International Peace and Security

SURVEY ANALYSIS: Perception on Security based

on College Students of St. Paul University and
Miriam College

Presented to: Ms. Jasmine Galace

Submitted by:
Ma. Elise Cipriano
Rona Alquiza Ysais
October 13, 2009
Introduction

There are many issues and challenges that surround the concept of security during
armed conflict and peacetime. These issues and challenges are brought about
transformation in the context of development, whereas before civilians are
protected and excluded, are now being the target of attack in different conflicts;
also they are the ones that are widely affected of the deterioration of one country’s
progression. More so, the emergence of new technology increased arms
proliferation and the creation of sophisticated arms that is able to kill a lot of people
became widespread. Having said these challenges with our constituting factors in
political, economic and social aspects, nation-states are striving to protect their own
sovereignty, territory, peoples and national interests as well as promote peace and
provide security amongst people in the world.

In order to determine the awareness of selected individual with all the issues and
challenges we faced, a survey was conducted. A 30 item Likert-type scale was
designed to measure the perceptions of individuals on security. Statements
concerning security, where divided into three factors: political; economic; and
social, whereas each factor is composed of 10 statements. Ms. Edith dela Cruz of
the Guidance office from Miriam College was asked to validate the statements
before conducting the survey. The statements were well founded; however she
suggested formulating statements that are negatives and positives in order to fully
determine the consciousness of individuals.

The respondent of the survey were composed of 20 college students. On the basis
of availability, the first set of 10 college students were conducted in St. Paul
University, Quezon City. These college students were taking Hotel and Restaurant
Management. The second set of 10 was conducted in Miriam College, Quezon City,
which students are from the Department of Communication Arts. The subject
chosen for the experiment are similar in the following characteristics year level, age
and gender. The purpose of having two set of 10’s, is to see the comparison of
these college students on how well the institutions they belong makes them aware
of the issues beyond their courses.
Results

All college students who participated in the experiment completed the survey. Due
to the existence of a range of understanding the issues on security, every question
could not necessarily be answered, however, most of the questions were answered.
Replies to the questionnaire provided a very good level of detail.

Provided below are three different figures that shows the result of the survey
conducted in ST. Paul University. Every color represents a statement and the
percentile labeled in each color signifies the highest selected concept of security.
Below each graph statements that are positives and negatives where put together
in order to make the analyzation easier.

POLITICAL

PQ1
30% 30%
50% 50% PQ2
PQ3
40% 30%
PQ4
40% PQ5
50% PQ6

60% PQ7
50%
PQ8
PQ9
PQ10

Figure 1: Perception of Security in Political Means.

In the political concept of Security, 50% of the respondents agree to equal

distribution of political power to the people as one way of making a secured society.
60% strongly agree that the presence of terrorism means the existence of
causalities, death, violation and destruction. 50% agree that by addressing the root
cause or breeding ground of the conflict is a way in stopping the cycle of conflict.
50% agree that traditional responses, such as military intervention and economic
embargo are the effective ways of resolving the conflict; while the other 50% agree
to humanitarian responses, such as diplomatic negotiation, can also resolve a
conflict.

30% disagree with the idea of having one leader to take all responsibility for the
whole world. 30% disagree that security means having no good governance.
According to the 40% of the respondents that they strongly agree that strict
implementation of rules and regulations is not needed in order to systematize the
world. 30$ disagree to the idea of military security having excluded the protection
of civilian from rebel attacks. Lastly, 40% agree that intervention of third party
actors in conflict is not helpful or not important in de-escalation of conflict between
the belligerent parties.

ECONOMIC

EQ1
40% 50%
50% EQ2
50%
EQ3
30%
60% EQ4
50% EQ5
EQ6
50%
50%
EQ7
50%
EQ8
EQ9
EQ10

Figure 2: Highest percentile per number in the category of ECONOMIC

60% agree that international institution play a significant role in maintaining

security among the traders in the market. 50% strongly agree that there should be
a proper maximization of resources so that there would be a peaceful society. 50%
agree that the continuous production of weapons by private companies should be
address to the proliferation of arms that causes the escalation of conflict. While 50%
strongly agree that the unlawful use of national funds can trigger a conflict. 40%
agree that good banking interest rates, saving plans, elastic loans and credit
assistance will not lead to another bubble burst like the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis.

