UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ATTACHMENT 1 ____________________________________ Leisha Tringali, Plaintiff vs.

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND Hannah Att so A!" Pitter, La rie Mc#rath, &o g Co!fort, &arrin &avis, Mar" Ellen Le!,o (achel -a'rielian, /Mr. Aniliton0, %n2no*n &efen)ants 1-13 &efen)ants 444444444444444444444444444444444444 C$%NT ++ - Notice an) $''ort nit" to ,e Hear) C$%NT +++ - Aggravate) +)entit"Theft C$%NT . - Negligence C$%NT .+ 1 (+C$ C$%NT 1 - &e'rivation of (ights %n)er Color of La* n)er FOR JURY TRIAL Civil Action No.: 1:14-cv-124-LM

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This is a co!'laint for relief n)er 42 %.5.C. 61789, *ith 'en)ant state clai!s against in)ivi) als, *hich gives the )istrict co rt original : ris)iction of an" civil action a thori;e) ," an" 'erson to re)ress the )e'rivation, n)er color of state la*, of an" right sec re) ," the Constit tion of the %nite) 5tates an) to recover )a!ages or other relief for s ch civil rights violations ' rs ant to 28 %.5.C. 61991.

A. <or )eclarator" an) in: nctive relief- &efen)ant=s>, violate) The 'laintiff, Leisha Tringali?s 'rotecte) ) e 'rocess rights ," a 'attern an) 'ractice of cri!inall" e)iting, falsif"ing, an) !ani' lating a te!'orar" chil) s ''ort or)er ," creating a s"nthetic i)entit" then )enie) the 'laintiff the a,ilit" to con) ct an a)!inistrative revie* to )e'rive her of an" !eaningf l re!e)". @. <or )a!ages - &efen)ant=s>, in cons'irac" *ith each other, )e'rive) the 'laintiff of ) e 'rocess an) eA al 'rotection of the la* in the Massach setts ," )en"ing her li,ert" an) illegall" sei;ing her 'ro'ert". C. <or Pen)ant 5tate Clai!- &efen)ant=s>, ," their actions intentionall" interfere) *ith Leisha Tringali?s ' rs it of ha''iness, ," their fra ) lent an) )eceitf l actions ," illegall" !o)if"ing a te!'orar" or)er. 2. B ris)iction for this action is ' rs ant to 28 %.5.C. 61991, as it )eals *ith a civil co!'laint arising n)er the Constit tion an) la*s of the %nite) 5tates, !ore s'ecificall", 42 %.5.C. 61789, an) the 4th, Cth an) 14th A!en)!ents to the %nite) 5tates Constit tion. 9. B ris)iction for this action ' rs ant to Title 28 %.5. Co)e 66 1991 an) 1949. Actions of the )efen)ant=s> has f rther aggrieve) 'laintiff in the state of Ne* Ha!'shire in *hich the 'laintiff resi)es. Therefore, : ris)iction n)er 28 %5C 61992 an) ven e lie *ith this Co rt. 4. B ris)iction of the 'en)ant state clai! is ' rs ant to 28 %.5.C. 619DE, as it is fo n)e) on essentiall" the sa!e fact al fo n)ation. C. The <irst iss e is FConvenienceF an) secon) iss e is the Finterest-of-: sticeF stan)ar) n)er 28 %5CA 143D. PARTIES D. The 'laintiff is a resi)ent of 2 Holl" Lane, Lon)on)err", Ne* Ha!'shire 393C9 an) a citi;en of the %nite) 5tates. E. The )efen)ant Hannah Att so is ,eing s e) in)ivi) all" an) in her official ca'acit" as an e!'lo"ee of the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) Enforce!ent Agenc", her 'rinci'al 'lace of , siness is 133 5"lvan (oa), 133 Tra)e Center, Go, rn, Massach setts 31831. 8. The )efen)ant A!" Pitter is ,eing s e) in)ivi) all" an) in her official ca'acit" as an e!'lo"ee of the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) Enforce!ent Agenc", her 'rinci'al 'lace of , siness is locate) at 133 Ca!,ri)ge 5t. @oston, MA 32114. 7. The )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath is ,eing s e) in)ivi) all" an) in her official ca'acit" as an e!'lo"ee of the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) Enforce!ent Agenc", her 'rinci'al 'lace of , siness is locate) at133 Ca!,ri)ge 5t. @oston, MA 32114. 13. The )efen)ant &o g Co!fort is ,eing s e) in)ivi) all" an) in his official ca'acit" as an e!'lo"ee of the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) Enforce!ent Agenc", his 'rinci'al 'lace of , siness is locate) at

133 5"lvan (oa), 133 Tra)e Center, Go, rn, Massach setts 31831. 11. The )efen)ant &arrin &avis is ,eing s e) in)ivi) all" an) in his official ca'acit" as an e!'lo"ee of the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) Enforce!ent Agenc", his 'rinci'al 'lace of , siness is locate) at 133 5"lvan (oa), 133 Tra)e Center, Go, rn, Massach setts 31831. 12. The )efen)ant Mar" Ellen Le!,o is ,eing s e) in)ivi) all" an) in her official ca'acit" as an e!'lo"ee of the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) Enforce!ent Agenc", her 'rinci'al 'lace of , siness is locate) at at133 Ca!,ri)ge 5t. @oston, MA 32114. 19. The )efen)ant Mr. Anilton is ,eing s e) in)ivi) all" an) in his official ca'acit" as an e!'lo"ee of the Co!!on*ealth of Massach setts EHec stive $ffice of Trans'ortation (egistr" of Motor .ehicles his 'rinci'al 'lace of , siness is locate) at ED (oss Ga", I inc", MA 322D7. 14. The )efen)ant (achel -a'rielian is ,eing s e) in)ivi) all" an) in her official ca'acit" as an e!'lo"ee of the Co!!on*ealth of Massach setts EHec stive $ffice of Trans'ortation (egistr" of Motor .ehicles her 'rinci'al 'lace of , siness is locate) at 13 Par2 Pla;a, 5 ite 41D3. @oston, MA 3211D. 1C. %n2no*n &efen)ant=s>, Bohn &oe=s>, are in)ivi) als *hose i)entities are not "et 2no*n to the 'laintiff, , t *hose actions ca se) sever an) 'er!anent in: r" to the 'laintiff. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1D. There is a *ell )efine) co!! nit" of interest in the A estions of la* an) fact involve) in this case. The A estions of la* an) fact co!!on to the !e!,ers of the Class *hich 're)o!inate over A estions *hich !a" effect in)ivi) al Class !e!,ers incl )e the follo*ing: =+>. Ghether &efen)ant=s> have an) contin e to violate the 'rovisions of the %.5. constit tions in connection *ith 'ost : )g!ent enforce!ent of collection of chil) s ''ortJ an), s'ecificall", the illegal s s'ension of licenses an) the illegal sei; re an) ta2ing of 'rivate 'ro'ert" *itho t ) e 'rocess of la*. =++> Ghether &efen)ant=s> have an) contin e to violate stat tor" reA ire!ents an) stan)ar)s in connection *ith the 'ost : )g!ent enforce!ent of collection of chil) s ''ortJ an), s'ecificall", the illegal s s'ension of licenses an) the illegal sei; re an) ta2ing of 'rivate 'ro'ert" *itho t ) e 'rocess of la*. =+++> Ghether &efen)ant=s> have an) contin e to violate the reA ire!ents an) stan)ar)s of a''lica,le Co rt ( les in connection *ith the 'ost : )g!ent enforce!ent of collection of chil) s ''ortJ an), s'ecificall", the illegal s s'ension of licenses an) the illegal sei; re an) ta2ing of 'rivate 'ro'ert" *itho t ) e 'rocess of la*. =+.> Ghether &efen)ant=s> 2no*, have reason to 2no*, or, rec2lessl" )isregar) a''lica,le constit tional, stat tor" an) r le stan)ar)s, g i)elines, 'rotections, an), reA ire!ents in the co rse of 'ost : )g!ent enforce!ent collection of chil) s ''ortJ an), s'ecificall", the illegal s s'ension of licenses an) the illegal sei; re an) ta2ing of 'rivate 'ro'ert" *itho t ) e 'rocess of la*.

