Modi Exposed 2014 Report Awaaz

Narendra Modi Exposed
CHALLENGING THE MYTHS SURROUNDING THE BJPS PRImE MINISTERIAL CANDIDATE
EDITED bY
GAUTAm AppA AND ANISH VANAIK Published by Awaaz Network 2014
PUbLISHED bY Awaaz Network and The Monitoring Group

London Civil Rights and Art Centre Upper Floors, 37 Museum Street London WC1A 1LQ office@awaaz-uk.org www.awaaz-uk.org The Monitoring Group Awaaz Network All rights reserved Design Jagdish Patel
Distributed under license by the Awaaz Network First Edition, February 2014 Printed by the The Monitoring Group
First Edition ISBN 978-0-9576974-2-3
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF SAEED DAWOOD, SAKIL DAWOOD, MOHAMMED ASWAT, YUSUF PAREGAR AND ALL THOSE THOUSANDS KILLED DURING THE GUJARAT GENOCIDE OF 2002
NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED
AWAAZ NETWORK
Contents
GLOSSARY OF TERmS AND AbbREVIATIONS INTRODUcTION

5 7 10 16 18 26 32 38 48 56
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Narendra Modi: The Making of a Hindutva Leader Narendra Modis culpability in the Gujarat Genocide The Murder of British Citizens in a Genocide Forgotten A Clean Chit? Has Narendra Modi been Absolved by the Supreme Court? Violence and Control: Modi, Hindutva and Women Dont Believe the Hype: Modis Model of Governance Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar Hindutva Fascism in the UK
AWAAZ NETWORK
Glossary of terms and abbreviations

Bajrang Dal: (lit. Hanumans Army) The youth wing of the VHP, it has been involved in the most violent actions of the Sangh Parivar since the 1980s. BJP: Bharatiya Janata Party (lit. Indian Peoples Party) The major opposition party in India today and the wing of the Sangh Parivar (see below) involved in electoral politics (for more details see Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar) Genocide: (according to definition adopted by UN General Assembly on December 9 1948) when any of the following acts are committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious groups such as: a. Killing members of the group b. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group c. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part d. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group e. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group Hindutva: An ideology that defines Indian nationalism in terms of Hindu values. It suggests that only those people can be full citizens of India whose fatherland and holy land are situated in India. (For more details see Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar) HSS: Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh (lit. Hindu Volunteers Corps) The UK offshoot of the RSS that presides over a family of organisations in UK that espouse Hindutva. (for further details see Hindutva Fascism in the UK) RSS: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (lit. National Volunteers Corps) Established in 1925-26, an exclusively male organization dedicated to propagating the political ideology of Hindutva. It presides over the Sangh Parivar (for further details see Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar) Sangh Parivar: (lit. Family of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) The group of organisations presided over by the RSS dedicated to propagating Hindutva. Different bodies operate in different spheres and on specific issues. (for further details see Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar) VHP: Vishwa Hindu Parishad (lit. World Hindu Council) The member of the Sangh Parivar dedicated to the propagation of Hinduism internationally and in India. (for further details see Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar).
NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED 7
AWAAZ NETWORK
Introduction
Narendra Modi is the Prime Ministerial candidate for Indias main opposition party in the General Elections to be held before May this year. As Chief Minister of the state of Gujarat in 2002, Modi presided over a massacre of Muslims that conforms to the UN definition of genocide. At the time this had evoked widespread domestic and international condemnation. Recently, however, there has been a determined campaign to paint him in a different light. One prong of the campaign has been to argue that the events of 2002 should be consigned to the past as the Supreme Court of India has given Modi a clean chit. The second prong has been to present Modi as a uniquely competent administrator who has worked miracles in Gujarat. This collection of briefings presents facts that challenge both these claims and argues that Modi remains a figure deserving international opprobrium and should remain a persona non grata for us here in Britain. The articles that follow cover a number of different questions: Narendra Modi: The Making of a Hindutva Leader Associated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) since the age of eight, Modi has consistently espoused their Hindu-supremacist ideology. Chetan Bhatt (Director, Centre for the Study of Human Rights at LSE) shows that Modi has been involved in the communally-divisive mass mobilisations of the RSS since the 1980s. This includes the lead up to the destruction of the Ayodhya mosque in 1992 and its violent aftermath. Narendra Modis Culpability in the Gujarat Genocide: A Factsheet Gautam Appa (Professor Emeritus, London School of Economics) and Suresh Grover (Director of The Monitoring Group) provide a succinct summary of the events of 2002 where over 2000 people, mostly Muslim, were killed. They also outline Modis nefarious role in instigating and promoting the carnage. The Murder of British Citizens in a Genocide Forgotten Grover writes about the horrific experience of four British Muslims during their visit to Gujarat in February-March 2002. Three out of their party of four were murdered. Their families continue to struggle for justice in India and the UK. A Clean Chit? Has Narendra Modi been Absolved by the Supreme Court? Appa points out that the Supreme Court (SC) has never pronounced on Modis guilt. A Special Investigation Team appointed by the SC had suggested that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute Modi. This has been contradicted by the advocate appointed by the SC to review the teams evidence. In fact, the judicial process continues.
Violence and Control: Modi, the Sangh Parivar and Women Pragna Patel, Director of the Southall Black Sisters, discusses the crucial issue of the patriarchal cast of Hindutva ideology. Most chillingly, in 2002 it was manifested as systematic rape and assault of Muslim women in Gujarat. Modis deep-seated belief in the exercise of control over women continues to be in evidence in Gujarat since 2002. Dont Believe the Hype: Modis Model of Governance Appa shows that the image of Modi as a model administrator in Gujarat is largely PR spin. On most counts of human development Modis performance is risible. Even in terms of growth, Modis role is much more modest than has been propagated. Corruption and cronyism remain rife. Mob violence against Muslims is the only area where his administrative record remains unsurpassed. Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar Bhatt surveys the ideals and organisation of the RSS in India. Inspired by the German and Italian fascist parties, it promotes an exclusionary Hindutva ideology envisioning a Hindu India in which non-Hindus are second class citizens. In organisational terms, the Sangh Parivar (family of the RSS) consists of BJP in parliamentary politics, VHP in Hindu religious fold, Bajrang Dal as a youth wing, ABVP as a student wing, Rashtra Sevika Samiti as the womens wing and many more among workers, tribal people and a plethora of cultural, social and voluntary work organisations controlled by the RSS to foster Hindutva. Hindutva Fascism in the UK Finally, Bhatt documents the organisational fronts and networks the RSS has established in UK to further its Hindu-supremacist aims. Many of these, such as the National Hindu Students Forum, deny any connection with the RSS but work to fund and support RSS activities and aims. They have had a disproportionate influence in Parliament and work to provide material support to the RSS in India. One consequence of Modis role in the 2002 riots was his pariah status abroad. In the aftermath the US State department revoked his business and tourist visas because of his involvement in serious violations of religious freedom. Based on its own investigations, the UK government adopted a de facto policy of non-engagement with Modi. Consequently he was unable to take up invitations to speak at various events in the UK in 2005 and 2009. His opponents in India keep pointing to this blemish in his record. Consequently, the international community is a key target for Modis rebranding as a model administrator. In a move that many saw as putting economic expediency before moral responsibility, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) sent the British High Commissioner to visit him in October 2012. I am no longer a pariah; the British have come to their senses at last and are willing to
10
AWAAZ NETWORK
welcome me, crowed Modi. Even here, however, the FCO was compelled to claim that the decision to re-engage Modi was in part to secure justice for the families of the three Muslim British nationals who were killed in the Gujarat riots and that engagement is not the same as endorsement. So the stigma of pariah status was not entirely removed. This is when the Labour and Tory Friends of India stepped in with an invitation to Modi to address MPs in the House of Parliament. When pressed, they peddled a fictitious clean chit to Modi by the Supreme Court of India. The whitewash of Modis image was complete. Modi is now perceived as a legitimate contender to be Prime Minister of India. Even the US government, in February 2014, has changed its tune and sought an official meeting with Modi. No explanation has been given about why his serious violation of religious freedom is forgiven. Meanwhile, the victims of the violence he unleashed cry out for justice. It is important to redress this cynical attempt at undermining the fight for justice by the thousands of victims of Gujarat riots including the families of British Muslims killed there. Modi should remain a pariah in Britain.
11
ONE Narendra Modi: The Making of a Hindutva Leader

Prof. Chetan Bhatt, Director, Centre for the Study of Human Rights, London School of Economics
Summary Narendra Modi has had a lifelong association with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). His career has been built on organisational and ideological commitment to the Hindu nationalist ideals of the Sangh Parivar. Modi has been involved in the communally-divisive and violent mass mobilisations of the Sangh Parivar since the 1970s. This includes the mobilisations that led up to the destruction of the Ayodhya mosque in 1992 and its bloody aftermath. Through this period Modi has worked with a wide variety of Sangh-affiliates ranging from the VHP and its violent youth wing (Bajrang Dal), to the RSS student wing and the BJP. Modis rise through the ranks of the Sangh Parivar, including his stint as Gujarat Chief Minister, has been through the beneficence of the RSS. His ferocious ambition as CM in Gujarat temporarily alienated the militaristic RSS. His nomination as prime ministe rial candidate for the BJP was, however, once again secured through the blessing of the RSS. An extensive and well-coordinated PR campaign, across different kinds of media, has tried to sweep Modis human rights record under the carpet while painting him as a uniquely competent and business-friendly leader. Modi continues to deny responsibility of any kind for the 2002 genocide in Gujarat or its longer-term fallout. He also refuses to apologise for his statements and role during those events.
12
AWAAZ NETWORK
Narendra Modi is the Prime Ministerial candidate of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for the forthcoming Indian General Election, to be held before the end of May 2014. Modi has been the Chief Minister of the state of Gujarat since October 2001. Following the carnage in Gujarat in 2002 and further polarization of communities, he employed extreme anti-minority political rhetoric to win three consecutive state assembly elections in 2002, 2007 and 2012. Narendra Modi is deeply committed to the far-right extremist, violent and anti-democratic ideology of Hindutva. Hindutva postulates that India should become an exclusively Hindu Nation-State (see Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar). The Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS), whose core ideology is Hindutva, was formed in the mid-1920s under the direct inspiration of National Socialism and Fascism. Since its inception, the RSS has been involved in numerous mass anti-minority campaigns, and has been repeatedly implicated in acts of serious communal violence in independent India. The assassination of Gandhi was undertaken by Nathuram Godse, a member of the RSS. The RSS provides the ideology and personnel for a number of organisations active at different levels of civil and political society in India: among others these include the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and the Bajrang Dal. These are termed the Sangh Parivar (family of the RSS). Modis political journey, his political style, his ideas, actions and thinking have been definitively shaped by his life-long association with the RSS and its family. Despite recent attempts to present him simply as an efficient leader committed to investment and development, he remains proud of his membership of the RSS and actively espouses its Hindutva worldview. This is hardly surprising as he has been consistently associated with the RSS and its family since the age of eight, and his commitment to the RSS is amply demonstrated by a recapitulation of his career within it.1
Modi at a political rally, September 2013 by NarendraModiofficial
I am nationalist. Im patriotic. Nothing is wrong. I am born Hindu. Nothing is wrong. So Im a Hindu nationalist. So yes, you can say Im a Hindu nationalist because Im a born Hindu. Narendra Modi, July 2013
On his RSS history, see K. Nag, The NaMo Story: a political life, New Delhi: Roli Books, 2013; N. Mukhopadhyay, Narendra Modi: the man, the times, New Delhi: Tranquebar Press, 2013 (Kindle edition).
13
After receiving RSS training at its headquarters in Nagpur Modi took charge of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the student wing of the RSS, in Gujarat.2 His next assignment, from 1971 onwards, was as a full-time worker and propagator (pracharak) for the RSS at its Gujarat headquarters. In 1973, he was assigned a key role by the RSS in the organisation of a major VHP gathering (sammelan) in Gujarat. During the so-called Emergency period declared by Indira Gandhi from 1975-77, Modi worked in the RSSs national underground network and wrote a book in Gujarati on the RSSs role during the Emergency. In the 1980s, Modi rose up the RSS ranks in Gujarat from being a divisional (sub-regional) full-time worker to the assistant organisational head and a zonal office bearer. He also undertook coordination activities among the RSS family of organisations, including its student wing and the VHP, and was in charge of the RSSs publications operations in Gujarat. Up to the early 2000s, the RSS actively promoted Modis political career, including his campaign to become Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2001. In 1987, Modi was one of the first full-time workers sent by the RSS to work for the BJP and in 1989 he became general secretary of the Gujarat BJP. Prior to this, he was involved in organising the campaign that led to the BJPs victory in the Ahmedabad municipal elections. He became National Secretary of the BJP in 1995 and General Secretary for Organisation for the BJP at all-India level in 1998. In these various capacities Modi was centrally involved in the deeply communal and divisive Hindu supremacist campaigns of the 1980s, including the infamous chariot pilgrimage (Rath Yatra) of the BJP and VHP from Gujarat to Ayodhya in 1990.3 The campaign explicitly aimed to retake the sixteenth-century Babri mosque, claiming it was the birthplace of the Hindu deity Ram. The Rath Yatra led to considerable violence throughout India and eventually the destruction of the mosque by Sangh Parivar volunteers in 1992. Similarly, in 1991 Modi had been a key organiser in the RSS and VHPs Ekta pilgrimage (unity pilgrimage) campaign across India (from Kanyamumari to Kashmir), aimed at reclaiming the nation as Hindu and in the process terrorising minorities; Modi was the charioteer in this latter pilgrimage and organised the saffron army (kesariya vahini) of youth, from the RSS student wing and the extremely violent Bajrang Dal, for this campaign.4 Similarly, Modi was involved in the organisation of another farright pilgrimage campaign in 1997 from Bombay to Delhi which was aimed at making Muslims accept their secondary status under Hindutva ideology.5 After he became Gujarats Chief Minister in 2001, relations between the RSS and Modi became strained. The key reason was the RSSs tradition that its affiliates, including the BJP, must remain essentially subservient to the RSS and report to or consult with the RSS state or national leadership on all important
2 3 4 5 K. Nag, ibid, page 42. N. Mukhopadhyay, op cit (Kindle edition). N. Mukhopadhyay, ibid (Kindle edition) N. Mukhopadhyay, ibid (Kindle edition)
14
AWAAZ NETWORK
decisions. Modis increasing power and authoritarianism in Gujarat after 2002 meant that the RSSs expectations about Modis subservience were not met. Nevertheless, positive relations resumed again following the RSSs decisive support for Modis campaign to be accepted as the BJPs candidate for Prime Ministership in 2012.6 Partly because of the international condemnation of the violence in Gujarat and the persistent and wide-spread allegations of his complicity, Modi has felt the need to generate a massive and diverse international public relations campaign in his favour.7 This has spawned a veritable cult of personality centred on Modi being diffused by the extensive network of RSS supporters in India, UK, US and elsewhere; by international public relations firms; by the so-called Modibots (a dedicated army of zealots who bombard electronic and social media sites that post any criticism of Narendra Modi); and by some UK and US politicians, such as Barry Gardiner MP. The image presented, through considerable effort, is of Narendra Modi as an exceptionally and uniquely competent, business-friendly leader (see Dont Believe the Hype: Modis Model of Governance). This has erased entirely his RSS affiliation, commitment to Hindutva political ideology, blatant antipathy towards minorities, and the barbarity of the Gujarat carnage (See Narendra Modis Culpability in the Gujarat Genocide: A Factsheet). This veritable public relations blitzkrieg has muddled even liberal opinion, which has been stumped by the deliberate Hindutva strategy of shrieking anti-Hindu, anti-Indian or anti-Gujarati whenever Modi or extremist Hindutva ideology is criticised. Even within the spectrum of Hindutva politics, Narendra Modis political career has continually and glaringly demonstrated the most strident, intolerant and divisive of Hindutva tendencies. In the aftermath of the Gujarat carnage, he callously referred to the relief camps for Muslims victims of the carnage as baby-making factories, also making use of a hateful anti-Muslim slogan that each Muslim man has 4 wives and 25 children. His use of deeply
All our efforts have therefore to be concentrated in the direction of generating invincible national strength by making our people nationally conscious and moulding them for a welldisciplined, coordinated and invincibly powerful national entity, which alone is the ultimate sanction for a free and glorious national life on the face of this earth. M.S. Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Part 3, Ch. 22
6 7
N.Mukhopadhyay, ibid., K. Nag, op cit. R. Ayyub (2013), Modis Operandi, Tehelka, no.14, vol.10, (13 April) http://www.tehelka. com/modis-operandi/
15
sectarian language against Christians and Muslims has been a consistent theme. In 2012, ten years after the Gujarat atrocities (for which he has refused to apologise or bear responsibility of any sort), he compared his own position to that of a passenger in a car that runs over a puppy of course it will be painful, he said, while adding that he had no guilty feeling about the events. These views of Modis are part of a clear pattern of intolerant speech and action exhibited throughout his political career to demean non-Hindus while rousing the most chauvinistic, hate-driven and violent Hindu supremacism.
16
AWAAZ NETWORK
17
TWo NARENDRA MoDIS CULPABILItY IN tHE GUJARAt GENoCIDE: A FACtSHEEt