50% strongly disagree that economic security is not part of the national security.
50% strongly disagree that the globalization of economy can guarantee the
protection of the market because 50% says they agree that economic resources are
often caused of conflict. 50% agree that resources need not to be distributed
accordingly to have order and organization among the people and 30% agree that
legal limit on the quantity of good that may be imported cannot secure the local
production of goods.

SOCIAL
SQ1
50% 30%
60% SQ2
50%
SQ3

50% 60% SQ4

SQ5

40% SQ6
50%
SQ7
30% 50%
SQ8
SQ9
SQ10

Figure 3: Highest percentile per number in the category of SOCIAL

30% agree that security is freedom from wants. 60% strongly agree that fair
education should be afforded to everyone. Again 60% strongly agree that there
should be no gender bias on politics and religion. 50% agree that a healthy lifestyle
and absence of malnutrition is a means of security. Also 50% agree that
environmental protection is needed to have a secured world.

50% strongly disagree that violations of human rights need not to be addressed,
because 50% agree that inequality among the people often becomes the trigging
factor in conflict outburst. 40% strongly disagree that there should be no freedom in
religious affiliation and political belief, while 50% are undecided with the notion of
existence of ethnic discrimination in a secured worlds. Lastly, 30% disagree that the
use and recruitment of children in armed conflict is useful in resolving the chaos.

The succeeding graph shows the result of the survey conducted in Miriam College.

Political
1st Question
80% 50% 2nd Question
40%
50% 3rd Question
80% 4th Question
60%
5th Question
70% 50%
60% 50% 6th Question
7th Question
8th Question
9th Question

Figure 1.Perception of security through Political

perspective

For their perception of security in a political aspect, 80% remained neither

agreeable nor disagreeable to having hegemon to take responsibility over
everything in the whole world. Meanwhile, 50% also stayed impartial on having
equally distributed political authority to the people to ensure a secured society. 50%
are neither agreeable nor disagreeable to having humanitarian response, which is in
the light of diplomatic negotiation as a resolution to conflicts. Correspondingly, 80%
also remained neutral in believing that having the intervention of third party actors
isn’t important or helpful in de-escalating conflicts between belligerent parties. 40%
of the respondents are also undecided between agreeing and disagreeing in
security as a protection from rebel attacks.

50% of the respondents strongly disagreed on security dependent on good

governance. 60% of them also strongly oppose the systematizing of the world
through strict implementation of rules and regulations. Strangely, 70% of the
respondents disagreed on the absence of terrorism as congruent to absence of
casualties, death, violations and destructions. 60% of these students also disagreed
on having traditional responses such as military intervention and economic
embargoes as effective ways of resolving conflicts.

50% of the respondents agreed that stopping the cycle of conflict is through
addressing the root or the breeding ground of conflict.

Economic
1st Question
70% 40%
80% 2nd Question
80%
3rd Question
50%
4th Question
70% 40% 5th Question
40% 40%
40% 6th Question
7th Question
8th Question

Figure 2.Perception of security through Economic

perspective
40% of the students are undecided if economic security is national security. They
also stayed neutral on looking at economic globalization as making the trading of
the market more secured. Disproportioned distribution of resources accordingly
gained a neither agreeable nor disagreeable response from 40% of the students.
70% of the respondents cannot decide if amenable or not on if legal limit on the
quantity of goods that may be imported cannot secure the local production of
goods. Another 70% also is neither agreeable nor disagreeable if good banking
interest rates, saving plans, elastic loans and credit assistance will not lead to
another bubble burst like the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis.

Meanwhile, 40% of the respondents strongly agreed that economic resources often
cause conflicts. An astounding 80% also strongly affirmed that unlawful use of
national funds can trigger a conflict.