=.> Ghether &efen)ant=s> an) their agents sho l) ,e co!'elle) to acco nt for an) )isgorge illegal 'rofits, 'a"!ents an) reven es generate) fro! an)Kor in the co rse of these illegal an) nconstit tional actionsJ an), s'ecificall", the illegal sei; re an) ta2ing of 'rivate 'ro'ert" *itho t ) e 'rocess of la*. =.+> Ghether &efen)ant=s> an) their agents sho l) ,e co!'elle) to !a2e restit tion for all 'rivate 'ro'ert" illegall" sei;e) an) ta2en in violation of constit tionall" 'rotecte) an) g arantee) rights to ) e 'rocess of la* an)Kor in violation of a''lica,le stan)ar)s an) 'roce) res i!'ose) ," stat te an) co rt r le.

STATEMENT OF CLAIM 1E. No* co!es the 'laintiff in the a,ove entitle) action see2ing )eclarator" an) in: nctive relief as *ell as co!'ensator" an) ' nitive )a!ages against the a,ove na!e) )efen)ant=s> for the har! create) to the 'laintiff ," the nla*f l cri!inal acts n)er the /color of la*0. 18. At iss e in this case is the )efen)ant=s> ' rs it of a)!inistrative enforce!ent actions against the 'laintiff *hich violate) her ) e 'rocess rights n)er the <ifth an) <o rteenth A!en)!ent rights n)er the %.5. Constit tion. 17. The 'laintiff is aggrieve) ," the )efen)ant=s> final )eter!ination regar)ing actions ta2en in collecting an) )is, rsing chil) s ''ort or, regar)ing the 'laintiffLs fail re to co!'l" *ith a s ,'oena, s !!ons, or or)ers in *hich the 'laintiff *as never legall" na!e) as a 'art". 23. $n 5e'te!,er 27, 1778, the Mi))leseH Pro,ate an) <a!il" Co rt = &il)a", B. > !o)ifie) the B )g!ent of &ivorce )ate) A g st 23, 177D. B )g!ent *as entere) in accor)ance *ith a sti' lation )ate) 5e'te!,er 27, 1778 that Matthe* Tringali = ,iological <ather > an) Leisha Tringali = ,iological Mother > shall have :oint legal an) 'h"sical c sto)" n)er case )oc2et 7D& 193C. 21. The 'laintiff asserts that ," incor'orating the c sto)" agree!ent into the : )g!ent of a,sol te )ivorce, it ,eca!e enforcea,le thro gh the co rts, as a vali) 'rovision of the )ecree. =F$nce the co rt )eci)es to incor'orate an agree!ent ,et*een the 'arties as 'art of its )ecretal relief, so!ething *hich it )oes not necessaril" have to )o, 'artic larl" as to 'rovisions relating to chil)ren, the agree!ent is incl )e) *ithin the or)er an) is enforcea,le as a vali) 'rovision of the )ecree.F>.5ee -e!' v. -e!', 28E M). 1DC, 1EC, 411 A.2) 1328 =1783> 22. $n B ne 2C, 2332 the )efen)ant, Hannah Att so file) notice of a''earance for &$(KC5E as co nsel *ith the Mi))leseH Pro,ate an) <a!il" Co rt = &onnnell", B. > The )efen)ant Hannah Att so f rther !otione) the Mi))leseH Pro,ate an) <a!il" Co rt to reA est for financial state!ent against Leisha Esh,ach. M +). 1 N 29. The 'laintiff alleges the )efen)ant, Hannah Att so )enie) ) e 'rocess to the 'laintiff *hen )eci)ing the a!o nt of her chil) s ''ort o,ligation. 24. The 'laintiff alleges ," the )efen)ant, Hannah Att sos fail re to 'rovi)e 'ro'er notice )e'rive)

'laintiff of a f ll an) fair o''ort nit" to ,e hear). As the 5 're!e Co rt so a'tl" *rote: FThe 'oint is straightfor*ar): the & e Process Cla se 'rovi)es that certain s ,stantive rights O life, li,ert", an) 'ro'ert" O cannot ,e )e'rive) eHce't ' rs ant to constit tionall" a)eA ate 'roce) res.F Clevelan) @oar) of E) cation v. Lo )er!ill, 4E3 %.5. C92, C41, 13C 5. Ct. 148E, 1479, 84 L.E).2) 474 =178C>. Those Fconstit tionall" a)eA ate 'roce) resF reA ire notice an) an o''ort nit" to ,e hear). M llane v. Central Hanover @an2 P Tr st Co., 997 %.5. 93D, 919, E3 5.Ct. DC2, DCD-CE, 74 L.E). 8DC =17C3>J Notice ! st ,e Freasona,l" calc late), n)er all the circ !stances, to a''rise intereste) 'arties of the 'en)enc" of the action an) affor) the! an o''ort nit" to 'resent their o,:ections.F M llane, 13C2Q 13C2 997 %.5. at 914, E3 5. Ct. At DCE. Notice ! st ,e Freasona,l" calc late), n)er all the circ !stances, to a''rise intereste) 'arties of the )e'en)enc" of the action an) affor) the! an o''ort nit" to 'resent their o,:ections.F M llane, 13C2Q13C2 997 %.5. at 914, E3 at DCE. 2C. Proce) ral ) e 'rocess )e!an)s that a 'art" affecte) ," govern!ent action ,e given notice an) an o''ort nit" to ,e hear) ,efore ,eing )e'rive) of a 'ro'ert" interest. 2D. The 'laintiff asserts that her legal na!e is Leisha Tringali. Plaintiff f rther asserts that her legal na!e is not no* nor ever *as her na!e Leisha Esh,ach. 2E. The 'laintiff )eclares an" or)er that na!es Leisha Esh,ach can not ,e enforcea,le 'on 'laintiff *itho t violating her ) e 'rocess rights. 28. The 'laintiff asserts that a te!'orar" or)er for chil) s ''ort is classifie) in the ,roa)er categor" of /'en)ente lite0 or)ers. These are co rt or)ers that are te!'oraril" enforce) ntil the en) of trial or co rt 'rocee)ings. 27. $n &ece!,er C, 2339 the Mi))leseH Pro,ate an) <a!il" Co rt = Mc5*een", B. > a''ointe) Peter Tringali 'er!anent g ar)ianshi' *ith c sto)" of the !inor chil) RT n)er )oc2et n !,er 77P C181#M. M +). 2 N 93. The 'laintiff clai!s B )ge Mc5*een" )i) not or)er chil) s ''ort regar)ing of the !inor chil) RT in the &ecree. 91. The 'laintiff asserts an" te!'orar" or)er of s ''ort that the )efen)ants are sing against the 'laintiff *o l) not ,e enforcea,le after the entr" of a final : )g!ent an) or )ecree. 92. The 'laintiff clai!s that it *as the res'onsi,ilit" of the )efen)ant=s> to file for a !o)ification as the 'laintiff contin es to )eclare an" or)er that na!es Leisha Esh,ach can not ,e enforcea,le 'on 'laintiff *itho t violating her ) e 'rocess rights 99. The 'laintiff alleges ," the )efen)ant=s> have contin e) se of a n ll an) voi) or)er that the 'laintiff *ill not recogni;e nor *ill co!'l" *ith as it *as )one *itho t notice, she *as not na!e) an)

f rther!ore has a &ecree that *o l) s 'ercee) an" 'rior te!'orar" or)er. 94. The 'laintiff alleges the unknown defendan !"# *itho t the eH'ress a thori;ation of the 'laintiff transferre) her 'ersonal i)entif"ing infor!ation = 5ocial 5ec rit" N !,er > to o,tain chil) s ''ort 'a"!ents n)er a s"nthetic i)entit" create) ," the unknown defendan !"# ! DTA# 9C. $n or a,o t March 24, 2339 the 'laintiff alleges the unknown defendan !"# &$( levie) S4EC.78 fro! Citi;ens @an2 of Massach setts fro! Leisha Tringali, the 'laintiff?s acco nt. Acco nt n !,er 113778-TTT-T. 9D. $n or a,o t A'ril 2D, 2339 the 'laintiff alleges the unknown defendan !"# &$( interce'te) an ins rance clai! 'a"!ent fro! the 'laintiff in the a!o nt of S192E.C3. 9E. $n or a,o t 5e'te!,er 19, 2339 the 'laintiff alleges the unknown defendan !"# &$( levie) S173D.33 fro! Citi;ens @an2 of Massach setts fro! the 'laintiffUs acco nt. Acco nt N !,er 113778TTT-T. 98. $n 5e'te!,er 19, 233D the 'laintiff faHe) a reA est for an a)!inistrative revie* *ith the &$(KC5E. Plaintiff clearl" state) she *as never given 'ro'er notice. M +). 9 N 97. The 'laintiff reA este) an a)!inistrative revie* *ith the &$(KC5E an) *as never given 'ro'er notice of the o tco!e ," $e unknown defendan !"#. 43. Aro n) $cto,er 233D the 'laintiff alleges the )efen)ant, &o g Co!fort interce'te) an ins rance clai! settle!ent 'a"!ent fro! the 'laintiff in the a!o nt of SC,333.33. M +). 4 N 41. Aro n) $cto,er 233D the 'laintiff alleges the )efen)ant, &o g Co!fort interce'te) another ins rance clai! settle!ent 'a"!ent fro! the 'laintiff in the a!o nt of SC,333.33. M +). C N 42. The 'laintiff affir!s her ,elief that the sei; re of her 'ro'ert" *as 'rohi,ite), inter alia, ," the <o rth A!en)!ent, an) arg es that the sei; re of 'laintiffLs 'rivate 'ro'ert" for ' ,lic se *itho t : st co!'ensation n)er the <ifth A!en)!ent. 49. The )efen)ant, &o g Co!fort is an e!'lo"ee of the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent Agenc". The )efen)ant, &o g Co!fort :o, )escri'tion is Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce 5'ec = C >. His :o, ) ties incl )e , t not li!ite) to as a first level s 'ervisor, a 'reli!inar" f nction as a trainer, an) )oing eH'ert level *or2 ,e"on) the general co!'etencies of the :o,. Training 5'ecialist, for! late 'olic", 'rovi)e technical cons ltations on co!'leH assign!ents, or 'erfor! *or2 at an eH'ert level. Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent 5'ecialists eval ate an) !onitor chil) s ''ort cases

to esta,lish 'aternit" an) to esta,lish, !o)if", an) enforce chil) s ''ort or)ersJ 're'are cases for co rt actionJ ens re co!'liance *ith chil) s ''ort agree!ents an) co rt or)ersJ con) ct research to locate non-c sto)ial 'arents an) i)entif" assetKinco!e availa,le to !eet chil) s ''ort o,ligationsJ research cases involving fail re to 'a" co rt-or)ere) chil) s ''ortJ ens re the acc rac" of case infor!ation ," 'erfor!ing revie*s an) a): sting case infor!ation *hen nee)e)J an) assist c sto)ial an) non-c sto)ial 'arents ," 'rovi)ing infor!ation to the! regar)ing their chil) s ''ort cases thro gh tele'hone calls, in face to face !eetings, or in *riting. 44. $n B ne 19, 2311 the 'laintiff clai!s she *as )enie) the rene*al of her license - o'erating 'rivileges. The Ne* Ha!'shire (egistr" of Motor .ehicles )eclare) that 'laintiff?s right to o'erate *as n)er s s'ension ," the Co!!on*ealth of Massach setts in a National &ata,ase (egistr". 4C. $n B ne 19, 2311 the 'laintiff clai!s she *as )enie) her a''lication for rene*al of her )river?s license in the 5tate of Ne* Ha!'shire *here 'laintiff resi)es. 4D. $n B ne 19, 2311 the 'laintiff clai!s she contacte) the Co!!on*ealth of Massach setts (egistr" of Motor .ehicles = hereinafter the /(M.0 > call center in I inc", Massach setts. The 'laintiff s'o2e *ith an e!'lo"ee na!e) &ere2 An)erson to fin) o t *h" her rene*al *as )enie). 4E. The 'laintiff alleges &ere2 An)erson eH'laine) that on B ne 29, 2313 the (M. receive) a co!' ter generate) notice of s s'ension ," the &$(KC5E. &ere2 An)erson f rther state) that on B l" 9, 2313 'laintiff?s license *ent n)er s s'ension ) e to chil) s ''ort o,ligations. 48. The 'laintiff alleges she eH'laine) to &ere2 An)erson that there is no legal or)er for her to 'a" chil) s ''ort. The chil) s ''ort or)er *as fra ) lent an) as2e) if the" ha) a co'" of sai) or)er. &erre2 An)erson ' t 'laintiff thro gh to his s 'ervisor The )efen)ant, FAniltonF. 47. The 'laintiff alleges she then again eH'laine) to the )efen)ant, Anilton that there is no legal or)er for her to 'a" chil) s ''ort. The chil) s ''ort or)er *as fra ) lent. Plaintiff as2e) if the (M. ha) aco'" of sai) or)er. The )efen)ant, Anilton state) the (M. )i) not have the or)er onl" a co!' ter generate) notice fro! the &$(KC5E. C3. The 'laintiff alleges the )efen)ant, Anilton )i) not lift the s s'ension of the 'laintiff?s license an) A ote) M#L 117 s.1D =,> as his a thorit". Accor)ing to the &$(KC5E, M.#.L. c 117A, 6 1D, gives the! the a thorit" to s s'en)e) a in)ivi) als , siness, tra)e, 'rofessional, recreational or !otor vehicle license or virt all" an" other license or registration that a 'erson has legall" o,taine). C1. The 'laintiff alleges the )efen)ant, Anilton state) /$nce "o have cleare) "o r o tstan)ing o,ligation, "o ! st 'resent the (egistr" of Motor .ehicles *ith an official notice fro! the Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent &ivision of the Massach setts &e'art!ent of (even e, stating that "o are in co!'liance *ith the 'a"!ent 'lan an) are eligi,le or reinstate!ent0. C2. The 'laintiff alleges the )efen)ant, Anilton insin ate) that 'laintiff o*e) chil)-s ''ort *ith no 'roof fro! the &$(KC5E other then a co!' ter generate) letter. C9. $n B ne 29, 2311 the 'laintiff alleges the )efen)ant, (achel -a'rielian, (egistrar of the

