Professional Documents
Culture Documents
y
a
s
h
(
s
o
u
r
c
e
:
T
P
S
,
B
a
d
a
r
p
u
r
)
P
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
s
i
z
e
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
(
%
n
e
r
b
y
w
e
i
g
h
t
)
S
i
z
e
(
j
)
3
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
7
5
.
4
6
4
.
0
4
9
.
7
6
4
0
.
9
4
3
6
.
1
0
2
3
.
5
8
1
7
.
2
4
1
2
.
5
7
9
.
1
0
4
.
2
5
%
n
e
r
1
0
0
9
7
.
2
9
0
.
1
8
5
.
8
6
9
.
8
6
3
.
1
0
6
0
.
4
4
5
5
.
1
2
4
2
.
6
6
2
8
.
4
4
1
6
.
0
8
.
3
3
4
.
2
3
S
e
t
t
l
i
n
g
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
o
f
t
h
e
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
(
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
C
n
=
3
0
.
0
%
b
y
w
t
.
)
T
i
m
e
(
m
i
n
)
0
1
/
4
1
/
2
1
1
.
5
2
5
1
0
2
0
4
0
8
0
1
4
4
0
%
S
e
t
t
l
e
d
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
3
0
.
0
3
0
.
6
1
3
1
.
0
3
1
.
2
5
3
1
.
9
1
3
2
.
0
3
3
.
3
0
3
5
.
0
4
0
.
6
0
5
0
.
8
5
5
8
.
0
5
8
.
0
p
H
v
a
l
u
e
(
u
n
-
s
i
e
v
e
d
s
a
m
p
l
e
)
%
C
n
(
b
y
w
t
.
)
5
0
6
0
6
5
7
0
p
H
7
.
1
5
7
.
1
2
7
.
1
2
7
.
1
2
S
p
e
c
i
c
g
r
a
v
i
t
y
o
f
y
a
s
h
(
u
n
s
i
e
v
e
d
)
=
1
.
9
9
2
;
w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d
m
e
a
n
d
i
a
m
e
t
e
r
,
J
n
m
=
4
0
,
J
5
0
=
2
5
.
275
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
276 S. Chandel et al.
the y ash sample is 300m and 85% by weight is below 75 microns. In the
sample of the y ash, 85.8% particles are ner than 74m. The weighted mean
size (J
nm
) and the J
50
of the y ash particles are 40 and 25m respectively,
which show that the y ash particles are largely in the category of ne particles.
The static settled concentration is also a very important parameter as it decides the
highest limit of solid concentration that can be achieved by gravitational settling.
The maximum static settled concentration of the y ash slurry is 58% by weight.
By the use of bypass line and stirrer, a concentration of more than 58% was
achieved. A Weissenberg rheogoniometer (model R 18, M/s. Sangmo Control Ltd.,
U.K.) was used for obtaining the relation between rate of shear and the shear stress
of the y ash slurries at 50, 60, 65, 68, and 70% concentration (by weight) with and
without additive. The additive used is a mixture of sodium carbonate and Henko
detergent in the ratio 5:1. The additive concentration used is 0.2% by weight of
the total slurry. The rate of shear during most of the measurement was varied in the
range from 20 to 120s
1
. These ranges correspond to the magnitudes of shear rates
expected in slurry pipeline transportations.
Analytical Method for Prediction of Pressure Drop
The most important parameter for prediction of pressure drop is the friction
factor, which is dependent on the pipe Reynolds number. For slurries having high
concentrations, it is possible to have all three forms of ow, namely, laminar,
transition, and turbulent ow depending on the value of Reynolds number.
For laminar ow, the Fanning friction factor expression is obtained by theoretical
analysis. However, for transition as well as for turbulent ow regimes, the evaluation
of friction factor is based on some empirical correlations. The present analysis is based
on the empirical approach of Darby and Melson (1981). Their mathematical approach
is briey described below.
The relationship for the Fanning friction factor, the Hedstorm number (H
e
),
and the Bingham Reynolds number (Re
B
) is given by
1
Re
B
=
]
16
H
e
6Re
2
B
+
H
4
e
3]
3
Re
8
B
(1)
where
H
e
=
D
2
t
,B
j
m
p
2
(2)
and
Re
B
=
DVj
m
p
(3)
It is also possible to express the friction factor in terms of modied Reynolds
number, Re
mod
:
] =
16
Re
mod
(4)
where
Re
mod
=
6Re
2
B
6Re
B
+H
e
(5)
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
Pressure Drop and Rheological Characteristics of Fly Ash Slurry 277
Though the exact formula for the Fanning friction factor is expressed by Equation (1),
the friction factor can also be obtained approximately from Equation (4).