Suresh Grover, Director, The Monitoring Group and Prof. Gautam Appa, Professor Emeritus, London School of Economics and
58 people, mainly Hindu zealots, died on 27 February 2002 when a train coach caught fire at Godhra station in Gujarat. A commission of inquiry set up by the Union cabinet concluded in 2005 that the fire was an accident. Another inquiry set up by Modis government said in 2008 that it was a pre-planned conspiracy. What did Modi do after visiting the site of the burn train on 27 February 2002?
a) Declared, within hours and without any investigation or intelligence reports, that this was a conspiracy by Godhra Muslims and the Pakistani Intelligence agency ISI. b) Handed over the charred bodies to the VHP (a Hindu Nationalist extremist organisation) who paraded them 85 miles away in Ahmedabad, the commercial capital of Gujarat, drumming up antiMuslim hysteria in the state. c) Let BJP, his political party, support a call from VHP for a Gujarat-wide closure (Bandh) for three days. d) Called a meeting of senior police officers at his residence to instruct them not to interfere with Hindu mobs reaction to this action by Muslims. e) a) Stopped the army from intervening to end the violence for 3 days. A massacre of Muslims followed over 3 days in which: A systematic genocide left more than 2000 dead.
b) Muslim women were particular targets of violence - many were assaulted with weapons, raped, butchered and burnt alive. c) Despite repeated calls, the police refused to help Muslims. Even Ehsan Jafri, a Muslim Congress ex-MP, was brutally butchered along with his neighbours in Gulberg Housing Society in Ahmedabad. d) Three British Muslims Mohammad Aswat and Saeed and Sakil Dawood travelling in Gujarat were killed. Another, Imran Dawood, survived after being left for dead e)
18
Over 200,000 Muslims lost their homes and ended up in refugee camps
AWAAZ NETWORK
Since then
a) Several human rights bodies - Human Rights Watch, National Human Rights Commission, National Commission for Minorities, Citizens Tribunal, Amnesty International, etc. - have castigated Modi and his government for allowing the massacre. b) Until 2012 Britain had banned Modi coming here for an official visit. EU countries had followed suit. In August 2012, when it seemed likely that Modi will become the prime ministerial candidate of the main opposition party BJP in India the British High Commissioner met with him and EU countries also lifted their ban. c) In 2005 the US State department revoked Modis business and tourist visas because of his involvement in serious violations of religious freedom. On 12 February 2014, the US ambassador has sought a meeting with him, effectively ending the US governments boycott of Modi. No explanation with respect to his earlier serious violations of religious freedom were offered. d) The Supreme Court of India (SC) has condemned Modis government as modern-day Neros [who] were looking elsewhere when innocent children and helpless women were being burnt and were probably deliberating how the perpetrators can be saved. e) Showing no faith in the Modi governments impartiality SC has moved many riot-related court cases away from Gujarat, appointed a Special Investigative Team (SIT) to look into Modis culpability for the riots and an Amicus Curiae to make an independent assessment of the findings of the SIT. f) Maya Kodnani, a BJP MLA who was appointed minister for Women and Child Development by Modi (despite pending allegations of her involvement in the riots) has been convicted of murder and conspiracy to commit murder and sentenced to 28 years in prison in the case relating to one of the more infamous massacres during the riots. g) An appeal is being lodged against Gujarat magistrate courts verdict accepting SITs conclusion that there was insufficient prosecutable evidence against Modi. Arguments will now be heard in the Gujarat High Court. h) Imran Dawood, survivor of the attack in February 2002, has instructed lawyers to use his affidavit to arrest Modi should he enter the UK. However such an action would have to be agreed by the Attorney General.
19
tHREE
The Murder of British Citizens in a Genocide Forgotten

Suresh Grover - Director of the Monitoring Group
Summary
On February 28 2002, four British Muslims driving through Gujarat, and their local Muslim driver, were attacked by a murderous Hindu mob near Prantij. Only one of them, Imran Da wood, survived the incident. The Gujarat Police, in whose presence much of the incident took place, refused to assist the party. After the incident, they conducted a slipshod investigation and refused, for many months to either interview or arrest the suspects who had carried out the carnage. Only after pressure was applied by the Dawood family and the British Deputy High Commis sioner was it possible to arrest and charge anyone. The progress of the case, however, contin ues to be obstructed by the judicial system in Gujarat. Among other factors, this is because of the fact that the public prosecutor was a Sangh Parivar activist.
The Dawood family, since 2002, has chosen to seek justice through a campaign that uses legal options and international pressure. Their aim is to both convict those guilty of murdering the tourists and driver but also those who created the conditions for the outbreak of the genocide. The Dawood family are currently proceeding with a criminal case against the members of the mob and a civil case against Narendra Modi and members of his cabinet for acts of commis sion and omission that led to the fatal events of February 2002. The BJP government since coming to power in 1998 had taken numerous actions to marginal ize and victimize minorities in the state. Narendra Modi, appointed Chief Minister in 2001, continued these actions. Narendra Modis personal culpability for the anti-Muslim genocide of 2002 is well established by his actions and speech on February 27 and immediately after. This includes raising com munal passions through baseless allegations, supporting a bandh (closure) called by the VHP on 28 February and 1 March, and instructing the police to take no action against Hindus dur ing these days.
The manner with which the UK Government has chosen to engage with Modi and in
20
particular the role of prominent MPs such as Barry Gardiner is in stark contrast to British interests and values. A dubious clean chit has been peddled to whitewash the facts and win favour with Narendra Modi, putting economic expediency beforemoral responsibility. HM Goverrnment imposed a 12 year ban on Narendra Modi for justifiable reasons and must uphold the rights of our citizens to justice.
AWAAZ NETWORK
In February 2002 two brothers from Batley, Yorkshire Sakil and Saeed Dawood went to India with their childhood friend Mohammed Aswat and their 18-year-old nephew, Imran Dawood. While returning from an excursion trip to fulfill a childhood dream to see the majestic beauty of the Taj Mahal their joyous adventure turned into a nightmare. What follows is a harrowing and haunting account of a frenzied mob set on murdering individuals for no other reason than their religion and the subsequent momentous struggle by the Dawood family for justice for their loved ones and others who perished in the genocidal violence. At about 6 p.m. on the evening of 28th February 2002, the four British tourists were travelling in a jeep with a local driver, Yusuf Paregar, on one of Gujarats main highways. Hours after crossing the Gujarat state border, as they entered the town of Prantij, they could see smoke emanating from buildings a few hundred yards off the highway. At this time they passed a police vehicle that contained two police officers. They asked these police officers whether it was safe to continue their journey. Upon receiving a confirmation that it was safe to continue, they moved on but the driver remained anxious. He stopped for a while and then started driving slowly. Suddenly they encountered a mob that had set up a roadblock. A coach ahead of them that had been stopped, left without being troubled by the mob. The car immediately in front of them was then stopped. That car too was allowed to proceed. Next, their vehicle was stopped by the mob.
At first Imran and his companions were asked to hand over a bottle of water. The driver handed over a bottle of water. The person that had received the bottle emptied the bottle of its contents and poured petrol into it. The driver was then asked where they were from and whether they were Muslims. Then, some of the mob members noticed that their vehicle had Arabic inscriptions and proceeded to attack the vehicle and its occupants. The driver attempted to drive off but the mob chased them, some on foot and others on motorcycles. As their vehicle moved further they encountered another mob. A large log had been laid across the road which the driver avoided by swerving off and then back on it. Having now noticed that there were greater numbers of people in the distance, the driver turned the vehicle around and tried to flee backwards. Unfortunately, their vehicle stalled. The mob caught up to them and dragged the driver out. Fearing for their lives, Imran and his companions left the vehicle and began running towards a farmhouse two hundred meters away. Near the farmhouse, an elderly lady was washing clothes. They asked for her assistance. She refused and asked them to leave. Soon after this, the tourists were cornered by a mob of about twenty people. A frantic discussion took place, during which people were heard saying that the tourists should be killed as they were Muslims. Saeed and Sakil pleaded with them and showed them their passports and British currency to prove they were tourists and had no quarrel with the mob. Imran was stabbed in the leg, kicked and hit on the head. Mohammed Aswat was being beaten viciously and Imran went to help him. He held Aswat, who then fell to the ground. Both Sakil and Saeed were also being attacked by the mob. In a dazed and injured state, Imran managed to scramble away with Aswat in his arms.
The Dawoods burnt jeep inspected by the Gujarat police weeks after the incident by Dawood family archive
At this point, the police arrived on the scene, almost thirty minutes after the initial incident. The police helped Imran into their vehicle and then placed the motionless Aswat in the back. Imran pleaded with the police to help his uncles nearby. They refused but promised to come back in ten minutes. The police then took Imran and Aswat to the nearby Public Health Care Center. Mohammad Aswat was declared dead on arrival. In the meantime, the driver had been beaten to death by the mob, his body thrown onto the jeep and both set alight. Imran Dawood woke up next morning only to learn that his uncles were still missing and the police, despite their promise, had made no effort to go back to scene and search for them. Had the local police acted professionally, these murders could have been prevented. The police could have alerted the tourists not to travel into the danger area when asked by the driver. The initial attack on the jeep and the subsequent chase of the victims by the mob took place within eyeshot of the police, who were no more than two hundreds yards away. Finally, it took them more than thirty minutes to intervene and then only partially. The investigation into the crime against Imran and his companions was deliberately negligent and designed to hide the real culprits. The police had failed to visit the scene of crime, secure any forensic evidence, interview any witnesses or identify any perpetrators. In fact it was Imrans cousin Bilal Dawood who, accompanied by the representative of the British Deputy High Commissioner in Mumbai, searched the scene of the crime and recovered the human bones which were later matched by the DNA fingerprinting Centre in Hyderabad and found to be those of Saeed Dawood. Despite the fact that the initial police report was filed on 28 February 2002, the perpetrators were not interviewed until late April that year. That too was at the insistence of the Dawood family. It was only under pressure from the family and the British Deputy High Commissioner that, in late April 2002, six people were finally charged with the murders. Given the serious nature of the charges, bail was initially refused to the suspects. But bail was granted at the higher court as the application of the perpetrator, shockingly, remained unopposed by the public prosecutor. The latter, it turned out, was a well-known member of the Sangh Parivar.
What happened in Gujarat was not a spontaneous uprising, it was a carefully orchestrated attack against Muslims. The attacks were planned in advance and organized with extensive participation of the police and state government officials. Smita Narula, senior South Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch, May 2002
22
AWAAZ NETWORK
He was only relived of his prosecution duties when he became a judge about a year later. It was under these circumstances, in 2002, that the family decided to launch a campaign combining international public pressure with a legal strategy in India. They sought to both ensure a thorough and proper investigation into the specific crimes against the tourists and the driver, and to hold to account those responsible for creating the political and social environment that fostered the genocidal violence in 2002. In his ongoing civil suit for damages in India, Imran Dawood has named Narendra Modi, Gujarats Chief Minister, and eight of his senior Government officers as among the accused for facilitating or encouraging genocidal violence or failing to act, given their legal and constitutional duties, to prevent the violence. As the Dawood submission to the court states, The murderous attack on the Plaintiff and his companions was part of a pattern of state-wide attacks against Muslims in Gujarat on and from 27th February 2002, directly on account of acts of omission and commission by the Defendant Nos. 1 to 7, which resulted in the injury, death and destruction of their properties, desecration of places of religious worship, economic boycott and humiliation by rampant rape and brutalisation of Muslim women and children, denial of rehabilitation measures and denial of justice.
The evidence of culpability against Narendra Modi et. al. is extensive and can be summarized as follows: In total opposition to the values of equality enshrined in the Indian Constitution, the Sangh Parivar espouse a right wing Hindutva ideology with the ultimate aim of creating a Hindu State in India. There is clear evidence to show that all the affiliates of the Sangh Parivar and its leaders took active part in the anti-Muslim genocide of 2002 with the full support of the Chief Minister. The policies pursued by the BJP as soon as they assumed power in Gujarat in 1998 reflected a systemic pattern of marginalizing, excluding and targeting minority communities, including the Muslim community in the state. For instance, in July 1998 the state department set up a police cell for monitoring inter-religious marriages. This was justified by the then State Home Minister, Haren Pandya on the grounds that such marriages were not made out of free choice but were forced on Hindu women. This was coupled with the disbanding of the police cell set up to investigate atrocities against women. Additionally, In February 1999, a circular was issued by the Director General of Police (Intelligence) to collect selective information about Christians and Muslims. This circular was challenged by several organizations in the Gujarat High Court. However it has still not been cancelled. From 1998 onwards there was a striking policy of withdrawing Muslim officers from field postings as far as possible. There was also an effort to sidestep the normal recruitment process for police by appointing police sahayaks (assistants), who were cadre of the Sangh Parivar. These sahayaks were later drafted into the police service thereby subverting the recruitment procedure. The Gujarat Government also used the Home Guard force as a means to induct VHP and Bajrang Dal cadre into the law enforcement machinery to ensure its compliance and obedience to the Sangh Parivar, thereby subverting the rule of law and all constitutional norms. The State administration was also keen to influence educational material, introducing ideas from Sangh Parivar ideology into social studies text-
23
books. For instance: Muslims, Christians and Parsees are foreigners, The varna system [basis of the caste system] is the best gift to mankind and the glorifying of Fascism and Nazism with a view to justify the exclusion and violence against minorities and to polarize the population in the State on the grounds of religion. Narendra Modi, a former pracharak (worker) of the RSS was appointed Chief Minister of Gujarat in October 2001 and subsequently elected on the BJP ticket. He continued and intensified the discriminatory policies enforced from 1998 onwards. Indeed, between October 2001 and February 2002, the VHP openly organized Trishul Diksha Samarohs (lit. Trident Consecration Ceremonies) in the state. At these, communal passions were incited by raising anti-Muslim and anti-Christian slogans, distribution of trishuls (tridents) and guptis (daggers) and advocating violence against minorities. During the same period, October 2001 to February 2002, venomous pamphlets advocating the economic boycott and annihilation of the Muslim community were widely distributed, intending to and succeeding in creating a communal rift among people. In January 2002, the State Government issued a circular directing schools to conduct Hindu pujas (services), including the chanting of Sanskrit shlokas (religious verses) and lighting of diyas (lamps) to mark the anniversary of the earthquake in Bhuj, Gujarat. It also warned of adverse action if institutions did not follow the instructions. This circular was in breach of earlier High Court orders that prevented public institutions from following narrow political agendas. On 15 January 2002, the VHP announced mass mobilization in Gujarat for its Ayodhya agitation. This resulted in the movement of thousands of karsevaks (volunteers) from Gujarat to Ayodhya. On 7 February, the State Intelligence Bureau alerted all Superintendents and Commissioners of police in the State about the movement of karsevaks by train on 22 February 2002 to Ayodhya. The State Intelligence services had also repeatedly alerted the Uttar Pradesh (UP) State Police authorities about the number of karsevaks who had left the State for Ayodhya by train. Thus, if necessary,
Top Row 3rd from Right: Mohammed Aswat. Bottom Row from Left: Sakil Dawood, Saeed Dawood, Imran Dawood
I would like to go back to Gujarat. I would like to go back and hopefully make a change. Hopefully make a change and try to help people in bettering their lives. Giving them opportunities that they havent had. Maybe by doing this it will help me and help my family it will make me stronger. Basically I want to shed light rather than darkness in Gujarat.. Imran Dawood 2014
24
AWAAZ NETWORK
preventative action could have been taken against any incidence of violence when the karsevaks returned from Ayodhya. When the Ahmedabad-bound Sabarmati Express started its journey from Ayodhya it was carrying nearly 2000 passengers on board, almost double its capacity of 1,100. Nearly 1,700 people on board were karsevaks. The media and the press had reported instances of violence occurring in UP due to clashes between karsevaks and local persons on railway stations. This in itself should have been a cause for concern and ought to have alerted the State intelligence to take preventative measures. But no such measures were considered or implemented. On the 27th of February 2002 at about 8 am, the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express was burnt down, resulting in the tragic death of fifty-eight people, mostly Hindus, at Godhra railway station. The cause of the burning of the coach and consequent deaths is still to be judicially ascertained. However, there was no evidence that the burning of the carriage was premeditated. In fact, the local District Collector of Godhra, Jayanti Ravi, issued a statement, which was broadcast repeatedly from 8 am to 7 pm that day, to the effect that the Godhra fire was not pre-planned. In reality, despite the social media reportage of the incident, Gujarat was relatively peaceful until the evening of 27 February 2002. Narendra Modi and some of his cabinet colleagues arrived at Godhra at about 2 pm on 27 February 2002. Against the advice of the local administration, Modi took a decision to transport the charred bodies of the passengers of the Sabarmati Express to Ahmedabad. His initial plan was to not remove the bodies from the train but take the train with the dead bodies to the capital. However, to gain maximum publicity and media coverage, he and his colleagues decided to take the bodies in an open motor cavalcade to Ahmedabad. At about 7.30 pm that day, without any evidence to back it, Modi made a public broadcast in which he announced that ISI, the Pakistani intelligence agency, was behind the Godhra incident. He described Godhra as, a preplanned, violent act of terrorism. On the same day, in an interview, Praveen Togadia, International General Secretary of the VHP, stated this has never happened in the history of Independent India. Hindu society will avenge the Godhra killings. Muslims should accept the fact that Hindus are not wearing bangles. We will respond vigorously to all such incidents. The next day, Modi said on Doordarshan, the Indian state TV channel, Gujarat shall not tolerate any such incident. The culprits will get full punishment for their sins. Not only this, we will set an example that nobody, not even in his dreams, thinks of committing a heinous crime like this. The statements became the basis of a pogrom, of genocidal intent, against all Muslims in Gujarat. In order to facilitate the spreading of violence from Godhra to the rest of Gujarat and to paralyse the state machinery, the VHP called for state-wide bandh (closure of all shops and business and standstill of all public transport). Despite the fact that the courts have held bandhs to be illegal, Modi, in total defiance of his constitutional and legal duties, announced and promoted a Gujarat-wide bandh the next day. He would have known and foreseen that such action would lead to breakdown of the state
25
machinery and failure to maintain the rule of law. Indeed, all the reliable evidence suggests that Modi went further by calling two separate meetings about the official response: the first with his senior police officials and the second with senior Ministers. In both he allegedly gave specific instructions that resulted in the complete absence of police action and intervention against mobs unleashing wanton violence upon the Muslim community on 28 February 2002. Indeed central police control rooms were taken over by at least two cabinet members, Ashok Bhatt and I.K. Jadeja, in direct violation of normal procedure. As a consequence, repeated pleas for help were ignored or turned down by the police. This gross political interference was also used to monitor the response of police officers and to ensure the release of mob leaders and known supporters of the Sangh Parivar. Although the army was called in, it was deliberately not deployed for the first seventy-two hours - crucial hours when the violence and the pogrom against Muslims was at its height. Had the army been deployed properly, the threat of violence would have subsided. Even though the violence continued till May 2002 in various parts of the state, it was in the first seventy two hours that most damage was done and gross violence unleashed against an unprepared, vilified and vulnerable Muslim community. Muslims from all strata were targeted. Mobs, led by known leaders of the Sangh Parivar attacked Muslims and their properties to carry out what can only be described as ethnic cleansing. The leaders of the mobs had computerized sheets of names and addresses of Muslim homes and establishments. The Sangh Parivars involvement was confirmed in an interview with the President of the VHP, K.K. Shastri, who told the journalist, We were terribly angry over Godhra. Hindutva was attacked. This is a terrible outburst that will be difficult to roll back. And, we cant condemn it because they are our boys.
This carnage resulted in large-scale deaths, rapes, and grievous injury to the Muslim community. In addition, there was widespread destruction of their property, decimation of their places of worship and cultural symbols. It is estimated that across Gujarat over 1,100 Muslim owned hotels, homes of not less than 100,000 families, over 15,000 small and big establishments, around 3,000 hand carts, and over 5,000 vehicles were badly damaged or destroyed. At the end of the violence 2000 Muslims had died. None of the predominately Muslim residential areas and housing compounds, including Naroda Gaon and Naroda Patiya, Chamanpura, Gomtipur and Pandarwada were spared. Each district has a harrowing and barbaric story of injury, rape and murder to tell. In contrast to the speed with which he went to Godhra, Modi refused to visit any of the affected areas or relief camps. When he chose to comment on the violence, Modi cited Newtons Law of Motion: that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. (Zee TV, 1 March 2002). Far from adhering to his constitutional duty of preventing public anger or attacks on innocent people, Modi justified the violence as a natural reaction to the Godhra incident. In the same vein, the VHP Vice President, Giriraj Kishore told the Times of India, the violence during the bandh was a result of natural outpouring of anger and grief over the Godhra massacre.
26
AWAAZ NETWORK
The grinding slow wheels of the Indian judicial system can exhaust and demoralise even the most robust victims of heinous crimes. The six defendants suspected of the murders were last in court in 2012 but the verdicts are yet to be announced. The civil suit for damages against Narendra Modi and his senior officials seems to be travelling at an even slower pace, facing continuous legal and procedural blockages from defendants lawyers. None of this has deterred the Dawood family or its supporters in India and the UK. The Dawood family campaign continues to be fought from a different continent some five thousand miles away. In October 2012 after ten years of operating a policy of boycott against Modi the British Government decided to reengage with him and his state government. Given the public support for the Dawood campaign the British Government was forced to acknowledge its importance. Hugo Swire, Minister for India at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, was forced in October 2012 to state that, even as they were meeting with Modi, The UK has a broad range of interests in Gujarat. We want to secure justice for the families of the British nationals who were killed in 2002. We want to support human rights and good governance in the state. It would be wise to note that as a direct consequence of Narendra Modis role in the 2002 pogrom, the Indian Supreme Court described him as a modern day Nero. The United States had, denied him a visa in 2005 with the statement that, Chief Minister of Gujarat state Narendra Modi applied for, but was denied the diplomatic visa under section 212 (a) (2) (g) of the Act which makes any government official who was responsible for or directly carried out at any time, particularly severe violations of religious freedom, ineligible for visa. In February of this year, however, without any explanation for why their previous statement regarding the violations of religious freedom is void, the US government has also followed the UK in resuming engagement with Modi. To be a future Indian Prime Minister, Modi desperately requires a new international image. To this end, he has even engaged the services of a global public relations company. Together with big multinationals, the UK Government has decided to break ranks with the international communitys boycott of Modi for its narrow economic interests. In this way, it has assisted in the effort to rehabilitate, endorse and whitewash Modis image. The subsequent actions of the EU and US show that the effects of UKs change of stance have been significant. This despite the fact that there are still cases ongoing against Modi and only recently Maya Kodnani, a senior Minister in Modis cabinet, was sentenced to 28 years for her role in the massacre at Naroda Patiya during the 2002 violence. She was described by the judge as a Kingpin in incidents whose brutality is reflected in the murder of an infant, who was 20 days old. Human rights campaigners support trade and co-operation with Gujarat, but the current strategy of seeking to increase trade by helping with Modis international image is a form of political bribery and a wholly unacceptable strategy which tarnishes UKs own international image and contradicts the aspirations for good inter-community relations here in the UK. The Dawood family campaigns patient and determined struggle for justice stands in sharp contrast to the UK governments opportunistic embrace of Narendra Modi.
foUR
A Clean Chit? Has Narendra Modi been Absolved by the Supreme Court?
Prof. Gautam Appa, Professor Emeritus, London School of Economics and Savitri Hensman, Writer Summary
Narendra Modi stands accused of a number of actions that fomented the Gujarat riots of 2002. These relate both to irresponsible and inflammatory statements, as well as concrete actions (such as instructing the police not to interfere with Hindu attacks on Muslims). The case against Narendra Modi has never been argued before the Supreme Court of India (SC). So the question of a clean chit by the SC of India does not even arise. At present an appeal is being lodged in the Gujarat High Court to overturn the decision of a Guja rat Magistrates Court not to charge Modi for his role in the riots of 2002. The key case relates to the brutal massacre of Muslims in Gulberg Housing Society in Ahmed abad. Ehsan Jafri, an ex-MP and prominent Gujarat State Congress leader, was among those butchered by the mob. His widow, Zakia Jafri is one of the main parties bringing the case against Modi. The SC has, so far, seemed keen to ensure that all possibilities, including Modis culpability, can be thoroughly considered. The SC has ordered a number of actions to ensure an impartial process, including censuring the state government for their actions during the riots and moving cases relating to the riots to courts outside Gujarat. A Special Investigative Team (SIT) was appointed by the SC to look into the question of whether a criminal case could be made out against Modi in 2009. After reviewing its initial actions, SC ap pointed an amicus curiae Raju Ramachandran to look into the SITs operations. The amicus and SIT, both mere advisers to SC, have made opposing recommendations based on the same evidence. The SIT has suggested that there is insufficient evidence to proceed with a criminal case against Modi. Ramachandran has suggested that prima facie grounds for proceeding with a criminal case do exist.
The case against Modi in Indias courts is ongoing. To claim now that he has been given a clean chit is at best an attempt at obfuscation and at worst a cynical disregard of human rights viola tions.
28
AWAAZ NETWORK
Both Barry Gardiner and Shailesh Vara, chairs of the Labour and Tory friends of India respectively, have claimed that the Supreme Court of India (SC) has given a clean chit to Modi over his culpability for the riots in Gujarat in 2002. Nothing can be further from the truth. The first thing to note is that there has never been a case against Modi in the SC. Consequently, SC has never directly pronounced on his guilt or innocence. In this formal sense the question of a clean chit by the SC does not even arise! The matter has, so far, only been considered in lower courts. Furthermore, his escape from prosecution so far is based upon possibly insufficient evidence, not absence of evidence. The question being considered in Indian courts is whether there is prosecutable evidence against Modi to establish criminal liability for his role in the 2002 riots which claimed the lives of over 2000 people including three British citizens. The allegation is that he masterminded the riots, initially, by allowing charred bodies of 58 Hindu victims of the Godhra train fire to be paraded in the streets of Ahmedabad (the commercial capital of Gujarat) on 28 February 2002. He went on to support a Gujarat bandh (strike/closure) announced by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), a Hindu fundamentalist organisation. Furthermore, during a private meeting at his residence he asked senior police officers to not interfere if Hindus sought revenge and had two cabinet colleagues placed in the central police control rooms to ensure compliance. Finally, he prevented the army from intervening for three days. The case going through the lower courts in Gujarat at the moment has been brought by Zakia Jafri, the widow of Ehsan Jafri a former MP and State Congress party member living in Gulberg Housing Society in Ahmedabad. The massacre at Gulberg Housing Society is one of the most gruesome incidents of the riots of 2002. As news of the slaughter of Muslims following the Godhra train fire started trickling through in Ahmedabad on 28 February, scores of frightened Muslim neighbours gathered for safety in the home of Ehsan Jafri believing that he would have the connections to be able to ensure the safety of those around him. As a violent mob advanced on the Gulberg Society, repeated phone calls were made to police and political authorities in Ahmedabad, in Delhi, and even to Modi himself - pleading for help. None came, even though police were present in the area. Eventually Ehsan Jafri and 68 others were massacred, many of them burnt alive. According to eye witnesses Jafris severed head was hoisted on a trident. Zakia Jafri set out to bring to account those she believed were responsible for her husbands death. In India, when police are told that a crime has been committed, they are required to write up a First Information Report (FIR). In 2006, she made a complaint that the police had refused to register FIRs against Narendra Modi and others in the Gujarat government for allegedly allowing the massacre. In 2008, the SC intervened, ordering that the Gulberg Society case and several others relating to killings in Gujarat in 2002 be re-investigated. A Special Investigation Team (SIT) was set up under RK Raghavan, a former head of Indias Central Bureau of Investigation, and was tasked by the SC with probing the alleged involvement of Narendra Modi.
29
This investigation ran into problems. In 2010 the special public prosecutor working with SIT, RK Shah, resigned because he found it too difficult. He was reported as explaining: Here I am collecting witnesses who know something about a gruesome case in which so many people, mostly women and children huddled in Jafris house, were killed and I get no cooperation. The SIT officers are unsympathetic towards witnesses, they try to browbeat them and dont share evidence with the prosecution as they are supposed to do.1 By the end of 2010 SIT had submitted three interim reports. In November 2010, in order that a second opinion on the evidence collected by SIT be available, SC appointed an amicus curiae (literally friend of the court) experienced advocate Raju Ramachandran to take a critical look at its findings. When the final reports of the SIT and the amicus curiae were submitted in 2012, it became apparent that there was a major difference of opinion. SIT concluded that there was no reliable material available to prove that Modi had issued any instructions to the senior police officers on 27th Feb, 2002 to the effect that Hindus should be permitted to vent their anger. Ramachandran disagreed. The main point of contention was whether to believe the testimony of Sanjiv Bhatt, a serving officer in the Indian Police Services (IPS) cadre of the State of Gujarat, who had stated that he was present at the said meeting and the Chief Minister Modi had made such statement. For various reasons SIT decided that Bhatts testimony was not reliable. In its absence, SIT concluded, there was not enough prosecutable evidence to proceed against Modi. Ramachandran took the view that it would not be correct to disbelieve Bhatt at this prima facie stage and that Bhatt should be cross-examined in a trial to determine whether he is telling the truth or not. It is important to note that both the SIT and the Amicus Curiae have only an advisory role; neither conveys the view of the SC nor has any binding effect. Had the SIT concluded that there was prosecutable evidence against Modi, it would not have meant that Modi was guilty. At best it would have made his prosecution more likely.
Someone else is driving a car and were sitting behind, even then if a puppy comes under the wheel, will it be painful or not? Narendra Modi on whether he regrets the Gujarat riots, July 2013
http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?264745
AWAAZ NETWORK
30
SIT sought to close the case in July 2013, leading Modi and his supporters to claim that SC had given him a clean chit. But SC thought otherwise. It ordered that Zakia Jafri should be heard before the final decision. She filed a protest petition because SIT had ignored this order. Even though the petition was due for hearing in a Magistrates court, Gardiner and Vara declared in August 2013 that Modi had been given a clean chit by the SC. They were wrong! On 26 December the Magistrates Court decided that SIT had come to the right conclusion and Modi should not be chargesheeted. Once again Modi and his supporters distorted the outcome to pronounce Satyamev Jayate, i.e., truth had triumphed - he had been given a clean chit. But there is no closure yet for Modi. An appeal against the verdict of the Magistrates Court is being filed in the Gujarat High Court. Zakia Jafri, in her appeal has argued that there is strong evidence against Modi, that the SIT has ignored its own evidence and that the report of the Amicus Curiae, Ramchandran, was groundlessly rejected in the Magistrates court. Eventually the appeal will reach the SC which will decide whether a case should go ahead under the then existing criminal law in India. Until then claims of a clean chit being handed to Modi by SC have no factual basis whatsoever.
So what has the SC actually said about Modi and the Gujarat riots of 2002? All indications are that the SC has gone out of its way to prevent the ruling out of his culpability in the 2002 genocide of Muslims in Gujarat. It has: halted the trials in 9 major riot cases and moved them outside the state. declared his government modern-day Neros, looking elsewhere when innocent children and helpless women were burning. appointed a SIT to probe the question of Modis guilt. appointed an Amicus Curiae to probe SITs initial non-committal conclusion.
In addition: V N Khare, a former chief justice of the SC, has said in an open court that I would have lodged an FIR against Narendra Modi on charges of genocide and manslaughter.2
See more at: http://www.hardnewsmedia.com/2012/02/4566#sthash.gXypOxc0.dpuf
31
The Gujarat Government had responded to the violence more swiftly and decisively than ever done before in any previous riots in the country. Narendra Modi after a Gujarat Magistrates court accepted SIT report December 2013
An investigation carried out by a Citizens Tribunal, under the chairmanship of Justice Krishna Iyer (a former SC judge), had recorded Haren Pandya, Home Minister of Gujarat in 2002, stating that Modi called a meeting on the night of February 27, hours after the Godhra train attack. At this meeting, he directed the police to give free rein to the Hindus to act as they would. Pandya made his deposition to Justice H Suresh, a retired Bombay High Court judge and Justice PB Sawant, a former Supreme Court judge, on May 13, 2002. Pandya was murdered on March 26, 2003. In a newspaper article in The Hindu of 15 Feb 2013, Markandey Katju, a former SC judge, declares: It is said by his supporters that Mr. Modi had no hand in the killings, and it is also said that he had not been found guilty by any court of law. I do not want to comment on our judiciary, but I certainly do not buy the story that Mr. Modi had no hand in the events of 2002. He was the Chief Minister of Gujarat at the time when horrible events happened on such a large scale. Can it be believed that he had no hand in them?3 A final point may be suggested. All that has been said so far relates to the strictly legal aspects of the case against Modi. It is important to maintain a distinction between moral failure and legal culpability. In India, as elsewhere,the level of proof required for a criminal conviction and difficulty of persuading witnesses to give evidence which might put them at risk means that powerfulpeople are seldom convicted. The fact that aSupreme Courtappointed legal expert thinks there might be strong enough evidenceto go to trial in this case is in itself remarkable. At the very least Modi presided over a situation when over 2000 people, overwhelmingly Muslims, were targeted and murdered. His actions since then have ignored the need for rehabilitation and, in fact, consistently increased the levels of alienation and marginalisation of the victims of the riots. At least one minister of his cabinet has been convicted of participating in the riots. Modis moral responsibility is manifest. We conclude by asserting that the claim that that the SC has given a clean chit to Modi is at best an attempt at obfuscation and at worst a cynical disregard of human rights violations.
see http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/all-the-perfumes-of-arabia/article4415539.ece
AWAAZ NETWORK
32
33
fIVE
Violence and Control: Modi, Hindutva and Women

Pragna Patel, Director, Southall Black Sisters
Summary
During the 2002 genocide, violence against women and children was deployed in a systematic and widespread fashion. Womens bodies were made the grounds on which to symbolise the subjugation of the Muslim population. Independent observers from India and elsewhere have taken note of the particular and unprecedented role of sexualised and non-sexualised forms of violence against women in the Gujarat genocide of 2002. Modis administration did nothing to prevent the rape and violence. In many instances, the police and prominent figures within Modis administration were complicit in such acts. In the immediate aftermath of the genocide, Modis administration did nothing to rehabilitate or provide long-term support to survivors of sexual violence. Modis administration did nothing to facilitate prosecutions of the perpetrators of sexual violence. On the contrary, it has consistently obstructed the investigations and attempts to bring to justice those responsible. The Supreme Court of India has upbraided the Gujarat Government for this. The Sangh Parivar has a misogynistic and patriarchal view of women; they are considered to be subordinate and inferior to men. Women are infantalised and confined to very strict gender roles which perpetuate inequality and discrimination. The Sangh Parivar has a militaristic and aggressive conception of Hindu masculinity. Sexualised violence and the control of women are central aspects in the construction of this masculinity and the Sangh Parivar ideology. In his statements and practice, Modi has shown that he is formed by and fundamentally agrees with the Sangh Parivars ideology. The position of women as a whole in Modis Gujarat has been poor and is deteriorating when viewed from a range of critical development and equality criteria. The position of women from minority and marginalised communities Muslim, tribals and dalits is worse.
34
AWAAZ NETWORK
I have never known a riot which has used the sexual subjugation of women so widely as an instrument of violence as the recent mass barbarity in Gujarat1 Girls and womens bodies were subjected to almost inexhaustible violence, with infinitely plural and innovative forms of torture Rape and Violence against women as an instrument of subjugation It is now well established that between 28 February and 2 March 2002, the Gujarat State, its police and politicians directly participated in or stood by and watched Hindu rioters and mobs loot and burn down Muslim-owned property and kill, torture, rape and mutilate 2,000, mainly Muslim, men, women and children. There is considerable evidence to show that during the Gujarat genocide,1 whilst Hindu slogans were chanted, Muslim women and girls in large numbers were systematically raped and then torched to death. Mass graves have revealed the mutilated bodies of Muslim women. Testimonies from survivors in refugee camps also describe how women and young girls were gang-raped, paraded naked in public, had instruments inserted into their bodies, were subjected to sexual assaults, had their breasts cut off, their vaginas and wombs sliced open and were beaten up with rods and pipes. Pregnant women were cut open and foetuses hung up on three-pronged trishuls (tridents that serve a symbolic Hindu religious function). In one case, several eyewitnesses testified that a pregnant woman was raped, tortured and her womb then slit open with a sword to disgorge the foetus, which was then hacked to pieces and burned with the mother. In another case a 3 year old girl was raped and killed in front of her mother.2 Many women victims of gang rape and other sexual assault were burnt whilst still alive. The burning of victims had the effect of depriving their families of the opportunity of burying them in accordance with Muslim burial rituals. By burning the victims, Hindu mobs sought to enforce a cultural form of disposing of the dead and to annihilate their culture and identity. Children of victims were also severely affected and traumatised by the violence. They were attacked while going to school, and many were intimidated and threatened when trying to resume their studies.3 In mid2002 at least 33,000 children, many of them orphans, were living in relief camps following the violence.4 That such violence against women was unleashed is not surprising given that the Sangh Parivar5 in Gujarat
According to independent human rights observers, the events that transpired in Gujarat between February 28 and March 02 conform to the specifications of genocide under the Second Article of the Genocide Convention of 1948 adopted by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on December 09 1948, Genocide in Gujarat: The Sangh Parivar, Narendra Modi and the Government of Gujarat, Coalition Against Genocide, March 02 2005. Available online at http://www.coalitionagainstgenocide.org/reports.php Justice, the victim, op cit. See also, We Have No Orders to Save You: State Participation and Complicity in Communal Violence in Gujarat, Human Rights Watch, April 2002 (http://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/india/). Crime Against Humanity, Vol. II, pp. 38-43 and various testimonies and evidence in Vol. I, Concerned Citizens Tribunal (http://www.sabrang.com/tribunal/ ).
3 The Next Generation: In the Wake of the Genocide: A Report on the Impact of the Gujarat Pogrom on Children and the Young , Citizens Initiative Ahmedabad, July 2002 (http://www.coalitionagainstgenocide.org/reports.php) 4 Crime Against Humanity, Vol II, Concerned Citizens Tribunal, p. 39 5 Sangh Parivar refers to a family of extremist Hindu organisations presided over by Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). It includes the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), Bajrang Dal and, in the UK, the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh (see Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar). They have been involved in violence against Muslims and Christians in India.
35
and elsewhere regularly puts out propaganda exhorting their members to defile, violate, and destroy women and girls from the minority community, who are seen as the main reproducers of Muslim and Christian religion and culture. For example, calls to rape Muslim women and girls were contained in a pamphlet produced by the VHP and RSS and distributed in Ahmedabad months before the violence started.6 As the pamphlets indicate, womens bodies were turned into battlefields in order to perpetrate hate and subjugate the whole Muslim community. A unique feature of the genocide in 2002 was that many Hindu women actively participated in, encouraged and even instigated the violence. Eyewitnesses have named several prominent women who took part in the violence including Maya Kodnani, an activist of the BJP, Modis political party. Kodnani was made Minister for Women and Child Development in the Gujarat government by Modi in 2007 even though he knew of her direct involvement in the genocide. She was eventually convicted of murder and conspiracy to commit murder and sentenced to 28 years in prison.7 Modis endorsement of her led commentators to wryly observe that they now know what the Gujarat Model of development means. Modi and the lack of state accountability The International Initiative for Justice in Gujarat and Amnesty Internationals Stop Violence Against Women Report on Gujarat are some amongst many that have criticized the failure of Modis government to acknowledge and prevent the widespread sexual victimization of women or to provide adequate support and compensation in its aftermath.8 Human rights observers have noted that there has been a blatant disregard for the rule of law at every level of state government.9
6 7 Justice, the victim, op. cit. Ch. 6. Clear evidence has emerged in respect of the direct involvement of Maya Kodnani in the communal violence. According to testimony backed by mobile phone records, she was present at a particularly gruesome incident of violence. Witnesses testified that she was distributing swords to Hindu rioters, exhorting them to attack Muslims, and at one point fired a pistol. Over 95 people were killed on that occasion, including women and children. See Reuters report available at http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/08/31/maya-kodnani-gujarat-verdict-idINDEE87U07P20120831. Amnesty International has released reports in 2007 and 2012 highlighting the inaction and failures of the Modi-led Gujarat Government with regards to both prosecution of those guilty in 2002 and rehabilitation of those affected. India: Five years on - the bitter and uphill struggle for justice in Gujarat, March 2007 (http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA20/007/2007/en) and India: A decade on from the Gujarat riots, an overwhelming majority of victims await justice in India, February 2012 (http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA20/006/2012/en). For example the High Court in Gujarat closed the case of Bilkis Bano involving gang rape and the massacre of 14 family members. The blatant disregard for the rule of law led the Supreme Court to
You go to villages and forests of the country and there will be no such incidents of gang-rape or sex crimes. They are prevalent in some urban belts. The Indian ethos and attitude towards women should be revisited in the context of ancient Indian values. Mohan Bhagwat, Sarsangchalak (Supreme Leader) of RSS, January 2013
36
AWAAZ NETWORK
The following are some of the key failures that have been identified by Amnesty International:10 The Gujarat government failed to curb the hate speech and inflammatory media and government propaganda in Gujarat which fuelled the violence and rapes (62-64); The Gujarat police failed to protect women or arrest perpetrators of violence against women and girls (23-26); The Gujarat police failed to register rape and sexual abuse charges and failed to investigate or collect medical evidence of rape and abuse (28-40); The Gujarat trial courts failed to ensure justice for victims of rape and violence and instead frustrated attempts by victims to obtain a fair hearing at every level (40-51); The Gujarat government failed to provide support, counselling and rehabilitation relief to victims of rape and sexual violence, despite the fact that the physical, psychological and financial consequence of such experiences will haunt them for many years and, for a significant number of women, for the rest of their lives (52-54); The Gujarat government showed reluctance to cooperate with the judiciary and National Human Rights Commission. It resisted public scrutiny by intimidating witnesses and human rights activists who are campaigning for justice.11 In sum, impunity for violence against women was part of the systemic discrimination that women suffered before, during and after widespread violence. The sexual politics of Modi and the Sangh Parivar Since 2012, India has been rocked by a series of high profile gang rape cases that have highlighted the overall failure of the Indian state to provide women greater security, equality and justice. Modi and his Sangh Parivar allies continue to display a profoundly arrogant and misogynist approach to womens rights. Indeed they view sexual violence as an inherent and intrinsic part of the Sangh Parivar project.12 Chillingly, the incitement to sexual violence is seen as a means of proving the masculinity of the Hindu man.13 They continue to see women not as fully fledged human beings with the inalienable right to exercise their own free will and choice but as vehicles for the expression of community honour and identity.14
direct the Central Bureau of Investigation to take over the case and transferred it to a special court in Mumbai so that it could be heard outside Gujarat. In the Best Bakery Case, the High Court in Gujarat failed to use its powers to direct and oversee the trial court process and investigative procedures. This and other failures led the Supreme Court in 2004 to rebuke the State government and Gujarat High Court while ordering the case transferred to neighbouring Maharashtra. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2004-04-15/ahmedabad/28324789_1_gujarat-high-court-affidavits-judgment 10 All these are documented in Justice, the victim. Figures in brackets indicate the page number of that report. The 2012 follow-up statement by Amnesty International - India: A decade on from the Gujarat riots - points out that these aspects have still not been addressed. 11 Discouraging Dissent: Intimidation and Harassment of Witnesses, Human Rights Activists and Lawyers Pursing Accountability for the 2002 Communal Violence in Gujara t, Human Rights Watch 12 Threatened Existence: A Feminist Analysis of the Genocide in Gujarat, The International Initiative for Justice in Gujarat, 2003 13 An interim Report, The International Initiative for Justice in Gujarat, 19 December 2002. 14 In the lead up to the recent communal riots in Uttar Pradesh, a key battleground in the upcoming general elections, the Sangh Parivars propagation of falsehoods about a love jihad plot by Muslims to woo and convert Hindu girls and the consequent need to violently protect community honour was
37
For example, the Sangh Parivar has supported the practice of sati and has publicly supported campaigns against choice in marriage.15 Modi subscribes to the Sangh Parivars patriarchal view of women as the property of their father, husbands or sons.16 As a member of the RSS, he supports their goal to replace the legal and constitutional rights of women in India with the Hindu law of Manu which teaches that women are subordinate to men from cradle to grave. Recently, for example, the Modi government was caught in a major political scandal involving the use of state resources to place a young woman under surveillance at the behest of her father without her consent.17 As has been discussed elsewhere, the Human Development Indicators for Gujarat give lie to the illusion of an economic miracle (see Dont Believe the Hype: Modis Model of Governance). Modi has, in fact, presided over a state in which the position of women from all communities, especially in rural areas, have fallen behind those of many other states in India. The position of Muslim and other marginalised women has deteriorated even further. Between 2011 and 2012 the sex ratio of women per 1,000 men in Gujarat worsened from 920 to 918 (way below the national average of 940).18 Gujarat has one of the lowest conviction rates in crimes against women even though the rate of crimes has increased year after year.19 69.7% of children up to the age of 5 are anaemic and 44.6% malnourished.20 Female suicide rates in Gujarat showed a 10.5% increase in 2007 compared to the All India increase of 2.2%.21
one of the factors inciting clashes. http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/muzaffarnagar-love-jihad-beef-bogey-sparked-riotflames/article1-1120889.aspx 15 The Sexual Politics of Modi, the BJP and the Sangh Parivar India United Against Fascism 28 October 2013 16 The chief of the RSS Mohan Bhagwat recently stated at a public rally that, A husband and wife are involved in a contract under which the husband has said that you should take care of my house and I will take care of all your needs. I will keep you safe. http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/woman-is-bound-by-contract-to-look-after-husband-bhagwat/1055559/ 17 India United Against Fascism, India Snoopgate and the Gujarat Model of Governance 9 December 2013 (www.sacw.net/article6832. html). 18 While most of the states in the country had an upward trend in dealing with Indias abysmal sex ratios, Gujarat is one of the three Indian states, besides Bihar and Jammu & Kashmir, which have a downward trend. See Pratik Sinha Does RSS want women to become baby making machines? November 15, 2013 http://www.truthofgujarat.com/rss-want-women-become-baby-making-machines/ 19 http://www.truthofgujarat.com/gujarats-abysmally-low-conviction-rates-crime-women-women-gujarat-get-justice/ 20 Chandhoke, N. Modis Gujarat and its little Illusion. Economic and Political weekly. Vol XL VII, No. 49 (2012) 21 http://www.deccanherald.com/content/325239/in-reality-modi-does-not.html
38
AWAAZ NETWORK
Conclusion Modis true legacy in Gujarat is one of hatred, violence and divisiveness. Much as Modi and his supporters might try to manipulate his public image, they cannot hide his record as a Hindu supremacist whose profoundly patriarchal values underlie his continuing lack of remorse and compassion for those killed, raped and displaced. As Chief Minister of Gujarat, he cannot abdicate moral and political responsibility (even if he attempts to avoid legal responsibility) for what happened under his watch in 2002. Modi has failed to uphold the constitution of India and the standard of due diligence under national and international laws and obligations to prevent grave human rights abuses. Overwhelming evidence shows that Modi has abused his power by using a combination of violence and terror tactics to destroy democracy and the rule of law. His model of governance has been described as that of a near fascist dictatorship.22 For this reason he is not fit for public office or for a place on the international stage as a world statesman.
22 India United Against Fascism, India Snoopgate and the Gujarat Model of Governance, 9 December 2013 (www.sacw.net/article6832.html).
39
SIX
Dont Believe the Hype: Modis Model of Governance

Prof. Gautam Appa, Emeritus Professor, London School of Economics
Narendra Modi has been given undue credit as solely and uniquely responsible for the high level of growth in Gujarat. On many indicators where India is amongst the worst-off in worldwide comparisons, Gujarat is nowhere near the top. In terms of gender imbalance, it is below the all India average and even below China. There are also other indicators on which Gujarat compares unfavourably with other Indian states. Among these are the percentage of undernourished children, child sex ratio, percentage of households with toilets and women with severe anaemia. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has pointed to numerous instances where the Gujarat government has avoided proper procedure and foregone significant amounts of revenue, instead showering undue benefits on some of the largest industrial houses of India the Ambanis, Tatas, Birlas and Adani. The findings of the CAG and rulings of the Gujarat High Court point to significant amounts of corruption among ministers of the Gujarat government. A serving minister in Modis government has been imprisoned for illegal mining while another serving minister has been charged with the murder of a human rights activist who brought a case against him for illegal mining. The excellent growth rates achieved by Gujarat ought not to be attributed to Modi alone. Gujarat has historically had large entrepreneurial communities and was already achieving high growth rates before Modi was made Chief Minister. Gujarat has significant achievements in terms of the percentage of households with electricity, the percentage of government schools with electricity, the murder rate and the number of households owning two-wheelers. Gujarat leads the country on a number of other counts: mob violence against Muslims and the number of ministers and senior police officers imprisoned for murder of innocent Muslims Vapi, an industrial town in South Gujarat, has been declared the most polluted city in India.
40
AWAAZ NETWORK
We should all hope that chief minister Narendra Modi soon becomes the PM of India says Basant Kumar Birla, the patriarch of Birla Group of companies.1 And he is not alone. Mukesh Ambani, chairman of Reliance Industries, called Modi a leader with a grand vision, while his otherwise estranged brother Anil Ambani called him a king among kings.2 A well-orchestrated campaign is underway to portray Modi as a miracle worker. He is made out to be responsible for high level of overall growth as well as a non-corrupt, non-bureaucratic and efficient administration delivering better education, health and wealth for Gujarat. Above all he is promoted by Indias leading industrial dynasties (Tatas, Birlas, Ambanis, Mittals and Adanis among them), and the media outlets they control, as the only one capable of delivering on all these fronts and hence the best future Prime Minister of India. This is an utterly imbalanced view of the impact of 13 years of Modis reign in Gujarat. We shall show that: 1. On some key welfare indicators, where India is near the bottom of world league tables, Gujarat is not even the best in India and sometimes below the all-India level. 2. On many other key indicators of welfare Gujarat ranks well below other states of India. 3. There are serious corruption charges against Modis Government evinced by: (a) The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) (b) The Gujarat High Court (c) Corruption cases against serving ministers 4 Gujarat under Modi has outperformed other states of India in the following: (a) GDP growth and some related indicators (b) Mob violence against minorities (c) The number of ministers and senior police officers jailed for killing innocent Muslims (d) Being home to the most polluted industrial area in India We now elaborate on these four points. 1. Gujarat near the bottom where India is also near the bottom Based on the World Development Indicators (available from data.worldbank.org) and the Census of India, Nobel prize-winning economist Amartya Sen and Jean Dreze have provided comprehensive statistical evidence about development in India in their recent book An Uncertain Glory India and its Contradictions. They compare India with 7 other South East Asian countries (Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, China, South Korea, Indonesia and Thailand) and also the 21 states of India with each other. Table 1, extracted from their work, shows some key welfare indicators where India is known to be at the bottom of world comparisons. Has Modi performed any miracle cures on these counts? On the contrary, the data suggests that the gender imbalance is worse in Gujarat than the all-India average (and also worse than
1 2
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-bk-birla-joins-modi-for-pm-chorus-1302005 http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/narendra-modi-a-king-among-kings-says-anil-ambani-at-vibrant-gujarat-summit-316076
41
China). Only four out of 21 Indian states perform worse than Gujarat in this regard. On a number of other counts female literacy rate, infant mortality rate and multi-dimensional poverty (a robust new measure of poverty levels) there are between 7 and 10 states of India doing better. Not the rosy picture, then, suggested by the hype surrounding Modis record! Table 1 Gujarats poor performance where India is at the bottom of league tables3 Indicators Gujarat Gujarat rank All-India Indias rank Remarks figure out of 21 average out of 8 states countries Females per 918 16th 937 7th China 926 1000 males (2011) Kerala 1,084 Female literacy rate 70.7 9th 65.5 6th Kerala best (2011) at 92% Infant mortality per 41 Joint 11th 44 7th Kerala best 1000 live births (2011) at 12 % multi-dimensionally 41 8th 53.7 7th Kerala best Poor (2005-06) at 12.7
2. Gujarat near the bottom again Table 2 gives a list of key welfare indicators where Gujarat compares very unfavourably with other states of India. In all the indicators below, Gujarats performance is also below the national average. In 2005-06, after 6 years of Modis rule, the percentage of households with toilet facilities was only 43.5, well below the shameful all-india figure of 49.3%. Again in 2005-06, 16 states of India performed better in terms of the percentage of undernourished children below age 5 and 14 states did better in terms of the percentage of women with anaemia. When asked about this Modi blamed body-image issues among girls!4 The position of women under Modis rule is abysmal. While we saw above that in 2011 the overall gender imbalance in Gujarat was worse than the all-India levels or even China, the reality on the ground is far worse than that because there were only 886 girls per 1000 boys under the age of 6.
3 4
Source: Dreze and Sen, An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/narendra-modi-under-fire-for-attributing-malnutrition-in-gujarat-to-beauty-conscious-young-girls-260834
AWAAZ NETWORK
42
Table 2 Gujarats poor performance on other key measures5 Indicators Gujarat Gujarats All-India Remarks figure rank average Out of 21 states % Undernourished children 44.6 17th 42.5 Modi blames dieting (weight for age) below age 5 (2005-06) Girls per 1000 boys 886 15th 914 Worse than 0 to 6 years (2011) all-India average % of households with 43.5 12th 49.3 Worse than toilet facilities (2005-06) all-India average % women aged 15-49 19.1 18th 16.8 Modi blames dieting with moderate or severe anaemia (2005-06)
3.
Corruption in Gujarat
(a) 2012 CAG report finds massive corruption in Gujarat The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India is a statutory body independent of the government or any other state agency.6 In its 2012 report on Gujarat, CAG recognised some achievements of the Gujarat government, such as the high revenue and profits made by Gujarat public sector units. However, it also found a Rs 16,000 crore (Rs. 160 billion = 1.5 billion) hole in the states finances due to what can only be described as corrupt practices. The CAG report provides a long list of hand-outs to favoured industrial houses. These take the form of allocating projects without a proper bidding process, selling off public land and electricity at prices far below market value, allowing illegal permits and exemptions etc. Here are some typical examples.7 The Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation (GSPC) purchased gas at spot prices but sold it at a lower price to Adani Energy, resulting in additional undue benefit of Rs. 70.54 crore (Rs. 705 million = 7.05 million). Mukesh Ambanis Reliance Industries was allowed to install a platform in the Krishna-Godavari (KG) Block of GSPC without formal permission, making GPSC responsible for the structure for life. Due to bids for KG block being submitted without proper assessment of technical and financial issues, the actual drilling cost incurred was $1.3 billion (784 million), i.e. over 12 times higher than the original estimated exploration cost of $102.2 million (61.5 million). CAG found GSPC subsidiary Gujarat State Petronet Limited to have passed on undue benefits of Rs 12.02 crore (Rs. 120 million = 1.2 million) to Essar Steel by waiving capacity charges contrary to the provisions of the gas transmission agreement.
Source: Dreze and Sen, An Uncertain Glory. For instance, among its noteworthy exposes is the so-called Coalgate, a political scandal concerning the Indian governments allocation of the nations coal deposits to public sector entities and private companies by the current Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. CAG report available at http://saiindia.gov.in/english/home/Our_Products/Audit_Report/Government_Wise/state_audit/recent_reports/Gujarat/2011/ Commercial/Commercial.html
5 6 7
43
The biggest story of corruption is Modi governments deal with Tata Motors.8 It shows that Gujarat government agreed to a loan of Rs. 9,500 crores (Rs. 95 billion = 950 million) to Tata Motors at an interest rate of 0.1%. Tatas investment in the plant in Gujarat is only Rs. 2,000 crores (Rs. 20 billion = 200 million). Once again these are not the only examples of corrupt practices favouring the big industrial dynasties of India. Is it any wonder that all the major industrial houses are plumping for Modi as the next Prime Minister or that Modi flies around in the private jet planes of Tata or Ambani or Adani? (b) The Gujarat High Courts verdicts on illegal practices of Gujarat government The following examples of ministerial decisions of the Gujarat government that were overruled by the Gujarat High Court are in no way unique to Gujarat. Similar things happen all over India and did happen under the previous Congress government in Gujarat. What the examples illustrate is the fact that the claim of Modi running a non-corrupt, squeaky clean administration is a lie. Allotment of fishing rights in reservoirs of various dams without Auction In the year 2008, the Agriculture and Fisheries Minister Purushottam Solanki decided to give fishing rights at the 38 dams in Gujarat, without auction, to groups and individuals that he favoured. The loss to the Gujarat exchequer was estimated at Rs. 400 crore (Rs. 4 billion = 40 million). However, Modi did not see it fit to remove Mr. Solanki from his cabinet.9 Allowing the Adani Group to operate without environmental clearance In January 2014 the Gujarat High Court ordered the immediate shutdown of all activities of 12 units of the Adani Port Special Economic Zone (APSEZ) at Mundra as the Adanis had not obtained environmental clearance under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification 2006.
Modi with business tycoon, Mukesh Ambani by NarendraModiofficial
Gujarat is by and large a vegetarian state. And secondly, Gujarat is also a middle-class state. The middle-class is more beauty conscious than health conscious that is a challenge. If a mother tells her daughter to have milk, theyll have a fight. Shell tell her mother, I wont drink milk. Ill get fat. Narendra Modi when asked about persistent malnutrition in Gujarat, August 2012
8 9
The details of this deal were leaked in 2008. http://ibnlive.in.com/news/modis-offer-for-nano-rs9570-cr-soft-loan/77974-7.html http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-cbi-probe-sought-in-rs400-crore-fisheries-scam-ingujarat-1786107
44
AWAAZ NETWORK
The High Court heard a Public Interest suit filed by the farmers of the Navinal village and rejected the Adani Groups contention that clearance should be deemed to have been received. It observed that APSEZ had blatantly violated the environmental norms.10 c) Corruption cases against ministers Dinu Solanki, a BJP MP close to Modis right hand man Amit Shah, was charged by the Central Bureau of Investigation in Dec. 2013 for the murder of Right to Information activist Amit Jethwa who had filed a Public Interest Litigation case against Solanki for illegal mining.11 Gujarat Water Resources Minister Babu Bokhiria was sentenced in June 2013 to 3 years imprisonment for illegal mining of lime stone in 2006. Modi made him a minister while the case was ongoing.12 Gujarat is not unique in this respect. Criminals enter politics all over India and most parties have their share of them. However, these examples show clearly that the Modi-run government is no different. 4. (a) cators Where Gujarat Excels Excellent record in GDP growth and some related indi
He [Modi] could have first of all been more secular and he could have made the minority community feel more secure I dont think the record is very good. I think I dont have to be a member of the minority in order to feel insecure We Indians dont want a situation where the minority feel insecure and could legitimately think that there was an organised violence against them in 2002. I think that is a terrible record and I dont think Indian prime minister as an Indian citizen Of who has that kind of record. No, I do not. Amartya Sen, Nobel Prize Winner for Economics, July 2013
Sen and Drezes book does contain evidence of areas where Gujarats has performed well under Modis rule. Table 3 lists the most important ones.
10 http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/gujarat-high-court-orders-shut-down-12-manufacturing-units-mundra-sez 11 http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/rti-activist-amit-jethwa-murder-case-bjp-leaderdinu-solanki-named-in-cbi-chargesheet-461541 12 http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-06-15/india/39992651_1_illegalmining-case-gujarat-minister-porbandar
45
The figure cited most often by promoters of Modi is the average growth rate of GDP from 2001-11 (the period of his chief ministership of Gujarat). At 8.2% it is the highest among all 21 states. They consider it positive proof of his administrative capability and grand vision. However, It is unclear how much of this is due to Modis great administrative skills. For instance, Gujarat had one of the highest rates of growth even in the years before his administration.13 Gujarats entrepreneurial class of Baniyas, Patels and Bohras have a long history of prosperous commerce. Other states have done at least as well, if not better. Rates of growth in Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu at 7.5% are not far behind and, though not as large a state, Himachal Pradesh has had a better growth rate at 10%. But no one gives credit to their chief ministers. In fact Tamil Nadu does better in terms of several socio-economic indicators and Kerala, with 7% GDP growth over this period, is the best on most social indicators. In recent times, with a growth rate of close to 15 per cent, historically poor Bihar has also outstripped Gujarat. Nigeria has a high growth rate but no one in their right mind would call Nigeria a model of good administration. Can good administration atone for Modis record on dealing with minorities? Didnt Mussolini make the trains run on time?
As is evident from Dreze and Sens data, there are other areas in which Gujarat is doing well. It has the highest percentage of government schools with electricity; there are only five states with a higher percentage of households with electricity; it is no. 2 on both the murder rate and the percentage of households owning two-wheelers.
13 http://www.rediff.com/business/column/modis-myths-about-gujarats-growth-and-other-hype-column/20120711.htm
46
AWAAZ NETWORK
Indicator
Growth rate of State GDP (2001-11) % of govt schools with electricity (200910) % of households with electricity (2005-06) Murder rate Per 100,000 (2010) % of households Owning 2 wheelers
Table 3 where Gujarat excels14 Gujarat figure Gujarats rank All-India Remarks Out of 21 figure states 8.2% 2st 6% Most favourable figure for Modi 94 1st 31.4
89.3 1.7
6th 2nd
67.9 2.8
34.1
2nd
21
Joint 6th with Karnataka Jointly with two other states. Only Kerala better at 1.1 Only Punjab better at 47.5
While there are caveats to the success story of Gujarat outlined in table 3, there are things achieved under the Modi government that indisputably surpass all other states. We take these up next. (b) Gujarat leads in unleashing murder and repression on minorities Modi has been in power in Gujarat since 2001. From 2001 to date no other state of India even comes close to matching Gujarats record of mob violence against Muslims in 2002. Within three days of the burning of a train coach at Godhra station (See Narendra Modis Culpability in the Gujarat Genocide: A Factsheet) more than 2,000 people, largely Muslim, were killed. Many, such as the three British Muslims were burnt alive. Muslim women were assaulted, gang raped and tortured (See Violence and Control: Modi, the Sangh Parivar and Women). More than 200,000 Muslims were made homeless and many still languish in makeshift accommodation without any compensation or even recognition of their existence. India has seen many bloody communal riots, some even bloodier. But not since 2001. What Gujarat achieved under Modis rule has not been surpassed. (c) Ministers and senior police officers imprisoned for murder of innocent Muslims
Ministers Dr. Maya Kodnani, appointed Minister for Chid Development by Modi in 2007, was convicted of orchestrating the massacre of 95 people during the Naroda Gam and Naroda Patia riots that followed the Godhra train burning in February 2002. She was sentenced to 28 years in prison.
14 Dreze and Sen, An Uncertain Glory
47
(d)
Amit Shah, right hand man of Modi and Minister of State for Home Affairs, was arrested on charges of having ordered a series of encounter killings by the State Police. He is currently out on bail.15 Most recently, he was appointed by Narendra Modi to coordinate the BJPs election machine in the electorally critical state of Uttar Pradesh.16 Senior police officers Twenty two alleged terrorists were killed by the Gujarat Police in over seven encounters between 2003 and 2007. All of them were accused of conspiring to kill Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and senior VHP leaders. In the years of investigations that have followed, it has become clear that some of these were, in fact, fake encounters conducted by senior Gujarat state police and officers of the Indian Police Service (IPS). A staggering six IPS officers and 13 Gujarat state police officers are in jail. D G. Vanzara, the most senior of these police officers, resigned from the police service while in jail in September 2013 and accused Amit Shah and Narendra Modi of having given the orders to eliminate four people. In Vanzaras words (Times of India, 3 Sept. 2013): CBI had arrested me and my officers holding us responsible for carrying out alleged fake encounters. If that is true, [the CBI] have to arrest the policy formulators also, as we, being field officers, have simply implemented the conscious policy of this government. ... I am of the firm opinion that the place of this government, instead of being in Gandhinagar, should either be in Taloja Central Prison at Navi Mumbai or in Sabarmati Central Prison at Ahmedabad. Vapi in Gujarat has been designated the most polluted place in India
Gujarat has given priority to protect the environment along with development in industrial sector and has done well to protect the environment, Modi claimed while addressing a gathering in August 2013. 17 However, just three years earlier, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) had declared Gujarat the most polluted State in the country. 18The conclusion was based on the increasing levels of pollution and toxic wastes. So what is the reality of pollution in Gujarat? Has Modi managed to clean up Gujarat since 2010?
15 http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/bjp-wilts-promotes-murder-tainted-amit-shah-as-narendra-modi-flexes-muscles/1095600/ 16 http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-01-10/news/46066570_1_amit-shah-rss-lord-ram 17 India Today, August 2, 2013 http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/modi-says-gujarat-committed-to-protect-environment-alongwith-industrialdevelopment/1/297742.html 18 http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-gujarat-declared-most-polluted-state-in-the-country-1361979
48
AWAAZ NETWORK
Not if we follow CPCBs later findings. In 2012 it released its new Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index (CEPI) score which revealed that Vapi, in Southern Gujarat, was the most critically polluted place in the country, having moved up from second rank in its 2009 list.19This has necessitated a ban, by the central governments Ministry of Environment and Forests, on new projects or expansion of existing ones in Vapi imposed.20 It would appear, however, that no action has been taken by the Gujarat administration. Indeed, in the effort to be industry-friendly, issues relating to the environment are routinely neglected in the state, particularly along the 400 km industrial corridor in Gujarat between Vapi and Vatwa.21 It seems that this neglect of the environment is an integral part of the so-called Gujarat model. Considered as a whole, a more accurate assessment of Modis record as administrator would be that he has preserved Gujarats historical lead on a number of counts while failing to improve Gujarats low status in health, education and gender inequality. On other fronts too law and order and corruption-free government Modis administrative capabilities dont seem to have been transformative in any way. With respect to civil liberties, particularly those of minorities, his legacy to governance in Gujarat is extremely regressive. Stripped of public relations hyperbole, then, Modis administration has shown little by way of imaginative or innovative solutions to Gujarats real and persistent problems.
19 Critically polluted areas are those where air, water and land pollution exceed the assimilative capacity of the environment, affecting human health. http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/vapi-tops-list-critically-polluted-areass 20 http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-20/ahmedabad/42251665_1_vapi-pollution-control-board-moef 21 http://www.rainwaterharvesting.org/crisis/Industrial-pollution.htm
49
SEVEN
Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar

Prof. Chetan Bhatt, Director, Centre for the Study of Human Rights, London School of Economics
Summary
Hindutva is the term used to describe a modern, exclusionary political idea of Hindu supremacism that was directly inspired by Fascism and Nazism. It actively strives to make India a Hindu nation-state (Hindurashtra) in which all non-Hindus would be second-class citizens. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) is an organisation committed to the principles of Hindutva and dedicated to the creation of a Hindurashtra. It is exclusively male, rigidly hierarchical and cultivates militaristic practices among its members. The RSS is organised through cells (shakhas) that are aimed at recruiting young children who are instructed in RSS ideology and who subsequently move up the ranks of the organisation into positions of greater responsibility. In posing as a cultural organisation, the RSS seeks to engage people at personal and familial levels. It has a long-term perspective on achieving its stated aims. The RSS is the parent body of a wider network of organisations, called the Sangh Parivar, that take up other kinds of tasks. The RSS remains the core source of ideological guidance and personnel for all of them. The major constituents of the Sangh Parivar include the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), the Bajrang Dal and the Rashtra Sevika Samiti. BJP represents the political wing of the Sangh Parivar, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) is its religious wing and has international arms, the Bajrang Dal is a youth organisation that is often involved in extremely violent action and the Rashtra Sevika Samiti is a Hindu supremacist womens organisation.
50
AWAAZ NETWORK
What is Hindutva? Hindutva is an ideology invented by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in a pamphlet written in English and published in 1923, Hindutva who is a Hindu?1 Prior to this, Savarkar had been involved in the terrorist wing of the anti-colonial movement and imprisoned by the British. After 1937, Savarkar became president of an organization called the Hindu Mahasabha (Great Hindu Assembly) and remained a committed political opponent of Mohandas K. Gandhi. Hindu nationalists, partly inspired by the ideology of Hindutva, made six attempts on Gandhis life. Gandhis murderer Nathuram Godse was Savarkars lieutenant, and close associate. He was also a full-time worker (pracharak) for the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Savarkar himself stood trial for Gandhis murder as a co-conspirator but was acquitted. Savarkars Hindutva is based on the political view that India must be an exclusively Hindu nationstate (Hindurashtra) in which all citizens must demonstrate obedience and allegiance to Hindutva. For Savarkar, Hindutva was an identity based on race and blood (which he called the most important ingredient of Hindutva), a sanskrit-based, upper-caste idea of culture, and a sacred territory. A Hindu, according to him, was someone who shared the blood of Vedic-Aryan ancestors, embraced only sanskritik culture and who viewed India as their fatherland and holyland. Savarkar was influenced by Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy and made many statements in their support. He compared Muslims in India to Jews in Germany, supported Hitlers military invasion and occupation of Czechoslovakia and other sovereign states, and attacked Nehru for criticising Nazism and Fascism. As late as 1961, Savarkar said that India would be better off with a dictator like Hitler instead of being a democracy. What is the RSS? The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS, lit. National Volunteers Corps) was formed in 1925-1926 by Keshav Baliram Hedgewar in Nagpur, Maharashtra in Western India. Influenced by Savarkars ideas, it is an exclusively male organization devoted to the political ideology of Hindutva and represents an Indian version of fascism. Hedgewar formed RSS as an organization of young boys and men that was based on military drills, physical exercise, weapons training, propagation of the ideology of Hindutva and anti-minority hatred. Hedgewar, together with another key founder of the RSS, Balkrishna Shivram Moonje, was also influenced by Fascism and Nazism. British reports had highlighted that from 1927, B. S. Moonje, was inspired to model the RSS on Fascist and Nazi movements. In 1931, Moonje visited Fascist Italy where he met with and was extremely impressed by Mussolini.
Savarkar, V. D., Hindutva, Bombay: Veer Savarkar Prakashan, 1989.
51
Of the Fascist Balilla movement, which organized military training and fascist indoctrination of young boys, Moonje said: Mussolini saw the essential weakness of his country and conceived the idea of the Balilla organizationIndia and particularly Hindu India need some such institution for the military regeneration of the HindusOur institution, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh of Nagpur under Dr Hedgewar is of this kind, though quite independently conceived. I shall spend the rest of my life developing and extending this institution of Dr Hedgewar all throughout Maharashtra and other provinces.2 The Italy visit inspired Moonje to promote these ideas among Hindus in Maharashtra and begin to organize Hindu youth movements along the lines of this fascist model.3 In 1934, the RSSs first sarsangchalak (supreme leader), Hedgewar presided over a meeting in Nagpur aimed at propagating Mussolinis fascist thought in India. Moonje is today called Dharamveer (lit. hero in the religious struggle) by the RSS. He said that India not only needed a dictator like Hitler but that a scheme to bring such a dictator had to be urgently carried out. unless we have our own swaraj with a Hindu as a dictator like Shivaji of old or Mussolini or Hitler of present day Italy and GermanyBut this does not mean that we have to sit with folded hands until some such dictator arises in India. We should formulate a scientific scheme and carry on propaganda for it.4 RSSs second leader, Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar, also supported Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. In his key book We, or our nationhood defined, published in 1939, he was openly supportive of the anti-Semitic policies of Nazi Germany towards German-Jews and Hitlers violent invasion of other sovereign territories.5
RSS supreme leader Mohan Bhagwat at a shakha by Vishal Dutta
German race pride has now become the topic of the day. To keep up the purity of the Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by purging the country of the Semitic Races the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well-night impossible it is for Races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindusthan to learn and profit by. M.S. Golwalkar, We or Our Nationhood Defined. p. 87-88.
2 3 4 5
Moonje quoted in M. Casolari, Hindutvas foreign tie-up in the 1930s: archival evidence, Economic & Political Weekly, 22 January 2000, page 220. Casolari ibid. Moonje quoted in Casolari, ibid. Golwalkar, M.S., We, or Our Nationhood Defined, Nagpur: Bharat Publications, [1939] 1944.
52
AWAAZ NETWORK
He lauded Fascist Italy and said these were models which India could learn and profit by. German race pride has now become the topic of the day. To keep up the purity of the Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the semitic Races - the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has shown how well nigh impossible it is for Races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindusthan to learn and profit by.6 For him, in India there must exist only the Hindu nation and those who fail to abandon their racial, religious and cultural differences and fail to completely merge themselves in the National Race would only be foreigners.7 For Golwalkar, no minority was deserving of any right whatsoever or any obligations from the National race. Minorities must cultivate a positive attitude of love and devotion towards the Hindu Nation and could stay in India if they remained wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment - not even citizens rights.8 Minorities were to either give up their beliefs or live at the sweet will of the majority. These ideas continue to be core beliefs of the RSS which stated in 2002 that the safety of Muslims in India lies in the goodwill of the majority.9 Golwalkar, together with Hedgewar, is venerated by the RSS and its UK branches and his birth centenary in 2006 was celebrated lavishly by the RSS, including in the UK (see Hindutva Fascism in the UK). The RSS is not a democratic organization and is based on the idea of one Supreme Leader (sarsangchalak), obedience to the one Supreme Leader (ek chalak anuvartitva) and of the Supreme
6 7 8 9 Madhav Golwalkar, We, or our nationhood defined, Bharat Publications, Nagpur, [1939] 1944, page 37. Golwalkar, ibid, pages 45-6. Golwalkar, ibid, pages 48-9. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2002-03-28/news/27352782_1_bangaloreresolution-rss-leader-mr-vaidya
So long as the Christians here indulge in such [proselytizing] activities and consider themselves as agents of the international movement for the spread of Christianity, and refuse to offer their first loyalty to the land of their birth and behave as true children of the heritage and culture of their ancestors, they will remain here as hostiles and will have to be treated as such. M.S. Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Part 2, Ch. 16
53
Leader as the principle one who is to be venerated (parampoojaniya). RSS members are called swayamsevaks (lit. volunteers) working in the service of the Hindu Nation. The Indian RSS claims not to keep membership records but it has an estimated 2.5 4 million members and 40,000 regular cells (shakhas). It claims not to keep any bank accounts and it does not have to pay income tax. It is notified under Indian law as an organization of a political nature and so cannot legally receive foreign funds in its own name. The RSSs primary goal is to hierarchically organize and strengthen Hindus and create an entirely new society based on its ideology of militarism, masculinity and hatred of others. Taking forward Savarkars ideas, this new society is imagined as a powerful and exclusive Hindurashtra (Hindu nationstate). The shakha is the basic unit of organisation. Here members undertake physical exercise and military drills, ideological discussions and a range of rituals, of which the most important are devotion to its saffron flag and its first two sarsangchalaks, Hedgewar and Golwalkar. Shakhas are organized by age groups: from very young children to youths, adults, and the elderly. Among the crucial aims of the shakha (whether run by the RSS in India or HSS in UK) is to recruit children at a very young age, inculcate RSS ideology in them, bring them closer to the RSS and its organizations and eventually lead them to more activist and senior positions. In the UK, shakhas are often presented to parents, teachers and others as simply educational activities for young children, including classes on Hinduism and Gujarati language. Understanding How the RSS Works The Indian RSS is an extremely tightly-structured and secretive organization with a very strong hierarchy, rigid rules for its members and officers, its own decision-making bodies and structures, its own festivals, hymns, songs, rituals, uniform and daily activities in shakhas. has always had the overriding goal of a totally organized, ordered and muscular Hindu society that would turn India into a Hindu nation-state (Hindurashtra). RSS statements about pseudosecularism, minority appeasement and Hindu rights are secondary to this principal aim: to create a Hindurashtra. uses methods for organizing, strengthening and consolidating Hindus called sangathan. This is also central to how RSS organizations outside India carry out their work. The aim of sangathan is to bring other Hindus closer to the RSS ideal of Hindurashtra. uses a very carefully created language that substitutes its narrow ideology for Hinduism, Indian nationalism, patriotism, social service, welfare, charity and religion. This includes the deception that the RSS is a cultural and not a political organization. works strategically and patiently, on a long-term basis and at very deep, personal, individual and familial levels.
54
AWAAZ NETWORK
is both an independent entity and works through affiliated fronts. These fronts usually have a more specific scope of activity, or are addressed to particular groups: political, religious, cultural, welfare, educational, women, students, labour, tribal, peasants and youth. These often have different national, regional and local names and help establish RSS presence across a range of fields in Indian civil and political society. Often, the RSS connection is not immediately visible, but all of them are started, coordinated or run by RSS full-time propagators or volunteers (pracharaks), usually deputised by the RSS for such work. is the base or foundational organization for the whole Sangh Parivar. The key to understanding the activities of Sangh Parivar organizations, whether in India or elsewhere, is the aims, goals and ideology of the RSS. The Sangh Parivar The RSS has created a range of affiliated organizations in India called the Sangh Parivar or the RSS family. The most important of these organizations are: Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP World Hindu Council), The VHP was formed in 1964 by RSS activists and Golwalkar. The VHP has grown tremendously since the 1980s and has both a national (Indian) and an international structure. It also has a youth wing, the extremely violent Bajrang Dal, a womens wing (the Durga Vahini), associated organizations such as the Hindu Jagran Manch (Forum for Hindu Awakening), and a variety of other service, religious and social sections. The RSS sarsangchalak is also a member of the VHPs Council of the Learned and its executive body. The VHP has been at the absolute forefront of mass violent Hindutva movements, such as the Ramjanmabhoomi (the supposed birthplace of Ram) movement to destroy the sixteenth-century Babri mosque at Ayodhya and build a Ram temple in its place; the campaign for the liberation of Krishnajanmasthan (the alleged birth place of Krishna) at Mathura, in which the VHP wishes to destroy mosques near a Krishna temple; the Kashi Vishwanath campaign, Varanasi, in which the VHP wants mosque buildings near a Shiva shrine to be removed; and the Saraswati Bhojshala campaign, Dhar, in which the VHP wants shrines and mosques used for a joint Hindu-Muslim tradition of worship at a Saraswati temple to be destroyed. Of the Gujarat carnage, the VHP said that it was a successful experiment which will be repeated all over the country.10 The VHP and its associated organization the Hindu Jagran Manch, and the extremely violent VHP youth wing, the Bajrang Dal took the lead in the systematic attack on Christian communities in Gujarat from 1997, which reached a peak of brutality in 1998-1999.
10 http://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/india-hate-speeches-violence-gujarat-must-be-stopped
55
Bajrang Dal (Hanumans Army) Bajrang Dal is the extremely violent and fanatical youth wing of the VHP. It works through terror and intimidation of minorities and secular opponents. It has been consistently involved and implicated in acts of violence, terror and murder, including many of the killings during the Gujarat violence in 2002. Bharatiya Janata Party The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is a Hindu nationalist political party which is currently the main opposition party and heads the National Democratic Alliance coalition. Shortly after coming to power in 1998, the NDA government detonated nuclear devices in the Pokharan desert close to the Pakistani border, resulting in a similar response from Pakistan. The BJP is committed to the ideology of Hindutva, cultural nationalism (sanskritik rashtriyavad) and Integral Humanism (a form of Hindutva developed by an RSS full-time organizer called Deendayal Upadhyaya in the mid-1960s). Its slogan is One Nation, One People, One Culture in which all citizens must consider the Hindu nation sacred. Rashtra Sevika Samiti Rashtra Sevika Samiti is a womens organization created in 1936 as the first RSS affiliate. It is committed to the same Hindutva ideology as the RSS, and strongly opposes feminism and secular projects for womens emancipation. It adopts the patriarchal RSS ideology of matruvat paradareshu, which essentially means that women have two roles as mother or wife. The Hindutva womens movement has also been violent and encouraged violence against minority communities, especially through the hate speech of Sadhvi Rithambara (VHP) and Uma Bharati (BJP, VHP). The Sevikas also have a shakha structure, organizational hierarchy, songs, festivals and uniforms, paralleling those of the RSS. Other major organizations affiliated to the RSS include: Sewa Bharati the RSS service affiliate formed in 1989. Sewa International the international fundraising wing for RSS service projects. Bharatiya Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram (VKA) the RSS affiliate working among adivasi (tribal) populations. Vidya Bharati Akhil Bharatiya Shiksha Sansthan the RSS educational affiliate formed in 1976. Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) the RSS student affiliate formed in 1948 to combat leftwing influences among students and academics in the university and college sector. Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh the RSS labour affiliate formed in 1955 to defeat communist influences in industry.
56
AWAAZ NETWORK
The RSS, then, presides over a formidably diverse set of affiliates. These have a variety of arenas of intervention from the cultural and religious to the overtly political and a range of modes of activity from the legal-electoral to the violent. All, however, are unified by the long-term vision of the RSS: to redefine belonging and nationality in India in terms of the Hindu-supremacist ideology of Hindutva. SOURCES Andersen W. K. and Damle S., The Brotherhood in Saffron: the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and Hindu revivalism, Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1987. Bhatt, C., Hindu nationalism: origins, ideologies and modern myths, Oxford: Berg, 2001. Golwalkar, M. S., Bunch of Thoughts, Jagrana Prakashana, Bangalore, 1966. Jaffrelot, C., The Hindu nationalist movement and Indian politics, London: Hurst, 1996. Kanungo, P., RSSs Tryst With Politics: From Hedgewar to Sudarshan, Delhi: Manohar, 2002. Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, RSS: Spearheading National Renaissance, Karnataka: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, 1980. Sarkar, S., The Fascism of the Sangh Parivar, Economic and Political Weekly, 28 (5), January 30, 1993, 163-167. Seshadri, H. V. ed., RSS: A Vision in Action, Bangalore: Jagarana Prokashana, 1988.
57
EIgHt
Hindutva Fascism in the UK