Co!!on*ealth of Massach setts EHec stive $ffice of Trans'ortation (egistr" of Motor .ehicles sent Leisha Tringali a notice of s s'ension effective on B l" 9, 2313. M +). D N The 5 're!e B )icial Co rt has Fconstr e) the Voriginal ca seL lang age to !ean an affir!ative act =not a fail re to act> ," a ' ,lic e!'lo"er that creates the Vcon)ition or sit ationL that res lts in har! inflicte) ," a thir) 'art".F 5ee -ent v. Co!!on*ealth, 49E Mass. 912 - Mass: 5 're!e B )icial Co rt 2332 +t is a''ro'riate to consi)er the !agnit )e of the 'otential har! that the )efen)antLs con) ct *o l) have ca se) to its inten)e) victi! if the *rongf l 'lan ha) s ccee)e), as *ell as the 'ossi,le har! to other victi!s that !ight have res lte) if si!ilar f t re ,ehavior *ere not )eterre) - TT$ Pro) ction Cor'. v. Alliance (eso rces Cor'., C37 %5 449 - 5 're!e Co rt 1779 C4. The 'laintiff clai!s that for the )efen)ant=s> (achel -a'rielian an) Anilton to i!'licate an) enforce M.#.L. c 117A, 6 1D, in the !anner in *hich the" chose to enforce against the 'laintiff, *o l) *ith no )o ,t have to violate her rights n)er the Cth, Eth an) 14th A!en)!ents of the %nite) 5tates Constit tion. CC. Altho gh accor)ing to the Co!!on*ealth of Massach setts having a )rivers license is a 'rivilege, the s s'en)ing of a license *itho t a vali) co rt or)er or a hearing on an allegation is a clear violation of one?s ) e 'rocess. CD. The 'laintiff here," asserts an) )eclares that a''lication of M.#.L c. 117A, 6 1D is nconstit tional for the follo*ing reasonsJ = a.> Plaintiff, Leisha Tringali *as never affor)e) a hearing for a chil) s ''ort or)er. = ,.> Plaintiff *as never affor)e) a hearing regar)ing the s s'ension of her )river?s license. CE. %n)er the .++ A!en)!ent ='art of the /@ill of (ights0> of the %nite) 5tates Constit tion it states the follo*ingJ /+n 5 its at co!!on la*, *here the val e in controvers" shall eHcee) t*ent" )ollars, the right of trial ," : r" shall ,e 'reserve), an) no fact trie) ," a : r", shall ,e other*ise re-eHa!ine) in an" Co rt of the %nite) 5tates, than accor)ing to the r les of the co!!on la*.0 C8. The Massach setts Constit tion f rther ,ac2s this A!en)!ent ," stating the follo*ingJ <or this ' r'ose, /MaN right is Uclearl" esta,lishe)? if it !eets one of three tests: =1> it is )efine) *ith reasona,le clarit"J or =2> the 5 're!e Co rt or this Circ it has affir!e) its eHistenceJ or =9> a reasona,le )efen)ant *o l) n)erstan) for! eHisting la* that his acts *ere nla*f l0 Coo2 v. 5hel)on 41 f.9) E9 =2n) Cir. 1774> C7. Tho gh the la* itself ,e fair on its face an) i!'artial in a''earance, "et, if it is a''lie) an) a)!inistere) ," ' ,lic a thorit" *ith an evil e"e an) an neA al han), so as 'racticall" to !a2e n: st

an illegal )iscri!inations ,et*een 'ersons in si!ilar circ !stances, !aterial to their rights, the )enial of eA al : stice is still *ithin the 'rohi,ition of the Constit tion. W+C- G$ v. H$P-+N5, 118 %5 9CD, =188D> D3. /+n all controversies concerning 'ro'ert", an) in all s its ,et*een t*o or !ore 'ersons, eHce't in cases in *hich it has heretofore ,een other *a"s se) an) 'ractice), the 'arties have a right to a trial ," : r"J an) this !etho) of 'roce) re shall ,e hel) sacre), nless, in ca ses arising on the high seas, an) s ch as relate to !arinersL *ages, the legislat re shall hereafter fin) it necessar" to alter it.0 D1. After a caref l eHa!ination of the .++ a!en)!ent an) Article T., no *here )oes it eHe!'t the Co!!on*ealth, o,lige or o,ligor, c sto)ial or non-c sto)ial, h s,an) or *ife, !ale or fe!ale or )oes it !a2e an" s'ecial 'rovision for an" chil)-s ''ort that is allege)l" in the arrears , t to the contrar" it clearl" states ALL controversies. +t has f rther sai): FNot onl" is a ,iase) )ecision !a2er constit tionall" nacce'ta,le , t Vo r s"ste! of la* has al*a"s en)eavore) to 'revent even the 'ro,a,ilit" of nfairness.LF Githro* v. Lar2in, 421 %.5. 9C, 48, 7C 5.Ct. 14CD, 14DC, 49 L.E).2) E12 =17E4>J #i,son v. @err"hill, 411 %5 CD4 5 're!e Co rt 17E9 D2. Consi)ering that the &$(KC5E an) the 'laintiff ha) t*o se'arate o'inions on *hat !ight have ,een o*e) an)K or *ho !ight have o*e) it, that *itho t )o ,t constit te) a controvers" an) for the Co!!on*ealth not to 'rovi)e a : r" trial violate) 'laintiff?s clearl" esta,lishe) constit tional right. D9. <or the (M. to s s'en) the 'laintiff?s )river license or an" other license ," a reA est fro! the &$(KC5E or an" other thir) 'art" *ith no vali) co rt or)er *o l) violate 'laintiff?s ) e 'rocess n)er the <ifth an) <o rteenth A!en)!ent of the %nite) 5tate Constit tion. D4. The <ifthA!en)!ent ='art of the /@ill of (ights0> statesJ /No 'erson shall ,e hel) to ans*er for a ca'ital, or other*ise infa!o s cri!e, nor ,e )e'rive) of life, li,ert", or 'ro'ert", *itho t ) e 'rocess of la*J nor shall 'rivate 'ro'ert" ,e ta2en for ' ,lic se, *itho t : st co!'ensation.0 DC Ghile the <o rteenth A!en)!ent n)er section one statesJ /All 'ersons ,orn or nat rali;e) in the %nite) 5tates an) s ,:ect to the : ris)iction thereof, are citi;ens of the %nite) 5tates an) of the 5tate *herein the" resi)e. No 5tate shall !a2e or enforce an" la* *hich shall a,ri)ge the 'rivileges or i!! nities of citi;ens of the %nite) 5tatesJ nor shall an" 5tate )e'rive an" 'erson of life, li,ert", or 'ro'ert", *itho t ) e 'rocess of la*J nor )en" to an" 'erson *ithin its : ris)iction the eA al 'rotection of the la*s.0 DD. There the 5 're!e Co rt 5ai): The & e 'rocess Cla s entitles a 'erson to an i!'artial an) )isintereste) tri, nal in ,oth civil an) cri!inal cases. This reA ire!ent of ne tralit" in a): )icative 'rocee)ings safeg ar)s the t*o

central concerns of 'roce) ral ) e 'rocess, the 'revention of n: stifie) or !ista2e )e'rivations an) the 'ro!otion of 'artici'ation an) )ialog e ," affecte) in)ivi) al in the )ecision !a2ing 'rocess. The ne tralit" reA ire!ent hel's to g arantee that life, li,ert", or 'ro'ert" *ill not ,e ta2en on the ,asis of an erroneo s or )istorte) conce'tion of the facts or the la*. At the sa!e ti!e, it 'reserves ,oth the a''earance an) realit" of fairness, /generating the feeling, so i!'ortant to a 'o' lar govern!ent, that : stice has ,een )one,0 ," ens ring that no 'erson *ill ,e )e'rive of his intereste) in the a,sence of a 'rocee)ing in *hich he !a" 'resent his case *ith ass rance that the ar,iter is not 're)is'ose) to fin) against hi!. P$(TE( v. 5+N#LETA(W 47 <.9r) 1489 =11th Cir. 177C> I oting Marshall v. Berrico, +nc. 44D %.5. 298, 133 5.Ct. 1D13, D4 L.E) 2n) 182 =1783>. DE. The &$(KC5E are state actors, acting n)er the /color of la*0 the" sho l) have 2no*n that s s'en)ing the 'laintiff?s )river?s license *as an arresta,le offense *hich *o l) ca se her a loss of her li,ert" an) then a loss of her 'ro'ert" )efen)ing these offenses. D8. The 'laintiff again reiterates that accor)ing to the (M. having a )river?s license is a /'rivilege0 an) *ith that sai), the <o rteenth A!en)!ent f rther states thatJ /... No 5tate shall !a2e or enforce an" la* *hich shall a,ri)ge the 'rivileges or i!! nities of citi;ens of the %nite) 5tatesJ0 D7. $n 5e'te!,er 18, 2311 the 'laintiff clai!s she atte!'te) to file a !otion to )is!issKvacate an" an) all chil) s ''ort or)ers against Leisha Esh,ach *ith the Mi))leseH Pro,ate an) <a!il" Co rt n)er )oc2et 7D& 193C. The cler2 of the co rt state) that 'laintiff /co l) not file a !otion to )is!issKvacate ,eca se there *as no vali) or)er in effect0 in the file. E3. The 'laintiff arg es that ,eca se no !otion or !o)ification co l) ,e file) there is no vali) or)er the 'laintiff *o l) ,e na,le to see2 relief n)er an a''eal. E1. $n $cto,er 19, 2311 the 'laintiff !aile) a certifie) )e!an) letter to &o g Co!fort. The 'laintiff raise) the iss e of ) e 'rocess )eclaring 'ro'er service to her has never ,een serve) or or)ere). E2. The 'laintiff asserte) that the &TA create) a s"nthetic i)entit" of Leisha Esh,ach an) the &$(KC5E attache) the 5ocial 5ec rit" N !,er of the 'laintiff to the na!e of Leisha Esh,ach. The 'laintiff asserte) that this *as +)entit" Theft. E9. The 'laintiff !a)e the follo*ing )e!an)s an) that the" ,e !et *ithin 13 , siness )a". E4. The certifie) letters *ere receive) on $cto,er 14, 2311. The 'laintiff?s )e!an)s *ere not !et. EC. $n Ban ar" 17, 2311 the (egister of Pro,ate?s office !aile) 'laintiff a co'" of the te!'orar" chil) s ''ort or)er. ED. $n Ban ar" 2E, 2311 the 'laintiff clai!s she file) a co!'laint *ith the <e)eral Tra)e Co!!ission for +)entit" <ra ). (eference Case X 94DD84CE EE. $n Ban ar" 2E, 2311 the 'laintiff clai!s she file) a cri!inal co!'laint *ith Matthe* A. - les;

