Essay #3 Critique Essay

Eng 102BC

Directions: Choose a controversial topic that can later be developed into an argument. Find a scholarly article to support your position. Read this article and write a critique. The essays introduction must identify the article title and author, provide background information, and include a thesis statement that is specific. The essay summarizes the author s purpose for writing and the main points of the passage. The summary is brief, complete, objective, and avoids plagiarism. The essay must include an assessment of the authors presentation of the topic by commenting on the authors success in achieving his/her purpose by reviewing 3 or 4 specific points. A personal response to the presentation must be included in the essay. Components include a response to the authors views and a discussion of reasons for agreement and/or disagreement. The conclusion discusses the overall validity of the article, assesses authors success at achieving aims, mentions personal reactions to authors views, and restates the thesis by mentioning the weaknesses/strengths of passage. Grammar and mechanics will also be graded for accuracy. Particular attention will be given to topics already covered in class. Evidence of each stage of the writing process must be submitted: prewrite (1 sentence summaries, thesis); planning (outline); drafting; revising (peer review form); and publishing (final copy). MLA format must be followed and include a works cited page. The target length is 3-4 pages. This total does not include the works cited page. A 14 pts. B 12 pts. C 11 pts. D 9 pts. F 8 pts. All 1 characteristic 2 characteristics 3 characteristics 4 characteristics Introduction characteristics is weak or are weak or are weak or are weak or apparent missing missing missing missing Summary All characteristics apparent All characteristics apparent All characteristics apparent All characteristics apparent A 20 pts. less than 2 errors in grammar or mechanics A 10 pts. All parts are submitted. Final copy follows MLA format. 1 characteristic is weak or missing 1 characteristic is weak or missing 1 characteristic is weak or missing 1 characteristic is weak or missing B 17 pts. 3-4 errors in grammar and mechanics B 8 pts. 1 component is missing from writing process or MLA format. 2 characteristics are weak or missing 2 characteristics are weak or missing 2 characteristics are weak or missing 2 characteristics are weak or missing C 15 pts. 5-6 errors in grammar and mechanics C 7 pts. 2 components are missing from writing process or MLA format. 3 characteristics are weak or missing 3 characteristics are weak or missing 3 characteristics are weak or missing 3 characteristics are weak or missing D 13 pts. 7-8 errors in grammar and mechanics D 6 pts. 3 components are missing from writing process or MLA format. 4 characteristics are weak or missing 4 characteristics are weak or missing 4 characteristics are weak or missing 4 characteristics are weak or missing F 11 pts. 9 or more errors in grammar and mechanics F 5 pts. 4 or more components are missing from writing process or MLA format.

Assessment of Presentation

Response to Presentation

Conclusion

Grammar & Mechanics

Writing process; MLA format; target length

EARNED:

100 Points Total

Essay #3

Eng 102BC

INTRODUCTION 1. What is the article title and author? 2. What background information is given? According to the writer, why is the subject of current interest? According to the writer, how or why is the subject of the passage controversial? According to the writer, what is the authors background? According to the writer, under what circumstances was the original passage written? 3. What is the writers thesis statement? SUMMARY 1. What main points does the writer summarize? 2. What does the writer say is the purpose for the writing? 3. Is the writers summary brief, complete, objective, and does it avoid plagiarism? ASSESSMENT OF PRESENTATION 1. What does the writer say about the authors success in achieving his/her purpose? What does the writer say about the accuracy of the information? What does the writer say about the significance of the information? What does the writer say about the authors term definition? What does the writer say about how the author used and interpreted the information? Was it done fairly? Was it argued logically? PERSONAL RESPONSE TO THE PRESENTATION 1. How does the writer respond to the authors views? 2. What reasons does the writer give for agreeing or disagreeing with the author? Which views does the writer agree with? Why? Which views does the writer disagree with? Why? CONCLUSION 1. What does the writer say about the overall validity of the article? 2. What does the writer say about the authors success at achieving his/her aims? 3. What does the writer say about his/her personal reactions? 4. How does the writer restate the thesis and mention the weaknesses/strengths of passage?