'
respectively of girder 2 within the distance
e
y = distance of considered location from girder
1
Scantlings of plates and stiffeners are in general to be
determined according to the maximum stresses x(y) at
girder webs and stiffeners respectively. For stiffeners under
compression arranged parallel to the girder web with
spacing b no lesser value than 0,25 R
eH
shall be inserted
for x(y=b).
Shear stress distribution in the flange plates may be
assumed linearly.
2.3 Webs and flanges
For non-stiffened webs and flanges of sections and girders
proof of sufficient buckling strength as for single plate fields
is to be provided according to 2.1.
Note
Within 0,6 L amidships the following guidance values are
recommended for the ratio web depth to web thickness
and/or flange breadth to flange thickness:
flat bars:
h
w
t
w
<
19,5 k
angle-, tee and bulb sections:
web:
h
w
t
w
<
60,0 k
flange:
b
i
t
f
<
19,5 k
b
i
= b
1
or b
2
according to Fig. 3.3, the larger value
is to be taken.
3. Proof of partial and total fields
3.1 Longitudinal and transverse stiffeners
Proof is to be provided that the longitudinal and transverse
stiffeners of partial and total plate fields comply with the
conditions set out in 3.2 and 3.3.
3.2 Lateral buckling
a
b
R
eH
S <
a
= uniformly distributed compressive stress in the
direction of the stiffener axis in [N/mm
2
]
=
x
for longitudinal stiffeners
=
y
for transverse stiffeners
b
= bending stress in the stiffeners
= [N/mm
2
]
M
0
M
1
W
st
10
3
M
0
= bending moment due to deformation w of
stiffener
= [N mm] F
Ki
p
z
w
c
f
p
z
c
f
p
z
> 0
Section 3 - Design Principles F 3 - 10
M
1
= bending moment due to the lateral load p
for continuous longitudinal stiffeners:
= [N mm]
p b a
2
24 10
3
for transverse stiffeners:
= [N mm]
p a (n b)
2
c
s
8 10
3
p = lateral load in [kN/m] according to Section 4
F
Ki
= ideal buckling force of the stiffener in [N]
F
Kix
= for long. stiffeners
2
a
2
E I
x
10
4
F
Kiy
= for transv. stiffeners
2
(n b)
2
E I
y
10
4
I
x
, I
y
= moments of inertia of the longitudinal or
transverse stiffener including effective width
of plating according to 2.2 in [cm
4
]
I
x
b t
3
12 10
4
I
y
a t
3
12 10
4
p
z
= nominal lateral load of the stiffener due to
x
,
y
and in [N/mm
2
]
for longitudinal stiffeners:
p
zx
=
t
a
b
x1
b
a
2
2 c
y
y
2
1
for transverse stiffeners:
p
zy
=
t
a
a
2 c
x
x1
y
a
n b
2
1
A
y
a t
a
2
1
x1
= [N/mm
2
]
x
1
A
x
b t
a
c
x
, c
y
= factor taking into account the stresses vertical
to the stiffener's axis and distributed variable
along the stiffener's length
= 0,5 (1 + ) for 0 1
= for < 0
0,5
1
= edge stress ratio according to Table 3.3
A
x
,A
y
= sectional area of the longitudinal or transverse
stiffener respectively in [mm
2
]
1
= t R
eH
E
m
1
a
2
m
2
b
2
>
0
for longitudinal stiffeners:
: m
1
= 1,47 m
2
= 0,49
a
b
>
2,0
: m
1
= 1,96 m
2
= 0,37
a
b
< 2,0
for transverse stiffeners:
: m
1
= 0,37 m
2
=
a
n b
>
0,5
1,96
n
2
: m
1
= 0,49 m
2
=
a
n b
< 0,5
1,47
n
2
w = w
o
+ w
1
w
o
= assumed imperfection in [mm],
for long. stiffeners
a
250
>
w
ox
<
b
250
for transv. stiffeners
n b
250
>
w
oy
<
a
250
however w
o
mm <
10
Note
For stiffeners sniped at both ends w
o
must not be taken
less than the distance from the midpoint of plating to the
neutral axis of the profile including effective width of
plating.