fro! the Pelha! Police &e'art!ent. +nci)ent (e'ort +) X 12-131-$<. M +). D N E8. $n March 27, 2312 the 'laintiff file) a <e)eral Co!'laint. The 'laintiff s e) several state agencies an) a state e!'lo"ee for )eclarator" relief, in: nctive relief, an) )a!ages. Plaintiff clai!e) that the )efen)ants violate) her 'roce) ral ) e 'rocess rights ," enforcing a chil) s ''ort or)er against her *itho t 'rovi)ing notice or a hearing. E7. $n A g st 7, 2312 Ba!es 5*een" = Attorne" of (ecor) > file) a Motion to &is!iss for fail re to state clai!. Clai!ing i!! nti" n)er the eleventh a!en)!ent. 83. $n Nove!,er C, 2312 a tele'hone conference *as hel) ,et*een B )ge Pa l B. @ar,a)oro an) Attoen" Ba!es 5*een". Attorne" Ba!es 5*een" *as )irecte) to contact the 'laintiff via letter to arrange a )isc ssion of the case an) 'ossi,ilit" of resolving it. 81. & ring the tele'hone conference B )ge @ar,a)oro states: F (egar)less of *hat the !erits are on the !otion to )is!iss, if that *ere tr e it *o l) see! to !e that the Attorne" #eneralLs $ffice *o l) have interest in tr"ing to eH'lore that !atter *ith her an) tr"ing to resolve it, ,eca se + ass !e the Attorne" #eneralLs $ffice )oesnLt s ''ort govern!ent ta2ings of 'eo'les 'ro'ert" thatLs not o*e). +s that a fair ass !'tionY Attorne" Ba!es 5*een" res'on)s: Wes. M +). E N 82. Plaintiff alleges Attorne" Ba!es 5*een" never contacte) the 'laintiff as )irecte) ," B )ge Pa l B. @ar,a)oro. 89. $n Nove!,er 19, 2312 The co rt grante) the )efen)ants? !otion to )is!iss. The co rt fo n) that the state agencies an) the state e!'lo"ee acting in his official ca'acit" *ere i!! ne fro! clai!s for )a!ages an) other retros'ective relief n)er the Eleventh A!en)!ent, re:ecting 'laintiff?s arg !ent that the state *aive) Eleventh A!en)!ent i!! nit" ," acce'ting fe)eral f n)s n)er the 5ocial 5ec rit" Act. The co rt also fo n) that all clai!s against the state e!'lo"ee in his official an) in)ivi) al ca'acities *ere ,arre) ,eca se the 'laintiff faile) to sho* that the e!'lo"ee *as a 'roHi!ate ca se of the constit tional violations 'laintiff allege) or has the 'o*er to i!'le!ent the relief she see2s. 84. $n B ne 4, 2319 the 'laintiff alleges the )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath sent notice to the 'laintiff that her &e'art!ent ha) iss e) a ne* +nco!e $r)erK Notice of 5 ''ort.M +). 8 N 8C. The )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath is the &e' t" Co!!issioner for &$(. 8D. The )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath intentionall" retaliate) against 'laintiff ," sen)ing s ch notice 2no*ing that there *as a 'en)ing case that *as n)er revie* *ith the <irst Circ it Co rt of A''eals an) that Leisha Tringali *as s ing her )e'art!ent for 5"nthetic +)entit" Theft an) 2no*ing this *o l) ca se har! to Leisha Tringali. 8E. $n or a,o t B ne C, 2319 the 'laintiff clai!s she contacte) several e!'lo"ees fro! the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent &ivision an) *as referre) to the &istrict Attorne"Ls $ffice as the" ref se) to 'rovi)e the 'laintiff *ith an" infor!ation in *hich has no* ,een altere) na!ing the

'laintiff, Leisha Tringali on their case file. 88. The 'laintiff clai!s she left the )efen)ant &arrin &avis a voice !ail !essage. 87. The 'laintiff clai!s she ac2no*le)ge) that the )efen)ant &arrin &avis *as assigne) to the case in *hich she is na!e). 73. The 'laintiff asserte) her right to access ," !eans of a P+N n !,er to gain access to the recor)s so she co l) vie* all of the !onies that ha) ,een illeagll" ta2en fro! her, stating that recor)s sho l) ,e !a)e availa,le to 'laintiff as her na!e is no* liste) on the case as of this "ear. 71. The )efen)ant &arrin &avis )i) not ret rn 'laintiffLs call nor )i) he 'rovi)e the )oc !ents in *hich 'laintiff is entitle). 72. The )efen)ant &arrin &avis :o, )escri'tion is Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce 5'ec = AK@ >. His :o, ) ties incl )e , t not li!ite) to Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent 5'ecialists eval ate an) !onitor chil) s ''ort cases to esta,lish 'aternit" an) to esta,lish, !o)if", an) enforce chil) s ''ort or)ersJ 're'are cases for co rt actionJ ens re co!'liance *ith chil) s ''ort agree!ents an) co rt or)ersJ con) ct research to locate non-c sto)ial 'arents an) i)entif" assetKinco!e availa,le to !eet chil) s ''ort o,ligationsJ research cases involving fail re to 'a" co rt-or)ere) chil) s ''ortJ ens re the acc rac" of case infor!ation ," 'erfor!ing revie*s an) a): sting case infor!ation *hen nee)e)J an) assist c sto)ial an) non-c sto)ial 'arents ," 'rovi)ing infor!ation to the! regar)ing their chil) s ''ort cases thro gh tele'hone calls, in face to face !eetings, or in *riting. 79. The )efen)ant &arrin &avis faile) in his ) ties to ens re the acc rac" of the case infor!ation ," 'erfor!ing revie*s an) a): sting case infor!ation *hen nee)e) an) assist the 'laintiff ," 'rovi)ing infor!ation regar)ing the chil) s ''ort cases thro gh tele'hone calls, in face to face !eetings, or in *riting. 74. The 'laintiff clai!s she left a voice !ail !essage for the )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath on her )irect line. The )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath )i) not ret rn the 'laintiffLs call. 7C. The )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath is associate) *ith Massach setts &e'art!ent of (even e *ith the role of &e' t" Co!!issioner, A )it &ivision. 7D. The 'laintiff clai!s she left a voice !ail !essage for the )efen)ant A!" Pitter on her )irect line. The )efen)ant A!" Pitter )i) not ret rn the 'laintiffLs call. 7E. The )efen)ant A!" Pitter is an e!'lo"ee of the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent Agenc". 78. The )efen)ant A!" Pitter serves as Co!!issioner of the &e'art!ent of (even e. 5he is res'onsi,le for overseeing &$( e!'lo"ees in offices across the state *ho *or2 in chil) s ''ort enforce!ent.