For the transition from laminar to turbulent ow Hanks and Pratt (1967)
proposed the following critical Reynolds number criterion. It occurs at a critical
value of Re
B
given by
(Re
B
)
c
=
H
e
8x
c
1
4
3
x
c
+
1
3
x
4
c
(6)
where x
c
is evaluated from the relation
x
c
(1 x
c
)
3
=
H
e
16800
(7)
In the turbulent ow regime, the expression for ]
T
is based on the empirical
formulae developed by Darby and Melson (1981). The following expression is used
for evaluating the Fanning friction factor in the present study:
]
T
= 10
c
Re
0.193
B
(8)
where
c = 1.378(1 +0.146 exp(2.9 10
5
Re
B
)) (9)
To arrive at a single friction factor expression valid for all ow regimes, the modied
friction factor is evolved by Darby and Melson (1981) as
] =
]
m
L
+]
m
T
1,m
(10)
where
m = 1.7 +40000,Re
B
(11)
On the basis of the above formulation, a simple computer program was
developed for the evaluation of the pressure drop. The program covers the whole
range of uid ow, i.e., laminar, transition, and turbulent regimes of ow. In the
present calculations, the temperature correction has also been incorporated because
the temperature during the rheological measurements and that during pipeline ow
could be different.
Results and Discussion
The plots of experimental data in terms of shear stress (t) and shear rate (), in
the range from 20 to 120s
1
were analyzed for identifying the rheological model.
It is seen that the variation of the shear stress with shear rate at all concentrations
with and without additives for these y ash sample follows a straight-line behavior.
The straight-line equation is expressed in the form (Bingham plastic model):
t = t
,
+p
(12)
where t
,
= Bingham yield stress and p
= Bingham viscosity.
The straight-line equation was tted for each set of data, using the method of
least squares. It was seen that the values of t
,
are nonzero for all sets of data.
This implies that the y ash slurry, for the data presented, shows a non-Newtonian
behavior and can be represented by a Bingham plastic model uid. A typical
rheogram of y ash slurry at 65% concentration is shown in Figure 2.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
278 S. Chandel et al.
Figure 2. Rheogram of y ash slurry at concentration C
n
= 65% (by wt.).
Effect of Solid Concentration on Slurry Rheology
Table 2 shows the variation of the yield shear stress and Bingham plastic viscosity
with concentration, and it is seen that in the range of tests carried out, the values of
both yield shear stress (t
,
) and the relative Bingham plastic viscosity (p
r
= p
,p
n
)
increase exponentially with increase in solid concentration. This can be attributed to
the decrease in the consistency of the slurries, which increases the resistance to shear.
Also, when relatively larger numbers of solid particles are present, a comparatively
larger value of initial shear stress is required to start the process of shearing.
The yield shear stress (t
,
) value at 70% solid concentration is 1.945Pa, whereas at
60% solid concentration it is 0.36Pa. The value of relative Bingham viscosity (p
r
) at
60% solid concentration is 16.27 and 275.3 at 70% solid concentration. This increase
can be explained on the basis of the fact that the number of particles and the
surface area of the solids per unit volume of slurry increases with increase in solid
concentration.
Table 2. Rheological properties of y ash
Yield Slurry viscosity Water viscosity Relative
% C
n
Temp. stress p
( 10
3
) p
n
( 10
3
) slurry
(by wt.) (
C) t
,
(Pa) (Pa-s) (Pa-s) viscosity p
r
Remarks
0 25 0.891 1.0 Newtonian
60 25 0.360 14.50 0.891 16.27 non-Newtonian
65 25 1.36 53.40 0.891 60.00 non-Newtonian
68 25 1.712 172.10 0.891 193.15 non-Newtonian
70 25 1.945 245.30 0.891 275.30 non-Newtonian
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
Pressure Drop and Rheological Characteristics of Fly Ash Slurry 279
Table 3. Rheological properties of y ash with (WA) and without additive (WOA)
Without additive (WOA) With additive (WA)
Top particle % C
n
Temp. (
( 10
3
) Pa-s (t
,
) in Pa p
( 10
3
) Pa-s
0.3mm 60 25/25 0.360 14.50 0.10 7.75
65 25/25 1.360 53.40 0.99 35.90
68 25/25 1.712 172.10 1.04 110.0
70 25/25 1.945 245.30 1.20 150.20
Effect of Additive on Fly Ash Slurry Rheology
Table 3 shows the effect of a mixture of sodium carbonate and Henko detergent
additive in the ratio of 5:1 (0.2% by weight) on the yield stress and Bingham plastic
viscosity at different concentrations. Data shows a marked decrease in viscosity of
the y ash slurry from 14.50 Pas to 7.75 Pas at C
n
= 60%. Similarly, at 70% solid
concentration, p
reduces from 245.30 Pas to 150.2 Pas. Data also show that the
mixture of sodium carbonate and Henko detergent drastically decreases the yield
shear stress of y ash slurry from 0.360 Pa to 0.10 Pa at C
n
= 60%. Similarly, at 70%
solid concentration yield stress reduces from 1.945Pa to 1.20Pa. From the results,
it is observed that mixture of sodium carbonate and Henko detergent as additive
reduces both viscosity and yield stress of y ash slurry signicantly. The reason
behind reduction in viscosity is that in the turbulent ow regime there is a reduction
in interparticle friction, whereas in the laminar ow regime, this effect can be
attributed to the reduction of surface tension and zeta potential of the ne particles
due to the presence of additive.