50% of the respondents agreed that international institutions give significant

contributions in maintaining security among traders. 40% also agreed that proper
maximization of resources leads to a peaceful society. Another 40% also agreed
that continuous production of weapons by private companies should be addressed
to stop the proliferation of arms that causes the escalation of conflicts.

Social
1st Question
40% 30% 70%
2nd Question
50% 80%
3rd Question
90% 4th Question
60%
5th Question
30%
100% 6th Question
80%
7th Question
8th Question
9th Question

Figure 3.Perception of security through Social perspective

70% of the students are undecided on security as freedom from wants. 30% also
cannot decide on agreeing or disagreeing if there should be no freedom in religious
affiliation and political belief. 30% also stayed neutral if environmental protection is
world security.
80% of the respondents strongly affirmed that fair education should be afforded to
everyone. 60% also highly regarded that gender bias is unnecessary on politics and
religion. 50% of the respondents strongly concur that inequality among the people
often becomes the trigging factor in conflict outburst. Another portion of 30% also
strongly agreed on environmental protection as world security.

Another fraction of non-freedom in religious affiliation and political belief strongly

disagreed and it garnered 30%. 80% of them also highly declined the existence of
ethnic discrimination as to secure a society. All of them or 100% strongly oppose
the use and recruitment of children in armed conflict to resolve the chaos. And
another 90% strongly disagree on not addressing violations of human rights.
50% of the respondents agree that inequality among the people often becomes the
trigging factor in conflict outburst.

30% of the students disagree fractionally on absence of gender bias on politics and
religion. 40% also disagreed that healthy lifestyle and absence of malnutrition
means security.

Analysis

The Constitution of the International Labor Organization was written almost a

century ago, and it states that peace is impossible without social justice. The United
Nations Charter of 1945 mentions development as a means to have peace. In the
United Nations resolution on the first decade for development and in the United
Nations Declaration of 1969 on social progress, one finds the idea of
interdependency between nations alongside peace and security. The more recent
agenda for development, clearly states that we cannot attain development in the
absence of peace and security.

Before, the concept of security is linked with the military power of state, but as the
world witnessed the horrifying consequences of wars such as the two World Wars,
security has been modified and includes the human security.

In the political factor, A hegemon or one leader to take on the responsibility for
the whole world could not guarantee a secured world. Sometimes, leaders take
advantage on their power and use it for the good of his/her own interest and not for
anyone else sake. Equal distribution of political power is needed. Moreover, having
good governance is considerably necessary for a secured society. Strict
implementation of rules and regulations alone is not enough to systematize the
world; people from different classes should abide and be supportive. A sustained
participation of people in putting the laws to action is important. To address the
issues and challenges of this world, the ideas and perspective of people should also
be accounted in decision making, cooperation is essential.

Terrorism is coined as a tactic and strategy of armed groups. It is a means of

carrying unlawful violence to inculcate fear. Through such actions, it escalates the
tension of war and causes widespread casualties, death and violations. By
addressing the root cause or breeding ground of the conflict is a way of stopping
the cycle of conflict. Third Party Actors in the conflict play a significant role however
its intervention may not always result in favorable outcome, it would depend on the
strategy that it will use as a response in the conflict. The counter terrorism enacted
by states is equally alarming since it does not also recognize the inviolability of
civilians and thus perform attacks that are similar to the terrorist. More so, military
intervention and economic embargo as an example of the traditional response in
conflict cannot assure the de-escalation of conflict; however it could cause more
hatred and anger to people who are being deprived in the situation, such as the
civilians. In this response, the intervening actors are just conceiving another set of
individuals that in the future could become a terrorist of their generation. A
diplomatic negotiation as humanitarian response is seen as a more non-violent and
more peaceful way of negotiating in de-escalation of conflict.

In the Economic Factor, Economic security is part of the national security. The
government needs to make the most of its national fund. It should not be exploited
because it can cause a conflict outburst. Further, it needs to assure its people by at
least providing good banking interest rates, saving plans, elastic loans and credit
assistance will not lead to another bubble burst like the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis.

The globalization of economy cannot guarantee the protection of the market. With
that, International Institution such as World Trade Organization, International Labor
Organization and so on, plays a significant role in looking after new trends in market
trading. It also acts a mediator among the traders. Also, it somehow regulates the
maximization of scarce resources among the individual of society.

Likewise by having treaty, it would somehow lessen, or facing the reality will put the
production of arms under the table. Indeed, what needs to be address is the private
company that continually produces weapons. The availability and abused of small
weapons as well as the light weapons are central to new insecurity complex. These
weapons are perceived by many people to constitute a challenge to the protection
of core human rights as well as the realization of human security. The misuse of
these weapons by a range of different actors leads to a profound impact on
civilians.

In Social Factor, In 1948 the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was

established. It is a non-binding declaration adopted by the United Nations General
Assembly. It is a partly, response to the atrocities of the World War. Further, it is
considered to be a central component of international customary law which may be
invoked under appropriate circumstances by the national or other judiciaries. It also
urges member nations to promote various human, civil, economic and social rights.
Asserting these rights is part of the “foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the
world.”

Individuals, in line with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, have the right to
self-development. Children should not be use and recruited in armed conflict. The
government needs to address this issue in order to give these children a chance to
develop their well being. Therefore, fair education should be afforded to everyone. It
does not only focus on mental learning however education makes an individual in
becoming a well being. Further, a healthy lifestyle is a means for individual. Shelter,
food and clothes are the top of the line needed by individuals. For them to be able
to afford these stuffs, they need to earn money. It’s a domino effect actually, ones
an individual become educated he will then be lucky to seek for a job that will help
him/her to earn money and be able to afford what he/she needs.
Gender should not be considers as an issue that will impede an individual to
become developed. Everyone should be given chances accordingly on politics and
religion. They have their freedom to choose what they want and what they want to
believe in as long as it does not cause violation to the rights of the others.

Like human, environment has rights too. Individual should not be callous in its
surroundings, because what happens to environment may affect us. For instance,
because of deterioration of the forest, flood is unstoppable. Whatever destruction
you may cause to the environment sooner or later it will ask you to pay back and
suffer.

It is the respect for each and every one, as well as to the environment, that is
essential in attaining the peace and security that we want for this world. There
should be no ethnic discrimination. People are people despite the difference in
color, physical structure and language. We all affect each other by moves that we
do. Our concern should not just limit in ourselves but should be extended to the
others.

Conclusion

Individuals do perceive issues differently. What surrounds them help them create an
understanding towards a subject. Media has the great influence on the belief of
each people. Sometimes, people believe in what they saw and hear in
advertisements or on what they see in television. All these press releases made
impact or put factor in contributing in shaping individual’s perception on certain
subject.

Since students are the subject of this study, ones said by the Philippine hero that
the youth are the hope of nation. Also, they are the succeeding leaders of their
generation. How could that probably happen if there are youth who are out of
school and committed themselves in doing destructive behaviors’?

The institutions has a significant role in influencing or shaping these students mind
but the institution is not oblige of forcing to instill to students what they want, they
should only act as guidance. It is indeed better to also open the minds of their
students not only with course chosen by the students, it is good even once in a
while to let them be expose of the reality of issues pertaining to security not only to
human but also beyond that.

For them to become effective leaders of their generation, they have to be

developed in a sense that they will be open to changes, widen their minds in what
they believe in and that they should not be bias. On a personal note, each student
has a potential of becoming a leader, however to become effective they must be
able to educate themselves first of what should be. They should not be contented
on just a particular subject of life but they should go beyond their limit. Explore is
important as well as willingness to learn.
Name:________________________________________ Age:_________
Year/Course:___________________________________

Greetings!
Here are 30 items that attempts to estimate the level of one’s perception of peace
and security. We would like to ask for your kind participation in helping us fulfill our
requirement in one of our major class by answering the following questionnaires.
Rest assured that your responses would be kept strictly confidential and would only
be used for academic purposes.

Instruction: Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with each of
the following statements by placing mark in the appropriate box.

SA – Strongly Agree SD – Strongly Disagree

A – Agree D - Disagree
N – Neither Agree nor Disagree

S A N S D
A D
POLITICAL
1 Having one leader to take responsibility of everything will secure
the whole world.
2 Equal distribution of political power to the people makes a secured
society.
3 Security means having no good governance.
4 Strict implementation of rules and regulations is not needed in
order to systematize the world.
5 The presence of terrorism means the existence of casualties, death,
violations and destructions.
6 Traditional responses, such as military intervention and economic
embargo, are effective ways of resolving conflicts.
7 Humanitarian response, such as diplomatic negotiation, can resolve
the conflict.
8 Intervention of third party actors in conflict is not helpful or not
important in de-escalation of conflict between belligerent parties.
9 By addressing the root or breeding ground of conflict is a way in
stopping the cycle of conflict.
1 Military security does not include the protection of civilian from
0 rebel attacks.
 ECONOMIC
1 Economic security is not part of the national security.
2 Economic globalization does not guarantee the protection of the market.
3 The roles of international institution in the market give significant role in
maintaining security among the traders.
4 Economic resources are often caused of conflicts.
5 Resources needed not to be distributed accordingly to have order and
organization among the people.
6 Proper maximization of resources leads to a peaceful society.
7 The continuous production of weapons by private companies should be
address to stop the proliferation of arms that causes the escalation of
conflicts.
8 Legal limit on the quantity of a good that may be imported cannot secure
the local production of goods.
9 Unlawful use of national funds can trigger a conflict.
1 Good banking interest rates, saving plans, elastic loans and credit
0 assistance will not lead to another bubble burst like the 1997 Asian
Financial Crisis.

SOCIAL
1 Security is freedom from wants.
2 Fair education should be afforded to everyone.
3 There is no gender bias on politics and religion.
4 There should be no freedom in religious affiliation and political belief.
5 Security is the existence of ethnic discrimination.
6 The use and recruitment of children in armed conflict is useful in
resolving the chaos
7 Violations of human rights need not to be addressed.
8 Inequality among the people often becomes the trigging factor in conflict
outburst.
9 Healthy lifestyle, absence of malnutrition means security.
1 Environmental protection is world security.
0

Thank
You,

Ma. Elise Cipriano and

Rona Ysais
 MA-
International Studies Students
Inte
rnational Peace and Security
Provided below are detailed summary of the responses of college students from St.
Paul University.

POLITCAL

Political question 1: Having one leader to take responsibility of everything will

secure the whole world. 30% of the respondents disagree; 20% strongly disagree;
20% shows that neither they agree or disagree; 20% Agree and 10%strongly
disagree.

Political Question 2: Equal distribution of political power to the people makes a

secured society. 50% agree; 40% strongly disagree and 10% disagree.

Political Question 3: Security means having no good governance. 30% disagree;

20% strongly disagree; 20% neither they agree or disagree; 20% agree; and 10%
strongly agree.

Political Question 4: Strict implementation of rules and regulations is not needed in

order to systematize the world. 40% strongly agree; 20% agree; 30% disagree; and
10% strongly disagree

Political Question 5: The presence of terrorism means the existence of casualties,

death, violations and destruction. 60% strongly agree; 30% agree; and 10% neither
they agree or disagree.

Political Question 6: Traditional responses, such as military intervention and

economic embargo, are effective ways of resolving conflicts. 50% agree; and 50%
neither they agree or disagree.

Political Question 7: Humanitarian response, such as diplomatic negotiation can

resolve the conflict. 50% Agree; 10% strongly agree; 30% neither they agree or
disagree; and 10% strongly disagree.

Political Question 8: Intervention of Third Party Actors in conflict is not helpful or not
important in de-escalation of conflict between belligerent parties. 40% agree; 10%
strongly agree; 40% neither they agree or disagree; and 10% strongly disagree.

Political Question 9: By addressing the root or breeding ground of the conflict is a

way in stopping the cycle of conflict. 50% strongly agree; 30% agree; 10% neither
they agree or disagree; and 10% disagree.