w
1
= deformation of stiffener due to lateral load p
at midpoint of stiffener span in [mm]
In case of uniformly distributed load the following values
for w
1
may be used:
for longitudinal stiffeners:
w
1
=
p b a
4
384 10
7
E I
x
for transverse stiffeners:
w
1
=
5 a p (n b)
4
384 10
7
E I
y
c
2
s
c
f
= elastic support provided by the stiffener in
[N/mm
2
]
c
fx
= for long. stiffeners F
Kix
2
a
2
(1 c
px
)
c
px
=
1
1
0,91
12 10
4
I
x
t
3
b
1
c
x
c
x
= for a 2 b
a
2b
2b
a
2
= for a < 2 b 1
a
2b
2
2
Section 3 - Design Principles G 3 - 11
c
fy
= for transv. stiffeners c
s
F
Kiy
2
(n b)
2
(1 c
py
)
c
py
=
1
1
0,91
12 10
4
I
y
t
3
a
1
c
y
c
y
= for n b 2 a
n b
2a
2a
n b
2
= for n b < 2 a 1
n b
2a
2
2
c
s
= factor accounting for the boundary conditions
of the transverse stiffener
= 1,0 for simply supported stiffeners
= 2,0 for partially constraint stiffeners
W
st
= section modulus of stiffener (long. or transverse)
in [cm
3
] including effective width of plating
according to 2.2.
If no lateral load p is acting the bending stress
b
is to be
calculated at the midpoint of the stiffener span for the fibre
which results in the largest stress value. If lateral load p
is acting, the stress calculation is to be carried out for both
fibres of the stiffeners cross sectional area (if necessary
for the biaxial stress field at the plating side).
Note
Longitudinal and transverse stiffeners not subjected to
lateral load p have sufficient scantlings if their moments
of inertia I
x
and I
y
are not less than obtained by the following
formulae :
I
x
= [cm
4
]
p
zx
a
2
2
10
4
w
ox
h
w
R
eH
S
x
a
2
2
E
I
y
= [cm
4
]
p
zy
(n b)
2
2
10
4
w
oy
h
w
R
eH
S
y
(n b)
2
2
E
3.3 Torsional buckling
.1 Longitudinal stiffeners:
x
S
T
R
eH
<
1,0
T
= 1,0 for
T
<
0,2
= for
1
2
2
T
T
> 0,2
= 0,5 1 0,21 (
T
0,2 )
2
T
T
= reference degree of slenderness
T
=
R
eH
KiT
KiT
= [N/mm
2
]
E
I
P
2
I
10
2
a
2
0,385 I
T
For I
P
, I
T
, I
b
t
3
4 h
w
3 t
3
w
h
w
= web height [mm]
t
w
= web thickness [mm]
b
f
= flange breadth [mm]
t
f
= flange thickness [mm]
A
w
= web area h
w
t
w
A
f
= flange area b
f
t
f
.
.2 Transverse stiffeners
For transverse stiffeners loaded by compressive stresses
and which are not supported by longitudinal stiffeners, proof
is to be provided in accordance with 3.3.1 analogously.
G. Rigidity of Transverses and Girders
The moment of inertia of deck transverses and girders, is
not to be less than:
Section 3 - Design Principles H 3 - 12
I = c W [cm
4
]
c = 4,0 if both ends are simply supported
= 2,0 if one end is constrained
= 1,5 if both ends are constrained
W = section modulus of the structural member
considered in [cm
3
]
= unsupported span of the structural member
considered in [m]
H. Structural Details
1. Longitudinal members
1.1 All longitudinal members taken into account for
calculating the midship section modulus are to extend over
the required length amidships and are to be tapered
gradually to the required end scantlings (see also Section
5, C.1).
Table 3.5 Formulas for the calculation of moments of inertia I
P
, I
T
, and I
Profile I
P
I
T
I
flat bar
h
3
w
t
w
3 10
4
h
w
t
3
w
3 10
4
1 - 0,63
t
w
h
w
h
3
w
t
3
w
36 10
6
profile with
bulb or
flange
A
w
h
2
w
3
A
f
e
2
f
10
4
h
w
t
3
w
3 10
4
1 - 0,63
t
w
h
w
+
b
f
t
3
f
3 10
4
1 - 0,63
t
f
b
f
for bulb and angle profiles:
A
f
e
2
f
b
2
f
12 10
6
A
f
2,6 A
w
A
f
A
w
for T - profiles:
b
3
f
t
f
e
2
f
12 10
6
1.2 Abrupt discontinuities of strength of longitudinal
members are to be avoided as far as practicable. Where
longitudinal members having different scantlings are
connected with each other, smooth transitions are to be
provided.
Special attention in this respect is to be paid to the
construction of continuous longitudinal hatch coamings
forming part of the longitudinal hull structure.
1.3 At the ends of longitudinal bulkheads or continuous
longitudinal walls suitable scarphing brackets are to be
provided.
2. Transverses and girders
2.1 Where transverses and girders fitted in the same
plane are connected to each other, major discontinuities
of strength shall be avoided. The web depth of the smaller
girder shall, in general, not be less than 60% of the web
depth of the greater one.
2.2 The taper between face plates with different
dimensions is to be gradual. In general the taper shall not
exceed 1: 3. At intersections the forces acting in the face
plates are to be properly transmitted.
2.3 For transmitting the acting forces the face plates
are to be supported at their knuckles. For supporting the
face plates of cantilevers, see Fig. 3.4.
Fig. 3.4 Support of face plates of cantilevers
2.4 Upon special approval the stiffeners at the knuckles
may be omitted if the following condition is complied with:
a
<
p
b
e
b
f
[N/mm
2
]
a
= actual stress in the face plate at the knuckle in
[N/mm
2
]
p
= permissible stress in the face plate in [N/mm
2
]
b
f
= breadth of face plate in [mm]
b
e
= effective breadth of face plate:
Section 3 - Design Principles H 3 - 13
b
e
= t
w
n
1
t
f
c (b t
f
) [mm]
t
w
= web thickness in [mm]
t
f
= face plate thickness in [mm]
b =
1
n
1
(b
f
- t
w
) [mm]
c =
1
( b - t
f
)
2
( R t
f
)
- n
2
n
3
t
f
2
R
c
max
= 1
2 = knuckle angle in [ ], see Fig. 3.5
max
= 45
R = radius of rounded face plates
= t
f
for knuckled face plates
n
1
= 1 for un-symmetrical face plates (face plate
at one side only)
= 2 for symmetrical face plates
n
2
= 0 for free face plates
= 1,0
b t
f
2
R t
f
for face plates of multi-web girders
n
3
= 3 if no radial stiffener is fitted
= 3000 if two or more radial stiffeners are fitted
or if one knuckle stiffener is fitted
according Fig. 3.5.
Fig. 3.5 Typical stiffeners of rounded of
knuckled face plates
n
3
=
d
t
f
8
4
if one stiffener is fitted according to Fig. 3.5
3 n
3
3000
d = distance of the stiffener from the knuckle [mm]
For proof of fatigue strength of the weld seam in the
knuckle, the stress concentration factor K
S
(angle 2
according to Fig. 3.5 < 35) related to the stress
a
in the
face plate of thickness t
f
may be estimated as follows and
may be evaluated with case 5 of Table 20.3:
K
S
=
t
f
t
f1
1
6 n
4
1
t
f
t
f1
2
tan
t
f1
R
2
n
4
= 7,143 for > 8
d
t
f
= for 8 > 1,35
d
t
f
0,51
4
d
t
f
d
t
f
= 0,5 + 0,125 for 1,35 0,25
d
t
f
d
t
f
The welding seam has to be shaped according to Fig. 3.6.
Scantlings of stiffeners (guidance) :
thickness: t
b
=
a
p
t
f
2 sin
height: h = 1,5 b.
2.5 For preventing the face plates from tripping
adequately spaced stiffeners or tripping brackets are to be
provided. The spacing of these tripping elements shall not
exceed 12 b
f
.
2.6 The webs are to be stiffened to prevent buckling
(see also F.).
2.7 The location of lightening holes shall be such that
the distance from hole edge to face plate is not to be less
than 0,3 x web depth.
2.8 In way of high shear stresses lightening holes in
the webs are to be avoided as far as possible.
3. Knuckles (general)
Flanged structural elements transmitting forces
perpendicular to the knuckle, are to be adequately supported
at their knuckle, i.e. the knuckles of the inner bottom are
to be located above floors, longitudinal girders or bulkheads.
If longitudinal structures, such as longitudinal bulkheads
or decks, include a knuckle which is formed by two butt-
welded plates, the knuckle is to be supported in the vicinity
of the joint rather than at the exact location of the joint.
The minimum distance d to the supporting structure is to
be at least
d = 25 +
t
f
2
but not more than 50 mm, see Fig. 3.6.