Prof. Chetan Bhatt, Director, Centre for the Study of Human Rights Summary
The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has been established and active in the UK since 1966 under the name Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh (HSS). The HSS shares the same ideology as the RSS in India, and models its organisational structure and family of affiliated organisations in the UK on the Indian parent organisation.
The primary aim of HSS UK activities is to create physical and ideological training cells (shakhas) and to organize and strengthen Hindus (sangathan) under RSS ideology.
HSS UK shakhas are run in almost exactly the same way as RSS shakhas. They include prayers, hymns and slogans, devotion to the RSS saffron flag, adulation of K. B. Hedgewar and M. S. Golwalkar (the first two RSS supreme leaders), physical exercises, sports, martial arts, and ideological indoctrination sessions
Direct links between the HSS and RSS are also well attested. Since the mid-1990s, heads of the RSS in India have come to UK regularly to provide guidance and motivation to the HSS.
Like the RSS, HSS too presides over a family of organisations that includes the National Hindu Students Forum, Vishwa Hindu Parishad International, Sewa International, Hindu Sevika Samiti and Overseas Friends of the BJP.
Raising funds for the activities of the RSS in India is a crucial part of the activities of the HSS and its affiliates. Often these fundraising drives are carried out in the wake of natural disasters in India. The majority of the funds are, however, inevitably used to further the ideas and goals of the RSS, in particular the establishment of RSS-organised schools and religious institutions.
Firms like Saffron Chase, formed by HSS activists, have actively worked to improve Narendra Modis image in UK. They have tried to shift attention away from his role in the riots in 2002 and to present him as simply a business-friendly administrator concerned with development.
Labour Friends of India in general and Barry Gardiner M.P. in particular have been advocating the cause of the BJP in India. In part, this has been a result of the work of HSS and the rest of its affiliates. Gardiner has had close and long-term ties with the HSS and its family.
58
AWAAZ NETWORK
The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has been established and active in the UK since 1966 under the name of Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh (HSS). HSS shares the same ideology as the RSS in India, and models its organisational structure and family of UK affiliated organisations on the Indian parent organisation1. Together with the Vishwa Hindu Parishad UK (a branch of the violent, Hindu supremacist VHP in India), HSS UK maintains very close and extensive links with the Indian RSS and works under the latters direct guidance2. Just like the Indian RSS, HSS UK targets young Hindu boys and girls, incorporating them into cells called shakhas (lit. branches). Youngsters are taught to revere the RSSs two Supreme Leaders both of whom were admirers and conscious emulators of Nazism and Fascism and the RSSs saffron flag (see Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar). To this very day, the HSS glorifies and celebrates the personality and work of the RSSs second leader, Madhav Golwalkar, a strong advocate of Nazi-like ideas for India. The fundraising arms of the HSS, Sewa International (aka Sewa UK) and other sewa activities of the National Hindu Students Forum (NHSF) are geared to raising funds from the British public and British students for RSS projects and aims in India. As is outlined below, the HSS, its activists and its affiliates in the UK, including the NHSF, have lobbied and advocated strongly for Narendra Modi at a number of political levels. HSS members and associates have been a dominant influence on the Labour Friends of India and are key supporters of the newly-formed All Party Parliamentary Group for British Hindus. Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh, UK The Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh UK (HSS UK) was initiated in 1966 and became a charitable trust from 1974 (charity registration number 267309). Its headquarters in Leicester was called Keshav Pratishthan (institute), Keshav being the first name of the founder of the Indian RSS. The inauguration of the new offices in April 1995 was presided over by the then sarsangchalak (supreme leader) of the RSS, Rajendra Singh. The primary aim of HSS UK activities is to create physical and ideological training cells (shakhas) and to organize and strengthen Hindus (sangathan) under RSS ideology. HSS ideology is disseminated in its shakhas for very young children (balagokulam), teenagers and adults. In 2002, HSS reported 72 weekly shakhas in 38 UK cities which were attended by about 1500 individuals. HSS UK shakhas are run in almost exactly the same way as those of the RSS. This includes the prayers, hymns and slogans, devotion to the RSS saffron flag, adulation of K. B. Hedgewar and M. S. Golwalkar (the first two RSS sarsangchalaks), physical exercises, sports, martial arts, and ideological inculcation sessions. HSS UK and its affiliates celebrate the same six festivals (utsavs) as the Indian RSS. HSS UK also organizes annual intensive training camps for nominated members who are moving up the HSS hierarchy, national activist camps, as well as other related activities in Europe and India.
1 2
Awaaz South Asia Watch, In bad faith? British charity and Hindu extremism, London: Awaaz South Asia Watch, 2004: 43 Awaaz South Asia Watch, In bad faith?, pp. 46-49
59
HSS ideology is made explicit in its publications, in the material used in its shakhas and in the publications sold by the Hindu Sahitya Kendra (Hindu Literature Centre). These include writings by and about Golwalkar, Hedgewar, Savarkar, the RSS and writings on Aryanism and Hindutva.
The persons assembling there [in the shakha] learn to obey a single command. Discipline enters their blood. More important than discipline of the body is the discipline of the mind. They learn to direct their individual emotions and impulses towards the great national cause. M.S. Golwalkar, Bunch of Thoughts, Part 4, Ch. 33
The Indian RSS is quite open about its links with HSS and VHP UK. The Indian RSS explicitly considers the work of the HSS UK, the Hindu Sevika Samiti UK, the VHP UK, the NHSF, the Overseas Friends of the BJP, the Kalyan Ashram Trust, Sewa International and Hindu Sahitya Kendra, among others, as part of the RSSs Hindutva mission in the UK.These are not paper links but deep connections that work in both directions.The previous sarsangchalaks of the RSS, Rajendra Singh, K.S. Sudarshan and the current RSS leader Mohan Bhagwat, have been on tours to the UK at which they have addressed HSS UK members and given guidelines for HSS work in the UK.3 The visit by Rajendra Singh to Europe from 13 25 April 1995 was the first ever visit abroad by an RSS supreme leader. During this tour he spoke at meetings of the HSS and Sewa International, the NHSF, the VHP and the Hindu Sevika Samiti, among other Hindutva groups. This pattern of association between the HSS and its family here on the one hand and the RSS and its family in India on the other has continued and expanded greatly. RSS Supreme Leader Mohan Bhagwat visiting UK in September 2008 to launch a book celebrating the ideology of M.S. Golwalkar, the second RSS leader who espoused strongly Fascist and Nazi-like ideas. Sangh Sandesh Oct Dec 2008, p. 4 UK SANGH PARIVAR The HSS UK family (Sangh Parivar) makes up a closely-related set of Hindutva organizations operating in the UK. Their aims and ideology are also based on that of the RSS. National Hindu Students Forum While most Hindu students would not be aware of its RSS links, which are often kept well-hidden, the National Hindu Students Forum is an HSS affiliate operating amongst university students and modelled on the RSSs Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad. NHSF has chapters in about
3 Awaaz South Asia Watch 2004: 46; Sangh Sandesh Oct-Dec 2008: 4
AWAAZ NETWORK
60
30 UK universities. Of late, NHSF has claimed to have no link to HSS UK. For example, in August 2003 its Vice President said, We have no direct link with them [HSS UK]. There is no religious or political affiliation; we are not funded or bonded to them, but there is a moral affiliation as with every other Hindu organization.4 Similarly, in 2004, the NHSF General Secretary Shrien Dewani (currently facing charges in South African courts related to the brutal murder of his wife Anni Hindocha) also vociferously denied the HSS links, while in the same statement confirming that NHSF does raise funds for the HSS.5 In fact, NHSF was formed by the HSS and considered essential to spread RSS ideology among the next generation of UK Hindus. In its initial years NHSF shared the same address as the HSS UK, but changed its address following exposure of its RSS links in the early 2000s. Prior to this, their website stated that NHSF enjoys a close working relationship with HSS UK and benefits from the active involvement of the karyakartas (volunteers) within HSS. The spread of HSS throughout towns and cities in the United Kingdom means that the former is an integral part of the support network for NHSF.6 NHSF maintains strong links with RSS/HSS organisations in a number of ways: By fundraising for Sewa International (Sewa UK), Sewa Day and other HSS-organised projects. (See below for Sewa Internationals role as fundraising arm of RSS/HSS).
Through promoting Narendra Modi and working to support him Through individual links between HSS members and the NHSF By promoting Hindutva ideology in its activities and publications Sewa International The primary purpose of Sewa International (aka Sewa UK) is to raise funds for RSS projects in India mainly for organisations like Sewa Bharati, Vidya Bharati and the network of RSS-associated one-teacher schools that go by several names and charitable fronts in the UK and US, including Ekal Vidyalaya and Saraswati Vidyalaya. Several other projects are associated with Sewa International, including Charity Through Adventure and Sewa Day, itself a charity in the UK established by HSS figures. The RSS in India is particularly active during humanitarian disasters and these are often seen as opportunities to expand the Sangh Parivar network within the affected areas, build RSS schools, generate one-teacher schools (especially among adivasi so-called tribal groups), build religious institutions modelled on RSS ideology, focus on projects in adivasi communities to initiate them into Hindutva ideology. This RSS strategy in India is directly supported through fundraising by HSS-linked groups in the UK, Europe and North America.
4 5 6 Aiden Jones, Society fundamentalist links, Warwick Boar, Summer, 2003, vol. 25, issue 21. http://www.nhsf.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=37:29-february-2004-awaaz-spread-lies&catid=241:national&Item id=219 http://www.nhsf.org.uk/aboutus.htm (now removed but accessed and archived in 2004 and available),
61
After extreme public concern in UK in the early 2000s about the fundraising by Sewa International/HSS UK for RSS projects in India, including for groups engaged in systematic violence and hatred against minorities in India, UK Hindutva groups have created front organisations that attempt to disguise RSS links. Similarly, groups like NHSF have changed their address and it is no longer the same as that of the HSS. However, NHSF, Sewa UK and other associated groups continue to be driven by a commitment to further RSS ideology and aims in their activities. The fundraising nexus between the HSS, Sewa UK, NHSF and the RSS in India is well illustrated by the Uttarakhand floods appeal in 2013. This humanitarian disaster became the basis of an appeal by Sewa International/Sewa UK. Fundraising was undertaken by NHSF and other Hindutva outfits ostensibly for neutral disaster relief and rehabilitation. However, what was not made clear in the UK is that the funds were intended for the Uttaranchal Daivi Aapda Peedit Sahayata Samiti, an organisation established directly by the RSS and which was raising funds for, among other things, a range of RSS educational projects aimed at furthering Hindutva ideology among school children.7
Hindu Sevika Samiti The Hindu Sevika Samiti is the HSS womens affiliate formed in 1975. It is modelled on the RSS womens affiliate (Rashtra Sevika Samiti) and has about thirty shakhas in the UK, attended weekly by around 500 women and girls.
Overseas Friends of the BJP OFBJP was formed in 1991 to provide support for the Indian BJP and BJP politicians. OFBJP and other organisations set up by HSS figures organized the visit of Narendra Modi to Britain in 2003 and are actively working to promote him in the build up to the Indian General Election in May 2014.
The Vishwa Hindu Parishad UK VHP UK was formed in 1971 and acquired charitable status in 1972. VHP UK has about a dozen branches including in London, Bolton, Bradford, Leicester, Manchester, Birmingham, Northampton and Nottingham. The first VHP temple was established in Bolton in the mid-1970s, followed by two other temples, including the VHP Ilford Hindu Centre in north-east London. VHP UK is involved in the Interfaith Network (UK), various Standing Advisory Councils on Religious Education (SACREs), and other local Hindu Councils. It has also been involved in several campaigns against what it believes to be insulting representations of Hindu deities.
http://www.rss.org/Encyc/2013/6/19/Uttarakhand-Calamity--RSS,-VHP-active-in-rescue-operations.aspx
AWAAZ NETWORK
62
Hindu Sahitya Kendra A bookshop disseminating Hindutva literature in the UK and based at the HSS UK headquarters in Leicester. HINDUTVA SUPPORTING OUTFITS AND INDIVIDUALS Saffron Chase Saffron Chase is a public relations company established by activists Vikas Pota and Manoj Ladwa, both longterm associates of HSS, NHSF, Sewa International and other Hindutva projects in the UK. Saffron Chase is a very small company that appears to be largely inactive now. Its company motto is Managing Perceptions and it has been credited with working to rehabilitate Narendra Modi the butcher of Gujarat in the UK. Its literature sought to present him as an efficient international statesman committed to business and development. It has been claimed that Saffron Chase was instrumental in changing the current coalition governments orientation towards Narendra Modi.8
Labour Friends of India LFI has, for a large part of its existence, been more aptly called Labour Friends of the RSS. This has been the case particularly under the former chairpersonship of Barry Gardiner MP, a long-term supporter of Hindutva organisations in the UK. Key figures in the office of LFI have been committed HSS ideologues and BJP supporters, and the agenda of LFI has been driven, to a great extent, by the activities of HSS-associated figures. This work is supplemented by other work in the Labour Party and in parliament by long-term associates of the HSS such as Vikas Pota, Sanjay Jagatia, Manoj Ladwa, Nilesh Solanki, Jayesh Jotangia among others. A new parliamentary forum, the All Party Parliamentary Group for British Hindus, arose from this impulse and has significant practical support from UK Hindutva associates.9
Barry Gardiner MP Barry Gardiner has been the most important political figure in the endeavour to rehabilitate and normalise extreme right-wing Hindutva fascism in Britain. It is ironic that a figure identified with the labour movement colludes with the most extremist of right-wing ideologies, one that was inspired by Fascism and National Socialism and led to the murder of Gandhi. Gardiner has had a very long association with the RSSs family of organisations in the UK, including HSS, VHP UK, OFBJP and Sewa International among others, energetically supporting the events and activities of UK Hindutva organisations. He has defended VHP and RSS positions in Parliament and worked tirelessly to promote Narendra Modi in the UK.
8 9
Sinha, P. UK Based Hindutva Lobbyists Manoj Ladwa and Vikas Pota Driving Force Behind Modis UK Invitation, 25 August 2013, http://www.truthofgujarat.com/uk-based-hindutva-lobbyists-manoj-ladwa-vikas-pota-driving-force-behind-modis-uk-invitation/ http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmallparty/register/hindus.htm; http://www.cityhindusnetwork.org.uk/appg/
63
SOURCES Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Spearheading National Renaissance, Prakashan Vibhag, Bangalore, 1985. Sanghshakti Vijetreeyam, Antar Rashtriya Sahyog Pratishthan, Ahmedabad, 12 December 1995. Tattwawadi, S. Sarsanghchalak goes abroad: a collection of lectures delivered by Prof. Rajendra Singh on foreign land, Suruchi Prakashan, New Delhi, 1995.
64
AWAAZ NETWORK
65
! !
! ! ! !
Published by Awaaz Network ! & The Monitoring Group! editor@awaaz-uk.org! www.awaaz-uk.org!

