10 Waste Water

Chapter 10 - Hastings 2030 Comprehensive Plan
COMPREHENSIVE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PLAN
Prepared for: City of Hastings 101 4th Street East Hastings, MN 55033
November 4, 2008
Prepared by: WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 763-541-4800 (Tel) 763-541-1700 (Fax)
Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan City of Hastings, MN WSB Project No. 1784-00
Infrastructure Engineering Planning Construction
701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700
November 4, 2008
Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Hastings 101 4th Street East Hastings, MN 55033 Re: Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan City of Hastings, MN WSB Project No. 1784-00
Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Transmitted herewith is the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan for the abovereferenced project. The report is a planning tool to help the City meet its short-term and longterm sanitary sewer needs. We would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please give us a call at 763-541-4800 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc.
Joseph C. Ward, PE Project Engineer Enclosure lh/srb
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Joseph C. Ward, PE Date: November 4, 2008 Lic. No. 45855
Quality Control Review by:
Kevin F. Newman, PE Date: November 4, 2008 Lic. No. 25198
Quality Control Review by:
David E. Hutton, PE Date: November 4, 2008 Lic. No. 19133
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE SHEET LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 2.0 3.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ........................................................................................................5 LAND USE...............................................................................................................................6 3.1 3.2 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 Land Use Categorization...............................................................................................6 Developable Areas ........................................................................................................6 Projected Residential Growth .......................................................................................8 Projected Non-Residential Growth ...............................................................................8 Projected Land Use Phasing and Summary ..................................................................9 Existing Service Areas................................................................................................10 Existing Wastewater Flows.........................................................................................10 5.2.1 Existing Sewer District Wastewater Flows ....................................................10 5.2.2 Estimated Unit Wastewater Flows .................................................................12 Infiltration/Inflow .......................................................................................................14 5.3.1 General ...........................................................................................................14 5.3.2 I/I Analysis .....................................................................................................15 5.3.3 Municipal I/I Reduction .................................................................................16 Evaluation of Existing Facilities .................................................................................16 5.4.1 Wastewater Treatment....................................................................................17 5.4.2 Lift Stations ....................................................................................................17 5.4.3 Trunk Mains ...................................................................................................18 5.4.4 Summary of Existing System Evaluation.......................................................19 Future Service Areas...................................................................................................20 Future Wastewater Flows ...........................................................................................22 6.2.1 Estimated Unit Wastewater Flows .................................................................22 6.2.2 Future Sewer District Flows...........................................................................25 Future Trunk Sanitary Sewer System .........................................................................26 6.3.1 North District..................................................................................................26 6.3.2 South Central District .....................................................................................27 6.3.3 Northwest District and Expansion..................................................................27 6.3.4 West Central District and Expansion .............................................................28 6.3.5 Southwest District and Expansion..................................................................30 6.3.6 South District and Expansion .........................................................................31 6.3.7 Southeast District and Expansion...................................................................32 6.3.8 Northeast District............................................................................................33 6.3.9 East-Southeast District ...................................................................................34 6.3.10 East District ....................................................................................................35
GROWTH PROJECTIONS...................................................................................................8
5.3
5.4
6.0
FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM..........................................................................20 6.1 6.2
6.3
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
7.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (CIP) ......................................................................36 7.1 Estimated Cost of Trunk System Improvements ........................................................36 Capital Improvement Plan Summary Gross Developable Acreage City of Hastings Metropolitan Council System Statement Potential Service Area M602 Historical Wastewater Flow 2006 and 2007 Lift Station Wastewater Pumped Uncalibrated Estimated Wastewater Flow Generation Rates SewerCAD Model Wastewater Flow Calibration Calibrated Estimated Wastewater Flow Generation Rates Existing Peak Flow Factors Existing Sewer District Estimated Average Wastewater Flow Existing Lift Station Capacities and Flows Existing System Peak Flows Summary of 2030 Gross Developable Acres by Sewer District Future Wastewater Flows by Sewer District Through 2030 Future Wastewater Flows by Sewer District 2010 to 2015 Capital Improvement Plan Summary
Tables Table 1-1 Table 3-1 Table 4-1 Table 4-2 Table 5-1 Table 5-2 Table 5-3 Table 5-4 Table 5-5 Table 5-6 Table 5-7 Table 5-8 Table 5-9 Table 6-1 Table 6-2 Table 6-3 Table 7-1 Figures Figure 3-1 Figure 3-2 Figure 4-1 Figure 4-2 Figure 5-1 Figure 5-2 Figure 6-1 Figure 6-2 Figure 6-3 Figure 7-1
Ultimate Land Use Plan Gross Developable Acreages City of Hastings Population Projections Potential Ultimate Service Area Existing Sanitary Sewer System Existing ISTS Future Sewer Sheds 2030 Trunk Sewer System Layout and Sizes Ultimate Trunk Sewer System Layout and Sizes Trunk Sewer System Construction Phasing
Appendix 1 MCES Peaking Factors Appendix 2 Development Phase Cost Estimates
1.0
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Hastings Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan (study) is intended to provide an inventory of the Citys existing sanitary sewer facilities (trunk sewer system), an analysis of the adequacy of existing facilities, a plan to expand the existing trunk sewer system to collect wastewater flow from future development, and a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for funding future trunk sewer system expansions. The trunk sewer system is defined as gravity sewer mains greater than 10-inches in diameter, lift stations with upstream gravity sewer mains greater than 10-inches in diameter, and force mains associated with trunk lift stations. The report, analysis, and figures relative to the existing trunk sewer system were based on data (as-builts, development extents, and wastewater flow data) as of December 31, 2007. Recommended future trunk sewer system improvements were based on data (wastewater flow projections and development extents) from the land use plan included in the January 8, 2008 draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan (draft comprehensive plan) and planning discussions with City staff. Future development plans or the existing trunk sewer system may have changed since the snapshot in time the report was based on. It is recommended to update the SewerCAD model completed with this study as development occurs in order to maintain an accurate existing system SewerCAD model. The existing area to which the City provides sanitary sewer service has been divided into eight (8) sewer districts. The existing sewer districts are mostly developed and the existing land uses are shown in Figure 3-1. Wastewater is collected by the Citys trunk sewer system, and then conveyed to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Hastings Wastewater Treatment Plant (treatment plant). MCES plans to relocate the existing treatment plant to provide additional capacity as the City grows. The existing sanitary sewer system and districts are shown in Figure 5-1. Capacity analysis for the existing trunk sewer system was completed by creating a model of the existing trunk sewer system using SewerCAD software (SewerCAD V5.6) and as-builts provided by the City. The location of existing generated wastewater flows and where the wastewater enters the trunk sewer system was estimated in order to analyze the capacity of the existing trunk sewer system. Wastewater flows generated per unit were estimated based on typical MCES recommendations, and then calibrated by coordinating estimated wastewater flows with the existing land use and existing MCES wastewater flow data. Results from the modeling indicate the existing trunk sewer system has adequate capacity for conveying existing peak flows as shown in Figure 5-3. City staff confirmed there are no existing trunk sewer system bottlenecks where overflows have occurred or peak wastewater flows exceeded the capacity of lift station pumps. Future wastewater flows will increase as population growth and development occur. Growth projections included in the draft comprehensive plan have been developed accordance with the Metropolitan Council System Statement. The future land use plan, shown in Figure 3-2, provides sufficient development area to meet the Citys growth needs in accordance with the Metropolitan Council Regional Development Framework. Growth projections included in the
Page 1
draft comprehensive plan indicate not all of the land shown in Figure 3-2 will be developed by 2030. Planning for expansion of the trunk sewer system is typically based on developable acres because the location of development is critical for determining the capacity of individual downstream sewers. For that reason, the extents of the future land use plan area have been termed the 2030 sewer service area. Growth rates will continually change with time; however, the capacity of the trunk sewer system is based on the development of specific areas at specific locations. Planning for the trunk sewer system beyond the 2030 boundary was important to identify potential trunk sewer corridors and preserve the corridors as development occurs. Analysis of the topography surrounding Hastings indicated existing gravity sewers could be extended beyond the 2030 sewer service area. Therefore, the extents of the ultimate sewer service area were not defined based on topography, but by existing trunk sewer system capacity limitations and the ultimate wastewater treatment plant capacity. Ultimate sewer districts are shown in Figure 6-1. Some trunk sewers could be difficult to reconstruct or add capacity; therefore, the boundaries of ultimate sewer districts were influenced by the capacity limitations of individual trunk sewer sections. It is anticipated that development will initially occur within the 2030 sewer service area and the existing trunk sewer system could be extended to serve new development. However, once wastewater flow increases to 5.6 million gallons per day (MGD) peak flow in the main interceptor, it is recommended to increase the capacity of the main interceptor. Main interceptor capacity could be added by construction of a parallel interceptor, increasing the size of the existing interceptor, or a combination of both, as shown in Figures 6-2 and 6-3. It was assumed the parallel interceptor would be constructed at the same grade as the existing interceptor sewer. The development trigger line is shown in Figure 6-3, and includes most development prior to 2020 as shown in Figure 4-2. A detailed evaluation is recommended to determine the most cost effective construction method for adding interceptor capacity and project phasing as wastewater flows increase to the trigger point. Construction of the parallel main interceptor, or increase of main interceptor capacity, should be coordinated with MCESs planned relocation of the treatment plant because as wastewater flows increase to the capacity of the existing main interceptor, wastewater flow will also approach the existing treatment plant capacity. Therefore, it is recommended that construction of the parallel main interceptor would include additional improvements to route wastewater flow to the future treatment plant location. Additional improvements necessary to route flows to the future treatment plant would include construction of a 1,000 gallon per minute (GPM) lift station at the existing treatment plant to pump wastewater to the main interceptor. The main interceptor could be extended to the future treatment plant as a 36 to 42-inch interceptor along Ravena Road as shown in Figures 6-2 and 6-3. Both the treatment plant relocation and parallel interceptor construction would be completed by 2020 if development occurs in accordance with the projections shown in Figure 4-2. After construction of the parallel interceptor and relocation of the treatment plant, development growth would likely continue to the 2030 sewer service area boundary in all districts in accordance with the future land use plan (Figure 3-2) and land use phasing plan (Figure 4-2).
Page 2
However, once growth has encompassed the 2030 sewer service area, expansion of the trunk sewer system could be limited to the west central, east, and east-southeast districts until an east interceptor could be constructed to collect future wastewater flows from development beyond the 2030 sewer service area in the southeast, south, and southwest districts. Future wastewater flows generated by the 2030 sewer service area plus the ultimate west central district would equal approximately 75% of the ultimate main interceptor capacity (ultimate includes parallel interceptor construction), or 5.0 MGD average flow and 12 MGD peak flow. After the capacity of the ultimate main interceptor is reached (75% of total capacity), expansion of the ultimate trunk sewer system could be limited to an east interceptor. An east interceptor could be extended south through the east-southeast district along Nicolai Avenue to MN 316 and continue west as development occurs to collect ultimate wastewater flows from the southeast, south, and southwest districts. The ultimate sewer districts were sized not to exceed 10.0 MGD average flow since that is the planned ultimate treatment plant capacity. Initial development in the east and east-southeast districts will likely generate minimal flow relative to the capacity of the ultimate 42-inch east interceptor. The ultimate trunk sewer would likely be difficult to maintain when conveying minimum initial wastewater flows. Therefore, it is recommended to preserve the corridor for ultimate trunk sewer construction, but initially a smaller diameter may be constructed. As development pressures increase in this district a more detailed evaluation can be completed to determine phasing of the east interceptor. Topography of the undeveloped areas was studied to determine the route of gravity sewer areas for future trunk facilities. The intention with laying out the future system was to minimize the number of trunk lift stations, while keeping the maximum depth of gravity sewers to less than 40 feet deep. Future sewers were designed at minimum grade as a conservative measure in the event that some sections would be constructed at minimum grade. The Citys topography generally slopes from southwest to northeast, making it possible to avoid constructing many lift stations. The layout of the ultimate trunk sewer system is shown in Figure 6-3. The 2030 trunk sewer system is shown in Figure 6-2, and would be a phase of the ultimate trunk sewer system. The layout is general in nature and exact routing will be determined at the time of final design. It is important that the general concept and sizing be adhered to for assurance of an economical and adequate ultimate system. City staff provided projections of which properties are likely to develop and when based on current development pressure through 2030 as shown in Figure 4-2. Phasing for expansion of the 2030 trunk sewer system was developed in accordance with development phasing as shown in Figure 7-1. Also, the projected phasing shown in Figure 7-1 was used to project future construction costs in the CIP summarized in Table 1-1 below. Construction cost estimates were developed for the completion of the 2030 trunk sewer system. Typically, developers are required to construct sewers and lift stations necessary to serve their development at their own cost. Some gravity trunk sewers included in the ultimate system for this plan were as small as 8 inches in diameter, which is the minimum sewer size construction standards allow. It was assumed that developers would fund and construct all 8-inch sewers, so the estimated quantity of trunk sewers 8 inches in diameter has been included, but not the cost.
Page 3
Table 1-1 below shows the CIP summary. Future improvement costs were based on 2007 construction prices, including a 20% construction contingency, and including 20% overhead (i.e., legal, engineering, and administrative). Street and easement costs and other miscellaneous costs that may be related to final construction are not included. Detailed cost estimates for each five year period of the CIP are located in Appendix 2. Table 1-1 Capital Improvement Plan Summary
District 2010-2015 2015-2020 2020-2025 2025-2030 Total Total $2,920,000 $7,604,000 $1,138,000 $2,250,000 $13,912,000
1. Costs are for budgeting purposes only and are subject to change as projects are studied, designed, and constructed. 2. Costs are estimated based on 2007 construction costs. 3. Land acquisition costs are not included.
Page 4
2.0
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The City of Hastings is located in northeastern Dakota County in the southeast suburbs of the Twin Cities Metropolitan area. Hastings has experienced considerable growth in recent years and anticipates similar growth to continue. It continually experiences development pressures due to its location relative to transportation arterials (MN 55 and US 61) and its proximity to the Twin Cities. The purpose of this study is to update the Citys existing Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan in accordance with Minnesota Statute 473.513. The study provides an inventory of existing sanitary sewer facilities, an analysis of the adequacy of the existing trunk sewer system, a plan to expand the existing trunk sewer system to collect wastewater flow from future development, and a CIP for funding future trunk sewer system expansions. The trunk sewer system is defined as gravity sewer mains greater than 10-inches in diameter, lift stations with upstream gravity sewer mains greater than 10-inches in diameter, and force mains associated with trunk lift stations. The study provides flow projections for the City of Hastings through the year 2030, and has been developed in accordance with the draft Comprehensive Plan and the 2030 Regional Development Framework adopted by the Metropolitan Council. The 2030 Regional Development Framework includes forecasts of population, households, employment, and wastewater flows for communities within the Metropolitan Sewer District. Capacity analysis for the existing trunk sewer system was completed by creating a model of the existing trunk sewer system using SewerCAD software (SewerCAD V5.6) and as-builts provided by the City. Future trunk sewer system improvements were determined by modeling the expansion of the existing trunk sewer system to serve future development based on data (wastewater flow projections and development extents) from the land use plan included in the draft Comprehensive Plan and planning discussions with City staff.
Page 5
3.0
LAND USE
3.1 Land Use Categorization
Figure 3-1 shows existing land use for the City of Hastings as included in the January 8, 2008 draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Existing land use is separated into fifteen (15) different land use categories. Figure 3-2 shows the Citys 2030 land use plan as included in the draft Comprehensive Plan. The 2030 land use plan includes fourteen (14) land use categories, not all of which are consistent with existing land use. Land use is a critical factor in determining existing trunk sewer system capacity and sizing future trunk sewer extensions because different land uses generate different wastewater flow rates. Further detail regarding wastewater flows generated by land use categories is discussed in sections 5 and 6.
3.2
Developable Areas
As discussed in the draft Comprehensive Plan, the future land use plan provides sufficient development area to meet the Citys growth needs in accordance with the Metropolitan Council Regional Development Framework. Growth projections included in the draft Comprehensive Plan indicate not all of the land shown in Figure 3-2 will be developed by 2030. Planning for sewer service is typically based on developed acres because the location of development is critical for determining the capacity of individual downstream sewers. For that reason, the extents of the future land use plan area have been termed the 2030 sewer service area. Growth rates will continually change with time; however, the capacity of the trunk sewer system is based on the development of specific areas at specific locations. The area within the Citys 2030 sewer service area is approximately 12.8 square miles or 8,190 acres as shown in Figure 3-3. The existing sewer service area, approximately 5,290 acres, is defined as developed property with sewer service, or partially developed property to which sewer service has been extended. The existing sewer service area is shown in Figure 3-3. Developable area is defined as the difference between the 2030 sewer service area and the existing sewer service area, less any undevelopable land uses within that area. Land uses considered undevelopable were right of way, conservation, golf course, and park. The difference between the 2030 sewer service area and the existing sewer service area is approximately 2,900 acres, and there are approximately 125 acres of undevelopable land use within that area. Therefore, there are approximately 2,775 acres of developable area.
Page 6
The developable land use area was identified as Gross Developable Acreage because it includes roads and common or public areas potentially included in developments. Roads, common areas, and parks typically consume 25% to 30% of the gross area within a development. The Gross Developable Acreage by land use categories is summarized in Table 3-1. Table 3-1 Gross Developable Acreage1
Land Use Low Density Medium and High Density Housing Business Park Future Neighborhood Industrial Institutional Mixed Commercial and High Density Residential Total
1
Acres 16 46 170 2,284 126 10 123 2,775
Gross developable acreage is based on the land area shown in Figure 3-3 which corresponds to the existing and future land use Figures 3-1 and 3-2. Gross developable acreage shown in Table 3-1 does not directly correlate to growth projections included in the January 8, 2008, draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
Page 7
4.0
GROWTH PROJECTIONS
4.1 Projected Residential Growth
Historical population data for the study area from the Minnesota State Demographers office and future population data from the Metropolitan Council System Statement are shown in Figure 4-1 and Table 4-1. Hastings exhibited consistent growth prior to 1950, but the population has nearly tripled since 1950. The draft Comprehensive Plan projects residential growth based on the Metropolitan Council System Statement. Table 4-1 below shows the future residential population and employment projections provided by the Metropolitan Council included in the Citys System Statement. Table 4-1 City of Hastings Metropolitan Council System Statement
1990 Population Households Employment 15,478 5,403 6,982 2000 18,204 6,642 8,317 Revised Development Framework 2010 23,000 8,800 8,800 2020 27,500 11,000 9,500 2030 30,000 12,500 10,300
Typically, City sewer service is provided to customers who receive City water service. The 2006 State Public Water Supply Inventory estimated the population of Hastings at 22,652 with approximately 6,907 residential water connections (Single Family and Multiple Family). This represents approximately 3.3 people per connection. Should this trend continue, the number of residential connections would increase to 9,090 by 2030 based on the Citys System Statement.
4.2
Projected Non-Residential Growth
Hastings is home to a variety of businesses including a thriving downtown area with many small businesses, county and local government, and several large companies. As shown in Table 4-1, Hastingss employment base is expected to grow steadily over the next thirty years. The 2006 State Public Water Supply Inventory indicated there were 488 non-residential connections (Industrial, Commercial, and Government). Based on the 2006 nonresidential connections and 2006 estimated population, there were approximately 46 people for each non-residential connection. Should this trend continue, the number of non-residential connections would increase to 645 by 2030 based on the Citys System Statement.
Page 8
4.3
Projected Land Use Phasing and Summary
As discussed in the previous section, growth projections have been included in the Citys draft Comprehensive Plan that do not correspond directly to the 2030 sewer service area. However, for sewer planning purposes it is critical to project which areas will develop within a particular time frame. The City of Hastings planning department provided projections of which areas are likely to develop and when. The potential service areas at each interval are shown in Figure 4-2 and summarized in Table 4-2. The potential service area is shown for the years 2007 (existing), 2010, 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030. The existing sewer service area shown in Figure 4-2 is approximately 5,290 acres. The greatest development pressure is expected to occur in the northwest, west, southwestern, and southeastern areas of the City. No growth in the service area was projected prior to 2010. As discussed in the draft Comprehensive Plan, the City currently has a four year supply of approved residential units that are not yet constructed or occupied.
Table 4-2 Potential Service Area

