69 views

Uploaded by ksheikh777

yield strength

- Joh+Goto_2000_Beam-column joint behaviour after beam yielding in RC ductile frames
- Failure
- FEA LASER WELDS
- Mech-Intro 13.0 WS05.1 LinStruc
- 46. Deformation mechanism transitions in nanoscale fcc metals.pdf
- 14 Chapter 5
- Lesson2_Materialtesting
- spmp
- 06 Mechanical 08
- SDOF plastic
- Ch_17_Plastic_2013
- 01. a Summary of Essential Differences Between EC2 and BS8110 Code (2014 10 07)
- Lecture 1
- IS 1786 2008 - TMT bar
- Applied Metallurgy
- eq
- Apendices Ruaumoko
- welcometothepresentationon-131127120041-phpapp01
- XII-Paper-05.pdf
- InTech-Non_linear_design_evaluation_of_class_1_3_nuclear_power_piping.pdf

You are on page 1of 9

v t e

Buckling Corrosion Corrosion fatigue Creep Fatigue Fouling Fracture Hydrogen embrittlement Impact Mechanical overload Stress corrosion cracking Thermal shock Wear Yielding

A yield strength or yield point of a material is defined in engineering and materials science as the stress at which a material begins to deform plastically. Prior to the yield point the material will deform elastically and will return to its original shape when the applied stress is removed. Once the yield point is passed, some fraction of the deformation will be permanent and nonreversible. In the three-dimensional space of the principal stresses ( ), an infinite number of yield points form together a yield surface.

Knowledge of the yield point is vital when designing a component since it generally represents an upper limit to the load that can be applied. It is also important for the control of many materials production techniques such as forging, rolling, or pressing. In structural engineering, this is a soft failure mode which does not normally cause catastrophic failure or ultimate failure unless it accelerates buckling.

Contents

[hide]

1 Definition 2 Yield criterion o 2.1 Isotropic yield criteria o 2.2 Anisotropic yield criteria 3 Factors influencing yield stress o 3.1 Strengthening mechanisms 3.1.1 Work hardening 3.1.2 Solid solution strengthening 3.1.3 Particle/Precipitate strengthening 3.1.4 Grain boundary strengthening 4 Testing 5 Implications for structural engineering 6 Typical yield and ultimate strengths 7 See also 8 References o 8.1 Notes o 8.2 Bibliography

Definition[edit]

2: Proportionality limit 3: Elastic limit 4: Offset yield strength It is often difficult to precisely define yielding due to the wide variety of stressstrain curves exhibited by real materials. In addition, there are several possible ways to define yielding:[1] True elastic limit The lowest stress at which dislocations move. This definition is rarely used, since dislocations move at very low stresses, and detecting such movement is very difficult. Proportionality limit Up to this amount of stress, stress is proportional to strain (Hooke's law), so the stressstrain graph is a straight line, and the gradient will be equal to the elastic modulus of the material. Elastic limit (yield strength) Beyond the elastic limit, permanent deformation will occur. The lowest stress at which permanent deformation can be measured. This requires a manual load-unload procedure, and the accuracy is critically dependent on equipment and operator skill. For elastomers, such as rubber, the elastic limit is much larger than the proportionality limit. Also, precise strain measurements have shown that plastic strain begins at low stresses.[2][3] Yield point The point in the stress-strain curve at which the curve levels off and plastic deformation begins to occur.[4] Offset yield point (proof stress) When a yield point is not easily defined based on the shape of the stress-strain curve an offset yield point is arbitrarily defined. The value for this is commonly set at 0.1 or 0.2% strain.[5] The offset value is given as a subscript, e.g., Rp0.2=310 MPa.[citation needed] High strength steel and aluminum alloys do not exhibit a yield point, so this offset yield point is used on these materials.[5] Upper yield point and lower yield point Some metals, such as mild steel, reach an upper yield point before dropping rapidly to a lower yield point. The material response is linear up until the upper yield point, but the lower yield point is used in structural engineering as a conservative value. If a metal is only stressed to the upper yield point, and beyond, Lders bands can develop.[6]

Yield criterion[edit]

This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2013) A yield criterion, often expressed as yield surface, or yield locus, is a hypothesis concerning the limit of elasticity under any combination of stresses. There are two interpretations of yield criterion: one is purely mathematical in taking a statistical approach while other models attempt to provide a justification based on established physical principles. Since stress and strain are

tensor qualities they can be described on the basis of three principal directions, in the case of stress these are denoted by , , and . The following represent the most common yield criterion as applied to an isotropic material (uniform properties in all directions). Other equations have been proposed or are used in specialist situations.