77. P rs ant to M.#.L. 117A s. 13A =c > the )efen)ant A!" Pitter failer to )eter!ine if the 'laintiff ha) inc rre) ,an2 or si!ilar fees as a )irect res lt of a)!inistrative error ," the +.-& agenc", the +.-& agenc" !a", at the )iscretion of the co!!issioner, rei!, rse the o,ligee or o,ligor for the fees fro! the acco nt esta,lishe) ' rs ant to 'aragra'h =9> of section 13. 133. P rs ant to M.#.L. 117A s. 13A = , > the )efen)ant A!" Pitter failer to )eter!ine if the 'laintiff that the +.-& agenc" has )istri, te) a 'a"!ent to an in)ivi) al o,ligee that *as not a chil) s ''ort collection on ,ehalf of the o,ligee, or that the o,ligee *as other*ise not entitle) to the 'a"!ent, the +.-& agenc" shall !a2e )iligent efforts to recover the 'a"!ent fro! the o,ligee, incl )ing )e) cting the a!o nt, or a 'ortion thereof, fro! f t re collections of chil) s ''ort !a)e on ,ehalf of the o,ligee. (ecovere) a!o nts shall ,e 'lace) in the acco nt esta,lishe) ' rs ant to 'aragra'h =1> of section 13. Ghere the +.-& agenc" )oes not recover the 'a"!ent, the +.-& agenc" !a" iss e a ref n) of an over'a"!ent to an o,ligor, or a re'lace!ent 'a"!ent to an in)ivi) al o,ligee on *hose ,ehalf the chil) s ''ort collection *as !a)e, fro! the acco nt esta,lishe) ' rs ant to 'aragra'h =9> of sai) section 13. 131. The 'laintiff asserts ," the )efen)ant A!" Pitter o*n negligence to !a2e that )eter!ination has allo*e) har! to contin e to the 'laintiff an) !a)e no atte!'t to recover an) ref n) the 'laintiffs !one" in *hich *as ta2en ," fra ). 132. The )efen)ant=s> &arrin &avis, La rie Mc#rath an) A!" Pitter cons'ire) ," all failing to 'rovi)e the 'laintiff access to the recor) in *hich their &e'art!ent ha) her liste) as a client an) in *hich she is entitle). 139. @" failing to 'rovi)e the 'laintiff access to the recor) har!e) an) contin es to har! the 'laintiff ," altere) recor)s in *hich the 'laintiff !a)e clear to each an) ever" one of the )efen)ant=s> *as )one ," fra ). 134. $n B ne 4, 2319 the )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath sent notice to the 'laintiff that her &e'art!ent ha) iss e) a ne* +nco!e $r)erK Notice of 5 ''ort. 13C. The )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath is associate) *ith Massach setts &e'art!ent of (even e *ith the role of &e' t" Co!!issioner. 13D. The )efen)ant La rie Mc#rath intentionall" retaliate) against 'laintiff ," sen)ing s ch notice 2no*ing that this case *as n)er revie* *ith the first circ it co rt of a''eals an) that the 'laintiff *as s ing her )e'art!ent for 5"nthetic +)entit" Theft an) 2no*ing this *o l) ca se har! to the 'laintiff. M +). 7 N 13E. The 5 're!e B )icial Co rt has Fconstr e) the Voriginal ca seL lang age to !ean an affir!ative act =not a fail re to act> ," a ' ,lic e!'lo"er that creates the Vcon)ition or sit ationL that res lts in har! inflicte) ," a thir) 'art".F 5ee -ent v. Co!!on*ealth, 49E Mass. 912 - Mass: 5 're!e B )icial Co rt 2332 138. +t is a''ro'riate to consi)er the !agnit )e of the 'otential har! that the )efen)antLs con) ct *o l) have ca se) to its inten)e) victi! if the *rongf l 'lan ha) s ccee)e), as *ell as the 'ossi,le har! to other victi!s that !ight have res lte) if si!ilar f t re ,ehavior *ere not )eterre) - TT$

Pro) ction Cor'. v. Alliance (eso rces Cor'., C37 %5 449 - 5 're!e Co rt 1779 137. $n B ne 11, 2319 the %nite) 5tates Co rt of A''eals <or the <irst Circ it entere) B )g!ent essentiall" for the reason given ," the &istrict Co rt in itLs !e!oran) ! an) or)er )ate) Nove!,er 19, 2312, the : )g!ent of the &istrict Co rt *as affir!e). 113. $n B ne 21, 2319 the 'laintiff sent a )isclos re reA est to Attorne" Ba!es 5*een" for the )istrict Attorne"Ls $ffice an) car,on co'ie) the )efen)ant A!" Pitter of the the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent &ivision. Enclose) 'laintiff inserte) a signe) release for recor)s as 'rovi)e) ," the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent &ivisionLs *e,site. 111. The 'laintiff clai!s as to )ate no )isclos res have ,een affor)e) to the 'laintiff. 112. The 'laintiff *as see2ing f ll )isclos re fro! the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent &ivisionLs recor)s. Encl )e) , t not li!ite) to the follo*ing: 119. The 'laintiff asserte) that it is not her 'olic" to neither recogni;e nor )eal *ith illegal or)ers that are at ,est n ll an) voi), < rther stating she that *o l) not co!l" *ith an" reA est fro! the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent &ivision ntil the &e'art!ent can 'rovi)e a certif" co'" *here the 'laintiff, Leisha Tringali ha) ,een or)ere) to 'a" chil) s ''ort - in *hich the" can not. Plaintiff fore*arne) that an" an) all )oc !ents sent to the 'laintiff ," &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent &ivision *ill ,e ta2en as a )irect threat of har!. 114. $n B l" 8, 2319 the 'laintiff receive) a letter fro! the 5tate of Ne* Ha!'shire &e'art!ent of Health an) H !an 5ervices &ivision of Chil) 5 ''ort. 11C. Githin the )oc !ents it states that The &ivision of Chil) 5 ''ort 5ervices = &C55 > has file) a 'etition *ith the co rt to register 'laintiffs chil) s ''ort or)er iss e) ," the 5tate of Massach setts for the ' r'ose of enforcing the or)er. 11D. A (egistration 5tate!ent *as enclose). $n this recor) the na!es of Leisha Tringali an) Leisha Esh,ach *ere na!e) to i)entif" the !otherLs infor!ation. 11E. The (egistration 5tate!ent *as signe) ," the )efen)ant Mar" Ellen Le!,o on B ne 17, 2319 n)er the 'enalit" of 'er: r" that all infor!ation an) facts concerning arrearage accr e) n)er this or)er *ere tr e to the ,est of her 2no*le)ge an) ,elief. M +). 13 N 118. The )efen)ant Mar" Ellen Le!,o is an e!'lo"ee of the &e'art!ent of (even e Chil) 5 ''ort Enforce!ent Agenc". 117. The 5 're!e B )icial Co rt has Fconstr e) the Voriginal ca seL lang age to !ean an affir!ative act =not a fail re to act> ," a ' ,lic e!'lo"er that creates the Vcon)ition or sit ationL that res lts in har! inflicte) ," a thir) 'art".F 5ee -ent v. Co!!on*ealth, 49E Mass. 912 - Mass: 5 're!e B )icial Co rt 2332 123. +t is a''ro'riate to consi)er the !agnit )e of the 'otential har! that the )efen)antLs con) ct

*o l) have ca se) to its inten)e) victi! if the *rongf l 'lan ha) s ccee)e), as *ell as the 'ossi,le har! to other victi!s that !ight have res lte) if si!ilar f t re ,ehavior *ere not )eterre) - TT$ Pro) ction Cor'. v. Alliance (eso rces Cor'., C37 %5 449 - 5 're!e Co rt 1779 121. $n B l" 2D, 2319 'laintiff Motione) to Contest .ali)it" of (egistere) $r)er. M +). 11 N 122. $n $cto,er 4, 2319 Pegg" (ossing, EsA 5taff Attorne" for the &ivision of Chil) 5 ''ort 5ervices = Ne* Ha!'shire > file) a Motion to Gith)ra* (egistration of <oreign $r)er as the 'laintiff 'rovi)e) 'roof that she has challenge) the vali)it" of the &e'art!ent = Massach setts &$( > atte!'te) to register. The Ne* Ha!'shire &e'art!ent )i) not *ish to 'rocee) ntil the iss es *ere resolve) in Massach setts.M +). 12 N CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