Modi Exposed 2014 Report Awaaz

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Modi Exposed 2014 Report Awaaz

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Narendra Modi Exposed

CHALLENGING THE MYTHS SURROUNDING THE BJPS PRImE MINISTERIAL CANDIDATE

GAUTAm AppA AND ANISH VANAIK Published by Awaaz Network 2014

PUbLISHED bY Awaaz Network and The Monitoring Group

First Edition ISBN 978-0-9576974-2-3

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

Glossary of terms and abbreviations

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

ONE Narendra Modi: The Making of a Hindutva Leader

Modi at a political rally, September 2013 by NarendraModiofficial

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

TWo NARENDRA MoDIS CULPABILItY IN tHE GUJARAt GENoCIDE: A FACtSHEEt

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

The Murder of British Citizens in a Genocide Forgotten

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

See more at: http://www.hardnewsmedia.com/2012/02/4566#sthash.gXypOxc0.dpuf

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

Violence and Control: Modi, Hindutva and Women

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

Dont Believe the Hype: Modis Model of Governance

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

Modi with business tycoon, Mukesh Ambani by NarendraModiofficial

The details of this deal were leaked in 2008. http://ibnlive.in.com/news/modis-offer-for-nano-rs9570-cr-soft-loan/77974-7.html http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-cbi-probe-sought-in-rs400-crore-fisheries-scam-ingujarat-1786107

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

14 Dreze and Sen, An Uncertain Glory

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

Hindutva, RSS and the Sangh Parivar

Savarkar, V. D., Hindutva, Bombay: Veer Savarkar Prakashan, 1989.

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

RSS supreme leader Mohan Bhagwat at a shakha by Vishal Dutta

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

Hindutva Fascism in the UK

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

NAREnDA MODI EXPOSED

You might also like