Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Rev.
H.I.KIM DRAWN
J.B.SEO CHECKED
S.H.JU APPROVED
EMPLOYER
Kenya Electricity Generating Company Ltd. Stima Plaza, Phase III Kolobot Road, P.O. Box 47936 00100 GPO, Nairobi, KENYA Tel : +254 20 3666000 Fax : +254 20 248848
EMPLOYERS REPRESENTATIVE
Sinclair Knight Merz Ltd Carlaw Park Commercial, 12-16 Nicholls Lane, Parnell, Auckland, NEW ZEALAND Tel : +64 9 928 5500 Fax : +64 9 928 5501
EPC CONTRACTOR
Hyundai Engineering Co., Ltd. Hyundai 41 Tower, Mok 1-dong, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, KOREA Tel : +82 2 2166 8573 Fax : +82 2 2643 0773
DRAWN BY H.I.KIM DESIGN BY E.J.LIM CHECK BY J.B.SEO APPROVED BY S.H.JU
DRAWING SCALE
Toyota Tsusho Corporation 3-13, Konan 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN Tel : +81 3 4306 3200 Fax : +81 3 4306 8908
DATE 18 APR 2012 DATE 18 APR 2012 DATE 18 APR 2012 DATE 18 APR 2012
PROJECT
NONE
ZP00700-B2CE-ECG-CLC-0001
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CONTENTS REF.
GENERAL General Design Code & Reference Design Method Design Data
2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 3.0 40 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.0
GEOTECHNICAL PILE CAPACITY BH-01 BH-02 BH-04 BH-05 BH-06 BH-08 BH-09 BH-10 BH-11 DBH-01 DBH-02 SUMMARY STRUCTURAL PILE DESIGN Cast In Situ PILE ( = 600, L = 15m ) Calculation Cast In Situ PILE ( = 600, L = 18m ) Calculation Cast In Situ PILE ( = 600, L = 20m ) Calculation Cast In Situ PILE ( = 600, L = 25m ) Calculation CONCLUSIONS
ATTACHMENT Attachment-1: Borehole Location Attachment-2: Borehole Logs Attachment-3: Pile Drawing
CALCULATION GENERAL
General For the Olkaria Geothermal Power Plant Project, pile foundation will be needed to support the buildings and concrete structures depending on sub-soil condition. The allowable pile capacity was calculated base on soil investigation results which will be submitted as separate report(Doc No. ZP00700-B2CE-ECG-RPT-0001). In consideration of sub-soil condition, the various bored pile will be adopted.
REF.
1.2
Design Code & Reference 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) BS 8110 : Structural Use of Concrete BS 8004 : Foundations Principles of Foundation Engineering, 6th Edition, Braja M. Das, Thomson Learning, 2007 ZP00700-B2CE-ECG-DSC-0001: Design Criteria for Civil and Building Works FHWA-IF-99-025: Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and Design Methods
1.3
Design Criteria 1) Factor of Safety for End Bearing, FSbearing 2) Factor of Safety for Skin Friction, FSfriction 3) Factor of Safety for Lateral Load, FSlateral = = = 2.0 2.0 2.0
1.4
Design Data 1) Pile - Type - Dimension - Modulus of elasticity (Ep) - Pile section (Ap) 2) Concrete - Strength at 28 days (fc') - Unit weight (c) - Modulus of elasticity (Ec) 3) Reinforcement steel (BS 4449) 460 MPa
2.0E+05 MPa
25,000,000 kN/m
: : :
= = =
(Cube strength)
- Minimum yield strength (fy) : - Modulus of elasticity (Es) : - Minimum cover for concrete protection :
= =
60 mm
1/124
REF.
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) center to -1.5 -3.0 -4.5 -6.0 -7.5 -9.0 -10.0 -11.0 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5
18.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 2) (kN/m3) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 N (blow) 4 5 8 18 24 35 42
3)
0.0 N604) (blow) 4 5 8 18 24 35 42 Su5) (kPa) 17.6 22 35.2 79.2 105.6 154 184.8
Soil type
-25.0 Note: 1) 2)
Cohesive
184.8
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
2/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 1663.2 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
3/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 4 5 8 18 24 35 42 0 0 0
su (kPa) 17.6 22.0 35.2 79.2 105.6 154.0 184.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.32 0.33 0.44 0.87 1.04 0.58 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 23.9 31.9 38.3 44.7 52.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00
fmax (kPa) 9.7 12.1 19.4 43.6 58.1 84.3 95.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thick.1) (m) 1.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
As (m ) 1.9 5.7 5.7 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0
2
Qs (kN) 18.2 68.4 109.5 164.2 219.0 317.9 360.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1257.4
1)
Thickness of layer.
4/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 18.2 68.4 109.5 164.2 219.0 317.9 360.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sum = Ts (kN) 18.2 68.4 109.5 164.2 219.0 317.9 360.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1257.4
5/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
17.6 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =1727.1 kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 35.2 0.6 0.32 kPa m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
6/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.20 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 3.62 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
7/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
8/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 18.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 18.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.07
9/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 20.50
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
10/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.2 2.2.1
BH-02
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) from to center 0.0 -3.0 -1.5 -3.0 -6.0 -4.5 -6.0 -8.0 -7.0 -8.0 -11.0 -9.5 -11.0 -13.0 -12.0 -13.0 -15.0 -14.0
15.0
m
1)
0.0 N (blow) 35 31 25 21 16 16
3)
Soil type
N604) (blow) 35 31 25 21 16 16
-15.0 Note: 1) 2)
Cohesive
70.4
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
11/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 633.6 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
12/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 35 31 25 21 16 16 0 0 0 0
su (kPa) 154.0 136.4 110.0 92.4 70.4 70.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.20 0.98 1.42 1.04 0.69 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 22.3 30.3 38.3 44.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
fmax (kPa) 84.3 75.0 60.5 50.8 38.7 38.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Qs (kN) 476.8 424.2 228.1 287.4 146.0 146.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1708.4
1)
Thickness of layer.
13/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 476.8 424.2 228.1 287.4 146.0 146.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sum = Ts (kN) 476.8 424.2 228.1 287.4 146.0 146.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1708.4
14/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
154 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b = 18891 kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 308 0.6 0.4 kPa m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
15/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.37 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 5.48 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
16/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
17/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 15.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 15.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.07
18/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 17.98
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
19/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.3 2.3.1
BH-04 from 0.0 -3.0 -6.0 -8.0 -11.0 -13.0 -15.0 -18.0
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) to center -3.0 -1.5 -6.0 -4.5 -8.0 -7.0 -11.0 -9.5 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5 -20.0 -19.0
20.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 3 (kN/m ) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
2)
0.0 N (blow) 7 16 9 4 9 10 16 25
3)
Soil type
N604) (blow) 7 16 9 4 9 10 16 25
-20.0 Note: 1) 2)
Cohesive
110
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
20/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 990.0 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
21/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 7 16 9 4 9 10 16 25 0 0
su (kPa) 30.8 70.4 39.6 17.6 39.6 44.0 70.4 110.0 0.0 0.0
0.56 1.05 0.51 0.25 0.39 0.39 0.54 0.72 0.00 0.00
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 22.3 30.3 38.3 44.7 52.6 60.6 0.0 0.0
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00
fmax (kPa) 16.9 38.7 21.8 9.7 21.8 24.2 38.7 60.5 0.0 0.0
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 5.7 3.8 0.0 0.0
Qs (kN) 95.8 219.0 82.1 54.7 82.1 91.2 219.0 228.1 0.0 0.0 1072.0
1)
Thickness of layer.
