Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. In the given scenario, sales from the existing agreement should not be included in the
capital budgeting analysis. The reason being is that Blades would have these sales with
or without the subsidiary in Thailand. The cost savings for the pairs not sourced from
Thailand should be included because these sales would not happen if Blades continued
to import from Thailand. Finally, the sales resulting from a renewed agreement should be
included in the capital budgeting analysis because this revenue is incremental to creating
2. See spreadsheet. Blades should establish the subsidiary in Thailand under the given
conditions. The capital budgeting analysis shows a positive NPV if Blades renews the
3. See spreadsheet. The capital budgeting analysis indicates that Blades should establish a
subsidiary and not renew its agreement. The NPV was $8,746,688
4. See spreadsheet. The salvage value is not that critical. The capital budgeting analysis in
3 and question 4), even if Blades salvage value is reduced to 0 (Blades does not sell the
5. See spreadsheet. The capital budgeting analysis shows a positive NPV of $5,620,315 for
the worst case scenario. Therefore, Blades should establish the subsidiary even if baht
Capital
Budgeting
Analysis
PROBLE
Year 0
M#2
Demand Entertain
ment
Products
Year 1
Year 2
Price per
unit - baht
Revenue
from
agreement
Other
retailers
Price per
unit - baht
Revenue
from other
retailers
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
180
180
180
180
180
180
4.594
4.594
4.594
4.594
4.594
4.594
120
120
220
220
220
220
220
5.6
6.272
7.025
7.868
8.812
9.869
Total
revenue
Variable
cost per
unit
Total
variable
cost
Less: cost
savings
32,400,00
0
Other
fixed
expenses
3.5
3.92
4.39
4.917
5.507
6.168
6.908
Depreciati
on
Total
expenses
EBT of
susidiary
Host
governme
nt tax
(25%)
After tax
earnings
of
subsidiary
NCF to
subsidiary
Baht
remitted
by
susidiary
Witholdin
g tax on
remitted
funds
(10%)
Baht
remitted
after
witholding
taxes
Salvage
value
Exchange
rate - baht
0.02300
CF to
parent
PV of
parent CF
(25%
discount
rate)
Initial
12,650,00
investment
0
by parent
0.02254
0.02209
0.02165
0.02121
0.02079
0.02037
0.01997
952.343
552.37
Cumulativ
e PV
PROBLE
Year 0
M#3
Demand Entertain
ment
Products
Year 1
Year 2
Price per
unit - baht
Revenue
from
agreement
Other
retailers
Price per
unit - baht
Revenue
from other
retailers
Year 3
Year 4
-398.695
Year 5
553.648 1,106,018
Year 6
Year 7
5.6
6.272
7.025
7.868
8.812
9.869
120
120
220
220
220
220
220
5.6
6.272
7.025
7.868
8.812
9.869
Total
revenue
Variable
cost per
unit
Total
variable
cost
Less: cost
savings
32,400,00
0
Other
fixed
expenses
Depreciati
on
Total
expenses
EBT of
susidiary
3.5
3.92
4.39
4.917
5.507
6.168
6.908
Host
governme
nt tax
(25%)
After tax
earnings
of
subsidiary
NCF to
subsidiary
Baht
remitted
by
susidiary
Witholdin
g tax on
remitted
funds
(10%)
Baht
remitted
after
witholding
taxes
Salvage
value
Exchange
rate - baht
0.02300
CF to
parent
PV of
parent CF
(25%
discount
rate)
0.02254
0.02209
0.02165
0.02121
0.02079
0.02037
0.01997
Initial
12,650,00
investment
0
by parent
Cumulativ
e PV
PROBLE
Year 0
M#4
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Demand Entertain
ment
Products
Price per
unit - baht
5.6
6.272
7.025
7.868
8.812
9.869
Revenue
from
agreement
Other
retailers
Price per
unit - baht
Revenue
from other
retailers
120
120
220
220
220
220
220
5.6
6.272
7.025
7.868
8.812
9.869
Total
revenue
Variable
cost per
unit
Total
variable
cost
Less: cost
savings
32,400,00
0
Other
fixed
expenses
Depreciati
on
Total
expenses
EBT of
susidiary
Host
governme
nt tax
(25%)
After tax
earnings
of
subsidiary
3.5
3.92
4.39
4.917
5.507
6.168
6.908
NCF to
subsidiary
Baht
remitted
by
susidiary
Witholdin
g tax on
remitted
funds
(10%)
Baht
remitted
after
witholding
taxes
Salvage
value
Exchange
rate - baht
0.02300
CF to
parent
PV of
parent CF
(25%
discount
rate)
0.02254
0.02209
0.02165
0.02121
0.02079
0.02037
0.01997
Initial
12,650,00
investment
0
by parent
Cumulativ
e PV
PROBLE
Year 0
M#5
Demand Entertain
ment
Products
Price per
unit - baht
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
5.6
6.272
7.025
7.868
8.812
9.869
Revenue
from
agreement
Other
retailers
Price per
unit - baht
Revenue
from other
retailers
120
120
220
220
220
220
220
5.6
6.272
7.025
7.868
8.812
9.869
Total
revenue
Variable
cost per
unit
Total
variable
cost
Less: cost
savings
32,400,00
0
Other
fixed
expenses
Depreciati
on
Total
expenses
EBT of
susidiary
Host
governme
nt tax
(25%)
3.5
3.92
4.39
4.917
5.507
6.168
6.908
After tax
earnings
of
subsidiary
NCF to
subsidiary
Baht
remitted
by
susidiary
Witholdin
g tax on
remitted
funds
(10%)
Baht
remitted
after
witholding
taxes
Salvage
value
Exchange
rate - baht
0.02300
CF to
parent
PV of
parent CF
(25%
discount
rate)
0.02185
0.02076
0.01972
0.01873
0.01780
0.01691
0.01606
Initial
12,650,00
investment
0
by parent
Cumulativ
e PV
118.81 1,543,989
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
180
180
180
4.594
4.594
4.594
220
220
11.053
12.38
13.865
8.666
9.706
58,836,40
-5,826,024 78,247,94
7
7
88,836,40 24,173,97
48,247,94
7
6
7
88,836,40 24,173,97
48,247,94
7
6
7
79,952,76 21,756,57
43,423,15
6
8
2
650,000,0
00
0.01957
0.01918
0.01879
1,564,480
417.208
11,399,20
1
262.476
55.997 1,223,980
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
11.053
12.38
13.865
220
220
11.053
12.38
13.865
8.666
9.706
0.01918
0.01879
10,144,65 23,334,79
9
4
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
11.053
12.38
13.865
220
220
11.053
12.38
13.865
8.666
9.706
0
0.01957
9,256,735
0.01918
0.01879
10,144,65 11,119,55
9
6
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
11.053
12.38
13.865
220
220
11.053
12.38
13.865
8.666
9.706
0.01450
0.01377
7,218,352 7,668,585
17,099,33
7
Case 9
1. There are several ways Blades can benefit. Blades generates baht-denominated cash
inflows and then converts them to U.S. dollars. Forecasting the exchange rate may allow
Blades to make hedging decisions. Furthermore, it is mentioned that Blades may establish
a subsidiary in Thailand. If this was to happen, profits earned by this subsidiary will be
in baht. These earnings will then be sent back to the parent or reinvested in Thailand. In
both scenarios forecasting exchange rate is vital for companys future.
2. A market-based forecast is the easiest to use because it is based on either spot rate or the
forward rate. In this case it would be better to use forward rates.
3. The forward rates would yield a better market-based forecast. It is said that the available
forward rates currently exhibit a large discount, which implies higher interest rate, which
then implies higher inflation. Higher inflation is associated with a downward pressure on
the baht, which is a valid forecast. Using the present spot rate to forecast future spot rate
would mean that the value of the baht would not fluctuate, which is not likely to happen.
4.
market-based forecast By using the forward rate market-based forecast it is shown that baht is expected to
change by -8.70 percent. The value of the baht in 90 days according to this forecast will
-0.08696
be $0.021.
5. Weekly accuracy of technical forecast indicates market inefficiency for the baht-dollar
exchange rates. Technical forecasting involves the use of historical exchange rate data to
predict future rates and mostly apply to very shot-term periods such as one day. Given
the conditions Thailand is in, examination of past movements will not be useful for
indicating future rates.
6.
fundamental forecast The expected change using the fundamental forecast is -6.85 percent.
-0.0685
forecasted value of the baht The forecasted value of the baht using the expected value as the forecast is $.0214.
absolute error- technical forecasting absolute error- fundamental forecasting absolute error- market-based forecasting 0.021425
-0.01727
-0.02614
-0.04545
The absolute forecast errors are as follows: technical forecasting 1.73%; fundamental
forecasting 2.61%; and the market-based forecast 4.54%. Observing given forecasting
techniques and their absolute errors the conclusion arises that the most accurate technique
is the technical forecasting.
7. It will not. As mentioned earlier, technical forecasting involves the use of historical
exchange rate data to predict future rates. Examination of past movements will
most likely not be as useful for indicating future rates in Thailand. There are a lot of
uncertainties when it comes to exchange rates in this country. There is a high volatility
of the baht-dollar exchange rate. In addition, Thai economy is experiencing unfavorable
conditions that will have an affect on exchange rates.