Political Question 10: Military security does not include the protection of civilian
from rebel attacks. 10% strongly agree; 10% agree; 30% neither they agree or
disagree; 20% strongly agree; and 30% disagree.

ECONOMICS
Economic Question 1: Economic Security is not part of the national secretary. 50%
strongly disagree; 20% disagree; 10% neither they agree or disagree; and 20%
agree.

Economic Question 2: Economic globalization does not guarantee the protection of

the market. 20% strongly agree; 50% agree; 20% neither they agree or disagree;
10% disagree.

Economic Question 3: The roles of international institution in the market give

significant role in maintaining security among the traders. 10% agree; 60% strongly
agree; 30% agree.
Economic Question 4: Economic resources are often caused of conflicts. 40%
strongly agree; 50% agree; 10% agree.

Economic Question 5: Resources needed not to be distributed accordingly to have

order and organization among the people. 50% agree; 20% neither they agree or
disagree; 10% strongly disagree; 20% disagree.

Economic Question 6: Proper maximizing of resources leads to a peaceful society.

50% strongly agree; 40% agree; 10% neither they agree nor disagree.

Economic Question 7: The continuous production of weapons by private companies

should address to stop the proliferation of arms that causes the escalation of
conflicts. 20% strongly agree; 50% agree; 10% strongly disagree; 20% disagree.

Economic Question 8: Legal limit on the quantity of a good that may be imported
cannot secure the local production of goods. 20% strongly agree; 30% agree; 30%
neither they agree or disagree; 20% disagree.

Economic Question 9: Unlawful use of national funds can trigger a conflict. 50%
strongly agree; 30% agree; 20% neither they agree or disagree.

Economic Question 10: Good banking interest rates, saving plans, elastic loans and
credit assistance will not lead to another bubble burst like the 1997 Asian Financial
Crisis. 30% strongly agree; 40% agree;
20% neither they agree or disagree.

SOCIAL

Social Question 1: Security is freedom wants. 20% strongly agree; 30% agree; 20%
neither they agree or disagree; 30% disagree.

Social Question 2: Fair education should be afforded to everyone. 60% strongly

agree; 40% agree.

Social Question 3: There is no gender bias on politics and religion. 60% strongly
agree; 20% agree; 10% neither they agree or disagree; 10% strongly disagree.
Social Question 4: There should be no freedom in religious affiliation and political
belief. 10% strongly agree; 10% agree; 20% neither they agree or disagree; 40%
strongly disagree; 20% disagree.

Social Question 5: Security is the existence of ethnic discrimination. 10% strongly

agree; 10% agree; 50% neither they agree or disagree; 10% strongly disagree; 20%
disagree.

Social Question 6: The use and recruitment of children in armed conflict is useful in
resolving the chaos. 20% strongly agree; 10% agree; 30% neither they agree or
disagree; 10% strongly disagree; 30% disagree.

Social Question 7: Violations of human rights need not to be addressed. 20% agree;
10% neither they agree or disagree; 50% strongly disagree; 20% disagree.
Social Question 8: Inequality among the people often becomes the trigging factor in
conflict outburst. 30% strongly agree; 50% agree; 10% neither they agree or
disagree; 10% strongly disagree.

Social Question 9: Healthy lifestyle, absence of malnutrition means security. 30%

strongly agree; 50% agree; 10% neither they agree or disagree; 10% disagree.

Social Question 10: Environment protection is world security. 40% strongly agree;
50% agree; 10% neither they agree or disagree.

Survey result from Miriam College, Communication Arts Student

Political question 1: Having one leader to take responsibility of everything will

secure the whole world. 10% of the respondents agree; 10% disagree; 80% shows
that neither they agree or disagree.

Political Question 2: Equal distribution of political power to the people makes a

secured society. 20% strongly agree; 30% agree; 50% of the respondents show that
neither they agree or disagree.

Political Question 3: Security means having no good governance. 10% strongly

agree; 50% of them strongly disagree; 40% disagree.

Political Question 4: Strict implementation of rules and regulations is not needed in

order to systematize the world. 60% of the respondents strongly disagree; 40% of
them only disagree;

Political Question 5: The presence of terrorism means the existence of casualties,

death, violations and destruction. 30% strongly agreed; 70% of them disagreed.

Political Question 6: Traditional responses, such as military intervention and

economic embargo, are effective ways of resolving conflicts. 20% agreed; 10%
neither agree nor disagree; 10% strongly disagree and 60% disagree.
Political Question 7: Humanitarian response, such as diplomatic negotiation can
resolve the conflict. 20% Agree; 30% strongly agree; 50% neither they agree or
disagree.

Political Question 8: Intervention of Third Party Actors in conflict is not helpful or not
important in de-escalation of conflict between belligerent parties. 10% agree; 80%
neither they agree or disagree; and 10% disagree.

Political Question 9: By addressing the root or breeding ground of the conflict is a

way in stopping the cycle of conflict. 40% strongly agree; 50% of the respondents
agree; 10% neither they agree or disagree.

Political Question 10: Military security does not include the protection of civilian
from rebel attacks. 10% agree; 40% neither they agree or disagree; 30% strongly
disagree; and 20% disagree.

ECONOMICS

Economic Question 1: Economic Security is not part of the national secretary. 40%
strongly disagree; 30% disagree; 30% neither agree nor disagree.
Economic Question 2: Economic globalization does not guarantee the protection of
the market. 20% agree; 80% neither they agree or disagree.

Economic Question 3: The roles of international institution in the market give

significant role in maintaining security among the traders. 10% strongly agree; 50%
agree; 20% neither agree nor disagree and 20% disagree.

Economic Question 4: Economic resources are often caused of conflicts. 40%

strongly agree; 20% neither agree nor disagree; 20% strongly disagree; 20%
disagree.

Economic Question 5: Resources needed not to be distributed accordingly to have

order and organization among the people. 40% neither agree nor disagree; 20%
strongly disagree; 40% disagree.

Economic Question 6: Proper maximizing of resources leads to a peaceful society.

50% strongly agree; 40% agree; 10% neither they agree nor disagree.

Economic Question 7: The continuous production of weapons by private companies

should address to stop the proliferation of arms that causes the escalation of
conflicts. 30% strongly agree; 40% agree; 20% strongly disagree; 10% disagree.

Economic Question 8: Legal limit on the quantity of a good that may be imported
cannot secure the local production of goods. 10% strongly agree; 70% neither agree
nor disagree; 10% strongly disagree; 10% disagree.

Economic Question 9: Unlawful use of national funds can trigger a conflict. 80% of
them strongly agree; 20% agree.
Economic Question 10: Good banking interest rates, saving plans, elastic loans and
credit assistance will not lead to another bubble burst like the 1997 Asian Financial
Crisis. 10% strongly agree; 70% neither agree nor disagree; 20% disagree.

SOCIAL

Social Question 1: Security is freedom wants. 20% strongly agree; 10% agree; 70%
neither they agree or disagree.

Social Question 2: Fair education should be afforded to everyone. 80% strongly

agree; 20% agree.

Social Question 3: There is no gender bias on politics and religion. 60% strongly
agree; 40% agree.

Social Question 4: There should be no freedom in religious affiliation and political

belief. 10% agree; 30% neither they agree or disagree; 30% strongly disagree; 30%
disagree.

Social Question 5: Security is the existence of ethnic discrimination. 80% strongly

disagree; 20% disagree.

Social Question 6: The use and recruitment of children in armed conflict is useful in
resolving the chaos. 100% strongly disagree.
Social Question 7: Violations of human rights need not to be addressed. 90%
strongly disagree; 10% are neither agreeing nor disagreeing.

Social Question 8: Inequality among the people often becomes the trigging factor in
conflict outburst. 50% agree and 50% strongly agree.

Social Question 9: Healthy lifestyle, absence of malnutrition means security. 30%

strongly agree; 20% agree; 10% are neither agree nor disagree; 40% disagree.

Social Question 10: Environment protection is world security. 30% strongly agree;
20% agree; 30% are neither agree nor disagree and 20% disagree.