Maximum Principal Stress Theory by W.J.M Rankine(1850). Yield occurs when the largest principal stress exceeds the uniaxial tensile yield strength. Although this criterion allows for a quick and easy comparison with experimental data it is rarely suitable for design purposes. This theory gives good predictions for brittle materials.

Maximum Principal Strain Theory by St.Venant. Yield occurs when the maximum principal strain reaches the strain corresponding to the yield point during a simple tensile test. In terms of the principal stresses this is determined by the equation:

Maximum Shear Stress Theory Also known as the Tresca yield criterion, after the French scientist Henri Tresca. This assumes that yield occurs when the shear stress exceeds the shear yield strength :

Total Strain Energy Theory This theory assumes that the stored energy associated with elastic deformation at the point of yield is independent of the specific stress tensor. Thus yield occurs when the strain energy per unit volume is greater than the strain energy at the elastic limit in simple tension. For a 3-dimensional stress state this is given by:

Distortion Energy Theory This theory proposes that the total strain energy can be separated into two components: the volumetric (hydrostatic) strain energy and the shape (distortion or shear) strain energy. It is proposed that yield occurs when the distortion component exceeds that at the yield point for a simple tensile test. Based on a different theoretical underpinning this expression is also referred to as octahedral shear stress theory.[citation needed] Other commonly used isotropic yield criteria are the

Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion Drucker-Prager yield criterion Bresler-Pister yield criterion Willam-Warnke yield criterion

The yield surfaces corresponding to these criteria have a range of forms. However, most isotropic yield criteria correspond to convex yield surfaces.

When a metal is subjected to large plastic deformations the grain sizes and orientations change in the direction of deformation. As a result the plastic yield behavior of the material shows directional dependency. Under such circumstances, the isotropic yield criteria such as the von Mises yield criterion are unable to predict the yield behavior accurately. Several anisotropic yield criteria have been developed to deal with such situations. Some of the more popular anisotropic yield criteria are:

Hill's quadratic yield criterion. Generalized Hill yield criterion. Hosford yield criterion.

This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2013) The stress at which yield occurs is dependent on both the rate of deformation (strain rate) and, more significantly, the temperature at which the deformation occurs. In general, the yield strength increases with strain rate and decreases with temperature. When the latter is not the case, the material is said to exhibit yield strength anomaly, which is typical for superalloys and leads to their use in applications requiring high strength at high temperatures. Early work by Alder and Philips in 1954 found that the relationship between yield stress and strain rate (at constant temperature) was best described by a power law relationship of the form

where C is a constant and m is the strain rate sensitivity. The latter generally increases with temperature, and materials where m reaches a value greater than ~0.5 tend to exhibit super plastic behaviour. Later, more complex equations were proposed that simultaneously dealt with both temperature and strain rate:

where and A are constants and Z is the temperature-compensated strain-rate often described by the Zener-Hollomon parameter:

where QHW is the activation energy for hot deformation and T is the absolute temperature.

Strengthening mechanisms[edit]

There are several ways in which crystalline and amorphous materials can be engineered to increase their yield strength. By altering dislocation density, impurity levels, grain size (in crystalline materials), the yield strength of the material can be fine tuned. This occurs typically by introducing defects such as impurities dislocations in the material. To move this defect (plastically deforming or yielding the material), a larger stress must be applied. This thus causes a higher yield stress in the material. While many material properties depend only on the composition of the bulk material, yield strength is extremely sensitive to the materials processing as well for this reason. These mechanisms for crystalline materials include

Work hardening Solid solution strengthening Precipitation strengthening Grain boundary strengthening

Work hardening[edit] Where deforming the material will introduce dislocations, which increases their density in the material. This increases the yield strength of the material, since now more stress must be applied to move these dislocations through a crystal lattice. Dislocations can also interact with each other, becoming entangled. The governing formula for this mechanism is:

where is the yield stress, G is the shear elastic modulus, b is the magnitude of the Burgers vector, and is the dislocation density. Solid solution strengthening[edit]

By alloying the material, impurity atoms in low concentrations will occupy a lattice position directly below a dislocation, such as directly below an extra half plane defect. This relieves a tensile strain directly below the dislocation by filling that empty lattice space with the impurity atom. The relationship of this mechanism goes as:

where is the shear stress, related to the yield stress, G and b are the same as in the above example, C_s is the concentration of solute and is the strain induced in the lattice due to adding the impurity. Particle/Precipitate strengthening[edit] Where the presence of a secondary phase will increase yield strength by blocking the motion of dislocations within the crystal. A line defect that, while moving through the matrix, will be forced against a small particle or precipitate of the material. Dislocations can move through this particle either by shearing the particle, or by a process known as bowing or ringing, in which a new ring of dislocations is created around the particle. The shearing formula goes as:

In these formulas, is the particle radius, is the surface tension between the matrix and the particle, is the distance between the particles. Grain boundary strengthening[edit] Where a buildup of dislocations at a grain boundary causes a repulsive force between dislocations. As grain size decreases, the surface area to volume ratio of the grain increases, allowing more buildup of dislocations at the grain edge. Since it requires a lot of energy to move dislocations to another grain, these dislocations build up along the boundary, and increase the yield stress of the material. Also known as Hall-Petch strengthening, this type of strengthening is governed by the formula:

where is the stress required to move dislocations, k is a material constant, and d is the grain size.

Testing[edit]

Yield strength testing involves taking a small sample with a fixed cross-section area, and then pulling it with a controlled, gradually increasing force until the sample changes shape or breaks. Longitudinal and/or transverse strain is recorded using mechanical or optical extensometers. Indentation hardness correlates linearly with tensile strength for most steels.[7] Hardness testing can therefore be an economical substitute for tensile testing, as well as providing local variations in yield strength due to e.g. welding or forming operations.

Yielded structures have a lower stiffness, leading to increased deflections and decreased buckling strength. The structure will be permanently deformed when the load is removed, and may have residual stresses. Engineering metals display strain hardening, which implies that the yield stress is increased after unloading from a yield state. Highly optimized structures, such as airplane beams and components, rely on yielding as a fail-safe failure mode. No safety factor is therefore needed when comparing limit loads (the highest loads expected during normal operation) to yield criteria.[citation needed]

Note: many of the values depend on manufacturing process and purity/composition. Yield strength (MPa) 250 448 690 1650 Ultimate strength (MPa) 400 531 760 1860 22002482 5650 2633 1243 37 19.780

[10] [9]

[8]

Density (g/cm) 7.85 7.85 7.85 7.85 7.8 1.75 0.95 0.91

free breaking length (km) 3.2 5.8 9.0 21.6 28.7 2.8 1.3

Steel, high strength alloy ASTM A514 Steel, prestressing strands Piano wire Carbon Fiber (CF, CFK) High density polyethylene (HDPE) Polypropylene

Material Stainless steel AISI 302 Coldrolled Cast iron 4.5% C, ASTM A-48[11] Titanium alloy (6% Al, 4% V) Aluminium alloy 2014-T6 Copper 99.9% Cu Cupronickel 10% Ni, 1.6% Fe, 1% Mn, balance Cu Brass Spider silk Silkworm silk Aramid (Kevlar or Twaron) UHMWPE

[12][13]

Density (g/cm)

[14]

1400

0.97

*

130

Grey cast iron does not have a well defined yield strength because the stress-strain relationship is atypical. The yield strength can vary from 65 to 80% of the tensile strength.[15] Elements in the annealed state[16] Young's modulus Proof or yield stress Ultimate Tensile Strength (GPa) (MPa) (MPa) Aluminium 70 1520 4050 Copper Iron Nickel Silicon Tantalum Tin Titanium Tungsten 130 211 170 107 186 47 120 411 33 80100 1435 50009000 180 914 100225 550 200 15200 240370 550620 210 350 140195

- Joh+Goto_2000_Beam-column joint behaviour after beam yielding in RC ductile framesUploaded byArbi811
- FailureUploaded byLalit Baviskar
- FEA LASER WELDSUploaded bymecer
- Mech-Intro 13.0 WS05.1 LinStrucUploaded byArturo Pomiano
- 46. Deformation mechanism transitions in nanoscale fcc metals.pdfUploaded byCamilo De la Rans
- 14 Chapter 5Uploaded bySebastiao Silva
- Lesson2_MaterialtestingUploaded byعبداللهأحمد
- spmpUploaded byBharat Kumar
- 06 Mechanical 08Uploaded bygosaye desalegn
- SDOF plasticUploaded byvaram1
- Ch_17_Plastic_2013Uploaded byTouch
- 01. a Summary of Essential Differences Between EC2 and BS8110 Code (2014 10 07)Uploaded bytun20000
- Lecture 1Uploaded byZulfadzli Ridzuan
- IS 1786 2008 - TMT barUploaded byananda_beloshe75
- Applied MetallurgyUploaded byMauricio Guzman
- eqUploaded byvkool8888
- Apendices RuaumokoUploaded bybianca
- welcometothepresentationon-131127120041-phpapp01Uploaded byMuhammadIqbalMughal
- XII-Paper-05.pdfUploaded bynehalahmad25@gmail.com
- InTech-Non_linear_design_evaluation_of_class_1_3_nuclear_power_piping.pdfUploaded byktsnl
- Ch9 ElasticityUploaded byDanya Gutierrez
- Wang 2016Uploaded byIlham Ary Wahyudie
- 43-279-1-PB.pdfUploaded byDurukan Tamkan
- ansys analysis of 2d trussUploaded byashesh pokhrel
- 2D FE Simulation of Material Flow in the FSW ProcessUploaded byJoe Tahir
- FEMA 355A State of the Art Report on Base Metals and Fracture.pdfUploaded bySankar Cdm
- paperUploaded byJing Cao
- Torsion Final ReportUploaded byHanis Farina
- Week No.1Uploaded byShamsUlislam
- engr2026_dec10Uploaded byMohamed Alqaisi

- FordismUploaded byksheikh777
- Rsm Part1 IntroUploaded byksheikh777
- Guidlines by UGC for Minor ProjectUploaded byRahul Pratap Singh Kaurav
- Call for PapersUploaded byksheikh777
- Skill IndiaUploaded byksheikh777
- 05 Nlsiu MumbaiUploaded byksheikh777
- Himayat Placement Linked Skill Development in Jammu and KashmirUploaded byksheikh777
- 9 - Phase DiagramsUploaded bywawawa1
- Poisson's RatioUploaded byksheikh777
- resilenceUploaded byksheikh777
- Coefficient of RestitutionUploaded byksheikh777
- virali stressUploaded byksheikh777
- properties of materialsUploaded byksheikh777
- Ultimate Tensile StrengthUploaded byksheikh777
- Mal PracUploaded byksheikh777
- Timoshenko Beam TheoryUploaded byksheikh777

- Fluid Mechanics by Chun-Liang LaiUploaded by李侑澄
- Ralph Ellison’s “Invisible Man” – Lesson Plan _ Lesson Plan _ PBS NewsHour ExtraUploaded byCameron
- Groeschell_CIS 109 SyllabusUploaded byosalazardebreaux
- Mahony v. Pickus, CUMcv-04-141 (Cumberland Super. Ct., 2008)Uploaded byChris Buck
- HashingUploaded bygoyaltarun
- Residual Stress Fatigue and ReliabilityUploaded byDhatchina Moorthy
- Broshures Phywe Tess Phy 2010Uploaded byDenis PA
- Lop Logic in SEL-751AUploaded bysimhachalams
- 5 Dewi Genital HerpesUploaded bySa'adah Munawaroh HD
- Analisa Mekanik Al JazariUploaded bySalman Alfarisi
- ChaRM-CSOL and Incident_Change_Tobias Hauk.pdfUploaded bykishore
- Lupin 2qfy2013ruUploaded byAngel Broking
- MamUploaded byHawayana Gonzalez
- Algebra 1X Notes v3aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaUploaded bybbteenager
- Partnerships- General ProvisionsUploaded bybazinguh
- Kilcommon Graveyard DatabaseUploaded bySt. John's Parish Heritage Group.
- Stick and Poke TattooUploaded byRenuka Patra
- 201805 FHSC1014 Mechanics Tutorial 6 S (1)Uploaded bySteve Thaw
- EllenMillerFINRACommentUploaded bySunlight Foundation
- The Premortem TechniqueUploaded byConnochaetesTaurinus
- ICICI Bank - ProjectUploaded byTejasvi Katira
- principleUploaded byFarouqAffero
- CpmUploaded byJhai-ki-Chan
- Combating of Domestic Violence Act 4 of 2003Uploaded byAndré Le Roux
- Learning Resource- Sample Client Advice LetterUploaded bySerhat Ipek
- HOWTO Install CM93ed3 Windows7UKUploaded byflyinggecko
- UNIT_1Uploaded byrudra_mazumdar
- AvoidanceUploaded byLaís Dantas de Araújo
- ethics-autonomy and health syllabus sp14 lggUploaded byapi-244012593
- Between Mind and Nature a History of PsychologyUploaded byBurak Dogruoz