2010 (ac) Total Service Area 5,290 2015 (ac) 5,737 2020 (ac) 6,475 2025 (ac) 6,835 2030 (ac) 8,190
Page 9
5.0
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM

5.1 Existing Service Areas
Sanitary sewer systems consist of two elements: collection and treatment. The existing City sanitary sewer system is a collection system only; Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) is responsible for treatment. The MCES Hastings Wastewater Treatment Plant is located along the Mississippi River in downtown Hastings. Due to the site limitations of the existing wastewater treatment plant, MCES is planning to relocate the treatment plant southeast of downtown. The existing sewer service area is defined as the area from which wastewater flows are collected, and is approximately 5,290 acres. It was broken down into sewer districts based on its connection points to existing City trunk sewers and lift station service areas. Figure 5-1 shows the existing sewer service area, sewer districts (and sub-districts), sanitary sewer system, and lift stations. There are 4 remaining properties within the City sewer service area without sewer service. The remaining unserved properties are generally located near the intersection of Red Wing Boulevard and Vermillion Street and the intersection of 8th Street East and Bailey Street. Wastewater treatment at the remaining unserved properties is accomplished by Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTSs). Figure 5-2 shows the existing ISTSs within the existing City service area.
5.2
Existing Wastewater Flows
An analysis of existing wastewater flows was completed in order to create a SewerCAD model of the existing trunk sewer system. To create an accurate representation of the existing trunk sewer system, the location of where existing wastewater was generated and where it enters the trunk sewer system was estimated. The following sections discuss the method and data used in estimating the location of existing wastewater flows within the existing trunk sewer system. 5.2.1 Existing Sewer District Wastewater Flows The existing wastewater flow rates for sewer districts and sub-districts in the City were estimated by determining existing wastewater flows pumped by each lift station and total wastewater flow received at the treatment plant (MCES flow meter M602). Flow meter data for the treatment plant was received from MCES and is shown in Table 5-1.
Page 10
Table 5-1 M602 Historical Wastewater Flow

Avg. Day Flow (MGD) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Avg. 1.617 1.607 1.591 1.572 1.556 1.589 Peak Flow (MGD) 3.850 3.353 4.631 3.663 4.254 3.950 Peaking Factor 2.38 2.09 2.91 2.33 2.73 2.488
Wastewater flows pumped by each lift station were estimated by multiplying lift station run times by the design flow rate of the lift station pumps. City staff confirmed lift station pumps are well maintained and pumping rates are likely consistent with the design flow rate. Furthermore, lift station data was reviewed for both 2006 and 2007 to confirm lift station pumping data was consistent. Table 5-2 below shows the capacity of each lift station, which is the capacity of all pumps assuming the largest out of service, and the estimated wastewater pumped. The wastewater pumped by each lift station is an estimation of the average daily wastewater flow being generated within the lift stations service area. Table 5-2 2006 and 2007 Lift Station Wastewater Pumped
Lift Station E 10th St. Glendale Hts. HWY 55 Riverdale Tuttle Westwood General Sieben Dr. East Hastings
Pumping Capacity (GPM) 250 320 1,200 300 530 300 120 80
2007 Average Day Flow (GPM) 32 4 147 6 34 17 0 6
2006 Average Day Flow (GPM) 32 2 148 6 34 17 0 9
Page 11
5.2.2 Estimated Unit Wastewater Flows In order to provide a detailed trunk sewer system model, wastewater flows were estimated within each of the 8 sewer districts and their sub-districts. Therefore, unit wastewater flows for each land use type were estimated to determine the total flow generated in each sub-district. Estimated wastewater flows were calibrated with the existing system information. MCES typically estimates 274 gpd/connection or 100 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) for residential development and estimates 800-1500 gallons per acre per day (gpad) for non-residential development depending on the land use. Initial assumptions regarding residential densities were made by WSB, then the existing City land use plan was coordinated with the MCES planning guidelines to develop the uncalibrated estimated flow generation rates shown in Table 5-3. Table 5-3 Uncalibrated Estimated Wastewater Flow Generation Rates
Land Use Category Farmstead Single Family Housing Single Family Attached Multifamily Housing Manufactured Housing Park Office Retail and Commercial Industrial and Utility Institutional Park, Recreational or Preserve Golf Course Railway Agricultural Undeveloped Water Units/Acre Per/Unit Flow/Per (gpcd) 100 100 100 100 Flow/Acre (gpad) 0 900 1,350 1,800 1,800 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,000 100 100 0 0 0 0
3 4.5 6 6
3 3 3 3
Estimated wastewater flow generation rates were multiplied by the total number of acres of each land use category for comparison to existing known wastewater flows. The combination of estimated flow generation rates and the existing land use areas produced higher flows (3.49 MGD) than what was represented by the treatment plant flow meter data and individual lift station run time data. An important data calibration factor is winter water consumption. Winter water demand is typically assumed to be the base annual wastewater flow that excludes lawn watering.
Page 12
The assumed wastewater flow generation rates for each land use type were adjusted so the wastewater generated by all land uses corresponded to approximately 5% higher than existing treatment plant flow data. Wastewater flow generated per land use type was increased slightly higher than existing lift station data and flow meter data in order to be conservative and allow for existing developed areas that may not be generating wastewater flow. For example, some residential units within the existing land use acres may not be occupied, or not completely developed, therefore not generating wastewater flow. The Table 5-4 below shows the calibration factors considered. Table 5-4 SewerCAD Model Wastewater Flow Calibration
Initial Estimated Flow (GPD)1 60,718 13,197 516,050 28,630 98,995 79,243 114 3,485,369 Actual Flow Generated (GPD)2 46,089 4,682 212,055 8,211 48,789 24,633 0 1,588,714 1,820,000 Winter Water Demand Avg. (GPD)3 Final Estimated Flow (GPD)4 18,706 6,590 255,642 14,315 49,226 39,344 57 1,662,527
LS Service Area E 10th St. (NE-2)5 Glendale Hts. (SE-3) HWY 55 (NW) Riverdale (NW-1) Tuttle (SE-1) Westwood (S-1) General Sieben Drive (WC-8) Total Area
1 2
Multiplied existing land use in each sub-district by initial estimated flow rates generated/acre Utilized lift station run time data and MCES flow meter data (Tables 5-1 and 5-2) 3 From comprehensive water plan initial findings 4 Reduced flow rates to match existing data as closely as possible while remaining conservative 5 10th Street lift station actual flow data included in model, not estimated
As shown in Table 5-4, applying estimated unit wastewater flow rates for each area of land use within the existing sewer service resulted in an estimated wastewater flow generated that is higher than actual with the exception of the East 10th Street lift station. This lift station provides service to only the Veterans Home, so the actual flow generated was used for analysis in the SewerCAD model. The East Hastings lift station was not included in the above analysis because it is not considered a trunk lift station.
Page 13
Table 5-5 below shows the estimated wastewater flow generation rates for each existing land use found through data calibration. These estimated wastewater flow generation rates were applied to sub-districts within each sewer district to develop a detailed SewerCAD model. The resulting calibrated estimated wastewater flow generation rates were very similar to other cities throughout the Twin Cities area for which WSB has completed Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plans. Non-residential area wastewater flows are typically found near 500 gpad and residential wastewater flows are typically found near 75 gpcd, with single family housing nearing 500 gpad. Table 5-5 Calibrated Estimated Wastewater Flow Generation Rates
Land Use Category Farmstead Single Family Housing Single Family Attached Multifamily Housing Manufactured Housing Park Office Retail and Commercial Industrial and Utility Institutional Park, Recreational or Preserve Golf Course Railway Agricultural Undeveloped Water Units/Acre Per/Unit Flow/Per (gpcd) 75 75 75 75 Flow/Acre (gpad) 0 450 675 900 900 500 500 500 500 10 10 0 0 0 0
2 3 4 4
3 3 3 3
5.3
Infiltration/Inflow
5.3.1 General Infiltration is water that enters the sanitary sewer system by entering through defects in the sewer pipes, joints, manholes, and service laterals, or by deliberate connection of building foundation drains. Water that enters the sewer system from cross connections with storm sewer, sump pumps, roof drains, or manhole covers is considered inflow.
Page 14
Water from inflow and infiltration can consume available capacity in the wastewater collection system and increase the hydraulic load on the treatment facility. In extreme cases, the added hydraulic load can cause bypasses or overflows of raw wastewater. This extra hydraulic load also necessitates larger capacity collection and treatment components, which results in increased capital, operation and maintenance, and replacement costs. As sewer systems age and deteriorate, I/I can become an increasing problem. Therefore, it is imperative that I/I be reduced whenever it is cost effective to do so. The MCES has established I/I goals for each community discharging wastewater into the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS). In February 2006, MCES adopted an I/I Surcharge Program that requires communities within their service area to eliminate excessive I/I over a period of time. The City of Hastings was not identified by MCES as a community with excessive I/I, therefore, is not on the MCES I/I Surcharge List. 5.3.2 I/I Analysis Included in the Citys System Statement for the 2030 Regional Development Framework adopted by the Metropolitan Council in 2004 was the Citys I/I goal for the years 2010, 2020, and 2030 based on MCES assumed flow increases. MCES assumed peak flow factors used as the limit for peak I/I flow rates are variable depending on the average flow. The sliding scale used by MCES has been included in Appendix 1. The Citys current peaking factors are below the MCES guidelines as shown in Table 5-6 below. Table 5-6 Existing Peak Flow Factors
Average Flow (MGD) Peak Flow (MGD) M602 3.850 3.353 4.631 3.663 4.254 City Peaking Factor 2.38 2.09 2.91 2.33 2.73 MCES Maximum Peak Factor 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9
Year
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
1.617 1.607 1.591 1.572 1.556
Page 15
5.3.3 Municipal I/I Reduction The Citys strategy for preventing excess I/I is based on requiring development to conform to City standards as new sewers are constructed and removing existing I/I by its annual street reconstruction program. Several streets within the City are reconstructed annually. As a part of street reconstruction projects, sanitary sewers are televised and replaced or lined if they are in poor condition. The City Code includes prohibiting the connection of eave troughs, rain spouts, footing drains, or any other conductor used to carry precipitation or ground water to the sanitary sewer system. In addition, any connection to the sanitary sewer must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. City Code requires that notification be provided to the City so any construction or altering of sewer service lines can be inspected prior to final completion. Construction of all sanitary sewers is observed to verify construction is in accordance with plans and City standards. All newly constructed sanitary sewers are televised and leak tested to confirm they have been constructed in accordance with City standards.
5.4
Evaluation of Existing Facilities
The existing system capacity analysis was completed by modeling the existing trunk sewer system using SewerCAD software. A SewerCAD model was developed for the existing trunk sewer system based on as-built information provided by the City. Wastewater flows were estimated for each sewer district, as discussed in the preceding sections, and included in the model. Estimated average wastewater flow generated in each sewer district was based on the application of wastewater flows per unit as discussed in section 5.2, and shown in Table 5-5. Table 5-7 shows the estimated existing wastewater flows in each sewer district. Table 5-7 Existing Sewer District Estimated Average Wastewater Flow
Sewer District North Northeast Northwest South South Central Southeast Southwest West Central Total System Estimated Average Flow (MGD) 0.370 0.093 0.256 0.049 0.095 0.426 0.037 0.337 1.663
Page 16
The SewerCAD model was completed based on the existing trunk sewer system as shown in Figure 5-1 which shows existing trunk sewers, lift stations, force mains, MCES facilities, and sewer districts. The trunk sewer system was divided into pipe lengths with collection points. Each district was broken down into sub-districts with one designated collection point. The collection point was assumed to be the location where the subdistricts flow entered the trunk system. The collection points were assumed conservatively and were determined based on estimating where the majority of laterals entered the trunk main. Based on the average estimated wastewater flow generation rates (Table 5-5) for each land use, average flows generated within each district were estimated. Estimated peak wastewater flows were used for pipe capacity analysis in the model, and were based on the estimated average flow within each sewer district as shown in Table 5-7. As discussed previously, estimated wastewater flows included in the model were further broken down by sub-district, not shown in Table 5-7, to provide analysis with greater detail. 5.4.1 Wastewater Treatment As discussed previously, the City of Hastings is responsible for wastewater collection only. Treatment is provided by MCES at the Hastings wastewater treatment plant that will be relocated in the near future. Based on discussion with MCES, the existing treatment plan has approximately 1.4 MGD remaining capacity. MCES indicated they plan to relocate the treatment plant as the Citys wastewater flow increases to the plants treatment capacity of 3.0 MGD. The treatment plant will be relocated to the southeast of the existing wastewater plant as shown in Figure 6-1. There are 4 remaining properties within the City with ISTSs. These properties are shown in Figure 5-2. Property owners with ISTSs are required to connect to the City collection system within one year of City service becoming available. 5.4.2 Lift Stations The City currently has eight lift stations in service, seven of which are trunk lift stations, and their locations are noted on Figure 5-1. The East Hastings Lift Station was not considered a trunk lift station because its service area does not include gravity sewers greater than 8 inches in diameter. The total capacity, existing flow, and remaining capacity for each trunk lift station is listed in Table 5-8. Existing peak wastewater flows were estimated based on typical MCES peaking factors included in Appendix 1.
Page 17
Table 5-8 Existing Lift Station Capacities and Flows

2007 Average Day Flow (GPD) 45,616 5,802 211,660 8,186 49,312 24,164 0 Estimated 2007 Peak Flow (GPDGPM) 182,464-127 23,208-16 804,308-559 32,744-23 197,248-137 96,656-67 0-0 Existing Lift Station Capacity (GPD-GPM) 360,000-250 460,800-320 1,728,000-1,200 432,000-300 763,200-530 432,000-300 172,800-120 Remaining Lift Station Capacity (GPD-GPM) 177,536-123 437,592-304 923,692-641 399,256-277 565,952-393 335,344-233 172,800-120
Lift Station E 10th St. Glendale Hts. HWY 55 Riverdale Tuttle Westwood General Sieben Dr.
Results from modeling indicated all existing lift stations have adequate capacity to convey existing peak wastewater flows. As shown in Table 5-8, all lift stations are utilizing 50% or less of their capacity. 5.4.3 Trunk Mains The existing City of Hastings sanitary sewer system is comprised of gravity sewers ranging in size from 6 inches in diameter to 27 inches in diameter. The City sanitary sewer mains flow to the wastewater treatment plant. Figure 5-1 shows the existing City sanitary sewers and existing wastewater treatment plant. As discussed previously, a SewerCAD model was developed to determine any deficiencies within the Citys existing trunk sewer system. Table 5-9 below shows the estimated peak flows used to evaluate the adequacy of the existing trunk sewer system. All peak flows shown in the above Table 5-9 are based on applied MCES peaking factors included in Appendix 1. Table 5-9 Existing System Peak Flows
Estimated Average Flow (MGD) 0.370 0.256 0.337 0.037 0.049 0.095 0.426 0.093 1.663 Cumulative Peak Flow (MGD) 1.330 0.946 2.015 0.150 0.346 2.554 1.491 3.879 Ex. Trunk Main Size (IN) 18 16 24 10 12 24 16 24 Ex. Trunk Main Capacity (MGD) 3.388 3.360 7.883 0.787 1.016 5.364 3.236 17.618 Flow Percentage of Capacity (%) 39.25% 28.15% 25.56% 19.02% 34.06% 47.61% 46.08% 22.02%
Sewer District North Northwest West Central Southwest South South Central Southeast Northeast Total System
Page 18
Figure 5-3 shows the results of the trunk sewer system model. Trunk mains have been color coded to identify remaining pipe capacity and the locations of lift stations are identified. Table 5-9 above shows only one section of trunk sewer main capacity, there are other sections of trunk main with less and more capacity than what is shown in the Table. Figure 5-3 shows the remaining capacity of each section of the trunk sewer system based on the estimated wastewater flow and asbuilts of each trunk sewer. Results from the modeling indicate the existing trunk sewer system has adequate capacity for conveying existing peak flows. There are a few sections of sewer main shown in Figure 5-3 where trunk sewers are nearing capacity (less than 250,000 gpd remaining), however, these bottlenecks are minimal and typical of most sewer systems. Due to the large upstream and downstream capacity on either side of each bottleneck section, only minimal surcharging is likely to occur under peak flow events. City staff confirmed that no sanitary overflows have been observed within the City. 5.4.4 Summary of Existing System Evaluation The SewerCAD model created for analysis of the existing system included the following parameters: Existing trunk mains 10-inches and larger (as-built information) Existing lift stations Existing trunk main flows (estimated per land use type and calibrated with flow meter data)
Results from modeling indicated the existing system infrastructure including gravity mains, lift stations, and force mains have adequate capacity to serve existing system flows. The existing trunk sewer system model evidenced no existing system deficiencies.
Page 19
6.0
FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM

6.1 Future Service Areas
Design of a cost effective future trunk sewer system is completed by defining a future sewer service area, determining how existing sewers would be extended to collect future wastewater flows from the future sewer service area, and analyzing the impact of future wastewater flows on the existing downstream sewers. Extension of the existing trunk sewer system to the future sewer service area is based on dividing the future sewer service area into major sewer districts and sub-districts. Selection of future sewer districts and sub-districts was generally governed by existing topography, other existing features such as roadways and conservation areas, and the future wastewater treatment plant location. Two future sewer service areas were defined: 1. The 2030 sewer service area as discussed in Section 3 and shown in Figure 3-3. 2. The ultimate sewer service area based on capacity limitations of the existing trunk sewer system and planned future treatment plant capacity is shown in Figure 6-1. Planning for the trunk sewer system beyond the 2030 boundary was important to identify potential trunk sewer corridors and preserve the corridors as development occurs. Analysis of the topography surrounding Hastings indicated existing gravity sewers could be extended beyond the 2030 sewer service area. Therefore, the extents of the ultimate sewer service area were not defined based on topography, but by existing trunk sewer system capacity limitations and the ultimate wastewater treatment plant capacity. Ultimate sewer districts are shown in Figure 6-1. Some trunk sewers could be difficult to reconstruct or increase capacity because of sewer location and depth in existing neighborhoods. Reconstruction of these trunk sewers could cause disruption to well established neighborhoods and could be very costly. As trunk sewers reach capacity, a more detailed analysis should be completed to determine whether or not to increase capacity or route wastewater flow around existing trunk sewers. The existing sewer service area consisted of eight sewer districts, six of which are not physically confined and able to be expanded as growth occurs. The topography of the ultimate sewer service area indicated the six unconfined existing sewer districts could be expanded to collect wastewater flows from the ultimate sewer service area as shown in Figure 6-1. The Sand Coulee natural area to the east limited expansion of the southeast district. The east and east-southeast sewer districts were added to the east of the Sand Coulee natural area to allow for expansion of the Citys sewer service area as the treatment plants capacity is increased. Figure 6-1 shows the existing sewer districts, ultimate sewer districts, and existing regional topography.
Page 20
The following is a brief summary of the steps taken to develop the ultimate and 2030 trunk sewer system: 1. Regional topography was analyzed to determine which trunk sewers could be extended to serve future development and their potential extents based on slope. 2. Potential future collection areas (preliminary sewer districts and sub-districts) were identified based on which trunk sewers would be extended. 3. Wastewater flow projections were developed for the preliminary sewer districts and sub-districts based on the 2030 land use. If the preliminary district was beyond the 2030 land use area, future land use was assumed to be future neighborhood. 4. The SewerCAD model for the existing trunk sewer system was used to model several potential trunk sewer extensions to the preliminary sewer districts and the effect of future wastewater flows on the existing trunk sewer system. 5. The ultimate potential service area was defined by limiting development extents depending on the remaining capacity of downstream critical sections of the trunk sewer system and the ultimate treatment plant capacity. Critical sections of trunk sewer for each sewer district are discussed further in this section. 6. The ultimate service area was divided into districts and sub-districts based on gravity sewer constraints, roadway boundaries, and conservation area constraints. Trunk sewers were routed with minimal crossing of the Vermillion River, Sand Coulee natural area, and with an outlet at the relocated wastewater treatment plant. 7. Ultimate sanitary sewer flows were generated for each sub-district based on the gross developable acreage and the 2030 land use. If the district was beyond the 2030 land use area, future land use was assumed to future residential neighborhood. The wastewater flow generation rates for the various land use categories discussed in this section were used to project future wastewater flows. 8. Ultimate trunk sewer extensions were laid out based on existing ground contours that govern how far the gravity trunk sewers can feasibly be extended. All trunk sewers were designed to be no deeper than 40 feet, no shallower than 8 feet from the existing ground surface, and to convey future peak wastewater flows at approximately 80% full or less. 9. The SewerCAD model of the existing trunk sewer system was expanded to collect ultimate wastewater flows and subsequently creating an ultimate trunk system SewerCAD model. Gravity trunk sewers, lift stations, and force mains necessary to accommodate the ultimate service area were then sized for peak sanitary sewer flows from those sub-districts, which are tributary to each particular trunk gravity sewer main or lift station.
Page 21
10. A 2030 trunk sewer system was designed based on the 2030 land use plan, with the intent of being a phase of the ultimate trunk sewer system. The 2030 trunk sewer system extended sewer only to the limits of the 2030 land use plan. The remaining developable area for the 2030 sewer service area, summarized in Table 31 and shown in Figure 3-3, has been further broken down by sewer district and is shown in Table 6-1 on the following page. Table 6-1 shows the amount of developable area in each sewer district by land use category.
6.2
Future Wastewater Flows

6.2.1 Estimated Unit Wastewater Flows Future sanitary sewer flows, in conjunction with available slope, govern the capacity of sanitary sewers. To project future sanitary flows, existing wastewater generated per land use (Section 5) and MCES recommendations were considered. MCES typically estimates 274 gpd/connection or 75-100 gpcd for residential estimates and 800 gpad for non-residential developments for interceptor sewers. On a local design level MCES recommends sizing sanitary sewers for greater than 800 gpad for non-residential. Typically 1,000 gpad for commercial/business park areas, and 1,500 gpad for industrial/mixed use areas. As discussed in Section 5, existing wastewater flow generated by non-residential land uses is estimated to be 500 gpad in Hastings and was used in project future wastewater flows. Although 500 gpad was assumed for future wastewater flow projections, there will likely be future individual generators that exceed 500 gpad. It is recommended to review wastewater flow generation rates for each new development to ensure conformance to the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan or make adjustments in the plant to accommodate future development. To ensure the existing trunk sewer system and its future extensions have adequate capacity, the following estimated flows per acre were assumed for future development:
1
Medium and High Density Housing 900 gpad Business Park 500 gpad Future Neighborhood 720 gpad1 Industrial 500 gpad Mixed Commercial and High Density Residential 1,000 gpad
Future Neighborhood development projected future flow per acre was based on the January 8, 2008, draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Based on that plan the following was assumed: Detached residential units would have a density of 3.5 units per net acre and attached residential units would have a density of 8 units per net acre. Plan projected 4,038 additional housing units on 829 net acres, which yields 4.8 units per net acre.
Page 22
It was assumed 50% of gross acres would be net acres of development once roads, common areas, and parks were considered, resulting in 2.4 units/gross acre. 3 people per unit would generate 100 gallons per day of wastewater each (100 gpcd) resulting in 720 gpad.
Page 23
Table 6-1 Summary of 2030 Gross Developable Acres by Sewer District1

Medium and High Density Housing 44 Mixed Commercial and High Density Residential Land Use 58 65 42 170
Sewer District
Future Neighborhood
Low Density
Industrial
Business Park
Institutional
Total
Northwest West Central Southwest South Southeast Northeast North South Central Total
255 1,040 447 342 200
2 1 1 2 10
360 1,318 448 342
9 2 84
211 96
2,284
16
46
123
126
170
10
2,775
Table 6-1 does not include land uses that do not generate wastewater flow (e.g. conservation, water, right-of-way). Also, land uses were not included in Table 6-1 for which no growth was projected within the 2030 service area (e.g. Downtown, commercial, retail). As discussed previously in Section 3, there are areas of inconsistent land use between the existing and future land use plans. City staff indicated that only future perimeter growth should be included in this plan since no major areas of redevelopment are projected. The existing trunk sewer system model will be maintained, and if redevelopment occurs within the existing sewer service area, it will be reviewed for the existing systems ability to convey future flows. East and East-Southeast districts were not included because they are not projected to generate wastewater flow prior to 2030.
Page 24
6.2.2 Future Sewer District Flows The estimated unit wastewater flows previously described were tied to the remaining developable acres (Figure 3-3 and Table 6-1) and potential service area (Figure 4-2 and Table 4-2) in to project the future average future flows to 2030 in five year increments as shown below in Table 6-2. East and East-Southeast districts were not included because they are not projected to generate wastewater flow prior to 2030. Table 6-2 Future Wastewater Flows by Sewer District Through 2030
2010 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.256 0.337 0.037 0.049 0.426 0.370 0.095 0.093 1.663 2015 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.359 0.440 0.037 0.049 0.522 0.370 0.095 0.093 1.965 2020 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.471 0.602 0.037 0.107 0.569 0.370 0.095 0.093 2.344 2025 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.471 0.696 0.145 0.165 0.569 0.370 0.095 0.093 2.604 2030 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.532 1.308 0.360 0.296 0.569 0.370 0.095 0.093 3.623
Sewer District
Northwest West Central Southwest South Southeast North South Central Northeast
Total Future Flow
As requested by MCES detailed flow projections for the years 2011-2015 are included in Table 6-3 below. Table 6-3 Future Wastewater Flows by Sewer District 2010 to 2015
2010 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.256 0.337 0.037 0.049 0.426 0.370 0.095 0.093 1.663 2011 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.277 0.358 0.037 0.049 0.445 0.370 0.095 0.093 1.724 2012 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.297 0.378 0.037 0.049 0.464 0.370 0.095 0.093 1.783 2013 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.318 0.399 0.037 0.049 0.483 0.370 0.095 0.093 1.844 2014 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.338 0.419 0.037 0.049 0.502 0.370 0.095 0.093 1.903 2015 Avg. Flow (MGD) 0.359 0.440 0.037 0.049 0.522 0.370 0.095 0.093 1.965
Sewer District
Northwest West Central Southwest South Southeast North South Central Northeast
Total Future Flow
Page 25
6.3
Future Trunk Sanitary Sewer System
The 2030 trunk sewer system layout is shown in Figure 6-2. The ultimate trunk sewer system is shown in Figure 6-3. Both figures show the proposed trunk sewers, lift stations, force mains, and sewer districts. The existing system SewerCAD model was expanded for the future trunk system based on estimated collection points for each future sewer district. Trunk sewers were extended from the existing trunk sewer system and sized based on the peak wastewater flow generated from the future sewer districts. The SewerCAD model was also used to identify any downstream capacity limitations in the existing trunk sewer system when future wastewater flow was generated. The sanitary sewer collection system must be capable of handling not only average flows, but also the anticipated peak flows. These peak flows can be expressed as a variable ratio applied to average daily flow rates. This variable ratio, called the peak flow factor, has been found to decrease as average flow increases. The peak flow factors applied in this study are listed in Appendix 1. These values were obtained from MCES. They are generally considered conservative, and are widely used for planning in municipalities throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area. 6.3.1 North District The north sewer district includes a wide variety of existing land uses and is generally located in the north central area of the City. Land uses for the area include mostly single family residential with the exception of the US 61 corridor and downtown. The US 61 corridor and downtown consist of commercial, industrial, and institutional land uses. There are no plans for redevelopment in the district included in the future land use plan. Existing sanitary sewers range in size from 8 to 15-inches in diameter and flow to the northeast corner of the district where the treatment plant is located. No additional trunk sewer improvements will be necessary in this district since there are no potential changes in wastewater flows. Existing system analysis, discussed in Section 5, indicated the existing trunk sewer system has adequate capacity to convey existing wastewater flows. The wastewater treatment plant is located on the border of the north and northeast districts; however, trunk sewer improvements necessary for treatment plant relocation are discussed in the northeast district section.
Page 26
6.3.2 South Central District The south central sewer district consists mostly of single family land use, although there are a few parcels of institutional and commercial land uses near the US 61 corridor. The district is generally located in the central area of the City. There are no plans for redevelopment in the district included in the future land use plan. Existing sanitary sewers range in size from 8 to 24 inches in diameter and flow to south to the Citys main interceptor. The main interceptor flows from southwest to northeast along CR 47 near the southern boundary of the district. Wastewater flows from the northern part of the district flow to the Westwood lift station, and then are pumped south through a 6-inch force main to the main interceptor. The Westwood lift station has a capacity of 300 gpm and receives an estimated peak flow of 67 gpm, therefore the lift station has 233 gpm capacity remaining. Trunk sewer improvements will be necessary in this district although there are no potential changes in wastewater flows generated in the district. As discussed in the west central district section, after peak wastewater flows increase to 5.6 MGD in the main interceptor, as a result of development in other districts, construction of additional capacity for the main interceptor could be triggered. Main interceptor capacity could be added by construction of a parallel interceptor, increasing the size of the existing interceptor, or a combination of both, as shown in Figures 6-2 and 6-3. A detailed evaluation is recommended to determine the most cost effective construction method for adding interceptor capacity and project phasing as wastewater flows increase to the trigger point. For this study it was assumed that pipe bursting construction methods could be used to increase the capacity of the main interceptor sewer section in the south central district. The existing main interceptor is 24-inches in diameter and could be increased to 30-inches. It would be difficult to construct a parallel interceptor through this section due to the proximity of established neighborhoods and the Vermillion River. 6.3.3 Northwest District and Expansion The northwest sewer district consists of a variety of land uses although single family land use is the greatest. Other land uses in the district include institutional, commercial, office, park, and multifamily housing. The district is located in the northwest area of the City and is at the northwest extents of the existing sewer service area. Existing sanitary sewers range in size from 8 to 16-inches in diameter and flow generally from northwest to southeast just south of CR 42 to the districts main lift station (Highway 55 lift station) which pumps wastewater via 12-inch force main to the west central district. Wastewater flows from north of CR 42 are collected by the Riverdale lift station and pumped south through an 8-inch force
Page 27
main along Pleasant Drive to the existing 15-inch trunk sewer ultimately flowing to the Highway 55 lift station. This district currently has some of the greatest growth pressure. Future development is expected to grow north and west from the existing sewer service area. The ultimate sewer service boundary was established based on the capacity of the existing trunk sewer located on Louis Lane. Discussions with City staff indicated increasing the capacity of the Louis Lane trunk sewer might be difficult because of the potential disruption within a well established neighborhood. For planning purposes it was assumed that once the trunk sewer reaches 90% of total capacity, a different trunk sewer route would likely convey wastewater flows out of the northwest district. As wastewater flows increase a more detailed evaluation can be completed to determine feasibility of reconstruction of the Louis Lane trunk sewer. The existing wastewater flow in the district was estimated to be 0.256 MGD on average and 0.947 peak flow. The capacity of the Louis Lane trunk sewer is 2.3 MGD, so future peak wastewater flows were designed for 90% of the trunk sewers total capacity (2.07 MGD) to be conservative. Therefore, ultimate flows from the northwest district and the section of the west central district upstream of the Louis Lane section are projected to 2.07 MGD peak flow or 0.610 MGD average flow. 2030 wastewater flows would be less than 0.610 MGD, 0.532 MGD as shown in Table 6-2 because there is additional area within the ultimate service area not planned to be developed by 2030 (Figure 4-2). The ultimate future wastewater flow increase would require increasing the capacity of the existing Highway 55 lift station from 1,200 GPM to 1,400 GPM. Implementation of the plan in this district will likely be difficult in terms phasing, and a temporary lift station may be required for service during an interim development period. Prior to construction of any trunk sewer extension in this district, it is recommended to complete a more detailed evaluation of phasing in this district. Increasing average flows to 0.61 MGD resulted in an ultimate service area less than the 2030 development area included in the land use plan within the northwest district. In order to collect wastewater flows from the 2030 sewer service area, the west central sewer district was expanded to the north to collect wastewater flow from the remaining parcels not able to be conveyed through the northwest district trunk sewers. 6.3.4 West Central District and Expansion The west central sewer district consists mainly of single family land use but also includes some office, institutional, retail, industrial, multifamily housing, and golf course land uses. The district is located at the western extents of the existing sewer service area.
Page 28
The main trunk sewer flows from the northern edge of the district south to the southeast corner of the district along Louis Lane. The upstream end of the main trunk sewer is 15-inches in diameter, but increases to 24-inches prior to the downstream connection with the Citys main interceptor. Lateral sanitary sewers range in size from 8 to 15 inches in diameter and flow from west to east to the main trunk sewer running from north to south. The only existing lift station in the district is located in the southwest corner of the district near the Vermillion River. The General Sieben Drive lift station currently has a very small service area and pumps through an 8-inch force main to a 10-inch trunk sewer running along Southview Drive. The existing capacity of the General Sieben Drive lift station is 120 GPM. The west central districts ultimate size is limited by the capacity of the downstream main interceptor flowing from southwest to northeast along CR 47. Based on discussions with City staff, it would be possible to construct a parallel interceptor along the same route as the existing main interceptor. The existing wastewater flow in the district was estimated to be 0.337 MGD on average. The capacity of the downstream main City interceptor is approximately 7.6 MGD in many of the capacity limiting sections. Once future flows from the cumulative northwest, west central, south, southeast, and southwest districts reaches 5.6 MGD or 75% of the capacity of the existing main interceptor, it could trigger the construction of a parallel interceptor sewer. The potential development extents that would trigger construction of the parallel interceptor are shown in Figure 6-3. Based on the land use phasing plan (Figure 4-2), development prior to 2020 could be accommodated in the existing main interceptor before additional capacity in the main interceptor would be required. An ultimate sewer district has been identified in Figure 6-1 and 6-3 showing service to approximately 2,350 future acres beyond the 2030 service area in the west central district. The extent of the ultimate district was determined under the assumption that the Citys main interceptor would collect wastewater flows from the northeast, south central, northwest, west central, southwest, south, and southeast districts to the 2030 sewer service area boundary. After development encompasses the 2030 sewer service area, the west central district could be expanded until total flow from all districts, with the exception of east and eastsoutheast, was equal to the capacity of relocated wastewater treatment plant, 5.0 MGD average flow. The peaking factor for 5.0 MGD is 2.4, so the ultimate capacity of the main interceptor could to equal 12 MGD to convey an average flow of 5.0 MGD. Therefore, the ultimate capacity of the main interceptor, including the parallel interceptor addition, was designed for 15 MGD peak flow so ultimate peak flows in the main interceptor would equal 75% of the main interceptors ultimate capacity. Extension of the east interceptor and other trunk sewers from the future treatment plan could provide sewer service to the east and east-southeast districts once development exceeds the 2030 sewer service area and growth is occurring in the ultimate west central district.
Page 29
The main collection point for the ultimate west central district would be the existing CR 46 lift station as shown in Figure 6-3. Trunk sewers extending from the CR 46 would range from 8 to 36-inches in diameter. The ultimate capacity of the CR 46 lift station would be 4,400 GPM and would pump wastewater to the main City interceptor, which would be extended southwest along CR 46 and 47 as a 36-inch trunk sewer. Reconstructing the existing 10-inch trunk sewer along Southview Drive might be difficult because of the potential disruption within a well established neighborhood so, future flows would be routed through the force main along CR 46 and 47 to the main City interceptor extension. Two additional lift stations, with capacities of 350 and 700 GPM, would be necessary to collect wastewater generated from the northern area of the district. Northwest district mains could serve the northern area however, capacity of existing downstream sections in the northwest district limit the capacity of upstream development. The 2030 sewer service area would essentially be a phase of the ultimate trunk sewer system. Since the ultimate service area would extend beyond the 2030 service area, trunk sewers would be installed that could be extended to serve the ultimate service area as shown in Figure 6-2. 6.3.5 Southwest District and Expansion Only single family, single family attached, parks, and conservation land uses are in the exiting southwest district. The district is located in the southwest corner of the City south of the Vermillion River and is at the southwest extents of the existing sewer service area. Existing sewer service area in the southwest district consists largely of 8-inch collection mains that ultimately flow northeast to the 12-inch trunk sewer conveying wastewater flows out of the district and ultimately to the main City interceptor along CR 47. There are no existing lift stations in the Southwest district. Future development is expected to grow southwest from the existing sewer service area. The ultimate sewer service boundary was established based on the ultimate treatment plant capacity of 10.0 MGD. Wastewater generated in the southwest district could flow to the main interceptor flowing southwest to northeast along CR 47. As development approaches 2030 sewer service boundary, development may be limited until an east interceptor can be extended to collect wastewater generated beyond the 2030 sewer service area. The existing wastewater flow in the district was estimated to be 0.037 MGD on average and 0.148 peak flow through the 12-inch trunk sewer. As discussed in the west central district section, after peak wastewater flows increase to 5.6 MGD the parallel interceptor could be triggered which would replace the existing 12inch trunk sewer currently flowing into the main interceptor with a 27-inch trunk sewer that would become a section of the Citys main interceptor. A 36-inch
Page 30
trunk sewer flowing from the west central district would be immediately upstream of the 27-inch section through the southwest district. It was assumed the 27-inch trunk sewer would be constructed at the same grade as the existing 12-inch main, which have the same capacity as a 36-inch main constructed at minimum grade. A 15-inch diameter trunk sewer could be extended to collect flows from the 2030 sewer service area and flow into the 27-inch main interceptor. Wastewater generated by the ultimate sewer service area could be collected by the east interceptor that would range in size from 15 to 21-inches in diameter in the southwest district. 6.3.6 South District and Expansion Existing land uses in the south district include single family housing, single family attached, parks, and conservation. The south district is located at the southern extents of the existing sewer service area and south of the Vermillion River. The south district sanitary sewer system consists of 8-inch collection mains flowing into an 18-inch trunk main flowing from south to north where that ties into the main City interceptor along CR 47. The existing main interceptor is a 12inch diameter sewer at the connection point. There are no existing lift stations in the south district. The future land use plan indicates development in the district will expand south from the existing sewer service area. The ultimate sewer service boundary was established based on the ultimate capacity of the future treatment plant (10.0 MGD). Wastewater generated in the south district could flow to the main interceptor flowing southwest to northeast along CR 47. As development approaches 2030 sewer service boundary, development may be limited until an east interceptor can be extended to collect wastewater generated beyond the 2030 sewer service area. The existing average wastewater flow in the district was estimated to be 0.049 MGD on average and 0.196 peak flow through the existing 18-inch trunk sewer. As discussed in the west central district section, once wastewater flows increase to 5.6 MGD an increase in capacity of the main interceptor could be triggered which could replace the existing 12-inch trunk sewer currently flowing into the main interceptor with a 30-inch trunk sewer that would become a section of the Citys main interceptor. It was assumed the 30-inch trunk sewer would be constructed at the same grade as the existing 12-inch trunk sewer. A 15-inch diameter trunk sewer could be extended south from the existing 18inch trunk main to collect flows from the 2030 sewer service area. Also, a 250 GPM lift station may be required to collect wastewater generated in the western part of the district within the 2030 sewer service area.
Page 31
Wastewater generated by the ultimate sewer service area could be collected by a future trunk sewer, ranging in size from 18 to 24-inches flowing south to north into a future east interceptor. The east interceptor flowing east from the southwest district could be 21-inches in diameter until meeting the 24-inch trunk sewer, at which point a lift station might be required to pump wastewater to the southeast district with a capacity of 3,700 GPM. 6.3.7 Southeast District and Expansion Existing land uses in the Southeast district vary widely and include single family housing, manufactured housing park, multifamily housing, single family attached, retail and commercial, institutional, industrial and utility, office, and conservation. The Southeast district is located at the southeastern extents of the existing sewer service area, south the Vermillion River and west of the Hastings Sand Coulee prairie area. The trunk sewer conveying existing wastewater flows in the Southeast district consists of 8-inch collection mains flowing into a west trunk main (10-inch diameter) and an east trunk main (10-inch to 18-inch diameter) that ultimately flow northeast to the main City interceptor along CR 47. There are two existing lift stations in the Southeast district. The Tuttle lift station is located in the far southeast corner and has an existing capacity of 530 GPM. The Glendale lift station is near the western extents of the district and has a capacity of 320 GPM. The future land use plan indicates development in the district will expand south and east from the existing sewer service area. The ultimate sewer service boundary was established based on the ultimate capacity of the future treatment plant (10.0 MGD). Wastewater generated in the southeast district could flow to the main interceptor flowing southwest to northeast along CR 47. As development approaches 2030 sewer service boundary, development may be limited until an east interceptor can be extended to collect wastewater generated beyond the 2030 sewer service area. The existing wastewater flow in the district was estimated to be 0.426 MGD on average and 1.491 peak flow through the existing 18-inch interceptor. It is not likely that additional trunk sewer would be extended to collect future wastewater flows from the 2030 sewer service area and lift station capacity increases would likely not be necessary. Wastewater generated by the ultimate sewer service area could be collected by a trunk sewer, ranging in size from 10 to 12-inches flowing south to north into a future east interceptor. Due to the sensitivity of the Sand Coulee prairie area, the east interceptor could cross the Sand Coulee area adjacent to MN 316 and flow to a lift station in the east-southeast district on the east side of the Sand Coulee prairie area. The east interceptor flowing through the south district would be 36inches in diameter.
Page 32
6.3.8 Northeast District The northeast sewer district is located directly east of the existing north district and includes mostly single family housing land use, however there are other existing land uses of industrial and utility, institutional, and commercial. There are no plans for redevelopment in the district included in the future land use plan, with the exception of the future wastewater treatment plant. The future wastewater treatment plant is identified as industrial land use in the future land use plan shown in Figure 3-2. Existing sanitary sewers in the district are typically 8-inch collection mains with the exception of the main interceptor flowing from south to north through the district. The existing main interceptor ranges in size from 21 to 27-inches in diameter flowing to the existing treatment plant at the northwest corner of the district where the treatment plant is located. The existing treatment plant has a capacity of 3.0 MGD and is confined in the downtown area. MCES plans to relocate the treatment plant southeast of the City as wastewater flows increase to near plant capacity. Based on discussions with MCES, the treatment plant would be constructed initially with an average flow capacity of 5.0 MGD, but ultimately expandable to 10.0 MGD average flow capacity. Although there are no plans for redevelopment within this district future trunk sewer system improvements may be required. Future development in other sewer districts will likely increase the existing main interceptor wastewater flows beyond capacity. In addition, the existing trunk sewer system may have to be configured to convey wastewater flows to the future treatment plant location. The ultimate district boundary was expanded to include the future wastewater treatment plant, but future wastewater flows would not be generated in this district as shown in Table 6-2. Existing wastewater flow generated in the district was estimated to be 0.093 MGD on average and 0.372 peak flow. As discussed in the west central district section, after peak wastewater flows increase to 5.6 MGD, an increase in main interceptor capacity could be triggered. An 18-inch parallel trunk sewer could be added to the existing 21-inch main interceptor from TH 291 (LeDuc Drive) to Ravenna Trail. Also, a parallel 27-inch trunk sewer would be added to the existing 27 to 24-inch main interceptor section from MN 316 to TH 291 (LeDuc Drive). It was assumed the parallel interceptors would be constructed at the same grade as the existing main interceptor. At the time of construction of the parallel interceptor, relocation of the treatment plant should be coordinated with MCES since the existing treatment plant will be nearing capacity. A detailed evaluation is recommended to determine the most cost effective construction method for adding interceptor capacity and project phasing as wastewater flows increase to the trigger point.
Page 33
Additional trunk sewer improvements would be required to route flows to the future wastewater treatment plant location near the intersection of Ravenna Trail and CSAH 91 (Glendale Road). The parallel 18-inch interceptor and the existing interceptor could be tied together and flow southeast along Ravenna Trail in a combined main interceptor ranging in size from 36 to 42 inches in diameter to the relocated treatment plant. Also, a 1,000 GPM lift station could be constructed at the existing treatment plant location to pump wastewater south to the expanded 36-inch main interceptor flowing to the future treatment plant. The lift station would pump wastewater generated in the north district and some of the northeast district. The trigger point for construction of the parallel interceptor includes development projected to approximately the year 2020, so all improvements in this district would likely be constructed by 2030. 6.3.9 East-Southeast District The east-southeast district is an ultimate sewer district. There is no existing eastsoutheast district as shown in Figure 6-1. Existing land uses in the east-southeast district includes agriculture and conservation. Existing land uses generate minimal wastewater and there is no existing sanitary sewer in the district. The future land use plan does not include any land uses that would generate wastewater in the district. As discussed in the west central district section, wastewater flows from the 2030 sewer service area could be collected by the Citys main interceptor and conveyed to the future wastewater treatment plant. Once wastewater flows increase to 5.6 MGD peak flow, construction of a parallel main interceptor, relocation of the treatment plant, and routing of existing flows to the future treatment plant could occur. Also, once the treatment plant is relocated, an east interceptor could be extended from the treatment plant south along Nicolai Avenue, which would allow development in the east-southeast district. Wastewater generated by the ultimate sewer service area could be collected by the east interceptor, which could be 42-inches in diameter flowing south to north along Nicolai Avenue through the district to the future treatment plant relocation. The east interceptor could collect wastewater generated in the ultimate southwest, south, and southeast districts in addition to the east-southeast district. Due to the sensitivity of the Sand Coulee prairie area, the east interceptor would cross the Sand Coulee area adjacent to MN 316 and flow to a lift station in the eastsoutheast district on the east side of the Sand Coulee prairie area along MN 316. The lift station would have a capacity of 5,250 GPM and pump flows north to the 36-inch east interceptor along Nicolai Avenue.
Page 34
Initial development will likely generate minimal flow relative to the capacity of the ultimate 42-inch trunk main possibly making maintenance difficult. Therefore, it is recommended to preserve the corridor for ultimate trunk sewer construction, but initially a smaller diameter trunk sewer may be constructed. As development pressures increase in this district a more detailed evaluation can be completed to determine phasing of the east interceptor. No improvements would be necessary in this district for the 2030 sewer service area. It is possible to convey wastewater flows from the 2030 sewer service area and the ultimate west central district through the main interceptor to the future wastewater treatment plant prior to extending the east interceptor to increase development in the east-southeast district. 6.3.10 East District Similar to the east-southeast district, the east district is an ultimate sewer district. Existing land uses in the east-southeast district consist of agriculture and conservation. Existing land uses generate minimal wastewater and there is no existing sanitary sewer in the district. The future land use plan does not include land uses that would generate wastewater. Service to the east district is mostly dependent on relocation of the treatment plant. Relocation of the treatment plant is anticipated to occur as development reaches the trigger point for additional main interceptor capacity as discussed in the west central district section and shown in Figure 6-3, which could occur near the year 2020. Wastewater generated by the ultimate east district could be collected by a trunk sewer ranging in size from 21 to 27-inches in diameter and flowing south to north through the district to the future treatment plant relocation. Also, a 940 GPM capacity lift station would be necessary to collect wastewater flows from the far southern area of the east district. No improvements would be necessary in this district for the 2030 sewer service area. It is possible to convey wastewater flows from the 2030 sewer service area and the ultimate west central district through the main interceptor to the future wastewater treatment plant before expanding development in the eastern districts.
Page 35
7.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (CIP)

7.1 Estimated Cost of Trunk System Improvements
The projected 2030 trunk sewer system was broken down into phases in accordance with development phasing as included in Table 4-2 and shown in Figure 4-2. The overall cost associated with trunk system components over the next 22 years is estimated to be approximately $13,912,000 in 2007 dollars. Table 7-1 summarizes the trunk improvement costs necessary for each phase of development. Detailed cost estimates for each development phase are available in Appendix 2. Furthermore, phasing of trunk sewer construction to serve the 2030 sewer service area is shown Figure 7-1. Future improvement costs were based on 2007 construction prices, including a 20% construction contingency, and including 20% overhead (i.e., legal, engineering, and administrative). Street and easement costs and other miscellaneous costs that may be related to final construction are not included. Table 7-1 Capital Improvement Plan Summary
District 2010-2015 2015-2020 2020-2025 2025-2030 Total Total $2,920,000 $7,604,000 $1,138,000 $2,250,000 $13,912,000
1. Costs are for budgeting purposes only, and are subject to change as projects are studied, designed, and constructed. 2. Costs are estimated based on 2007 construction costs. 3. Land acquisition costs are not included.
Page 36
FIGURES
APPENDIX 1 MCES Peaking Factors
MCES Hourly Peaking Factor Appendix 1 Average Flow Range (mgd) MCES Peaking Factor 0 - 0.11 4.0 0.12 - 0.18 3.9 0.19 - 0.23 3.8 0.24 - 0.29 3.7 0.30 - 0.39 3.6 0.40 - 0.49 3.5 0.50 - 0.64 3.4 0.65 - 0.79 3.3 0.80 - 0.99 3.2 1.00 - 1.19 3.1 1.20 - 1.49 3.0 1.50 - 1.89 2.9 1.90 - 2.29 2.8 2.30 - 2.89 2.7 2.90 - 3.49 2.6 3.50 - 4.19 2.5 4.20 - 5.09 2.4 5.10 - 6.39 2.3 6.40 - 7.99 2.2 8.00 - 10.39 2.1 10.40 - 13.49 2.0 13.50 - 17.99 1.9 18.00 - 29.99 1.8 Over 30.00 1.7
K:\01784-00\Water - Wastewater\Excel\Flow\Report tables.xlsAppx 1
APPENDIX 2 Development Phase Cost Estimates
Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan

City of Hastings MN 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Plan
Item No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Description
Gen. Sieben Dr. LS UPGRADE TO 4,400 GPM (Standard submersible type, no stand-by generator) 18" PVC FORCE MAIN (Gen. Sieben Dr. LS to Main Interceptor) 8" PVC SEWER 12" PVC SEWER (NW District) 27" RCP SEWER (Reconstruction of existing Main Interceptor) 30" RCP SEWER (Business Park to Gen. Sieben Dr. LS) 30" RCP SEWER (Reconstruction of existing Main Interceptor) 36" RCP SEWER (Extension of existing Main Interceptor west) SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION (TELEVISING) CONST 48" DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE CASTING ASSEMBLY
Unit
LUMP SUM LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT EACH EACH
Estimated Total Quantity

1.00 1800.00 9500.00 1550.00 1550.00 3000.00 650.00 1900.00 8650.00 34.60 34.60
Estimated Unit Price

$550,000.00 $52.00 $0.00 $60.00 $180.00 $140.00 $200.00 $175.00 $1.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 SUB TOTAL Cont. 20% SUB TOTAL
Estimated Total Cost

$550,000.00 $93,600.00 $0.00 $93,000.00 $279,000.00 $420,000.00 $130,000.00 $332,500.00 $8,650.00 $103,800.00 $17,300.00 $2,027,850.00 $405,570.00 $2,433,420.00 $486,680.00 $2,920,100.00
Engr/Legal 20% TOTAL
K:\01784-00\Water - Wastewater\Excel\Cost\Cost estimates2010-2015

Item No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Description
1,000 GPM LS at WWTP (Standard submersible type, no stand-by generator) 8" PVC FORCE MAIN (WWTP to Main Interceptor) 12" PVC SEWER (NW District extension) 15" PVC SEWER (WC and S District extensions) 18" RCP SEWER (WC District extension) 18" RCP SEWER (North Section of Parallel Main Interceptor) 21" RCP SEWER (WC District extension) 30" RCP SEWER (West to East Section of Parallel Main Interceptor) 36" RCP SEWER (West Section of Main Interceptor to Relocated WWTP) 42" RCP SEWER (East Section of Main Interceptor to Relocated WWTP) SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION (TELEVISING) CONST 48" DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE CASTING ASSEMBLY
Unit
LUMP SUM LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT EACH EACH

1.00 3400.00 2000.00 4550.00 6425.00 2900.00 2000.00 7150.00 2500.00 4350.00 31875.00 127.50 127.50

$400,000.00 $36.00 $44.00 $70.00 $90.00 $120.00 $105.00 $200.00 $175.00 $200.00 $1.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 SUB TOTAL Cont. 20% SUB TOTAL

$400,000.00 $122,400.00 $88,000.00 $318,500.00 $578,250.00 $348,000.00 $210,000.00 $1,430,000.00 $437,500.00 $870,000.00 $31,875.00 $382,500.00 $63,750.00 $5,280,775.00 $1,056,160.00 $6,336,935.00 $1,267,390.00 $7,604,325.00

Item No.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Description
700 GPM LS in WC District (Standard submersible type, no stand-by generator) 6" PVC FORCE MAIN (WC District Extension) 18" RCP SEWER (SW District Extension) SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION (TELEVISING) CONST 48" DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE CASTING ASSEMBLY
Unit
LUMP SUM LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT EACH EACH

1.00 2600.00 3400.00 3400.00 13.60 13.60

$350,000.00 $32.00 $90.00 $1.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 SUB TOTAL Cont. 20% SUB TOTAL

$350,000.00 $83,200.00 $306,000.00 $3,400.00 $40,800.00 $6,800.00 $790,200.00 $158,040.00 $948,240.00 $189,650.00 $1,137,890.00

Item No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Description
230 GPM LS in S District (Standard submersible type, no stand-by generator) HWY 55 UPGRADE (1,400 GPM Standard submersible type, no stand-by generator) 350 GPM LS in WC District (Standard submersible type, no stand-by generator) 4" PVC FORCE MAIN (Extensions in WC and S Districts) 8" PVC SEWER 12" PVC SEWER (WC District extension) 15" PVC SEWER (WC and SW District extensions) SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION (TELEVISING) CONST 48" DIA SAN SEWER MANHOLE CASTING ASSEMBLY
Unit
LUMP SUM LUMP SUM LUMP SUM LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT EACH EACH

1.00 1.00 1.00 4500.00 2200.00 2050.00 7350.00 11600.00 46.40 46.40

$250,000.00 $100,000.00 $275,000.00 $28.00 $0.00 $60.00 $70.00 $1.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 SUB TOTAL Cont. 20% SUB TOTAL

$250,000.00 $100,000.00 $275,000.00 $126,000.00 $0.00 $123,000.00 $514,500.00 $11,600.00 $139,200.00 $23,200.00 $1,562,500.00 $312,500.00 $1,875,000.00 $375,000.00 $2,250,000.00
V U
42
N i in ng er R d.

61 W. 2nd St.
City of Hastings Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan

Figure 3-1 Existing Land Use Legend
V U
55
Municipal Boundaries
W. 8th St.
Land Use Farmstead

Vermillion St.
Single Family Housing Single Family Attached Multifamily Housing

R aven n a Tra
W. 15th St.
Jacob Ave.
V U
291
LeDuc Drive
il
Manufactured Housing Park Office Retail and Commercial

Glendale Road
Industrial and Utility Institutional Park, Recreational or Preserve Golf Course Railway Agricultural Undeveloped
V U
47 160th St. E.
V U
91
V U
47

61 170th St. E.
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_3_1_ Existing_Land_Use.mxd
0 0.25 0.5 Miles
Water
Nicolai Ave.
V U
316
V U
42

61 W. 2nd St.

Legend Figure 3-2 Future Land Use
N i in ng er R d.
Future Neighborhood
V U
55
W. 8th St.
Low Density Housing
V U
55
Vermillion St.
Medium & High Density Housing Mixed Commercial and High Density Residential Land Use Commercial, Retail, Service or Office Downtown
LeDuc Drive
R aven n a Tra il
W. 15th St.
Jacob Ave.
Industrial Business Park Institutional Park

Glendale Road
V U
291
Golf Course Agriculture or Very Low Density Housing Conservation Right of Way Approximate Stage One Development
160th St. E.
V U
91
V U
47 170th St. E.

61
0.25
0.5 Miles
Nicolai Ave.
V U
316
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_3_2_Future_Land_Use.mxd
V U
42
Ni ni
ng
er
Rd

W. 2nd St.
61

Figure 3-3 Gross Developable Acreages
Downtown Industrial Business Park Institutional Park Golf Course Agriculture or Very Low Density Housing Conservation Right of Way
V U
55
W. 8th St.
Legend
Vermillion St.
Ex Municipal Bdry Sanitary Pipes Existing Sewer Service Area

LeDuc Drive
R aven n a Tra il
W. 15th St.
Future Neighborhood Low Density Housing Medium & High Density Housing Mixed Commercial and High Density Residential Land Use Commercial, Retail, Service or Office
Jacob Ave.
V U
291
160th St. E.
Glendale Road
V U
91
Nicolai Ave.
V U
47 170th St. E.

61
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_3_3_Gross_Developable_Acres.mxd
V U
316
0 0.25 0.5 Miles 1
Figure 4-1 Historical and Projected Population

35,000

Figure 4-1 Population Projections
30,000
25,000
Population
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0 1880
1900
1920
1940
1960 Year
1980
2000
2020
2040
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_4_1_Population_Projections.mxd
V U
42
N i in ng er R d.

61 W. 2nd St.

Figure 4-2 Future Land Use Development Phasing
V U
55
W. 8th St.
V U
55
Vermillion St.
W. 15th St.
Jacob Ave.
V U
291
LeDuc Drive
R aven
n a Tra
Legend
il
Year
Current
2010 - 2015
Glendale Road
2015 - 2020 2020 - 2025 2025 - 2030 Ex Municipal Bdry
V U
47 160th St. E.
V U
91
2030 Swr Svc Area Bdry
Nicolai Ave.
V U
47 170th St. E.

61
0.25
0.5 Miles
V U
316
V U
42
Ni ni
RIVERDALE LS 432,000 GPD / 300 GPM CAPACITY
HWY 55 LS 1,728,000 GPD / 1,200 GPM CAPACITY
ng
er
HASTINGS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 3.0 MGD CAPACITY EAST HASTINGS LS 115,000 GPD / 80 GPM CAPACITY
Rd

61 W. 2nd St.

Figure 5-1 Existing Sanitary Sewer System
V U
55
W. 8th St.
Vermillion St.
10th STREET LS 360,000 GPD / 250 GPM CAPACITY
Legend
Lift Station Sanitary Pipes 4 District North North East North West South South Central South East South West West Central
W. 15th St.
Jacob Ave.
V U
291
LeDuc Drive
R aven
n a Tra
il
6 8 10
Glendale Road
12 15
GLENDALE LS 460,800 GPD / 320 GPM CAPACITY
16 18 21 24 27
V U
91 160th St. E.
GENERAL SIEBEN DRIVE LS 172,800 GPD / 120 GPM CAPACITY WESTWOOD LS 432,000 GPD / 300 GPM CAPACITY
Forcemain
Nicolai Ave.
Sub Districts
V U
47 170th St. E.

61
V U
316
TUTTLE LS 763,200 GPD / 530 GPM CAPACITY
0.25
0.5 Miles
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_5_1_Existing_ Sanitary_Sewer_System.mxd
V U
42

61 W. 2nd St.

Figure 5-2 Existing ISTS Legend
ISTS
in N in ge d. rR
V U
55
W. 8th St.
W. 15th St.
Vermillion St.
Jacob Ave.
V U
291
LeDuc Drive
Raven n
a Trail
160th St. E.
V U
91

61 170th St. E.
V U
316
Nicolai Ave.
V U
47
Glendale Road
0 0.25 0.5 Miles 1
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_5_2_ Existing_ISTS.mxd
RIVERDALE LS 399,000 GPD / 277 GPM CAPACITY REMAINING
V U
42
HASTINGS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 1.4 MGD CAPACITY REMAINING
Ni ni
ng
er
Rd
HWY 55 LS 924,000 GPD / 641 GPM CAPACITY REMAINING
61

Figure 5-3 Existing Remaining Sewer Capacity Legend
V U
55
W. 8th St.
Vermillion St.
V U
55 W. 15th St.
10th STREET LS 178,000 GPD / 123 GPM CAPACITY REMAINING
WESTWOOD LS 335,000 GPD / 233 GPM CAPACITY REMAINING
V U
291
LeDuc Drive
R aven
n a Tra
il
Range
Lift Station
< = 250,000 < = 500,000

Glendale Road
< = 750,000 < = 1,000,000 < = 5,000,000 5,000,000 + Sub Districts
V U
91 160th St. E.
GLENDALE LS 438,000 GPD / 304 GPM CAPACITY REMAINING
GENERAL SIEBEN DRIVE LS 173,000 GPD / 120 GPM CAPACITY REMAINING
V U
47

61 170th St. E.
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_5_3_Existing_Remaining_Sewer.mxd
0 0.25 0.5 Miles 1
TUTTLE LS 565,000 GPD / 233 GPM CAPACITY REMAINING
V U
316
Nicolai Ave.
690
700
740 780
780
820
760
810
78
730
73 0
72 0 0 740
770
90
840
840
850
860
0 84
880
930
780
930
680
680
85
920
950
680
930
840
810
850
87
87
0
870
860
87
880
Jacob Ave.
900
800
880
790
87
850
830
810
820
840
780 750 810
0 81 820 0
830
81
81
890
830
820
800
810
830
820
800 820
830
83
830
81
78
830
84
840
820
820
820
820
820
820 82 0
830 830
83
840
0 83
0
790
82
82
V U
316
82 0
830 830
820
830
820
82
82
800
84
84
820
750
830
83
82
79
81
830
830
830
820
83
170th St. E.
770
830
830
820
830
830
83
V U
47
830
0 82
830
830
83
830
800
820
82
77
82
76
82
830
0 82
10
1 82 8 0
830
84
83
830
850
830
Nicolai Ave.
82
820
820
830
77
830
82
810 820
83
840
830
88
82
930
71
68
810
160th St. E.
810
10
820 0 82 0 81
79
83
820
830
V U
91
750
87
820
810
860
840
840
820
840
870
790 800
790
790
800 90
0 79
890
840
870
790
87
820
820
Glendale Road 77 840 0
790
870
850
0 878 6
790
880
900
790
87
870
90
890
870
850
870 860 860
W. 15th St.
800
800
760
69
850
82
79
89
800
900
79
800
79
87
810
780 291 720 750 830
V U
LeDuc Drive 750

860
R aven
n a Tra
il
680 690 680 690 700 690

730 860 860
680
89
93
900
890
860
800
0 68 0 71
680
68
6 0 80 69 0
68
890
860
88
880
830 850
V U
55
800
860
73
690
680
880
900 890
V U
55
91 0
Vermillion St.
860
940
900 92 0
710
960
900 870 850 89 0 900 880
780
940
680
920
900 89 0
830
82
790
87
900 920 910
880
85
72
680
920
950
900 90
780
70
91
910 94 0
V U
42
920
870
850
780
80
92 91 0 0
870 880
860
830
80
69
0 76 0 76 0 0 75 71 0 0 79 75 0 70 73 60 7 0 7 00 79 0 8 79
83
77
790
840
840
07
68
0
720
780
78
70
69
69 0
0
68 0
0 69 0 69
720 780 680
720 710
83 0
68 690
920
870
77
72
0
79 0
69
78
0 W. 2nd St. 69

61
680
910 W. 8th St.
820 790 82 83 0 0
90
780
0 780 780 770 78 0 770 770
73
74
700
690 690
80
680 0 68
680 690 680
700
680
680
68
0 680
680
700
690
71
690
680
72
73
0
70 0
74
0
790 750 78 68 0 7 0 60 68 77 6 0 8 0 0 69 0 68 0
680

Figure 6-1 Ultimate Sewer Districts Legend
Future MCES WWTP 2030 Sewer Service Area Boundary
89 0
760
710
69
70
69 0
80
680
850
780 770
75
890
i in
940
ng
85
er
0 810
830
820
830
830
82
820
820
820 820 820 820 820
830 830
840
820
840
830
83
820
840 840
840
820
82
82
10
81
82
800
82
820
820
820
830
80
0
80 0
800
820
840 0 4 8
840
84
820
840
82
820
40
830
830 830 830
830
830
82
820
82
790
810
810
820
820
790 800
770
780
83
83
83
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_6_1_Ultimate_Sewer_DistrictsA.mxd
86 0
85 0
85 0
850
870
950
R d.
70 0
78
84
0 92 0 95 0 93
900
680
910
68
680
69
780
680
680
870
68
680
70
860
780
690
680
700
680 680
80 0 6
68
84
70
680
860 0
680
82 0
760
680
900
84
840
85 0
880
870
680
680
870
87
700
91
870
78
830
860
880
83 0
870
860
0 0 7 40 690
69
860
88
SewerSheds
72 0
850
84
830
86
83
840
860
68
850
0 68
680
680
District
84
830
840
810
890
N NE NW S SC SE SW WC E ESE
820
82
810
75
20 0 8
830
780
680
820
680
830
82
83 0
830 830 820 840 850 850
830
79
810
83
830
830
730
830
790

61
81
760
850
83
830
830
77
830
82
810 0 82
83 0
80
78
81
0
840
820
820
830
81
820
790
81
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
810
84 0
800
820
820
830
83 0
82
820
790
820
82 0
790
82
810
82 0
81 0
780
810
81 0
810
82
82 0
81
82 0
LS 350 GPM CAPACITY
V U
42
LS 700 GPM CAPACITY
HWY 55 LS 1.97 MGD / 1,400 GPM CAPACITY
TREATMENT PLANT LS 1.44 MGD / 1,000 GPM CAPACITY

61 W. 2nd St.
HASTINGS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 5.0 MGD CAPACITY FUTURE EXPANSION TO 10.0 MGD CAPACITY

Figure 6-2 2030 Trunk System Layout & Sizes Legend
N i in ng er R d.
V U
55
W. 8th St.
Vermillion St.
18 INCH PARALLEL INTERCEPTOR
W. 15th St.
Jacob Ave.
V U
291
LeDuc Drive
R aven
n a Tra
il
Size 8" 12" 15" 18" 21" 24" 27" 30" 33"
Nicolai Ave.
V U
47
GENERAL SIEBEN DR. LS 6.35 MGD / 4,400 GPM CAPACITY
160th St. E.
V U
91
Glendale Road
36" 42" Forcemain Existing Sanitary Sewer Future MCES WWTP 2030 Sewer Service Area Boundary Sewer Districts

61 170th St. E.
V U
316
LS 230 GPM CAPACITY
0 0.3 0.6 Miles 1.2
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_6_2_2030_Trunk_System_Layout.mxd
V U
42
Ni ni ng er Rd .

61
Vermillion St.

Figure 6-3 Ultimate Trunk System Layout & Sizes
V U
55
Jacob Ave.
W. 8th St.
W. 15th St.
Text
V U
291
LeDuc Drive
R aven
n a Tra
il
Legend
Size 8" 10" 12" 15" 18" 21"
Nicolai Ave.
Glendale Road
Existing Sanitary Sewer Development Extents to Trigger Future Parallel Interceptor Construction Future MCES WWTP 2030 Sewer Service Area Boundary Sewer Districts
V U
160th St. E. 47
V U
91

61 170th St. E.
24" 27" 30" 36"
V U
316
LS 940 GPM CAPACITY
42" Forcemain
LS 3,700 GPM CAPACITY
LS 5,250 GPM CAPACITY
0 0.25 0.5 Miles 1
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_6_3_Ultimate_Trunk_System_Layout.mxd
LS 2025 - 2030
V U
42
LS 2025 - 2030 LS 2020 - 2025
Ni ni
ng
LS 2015 - 2020
er
Rd

Vermillion St.
61

Figure 7-1 2030 Trunk System Phasing Legend
NW
V U
55
W. 8th St.
W. 15th St. WC
Jacob Ave.
NE
V U
291 SC
LeDuc Drive
R aven
n a Tra
il
Phase 2010 - 2015 2015 - 2020 2020 - 2025
Glendale Road
2025 - 2030 Future MCES WWTP 2030 Sewer Service Area Boundary Sewer Districts
LS 2010 - 2015
V U
47
160th St. E.
SE SW S
V U
91
Nicolai Ave.

170th St. E.
LS 2025 - 2030
61
V U
316
0 0.25 0.5 Miles 1
K:\01784-00\GIS\Maps\Report Figures\Fig_7_1_2030_Trunk_System_Phasing.mxd

10 Waste Water

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

10 Waste Water

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 10 - Hastings 2030 Comprehensive Plan

COMPREHENSIVE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PLAN

Infrastructure Engineering Planning Construction

Joseph C. Ward, PE Project Engineer Enclosure lh/srb

Joseph C. Ward, PE Date: November 4, 2008 Lic. No. 45855

Quality Control Review by:

Kevin F. Newman, PE Date: November 4, 2008 Lic. No. 25198

Quality Control Review by:

David E. Hutton, PE Date: November 4, 2008 Lic. No. 19133

FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM..........................................................................20 6.1 6.2

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

Appendix 1 MCES Peaking Factors Appendix 2 Development Phase Cost Estimates

PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Acres 16 46 170 2,284 126 10 123 2,775

Projected Non-Residential Growth

Projected Land Use Phasing and Summary

Table 4-2 Potential Service Area

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM

Existing Wastewater Flows

Table 5-1 M602 Historical Wastewater Flow

2007 Average Day Flow (GPM) 32 4 147 6 34 17 0 6

2006 Average Day Flow (GPM) 32 2 148 6 34 17 0 9

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

1.617 1.607 1.591 1.572 1.556

Evaluation of Existing Facilities

Table 5-8 Existing Lift Station Capacities and Flows

FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM

Future Wastewater Flows

Table 6-1 Summary of 2030 Gross Developable Acres by Sewer District1

255 1,040 447 342 200

360 1,318 448 342

Total Future Flow

Total Future Flow

Future Trunk Sanitary Sewer System

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (CIP)

APPENDIX 1 MCES Peaking Factors

K:\01784-00\Water - Wastewater\Excel\Flow\Report tables.xlsAppx 1

APPENDIX 2 Development Phase Cost Estimates

Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan

Estimated Total Quantity

Estimated Unit Price

Estimated Total Cost

Engr/Legal 20% TOTAL

K:\01784-00\Water - Wastewater\Excel\Cost\Cost estimates2010-2015

Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan

Estimated Total Quantity

Estimated Unit Price

Estimated Total Cost

Engr/Legal 20% TOTAL

K:\01784-00\Water - Wastewater\Excel\Cost\Cost estimates2015-2020

Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan

Estimated Total Quantity

Estimated Unit Price

Estimated Total Cost

Engr/Legal 20% TOTAL

K:\01784-00\Water - Wastewater\Excel\Cost\Cost estimates2020-2025

Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan

Estimated Total Quantity

Estimated Unit Price

Estimated Total Cost

Engr/Legal 20% TOTAL

K:\01784-00\Water - Wastewater\Excel\Cost\Cost estimates2025-2030

City of Hastings Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan