Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Objectives Flow Chart of the Flexible Multi-Body Dynamic Modal Stress Synthesis for Dynamic Durability Analysis
Objectives
Dynamic stress simulation to account Effective structural design for durability
for inertia effect (dynamic equilibrium & satisfy both the geometric (critical for component with large deformation or rigid body motion articulation) and force boundary conditions .
Inertia Relief based fatigue analysis (may mislead design) Examples: compound crank rear axle & suspension links FEA-based modal or direct transient fatigue analysis (not practical) Practical and efficient approach for
optimization.
Standard quasi-static design loads Road load based duty cycle loads
dynamic fatigue analysis & synthesis. No additional simulation effort is required compared with traditional dynamic load prediction (incorporating flexible body into multi-body dynamic model)
MSC Software Confidential
3
Flexible Multi-Body Dynamic Modal Stress Synthesis for Chassis Durability Application Examples
Theory: Craig-Bampton Component Mode Synthesis (CMS) It combines the motion of joint interfaces with normal modes of the structural components
Methodologies Verification
Torsional Beam Fatigue Damage Correlation
Good Correlation: The peak damage ratio between the two methods is 1: 1.6
Spindle Lateral Load (Modal Stress Synthesis) (correlate test failure mode)
Baseline Road Loads Structural Damage (i) Wheel Forces & Suspension Interface Pseudo-Fatigue Damage (ii) Structural Fatigue Damage Using ADAMS/Flex Modal Frequency Method
10
Application: Multi-Axial Subsystem Block Cycle Accelerated Test Development (Cont.) Damage Correlation of Rig Test Interface Loads
11
Conclusions
The flexible multi-body dynamic modal stress based durability analysis and synthesis is a key enabler for vehicle durability development process in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. The amount of extra computation time and effort is low and yet the accuracy of life prediction is greatly enhanced compared to traditional methods.
Multi-axial subsystem block cycle accelerated test using this methodology can significantly reduce test time (compared with RPC test) and still retain the damage content in the critical locations.
Contributors
13