22/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 95.8 219.0 82.1 54.7 82.1 91.2 219.0 228.1 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 sum = Ts (kN) 95.8 219.0 82.1 54.7 82.1 91.2 219.0 228.1 0.0 0.0 1072.0
Soil type Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive 0 0
23/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
30.8 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =3400.3 kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 61.6 0.6 0.36 kPa m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
24/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.24 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 4.76 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
25/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
26/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 20.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 990.0
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 20.0
qp (kN/m2) 990.0
Cs 0.07
27/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 24.20
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
28/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.4 2.4.1
BH-05
Subsoil Conditions
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) to center -3.0 -1.5 -6.0 -4.5 -8.0 -7.0 -11.0 -9.5 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5
18.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 3 (kN/m ) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
2)
0.0 N (blow) 30 9 30 11 17 14 15
3)
Soil type
N604) (blow) 30 9 30 11 17 14 15
-18.0 Note: 1) 2)
Cohesive
66
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
29/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 594.0 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
30/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 30 9 30 11 17 14 15 0 0 0
su (kPa) 132.0 39.6 132.0 48.4 74.8 61.6 66.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.20 0.59 0.85 0.55 0.74 0.54 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 22.3 30.3 38.3 44.7 52.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
fmax (kPa) 72.6 21.8 72.6 26.6 41.1 33.9 36.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Qs (kN) 410.5 123.2 273.7 150.5 155.1 127.7 205.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1446.0
1)
Thickness of layer.
31/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 410.5 123.2 273.7 150.5 155.1 127.7 205.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sum = Ts (kN) 410.5 123.2 273.7 150.5 155.1 127.7 205.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1446.0
32/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
132 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =###### kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 264 0.6 0.4 kPa m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
33/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.35 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 6.33 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
34/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
35/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 18.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 18.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.07
36/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 15.63
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
37/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.5 2.5.1
BH-06
Subsoil Conditions
BH-06 from 0.0 -3.0 -6.0 -8.0 -11.0 -13.0 -15.0 -18.0
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) to center -3.0 -1.5 -6.0 -4.5 -8.0 -7.0 -11.0 -9.5 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5 -20.0 -19.0
20.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 3 (kN/m ) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
2)
0.0 N (blow) 4 13 14 18 21 16 17 21
3)
Soil type
N604) (blow) 4 13 14 18 21 16 17 21
su5) (kPa) 17.6 57.2 61.6 79.2 92.4 70.4 74.8 92.4
-20.0 Note: 1) 2)
Cohesive
92.4
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
38/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 831.6 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
39/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 4 13 14 18 21 16 17 21 0 0
su (kPa) 17.6 57.2 61.6 79.2 92.4 70.4 74.8 92.4 0.0 0.0
0.32 0.85 0.80 0.89 0.91 0.62 0.57 0.60 0.00 0.00
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 22.3 30.3 38.3 44.7 52.6 60.6 0.0 0.0
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00
fmax (kPa) 9.7 31.5 33.9 43.6 50.8 38.7 41.1 50.8 0.0 0.0
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 5.7 3.8 0.0 0.0
Qs (kN) 54.7 177.9 127.7 246.3 191.6 146.0 232.6 191.6 0.0 0.0 1368.5
1)
Thickness of layer.
40/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 54.7 177.9 127.7 246.3 191.6 146.0 232.6 191.6 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 sum = Ts (kN) 54.7 177.9 127.7 246.3 191.6 146.0 232.6 191.6 0.0 0.0 1368.5
Soil type Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive 0 0
41/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
17.6 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =1727.1 kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 35.2 0.6 0.32 kPa m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
42/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.20 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 4.02 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
43/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
44/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 20.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 20.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.07
45/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 16.49
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
46/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.6 2.6.1
BH-08
Subsoil Conditions
BH-08 from 0.0 -3.0 -6.0 -8.0 -11.0 -13.0 -15.0 -18.0
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) to center -3.0 -1.5 -6.0 -4.5 -8.0 -7.0 -11.0 -9.5 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5 -20.0 -19.0
20.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 3 (kN/m ) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
2)
0.0 N (blow) 15 12 15 15 21 17 16 16
3)
Soil type
N604) (blow) 15 12 15 15 21 17 16 16
-20.0 Note: 1) 2)
Cohesive
70.4
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
47/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 633.6 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
48/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 15 12 15 15 21 17 16 16 0 0
su (kPa) 66.0 52.8 66.0 66.0 92.4 74.8 70.4 70.4 0.0 0.0
1.20 0.78 0.85 0.74 0.91 0.66 0.54 0.46 0.00 0.00
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 22.3 30.3 38.3 44.7 52.6 60.6 0.0 0.0
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00
fmax (kPa) 36.3 29.0 36.3 36.3 50.8 41.1 38.7 38.7 0.0 0.0
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 5.7 3.8 0.0 0.0
Qs (kN) 205.3 164.2 136.8 205.3 191.6 155.1 219.0 146.0 0.0 0.0 1423.2
1)
Thickness of layer.
49/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 205.3 164.2 136.8 205.3 191.6 155.1 219.0 146.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 sum = Ts (kN) 205.3 164.2 136.8 205.3 191.6 155.1 219.0 146.0 0.0 0.0 1423.2
Soil type Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive 0 0
50/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
66 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =7286.4 kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 132 0.6 0.36 kPa m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
51/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.29 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 5.76 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
52/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
53/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 20.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 20.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.07
54/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 15.75
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
55/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.7 2.7.1
BH-09
Subsoil Conditions
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) to center -3.0 -1.5 -6.0 -4.5 -8.0 -7.0 -11.0 -9.5 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5
18.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 3 (kN/m ) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
2)
0.0 N (blow) 17 8 19 17 17 20 21
3)
Soil type
N604) (blow) 17 8 19 17 17 20 21
-18.0 Note: 1) 2)
Cohesive
92.4
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
56/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 831.6 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
57/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 17 8 19 17 17 20 21 0 0 0
su (kPa) 74.8 35.2 83.6 74.8 74.8 88.0 92.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.36 0.52 1.08 0.84 0.74 0.78 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 22.3 30.3 38.3 44.7 52.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
fmax (kPa) 41.1 19.4 46.0 41.1 41.1 48.4 50.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Qs (kN) 232.6 109.5 173.3 232.6 155.1 182.5 287.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1373.0
1)
Thickness of layer.
58/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 232.6 109.5 173.3 232.6 155.1 182.5 287.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sum = Ts (kN) 232.6 109.5 173.3 232.6 155.1 182.5 287.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1373.0
59/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
74.8 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =8257.9 kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 149.6 kPa 0.6 0.36 m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
60/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.30 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 5.35 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
61/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
62/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 18.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 18.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.07
63/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 16.45
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
64/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.8 2.8.1
BH-10
Subsoil Conditions
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) to center -3.0 -1.5 -6.0 -4.5 -8.0 -7.0 -11.0 -9.5 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5
18.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 3 (kN/m ) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
2)
0.0 N (blow) 23 14 11 16 24 18 16
3)
Soil type
N604) (blow) 23 14 11 16 24 18 16
-18.0 Note: 1) 2)
Cohesive
70.4
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
65/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 633.6 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
66/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 23 14 11 16 24 18 16 0 0 0
su (kPa) 101.2 61.6 48.4 70.4 105.6 79.2 70.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.84 0.91 0.62 0.79 1.04 0.70 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 22.3 30.3 38.3 44.7 52.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
fmax (kPa) 55.7 33.9 26.6 38.7 58.1 43.6 38.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Qs (kN) 314.7 191.6 100.4 219.0 219.0 164.2 219.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1427.8
1)
Thickness of layer.
67/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 314.7 191.6 100.4 219.0 219.0 164.2 219.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sum = Ts (kN) 314.7 191.6 100.4 219.0 219.0 164.2 219.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1427.8
68/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =###### kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 202.4 kPa 0.6 0.4 m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
69/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.33 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 5.92 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
70/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
71/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 18.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 18.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.07
72/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 15.72
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
73/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.9 2.9.1
BH-11
Subsoil Conditions
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) to center -3.0 -1.5 -6.0 -4.5 -8.0 -7.0 -11.0 -9.5 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5
18.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 3 (kN/m ) 12.0 20.0 12.0 14.0 18.0 15.0 22.0
2)
0.0 N (blow) 18 16 11 14 18 17 24
3)
Soil type
N604) (blow) 18 16 11 14 18 17 24
-18.0 Note: 1) 2)
Cohesive
105.6
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
74/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 950.4 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
75/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 18 16 11 14 18 17 24 0 0 0
su (kPa) 79.2 70.4 48.4 61.6 79.2 74.8 105.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.44 1.05 0.62 0.70 0.78 0.66 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00
v' (kPa) 3.3 21.9 39.3 47.8 62.3 75.7 99.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
fmax (kPa) 43.6 38.7 26.6 33.9 43.6 41.1 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Qs (kN) 246.3 219.0 100.4 191.6 164.2 155.1 328.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1405.0
1)
Thickness of layer.
76/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 246.3 219.0 100.4 191.6 164.2 155.1 328.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sum = Ts (kN) 246.3 219.0 100.4 191.6 164.2 155.1 328.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1405.0
77/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
79.2 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =8743.7 kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 158.4 kPa 0.6 0.36 m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
78/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.30 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 5.42 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
79/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
80/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 18.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 18.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.07
81/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 17.44
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
82/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.10 2.10.1
DBH-01
Subsoil Conditions
DBH-01 from 0.0 -3.0 -6.0 -8.0 -11.0 -13.0 -15.0 -18.0 -20.0 -23.0 -25.0 Note: 1) 2)
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) to center -3.0 -1.5 -6.0 -4.5 -8.0 -7.0 -11.0 -9.5 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5 -20.0 -19.0 -23.0 -21.5 -25.0 -24.0 ~
25.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 3 (kN/m ) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
2)
0.0 N (blow) 11 9 12 21 8 25 20 17 21 23
3)
Soil type
Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive
N604) (blow) 11 9 12 21 8 25 20 17 21 23
su5) (kPa) 48.4 39.6 52.8 92.4 35.2 110 88 74.8 92.4 101.2 101.2
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
83/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 910.8 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
84/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 11 9 12 21 8 25 20 17 21 23
su (kPa) 48.4 39.6 52.8 92.4 35.2 110.0 88.0 74.8 92.4 101.2
0.88 0.59 0.68 1.04 0.35 0.97 0.67 0.49 0.51 0.46
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 22.3 30.3 38.3 44.7 52.6 60.6 68.6 76.6
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55
fmax (kPa) 26.6 21.8 29.0 50.8 19.4 60.5 48.4 41.1 50.8 55.7
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8
Qs (kN) 150.5 123.2 109.5 287.4 73.0 228.1 273.7 155.1 287.4 209.8 1897.6
1)
Thickness of layer.
85/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 150.5 123.2 109.5 287.4 73.0 228.1 273.7 155.1 287.4 209.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 sum = Ts (kN) 150.5 123.2 109.5 287.4 73.0 228.1 273.7 155.1 287.4 209.8 1897.6
Soil type Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive
86/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
48.4 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =5343.4 kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 96.8 0.6 0.36 kPa m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
87/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.27 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 6.66 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
88/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
89/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 25.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 25.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.08
90/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 21.73
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
91/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
2.11 2.11.1
DBH-02
Subsoil Conditions
DBH-02 from 0.0 -3.0 -6.0 -8.0 -11.0 -13.0 -15.0 -18.0 -20.0 -23.0 -25.0 Note: 1) 2)
Pile Length = Depth of layer (m) to center -3.0 -1.5 -6.0 -4.5 -8.0 -7.0 -11.0 -9.5 -13.0 -12.0 -15.0 -14.0 -18.0 -16.5 -20.0 -19.0 -23.0 -21.5 -25.0 -24.0 ~
25.0
m
1)
G.W.T (m) = 3 (kN/m ) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
2)
0.0 N (blow) 6 4 5 10 16 21 25 19 21 27
3)
Soil type
Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive
N604) (blow) 6 4 5 10 16 21 25 19 21 27
su5) (kPa) 26.4 17.6 22 44 70.4 92.4 110 83.6 92.4 118.8 118.8
"Cohesive" = clay or plastic sily, "Cohesionless" = sand, gravel or non-plastic silt For cohesionless soil, we couldn't carry out unit weight tests because sampling of cohesionless soil is very difficult. Therefore, we use typical soil properties in a natural state and conservartively select soil type. - Type of soil = - Natural moisture content in a saturated sta = - Dry unit weight, d = Loose angular-grained silty sand 25 % 12 kN/m3
3) 4)
SPT N-value obtained from the field test Corrected for hammer energy without overburden pressure correction N60 = ( ER / 60 ) x N where, ER = SPT energy ratio = 60 %
Attachment-2
5)
Cohesion of so(take minimum value from following two equations) K N where K = 4 kN/m2 (Stroud, 1974) 0.72( Hara et al, 1971) 29 N
92/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Compression Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil qmax = Nc* x su = where, Nc* 1069.2 kPa 9
REF.
= bearing capacity factor = 6.5 at su = 24 kPa 8.0 at su = 48 kPa 9.0 at su > 25 kPa
su
= average undrained shear strength between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base
= average SPT blow count between the base of the pile and an elevation 2B below the base for condition which approximately 60 percent of the potential energy of hammer is transferred
2) Side Resistance for Compression Loading a) Cohesive soil fmax = x su where, = a dimensionless correction coefficient defined as follows: =0 between the ground surface and a depth of 1.5 m or to the depth of seasonal moisture change, whichever is deeper =0 for a distance of B (the diameter of the base) above the base = 0.55 for su / Pa 1.5 (Mpa) = 0.55 - 0.1 ( su / Pa - 1.5 ) for 1.5 su / Pa 2.5 (Mpa) where, Pa =the atmospheric pressure in the units being used (e.g., 101 kPa in the SI system).
b) Cohesionless soil fmax = x 'v where, 'v = = vertical effective stress at the middle of layer dimensionless correction factor defined as follows: in sands 0.5 for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 1.5 - 0.245 z for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) in gravelly sands or gravels for N60 15 B / 0.3 m = 2.0 - 0.15 z0.75 for N60 < 15 B / 0.3 m = ( N60 / 15 ) x ( 1.5 - 0.245 z0.5 ) where, z = vertical distance from the ground surface to the middle of layer (in meters)
93/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
N60 (blow) 6 4 5 10 16 21 25 19 21 27
su (kPa) 26.4 17.6 22.0 44.0 70.4 92.4 110.0 83.6 92.4 118.8
0.48 0.26 0.28 0.50 0.69 0.82 0.84 0.55 0.51 0.54
v' (kPa) 4.8 14.4 22.3 30.3 38.3 44.7 52.6 60.6 68.6 76.6
0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55
fmax (kPa) 14.5 9.7 12.1 24.2 38.7 50.8 60.5 46.0 50.8 65.3
Thick. (m) 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0
1)
As (m2) 5.7 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8 3.8 5.7 3.8 5.7 3.8
Qs (kN) 82.1 54.7 45.6 136.8 146.0 191.6 342.1 173.3 287.4 246.3 1706.0
1)
Thickness of layer.
94/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Tension Capacity (Reese and O'Neill, 1999) 1) Base resistance for uplift loading qmax (uplift) Note:
1)
REF.
1)
qmax should be taken as zero for uplift loading unless experience or load testing at the construction site can show that suction between the bottom of the drilled shaft and the soil can be predicted reliably or the drilled shaft has a bell.
2) Side resistance for uplift loading fmax (uplift) = x fmax (compression) where, = = 1.00 0.75 for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Qs (kN) 82.1 54.7 45.6 136.8 146.0 191.6 342.1 173.3 287.4 246.3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 sum = Ts (kN) 82.1 54.7 45.6 136.8 146.0 191.6 342.1 173.3 287.4 246.3 1706.0
Soil type Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive Cohesive
95/124
CALCULATION
Allowable Lateral Load Capacity (Broms' Method) 1) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction a) General soil type1) : Note: 1) Cohesive
REF.