Figure 3. Pressure drop variation in 40mm NB pipeline for y ash slurry with ow velocity
at different concentrations (% by wt.).
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
280 S. Chandel et al.
Figure 4. Comparison of experimental and predicted values of pressure drop at various ow
velocities and concentrations.
Pressure Drop Characteristics
In the pilot plant test loop, measurement of pressure drop across a stretch 7m
in length for a 40mm NB pipeline at various ow velocities was performed with
water and subsequently for y ash slurries with solid concentrations in the range
of 5070% (by weight); the results are presented in Figure 3. At each concentration
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
Pressure Drop and Rheological Characteristics of Fly Ash Slurry 281
the pressure drop in mWc for a 100m pipeline is calculated from the measurements
over the range of velocities. It is observed that at any given solid concentration
the pressure drop increases with increasing velocity, the rate of increase being more
pronounced at higher velocities. Observations show a large increase in pressure drop
at high concentrations as compared to the pressure drop at low concentrations, and
this is directly related to the non-Newtonian nature of the slurry. The pressure drop
in laminar ow is a strong function of rheological properties, and increase in yield
stress/viscosity increases the pressure drop manifold.
Using the measured values of p
and t
,
, computations have been carried out to
evaluate the pressure drop in a smooth pipeline of 40mm diameter by the Darby
and Melson (1981) approach. A comparison between the experimental data of the
pressure drop for y ash slurry and the predicted data of the pressure drop at
selected ow velocities for different solid concentrations, namely, 60%, 65%, 68%,
and 70% (by weight) is shown in Figures 4(a) and (b). The gure shows that the
experimental data points fall closely to the line of predicted values, which supports
the prediction methodology. For concentrations 68% and 70% (by weight), 95% of
the predicted data points fall within the 10% deviation range. It is seen that the
pressure drop is always under-predicted for both concentrations. For concentrations
65% and 60% (by weight), 95% of the predicted data points fall within the 15%
deviation range, which is reasonably acceptable for design purposes.
Figure 5. Comparison of experimental and predicted values of pressure drop at various ow
velocities and concentrations (with and without additive).
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
282 S. Chandel et al.
Effect of Additive on Pressure Drop
Figure 5 shows the effect of additive on variation of pressure drop with velocity
for y ash slurry at concentrations 60, 65, 68, and 70% by weight. At C
n
> 65%
the effect of additive is more than at C
n
= 60%. This effect is due to the fact that
the additive promotes particle dispersion, hence resulting in reduction of Bingham
viscosity. At C
n
= 70%, overall reduction in pressure drop is 35%.
It has already been shown that additive of soap solution to the y ash slurry
changes its rheological properties considerably. This should substantially affect
the pressure drop in the pipeline. With additive, it is seen that for any given
concentration, at any selected velocity, there is signicant reduction in pressure drop
in comparison to original y ash (see Figure 5). It is found that at any selected
velocity there is substantial decrease in the pressure drop, and quantitatively the
average decrease is around 30%. This highlighted a net saving of approximately
one-third of the total energy consumption.
Concluding Remarks
The main objective of the present work was to study the effect of additive on pressure
drop and rheological characteristics of y ash slurry at higher concentrations, mainly
above 60%(by weight). On the basis of the study conducted, the following conclusions
can be drawn:
1. Slurries of y ash at these concentrations show a Bingham uid behavior.
The Bingham viscosity and yield shear stress values increase with increase in
concentration, the increase being more pronounced at the higher concentrations.
2. Pressure drop increases with increase in concentration, the increase being much
higher at higher concentrations.
3. The addition of soap solution as additive to the y ash slurries reduces
the rheological parameters and can result in substantial saving in energy
consumption.
4. The prediction model proposed by Darby and Melson (1981) is suitable for
Bingham plastic uids ow such as y ash slurry at concentrations above 60%
(by weight).
Nomenclature
C
n
efux concentration (by weight)
D diameter of pipe, m
J particle size, mm
J
nm
weighted mean diameter, mm
] Fanning friction factor
]
L
Fanning friction factor (laminar ow)
]
T
Fanning friction factor (turbulent ow)
g acceleration due to gravity, m/s
2
Ah head loss in meters of water column per 100m length of pipeline,
mWc/m
H
e
Hedstrom number
m constant
P
R
relative pressure drop w.r.t. water, AP
slurry
,AP
water
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
Pressure Drop and Rheological Characteristics of Fly Ash Slurry 283
Q ow rate, m
3
,s
(Re
B
)
C
critical Reynolds number
Re
B
Reynolds number based on Bingham viscosity
V velocity of ow, m/s
V
av
average velocity, m/s
Greek Letters
shear rate, s
1
p
,p
nr
p
nr
viscosity of water, Pa-s
t
,
yield stress, Pa
References
Bantin, R. A. & M. Streat. 1970. Dense-phase ow of solid-water mixtures in pipelines.
In Proceedings of Hydrotransport 1. Craneld, Bedford, U.K.: British Hydromechanics
Research Association. Paper G1, pp. 124.
Biswas, A., B. K. Gandhi, S. N. Singh, & V. Seshdri. 2000. Characteristics of coal ash and
their role in hydraulic design of ash disposal pipelines. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 7: 17.
Bunn, T. F. & A. J. Chambers. 1993. Experiences with dense phase hydraulic conveying of
vales point y ash. Int. J. Powder Handling Process 5 (1): 3544.
Bunn, T. F., A. J. Chambers, & C. H. Goh. 1991. Rheology of some y ash slurries. Powder
Handling Process 3 (3): 221226.
Darby, R. & J. Melson. 1981. How to predict the friction factor for the ow of Bingham
plastics. Chem. Eng. 88 (26): 5961.
Elliot, D. E. 1970. Hydraulic transport of coal ash at high concentration. In Proceedings
of Hydrotransport 1, 2556. Craneld, Bedford, U.K.: British Hydromechanics Research
Association.
Hanks, R. W. & D. R. Pratt. 1967. On the ow of Bingham plastic slurries in pipes and
between parallel plates. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 7: 342346.
Heywood, N. I. 1986. A review of techniques for reducing energy consumption in
slurry pipelines. In Proceedings of Hydrotransport 10. Craneld, Bedford, U.K.: British
Hydromechanics Research Association. Paper K3, pp. 319331.
Horsely, R. R. 1982. Viscometers and pipe loop test on gold slime slurry at very high
concentration (by weight) with and without additive. In Proceedings of Hydrotransport
8, 367381. Craneld, Bedford, U.K.: British Hydromechanics Research Association.
Kolar, V. 1970. Visco-elastic uid solid ow in pipes. In Proceedings of Hydrotransport 1,
225242. Craneld, Bedford, U.K.: British Hydromechanics Research Association.
Kumar, U. 2002. Studies on the ow of non-uniform particulate slurries through straight
pipes and bends. Ph.D. diss., Department of Applied Mechanics, IIT Delhi.
Parida, A., D. Panda, R. N. Mishra, P. K. Senapati, & J. S. Murty. 1996. Hydraulic
transportation of y ash at higher concentration. In Ash Ponds and Ash Disposal Systems.
ed. V. S. Raju, M. Datta, V. Seshadri, V. K. Agrawal, & V. Kumar. pp. 1728.
Seshadri, V., S. N. Singh, V. K. Agrawal, M. Datta, & V. Kumar. 2001. Alternate coal ash
disposal systems for thermal power plants. Project report submitted by Department of
Applied Mechanics, ITT Delhi to Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi, India.
Seshadri, V., S. N. Singh, K. K. Jain, & A. Verma. 2005. Rheology of y ash slurries at high
concentrations and its application to the design of high concentration slurry disposal
system (HCSD). In Fly Ash India 2005. New Delhi: Central Board of Irrigation and
Power.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3
284 S. Chandel et al.
Singh, B. 1989. Continuous mixing and pumping of high density y ash water slurries,
laboratory and pilot plant studies. Paper presented at Seventh Conference of Electrical
Power Supply Industry. Brisbane.
Sive, A. W., & J. H. Lazarus. 1986. A comparison of some generalized correlations for
the head loss gradient of mixed regime slurries. In Proceedings of Hydrotransport 10.
Craneld, Bedford, U.K.: British Hydromechanics Research Association. Paper E2,
pp. 149175.
Verkerk, C. G. 1985. Some practical aspect of correlating empirical equation to experimental
data in slurry pipeline transport. Bulk Solids Handling 5 (4): 2131.
Verma, A. K. 2004. Study on high concentration y ash slurry disposal through pipe line.
Ph. D. diss., Department of Applied Mechanics, IIT Delhi.
Wilson, K. C. 1982. A dense phase option for coarse coal pipelining. J. Pipelines 5: 251257.
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
T
h
a
p
a
r
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
]
a
t
0
4
:
5
8
0
8
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
3