Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared by
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED Project Submitted by: THOUBAL MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, Manipur
INDEX
Sl No
Page No 2 5 8 12 19 27 35 39 40 41 66
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Introduction Town Profile Existing Infrastructure Status Urban Poor Profile Project Description Project Components Funding Pattern Drawings & Estimates BPL List
APPRAISAL OF DPR OF INTEGRATED HOUSING AND SLUM DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (IHSDP) FOR THOUBAL, MANIPUR Name of the State Category of state whether special Category * or general ? (* special category states are J&K, Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh & North Eastern State (including Sikkim) Name of the District Name of ULB a) Whether MoA for reforms has been signed with the Ministry Urban Development? b) Whether a copy of the signed MoA has been received in the Ministry of Urban Employment & Poverty Alleviation or not? c) Whether signed MoA mentions with asterisk that two reforms, viz, i Repeal of Urban Land Ceiling & Regulation Act; and ii Amendment of Rent Control Laws balancing the interest of landlords and tenants are optional with regards to schemes under IHSDP? Whether the State Level Nodal Agency has been designated? Whether the DPR has been forwarded by the designated Agency? Whether the State level Co-ordination Committee (SLCC) has been constituted? Whether DPR has been recommended by the SLCC? Whether elected local body is in place? Total Urban population of the city Total Urban Poor population of the city Is DPR an integrated housing & infrastructure project? (if no proper justification) Manipur Special Category State
Yes
Has the contribution from the beneficiaries No been collected Has the state share been deposited in a State share earmarked, GOI approval separate account? awaited.
Is the DPR for in Situ development? Is the DPR for relocation? In case of relocation, whether all basic amenities have been provided for in the new site in the DPR? Is the new site in proximity to the original site/work place? In case of in Situ, whether provision for basic services has been provided for in the DPR 1. Whether density of population norms has been observation in the DPR with reference to city as per the bylaws? 2. Whether plotted area setbacks and coverage of plot area as per bylaws? 3. Whether maximum FAR utilization has been considered in the DPR to ensure efficient use of land? 4. Whether the dwelling unit cost is within the ceiling limit? 5. In case the cost is higher, whether the source of funds has been tide up/indicated? 6. Whether security of tenure/Patta has been provided to the beneficiaries, as per guidelines, preferably women? 7. Whether the floor area of dwelling unit is equal or more than 25sq.m/Built-up area. 8. Whether each dwelling unit comprises two rooms, kitchen and a toilet? Infrastructure facilities Whether provisioning for following has been made in the DPR: 1. Water supply 2. Sewerage 3. Solid waste disposal 4. Development of roads/paths/ footpaths/pavements 5. Storm water drains 6. Street lighting Whether environmental impact consideration has been made into account while preparing the DPR?
Yes No NA
NA Yes Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Identified beneficiaries shall be women and co-pattadar (husband and wife) only. Yes, 34.16 Sqm Each dwelling unit comprises of two rooms, kitchen and a veranda. No attach toilet due to non acceptability of public. Scheme approved under UIDSSMT, release of CS awaited, however improvement of public pond to preserve the water is proposed. No sewerage system. Individual septic tanks commonly used hence proposed. Project under implementation funded from ten percent earmark fund for NE Region. Being taken care from the State Plan. Natural drainage system effectively in use. Existing facility considered adequate. Yes
Community facilities Whether provisioning for the following has been made in the DPR 1. Community Centre 2. Community Primary Health Care Centre 3. Primary Education Centre 4. Parks and open space Whether cost of land has been included in the project cost where private land has been acquired? (Application only to Special category State, viz, J&K, Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh, and North Eastern States including Sikkim.) Whether a separate provision for up keep and maintenance of public assets to be created through this project has been made by the state government/ULB/Parasitical? Whether DPR is a PPP Projects? Is the DPR in accordance with the IHSDP guidelines? If not indicate deviations and provide justification. Any other information relevant to the DPR
Yes Existing facility considered adequate. Existing facility considered adequate. Existing facility considered adequate. NA
No Yes
Signature of the competent Authority in ULB Name : A. Manjuri Devi Designation : Chairperson, Thoubal Municipal Council Off. Address : Thoubal, Pin 795138 Tel. No/Fax No. : 03848222270
Signature of the competent Authority in ULB Name: Ak. Biren Singh Designation : Vice-Chairperson, Thoubal Municipal Council Off. Address : Thoubal, Pin 795138 Tel. No/Fax No. : 03848222270
Verified and countersigned by the State Level Nodal Agency Name : N. Gitkumar Singh Designation : Chief Town Planner Town Planning Department, Manipur Off. Address : Town Planning Department, Directorate Building, North AOC, Imphal, 795001 Tel. No/Fax No. : 03852423256