Determine the general soil type within the critical depth below the grond surface (about 4 or 5 pile diameters).
FHWA-HI-97-013 Chapter 9
= =
26.4 0.0
kPa deg =
for Cohesive soil for Cohesionless soil Internal friction angle correleted by Ozaki's equation Note: 1) = ( 20 N )
0.5 1)
where,
+ 15
c) Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction, Kh Kh = n1 x n2 x 80 x qu / b =2914.6 kN/m3 where, qu = b = n1 = for Cohesive soil = = = 52.8 0.6 0.36 kPa m
Unconfined compressive strength Width or diameter of pile Empirical coefficients dependent on qu n1 = 0.32 for less than 48 kPa n1 = 0.36 for 48 to 191 kPa n1 = 0.40 for more than 191 kPa
n2 =
Empirical coefficient dependent on pile material = n2 = 1.00 for steel n2 = 1.15 for concrete n2 = 1.30 for wood for Cohesionless soil
1.15
Kh =
0.0
kN/m3
where, above ground water Kh = 1900 kN/m3 Kh = 8143 kN/m3 Kh = 17644 kN/m3 below ground water Kh = 1086 kN/m3 Kh = 5429 kN/m3 Kh = 10857 kN/m3
96/124
CALCULATION
REF.
= =
0.23 0.00
m m
-1
-1
b) Length factor h D = D = 5.72 0.00 for Cohesive soil, for Cohesionless soil,
where, h D > 2.25 (long pile) h D < 2.25 (short pile) b) Cohesionless soil: short pile
where, D > 4.0 (long pile) D < 2.0 (short pile) 2.0 < D < 4.0 (intermediate pile) Soil type = Pile type = Cohesive long pile
97/124
CALCULATION
REF.
where, cu
= = = =
Hu / FSlateral =
98/124
REF.
Elastic Settlement of Pile se(1) = (Qwp + Qws) x L / (Ap x Ep) where, Qwp Qws Ap L Ep = = = = = = load carried at the pile point under working load condition load carried by frictional resistance under working load condition area of cross section of pile length of pile modulus of elasticity of the pile material coefficient which will depend on the nature of the distribution of the unit friction resistance along the pile shaft conservatively, 0.5
Borehole Design-N
Ap (m ) 0.28
2
L (m) 25.0
Ep (Mpa) 25000
0.5
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load at the Pile Tip (Vesic, 1977) se(2) = (Qwp x Cp) / (D x qp) where, qp = Cp = ultimate point resistance of the pile an empirical coefficient Driven piles 0.02 - 0.04 0.02 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.05 Bored piles 0.09 - 0.18 0.03 - 0.06 0.09 - 0.12
Type of soil Sand (dense to loose) Clay (Stiff to Soft) Silt (dense to loose)
Borehole Design-N
D (mm) 600
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cp 0.04
Settlement of Pile Caused by the Load Transmitted along the Pile Shaft (Vesic, 1977) se(3) = (QwS x CS) / (L x qp) where, Cs = an empirical constant = [ 0.93 + 0.16 (L / D)0.5 ] Cp
Borehole Design-N
L (m) 25.0
qp (kN/m2) 1663.2
Cs 0.08
99/124
CALCULATION
REF.
se (mm) 21.08
Check1) O.K
se(allowable) = 50.0 mm Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design, Annex H, For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50mm are often acceptable.
100/124
CALCULATION Summary The allowable pile capacities for Olkaria IV Power Plant project are summarized as follows.
REF.
Borehole BH-04 Applied BH-02 Applied BH-01 BH-10 BH-11 BH-09 BH-05 Applied BH-06 BH-08 Applied DBH-01 DBH-02 Applied
Length (m) 20.0 20.0 15.0 15.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
Allowable Pile Capacity (kN / EA) Compression Tension Lateral 675.9 600.0 943.8 800.0 863.8 803.5 836.8 804.1 807.0 800.0 801.8 801.2 800.0 1077.6 1004.2 1000.0 536.0 300.0 854.2 500.0 628.7 713.9 702.5 686.5 723.0 500.0 684.2 711.6 500.0 948.8 853.0 500.0 221.8 150.0 388.1 150.0 180.6 327.9 327.9 296.2 403.9 150.0 183.7 297.0 150.0 261.4 213.8 150.0
Pipe Rack
101/124
REF.
4.1 4.1.1
: :
Length Embedded Length Cube Strength ( fcu ) Reinforcement ( fy ) Main Bars Addtl. Main Bars Tie Stirrups Cover 4.1.2 PILE CAPACITY CHECK 1) Compressive Pile Capacity
: : : : : : : :
mm (nominal) ; bored pile kN (C) ; compression kN (S) ; shear kN (T) ; tension m (from existing ground level) m Mpa Mpa BS4449 GRADE 460 20 No. mm for full length 20 No. mm 5 M Long mm @ 200 mm mm
Alowing for eccentricity of loading due to deviations during construction, the untimate axial load should not exceed the value of N given by: fcu As Ac 0.45 x 0.95 N = x + x fcu 25 N/mm2 = fy 460 N/mm2 = Ac 282,743 mm2 = As 2,827 mm2 = N = = 0.45 x 25 4,416,451 N 2.0 = = 2208.2 KN x 282,743 + 0.95 x 2,827 x
fy
460
75
The rebar shall be designed for this Article requirement plus seismic action 150.0 kN Assume H-force on the Pile : 160.7 kN Horizontal load on pile : (due to construction allowances) 60.0 kN-M B.M produced by eccentricity : A) Bending Moment calculations in Pile due to H-force and constructional allowances: References: Menard Theory and The Pressuremeter and Foundation Engineering by Baguelin-Jezequel-Shields. 0 10.6 N 23.75 Average SPTs from to is
102/124
REF.
M 0.404 = kN-m
-1
M KM-M 198.777
From CP 110: Part 3 for circular columns (not covered by BS 8110): 410 mm hs = 410 Then hs /h = = 0.6 600 FOR THE UPPER PORTION OF THE PILE UP TO 5 M : 259 KN-M M = Use Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3 where hs / h = For the Ultimate State Design, use a load factor of 1.5: 1.5 1.5 N M = 33.333 ; = 1.797 h2 h3 From Chart 134, CP110: PART 3, for this condition As = 1.7% of Ac Our design provides: REINFORCEMENT: Main Bars, Addtl. Main Bars Thor , Links 0.6
Area
9 9 = 10
20 : 20 : of concrete 200
mm mm mm
5 M Long
5M DOWN FROM COL TO TOE LEVEL OF THE PILE: 63.45 M = kN-m 0.6 Use Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3 where hs / h = For the Ultimate State Design, use a load factor of 1.5: 1.5 N 1.5 M = 33.333 ; = 0.441 2 h3 h From Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3, for this condition As = 0% of Ac
103/124
CALCULATION
REF.
9 = 10
20 : of concrete 200
mm mm
3) Calculation of length of Reinforcement: From the theory of an elastic supported beam: Mx = 2 2 e-x EI [ C2 cos x - C1 sin x ] Hx = 2 3 e-x EI [( C1 + C2 ) cos x - ( C1 - C2 ) sinx ] For boundary conditions, when x I Hx = 0, M = Mx = 258.78 1 KN-M
= 6361725124 , cos x = 1, sin x = 0 , e- x = H = = 160.65 KN , = 0.4041 MT C2 = = 0.0044 2 EI 2 1 H C1 = = -0.0112819 ( + M ) 2 EI 2 Mx = 2 28 10 3 0.40 2 6361725124 -0.0112819 ) sin x ) e ( 0.0044 cos x - ( Substituting in the foregoing formula for varying depths in Metres y (x), we obtain the Moment Distribution in the pile as follows: Tabulating for x: In the following table 0 = Ground Level x c Mx cos x sin x e- x Meter 0 1.000 1.000 0.000 258.777 40.497 2 0.446 0.691 0.723 291.158 42.024 4 0.199 -0.046 0.999 127.876 34.324 5 0.133 -0.435 0.901 63.455 31.287 6 0.089 -0.754 0.657 20.909 29.280 8 0.039 -0.996 -0.091 -12.524 27.704 10 0.018 -0.622 -0.783 -11.864 27.735 12 0.008 0.136 -0.991 -4.817 28.067 14 0.003 0.811 -0.586 -0.610 28.265 15 0.002 0.976 -0.220 0.252 28.306
c 16.091 14.564 22.264 25.302 27.308 28.885 28.854 28.521 28.323 28.282
As an example of the foregoing calculations stresses, 63.455 the Moment at 5M = KN-M at 5 M = = Nc Ac 800 /4 M 1 10 600
3 2
2 63.455 10 6361725124
6
600 2
2 2 5.82 -0.16 Or = N/mm N/mm As per BS 8004 Article 7.4.4.3.1: these stresses are < 0.25 fcu or 10 N/mm2 From the above results it can be inferred that stresses in the concrete are acceptable 5 if m long steel is used. However we are providing for full length steel.
104/124
CALCULATION
REF.
O.K
BS 8110, Part 1
5) Check for Clear Spacing: 9 20 For bars of mm dia , C.C spacing 163.116999 mm Therefore clear spacing is Art 3.12.11.2.4 of BS 8110 (Part 1): max clear spacing is 9 Thus bars provided are adequate
143.12 300 mm
Clause 3.12.11
6) Check for Bond Length: Table 3.27 of BS 8110 shows the following values of anchorages for various grades of concrete
2 For fcu 25 = N/mm 32 20 Anchorage length = = 640 We propose mm into the pile cap
640
mm
7) Check for Stirrups: From Table 3.8 BS 8110 (Part 1) , for fcu 0.614 Shear Stress = Vmax = Working Shear Stress in pile =
BS 8110, Part 1
= N/mm
2
25
N/mm
Clause 3.4.5.12
/ 4 2 3 160.7 10 Vw = = 0.5682 0 5682 N/mm2 /4 600 2 As, Vmax < Vw < Vmax / 2 (Table 3.8), applied the minimum steel ratio. 10 200 however we provide nominal mm links Therefore safe. 8) Lateral Reinforcement: As previously shown lateral reinforcement is not required for shear considerations, however buckling should be investigated. Eulers theory gives the minimum force for buckling as F EI 2 eK where E = Youngs modulus for steel =
2
Vw =
Hw
= =
200 64
10 =
kN/m2 7.854E-09 M4
I = Moment of Inertia of the bar eK = Free length to be examined hereunder: Refer to attached sketches on following page. Thus eK 200 = I / 2= / Minimum Force for Buckling is F =
2=
100
mm
2 EI = 1,550 kN 2 eK For this condition, the compressive stress in the bar is F where b = = 4,935 N/mm2 , / 4 b2
20
mm
460 0.7 = 322 N/mm2 The working stress in steel is fya = So for compression, using figure 2 in CF 110 Part 2, if the stress for buckling is higher than the allowable compressive stress, the risk of Buckling does not exist. 4,935 N/mm2 322 N/mm2 ), F = > fya (
105/124
REF.
: :
Length Embedded Length Cube Strength ( fcu ) Reinforcement ( fy ) Main Bars Addtl. Main Bars Tie Stirrups Cover 4.2.2 PILE CAPACITY CHECK 1) Compressive Pile Capacity
: : : : : : : :
mm (nominal) ; bored pile kN (C) ; compression kN (S) ; shear kN (T) ; tension m (from existing ground level) m Mpa Mpa BS4449 GRADE 460 20 No. mm for full length 20 No. mm 5 M Long mm @ 200 mm mm
Alowing for eccentricity of loading due to deviations during construction, the untimate axial load should not exceed the value of N given by: fcu As Ac 0.45 x 0.95 N = x + x fcu 25 N/mm2 = fy 460 N/mm2 = Ac 282,743 mm2 = As 2,827 mm2 = N = = 0.45 x 25 4,416,451 N 2.0 = = 2208.2 KN x 282,743 + 0.95 x 2,827 x
fy
460
75
The rebar shall be designed for this Article requirement plus seismic action 150.0 kN Assume H-force on the Pile : 160.7 kN Horizontal load on pile : (due to construction allowances) 60.0 kN-M B.M produced by eccentricity : A) Bending Moment calculations in Pile due to H-force and constructional allowances: References: Menard Theory and The Pressuremeter and Foundation Engineering by Baguelin-Jezequel-Shields. 0 10.6 N 23.75 Average SPTs from to is
106/124
REF.
M 0.404 = kN-m
-1
M KM-M 198.777
From CP 110: Part 3 for circular columns (not covered by BS 8110): 410 mm hs = 410 Then hs /h = = 0.6 600 FOR THE UPPER PORTION OF THE PILE UP TO 5 M : 259 KN-M M = Use Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3 where hs / h = For the Ultimate State Design, use a load factor of 1.5: 1.5 1.5 N M = 33.333 ; = 1.797 2 h3 h From Chart 134, CP110: PART 3, for this condition As = 1.7% of Ac Our design provides: REINFORCEMENT: Main Bars, Addtl. Main Bars Thor , Links 0.6
Area
9 9 = 10
20 : 20 : of concrete 200
mm mm mm
5 M Long
5M DOWN FROM COL TO TOE LEVEL OF THE PILE: 63.45 M = kN-m 0.6 Use Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3 where hs / h = For the Ultimate State Design, use a load factor of 1.5: 1.5 N 1.5 M = 33.333 ; = 0.441 2 h3 h From Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3, for this condition As = 0% of Ac
107/124
CALCULATION
REF.
9 = 10
20 : of concrete 200
mm mm
3) Calculation of length of Reinforcement: From the theory of an elastic supported beam: Mx = 2 2 e-x EI [ C2 cos x - C1 sin x ] Hx = 2 3 e-x EI [( C1 + C2 ) cos x - ( C1 - C2 ) sinx ] For boundary conditions, when x I Hx = 0, M = Mx = 258.78 1 KN-M
= 6361725124 , cos x = 1, sin x = 0 , e- x = H = = 160.65 KN , = 0.4041 MT C2 = = 0.0044 2 EI 2 1 H C1 = ( + M ) = -0.0112819 2 EI 2 Mx = 2 28 10 3 0.40 2 6361725124 -0.0112819 ) sin x ) e ( 0.0044 cos x - ( Substituting in the foregoing formula for varying depths in Metres y (x), we obtain the Moment Distribution in the pile as follows: Tabulating for x: In the following table 0 = Ground Level x c Mx cos x sin x e- x Meter 0 1.000 1.000 0.000 258.777 40.497 2 0.446 0.691 0.723 291.158 42.024 4 0.199 -0.046 0.999 127.876 34.324 5 0.133 -0.435 0.901 63.455 31.287 6 0.089 -0.754 0.657 20.909 29.280 8 0.039 -0.996 -0.091 -12.524 27.704 10 0.018 -0.622 -0.783 -11.864 27.735 12 0.008 0.136 -0.991 -4.817 28.067 14 0.003 0.811 -0.586 -0.610 28.265 16 0.002 0.983 0.181 0.581 28.322 18 0.001 0.548 0.836 0.479 28.317
c 16.091 14.564 22.264 25.302 27.308 28.885 28.854 28.521 28.323 28.267 28.272
As an example of the foregoing calculations stresses, 63.455 the Moment at 5M = KN-M at 5 M = = Nc Ac 800 /4 M 1 10 600
3 2
2 63.455 10 6361725124
6
600 2
2 2 5.82 -0.16 Or = N/mm N/mm As per BS 8004 Article 7.4.4.3.1: these stresses are < 0.25 fcu or 10 N/mm2 From the above results it can be inferred that stresses in the concrete are acceptable 5 if m long steel is used. However we are providing for full length steel.
108/124
CALCULATION
REF.