The 'laintiff is a 'rose litigant *ith no legal e) cation to assist in )rafting of her 'lea)ing an) 'lea)s *ith this co rt to hol) her 'lea)ings less stringent stan)ar)s an) constr e her filings li,erall". Plaintiff ,rings forth the follo*ing co nts an) allegations s ''orting her ca se of action:

DEPERVATION OF RI%HTS UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW UNDER T& 'e ()* U+S+C+* Se, &on -.-

The 'rece)ing 'aragra'hs are here," incor'orate) herein as tho gh f ll" set forth an) are !a)e a 'art of this 'aragra'h. At all ti!es relevant herein, the con) ct of all &efen)ants *ere s ,:ect to the fe)eral an) state civil rights acts. The 'laintiff affir!s her ,elief that the sei; re of her 'ro'ert" *as 'rohi,ite), inter alia, ," the <o rth A!en)!ent, an) arg es that the sei; re of 'laintiffLs 'rivate 'ro'ert" for ' ,lic se *itho t : st co!'ensation n)er the <ifth A!en)!ent. Ghoever, n)er color of an" la*, stat te, or)inance, reg lation, or c sto!, *illf ll" s ,:ects an" 'erson in an" 5tate, Territor", Co!!on*ealth, Possession, or &istrict to the )e'rivation of an" rights, 'rivileges, or i!! nities sec re) or 'rotecte) ," the Constit tion or la*s of the %nite) 5tates All &efen)ant=s> acte) n)er color of la* , t contrar" to la*, an) intentionall" an) nreasona,l" )e'rive) Leisha Tringali of rights, 'rivileges, an) i!! nities sec re) ," the Constit tion, la*s of the %nite) 5tates, an) 42 %.5.C. 6 1789, incl )ing:

=a> The 'laintiffLs right not to ,e )e'rive) of 'ro'ert" *itho t ) e 'rocess of la*, as g arantee) ," A!en)!ents . an) T+. of the %nite) 5tates Constit tion. =,> The 'laintiffLs right not to ,e )e'rive) of li,ert" *itho t ) e 'rocess of la*, as g arantee) ," A!en)!ents . an) T+. of the %nite) 5tates Constit tion. T$e/efo/e the Plaintiff )e!an)s : )g!ent against all &efen)ant=s>, for co!'ensator" an) ' nitive )a!ages in *hatever a!o nt the : r" !a" )eter!ine, 'l s costs, interest, ' rs ant to 42 %.5.C. 6 1788.

NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO 0E HEARD A1end1en " V and 2IV of $e Un& ed S a e" Con" & u &on

The 'rece)ing 'aragra'hs are here," incor'orate) herein as tho gh f ll" set forth an) are !a)e a 'art of this 'aragra'h. At all relevant ti!es herein, Plaintiffs ha) a right n)er the ) e 'rocess cla ses of the state an) fe)eral constit tions not to ,e )e'rive) ," the govern!ent of her constit tionall" 'rotecte) interest. %.5.C.A. Const.A!en). 4 P14J M.#.L.A. Const. Pt. 1, Art. 13. Plaintiff is aggrieve) ," the )efen)antLs final )eter!ination regar)ing actions ta2en in collecting an) )is, rsing chil) s ''ort. Proce) ral ) e 'rocess )e!an)s that a 'art" affecte) ," govern!ent action ,e given notice an) an o''ort nit" to ,e hear) ,efore ,eing )e'rive) of a 'ro'ert" interest. The )efen)ant=s> faile) to affor) either of these as'ects of ) e 'rocess to 'laintiff *hen )eci)ing the a!o nt of her chil) s ''ort o,ligation. Plaintiff alleges she *as )e'rive) of a f ll an) fair o''ort nit" to ,e hear). As the 5 're!e Co rt so a'tl" *rote: FThe 'oint is straightfor*ar): the & e Process Cla se 'rovi)es that certain s ,stantive rights O life, li,ert", an) 'ro'ert" cannot ,e )e'rive) eHce't ' rs ant to constit tionall" a)eA ate 'roce) res.0 T lsa Professional Collection 5ervices v. Po'e 48C %.5. 4E8, 138 5. Ct 1943, 1944, 77 L.E).2) CDC =1788>F The 'laintiffLs co!'laint is ,ase) 'on notice an) an o''ort nit" to ,e hear). The )efen)ant, &$(KC5E has an) contin es to har! 'laintiff thro gh fra ) ," the se of te!'orar" chil) s ''ort or)er in *hich the 'laintiff is not na!e). P rs ant to <e).(.Civ.P. D3=,>, alleging that the te!'orar" chil) s ''ort or)er *as o,taine) thro gh fra ).

5 ch a fra ) s ffices as a ,asis to set asi)e the te!'orar" chil) s ''ort or)er n)er <.(.C.P. D3=,>. Plaintiffs res'ectf ll" reA est that the Co rt grant her relief n)er <.(.C.P. D3=,>

T$e/efo/e the Plaintiff )e!an)s : )g!ent against all &efen)ant=s>,P rs ant to <e).(.Civ.P. D3=,> set asi)e the te!'orar" chil) s ''ort , for co!'ensator" an) ' nitive )a!ages in *hatever a!o nt the : r" !a" )eter!ine, 'l s costs, interest, ' rs ant to 42 %.5.C. 6 1788, an), granting s ch other f rther relief that n)er the circ !stances !a" see! a''ro'riate to this Honora,le Co rt.

A%%ERVATED IDENTY THEFT UNDER () USC (3-)A!a#!(# 4 !-# The 'rece)ing 'aragra'hs are here," incor'orate) herein as tho gh f ll" set forth an) are !a)e a 'art of this 'aragra'h. At all ti!es relevant herein, the con) ct of all &efen)ants *ere s ,:ect to the fe)eral an) state civil rights acts. The &efen)ants are :ointl" an) severall" res'onsi,le an) lia,le for )isgorging all !one" that the" *rongf ll" o,taine) thro gh their illegal con) ct, an) for restoring s ch !one" to the Plaintiff, 'l s 're-: )g!ent an) 'ost-: )g!ent interest. THEREFORE, the Plaintiff )e!an)s that B )g!ent ,e entere) in her favor an) against the &efen)ants: or)ering the &efen)ants, to rei!, rse to the Plaintiff the a!o nts of !one" the" have collecte) in the a!o nt of S19,E37.48 granting her 're-: )g!ent an) 'ost-: )g!ent interestsJ a*ar)ing her a reasona,le a!o nt for attorne"s? fees, 'l s the costs of this actionJ an), granting s ch other f rther relief that n)er the circ !stances !a" see! a''ro'riate to this Honora,le Co rt.

NE%LI%ENT SECURITY OF PERSONAL INFORMATION The 'rece)ing 'aragra'hs are here," incor'orate)herein as tho gh f ll" set forth an) are !a)e a 'art of this 'aragra'h. At all ti!es relevant herein, the con) ct of all &efen)ants *ere s ,:ect to the fe)eral an) state civil rights acts. Plaintiff clai!s for negligent sec rit" of 'ersonal infor!ation are ,ase) on the theor" that acc rate 'ersonal i)entif"ing infor!ation is the 2e" that allo*s access to a 'ersonLs financial acco nts an) cre)it. The )efen)ant=s> *ho !aintain s ch infor!ation in the nor!al co rse of , siness have a legal ) t" to reasona,l" safeg ar) that infor!ation fro! ,eing se) for an illegiti!ate ' r'ose. This clai! is analogo s to a 're!ises lia,ilit" clai! for negligent sec rit" res lting in cri!inal activit".

The 'laintiff clai!s, the )efen)ant=s> are allege) to have faile) to ta2e reasona,le 'reca tions to 'rotect the 'laintiff fro! foreseea,le in: ries ca se) ," the agenc" in *hich the )efen)ant=s> *or2 or ," a thir) 'art". All 'ersons have a ) t" to eHercise reasona,le care not to s ,:ect others to an nreasona,le ris2 of har!. See Galls v. $Hfor) Manage!ent Co., 19E NH DC9 - NH: 5 're!e Co rt 1779 Ghether a )efen)antLs con) ct creates a ris2 of har! to others s fficientl" foreseea,le to charge the )efen)ant *ith a ) t" to avoi) s ch con) ct is a A estion of la*, 14C N.H. 173, 179 =2333>, ,eca se Fthe eHistence of a ) t" )oes not arise solel" fro! the relationshi' ,et*een the 'arties, , t also fro! the nee) for 'rotection against reasona,l" foreseea,le har!.F149 N.H. 238, 211 =1778> =A otation o!itte)>. Th s, in so!e cases, a 'art"Ls actions give rise to a ) t". 19E N.H. at DCD. Parties o*e a ) t" to those thir) 'arties foreseea,l" en)angere) ," their con) ct *ith res'ect to those ris2s *hose li2elihoo) an) !agnit )e !a2e the con) ct nreasona,l" )angero s. 149 N.H. at 211.

Ghen 'ro'ert" is sei;e) ," a state an) then re!an)e) to the c sto)" of the %nite) 5tates, the fe)eral agenc" receiving the 'ro'ert" ! st 'rovi)e notice of the sei; re to an" intereste) 'arties *ithin 73 )a"s of the )ate of the initial sei; re. 18 %.5.C. 6 789=a>=1>=A>=iv>. The &efen)ant=s> acte) n)er color of la* , t contrar" to la*, an) intentionall" an) nreasona,l" )e'rive) Leisha Tringali of rights, 'rivileges, an) i!! nities sec re) ," the Constit tion, la*s of the %nite) 5tates, an) 42 %.5.C. 6 1789, incl )ing: As a )irect an) 'roHi!ate res lt of the acts an)Kor o!issions of all )efen)ant=s> as state) *ithin this Co!'laint, The 'laintiff, Leisha Tringali s ffere) in: ries an) )a!ages, incl )ing, , t not li!ite) to: =a.> Loss of li,ert", 'ro'ert" an) cherishe) constit tional rightsJ. =,.> E!otional )istress, h !iliation, o trage, in)ignit", ang ish, an) shoc2J =c.> &a!age to her re' tationJ =).> Attorne" fees an) costsJ =e.> Econo!ic loss =f.> $ther )a!ages c rrentl" nascertaina,le T$e/efo/e the Plaintiff )e!an)s : )g!ent against all &efen)ant=s>, for co!'ensator" an) ' nitive )a!ages in *hatever a!o nt the : r" !a" )eter!ine, 'l s costs, interest, ' rs ant to 42 %.5.C. 6 1788, an), granting s ch other f rther relief that n)er the circ !stances !a" see! a''ro'riate to this Honora,le Co rt.

RICO The 'rece)ing 'aragra'hs are here," incor'orate)herein as tho gh f ll" set forth an) are !a)e a 'art of this 'aragra'h.

At all ti!es relevant herein, the con) ct of all &efen)ants *ere s ,:ect to the fe)eral an) state civil rights acts. The )efen)ants constit te an illegal enter'rise in acts or threat of acts in violation of Civil (ico <e)eral (ac2eteering Act %5C 18, 17D1-17D9 et seA. The follo*ing are 'artic lar violations: =a> 18 %5C 1331: <ra ) The )efen)ant=s> 2no*ingl" an) *illf ll" falsifie) )oc !ents an) or !a)e se of all false )oc !ents 2no*ing the sa!e containe) fro! a fra ) lent )oc !ents.

=,> 18 %5C 17C1: +nterference *ith interstate co!!erce The )efen)ant=s> ro,,e) the 'laintiff of her 'ersonal 'ro'ert" against her *ill ," !eans of act al an) or threatene) force to her 'ersonal 'ro'er" an) li,ert". The )efen)ant=s> engage) in nla*f l acts thro gh a 'attern of collection of an nla*f l )e,t to acA ire or !aintain )irectl" or in)irectl" an interest in the 'laintiffLs 'ersonal 'ro'ert" an) li,erties. The Plaintiff ,ring this action see2ing re)ress for the illegal acts of the &efen)ants, *hich have res lte) in a loss of her 'ro'ert", an) for )eclarator" an) in: nctive relief to en) those 'ractices an) 'revent f rther losses. T$e/efo/e the Plaintiff )e!an)s : )g!ent against all &efen)ant=s>, for co!'ensator" an) ' nitive )a!ages in *hatever a!o nt the : r" !a" )eter!ine, 'l s costs, interest, ' rs ant to 42 %.5.C. 6 1788, an), granting s ch other f rther relief that n)er the circ !stances !a" see! a''ro'riate to this Honora,le Co rt.

PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DECLARATORY JUD%MENT The 'rece)ing 'aragra'hs are here," incor'orate) herein as tho gh f ll" set forth an) are !a)e a 'art of this 'aragra'h. A 'er!anent in: nction an) a )eclarator" : )g!ent *ill serve the 'laintiffLs interest in ' tting an en) to the &efen)ant=s> fra ) lent con) ct, *here the", 2no*ingl", intentionall" an) *illf ll", fra ) lentl" collecte) an) contin e to atte!'t to collect f n)s fro! the 'laintiff. The &efen)ants? nla*f l con) ct, if allo*e) to 'revail, *ill ca se the Plaintiff 'er!anent irre'ara,le in: r". The in: ries to the Plaintiff far o t*eigh an" har! *hich !a" ,e ca se) to )efen)ant=s> sho l) the Co rt grant the in: nctive relief.

A 'er!anent in: nction an) a )eclarator" : )g!ent *ill serve that the Plaintiff *ill not ,e s ,:ecte) to the &efen)ants? nla*f l con) ct an) *ill not ,e )e'rive) of her 'ersonal 'ro'ert". T$e/efo/e the Plaintiff )e!an)s a 'er!anent in: nction an) a )eclarator" : )g!ent against all &efen)ant=s>

PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, it is res'ectf ll" reA este) that B )g!ent ,e entere) ," this Honora,le Co rt in favor of the Plaintiff an) severall" against the &efen)ants: A. #ranting the Plaintiff all the !onetar" co!'ensations an) eA ita,le relief reA este) in the co!'laint. @. +!'osing 'on the &efen)ants the 'a"!ent of all costs an) eH'enses to ,e inc rre) in this la*s it. C. #ranting the Plaintiff reasona,le attorne"s? fees. Pro se litigants !a" ,e entitle) to Attorne" fees an) costs n)er the Civil (ights Attorne"Ls <ee A*ar) Act of 17ED, 73 5tat. 2D41, as a!en)e) 42 %5C 1788 &. The iss ance of a 'er!anent in: nction an) )eclarator" : )g!ent ,arring the &efen)ant=s> contin e) con) ct an) 'ractices. E. #ranting the Plaintiff an" other relief that she !a" ,e entitle) to as a !atter of la*. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL The Pro 5e Plaintiff, Leisha Tringali, )e!an)s a trial ," : r" on all iss es so tria,le. %n)er the .++ A!en)!ent ='art of the /@ill of (ights0> of the %nite) 5tates Constit tion it states the follo*ingJ /+n 5 its at co!!on la*, *here the val e in controvers" shall eHcee) t*ent" )ollars, the right of trial ," : r" shall ,e 'reserve), an) no fact trie) ," a : r", shall ,e other*ise re-eHa!ine) in an" Co rt of the %nite) 5tates, than accor)ing to the r les of the co!!on la*.0

NOTICE OF INTENT Plaintiff, Leisha Tringali here," gives notice that she inten)s to rel" 'on s ch other an) f rther

evi)ence as !a" ,eco!e availa,le or a''arent ) ring trial in this action, an) here," reserves the right to a!en) her Co!'laint an) to assert an" s ch evi)ence ," a''ro'riate !otion.

STATEMENT OF VERIFICATION + have rea) the a,ove co!'laint an) it is correct to the ,est of !" 2no*le)ge.

&ate: 444444444444444444444 44444444444444444444444444444444 Leisha &. Tringali = Pro 5e >