Technical check list of IHSDP for Thoubal, Manipur. Name of the State Name of City i. Nodal Agency ii. Implementing Agency Project cost (Rs. in lacs) State share (Rs. In lacs) 1. Beneficiary Contribution 2. Agencys own funds 3. Loan from HFL/Banks 4. States grant 5. MP/MLA/LAD funds 6. Any other Central share (Rs. in lacs) i. Project duration ii. Date of Commencement/Completion Name of the Bank/account No. where State share is deposited Date & amount of deposit (Rs. in lacs) i. No. of DUs ii. Cost of housing (Rs. in lacs) iii. Floor area of a DU/Built-up area iv. Whether there is provision of kitchen in the DU? v. Whether there is provision of toilet in the DU? i. Density (DU/hectare) ii. Whether proposed density adheres to the Master Plan of the area i. The land use of the proposed site as per the Master Plan ii. If not residential, than necessary approvals for change of land use have been taken? Coverage Area i. Built-up area of house ii. Roads/Pavements iii. Open Spaces/Garden iv. Community facilities v. Education & Health Manipur Thoubal i. Town Planning Department, Manipur. ii. Thoubal Municipal Council. Rs 1,201.82 lakhs Rs 157.09 lakhs Rs 145.98 lakhs
Rs 898.75 lakhs i. 15 months 815 nos Rs 1.07 lakh per Unit 31.16 sqm Yes No. Detached toilet proposed. Yes Yes -
34.16 sqm NA NA NA
Whether Statutory approvals from various local bodies have been taken such as: i. TCP ii. Municipality iii. Fire Department iv. Pollution Control Board v. Ministry of Environment etc. Whether fire safety measures have been adopted Whether Building Plans, Layout Plans, Master Plan are enclosed or not Schedule of rates adopted Provision of infrastructure facilities Community toilets 1. Expenditure involved 2. No. of WCs/Baths proposed Water Supply 1. Expenditure involved 2. whether municipal water supply available in vicinity? If no, type of water supply system proposed? 3. whether there is provision for rain water harvesting? Sewerage 1. Expenditure involved 2. Whether municipal sewer line available in vicinity? If no, type of sewerage system proposed? Roads/Pavements 1. Expenditure involved 2. Whether connectivity with the main peripheral road exists or not? If not, is it proposed in the DPR.
NA
NA Storm Water Drainage & side drains Yes 1. Expenditure involved 2. Whether connectivity with the primary / secondary drains exists or not? If not, is it proposed in the DPR. Parks and Open Spaces 1. Expenditure involved Electrification 1. Expenditure involved 2. Whether street lighting of internal roads / pavements proposed? NA NA
Solid Waste Disposal 1. Expenditure involved 2. Distance from landfill 3. Whether there is provision for waste recycling and segregation? Other Services to be converged with other Central/State programme. A. Health Care Facilities 1. Whether proposed within the site 2. if not, does it exist in the vicinity 3. if not, is it proposed in the vicinity 4. if in the vicinity, distance from the site 5. Expenditure involved 6. Methodology adopted for convergence B. Educational Facilities 1. Whether proposed within the site 2. if not, does it exist in the vicinity 3. if not, is it proposed in the vicinity 4. if in the vicinity, distance from the site 5. Expenditure involved 6. Methodology adopted for convergence C. Social Security 1. Details of social security provisions available like medical insurance, pension schemes etc. 2. Expenditure involved, item wise 3. Methodology adopted for convergence D. Provision of other civic amenities (if any) Details of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) done Methodology adopted for maintenance of assets thus created Mechanism for sustainable management for services Use of Innovative and cost effective materials and technology. Details thereof Use of earthquake resistance technology. Details thereof
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA No Yes Yes
Signature of State Level Nodal Officer (N. Gitkumar Singh) Chief Town Planner, Manipur
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background:
Out of 27 towns eligible to be covered under Integrated Housing & Slum Development Programme (IHSDP), Manipur Government has decided to take up Thoubal town in Thoubal district and Jiribam town in Imphal (East) district during the year 2007-08. Thoubal town was considered taking into account its population as per 2001 Census and Jiribam town was considered due to the remoteness of its location and distance from the Capital city of Imphal. While prioritising these towns, the existing infrastructure, economically and socially disadvantaged section of the populace were taken into consideration. This Project Report is for IHSDP of Thoubal town.
Imphal
THOUBAL
Kakching
Moreh
The present extent of Thoubal Municipal Council area is 11.05 SqKm. As per 2001 Census, the total population of Thoubal town is 41,174.
1.3 Objective:
The basic objective of IHSDP Scheme is to strive for holistic slum development with a healthy and enabling urban environment by providing adequate shelter and basic infrastructure facilities to the slum dwellers of the identified urban areas. There are no notified slums in Manipur as per 2001 Census. But slum-like situation prevails. According to NSSO, undeclared slums were defined as if 20
households live in a compact area with a collection of poorly built tenements, mostly of temporary nature, crowded together usually with inadequate sanitary and drinking water facilities in unhygienic condition. In the case of towns in Manipur, no compact area with 20 or more households fulfilling the conditions of NSSO exists. Rather, poorly built tenements with inadequate facilities are there in scattered plots owned by individuals. Hence, the objective of this Project Report is to: