Building and Environment 42 (2007) 26372644

Some of the properties of woodplastic composites

Andrea Wechsler
a,
, Salim Hiziroglu
b
a
Universidad Bio-Bio, Wood Composite Material and Quality, Control Laboratory, Concepcion, Chile
b
Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-6013, USA
Received 3 February 2006; accepted 27 June 2006
Abstract
In this study some of the important properties of experimentally manufactured woodplastic composites (WPC) were determined.
Specimen having 60% and 80% particle and ber of radiata pine (Pinus radiata ) were mixed with polypropylene (plastic) and four
different additives, namely Structor TR 016 which is coupling agent, CIBA anti-microbial agent (IRGAGUARD F3510) as fungicide,
CIBA UV lter coating (TINUVIN 123S), CIBA blue pigment (Irgalite), and their combinations. Based on the initial nding of this
work static bending properties of the samples enhanced as above chemicals were added into both particle and ber-based specimens.
Thickness swelling of the samples were also improved with having additives in the panels. Micrographs taken on scanning electron
microscope (SEM) revealed that coupling agent and pigment resulted in more homogeneous mixture of wood and plastic together. Two
surface roughness parameters average roughness (R
a
) and maximum roughness (R
max
) used to evaluate surface characteristics of the
samples showed that particle based samples had rougher surface characteristics than those of ber based ones. No signicant inuence of
chemicals added in the samples was found on surface roughness values of the samples manufactured from particle and ber of radiata
pine.
r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Radiata pine; Particle; Fiber; Woodplastic composites; Coupling agent
1. Introduction
Woodplastic composites (WPC) are widely used in
USA, the most common type of such panels are produced
by mixing wood our and plastics to produce a material
that can be processed similar to 100% plastic-based
products [1-4]. Some of the major advantages of WPC
include their resistance against biological deterioration for
outdoor applications where untreated timber products are
not suitable. The sustainability of this technology becomes
more attractive when the low cost and high availability of
ne particles of wood waste is considered.
These composites are transformed by extrusion processes
to obtain structural building applications including,
proles, sheathings, decking, roof tiles, and window trims,
with improved thermal and creep performance compared
with unlled plastics [5-7]. However, it is necessary to
improve their physical and mechanical properties as well as
appearance of such products to have a strong market share
in wood composite panel industry. There are several ways
to improve overall properties of WPC panels, namely using
right size of raw material, optimum mixture and prepara-
tion of the elements in the product, and adding small
amounts of additives such as coupling agents, pigments,
antimicrobials or light stabilizers during their production
[8,9,10].
Most of the physical and mechanical properties WPC
depend on mainly on the interaction developed between
wood and the thermoplastic material. One way to improve
this interaction is incorporating a coupling agent as
additive. In general, the additives help the compatibility
between hydrophilic wood and hydrophobic plastic allow-
ing the formation of single-phase composite. Wood-plastic
composites also have problems when they are exposed to
UV rays, their natural wood or pigmented color may tend
to fade away. Therefore, depending on the nal applica-
tion, UV lters have to be added to stabilize their colors for
a longer time. When designing a commercial composite, the
ARTICLE IN PRESS
www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv
0360-1323/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.018

Corresponding author.
effect of particle size is one of the most important
parameters affecting overall products properties. The use
of optimum size of particle might improve the mechanical
properties of a composite, but the incorporation of a
preservative should also be considered if it will be used for
an application where biological resistance of this product is
important [10].
Radiata pine is one of the main species having with an
annual production of 27 million of cubic meters in Chile. It
excellent prime source for pulp and paper manufacture in
Chile and many other countries. Additional products from
radiate pine include interiors and exteriors panels, furniture
manufacture, trimming, and structural lumber. Although
research and technological development in the area of
WPC in Chile has been increasing but there is still no
comprehensive work has been done in this area [1].
Therefore, the main objective of this work is to investigate
some of the properties of WCP panels manufactured from
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 1
List of the chemicals used as additive in panel manufacture
Material Abbreviation Description Source
Radiata pine ber Wf Subproduct of Radiata pine furniture manufacture
process. 50 mesh
Catem, Concepcion Chile (wood high technology
center)
Radiata pine particles Wp Subproduct of Radiata pine furniture manufacture
process. 1050 mesh
Catem, Concepcion Chile (wood high technology
center)
Polypropylene Pp Virgin polypropylene pallets Petroquim, Polypropylene producer, Talcahuano,
Chile
Eastmann Epolene maleated polyethylene
(polypropylene)E 43
E 43 Maleated polypropylene wax Eastman chemical companies, USA
Struktol TR016 Tr 016 A blend of fatty acid metal soap and an amide. Struktol chemical companies, USA
CIBA Antimicrobial agent IRGAGUARD F3510 Irg Contains a broad-spectrum fungicide that is highly
effective against mold, rot, blight and stain.
Ciba chemical company
CIBA Plastic UV lter TINUVIN 123S Tn UV plastic ber. Liquid hindered amine light
stabilizer (HALS) based on aminoether
functionality, absorbed into highly porous
polypropylene.
Ciba chemical company
CIBA Wood UV lter lignostab Lg Lignin stabilizer for color stabilization of natural,
tinted or stained wood and for the durability
improvement of wood substrates coated with clear
and transparent pigmented nishes.
Ciba chemical company
Ciba irgalite blue pigment Bp Concentrate powder pigment Ciba chemical company
Table 2
Ratio of the raw material and additive agents used for panel manufacture
Panel type Fiber-based panels Particle-based panels
60/80 ratio 80/20 ratio 60/40 ratio 80/20 ratio
A 60% wood ber 80% wood ber 60% wood particles 80% wood particles
40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene 40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene
B 60% wood ber 80% wood ber 60% pine wood 80% wood particles
40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene 40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene
2% TR016 2%TR016 2% TR016 2% TR016
C 60% wood ber 80% wood ber 60% wood particles 80% wood particles
40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene 40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene
2% TR016 2% TR016 2% TR016 2% TR016
6% IRG 6% IRG 6% IRG 6% IRG
D 60% wood ber 80% wood ber 60% wood particles 80% wood particles
40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene 40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene
2% TR016 2%TR016 2% TR016 2% TR016
1.2% LG 1.6% LG 1.2% LG 1.6% LG
1.2%TN 0.6% TN 1.2% TN 0.6% TN
E 60% wood ber 80% wood ber 60% wood particles 80% wood particles
40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene 40% polypropylene 20% polypropylene
2% TR016 2%TR016 2% TR016 2% TR016
0.05 g BP 0.05 g BP 0.05 g BP 0.05 g BP
A. Wechsler, S. Hiziroglu / Building and Environment 42 (2007) 26372644 2638
radiata pine furnish and plastic which is virgin polypropy-
lene with addition of various chemicals to provide an initial
data in this area.
2. Materials and methods
Commercially produced polypropylene in the form of
pallets and wood material of radiate pine (Pinus radiate)
were used to manufacture experimental panels. Wood
particles were manually screened on a sieve and classied
into two portions, 10 mesh particles and 50 mesh ber.
Four different types of chemicals Structor TR 016 which is
coupling agent, CIBA anti-microbial agent (IRGA-
GUARD F3510) as fungicide, CIBA UV coating (TINU-
VIN 123S) and CIBA blue pigment (Irgalite) were added
into the samples. Tables 1 and 2 show the list of the
chemicals and their percentages used for panel production.
Wood particles and bers were dried in an oven before they
were mixed with polypropylene. First plastic material was
put into mixer rotating at 75 rpm having a temperature of
165 1C for 2 min followed by adding the chemicals for each
type of material. In the next step particles or bers were
added into the mixture and rotated for another 3 min
completing a total mixing time to 5 min. Fig. 1 illustrates
the mixer used for panel manufacture. Mixed samples then
were pressed in a hot press with a 20 by 20 cm platen
capacity. Each batch of sample was pressed using a
temperature of 165 1C and a pressure of 40 bar for 5 min.
The press was cooled off while the samples were still under
compression before they were removed and conditioned in
a climate chamber with a temperature of 20 1C and a
relative humidity of 55%. Average target thickness of the
panel was 2.5 mm. Modulus of elasticity (MOE) and
modulus of rupture (MOR) of the samples were deter-
mined on a Comten Testing Unit equipped with a load cell
with a capacity of 2000 kg Figs. 2A,B and 3 show some of
ber- and particle-based samples and bending test set-up,
respectively.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 1. Rotating mixer.
Fig. 2. (A) Various types of ber-based samples. (B) Various types of
particle-based samples.
A. Wechsler, S. Hiziroglu / Building and Environment 42 (2007) 26372644 2639
Four samples with a size of 5 cm5 cm were used to
determined thickness swelling (TS) of the panels. The
thickness of each sample was measured at four points.
Then samples were submerged in distilled water for 2 and
22 h before thickness measurements were taken from the
same location to calculate swelling values. Surface rough-
ness of the samples was also determined using a stylus-type
prolometer. A portable stylus equipment consisted of a
main unit and pick-up which had a skid-type diamond
stylus with 5 mm tip radius and 901 tip angle (Fig. 4). The
vertical displacement of the stylus is converted into
electrical signal and digital information. Different rough-
ness parameters such as average roughness and maximum
roughness can be calculated from that digital information
and prole of the surface can be developed as shown in
Fig. 5. Description of these parameters is discussed in
previous studies [11,12]. Six random measurements were
taken from the surface of tested bending samples to
evaluate surface characteristics of the panels. Micrographs
were also taken from the cross section of the samples with
3 mm3 mm face surface area to evaluate effect of
woodplastic interaction on both particle and ber-based
samples. Figs. 9AD show typical micrographs taken from
the samples.
3. Results
Mechanical and physical properties of the panels
manufactured from combination of plastic and wood
material and ber with addition of various types of
chemicals are shown in Table 3. Average MOE value of
the samples containing 60% and 80% wood ber without
having any chemicals was found 2109 MPa (Fig. 6). When
these samples were added coupling agent bending proper-
ties of the samples increased to 3560 MPa which is 38%
higher than that of the specimen made without any
chemicals. Panel types C, D, and E having chemicals listed
in Table 1 also improved MOE values of the samples as
compared to those of made with combination of plastic
and wood ber. However, panel type D which was added
UV lter in the form of akes and pallets showed only
11.6% lower MOE than the samples with fungicides added.
This could be due to non-homogeneous mixture of three
elements, namely wood ber, plastic, and UV lter. Also it
seems that using 1.2 % of UV lter would be considered
quite high and may be responsible for such nding. Using
less amount of the UV lter agent could be more feasible
approach to eliminate negative effect of the lter on MOE
values of the samples. Overall bending properties of the
samples are comparable to those found in two previous
studies [4,5]. In the case of panel type C bending
characteristics of the samples were not substantially
reduced due to fungicide content. Fiber-based panels
manufactured with coupling agent pigment had the lowest
MOE values which may be due to chemical reaction
between coupling agent and pigment reducing bonding
between wood and plastic components. Modulus of
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 3. Static bending test set-up.
A. Wechsler, S. Hiziroglu / Building and Environment 42 (2007) 26372644 2640
elasticity of the samples made using wood particles also
had similar trend to above panels. Fiber-based panels had
only 3.3% higher MOE values than that of particle-based
samples at 95% condence level. However, ber-based
panels containing coupling agent had signicantly higher
MOE than those of specimens manufactured from particle-
based using the same chemicals as can be seen in Table 3
and Fig. 6. This nding may suggest homogeneous mix of
ber and plastic along with coupling agent resulted in a
better bounding between the elements in contrast to
particle types of panels which can also be seen in
Figs. 9A and B which were taken from the cross section
of the samples using SEM. Once chemicals, fungicides, UV
lter, and pigments were added into particle-based panels
their MOE characteristics also enhanced and become
similar to the values of the samples manufactured from
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 4. Roughness measurement prolometer.
Fig. 5. Typical surface proles of the samples.
A. Wechsler, S. Hiziroglu / Building and Environment 42 (2007) 26372644 2641
ber-based samples. Overall MOR values of both particle
and ber types of sample followed similar trend of MOE
values. TS of the samples as a result of 2- and 24-hr water
soaking test are presented in Table 3 and Fig. 7. The
highest TS value was 18.6% for the wood ber base panels
without addition of any chemicals for 24-hr water soaking.
It appears that when coupling agent, UV lter, and
fungicides had relatively positive inuence on TS on
ber-based samples as can be seen on Fig. 7. When
coupling agent was added into the samples their TS was
reduced more than half in the case of ber-based panels.
Dimensional stability of the ber-based panel types B, C,
D, and E did not show any signicant difference at 95%
condence level. Overall TS characteristics of the particle-
based samples had lower values than those of ber type of
the samples. Separation between bers as a result of water
soaking for 24 hr was observed on the micrographs taken
on SEM as illustrated in Figs. 9C and D.
Based on the roughness parameters obtained from the
surface of the samples ber-based panels resulted in
signicantly different R
a
and R
max
values than those of
particle-based ones. For example particle type samples
made without having any chemical had 5.84 mm R
a
which
is 3 times higher than ber-based panels as illustrated in
Fig. 8. In a previous study it was determined that
commercially produced berboard panels had much
smoother surface than particleboard panels [11]. Even if
very ne particles are used on the face layer of the
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 6. Average modulus of elasticity of the samples made from 60% and 80% bers and particles.
Table 3
Mechanical and physical test results
Panel type Static bending (MPa) Water absorption (%) Thickness swelling (%) Surface roughness (mm)
Fiber-based samples
MOE MOR 2 h 24 h 2 h 24 h R
a
R
max
A 2,109 11.80 3.21 8.33 11.3 18.6 1.98 16.71
B 3,560 18.74 5.73 12.84 5.2 13.3 4.05 33.84
C 3,208 14.53 5.11 6.53 5.4 8.9 4.48 33.94
D 2,778 14.28 4.79 10.96 5.8 11.8 4.09 32.11
E 2,155 12.74 5.22 9.49 3.9 11.0 3.54 28.35
Particle-based samples
A 2,058 12.01 4.76 8.82 5.5 12.5 5.84 41.68
B 3,034 13.90 6.67 14.71 6.7 12.2 6.61 66.43
C 3,254 14.60 4.07 7.50 3.8 5.9 6.70 49.07
D 2,656 14.10 7.19 15.36 7.9 13.4 8.11 50.18
E 2,191 12.89 7.46 14.61 7.5 12.1 6.96 57.78
A. Wechsler, S. Hiziroglu / Building and Environment 42 (2007) 26372644 2642
particleboard pits and falls due to larger geometry of
particle than bers resulted in rougher surface character-
istics [11]. This concept was also reected in particle, ber-
and plastic-based experimental panels made in this study.
It appears that as coupling agent, UV lter, and pigment
were added into both types of panels their surface
roughness increased due to not having well-developed
contact between wood-based material and plastic on the
surface layers. (Fig. 9, Table 3).
4. Conclusion
In this work, particles and bers from radiata pine along
with different chemicals as additives used to make
experimental WPC panels. In the light of the preliminary
results of this study both physical and chemical properties
of the samples were improved with addition of four
types of chemicals into the panels. It seems that using less
than 1.2% anti-microbial agent as fungicide would yield
better properties of the samples. Initial data from the study
would assist to develop WPC panel manufacture in Chile.
In further studies, manufacturing of the panels by
extrusion method with more than two particle and
ber percentages would be desirable to have a better
understanding of panel properties. Also linear expansion,
tension parallel to the surface of the samples should be
tested to have more comprehensive information about the
samples.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 8. Average roughness (R
a
) roughness values of the samples.
Fig. 7. Thickness swelling for 2hr water soaking test.
A. Wechsler, S. Hiziroglu / Building and Environment 42 (2007) 26372644 2643
References
[1] Ballerini A. Fondef Project N D04I1185: Development of chemical
additives from tall oil to improve the compatibility of woodplastic
composites. /http://www.conicyt.cl/bases/fondef/PROYECTO/04/I/
D04I1185.HTMLS; 2004.
[2] Charrier MP. Ploymeric materials and processing: plastics, elasto-
mers, and composites. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
[3] Groom L, Shaler SM, Mott L. Mechanical properties of lignocellu-
losic bers. In: Proceedings of woodber plastic composites. Forest
Products Society, Masidon, Wisconsin; 1996. p. 3340.
[4] Simonsen J. The mechanical properties of woodberplastic compo-
sites: theoretical vs. experimental. In: Proceedings of woodber
plastic composites, Forest Products Society, Proceedings No. 7293.
p. 4755; 1995.
[5] English BW, Falk P. Factors that affect the application of
woodberplastic composites. Woodber Plastic Composites. Forest
Products Society, Proceedings 1995;7293:18994.
[6] Tangram Technology.Woodplastic composites a technical review of
materials, processes and applications. Tangram technology Ltd.
Forest Products Laboratory, WoodPlastic Composites, Tech line;
2002, COM-1 01/04.
[7] Verhey AS, Laks EP. Wood particle size affects the decay resistance
of woodber/thermoplastic composites. Forest Products Journal
2002;52(11/12):7881.
[8] Nielsen LE, Landen RF. Mechanical properties of polymer and
composites. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1994.
[9] Plueddemann EP. Silane coupling agents. New York, NY: Plenum
Press; 1982 p:128.
[10] Verhey AS, Lacks EP, Richter LD, Keranen DE, Larkin MG. Use of
eld takes to evaluate the decay resistance of wood ber
thermoplastic composites. Forest Products Journal 2002;53(5):6774.
[11] Hiziroglu S. Surface roughness analysis: stylus method. Forest
Product Journal; 1996.
[12] Mummery L. Surface texture analysis. The handbook. Hommel-
werke. Mulhausen, Germany; 1993. 106p.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Fig. 9. Photographs taken from the cross-section of the samples on scanning electron microscope. (A). Sample with 60% particle without any additives.
(B). Sample with 60% particle with pigment and coupling agent. (C). Dry sample with 60% ber with no additive. (D). Water soaked sample with 60%
ber with no additive.
A. Wechsler, S. Hiziroglu / Building and Environment 42 (2007) 26372644 2644