Section 3 - Design Principles J 3 - 14
Fig. 3.6 Welding and supporting of knuckles
On bulk carriers at knuckles between inner bottom and tank
side slopes in way of floors the welding cutouts must be
closed by collar plates or insert plates, see Fig. 3.7.
In both cases a full penetration weld is required to inner
bottom and bottom girder.
Fig. 3.7 Knuckles of the double bottom
J. Evaluation of Notch Stresses
The notch stress
K
evaluated for linear-elastic material
behaviour at free plate edges, e.g. at hatch corners, openings
in decks, walls, girders etc., should, in general, fulfill the
following criterion:
K
<
f R
eH
f = 1,1 for normal strength hull structural steel
= 1,0 for higher strength hull structural steel
with R
eH
= 265 N/mm
2
= 0,9 for higher strength hull structural steel
with R
eH
= 315 N/mm
2
= 0,8 for higher strength hull structural steel
with R
eH
= 355 N/mm
2
.
= 0,73 for higher strength hull structural steel
with R
eH
= 390 N/mm
2
If plate edges are free of notches and corners are
rounded-off, a 20 % higher notch stress
K
may be
permitted.
A further increase of stresses may be permitted on the basis
of a fatigue strength analysis as per Section 20.
Fig.3.8 Notch faktor K
t
for rounded openings
Section 3 - Design Principles J 3 - 15
Fig. 3.9 Notch factor K
t
for rectangular openings with rounded corners at uniaxial state of stresses (left) and at
multiaxial state of stresses (right)
Fig. 3.10 Parameters m and c to determine the notch factors of rectangular openings loaded by superimposed
longitudinal and shear stresses
For some types of openings the notch factors are given in
Figs. 3.8 and 3.9.
They apply to stress conditions with uniaxial or biaxial
normal stresses.
In case of superimposed stresses due to longitudinal and
shear loads, the maximum notch stress
Kmax
of rectangular
openings with rounded corners can approximately be
calculated as follows:
Kmax
= + + K
tv
. .
1
2
1
2
3
For
1
= tensile stress
= + K
tv
. .
1
2
1
2
3
For
1
= compressive stress
K
tv
= notch factor for equivalent stress
= m c . +
m, c = parameters according to Fig.3.10
, a = length and height of opening
1
= shear stress related to gross area of section
1
= longitudinal stress (in direction of length of
opening) related to gross area of section
r = radius of rounded corner
= ratio of smaller length to radius of corner ( /r
or a/r)
min
= 3
Note
Because the notch factor and the equivalent stress are
always positive, the sign of 1 governs the most
unfavourable superposition of the stress components in
any of the four corners. A load consisting of shear only,
results in notch stresses of equal size with two positive and
two negative values in the opposite corners.
Section 3 - Design Principles L 3 - 16
An exact evaluation of notch stresses is possible by means
of finite element calculations. For fatigue investigations
the stress increase due to geometry of cut-outs has to be
considered, see Section 20, C., Table.20.3.
Note
These notch factors can only be used for girders with
multiple openings if there is no correlation between the
different openings regarding deformations and stresses.
K. Corrosion Allowances and Corrosion Control
1. Corrosion allowance
1.1 The scantling requirements of the subsequent
Sections imply the following general corrosion allowances
t
K
:
t
K
= 1,5 mm for t' 10 mm <
h
Q
f
t
f
c W
y
W
z
b
2
1
- b
2
2
[N/mm
2
]
Q = load on section parallel to its web within the
unsupported span
f
in [kN]
= p a
f
[kN] in case of uniformly distributed
load p [kN/m
2
]
f
= unsupported span of flange in [m]
t
f
, b
l
, b
2
= flange dimensions in [ mm ] as shown in
Fig. 3.10.
b
1
b
2
>
ges
=
Q
f
1000
12 W
y
1
12 t
f
(b
1
2
b
2
2
)
1000 c W
z
Therefore the required section modulus W
y
according to
A.2. must be increased by the factor k
sp
depending on the
type of profile and the boundary conditions expressed by c.
ges
= [N/mm
2
]
Q
f
1000
12 W
y
k
sp
For k
sp
at least the values in Table 3.7 are to be taken.
Table 3.7 Increase factor K
sp
Type of Profile k
sp
Flat bars and symmetric T-profiles 1,00
Bulb profiles 1,03
Unsymmetric T profiles
b
2
b
1
0,5
1,05
Rolled angels (L-profiles) 1,15