O.K
BS 8110, Part 1
5) Check for Clear Spacing: 9 20 For bars of mm dia , C.C spacing 163.116999 mm Therefore clear spacing is Art 3.12.11.2.4 of BS 8110 (Part 1): max clear spacing is 9 Thus bars provided are adequate
143.12 300 mm
Clause 3.12.11
6) Check for Bond Length: Table 3.27 of BS 8110 shows the following values of anchorages for various grades of concrete
2 For fcu 25 = N/mm 32 20 Anchorage length = = 640 We propose mm into the pile cap
640
mm
7) Check for Stirrups: From Table 3.8 BS 8110 (Part 1) , for fcu 0.614 Shear Stress = Vmax = Working Shear Stress in pile =
BS 8110, Part 1
= N/mm
2
25
N/mm
Clause 3.4.5.12
/ 4 2 3 160.7 10 Vw = = 0.5682 0 5682 N/mm2 /4 600 2 As, Vmax < Vw < Vmax / 2 (Table 3.8), applied the minimum steel ratio. 10 200 however we provide nominal mm links Therefore safe. 8) Lateral Reinforcement: As previously shown lateral reinforcement is not required for shear considerations, however buckling should be investigated. Eulers theory gives the minimum force for buckling as F EI 2 eK where E = Youngs modulus for steel = I = Moment of Inertia of the bar eK = Free length to be examined hereunder: Refer to attached sketches on following page. Thus eK 200 = I / 2= / Minimum Force for Buckling is F =
2
Vw =
Hw
= =
200 64
10 =
kN/m2 7.854E-09 M4
2=
100
mm
2 EI = 1,550 kN 2 eK For this condition, the compressive stress in the bar is F where b = = 4,935 N/mm2 , 2 / 4 b
20
mm
460 0.7 = 322 N/mm2 The working stress in steel is fya = So for compression, using figure 2 in CF 110 Part 2, if the stress for buckling is higher than the allowable compressive stress, the risk of Buckling does not exist. 4,935 N/mm2 322 N/mm2 ), F = > fya (
109/124
REF.
: :
Length Embedded Length Cube Strength ( fcu ) Reinforcement ( fy ) Main Bars Addtl. Main Bars Tie Stirrups Cover 4.3.2 PILE CAPACITY CHECK 1) Compressive Pile Capacity
: : : : : : : :
mm (nominal) ; bored pile kN (C) ; compression kN (S) ; shear kN (T) ; tension m (from existing ground level) m Mpa Mpa BS4449 GRADE 460 20 No. mm for full length 20 No. mm 5 M Long mm @ 200 mm mm
Alowing for eccentricity of loading due to deviations during construction, the untimate axial load should not exceed the value of N given by: fcu As Ac 0.45 x 0.95 N = x + x fcu 25 N/mm2 = fy 460 N/mm2 = Ac 282,743 mm2 = As 2,827 mm2 = N = = 0.45 x 25 4,416,451 N 2.0 = = 2208.2 KN x 282,743 + 0.95 x 2,827 x
fy
460
75
The rebar shall be designed for this Article requirement plus seismic action 150.0 kN Assume H-force on the Pile : 160.7 kN Horizontal load on pile : (due to construction allowances) 60.0 kN-M B.M produced by eccentricity : A) Bending Moment calculations in Pile due to H-force and constructional allowances: References: Menard Theory and The Pressuremeter and Foundation Engineering by Baguelin-Jezequel-Shields. 0 10.6 N 23.75 Average SPTs from to is
110/124
REF.
M 0.404 = kN-m
-1
M KM-M 198.777
From CP 110: Part 3 for circular columns (not covered by BS 8110): 410 mm hs = 410 Then hs /h = = 0.6 600 FOR THE UPPER PORTION OF THE PILE UP TO 5 M : 259 KN-M M = Use Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3 where hs / h = For the Ultimate State Design, use a load factor of 1.5: 1.5 1.5 N M = 33.333 ; = 1.797 h2 h3 From Chart 134, CP110: PART 3, for this condition As = 1.7% of Ac Our design provides: REINFORCEMENT: Main Bars, Addtl. Main Bars Thor , Links 0.6
Area
9 9 = 10
20 : 20 : of concrete 200
mm mm mm
5 M Long
5M DOWN FROM COL TO TOE LEVEL OF THE PILE: 63.45 M = kN-m 0.6 Use Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3 where hs / h = For the Ultimate State Design, use a load factor of 1.5: 1.5 N 1.5 M = 33.333 ; = 0.441 2 h3 h From Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3, for this condition As = 0% of Ac
111/124
CALCULATION
REF.
9 = 10
20 : of concrete 200
mm mm
3) Calculation of length of Reinforcement: From the theory of an elastic supported beam: Mx = 2 2 e-x EI [ C2 cos x - C1 sin x ] Hx = 2 3 e-x EI [( C1 + C2 ) cos x - ( C1 - C2 ) sinx ] For boundary conditions, when x I Hx = 0, M = Mx = 258.78 1 KN-M
= 6361725124 , cos x = 1, sin x = 0 , e- x = H = = 160.65 KN , = 0.4041 MT C2 = = 0.0044 2 EI 2 1 H C1 = = -0.0112819 ( + M ) 2 EI 2 Mx = 2 28 10 3 0.40 2 6361725124 -0.0112819 ) sin x ) e ( 0.0044 cos x - ( Substituting in the foregoing formula for varying depths in Metres y (x), we obtain the Moment Distribution in the pile as follows: Tabulating for x: In the following table 0 = Ground Level x c Mx cos x sin x e- x Meter 0 1.000 1.000 0.000 258.777 40.497 2 0.446 0.691 0.723 291.158 42.024 4 0.199 -0.046 0.999 127.876 34.324 5 0.133 -0.435 0.901 63.455 31.287 6 0.089 -0.754 0.657 20.909 29.280 8 0.039 -0.996 -0.091 -12.524 27.704 10 0.018 -0.622 -0.783 -11.864 27.735 12 0.008 0.136 -0.991 -4.817 28.067 14 0.003 0.811 -0.586 -0.610 28.265 16 0.002 0.983 0.181 0.581 28.322 18 0.001 0.548 0.836 0.479 28.317 20 0.000 -0.226 0.974 0.180 28.303
c 16.091 14.564 22.264 25.302 27.308 28.885 28.854 28.521 28.323 28.267 28.272 28.286
As an example of the foregoing calculations stresses, 63.455 the Moment at 5M = KN-M at 5 M = = Nc Ac 800 /4 M 1 10 600
3 2
2 63.455 10 6361725124
6
600 2
2 2 5.82 -0.16 Or = N/mm N/mm As per BS 8004 Article 7.4.4.3.1: these stresses are < 0.25 fcu or 10 N/mm2 From the above results it can be inferred that stresses in the concrete are acceptable 5 if m long steel is used. However we are providing for full length steel.
112/124
CALCULATION
REF.
O.K
BS 8110, Part 1
5) Check for Clear Spacing: 9 20 For bars of mm dia , C.C spacing 163.116999 mm Therefore clear spacing is Art 3.12.11.2.4 of BS 8110 (Part 1): max clear spacing is 9 Thus bars provided are adequate
143.12 300 mm
Clause 3.12.11
6) Check for Bond Length: Table 3.27 of BS 8110 shows the following values of anchorages for various grades of concrete
2 For fcu 25 = N/mm 32 20 Anchorage length = = 640 We propose mm into the pile cap
640
mm
7) Check for Stirrups: From Table 3.8 BS 8110 (Part 1) , for fcu 0.614 Shear Stress = Vmax = Working Shear Stress in pile =
BS 8110, Part 1
= N/mm
2
25
N/mm
Clause 3.4.5.12
/ 4 2 3 160.7 10 Vw = = 0.5682 0 5682 N/mm2 /4 600 2 As, Vmax < Vw < Vmax / 2 (Table 3.8), applied the minimum steel ratio. 10 200 however we provide nominal mm links Therefore safe. 8) Lateral Reinforcement: As previously shown lateral reinforcement is not required for shear considerations, however buckling should be investigated. Eulers theory gives the minimum force for buckling as F EI 2 eK where E = Youngs modulus for steel =
2
Vw =
Hw
= =
200 64
10 =
kN/m2 7.854E-09 M4
I = Moment of Inertia of the bar eK = Free length to be examined hereunder: Refer to attached sketches on following page. Thus eK 200 = I / 2= / Minimum Force for Buckling is F =
2=
100
mm
2 EI = 1,550 kN 2 eK For this condition, the compressive stress in the bar is F where b = = 4,935 N/mm2 , / 4 b2
20
mm
460 0.7 = 322 N/mm2 The working stress in steel is fya = So for compression, using figure 2 in CF 110 Part 2, if the stress for buckling is higher than the allowable compressive stress, the risk of Buckling does not exist. 4,935 N/mm2 322 N/mm2 ), F = > fya (
113/124
REF.
: :
Length Embedded Length Cube Strength ( fcu ) Reinforcement ( fy ) Main Bars Addtl. Main Bars Tie Stirrups Cover 4.4.2 PILE CAPACITY CHECK 1) Compressive Pile Capacity
: : : : : : : :
mm (nominal) ; bored pile kN (C) ; compression kN (S) ; shear kN (T) ; tension m (from existing ground level) m Mpa Mpa BS4449 GRADE 460 20 No. mm for full length 20 No. mm 5 M Long mm @ 200 mm mm
Alowing for eccentricity of loading due to deviations during construction, the untimate axial load should not exceed the value of N given by: fcu As Ac 0.45 x 0.95 N = x + x fcu 25 N/mm2 = fy 460 N/mm2 = Ac 282,743 mm2 = As 2,827 mm2 = N = = 0.45 x 25 4,416,451 N 2.0 = = 2208.2 KN x 282,743 + 0.95 x 2,827 x
fy
460
75
The rebar shall be designed for this Article requirement plus seismic action 150.0 kN Assume H-force on the Pile : 163.3 kN Horizontal load on pile : (due to construction allowances) 75.0 kN-M B.M produced by eccentricity : A) Bending Moment calculations in Pile due to H-force and constructional allowances: References: Menard Theory and The Pressuremeter and Foundation Engineering by Baguelin-Jezequel-Shields. 0 10.6 N 23.75 Average SPTs from to is
114/124
REF.
M 0.404 = kN-m
-1
M KM-M 202.077
From CP 110: Part 3 for circular columns (not covered by BS 8110): 410 mm hs = 410 Then hs /h = = 0.6 600 FOR THE UPPER PORTION OF THE PILE UP TO 5 M : 259 KN-M M = Use Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3 where hs / h = For the Ultimate State Design, use a load factor of 1.5: 1.5 1.5 N M = 41.667 ; = 1.797 h2 h3 From Chart 134, CP110: PART 3, for this condition As = 1.7% of Ac Our design provides: REINFORCEMENT: Main Bars, Addtl. Main Bars Thor , Links 0.6
Area
9 9 = 10
20 : 20 : of concrete 200
mm mm mm
5 M Long
5M DOWN FROM COL TO TOE LEVEL OF THE PILE: 63.45 M = kN-m 0.6 Use Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3 where hs / h = For the Ultimate State Design, use a load factor of 1.5: 1.5 N 1.5 M = 41.667 ; = 0.441 2 h3 h From Chart 134, CP11O : PART 3, for this condition As = 0% of Ac
115/124
CALCULATION
REF.
9 = 10
20 : of concrete 200
mm mm
3) Calculation of length of Reinforcement: From the theory of an elastic supported beam: Mx = 2 2 e-x EI [ C2 cos x - C1 sin x ] Hx = 2 3 e-x EI [( C1 + C2 ) cos x - ( C1 - C2 ) sinx ] For boundary conditions, when x I Hx = 0, M = Mx = 277.08 1 KN-M
= 6361725124 , cos x = 1, sin x = 0 , e- x = H = = 163.32 KN , = 0.4041 MT C2 = = 0.0048 2 EI 2 1 H C1 = = -0.0117098 ( + M ) 2 EI 2 Mx = 2 28 10 3 0.40 2 6361725124 -0.0117098 ) sin x ) e ( 0.0048 cos x - ( Substituting in the foregoing formula for varying depths in Metres y (x), we obtain the Moment Distribution in the pile as follows: Tabulating for x: In the following table 0 = Ground Level x c Mx cos x sin x e- x Meter 0 1.000 1.000 0.000 258.777 40.497 2 0.446 0.691 0.723 291.158 42.024 4 0.199 -0.046 0.999 127.876 34.324 5 0.133 -0.435 0.901 63.455 31.287 6 0.089 -0.754 0.657 20.909 29.280 8 0.039 -0.996 -0.091 -12.524 27.704 10 0.018 -0.622 -0.783 -11.864 27.735 12 0.008 0.136 -0.991 -4.817 28.067 14 0.003 0.811 -0.586 -0.610 28.265 16 0.002 0.983 0.181 0.581 28.322 18 0.001 0.548 0.836 0.479 28.317 20 0.000 -0.226 0.974 0.180 28.303 22 0.000 -0.860 0.509 0.015 28.295 25 0.000 -0.779 -0.627 -0.025 28.293 As an example of the foregoing calculations stresses, 63.455 the Moment at 5M = KN-M at 5 M = = Nc Ac 1000 /4 M 1 10 600
3 2
c 16.091 14.564 22.264 25.302 27.308 28.885 28.854 28.521 28.323 28.267 28.272 28.286 28.293 28.295
2 63.455 10 6361725124
6
600 2
2 2 6.53 0.54 Or = N/mm N/mm As per BS 8004 Article 7.4.4.3.1: these stresses are < 0.25 fcu or 10 N/mm2 From the above results it can be inferred that stresses in the concrete are acceptable 5 if m long steel is used. However we are providing for full length steel.
116/124
CALCULATION
REF.
O.K
BS 8110, Part 1
5) Check for Clear Spacing: 9 20 For bars of mm dia , C.C spacing 163.116999 mm Therefore clear spacing is Art 3.12.11.2.4 of BS 8110 (Part 1): max clear spacing is 9 Thus bars provided are adequate
143.12 300 mm
Clause 3.12.11
6) Check for Bond Length: Table 3.27 of BS 8110 shows the following values of anchorages for various grades of concrete
2 For fcu 25 = N/mm 32 20 Anchorage length = = 640 We propose mm into the pile cap
640
mm
7) Check for Stirrups: From Table 3.8 BS 8110 (Part 1) , for fcu 0.614 Shear Stress = Vmax = Working Shear Stress in pile =
BS 8110, Part 1
= N/mm
2
25
N/mm
Clause 3.4.5.12
/ 4 2 3 163.3 10 Vw = = 0.5776 0 5776 N/mm2 /4 600 2 As, Vmax < Vw < Vmax / 2 (Table 3.8), applied the minimum steel ratio. 10 200 however we provide nominal mm links Therefore safe. 8) Lateral Reinforcement: As previously shown lateral reinforcement is not required for shear considerations, however buckling should be investigated. Eulers theory gives the minimum force for buckling as F EI 2 eK where E = Youngs modulus for steel =
2
Vw =
Hw
= =
200 64
10 =
kN/m2 7.854E-09 M4
I = Moment of Inertia of the bar eK = Free length to be examined hereunder: Refer to attached sketches on following page. Thus eK 200 = I / 2= / Minimum Force for Buckling is F =
2=
100
mm
2 EI = 1,550 kN 2 eK For this condition, the compressive stress in the bar is F where b = = 4,935 N/mm2 , / 4 b2
20
mm
460 0.7 = 322 N/mm2 The working stress in steel is fya = So for compression, using figure 2 in CF 110 Part 2, if the stress for buckling is higher than the allowable compressive stress, the risk of Buckling does not exist. 4,935 N/mm2 322 N/mm2 ), F = > fya (
117/124
CALCULATION CONCLUSIONS
REF.
5.1
1) Cast In Situ PILE ( = 600, L = 15m ) Capacity - Compression Capacity - Tension Capacity - Lateral Capacity 2) Pile Reinforcement - Longitudinal Reinforcement = - Tie Reinforcement = 9 No. 20 mm (Upper 5.0m Length of Pile) 9 No. 20 mm (The Other Length of Pile) 200 mm D 10 @ = = = 800 500 150 kN kN kN
5.2
1) Cast In Situ PILE ( = 600, L = 18m ) Capacity - Compression Capacity - Tension Capacity - Lateral Capacity 2) Pile Reinforcement - Longitudinal Reinforcement = - Tie Reinforcement = 9 No. 20 mm (Upper 5.0m Length of Pile) 9 No. 20 mm (The Other Length of Pile) 200 mm D 10 @ = = = 800 500 150 kN kN kN
5.3
1) Cast In Situ PILE ( = 600, L = 20m ) Capacity - Compression Capacity - Tension Capacity - Lateral Capacity 2) Pile Reinforcement - Longitudinal Reinforcement = - Tie Reinforcement = 9 No. 20 mm (Upper 5.0m Length of Pile) 9 No. 20 mm (The Other Length of Pile) 200 mm D 10 @ = = = 800 500 150 kN kN kN
5.4
1) Cast In Situ PILE ( = 600, L = 25m ) Capacity - Compression Capacity - Tension Capacity - Lateral Capacity 2) Pile Reinforcement - Longitudinal Reinforcement = - Tie Reinforcement = 9 No. 20 mm (Upper 5.0m Length of Pile) 9 No. 20 mm (The Other Length of Pile) 200 mm D 10 @ = = = 1000 500 150 kN kN kN
118/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
119/124
120/124
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
121/124
PROJECT : SUBJECT :
OLKARIA GPP
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF BOREHOLES
Items
Depth (m)
Sample No. & Type
Sample Details
Modulus of Elasticity Interval Modulus of Elasticity
32.9 45.5 74.2 71.0 93.6 53.2 50.8 77.2 72.1 77.2 37.2 51.9 54.8 66.2 71.0 36.2 57.7 54.8 64.9 80.8 51.0 50.8 66.2 69.9 78.1 32.9 55.0 74.2 72.1 77.2 48.5 50.8 76.2 73.2 73.2 42.6 54.0 71.0 73.2 72.1 43.9 49.6 73.2 76.2 63.5 47.4 55.9 72.1 74.2 57.3 44.5 57.7 69.9 73.2 80.8 39.7 50.8 77.2 97.0 73.2 35.2 43.9 64.9 77.2 75.2 2,400.0 4,000.0 18,000.0 28,000.0 42,000.0 21,000.0 7,200.0 21,000.0 16,000.0 21,000.0 4,800.0 8,000.0 4,000.0 11,000.0 15,000.0 4,200.0 12,800.0 4,000.0 10,000.0 25,000.0 18,000.0 7,200.0 11,000.0 14,000.0 22,000.0 2,400.0 10,400.0 18,000.0 16,000.0 21,000.0 15,000.0 7,200.0 20,000.0 17,000.0 17,000.0 9,000.0 9,600.0 15,000.0 17,000.0 16,000.0 10,200.0 6,400.0 17,000.0 20,000.0 9,000.0 13,800.0 11,200.0 16,000.0 18,000.0 11,480.0 10,800.0 12,800.0 14,000.0 17,000.0 25,000.0 6,600.0 7,200.0 21,000.0 30,000.0 17,000.0 3,600.0 3,200.0 10,000.0 21,000.0 19,000.0
Borehole
From
To
2 5.50 BH-1 10.50 15.00 20.50 2.00 5.50 BH-2 10.50 15.50 20.50 2.00 5.50 BH-3 10.50 15.50 20.50 2.00 5.50 BH-4 10.50 15.50 20.50 2.00 5.50 BH-5 10.50 15.50 20.50 2.00 5.50 BH-6 10.50 15.50 20.50 2.00 5.50 BH-7 10.50 15.50 20.50 2.00 5.50 BH-8 10.50 15.50 20.50 2.00 5.50 BH-9 10.50 15.50 20.50 2.00 5.50 BH-10 10.50 15.50 20.00 2.00 5.50 BH-11 10.50 15.50 20.50 2.00 5.50 DBH-1 10.50 16.00 21.00 2.00 5.50 DBH-2 10.50 15.50 20.50
2.45 5.95 10.95 15.45 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.50 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95 2.45 5.95 10.95 16.45 21.45 2.45 5.95 10.95 15.95 20.95
BH-1-1 BH-1-2 BH-1-3 BH-1-4 BH-1-5 BH-2-1 BH-2-2 BH-2-3 BH-2-4 BH-2-5 BH-3-1 BH-3-2 BH-3-3 BH-3-4 BH-3-5 BH-4-1 BH-4-2 BH-4-3 BH-4-4 BH-4-5 BH-5-1 BH-5-2 BH-5-3 BH-5-4 BH-5-5 BH-6-1 BH-6-2 BH-6-3 BH-6-4 BH-6-5 BH-7-1 BH-7-2 BH-7-3 BH-7-4 BH-7-5 BH-8-1 BH-8-2 BH-8-3 BH-8-4 BH-8-5 BH-9-1 BH-9-2 BH-9-3 BH-9-4 BH-9-5 BH-10-1 BH-10-2 BH-10-3 BH-10-4 BH-10-5 BH-11-1 BH-11-2 BH-11-3 BH-11-4 BH-11-5 DBH-1-1 DBH-1-2 DBH-1-3 DBH-1-4 DBH-1-5 DBH-2-1 DBH-2-2 DBH-2-3 DBH-2-4 DBH-2-5
SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT SPT
4 5 18 35 42 35 9 21 16 21 8 10 4 11 15 7 16 4 10 25 30 9 11 14 22 4 13 18 16 21 25 9 20 17 17 15 12 15 17 16 17 8 17 20 9 23 14 16 18 14 18 16 14 17 25 11 9 21 25 17 6 4 10 21 19
21.9 22.7 29.7 35.5 37.4 35.5 25.4 30.9 28.9 30.9 24.8 26.0 21.9 26.5 28.4 24.2 28.9 21.9 26.0 32.3 34.0 25.4 26.5 28.0 31.2 21.9 27.5 29.7 28.9 30.9 32.3 25.4 30.5 29.3 29.3 28.4 27.0 28.4 29.3 28.9 29.3 24.8 29.3 30.5 25.4 31.6 28.0 28.9 29.7 28.0 29.7 28.9 28.0 29.3 32.3 26.5 25.4 30.9 32.3 29.3 23.5 21.9 26.0 30.9 30.1
1,600.0 2,000.0 7,200.0 14,000.0 16,800.0 14,000.0 3,600.0 8,400.0 6,400.0 8,400.0 3,200.0 4,000.0 1,600.0 4,400.0 6,000.0 2,800.0 6,400.0 1,600.0 4,000.0 10,000.0 12,000.0 3,600.0 4,400.0 5,600.0 8,800.0 1,600.0 5,200.0 7,200.0 6,400.0 8,400.0 10,000.0 3,600.0 8,000.0 6,800.0 6,800.0 6,000.0 4,800.0 6,000.0 6,800.0 6,400.0 6,800.0 3,200.0 6,800.0 8,000.0 3,600.0 9,200.0 5,600.0 6,400.0 7,200.0 5,600.0 7,200.0 6,400.0 5,600.0 6,800.0 10,000.0 4,400.0 3,600.0 8,400.0 10,000.0 6,800.0 2,400.0 1,600.0 4,000.0 8,400.0 7,600.0
122/124
Sampler Type
SPT-N
TITLE : DESIGN CALCULATION - BORED CAST IN-SITU PILE No. CALCULATION REF.
123/124
124/124